Read Negative User Reviews for Ghostbusters (2016)

1

moviefanicAug 24, 2023

the only thing that needs to be gotten rid of is the worst reboot of all time, 2016 version of ghostbusters, which is a movie that shoves a middle finger to people who loved the first 2 ghostbuster movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

alerikandersonMay 11, 2023

The first Ghostbusters is one of my favorite movies of all time, this ruined it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

daniel_Apr 7, 2023

I don´t really know why Bill Murray, Dan Akroyd and the others appeared in that horrible boring unfunny movie. The only good thing about that movie: it reminds you of how good the original Ghostbusters movie was.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

LegoLover58Feb 3, 2023

It's like the original Ghostbusters movie, if the original Ghostbusters movie rehashed the plot of the original, and replaced the witty humor with forced jokes and an obscene amount of product placement.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

1

Mack9393Dec 9, 2022

I can’t believe Dan Aykroyd produced this. Bad writing, worse acting despite endless cameos, and just cheap “comedy.” Stop ruining great franchises!

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

2

AshenWonOct 18, 2022

A shallow, yet predictable ‘modern twist’ that adds nothing to the Ghostbusters legacy, other than smearing the name and leaving a sour taste in the mouth. Poor humour, a far-cry from the cherished energy and vibe of the originals/animatedA shallow, yet predictable ‘modern twist’ that adds nothing to the Ghostbusters legacy, other than smearing the name and leaving a sour taste in the mouth. Poor humour, a far-cry from the cherished energy and vibe of the originals/animated series and quite frankly a display of D-Grade ideas with a budget more than it can chew.

The epitome of a terrible, very obvious elephant in the room, 21st century rebrand attempt.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

acidbunnyOct 8, 2022

Movie summary:
Twitter: What!? The first movie doesn't have women as main characters!?
Columbia Pictures: Take this reboot with female main characters extremely forced.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

1

FionanMurphyAug 14, 2022

A god awful movie that shouldve been given to an ACTUAL comedian to write the script

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

TrtmfmJun 15, 2022

My rating has nothing to do with the cast being all female, it's just a terrible movie with terrible acting.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

Por64Mar 21, 2022

There's only one good thing about this movie and that's the the war is over if you want to sign in the movie and that's it. Cuz the movie insults your intelligence and put the fans of the good movies on the offensive instead of like admittingThere's only one good thing about this movie and that's the the war is over if you want to sign in the movie and that's it. Cuz the movie insults your intelligence and put the fans of the good movies on the offensive instead of like admitting they're making a bad movie and they force the cast members to attack fans as well it's by far the worst movie ever made in the 21st century it makes you wonder how terrible products get greenlet at all I rather or only watch Batman and Robin or any other terrible movie over this garbage of the film I'm all for equality and I remember all four a movie where you get a female or a or someone who's not a guy as the lead but you can't just let that be the only thing about the movie as you're marking point cuz most rational human beings don't care if it's the old lady reboot I mean I just don't care for garbage movies that insults and attacks fans for no reason it's still insulting that they still make like a or even sell these multi movie packs that carries this abomination with of the two good movies and watch now they're going to try to shoe horn that in that to the recent Ghostbusters afterlife I mean watch Ghostbusters afterlife it's more respectful for everyone then Ghostbusters 2016 this is one of the few movies I'd rather watch myself drown then to ever watch again… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

Lucius_13Jan 20, 2017

this movie was a disgrace to Ghostbusters from all the annoying Queef jokes to the even more annoying wonton jokes and constant man shaming definitely avoid this one, the older Ghostbusters movies had jokes in them yes but they were morethis movie was a disgrace to Ghostbusters from all the annoying Queef jokes to the even more annoying wonton jokes and constant man shaming definitely avoid this one, the older Ghostbusters movies had jokes in them yes but they were more serious and the jokes were actually funny and not done at the expense of an entire gender I can't wait for the real Ghostbusters 3 next year its gonna kick this movies ass!… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

1

ReapingSoulsFeb 8, 2022

Bland and failed PR stunt. Poorly scripted, not funny and the acting doesn't suit the characters. For all the hype this film was given, it truly face planted and everybody who came for the experience saw it that way. It's a pity thatBland and failed PR stunt. Poorly scripted, not funny and the acting doesn't suit the characters. For all the hype this film was given, it truly face planted and everybody who came for the experience saw it that way. It's a pity that professional reviewers cast their opinions through a certain optic in today's world. Compare for example the guardians review of this movie vs. Ghostbusters Afterlife.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

LoneWolfNYCJan 27, 2022

I tried, i swear i really tried. This "movie" is a shame for the cinema industry, a shame for women, a shame for men, a shame for this franchise, a shame for the city of New York, a shame for humor, and a shame for all existing form ofI tried, i swear i really tried. This "movie" is a shame for the cinema industry, a shame for women, a shame for men, a shame for this franchise, a shame for the city of New York, a shame for humor, and a shame for all existing form of intelligence on earth.

It's a kind of analogy of Idiocracy. Take two very good movies of the 80's which are smart, fun and classy and look at what it became few decades later. A totaly dumb and stupid spectacle with terrible jokes and farts.

I facepalmed myself a dozen of times during this "thing". Pathetic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Pedda11Jan 6, 2022

Improvisation can work in movies, the first Ironman was largely improvised and it's great, this movie is not.
If this movie had a real script written by someone with, well talent an all female Ghostbusters movie could have worked.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

BigCrompyJan 1, 2022

Marginally worse, if that’s possible, than the all-male re-boot of Steel Magnolias (Jack Black, Danny Trejo, Pee-Wee Herman, Rob Reiner, Simon Callow) which must logically be just around the corner.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

CapnCrunch17Dec 12, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a terrible movie, where do I begin. First off nobody asked for a reboot, we simply wanted to continue the story from GB2 or the video game (depending on what is considered cannon).
I'm sure the girls are funny, but they felt bland and boring, except for the chick who played Holzman. She made this movie somewhat watchable.
The comedy is forced and not funny, the ghosts look like ghosts from Scooby doo 2. The "epic" battle at the end is with the logo ghost.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

SynthwaveRiderNov 27, 2021

This movie was hot garbage. Never watch this. Such a disgrace to the original, it was making fun of it

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

fruitylittlenutNov 1, 2021

after this movie i simply wished to no longer exist, i had heatstroke once? this movie was worse. i want my eyeballs simply gone. goodnight.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

1

jinchlovechildNov 1, 2021

This movie destroyed my mental state and intestines simultaneously. I watched it with friends luckily, as if i had watched it alone i might have gone off the deep end. To watch this movie is to experience personal and global crisis. IThis movie destroyed my mental state and intestines simultaneously. I watched it with friends luckily, as if i had watched it alone i might have gone off the deep end. To watch this movie is to experience personal and global crisis. I wouldn't even put this movie on if i happened to be in the vicinity of Hopper from A Bug's Life because him knowing that i consciously chose to watch it would send me into the deepest pits of shameful hell. While i was watching this my poor dog entered my room and consequently vomited on my carpet. Shame on you. I have spew on my carpet. I don't have any paper towels how am i going to deal with this. God damn. I give it a one because it's redeeming feature was Sigourney Weaver.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

0

grinchisdaddyNov 1, 2021

I would rather experience my cells die for an hour and fifty-six minutes than rewatch this travesty. I am lucky I had friends with me to watch this, for I may have simply ended it all had I not. I can only describe this movie as if Bad HabitsI would rather experience my cells die for an hour and fifty-six minutes than rewatch this travesty. I am lucky I had friends with me to watch this, for I may have simply ended it all had I not. I can only describe this movie as if Bad Habits by Ed Sheeran and The Scooby Doo Animated Movie were digested and defecated by a naked mole rat. A solid 0.1/100, the only redeeming factor is that it ended.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

2

FilipeNetoOct 23, 2021

Released almost twenty years late, this is the third film in the "Ghostbusters" franchise. In fact, I only understood the reason for the delay after some reading: a contract specified that a new film would be released if the director and theReleased almost twenty years late, this is the third film in the "Ghostbusters" franchise. In fact, I only understood the reason for the delay after some reading: a contract specified that a new film would be released if the director and the four original protagonists agreed, and that agreement has never been possible until now. On the one hand, I'm glad that this has been surpassed, but on the other hand I confess that I expected something more: this film is good, it entertains and is a visual spectacle, but it has many flaws. For me, the most outrageous is to ignore original films. That is, I would have preferred to see a sequel which continues the story and takes into account the years that have passed, than a pure and simple "reboot" that ignores everything before.

The script begins with the meeting of two old friends, both scientists, who in the past were fascinated by the world of the supernatural. One of them remains connected to this and is head of a university research office, but the other wants to forget about it, and be regarded as a serious academic in the scientific world. However, the way they quickly bridge their differences and re-match efforts is far-fetched, and the film's continuation will not improve that: we have forced, unbelievable, illogical ideas and situations, ill-conceived characters, a constant and irritating obsession with gender issues and political correctness, which keep the quality of the plot below what we can demand. Because of this, and other issues that I will address, I am forced to rate director Paul Feig's performance as an amateur. He seems to have simply let things go by themselves, intervening as little as possible and demanding only the basics of everything and everyone.

The cast has several strong names, starting with the quartet formed by Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones. I really can't say something bad about their work. I think they did the best they could with the material they received, even though the dialogue is fake, the jokes are silly, and the characters are as dense as a cardboard. Jones is the better to handle it, in contrast to a sleepy McCarthy and an exaggerated, histrionic McKinnon. Contrary to what some might have thought, I don't believe the fact that they are women (in the previous films, the Ghostbusters were men) is a special bonus. For me, it's irrelevant, as I care more about character design and the good work of the actors than about gender issues, which only serve to polarize and use cinema for political purposes, taking the focus away from art and of quality entertainment. Instead of using cinema to make politics, empowering women and feminizing men, films should seek to improve their stories, give credibility and depth to the characters, bet on quality. Otherwise, the feeling that pervades is that cinema seeks to do a work of expiation or penance. Maybe that's why I hated Chris Hemsworth: in addition to failing to be a good villain, he's amorphous for most of the movie and has the intelligence of a canary. Neil Casey doesn't even deserve to be mentioned: his work is forgettable. I liked the cameo of the original protagonists, but I regret they couldn't revive the original characters as well. It would have been something more honorable and meritorious.

Technically, the film bets everything on visual effects and an ambitious, expensive, flashy and full of color CGI. This is something really impressive, and on the big screen it has a remarkable impact, but ultimately it gets tedious, excessive and turns the movie into a kind of expensive and noisy video game, an excuse for tons of expensive effects. The film misses the action scenes, which are absorbed by the effects and lack impact. The cinematography is good and impressive, but the editing was poorly done, and I think the cuts were excessive or badly placed. The soundtrack tries to honor the original by updating it, but it ended up making one of the most interesting theme songs in the cinema of the Nineties dull and monotonous.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

LancedSoulSep 22, 2021

Who are ya gonna call? Someone else and at least Harold Ramis didn't live to see this garbage ****

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

HarryDangerAug 16, 2021

Interesting to see how critics review the movie. It shows me who is actually reviewing the movie objectively and who is blinded by a social agenda. The movie is just not good at all. It's terrible.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

anfeherle89Jul 30, 2021

bad, bad, bad everything in this movie is bad!!!, don't look it, is better watch growing up the grass and more funny

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

DrD00mJul 17, 2021

Cash grab which wants to take advantage of old-school Ghostbusters fans. Unfortunately they don't stop there. In addition, you'll get brainwashed with feminism ideology. I don't mind a woman cast but when they try to shove it down my throatCash grab which wants to take advantage of old-school Ghostbusters fans. Unfortunately they don't stop there. In addition, you'll get brainwashed with feminism ideology. I don't mind a woman cast but when they try to shove it down my throat this blatantly it doesn't work for me. Sorry. Don't watch!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

SombreJun 4, 2021

Well. I saw the movie (So i'm not someone who critic a movie than i didn't watch, like the writters & producer accuse people). It’s bad written. It’s just a vessel, an excuse, to make men look like crap & stupid. To make women look likeWell. I saw the movie (So i'm not someone who critic a movie than i didn't watch, like the writters & producer accuse people). It’s bad written. It’s just a vessel, an excuse, to make men look like crap & stupid. To make women look like awesome even if their acting is bad. Only Kate McKinnon play nice in this movie but it’s not enough to save the movie sadly. Even the “evil” guy is bad written. The "background" characters act like vegetables, they are just here to answer to the main characters, they have no mind of their own. And the story is pretty bad. They can say what they want about people making critic without seeing the movie, the fact is if you watch it, it’s even worse. The movie could have been better without all those feminist crap. Making a “normal” movie in hollywood seem difficult in modern times.
I really regret all those insane sexist message. I'm watching movie to relax not to see hollywood pepper me with politics fights.

When i see the choose they made to make this movie, i'm not surprise to see than the movie failed. They deserve what they get. They were lazy and decide freely to bring feminist into a movie. They decide to release a poor movie. That's totally their fault.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

GrendizerMay 2, 2021

Bad script, bad jokes, no substance, very superficial, try hard, no guts, no glory.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

wa3zgtMar 15, 2021

I have read comments about the alleged misogyny based dislikes of the new 2016 Ghostbusters movie reboot…
I can assure you that i am NOT against a re-boot, or a woman lead Ghostbusters team, but i AM against spending time, effort, money andI have read comments about the alleged misogyny based dislikes of the new 2016 Ghostbusters movie reboot…
I can assure you that i am NOT against a re-boot, or a woman lead Ghostbusters team, but i AM against spending time, effort, money and resources just to try to duplicate a classic movie franchise - unless you give the team something better to fight against - and strive for - this time around.
Here's an overview of what a brand new sequel (NOT a reboot) could be:
A team of women Ghostbusters could, for example, NOT [like men tend to] shoot first, but ask questions: WHY is a ghost in disguise attacking us - and why now? Women are 'allowed' to show their feelings; use this too: at least one of the women is 'psychic'; she somehow 'knows' that the *apparently* evil ghost in disguise is actually an innocent victim - who wants the Ghostbusters to help bring her killers to justice.
The women would understand that the ghost 'stereotype' of mindless evil is wrong; *not* all ghosts are bad. Men might have a hard time with that concept.
See? Rather than putting down men, you could elevate women. And these women would have depth and purpose - not be just uncomfortable stereotypes who complain about a lack of wontons in their soup. The character of Patty could *seem* angry because she still has PTSD from her prior career in the US Army during our war with Iraq. So the film could show growth and improvement of the women characters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

TRANSFORMERSFANMar 11, 2021

this movie was not good! it ruined the original ghostbusters! and i rate this movie a 3/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

renohataMar 9, 2021

Simply not funny, not cool, not anything, just a waste of time. And I cannot believe I have just lost this time of my life watching it.
When compared to the original, it gets even worse, there is not anything that saves it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Mclovin69Jan 25, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just stop. Be more original next time, and stop rebooting everything. It doesn't work.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Sweeney-ToddDec 27, 2020

In an era of remakes and reboots, this ought to be one of the worst. I hope we can learn from this.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

Peacepiperf20Jan 5, 2021

I love how the critics scoring is so high like they're paid to write good reviews. Obviously...

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

SergeiZJul 19, 2020

A vulgar comedy with stupid jokes. Absolute squalor. And an indicator of the quality of the modern press, which, in connection with modern trends, high rated any men-hating product.
PS Greetings to all fans of the original dilogy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

FrostormNidheggSep 1, 2020

Чудовищный высер. Вот что случается, если не уничтожать малейшие ростки СЖВ.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

Scorpion1980Jul 19, 2020

fail in so many ways, seriously, i dont mind all female cast, but then the movies has to have a good story, this 'thing' sucked so bad.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

KaseywolJul 14, 2020

This movie is putrid garbage. The worst of of revisionist culture. Just avoid it. It is a waste of time and money and should not exist.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

salaghafJul 14, 2020

After careful consideration, and having slept on it for a night, I can definitely say that this is the worst film I have ever seen.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

Joex1977Jul 7, 2020

Holy Hell this movie was garbage. I was so bored and uninterested within 20 minutes of this train wreck. Is it really necessary for the yelling of most lines from Patty. I powered through this movie thinking it wasnt as bad as people say.Holy Hell this movie was garbage. I was so bored and uninterested within 20 minutes of this train wreck. Is it really necessary for the yelling of most lines from Patty. I powered through this movie thinking it wasnt as bad as people say. Hell no. It is crap of the lowest depths of hell. The antagonist is **** Long story short, DO NOT waste your time or money on this steaming pile of ****… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

DlorahSarrobJul 5, 2020

Cringefest, dumb characters and not funny at all. I couldn’t finish watching the movie.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

Wayfarer86Jul 1, 2020

Utter utter utter trash.

Forget even that this is a feminist political movie. Its a failure on every level. I cant even dignify it with further commentary. Ugh.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

snowinsaharaJun 19, 2020

Burning stinking foul SJW pile of garbage that should never have been made. Waste of everyone's time.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

PurekindJun 10, 2020

Yeah, this movie is genuinely garbage. I watched it a second time too if maybe I was too harsh but it turns out I was spot on, and in some ways maybe even kind. It's trash.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

dazsinJun 1, 2020

I'd heard all about the dreadful way this movie was conceived, but wanted to watch it with an open mind, free of all the controversy. But the movie is abysmal. In fact it's probably one of the worst movies i've seen in the past 10 years. It'sI'd heard all about the dreadful way this movie was conceived, but wanted to watch it with an open mind, free of all the controversy. But the movie is abysmal. In fact it's probably one of the worst movies i've seen in the past 10 years. It's shameless, it's crass, it's unfunny, it's complete nonsense.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

gt1967May 14, 2020

I think it was after reading critic reviews, then actually watching this film that I realised you really can't trust film critics anymore. I'm not sure what exactly their agenda is, however I'm pretty sure it's no longer about being honest.I think it was after reading critic reviews, then actually watching this film that I realised you really can't trust film critics anymore. I'm not sure what exactly their agenda is, however I'm pretty sure it's no longer about being honest. As this film really is extremely poor in every way. Dull characters, terrible script, poor storyline and absolutely no humour. Simply awful.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Jerych0May 1, 2020

Not funny. Not entertaining. With the budget given for this I expected a watchable movie. None of the jokes are funny, the characters aren't interesting or memorable. It's sad what happend with good movie

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

SrJoseHdezApr 20, 2020

Puedo ver una película sin que me metan ideologías feministas sin sentido.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Hawk321Apr 10, 2020

Dumb movie...so dumb... It's pathetic and dull...hell I can't even write a good review about it because it's soo dumb

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

PinballWizard94Feb 17, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The fact this film is certified fresh on Rotten Tomatoes is worrying to me because the film was everything but fresh. I'm not a fan of these all women cast remakes just because they seem very forced and gimmicky. Whatever happened to organic feeling female lead roles like Sigourney Weaver in the Alien series or Geena Davis in The Long Kiss Goodnight? From the start it was clear the humor wasn't going to be subtle, witty or clever and that instead it would substituted this with over the top, slapstick, haha-we-mentioned-Starbucks-how-relevant-because-that's-a-real-thing humor that films seem to go for these days. The whole thing was very confused - the cast all seemed to be constantly vying for the "funny one" spot which just created this very 2D experience, there was no variation in character, the bad guy was completely forgettable and un-intimidating, the story was very "meh". The only thing that was funny was the fact that Chris Hemsworth's character only managed to get the job as the ghosterbusters' receptionist because they found him attractive! Can you imagine for one moment if it was the other way around? Alas, it's an all women cast so it's "empowering". I'd like to comment on the plot a little more but it was honestly that forgettable. Overall, a waste of 2 hours and unfortunately I can't use that thing out of Men in Black to erase this from my memory.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

Tbone3uDec 17, 2019

Literal trash in every aspect. If you are a fan of the originals, do not waste your time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

DrKitsune87Dec 10, 2019

I love these ladies, they are so funny, really great comedians but this movie is a dumpster fire fueled by methane extracted from a hungover pig's **** The jokes are **** the story is **** the villain is **** the cameos are **** and it's moreI love these ladies, they are so funny, really great comedians but this movie is a dumpster fire fueled by methane extracted from a hungover pig's **** The jokes are **** the story is **** the villain is **** the cameos are **** and it's more than obvious that they did it for the paycheck. I still love these ladies and I love their comedy but this movie was made as a **** you' to the original story, cast and fans.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

LaroTayoGamingDec 7, 2019

Overall, the movie is relentously bad. I am a fan of Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters 2 because of the quirky comedies and real skits that we know and loved today, but the new 2019 one is literally dying out of all the known characters you knownOverall, the movie is relentously bad. I am a fan of Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters 2 because of the quirky comedies and real skits that we know and loved today, but the new 2019 one is literally dying out of all the known characters you known and love, whoever came up with this idea, is an a-hole.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

Eaj6Oct 8, 2019

As I always say, "Don't make what's old, new." As many movies and TV shows have possed in this new century is that there is never original movie work, just reproductions of timeless classics that can never be made again. I also wasAs I always say, "Don't make what's old, new." As many movies and TV shows have possed in this new century is that there is never original movie work, just reproductions of timeless classics that can never be made again. I also was disappointed at the idea of why are they making a movie on Ghostbusters with the original themes and stories just with a different gender of cast members. It's beyond me why the director, screenwriter or producer, could have done a movie on before they were the Ghostbusters or fans of the Ghostbusters who try to be in their image.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

Foxdie67Sep 13, 2019

You cast lively, talented women in one of the most loved franchises of all time under the banner of Sony. Why do a remake? Why do fart jokes? Why the incessant insult to the lore? You had such an opportunity, and this under the auspices ofYou cast lively, talented women in one of the most loved franchises of all time under the banner of Sony. Why do a remake? Why do fart jokes? Why the incessant insult to the lore? You had such an opportunity, and this under the auspices of promoting female lead characters. It’s actually a disservice to that cause. Do not watch. The writers shouldn’t be allowed on a movie again. Horrendous. No imagination. A quick cash grab by Sony.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

HipsterDufusJul 16, 2016

This was pretty bad. I was really bored overall and really had nothing of the magic of the original. Cameo appearances were nice but would have been better if they were the original characters. My wife and daughter enjoyed it a lot. ItThis was pretty bad. I was really bored overall and really had nothing of the magic of the original. Cameo appearances were nice but would have been better if they were the original characters. My wife and daughter enjoyed it a lot. It seems to be favorable among some women so I recommend it for a date night. The writing is really really weak.… Expand

75 of 102 users found this helpful7527

All this user's reviews

0

HollwoodlandAug 29, 2019

Nothing more than a "Girls can do it too" movie. Hey guys: taking a popular franchise and re-gendering it isn't clever, it's pandering.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

matsjohanssonMay 27, 2019

Im a fan of the ghostbusters series (well the 2 first movies at any rate) but this movie just made me sad, if I had been beaten up and told by half the population that I simply aint good enough I would probably be in a state fit to write aIm a fan of the ghostbusters series (well the 2 first movies at any rate) but this movie just made me sad, if I had been beaten up and told by half the population that I simply aint good enough I would probably be in a state fit to write a story such as this. You simply cant take the worst misonygist traits of old movies and turn it around, it lacks class and it makes for a horrible movie. It also lacks in writing, the first two movies basically had the same script and for the third they went and did the same - it does not work. You can do better, these actors are GOOD in other movies so its not their fault i think.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

JoeCoolMay 10, 2019

Why they made this movie is beyond me. It was bad, worse than just bad, it was really bad. It was ok like for the first 5 to 10 minutes, after that it's just all downhill if there ever was a hill to begin with. There is just nothing there, noWhy they made this movie is beyond me. It was bad, worse than just bad, it was really bad. It was ok like for the first 5 to 10 minutes, after that it's just all downhill if there ever was a hill to begin with. There is just nothing there, no chemistry between the actors, it's not even funny like ever, it's just a whole lot of fail and some special effects. Not a good thing for a comedy.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

0

gozer027May 2, 2019

This film is absolute trash. I liked the idea of an all female ghostbusters crew and the cast had great potential. But to make a reboot is just plain stupid. It could have been some kind of sequel that acknowledged and followed the originalThis film is absolute trash. I liked the idea of an all female ghostbusters crew and the cast had great potential. But to make a reboot is just plain stupid. It could have been some kind of sequel that acknowledged and followed the original films. But instead we got this pathetic joke of a film. What a waste of a great opportunity. Aside from the reboot nonsense, the plot is boring, special effects feel like its a childish made-for-tv-movie, the character's lines and development are contrived, flat, and foolish, the ghost busting equipment looks like stuff built out of garbage, and the HQ is a cheep filthy garage. This is not a ghostbusters film in any way other than by name.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

hollowMaskApr 30, 2019

Why?

This kind of hot mess is the reason Bill Murray refused to do another sequel.

For the love of god just go watch a decent comedy like Kung Fu Hustle

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

0

rtospeakApr 19, 2019

Painful to watch. There was so many high hopes mustered from me when they were talking about making the film. I felt like it was loaded with political agenda, bad writing and bad humour. Not worth the time, money and effort. My other half,Painful to watch. There was so many high hopes mustered from me when they were talking about making the film. I felt like it was loaded with political agenda, bad writing and bad humour. Not worth the time, money and effort. My other half, who is one of the biggest fans of Melissa McCarthy came to watch the film with me. Half way through the film she turned to me and said can we get our money back. After all the hype the film fell flat on its posterior.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

DerekReideApr 7, 2019

This is how you ruin an already completed franchise after its closing movie. A clear example is this film.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

Sven381Mar 17, 2019

Ghostbusters -> HORROR-Comedy
Ghostbusters II -> Horror-COMEDY
Ghostbusters (2016) -> Slapstick The basic Story is okay, not great, but the stories of GBI and GBII weren't great also. The visuals were technically okay, but the bubblegumGhostbusters -> HORROR-Comedy
Ghostbusters II -> Horror-COMEDY
Ghostbusters (2016) -> Slapstick

The basic Story is okay, not great, but the stories of GBI and GBII weren't great also.
The visuals were technically okay, but the bubblegum visual apperance is kinda crappy and anoyying.
The maincharacters were ... well not characters but female versions of Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy. What made Paul Feig hate women that much to make direction choises that bad?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

OdipidesMar 9, 2019

Dire!!
I would honestly rather have dental treatment than sit through this pile of junk ever again. If I don't live a good life I expect my personal hell to be strapped to a chair, eyes wired open and forced to watch this dumpster-fire forDire!!
I would honestly rather have dental treatment than sit through this pile of junk ever again. If I don't live a good life I expect my personal hell to be strapped to a chair, eyes wired open and forced to watch this dumpster-fire for all eternity.

With such an amazing premise and talented cast, this should have been a dead cert success. What the writers and directors were thinking is beyond me. High-school drama students would have churned out a better, funnier script that this cr*p.

Redeeming characteristics: It ends (eventually)

This is not a movie for watching, it's a movie that could be used as a cautionary tale for would be screen-writers and directors.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

RolandsGunFeb 26, 2019

This only gets three points because the cinematography and editing are fine. It's definitely a movie. Everything else falls flat; the plot, jokes, CG and ugly cameos from the original cast. The acting was like a series of SNL skits, nothingThis only gets three points because the cinematography and editing are fine. It's definitely a movie. Everything else falls flat; the plot, jokes, CG and ugly cameos from the original cast. The acting was like a series of SNL skits, nothing consistent.

I don't even think kids would be engaged by it, and considering the first joke in the movie is about queefs, it's probably not intended for them, anyway.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

paulraisedFeb 3, 2019

This had a huge potential to be a canon sequel and restart an awesome franchise. Having four women follow the path of the original ghostbusters was a great idea, Bill and Dan could have passed the torch on, but this movie like many recentThis had a huge potential to be a canon sequel and restart an awesome franchise. Having four women follow the path of the original ghostbusters was a great idea, Bill and Dan could have passed the torch on, but this movie like many recent others hides behind a so called empowering of female characters to get sales, and then it sets them up to fail. Sadly the director turned the movie into a bland senseless thing that goes nowhere for two hours. Kate McKinnon does a great job, and so does everyone else in the cast, with the exception of Melissa McCarthy who I find poor at acting and comedy. But the plot and its execution ruin everything for everyone. Paul Feig managed to get a commercial success out of some cheap movies in the past, and that's why he got to do this project, not because he's good at directing, or because he cares about female characters, or the ghostbusters fanchise. This whole thing has been depressing, I hope a new reboot can be created in the future that isn't as poor as this.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

Moviefan1991Feb 1, 2019

I didn't bother to see this film! That's all I have to say about the film. I love the original film from 1984 and the sequel from 1989, which is to me very underrated. I got laughs from those two and I will never see this hunk of garbage! II didn't bother to see this film! That's all I have to say about the film. I love the original film from 1984 and the sequel from 1989, which is to me very underrated. I got laughs from those two and I will never see this hunk of garbage! I didn't see it not because it has women. I didn't see it, because the trailer looked awful and I didn't like what was in the trailer.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

3

KarateBobJan 17, 2019

After the politically charge hype I didn't have much hope. When you sell social politics above story, the end product is inevitable. My fears were unfortunately confirmed. Average at best. Here's hoping for 2020.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

ingentingJan 9, 2019

A very bad remake that has an awful script, screenplay and direction. The jokes are not funny and every single actor in the movie seem like they don't care.. and neither should you.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

1

RudygerJan 6, 2019

One of the worst (big budget) movie I've seen in my entire film. Cringe, unfunny movie, trying to cash on SJW propaganda. Get woke, go broke.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

2

ArbitenDec 16, 2018

This movie is unbelievably sexist....to men! The constant ball kicking jokes is beyond unfunny. Not to mention that every male in the movie is a retard, one not even able to use a phone correctly. Unlike the original movies, these 4 girls areThis movie is unbelievably sexist....to men! The constant ball kicking jokes is beyond unfunny. Not to mention that every male in the movie is a retard, one not even able to use a phone correctly. Unlike the original movies, these 4 girls are amateurs and yet can accurately hit a pinpoint on a moving target whilst arcing the streams. In the originals, the ghostbusters would be shooting them everywhere and struggle to control their weapons. It was more believable that these were amateurs than this movie.

The special effects are good which is why is gets a 2, it's just the characters, story and world that is completely screwed up.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

ZahltagNov 28, 2018

This movie exists. Nobody asked for it, except one or two third wave feminists. The cast is diverse and politically correct (which means only women of all colors) and the humor is bad. To make it short: Unnecessary SJW propaganda.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

DanielMagnaNov 15, 2018

Ghostbusters 2016 is an odd movie, it promise a lot of ghost action, but instead of that there is only one ghost caught before go to the last boss. One of the best thing about the original movie is how it worked as a blend of a true horrorGhostbusters 2016 is an odd movie, it promise a lot of ghost action, but instead of that there is only one ghost caught before go to the last boss. One of the best thing about the original movie is how it worked as a blend of a true horror movie and a comedy, while 2016 feels very awkward and rough. A ghostbuster reboot fails not because the main characters are women, but a weak script and a poor direction… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

3

slider1983Oct 31, 2018

The 2016 movie feels like a parody of the original, a two hour Saturday Night Live sketch. Back in 2007 there was a ninety minute fan film called Return of the Ghostbusters which also followed a band of new recruits. If my memory is correctThe 2016 movie feels like a parody of the original, a two hour Saturday Night Live sketch. Back in 2007 there was a ninety minute fan film called Return of the Ghostbusters which also followed a band of new recruits. If my memory is correct it was set in Denver and had similar directing and story beats to Paul Feig’s movie. But that was a fan film and could be considered great to a point. I shouldn’t have to compare a multi-million dollar movie to something fans did for a quarter of a million almost ten years ago. This is a movie without logic. It does want it wants just because, without any thought as to what really worked in the original. This is a movie where members of an audience seem happier to use a selfie stick to snap ghosts than run away from them. This a movie where the villain uses the time travel of a portal to alter New York so it looks older. Why? I have no idea. The idea to disconnect from fans may of seemed like the obvious choice in that it brings in new fans however when you have a property that’s almost adored as much as Star Wars it may not be wise to go after just that other audience. What fans wanted and what would have made sense was a third movie that passed the baton onto a new set of recruits. This isn’t the GB movie we got and to misquote a certain Batman it’s not the movie the fans deserved either. What you’re left with is a movie that offends fans and is only likely to appeal to either Paul Feig fans or small children who never grew up with the originals. Before this film was released like many I wanted this movie to fail for the reasons mentioned in this review. However, having seen the new movie the anger I felt has turned to pity for everyone involved as well as the kids who grow up with this movie. Clearly everyone was trying, too hard it must be said but like the 90s animated series by design it was destined to fail and that’s worse than hating a film outright because it’s bad. I can’t totally hate the finished product because it desperately wants to be liked. The film would have been ok if it had been a spin-off movie but to bring back a semi-dormant franchise with this movie is a massive waste of time and money for self-indulgent political views that have nothing to do with the film’s story. Good intentions without suitable reasoning because at the end of the day why did it have to be Ghostbusters?! At least I can wrap up by saying the 90s animated series is no longer the worst thing to come out of the franchise. Faint praise I know. I never got to see an actual Ghostbusters movie in the cinema and it seems my childhood dream of doing so will have to wait. A stumble but hopefully one day the franchise will walk again, that’s what being a Ghostbusters fan is all about.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

0

SuperIsaias64Aug 16, 2018

This pretentious pandering display of feminist propaganda is enough to prompt the question, 'What day did the Lord create the rebooted Ghostbusters, and couldn't he have rested on that day too?'

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

ImissMYdinosaurAug 6, 2018

A contender for the worst film I've ever seen.
To be clear, I couldn't give two **** about the original and I'm anti-misogynistic. That is actually one of the reasons I hated it so much, the waste of talent on offer. The funniest women, nay,A contender for the worst film I've ever seen.
To be clear, I couldn't give two **** about the original and I'm anti-misogynistic. That is actually one of the reasons I hated it so much, the waste of talent on offer. The funniest women, nay, people on the planet in one of the most aggressively unfunny disasters. It truly feels like the writers room went out of their way to make it tiring and bland. I'm glad it empowered young women otherwise this turd had no business existing… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

UnholyGhostJul 13, 2018

'Atrocious' 'apalling' Great example of what what bad remakes movies are made of.I don't know why they wanted to do this it's really an insult to the masterpieces 1 and 2...it's unfunny. uncanny. bad jokes. It's an aobomination

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

0

MikefromAngusJun 30, 2018

this movie was a horror to watch! It was so bad! it was unfunny, unoriginal. avoid at all costs

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

0

FerCasalJun 27, 2018

First of all, I want to clear that I'm in favour of intelligent strong female lead characters, I love Alien and Aliens (Sigourney Weaver), the new Tomb Raider (Alicia Vikander), MCU and Lucy (Scarlett Johansson), Edge of Tomorrow (EmilyFirst of all, I want to clear that I'm in favour of intelligent strong female lead characters, I love Alien and Aliens (Sigourney Weaver), the new Tomb Raider (Alicia Vikander), MCU and Lucy (Scarlett Johansson), Edge of Tomorrow (Emily Blunt), Thor: Ragnarok (Cate Blanchett), just to name the firsts movies that comes to my mind, but this stupid SJW's new trend of trying to remake old classics, cult movies or just old movies with an all-female cast is unbearable, but the main point is not even about the all-female cast, the point is that they're traying to do it making real awful stupid movies, It's just that simple, if they do it with excellent stories and performances I support it, but this it's not the case at all (The same as Ocean's 8 and the new Star Wars movies, except Rogue One which I loved and validates my point), please, enough is enough.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

PupitoJul 15, 2016

Long time Ghostbusters fan. Haven't been into it that much since I was kid when I was bonkers for it. Even missed the 2009 video game.

I went in to this movie with high hopes and it was...fine? As a disposable summer comedy itLong time Ghostbusters fan. Haven't been into it that much since I was kid when I was bonkers for it. Even missed the 2009 video game.

I went in to this movie with high hopes and it was...fine? As a disposable summer comedy it was...adequate? As the long awaited follow up to Ghostbusters 2 it was...a total let down.

These very talented actresses did their best but they had no help from an awful script that was razor thin with a weak tea villain and a plot that held no surprises. Everything felt totally under cooked. And ultimately, it just wasn't that funny. I was willing to accept a totally different tone from the original movies if this was going to be side splitting funny but...I chuckled a few times?

If you want a mindless comedy you'll forget about as soon as the drive home then by all means pay to see this movie. If you love the originals then save your money and wait for it to drop on Netflix.… Expand

51 of 72 users found this helpful5121

All this user's reviews

0

Voodoo123May 19, 2018

Yet another hollywood money grabbing reboot. If this was somehow unconnected to the ghostbusters brand I could mark this up as a 5/10 effects movie, with a couple of popcorn munching chuckle-worthy moments to be had for sure. But GhostbustersYet another hollywood money grabbing reboot. If this was somehow unconnected to the ghostbusters brand I could mark this up as a 5/10 effects movie, with a couple of popcorn munching chuckle-worthy moments to be had for sure. But Ghostbusters 2016 aint that. Unfortunately this film lacks the will to commit to the scientific and paranormal sensibilities that made the original films. Paul Feig sacrifices all the limited screenplays dramatic opportunities to instead produce what is ultimately a shamelessly simple comedy effects movie for a quick cash grab.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

nooblox85May 11, 2018

Dude after i watched this i want to see some movie named Feminismbuster ffs i hate this movie what is this feminism theater? i hate you

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

0

wegie125Apr 19, 2018

The small things that made the original Ghostbusters so amazing was taken out and turned into nothing but a cash grab. Not only did they change everyone's personality but they also took away from the main plot. They made everything just aThe small things that made the original Ghostbusters so amazing was taken out and turned into nothing but a cash grab. Not only did they change everyone's personality but they also took away from the main plot. They made everything just a joke and yes, Ghostbusters was originall funny but at the same time it had a real plot that scared people. Of course we were younger then but the plot wasn't filled with just lame jokes and people acting stupid. It's annoying to see that their best jokes are people simply just getting hit in the face or stumbling. They don't make the same jokes and it just wasn't the same. I know that it isn't easy to recreate the feeling that people had when watching the first ghostbusters but keeping that in mind, they didn't even get close and they should have left the original movie as it was and just left it alone.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

0

pjaguilarMar 21, 2018

Crap all over the place. A poor attemps of making a political? statement, do it, just not in a movie ruining a franchise.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

0

wesker2012Mar 1, 2018

Incredibly bad. Completely destroys the soul of the originals. Total mess of a movie.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

2

KeithKFeb 28, 2018

Not good. Ghostbusters 2 wasn't the best, but at least it had the original cast, somewhat taking it seriously. (Ahem Bill Murray, I know people love you and I do to, as well as all of your movies, but this was abysmal)

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

boredboredboredFeb 28, 2018

So apparently "comedy" boils down to a black woman spouting racist, yet predictable quips, nut shots, and exposition delivered with all the elegance of a drunk hippo attempting ballet. This is bargain-bin junk. Avoid.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

Trey333Feb 17, 2018

How could you take a great classic and turn it into the Misandrogynistic mess. WHHHYYYY?

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

0

LuceDistanteJan 13, 2018

I just forced myself through this trainwreck just to see Murray and Aykroyd's cameos. What an useless waste of good money, of talent, of hundreds of people's time.

It's not racist, it's not sexist, it's not a story you want to have in yourI just forced myself through this trainwreck just to see Murray and Aykroyd's cameos. What an useless waste of good money, of talent, of hundreds of people's time.

It's not racist, it's not sexist, it's not a story you want to have in your memory. It's an insult to a generation.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

0

scootskeetDec 22, 2017

Sony literally gave this movie to me for free when i downloaded the new spiderman on itunes. It really is as bad as people have said. It just wasn't funny.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

3

JyroJyroSep 1, 2017

The cheesy half-witted feminist humour plagues this poorly written *remake*, although the enthusiasm of the new cast nearly redeems the script. Very disappointing when compared to the original...

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

3

Miles_SDec 3, 2017

an unfunny, stale, lazy movie that attempted to use politics as an excuse for it's many flaws, Hemsworth belongs in a much better film, preferably one that doesn't feature the insufferable and unfunny Melissa McCarthy, who seems to think shean unfunny, stale, lazy movie that attempted to use politics as an excuse for it's many flaws, Hemsworth belongs in a much better film, preferably one that doesn't feature the insufferable and unfunny Melissa McCarthy, who seems to think she is the greatest comedian of all time, similar to the movie, the main female cast, and the mainstream media. A travesty especially compared to the classic original.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

2

KaptenVideoSep 10, 2017

Wow, is this crappy or what? Downright the worst movie I have seen in a while. To add insult to the injury, managed to stumble upon an extended Blu-ray version which is 18 minutes longer than theatrical – whopping 134 minutes in all!
Yes,Wow, is this crappy or what? Downright the worst movie I have seen in a while. To add insult to the injury, managed to stumble upon an extended Blu-ray version which is 18 minutes longer than theatrical – whopping 134 minutes in all!
Yes, this is the all-girls-remake of the 1980's darling "horror comedy" franchise, this time starring Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, and, er, the other ones. Most of the original cast return with "surprise" cameos too, excluding, of course, the late Harold Ramis.
This is just a sad **** of a movie where everybody tries and tries for two hours and more, but nothing worthwhile emerges.
The only good thing I can think about the movie is that at least they have tried. For a long time, they try to make us laugh with their witty bantering dialogue and good chemistry but none of it materialises and the result is dead on arrival.
Alongside "Anchorman 2" and "Zoolander 2", this must be one of the biggest failures of recent times, where they tried to bring back some cult classic and just fell on their asses.
"Ghostbusters" is so bereft of laughs or joy that it feels **** even by movies starring Melissa McCarthy's standards, who's still desperately trying to define and recreate this little magic she managed to create in her breakthrough role in 2011's "Bridesmaids".
The same goes to Paul Feig, of course, who has mostly directed McCarthy's movies, the first and only creatively successful one being "Bridesmaids", of course. He should go back to TV world or something.
Rotten Tomatoes' and Metacritic's reviews are far too kind this time, the most telling would be the latter's user score of 2.9 out of 10.
The only bits I at least semi-enjoyed in the movie were original ghostbusters' surprise cameo appearances, and maybe Chris Hemworth as the good-looking but stupid assistant to the girls. He's the closest thing this "entertainment" had to offer to make me smile.
The visual effects look cheap too, although this may be some kind of homage to original movies.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

WhatdoyouthinkSep 7, 2017

Hyper silly punch lines, and hyper silly characters. The movie tries too hard to be funny; it oversells every joke, and delivers as many jokes in a row as possible to get any to land. Like all of Kevin's scenes are a string of ten jokes, andHyper silly punch lines, and hyper silly characters. The movie tries too hard to be funny; it oversells every joke, and delivers as many jokes in a row as possible to get any to land. Like all of Kevin's scenes are a string of ten jokes, and one will be funny, but it is immediately overplayed by nine other groaner jokes. It is so hyper jokey, that nothing is allowed to marinate. I smiled a few times, but every time it turned into a mess of cut up jokes that would make me frown. Cringe humor and hyper-talking humor works in some movies and much of tv comedy, but it did not work in this movie. The moment you start to think this movie could get good, with a few cool looking ghosts, or when the intensity picks up, immediately they kill it with silliness; like they thought it would be funny to have Slimer and his girlfriend ghost, but the joke doesn't end and they totally force them into the plot. The characters of ghostbusters step out of situations just to make a
joke, and make you lose the immersion of the situation. Kate McKinnon's character Holzmann eating pringles part is not just annoying for the forced product placement, but for the complete lack of the character's immersion. She continues eating pringles as a ghost is projectile-attacking Kristen Wiig's character as if she were watching a baseball game. Yeah I know she is aloof, but no reaction to the actual jump scare. This happens the whole movie. The audience needs to be pulled in by the actors, but the characters would never stop talking for two seconds to allow the situation or their expressions to make us laugh. (Except I like Patti's reaction with the ghost on her back.) The gadgets like pk meters and portal devices all look like plastic Halloween toys, and i actually thought the movie would reveal that they were just toys, but no, they were supposed to be real science. Bill Murry's cameo is even super lame in this. I would have been so disappointed in this movie if I was not already expecting it to be bad. I hope they try again, maybe another reboot.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

0

asijfhwrwerAug 17, 2017

**** this movie reviewer, why they give positive to this **** it already so ****ING BAD AS CAT POOP BEING CUT INTO 2 PIECES wait
dunnnnnnn
it a feminists propaganda wot ****tttttttttttttt SO THAT IS THE REASON WHY MOST THE MOVIE REVIEWER GIVE**** this movie reviewer, why they give positive to this **** it already so ****ING BAD AS CAT POOP BEING CUT INTO 2 PIECES wait
dunnnnnnn
it a feminists propaganda
wot
****tttttttttttttt
SO THAT IS THE REASON WHY MOST THE MOVIE REVIEWER GIVE THIS GOOD
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

revelcAug 8, 2017

What have they done to my favorite classic childhood film? They could've called this trash (I'm really sorry, I have to) Ghostbuster: Ladies in Action or something other than just Ghostbuster. Calling this Ghostbuster is totally disrespectfulWhat have they done to my favorite classic childhood film? They could've called this trash (I'm really sorry, I have to) Ghostbuster: Ladies in Action or something other than just Ghostbuster. Calling this Ghostbuster is totally disrespectful towards so many fans and definitely to the original. The writings, the casting, and the direction are junk. This movie was made purely to spit on men and to deny their roles. Women are beautiful creatures, they're smart, and unique. They definitely don't deserve to be put in this terrible propaganda film. I'd rather they cast some monkeys and cats.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

yersiniaAug 6, 2017

This movie is awful. The humour is clearly written by a woman. It's painful to watch. Who is the target audience? Why does every character have this **** attitude? We will never know..

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

0

FrenziedPandaH2Jul 19, 2017

Oh god....Weak, Impotent, not funny at all......A totally fiasco, I payed 7 dollars for this piece of....art ..............................................

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

ABCguyJul 16, 2017

The pacing is horrible, the CGI on the ghosts look horrible, the "jokes" were not funny and the characters are all not likeable at all. Save yourself the time and money.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

0

SkullsmashedJun 14, 2017

Misandristic, unfunny rubbish. All 4 female leads are trying to be Peter Venkman. Leslie Jones play a stereotypical black woman, rather than the Everyman character that Ernie Hudson did. Also, every male character is either an idiot, a cowardMisandristic, unfunny rubbish. All 4 female leads are trying to be Peter Venkman. Leslie Jones play a stereotypical black woman, rather than the Everyman character that Ernie Hudson did. Also, every male character is either an idiot, a coward or a pompous **** Do yourself & the viewing public a favour - don't watch this garbage.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews