Fury
Columbia Pictures | Release Date: October 17, 2014
7.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 815 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
598
Mixed:
145
Negative:
72
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
Kdog152Apr 22, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There were few moments that dragged on, but for the most part, pretty good film. This one's unique since they aren't constantly fighting throughout the whole film which lead to a more realistic story. The characters determination was heart warming. My only proper criticism is: Why did they all have to die bar one at the end of the movie? Just seems like they tried for nothing, though I guess that makes the movie more realistic as that's obviously what it was really like back in ww2.(so on second thoughts, I take the criticism back… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
CoreGamer1408Apr 5, 2023
I think a historical World War should never be glorified. I got a good sense of how a lengthy world war grinds peoples humanity down to the lowest point. That these people are living on the knifes edge of life and death on a daily basis. ThatI think a historical World War should never be glorified. I got a good sense of how a lengthy world war grinds peoples humanity down to the lowest point. That these people are living on the knifes edge of life and death on a daily basis. That something like a simple meal or a tiny moment of passion is as close to humanity they can feel. Fury shows how the war breaks some, how some do questionable things and how some question themselves. This film was not just about the sad meat grinder loss of life, but the other fatality of war losing one’s sense of humanity along the way. For all the Tank crew flaws they still did what needed to be done, because they got it. If not them then who? War is an unfair sacrifice on so many levels. I could not help, but empathize for the plight and sacrifice of so many people in Fury.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Pan_KrytykJan 3, 2023
Bardzo dobry film wojenny. Dobra gra aktorska i dobra reżyseria. Polecam... Na pewno ambitniejsze niż Marvel.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrPajamasDec 21, 2022
I loved it. Nicely shot, atmospheric war, suspenseful. Action packed in places and an unexpected ending for me. I'm very satisfied. I was also pleased with the cast. I'm glad Shia LaBeouf showed up outside of Transformers. Overall, a greatI loved it. Nicely shot, atmospheric war, suspenseful. Action packed in places and an unexpected ending for me. I'm very satisfied. I was also pleased with the cast. I'm glad Shia LaBeouf showed up outside of Transformers. Overall, a great movie for me and I recommend it to fans of war themes.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
BayernRalleOct 22, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. War crimes, „That german woman would probably **** you if you gave her a chocolate bar“.
Germans are unnoragnized idiots running into machinegunfire and 100-200 of them with Panzerfausts cant take out a single disabled american tank.
What in the actual ****.
Worst movie i‘ve ever watched.
0/10
**** you.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TOLVFCJul 11, 2022
The movie plot is sentimental, it was great and I like it. The cast were so talented
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JJ2FAS4UDec 29, 2021
----------------------------------9.0/10-----------------------------------
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
yungmuvMar 29, 2021
The ambiance, actors, and script work are good, but unfortunately it's a very ordinary plot, unrealistic movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
HistoryBuff69Feb 28, 2021
This movie would've ended at the Tiger or Pak40 scene. It's so incredibly unrealistic for a history movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
fmathezJan 30, 2021
Magnifique film qui montre la guerre sous un aspect particulier. Sans enlever l’horreur, la folie et le côté héroïque des événements.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
geewahJan 13, 2021
For a movie that is essentially about friendship, you need a cast that click, and that they have, in this atmospheric war drama.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
PraesiJan 12, 2021
The Amount of unrealistic BS Hollywood pushes down your throat in this Movie reached a new level in this ridiculous bad "Warmovie" StarTrek is less SiFi than this.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DogeGamer2015Dec 27, 2020
Una buena representación de la crueldad en la guerra; es emocionante y muy épica.
¡TOTALMENTE RECOMENDADA!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
DragoDoritsJun 29, 2020
Despite the talent of the David Ayer and Brad Pitt, this movie falls flat in almost every respect. I did enjoy parts of it, but overall the script is what kills it for me. There are excellent scenes that kept me engaged (two now that I'mDespite the talent of the David Ayer and Brad Pitt, this movie falls flat in almost every respect. I did enjoy parts of it, but overall the script is what kills it for me. There are excellent scenes that kept me engaged (two now that I'm thinking about it), but the dialogue is super cheesy, the characters are all one-note, and worst of all there are setups and ideas stolen directly from better films in the genre! No spoilers, but if you want an excellent WWII movie, Saving Private Ryan is a must-see. This movie does not need to exist.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
toxicDevilJun 9, 2020
Fury doesn't try to be much, it doesn't take a huge bite. But what it bites, it chews to near perfection. This film has amazing visuals. Action scenes are riveting, and cinematography is awesome. It just pulls you in and doesn't letFury doesn't try to be much, it doesn't take a huge bite. But what it bites, it chews to near perfection. This film has amazing visuals. Action scenes are riveting, and cinematography is awesome. It just pulls you in and doesn't let you go. Beautifully directed, Compelling action sequences - check. Steven Price you beauty! Price has composed an amazing score for this movie. Be it the action sequences or emotional scenes, the score elevates them to a whole another level. Stunning soundtrack - check. The main selling point of this movie has to be the emotions. There is so much emotion in this movie, seamlessly integrated, never overpowering. The 5 main characters are like a family, they have their disputes and problems, but always have each others' backs. When it comes to the mission they all are on the same page. The camaraderie amongst them has been beautifully portrayed by Ayer. All this is backed up by great performances from Brad Pitt, Shia Labeouf, Jon Bernthal, Michael Pena, and especially Logan Lerman, who gives one of his best performances ever. Powerful emotions with powerful performances - check. Probably the only flaw with this film is its pacing. We have a high octane action sequence which brings us to the absolute edge of the seat, but there is a huge slump after that before the momentum is gained. There is a 30-35 min scene which just drags a bit. Though being one of the most important scenes in the movie- 80% of character building happens in this scene- it just drags a bit too much, and all the momentum created is lost. Could've been shortened to around 25 mins. Fury takes a very realistic approach to war - it's gory, violent, and unforgiving. Not everyone is celebrated and given medals. Most of them don't want to be there and kill people, but they are made to. The film brings out the humanity and compassion of the fighters and soldiers. The humanity in these soldiers is the backbone of the film. Check out Fury for its amazing visuals, stunning soundtrack, strong emotions and realistic approach towards war. You won't be disappointed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MattKingsburyJun 8, 2020
Fury is an enjoyable movie, however it is unable to become anything more than that. Shia LaBeouf is without question the highlight of the film, providing a fantastically engaging performance that stands out from the rest of the cast, who areFury is an enjoyable movie, however it is unable to become anything more than that. Shia LaBeouf is without question the highlight of the film, providing a fantastically engaging performance that stands out from the rest of the cast, who are also strong, aside from Bernthal whose character is simply irritating and makes you want to put your head into a microwave. Yet halfway through the film seems to lose its way and tries to become something it's not: deep. The attempt to connect with the viewer falls flat, and leaves you begging for 20 minutes to be cut from the runtime. But the film picks up again and ends with a spectacular finale that satisfies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Jes131072Mar 23, 2020
War is ugly, dirty and pure chaos. Fury does a good job in telling that story. The bonds the tankcrew has is interesting and well told. Effects are good and the whole setting feels real.
But especially Pitts character is very one dimensional,War is ugly, dirty and pure chaos. Fury does a good job in telling that story. The bonds the tankcrew has is interesting and well told. Effects are good and the whole setting feels real.
But especially Pitts character is very one dimensional, and the final showdown is just plain stupid. The german troops behaves like stormtroopers in SW. Also I think they could have gotten more out of the tanks.
See Dunkirk if you want a 2WW movie that is good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Andyrew620Feb 24, 2020
The action scenes in this movie is one of a kind, very satisfying to watch. Yet the Germans were protracted as brain dead idiots who doesn’t even understand basic battle tactics. So the movie is definitely lacking a big chunk of logic. ForThe action scenes in this movie is one of a kind, very satisfying to watch. Yet the Germans were protracted as brain dead idiots who doesn’t even understand basic battle tactics. So the movie is definitely lacking a big chunk of logic. For instance (spoiler), the final battle in the movie, the German battalion couldn’t even destroy a single damaged tank without suffering a great deal of damage, and the battle drags on for a very long time, it’s just...... illogical.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
zNeverSleepingJan 14, 2020
Seguindo o proposito do filme, que é mostrar uma jornada heroica de americanos contra nazis, com foco no tank e, consequentemente, na ligação que isso causa na equipe, o filme funciona bem. Senti um estereotipo chato se tratando de algunsSeguindo o proposito do filme, que é mostrar uma jornada heroica de americanos contra nazis, com foco no tank e, consequentemente, na ligação que isso causa na equipe, o filme funciona bem. Senti um estereotipo chato se tratando de alguns personagens, como o religioso e o rapaz empático que não quer matar, e nessa altura do campeonato, é no minimo chato que ainda existam personagens assim. Se é pra apresentá-los da tal maneira, apenas os desenvolvam de maneira diferente, unica.

Fiquei com uma contradição na minha cabeça. O filme leva a guerra a serio, com cenários bem estruturados e um gore bem realístico, sem muitos exageros. o próprio eixo da equipe, o Don, mostra uma linha de raciocínio estrutural, onde demonstra entender a guerra e qual é o seu papel nela. Mas determinadas atitudes não condizem com isso. No filme todo, os americanos são glamourizados sem nenhuma profundidade. Os nazis são apenas um saco de pancadas inútil que toma bala o filme todo, com apenas um desafio na metade dele. Outra coisa foi a ligação do Don com o tank, que é incompreensível visto que não há desenvolvimento, exceto pelo "fury" escrito nele. Talvez quem fez esse filme achou o roteiro tão bom que começaram a acreditar nele.

Sei que o proposito do filme é vazio e que há pessoas que ainda gostam desse tipo de narrativa, e seguindo esse raciocínio, ele funciona bem. Mas não deixa de ser mais do mesmo.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
victorfogacaDec 14, 2019
Otimas atuações, fotografia e efeitos visuais. Peca um pouco no desenvolvimento do personagem Norman, e conta com um roteiro mediano pra bom.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TyranianSep 26, 2019
This is yet another pretty darn good war film with decent acting, good visuals and music and a gritty feel.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
HiganSep 12, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. É uma história muito boa, e conta de uma forma bem direta os horrores e os desafios da guerra. Guerreiros nunca morrem .… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TOMovieSep 7, 2019
對我而言，這部片之所以經典並不是擁有激勵人心的配樂，也不是槍枝、殺戮、爆破等大場面營造出的震撼，而是好的戰爭片都必定具備的：寫實。在充滿殘忍且不定性的戰場上最能展現出一個人的人性，而在如此殘酷的環境下仍保有良知也非容易之事。非常推薦！對我而言，這部片之所以經典並不是擁有激勵人心的配樂，也不是槍枝、殺戮、爆破等大場面營造出的震撼，而是好的戰爭片都必定具備的：寫實。在充滿殘忍且不定性的戰場上最能展現出一個人的人性，而在如此殘酷的環境下仍保有良知也非容易之事。非常推薦！
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
manningn15Aug 1, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is my favorite war movie and one of my favorite movies of all time. The cast gave phenomenal performances especially Brad Pitt, Logan Lerman, Shia LaBeouf, Jon Bernthal, Michael Peña, Alicia von Rittberg, and Anamaria Marinca. The cinematography was magnificent. The special effects were outstanding especially all of the explosions and gun shots and all of the wounds. The hairstyling and makeup were superb especially on Brad Pitt, Shia LaBeouf, and Logan Lerman. The writing and screenplay were terrific. The sound effects were fantastic. This was a great movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
bartcbemJul 31, 2019
Easily the worst WW2 themed movie I ever watched, and I saw plenty of them. There is pretty much nothing good I can say about it, characters are awful and pretty much flat caricatures. The story tries to be "realistic" but with the end sceneEasily the worst WW2 themed movie I ever watched, and I saw plenty of them. There is pretty much nothing good I can say about it, characters are awful and pretty much flat caricatures. The story tries to be "realistic" but with the end scene its simply ridiculous and unbelievable. Even acting falls flat with Brad being no exception. Also its hard to sympathies with a character who commits a war crime. Its more of a "video game in WW2 setting" than anything close to a proper movie.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
10
Jonmarch13651Jun 13, 2019
Best war film ever,every part of this film is amazing.Full of action and very motivating
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Dragonfly44Jan 21, 2019
Amazing acting and very powerful. It’s gruesome and although sometimes its painfully slow, its amazing all around. Rating - 77%
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DominArsenDec 8, 2018
Fury
Est un excellent film doté de scène vraiment ....
David Ayer à repris ce qui ce faisait de meilleur dans "Il faut sauver le soldat Ryan" et sa marche grandiose Des effets spéciaux qui reprenne l'univers de la guerre extrêmement bien onFury
Est un excellent film doté de scène vraiment ....
David Ayer à repris ce qui ce faisait de meilleur dans "Il faut sauver le soldat Ryan" et sa marche grandiose
Des effets spéciaux qui reprenne l'univers de la guerre extrêmement bien on dirait pratiquement la réalité (peux être a par les fumigènes).
Un Brad Pitt au meilleur de son jeu, a coté de sa prestation les autres passes pour des figurines
Des musiques qui collent au film.
Bref à la fin je me suis senti mal, mais émerveillé d'avoir vu un tel film.
Pour finir, il était difficile de faire mieux qu’"Il faut sauver le soldat Ryan", mais c'est réussi pour "FURY" Si vous éte fan de film de guerre je comprends toujours pas pourquoi vous regarder encore ce statut… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
BerikNov 6, 2018
If PTSD had a resumé, the tank divisions of the allied forces would be among the highest former costumers. Fury shows us once again one of the darkest pages in our history, and how this effect those who were at the front lines. It isIf PTSD had a resumé, the tank divisions of the allied forces would be among the highest former costumers. Fury shows us once again one of the darkest pages in our history, and how this effect those who were at the front lines. It is extremely entertaining to watch, and the actors do an excellent job at conveying their emotions. It earns an 8/10.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
amheretojudgeAug 19, 2018
to play safe by going under a war genre backfires vigorously..

Fury Fury is a character driven war drama about a troop that goes through various range of emotions whilst fighting against Germany. Pitt's urge to play safe by going under ato play safe by going under a war genre backfires vigorously..

Fury

Fury is a character driven war drama about a troop that goes through various range of emotions whilst fighting against Germany. Pitt's urge to play safe by going under a war genre backfires vigorously as the medium chosen in here doesn't necessarily respects or honors the sincerity of it. Having said that, the feature has its moments undoubtedly but unfortunately that too, is extracted from typical textbook formula. Stuffing in all such material to keep it alive and breathing for more than two hours, isn't feasible at all. Such familiar structured script with such safe acts are far away from being furious let alone be morally competent. If anything it is blighted enough to even take the heat out of the plausible work pulled of by the actors in here. The background score is dull along with editing and cinematography, but what draws the attention is gut-wrenching visuals; kudos to the art designing department, and sharp sound effects. The writing is more blunt than strong with coherent loud symbols (the dinner table conversation is where the line should have been drawn) that audience gets sick off, listening to. Ayer; the writer-director, is no short on execution and seems to have matured in its own method, no matter how long he still has to go to, to offer its own script some gravitas. Pitt is putting all his chips in with equal arrogance and raw power foliated in his portrayal with Bernthal's sassiness and Pena's reserved act, the feature is quite good on the performance objective. The chemistry among the characters and few comic action sequences (like Pitt's tank against a huge tank) are the only high points of the feature. Fury is of safer breed that completely contradicts its genre but then is also immensely gripping.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
The3AcademySinsJul 1, 2018
Fury is a gripping, sometimes touching, sometimes fun WWII film that follows an American tank crew across Germany in 1945. The characters and performances from the whole cast are great, and Brad Pitt and Shia LaBeouf give some of their bestFury is a gripping, sometimes touching, sometimes fun WWII film that follows an American tank crew across Germany in 1945. The characters and performances from the whole cast are great, and Brad Pitt and Shia LaBeouf give some of their best performances. The story is a little unbelievable, but this movie truly is an action movie, rather than trying to say something deep about WWII. The biggest flaw of Fury is that some scenes drag on way too long, and it feels like it pads the runtime, rather than truly finding meaning in the quiet moments. All in all, it's a fun movie to watch and not think too hard about.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
shag00Jun 16, 2018
Notwithstanding the ending which has been discussed extensively by others my biggest disappointment was the dialogue and to a lesser extent the wardrobe. What we have here is more a time travel movie than a WWII movie. It plays like a bunchNotwithstanding the ending which has been discussed extensively by others my biggest disappointment was the dialogue and to a lesser extent the wardrobe. What we have here is more a time travel movie than a WWII movie. It plays like a bunch of misfit Americans transported out of "the hood" and re-materialising on a WWII battlefield. I felt that the extensive use of modern idiom and hair styles really took away from a historically set movie.

I mean, we don't expect the latest Beh Hur to be presented in Latin or ancient Yiddish but we do expect language and idiom that is widely perceived to be in use during the time the movie is set. Just another unrealistic aspect of modern movie making that quite frankly is jarring.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SavageYetiJan 13, 2018
this movie was amazing and deserved to be nominated for best picture because this is one of the best war movies i have seen and i have seen many.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
JLuis_001Sep 6, 2017
It is true that the story of the film strikes the absurd, a team of five men in an American tank, surpassed by a whole platoon of German soldiers, plus the story shown in Fury never happened, its plotline that will be forgotten with a hugeIt is true that the story of the film strikes the absurd, a team of five men in an American tank, surpassed by a whole platoon of German soldiers, plus the story shown in Fury never happened, its plotline that will be forgotten with a huge speed.
It's just simple entertainment with failed depth.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MasterRileyDec 20, 2016
Fury is a war movie with a pretty interesting premise and good casting and performances all around. Good action and special effects too that made the movie really enjoyable to watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
mrdollarOct 16, 2016
Very very unrealistic scenario at the end ruin whole movie. Rambo seems way more realistic than this. You can't show enemy that stupid, one disabled tank can't take whole battalion. This tank would be destroyed in few first minutes of theVery very unrealistic scenario at the end ruin whole movie. Rambo seems way more realistic than this. You can't show enemy that stupid, one disabled tank can't take whole battalion. This tank would be destroyed in few first minutes of the "battle".

So many fake positive votes can't believe it.… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
6
TheArchetypesSep 9, 2016
Its actually not a bad film, but the ending ruins it. A trackless tank vs a whole SS squadron with anti tank weapons and the sort. It was a bit like watching an episode of He-man. One to avoid for the purists. But if you watch the first halfIts actually not a bad film, but the ending ruins it. A trackless tank vs a whole SS squadron with anti tank weapons and the sort. It was a bit like watching an episode of He-man. One to avoid for the purists. But if you watch the first half it isn't too bad.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
YoloSwag4DogeAug 15, 2016
The movie has good production value and it can be quite entertaining if you know nothing about WW2.

It's a ridiculous movie. In the tank battle the Tiger is all alone. Tigers always had infantry support and were accompanied by otherThe movie has good production value and it can be quite entertaining if you know nothing about WW2.

It's a ridiculous movie. In the tank battle the Tiger is all alone. Tigers always had infantry support and were accompanied by other tigers. Second, Tiger crews were highly trained and did not simply charge across fields into multiple enemy tanks. The crews took advantage of the Tiger's superior range and tried to position their tanks where they had a tactical advantage, ideally involving partial cover.

The final battle is simply ludicrous. SS units were highly trained and always had scouts ahead. They used flanking maneuvers and panzerschrecks to destroy tanks by firing at their weak points. SS troops did not simply charge into tanks getting mowed by machine gun fire.

I just couldn't get into it because of how much creative liberty was taken. It's more of a WW2 fantasy film than anything else.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
sherbzJun 2, 2016
Its actually not a bad film, but the ending ruins it. A trackless tank vs a whole SS squadron with anti tank weapons and the sort. It was a bit like watching an episode of He-man. One to avoid for the purists. But if you watch the firstIts actually not a bad film, but the ending ruins it. A trackless tank vs a whole SS squadron with anti tank weapons and the sort. It was a bit like watching an episode of He-man. One to avoid for the purists. But if you watch the first half it isnt too bad.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
aadityamudharApr 19, 2016
This film was a great war movie and was a really the best WW2 film I can think of to come out in the last 4 years about. The cast is great, Brad Pitt and all the rest making a great team and an interesting one, and even though this tank teamThis film was a great war movie and was a really the best WW2 film I can think of to come out in the last 4 years about. The cast is great, Brad Pitt and all the rest making a great team and an interesting one, and even though this tank team does have some typical characters you find in WW2 movies (the religious one, the trouble maker, the scared one, the battle hardened leader) they play their roles each so well that you really enjoying watching all their screen time. Effects look great and the film was deliciously savage in gore which I didn’t exit to be so brutal but it adds to the effect of the overall film. The direction can make you feel claustrophobic at times which may help add to the immersion of the men inside the tank but you do get to fully witness the battles that go on throughout too.
However, I did find some scenes a little clichéd and unnecessary to try develop characters but they didn’t properly detracted from the overall movie. Some of the unnecessary scenes did add to the characters but they seemed a little forced into the story and properly could’ve developed them in other ways.
Basically, go see this film for the chemistry and acting of the main tank men and for the full visceral immersion the film brings of tank fighting in WW2. It really does portray how bleak it was and how morally questionable us “good guys” in the war were. Good film, give it a watch.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
nosmaMar 27, 2016
I was reluctant to watch a war movie because theyre usually gory but this was a great movie I was captivated right from the beginning. Strong convincing screen presence by Brad Pitt, great supporting cast. I was determined to stay emotionallyI was reluctant to watch a war movie because theyre usually gory but this was a great movie I was captivated right from the beginning. Strong convincing screen presence by Brad Pitt, great supporting cast. I was determined to stay emotionally detached but I got sucked into the touching scenes and i could barely get through the heartbreaking intensity of the final half hour of the movie. Definitely on my list of great movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
EpicLadySpongeFeb 25, 2016
Fury has fury.... until some point of errors come in the way. Brad Pitt is perfectly fine for his part of the role and usually it would've, could've, and should've been better.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
BedlamFeb 6, 2016
Cliche and predictable, hitting on all the standard emotional trigger sequences. Either it was bad or I'm getting old, or both... sigh. Oh, and the end sequence is just unfathomably unrealistic. A stationary buttoned up tank would get plastered.
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
10
mattdillonGOPJan 8, 2016
How can a movie critic write a review of a serious movie without seeing it at least a few times. Fury is a serious movie, and one worthy of the time needed to watch it at least three times. A viewer needs to see Fury at least times toHow can a movie critic write a review of a serious movie without seeing it at least a few times. Fury is a serious movie, and one worthy of the time needed to watch it at least three times. A viewer needs to see Fury at least times to understand its genius. A critic should reveal his or her criteria about a film depend on the following: 1. is the story ; 2. the moral of the film; 3. the purpose of the film; 4. the acting; 5. movie quality; 6. focus of the film on the moral and the purpose; 7. realism and accuracy; 8. entertainment value; 9. is it memorable; 10. is the film worth the time it takes to watch it. Fury, in my opinion, is a great film, and one of the greatest war films ever made. (For comparison, I give high grades to Paths of Glory, Saving Private Ryan, Attack!, Breaker Morant, The Grand Illusion.) The main character in Fury is Don "Wardaddy" Collier, an American staff sergeant who is a tank commander and who speaks German. The men in his Sherman tank, which is a death box, look to him for leadership and to save their lives. Sgt. Collier longs for a normal life, even though he is living a life of hell: continuous death, savagery, human degradation, cruelty, capriciousness. In spite of his combat skill and experience, Sgt. Collier is only human. He tries to escape by himself to think, to breath deeply, and to find a normal life. During the middle of the film, Collier and Private Norman Ellison (Logan Lerman) find two German women, an aunt and her niece in a second floor apartment. Collier creates a scene reminiscent of a breakfast with the husband and wife. Collier manages to clean himself somewhat and shave. He gives six eggs to the German woman, who cooks breakfast for her niece, Lerman (Pvt. Norman Ellison) and Collier. We see Collier reading the newspaper, smoking, and drinking coffee. Norman, who is the most educated and cultured of the tank crew -- and the most inexperienced and naive -- plays the piano and has an innocent encounter with the niece. Collier has found his peace in this hideous war. Yet, not for long, as the three member of his crew -- Grady (Jon Bernthal), Gordo (Michael Pena), and Bible (Shia Lebouf), adulterate Collier's serenity. Grady presents as avaricious and amoral; Gordo has similar traits as Grady, but slightly less so; Bible presents as a devout Christian, who kills as necessary, even as he preaches the Christian Gospel. The movie graphically portrays tank living and tank death. (Many US soldiers died hideous death in Sherman tanks, which were no match for the German Tiger tanks.) Fury also reveals an American army that has forgotten the rules of war as it applies to the German SS. The time of the film is April 1945. The Germans have all but lost the war; however, they will not quit: they fight ferociously to protect their land, Germany. Collier and his crew know that the war will soon end. Yet, what is their duty? Does the approaching end of the war change their attitude and their actions? Collier and his men will decide how they will end their part in this war. Fury is entertaining throughout. It graphically and accurately portrays tank battles and fighting. It shows the decisions soldiers must make, and how they accept their almost certain death. I do not know how David Ayer could have written or directed a better war film. I rate this film a 10.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SmoothrunnerJan 6, 2016
"We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn: But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind, So we left them to teach the Gorillas"We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn: But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind, So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind." (The Gods of the Copybook Headings by Rudyard Kipling)

War, as it is - even a little bit embellished - dirty and ruthless.

To understand what "Fury" is and why all were so and not otherwise, you should look back a little, and then look around.

After the "humiliating" for the "imperial nation" Treaty of Versailles, Germany rather quickly disillusioned in liberal democracy of the Weimar Republic. Although after the hyperinflation economy finally stabilized, but only to be immediately "decimated" by the global economic crisis. New energetic leader and disgruntled by the defeat in the Great War military leaders whispered to Germans about betrayal, conspiracy of treacherous West against Germany, which was not defeated on battlefield and capitulated only due to the cunning and treachery of the liberal politicians. And the Third Empire began to "get up off its knees" under active and simply tacit approval of the German people, who listened enthusiastically every word their charismatic leader said.

"They are prophesying to you false visions, divinations, idolatries and the delusions of their own minds" (Jer. 14:14).

With its "special path", the bearer of an "unique Aryan gene", Germans, according to the Fuehrer was the only beacon of civilization, against which the rest of the world fought. But now Germany is as strong as ever. Western leaders, all these "Daladier and Chamberlains" were despised by Hitler as weak-willed and cowardly. They "swallowed" the Austrian Anschluss, the annexation of the Sudetenland, the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia, accepted the infamous Munich Agreement. Meanwhile not confined by liberals and democrats and not burdened with the "bourgeois morality", the energetic leader behaved with unprecedented arrogance and rudeness. Together with his teacher from the East, he dismembered Poland. Then easily captured France. There only a defiant England left with this funny old man Churchill. Authoritarianism, when critics "do not rock the boat" with the stupid "democracy", confirmed its benefits - at that time, as democracies swayed in doubts, authoritarianism confidently went forward.

"There are no innocent. There are only varying degrees of responsibility."

Meanwhile Jews were murdered in the gas chambers, from the East echelons of slaves arrived in Germany, while remaining were treated almost as mercilessly as by the Soviets. And all this is either with the active support of, or with the acquiescence of, or even indifference of the German people - finally "raised from their knees." "There are no innocent" - everyone took part in building of the Third Reich - someone shot, and someone produced shells. Difference only in the degree of responsibility. They're not going to give up - "carriers of unique gene" are invincible in battle, they have a "wonder weapon" and a great leader.

"Each person can err, but to persist in error is peculiar only to fool."

Germans did not give up - they lived in a fictional reality of Goebbels's propaganda by which they were not deceived, but which gave them a great opportunity to deceive themselves and to ignore reality. Lie was their truth. But reality, even if it does not noticed, does not cease to be reality - "brilliant" leader who's "effective" government wasn't restrained by the "democratic criticism", quickly braked his country's neck, exactly because of the lack of democratic criticism, which may have returned him to reality. He also lived in illusions.

"And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins, As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn, The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!"

So, the reality that the Germans were so hardly trying to keep out of their doors, hiding behind the veil of propaganda lies, furiously smashed the doors of German homes, destroyed walls, killed old people and children, raped women, murdered men - actively supporting, tacitly endorsing or simply indifferent. It turned out that there is truth, despite all lie's efforts to hide it. And if you do not give up in your misconceptions, if you persist in lies - the truth will burst violently, relentlessly, destroying all in its path - there will be no innocent!

This applies to the past and to the present. "Fury" is a reminder to all about the price of "mistake" and persistence in delusions. Everyone will pay for the "mistake" - active and silent and indifferent - and payment after collision with reality will be cruel. Yet another "imperial nation", disillusioned in liberal democracy now tries to hide from reality under the curtain of lies. Russians believe that they have been never defeated by the West on a battlefield, and Soviet Union would have been victorious if not for the West conspiracy. They believe that Russians are bearers of the unique "genes" and are only beacon of civilization in the declining world. They despise Western leaders, considering them weak. Russians adore their charismatic leader - Putin. They are happy with the annexation of the Crimean peninsula, murder of thousands of Ukrainians and destruction of Donbas, boasting to turn USA into radioactive dust. They are leaving in illusions, considering themselves innocent. Yet their collision with reality is inevitable.

"As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man — There are only four things certain since Social Progress began: — That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire, And the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;"… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
DanishReviewDec 18, 2015
This movie is amazing!
I love how they introduced Norman, as just Another soldier, who got reassinged, you follow him, and the tank, "Fury", as they march through nazy Germany in the close end of the war, you experiense how he is breakingThis movie is amazing!
I love how they introduced Norman, as just Another soldier, who got reassinged, you follow him, and the tank, "Fury", as they march through nazy Germany in the close end of the war, you experiense how he is breaking down, that he cant take war, it just give us another reason to stop war all together, it proves that not everyone wants to shoot a surrendering soldier, or a fighting one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Filip97Dec 11, 2015
Not bad but not very great either. It feels a bit cliché at times. The perspective through a tank during a world war mission is not something you see everyday so that's interesting and fascinating. The action scenes are thrilling and wellNot bad but not very great either. It feels a bit cliché at times. The perspective through a tank during a world war mission is not something you see everyday so that's interesting and fascinating. The action scenes are thrilling and well done. The characters were a bit cliché but it doesn't stop the actual performances from being good. I enjoyed every single performance. After a somewhat non surprising end (IMO), I kind of sat there feeling a bit empty, like there was something missing. It's still a solid 7. Above average war action-drama but not in the level of Saving Private Ryan.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CineAutoctonoDec 5, 2015
Fury a historical war film about the Second World War , which turned good , especially when they tried to survive the war and only one did, not done me nothing but good plot and good action scenes , a movie a bit rude but decent in the past
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
5cipi0Nov 2, 2015
Not especially worth paying for. The first three quarters of the film is good: character development, scene setting, emotional engagement, realistic and cinematically well-produced action. The last quarter is disappointingly weak, withNot especially worth paying for. The first three quarters of the film is good: character development, scene setting, emotional engagement, realistic and cinematically well-produced action. The last quarter is disappointingly weak, with limited engagement of any sort, an unnecessarily long and unrealistic scene at the end and none of it emotional enough to make its own statement about the experience endured to make up for the rest.

Individual performances are excellent, credible and engaging; equally, particular scenes are rare treats that explore unusual facets of the combat experience and the contradictions that accompany it. Overall, I would recommend it to a friend for the first three quarters, but only when it came to network TV.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
HowmasterSep 10, 2015
It was really good up until the last 30 minutes which ruined the film. It seemed to have a bit of realism in showing how some US soldiers could be ruthless not just the enemies. The tank battles were interesting, however, it always seemedIt was really good up until the last 30 minutes which ruined the film. It seemed to have a bit of realism in showing how some US soldiers could be ruthless not just the enemies. The tank battles were interesting, however, it always seemed like the German tank crews were incompetent in that they couldn't hit squat. Brad Pitt and the other characters were well played.

That being said, the last 30 minutes of the film is all unrealistic action and ruined what was a good film.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
MeritCobaSep 9, 2015
Whenever a Tiger I tank and SS troops appear together in a movie you can bet the federal gold reserve on it that this movie is not about historical accuracy. This doesn't mean that Fury has no a sense of historicity, but world war II moviesWhenever a Tiger I tank and SS troops appear together in a movie you can bet the federal gold reserve on it that this movie is not about historical accuracy. This doesn't mean that Fury has no a sense of historicity, but world war II movies are actually never about world war II but about the spirit of the time they are made in. If you don't believe me, just (re)watch Kelly's Heroes and compare it to Saving Private Ryan.

The spirit of Fury isn't a pretty one if we are to take our queues from the crew that operates her. During most of the movie they never display any redeeming quality that would endear them to us, they are a truly sad crew. We have reached the bottom of the well as far as humanity goes. Even Apocalypse Now isn't as gloomy as this one. These are dark times were the best are the worst or the other way around. Well, not as bad as the enemy perhaps, who even hang their fellow country women for refusing to resist the invaders in a time that resistance is futile, but as bad as can be and only marginally so.

The key scene is one where Brad Pitt together with Rookie invade a house where two German women hide out. it is one long protracted threat scene that screams rape with every frame. If you have seen Der Untergang, or have read the Last Battle by Cornelius Ryan, you will be aware of how these women would have felt. It isn't a pretty sight to behold.

Fury has a scary anchor point, which is that it doesn't matter what you do as long as you do it, because you have been told to do it and nothing else matters. It reminds me of a phrase of the game Mafia II: in the war the president pointed the finger at whom to kill, now it is the hand that pays me. This movie is thus about moral bankruptcy.
In a human society there is no place for any of the crewman of Fury with an exception perhaps for the rookie who is the least tainted. Society can not work with the scumbags that war has created, and who have traded in their morals and compassion for the command: go forward and kill regardless.

They are the walking dead.

It just needs a bullet to remind them that they are.… Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
10
thunderball001Aug 27, 2015
'A Pure War Movie' that does not only give a raw depiction from the horrors of war, but offers a whole new perspective of fighting, breathing and clinging onto life within the confinements of a tank. The men its holds are faced with daunting'A Pure War Movie' that does not only give a raw depiction from the horrors of war, but offers a whole new perspective of fighting, breathing and clinging onto life within the confinements of a tank. The men its holds are faced with daunting challenges and deep morals that truly sparks a whole new meaning to war that has never been seen before in films. The acting is stunning, the action is pure and yet maybe over the top but let me ask you this. Have you been in war? Have you faced war in the face? Have you lived war? If the answer is 'No', then this film will be as close to any other war film that will you put into the cockpit of hardship, loss and regret. It is so much more than a war film.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
grandpajoe6191Aug 27, 2015
"Fury" isn't a terrible to be honest; Brad Pitt gives a veteran performance to really flavor up the movie. However, the film heavily suffers from the usual war-movie formulas with tear-jerking squad/ protagonist death sequences we've all seen before.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
LoroshowAug 20, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. É um filme que não tem tanta riqueza de cenas. Eles passam a maior parte do tempo dentro de um tanque de guerra. As cenas não conseguem emocionar tanto. O final deixa a desejar. O que salva o filme é a boa ação e o momento que ele é retratado, pois lembra a batalha contra Hitler.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
cliftonrainAug 10, 2015
One of the best Brad Pitt movies I seen in years. Fury grabbed me and it never let go. It was so good I had to see it 2 more times and still loved it. The performances were spectacular and theme soundtrack was amazing.
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleJul 18, 2015
Fury is a film that incredibly brutal and intense at times, but manages to be a stirring and emotional war film throughout due to its focus on brotherhood and the friendships formed during war times. The direction from David Ayer was greatFury is a film that incredibly brutal and intense at times, but manages to be a stirring and emotional war film throughout due to its focus on brotherhood and the friendships formed during war times. The direction from David Ayer was great here and the war/action sequences were expertly put together. Ayer has a knack for some real great action sequences and Fury is no exception to that. Brad Pitt, Shia Labeouf, Michael Pena, and especially Logan Lerman, were all stellar in their respective roles. The costume design and makeup in the film were also very great as these men look the part and look war battered. However, where Fury is the most successful is in the realism. Incredibly faithful to reality, the film feels authentic, especially when it comes to the blood and gore of war. As a whole, Fury is no Saving Private Ryan, but is definitely the best war film in a while and stands as a very good film in what was a great year for film in 2014.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
Meth-dudeJul 18, 2015
Thanks to the non-stop action,the believable acting,the great action sequences and the really good visuals, Fury is never boring.Even if there is some minor plot holes, this is still a pretty solid movie.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
MustisTheCatJul 9, 2015
Don`t kill me. I`m a history buff and I love this movie. If you`re an Average Joe, just substract 1 from the rating and you`re good.

Wanna watch a movie? Don`t see any trailers, don`t read any reviews, just go watch it and make your ownDon`t kill me. I`m a history buff and I love this movie. If you`re an Average Joe, just substract 1 from the rating and you`re good.

Wanna watch a movie? Don`t see any trailers, don`t read any reviews, just go watch it and make your own opinion. I did just that when I heard about Fury. I was surprised it was so good.
At first knowing that a top Hollywood actor would take the main role and GASP...LaBeouf and Lerman, I didn`t expect much. But I was wrong, the scenario has put a good weight on the story rather than the men involved. So Pitt is excellent (I want that haircut!!!), LaBeouf gets minimum camera time and Lerman is kept mainly in the background.
Instead the story focuses on the events which is last year of World War II. My favorite tank, the Sherman Firefly with the 76mm long barrel cannon and YES YES YES, the Panzerkampfwagen VI namely THE TIGER I with the 88m cannon. I would watch this film 20 times for the Tiger scene alone, it is so well made. Actually the last tank battle so well made I watched last was the "Kelly`s Heroes" bit.
As a whole I think this movie is extraordinary for showing what the World War II really was : killing people, explosions, dirt, pain and fear of dying on a daily basis. No sentiment, just war. Even in 1944 it was hard for the Yanks to fight their way into 3rd Reich as they were faced by nazi fanatics.
I found the story to be silly but the actual last scene I liked for the fireworks.
That said, when I think what a normal viewer would get out of this movie...maybe an image closer to what World War II really was (but still a tad bit unrealistic, you know, the tracers, meh).
Nevertheless, a good addition to film library for every history buff out there.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
chepod8Jun 12, 2015
Historias de la II Guerra Mundial creo faltan bastantes por contar, lo interesante es que esta deja de ser parte del montón al ser una operación suicida a todas luces.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
sanyrubJun 6, 2015
Good film with better performances than expected (Brad Pitt being the blandest one as usual) and a pretty intense experience these soldiers go through in their tank (Fury). After so many World War II films it is nice to see we still can haveGood film with better performances than expected (Brad Pitt being the blandest one as usual) and a pretty intense experience these soldiers go through in their tank (Fury). After so many World War II films it is nice to see we still can have new things to tell. The kid from Perks of being a Wall Flower is fantastic here. Good war film.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
SwegJuceJun 1, 2015
Fury was intense, gritty, realistic, and dark. An experience that any war movie should aim to deliver. A must watch, especially with some good theatre speakers.

The acting was nothing exceptional, but the visuals and sound... damn, theFury was intense, gritty, realistic, and dark. An experience that any war movie should aim to deliver. A must watch, especially with some good theatre speakers.

The acting was nothing exceptional, but the visuals and sound... damn, the SOUND!
Watching this in a theatre was like no other experience. The sound of bullets whizzing past, a shell ricocheting off the armour - I've never heard these seemingly generic war movie sounds, done so masterfully. The thumps of mortar shells exploding next to the tank, travels through your chest and makes you feel like you're actually in the tank.

Some intense scenes with great realistic visuals left me tearing my seat's armrests out. Not only that, but they also used REAL Tiger and Sherman tanks!

Gory. Not just artistical gore like in 300, but some creatively done realistic gore. Makes you realise that war is nothing glorious or romantic.

Verdict: Loved it!… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
mascJun 1, 2015
Total historical nonsense! But even if you put that aside it is one of the worst war movies ever produced. I do not understand why Brad Pit is playing in this movie. Maybe he needed the money. :-P
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
7
Epik_NinnjaMay 23, 2015
This movie is centered around a crew fighting in a tank in World War II. It takes pieces form various veteren's stories of the war and makes it into one brutal war movie about loss and about dealing with what soldiers have to do in war. TheThis movie is centered around a crew fighting in a tank in World War II. It takes pieces form various veteren's stories of the war and makes it into one brutal war movie about loss and about dealing with what soldiers have to do in war. The main character is a boy (well, a very young man) who got transfered from typing about the war to fighting in a tank. The emotions he goes through are displayed well by the superb acting (everyone's acting is well done). I'd recommend this movie to any fans of World War II movies.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
TheQuietGamerMay 7, 2015
A WW2 film that isn't just about blood and guts. While there is plenty of tense, violent combat the focus is more on how it affects the soldiers involved. In the beginning of the film we are introduced to a tank crew who has just lost a manA WW2 film that isn't just about blood and guts. While there is plenty of tense, violent combat the focus is more on how it affects the soldiers involved. In the beginning of the film we are introduced to a tank crew who has just lost a man and have been beaten down by the war. They're tired, irritated, and more than just a little bit sick of each other. Then comes in rookie "Norman" (Lerman) who whose innocence is at odds with the psychologically tormented crew of M4 Sherman tank "Fury."

The movie isn't afraid to show you just how messed up these men have become. They are all superbly cast. Their actions are believable. The war has changed them into vulgar, almost completely unfeeling people. There are moments here that show that the U.S. soldiers weren't just heroes going into Germany and that they showed genuine hate not just towards the Nazi army, but towards German people as a whole.

It's more of a psychological war film. Yet near the end it turns into your predictable war film. With heroic sacrifices and a long, bloody conflict. The action and gore are cranked up to 10 making it feel more like what you would expect from a war film. It packs the same emotions you could expect from a WW2 film since "Saving Private Ryan" came out and changed the game. Mix that with the fact that you can totally predict how things are going to turn out for Lerman's character and you have a film that feels a touch familiar.

However it's views in the psychological effects of war and attention to detail in regards to combat from behind the controls of a tank make it worth a watch. It's a little bit more than your average war film. With a cast this excellent they would have had a hard time not succeeding even if they did just go for a straight up generic WW2 film. However they went the extra mile and gave us a new take on war combat by showing us tank warfare and taking a look on how war effects people's mentalities. A few familiar aspects of war films are hanging around, but the majority of it is a fresh take on the genre.

I give "Fury" an 8.3/10.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
reroninMay 5, 2015
Cool movie it has couple of good scenes . But then you look at the Natzi Solidares and they all are Dumb .. And that really switched this movie from . Epic war movie to dumb down war movie.

This movie could be Das Boot with Tanks if theyCool movie it has couple of good scenes . But then you look at the Natzi Solidares and they all are Dumb .. And that really switched this movie from . Epic war movie to dumb down war movie.

This movie could be Das Boot with Tanks if they fixed some things . Mainly im talking about the fight scenes with the enemy . In this movie Germans in one scene have RPG's but they never use them against a tank. After the tank stops shooting to change the ammo .. Natzi still shot but still don't use the rpg's. Only later you see the RPG's being upacked . But you see in previous scene many soliders hold them on their back.

Basicly this movie has too much the standard Round around do nothing can't aim enemy cliche overuse. And that is because the fight scenes are poorly writen.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
SkulbApr 19, 2015
This is plenty romantic I would argue, to those who pretend there`s something of substance being conveyed in Fury. Cameraderie and merry barbarism in the field, just like when we plundered Baghdad for no reason and hauled old women out intoThis is plenty romantic I would argue, to those who pretend there`s something of substance being conveyed in Fury. Cameraderie and merry barbarism in the field, just like when we plundered Baghdad for no reason and hauled old women out into the street at gunpoint. Blah blah blah. It`s apparently the destiny of young, moronic American males to be brainwashed into loving war so they`ll sign up the next time there`s an oilfield DC wants to steal. The acting here is good to be fair. But that`s about it. The usual sentimentality and all the conversations no one ever has while being on the front you apparently need to make a Hollywood fiction. Not only that but we`re gonna lock five dysfunctional Americans inside one of the worst tanks produced in WWII and they`re gonna shoot up half the German army all by their lonesomes. Because Hollywood knows history!

The last good US WWII movie I saw was When Trumpets Fade. And this movie does not change that stat. Worth a watch if you don`t care about historical accuracy at all and are starving for a WWII movie. Otherwise I`d give it a miss. If you do be prepared for lots of fake ambiguity of the classical war romanticist kind, pioneered in later decades by Steven Spielberg.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
mustard_tigerApr 9, 2015
Total ****

Not one single second of original movie here, its like they took a bunch of BS move tropes and blended them together. Then drank the trope smoothie, **** it out and that's how this movie was made. Watch anything before youTotal ****

Not one single second of original movie here, its like they took a bunch of BS move tropes and blended them together. Then drank the trope smoothie, **** it out and that's how this movie was made.

Watch anything before you see this, I know you are thinking what I thought. Hey its a WW2 movie about tanks and I like thanks. Could be cool to see tanks in action in nice HD, I heard they used a real tiger.... don't fall for that. Well if you do, download it and skip ever scene that doesn't involve a tank.… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
2
jakjonesMar 31, 2015
Awful, war porn, unrealistic....................................................................................................dont bother.....................pitt sold out yrs back............................yuk
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
homer4presidentMar 11, 2015
I'm not sure what to say when it comes to David Ayer's latest film "Fury". It's a movie that rides fine line between mediocre and good. There were moments when I realized how great this film could have been, but those split-seconds wereI'm not sure what to say when it comes to David Ayer's latest film "Fury". It's a movie that rides fine line between mediocre and good. There were moments when I realized how great this film could have been, but those split-seconds were sparse. It's not as it it's particularly unpleasant, it's just not anything new, and none of the characters stuck out to me.

The plot is pretty commonplace, set in the heart of World War II. We follow Brad Pitt's character, a battered sergeant nick-named 'Wardaddy' who has his hands full commanding his five-men crew in their cramped tank. Dealing with the harsh realities of war and a new man abroad, a young soldier who hasn't been properly trained, they're forced to fight outnumbered and outgunned.

The movie is exactly what you might expect and that's probably why I didn't enjoy it. I was able to predict every move, all the down to each character's arc, and it wasn't an original experience in any way. It felt as it they went down the list of every great war film collecting each trope they could and threw them in as needed.

The most redeeming factor is the cinematography but the other aspects can't match it's greatness. The acting is fine, with Brad Pitt and Shia LaBeouf bringing the most to the table. If you're a fan of the genre, you'll probably like this, but I'd recommend skipping it and revisiting classics like "The Bridge on the River Kwai" or "Patton".… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
MarickMar 11, 2015
War, war is a great movie story for a movie, for me. I think is one of the best movies. Story is a psyhological experience of warfare.. So, for me, it's a good movie.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
AGYPMar 10, 2015
Quite a lame movie, bad story line, unrealistic shootouts, to drawn out, bad script. Was interesting in that it was the first such movie I'd seen with tanks from that angle.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
emlugo123Mar 8, 2015
The movie is okay, I liked it BUT there was one part in the middle of the movie where it just dragged on and on. And the ending is very predictable but other than that I enjoyed it.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
vikesh2206Mar 7, 2015
Well acted, raw and visceral, the grim toned Fury is as hard hitting as its title suggests, portraying a gruesome look at both camaraderie and battles during WW2.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
oDjentoMar 5, 2015
This film was a great war movie and was a really the best WW2 film I can think of to come out in the last 4 years about. The cast is great, Brad Pitt and all the rest making a great team and an interesting one, and even though this tank teamThis film was a great war movie and was a really the best WW2 film I can think of to come out in the last 4 years about. The cast is great, Brad Pitt and all the rest making a great team and an interesting one, and even though this tank team does have some typical characters you find in WW2 movies (the religious one, the trouble maker, the scared one, the battle hardened leader) they play their roles each so well that you really enjoying watching all their screen time. Effects look great and the film was deliciously savage in gore which I didn’t exit to be so brutal but it adds to the effect of the overall film. The direction can make you feel claustrophobic at times which may help add to the immersion of the men inside the tank but you do get to fully witness the battles that go on throughout too.
However, I did find some scenes a little clichéd and unnecessary to try develop characters but they didn’t properly detracted from the overall movie. Some of the unnecessary scenes did add to the characters but they seemed a little forced into the story and properly could’ve developed them in other ways.
Basically, go see this film for the chemistry and acting of the main tank men and for the full visceral immersion the film brings of tank fighting in WW2. It really does portray how bleak it was and how morally questionable us “good guys” in the war were. Good film, give it a watch.… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
6
jannikpFeb 22, 2015
Gritty, dirty, Fury tries to capture the horrors of war. It does so remarkably, until it fails in the final 30min lasting showdown, in which 5 guys destroy an entire battalion of 300 German elite soldiers, one that is heavily armed and fittedGritty, dirty, Fury tries to capture the horrors of war. It does so remarkably, until it fails in the final 30min lasting showdown, in which 5 guys destroy an entire battalion of 300 German elite soldiers, one that is heavily armed and fitted with tank busting Panzerfausts, one that manages to flank the detracked armor, yet gets annihilated like chickens in a mechanized slaughterhouse. Like Spielberg's last battle scene in the village of SPR, in the manner of old "Call of Duty", the hordes of nihilistic death wishing lemmings of German elites simply run straight into the Sherman's lines of tracers - in the hundreds. For 30 minutes. If you want a good war movie, three fourths of this movie is watchable and great fun. The last part just lets you shake your head in disbelief, and you don't need to be a history enthusiast to realize that the revengism always pulls through in the end, a classic theme ending most American warmovies these days. Somehow the directors fail to realize that this breaks the entire impression, kills the immersion of the movie, and does grand injustice to the actors' otherwise great job. One really must feel sorry for them.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
68CamaroFeb 22, 2015
Seeing the only running Tiger running is cool. Seeing some of the other vehicles and equipment for historic interest sake, was great. That said, this was some of the worst writing for a war film that I've seen in years. Still I give it aSeeing the only running Tiger running is cool. Seeing some of the other vehicles and equipment for historic interest sake, was great. That said, this was some of the worst writing for a war film that I've seen in years. Still I give it a "5" just for the eye candy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
v0rpqu4Feb 21, 2015
Complete crap. German experienced anti-tank gun crews on defensive positions missing 4 shots in a row when firing at 4 static (from their point of view) Shermans? Ofcourse the Shermans hit targets from 800m away while on the move. Easy.
ThisComplete crap. German experienced anti-tank gun crews on defensive positions missing 4 shots in a row when firing at 4 static (from their point of view) Shermans? Ofcourse the Shermans hit targets from 800m away while on the move. Easy.
This isn't realistic, this is another 'Murica stronk' movie.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
2
teaguewdFeb 19, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. ‘Fury' is a film that manages to be something terrible despite having everything they could ever need at their disposal. All the ingredients are available for a gourmet meal, but somehow it still manages to serve up a platter where the main course contains velveeta “cheese”. Its not surprising, that this isn’t in the top-tier of war movies, but such a pitiful horror-show of cliched mise-en-scene flanked throughout with the exact same visual effects as the first few Star Wars Films(accompanied of course by the same laseresque sound effects) was not what I’d expected.
I rarely resort to the term ‘offended’, but I think thats exactly the feeling I found swelling up inside of me watching this film. As these catastrophic events unfolded before me, I was just on the verge of physical illness. Now the catastrophe I refer to most directly correspond to the performances of an otherwise noteworthy cast. In fact, as the main characters died off, I found myself feeling relieved. It wasn’t so much that I hated the characters, although none of them are the least bit likable(or more importantly plausible), but that there would be no more of their intensely cliched catchphrases, some of which were probably repeated at record breaking numbers for just 134 mins.
Its amazing to look back on the plot, and try to think about the narrative; what, if anything, happened? I’m not sure what could be said about this to make it more interesting. If you are looking for action scenes: there surprisingly few, and they are about as intense as a Telenovela, a bit like playing Battleship when you’ve already had ten drinks. Historical accuracy? If you’ve read more than three paragraphs describing WW2, you know there’s something off with this. Its simple-minded portrayal of the German army and its soldiers is overwhelmingly dismissive, to a point so superficially conceived that its jarring, not just for a war film, but any Hollywood movie. Needless to say it was not so compelling.
What was truly compelling, was the shoddiness of the film’s performances. Brad Pitt was Lt. Aldo Rain, taken down a few notches from exciting to uninvested. Michael Pena took painfully cliche to chalkboard-scraping levels. The guy from the Walking Dead was the worst, his stereotype of sex-crazed, moronic, inbred Southerners wasn’t even believable enough to be cliche(or consistent to be funny). Shia LaBeouf decided to go crazy over the wrong movie(Or maybe he just awakened psychological problems from the fist-fight-free-for-all the director forced the main ensemble to partake in). Lerman, the youngest actor, in fact did admit to being emotionally scarred due to this practice during production, and his performance was probably better than the rest of them.
Its hard to tell what they were going for with this ensemble, but not one of them was on the same page as any of the others. Alone they put up career-destroying performances, but together created a genre annihilating ensemble. I can’t tell how it worked out this badly. Every scene, every bit of dialogue was truly cringeworthy, the script seemingly generated by a computer whose inspiration was retrieved in bulk from the $5 DVD section at Walmart. Visually speaking, the film isn’t terribly shot whenever we get past the constant close-ups(the visual style complemented by somewhat interesting, highly-saturated version of the Band of Brothers look). Nonetheless its impossible to enjoy, cut up by editing akin to chopping the constituent elements of garden salad with a machete, and throwing them together in an ill-matching concoction of dressings. Amidst the constant gunfire sound-effects, everything stops for a failed dramatic moment about five times throughout, often when the characters face point-blank gunfire. In the final battle scene, consecutive shots bring everything from full daylight to darkest night. At his point, I decided to go to the restroom for a moment of respite, and started to wonder what else I could have done with my $2.50 besides visit this **** dollar theater.
In the restroom at some point during the film’s exhibition I saw a very old man wearing one of those hats Veterans sometimes wear from reunions. Like many, my grandfathers were in WWII, and I wondered what they would have thought of this movie if they were alive to see it. After all, its been a long time since the war, the youngest veterans of which would be around 88 years old this year, and here was one, barely able to stand up, but he had made the trip here to see this. That’s when I started to feel really bad. I had laughed when I saw the family of five walk in, all of them in head-to-toe camo, but now my heart sank. Maybe the people who were actually there deserve better than ‘Fury'. Of all the Hollywood genres, the War Film seemed to be historically the most consistently interesting and compelling. Just like that, I don’t know if that is longer any accurate. Maybe we all deserve better.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
8
KevowOfRiceFeb 18, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Fury is the most realistic WWII movie I've ever seen, up until the last bit where their tank turned into an invincible fortress and the Nazi's somehow lost half of their IQ and blitzcriged the FRONT of the tank.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
tonylionedoFeb 16, 2015
best world war 2 movie I've ever seen,it leaves me so sad after makes me fully realize the cruelty of war and I know that we should never initiate war and violence,I cant say nothing other than RIP to the person who lost their life in worldbest world war 2 movie I've ever seen,it leaves me so sad after makes me fully realize the cruelty of war and I know that we should never initiate war and violence,I cant say nothing other than RIP to the person who lost their life in world war 2,great movie.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
rybacksnFeb 15, 2015
One of the most unrealistic concluding war scenes I have seen. Makes Rambo look realistic. A single Sherman would have been destroyed in a few minutes in that scenario. The Germans did not take over all of Europe and parts of Africa andOne of the most unrealistic concluding war scenes I have seen. Makes Rambo look realistic. A single Sherman would have been destroyed in a few minutes in that scenario. The Germans did not take over all of Europe and parts of Africa and invade Russia being that stupid.… Expand
11 of 13 users found this helpful112
All this user's reviews
9
ApolscFeb 14, 2015
The problem that critics have with this movie is that refuses to show the american army as a bunch of noble heroes but people corrupted by war as any of other nation. If that is what you want to see you might preffer Eastwood's AmericanThe problem that critics have with this movie is that refuses to show the american army as a bunch of noble heroes but people corrupted by war as any of other nation. If that is what you want to see you might preffer Eastwood's American Sniper which is straight propaganda. Beautiful photography, the mechanical function of the tanks is hypnotizing, there are various great scenes, not only the ones of combat, and a lot of transgression and philosophy. The down part is the soundtrack that sounds as a cheap Clint Mansell composition.

El problema que tienen los críticos con esta pelicula es que se rehusa a mostrar a los estadounidenses como heroes de guerra, sino que los muestra como seres corruptos por esta como los de cualquier otra nacionalidad, si eso es lo que te gusta ver preferirás American Sniper que es pura propaganda fanática. La fotografía es hermosa, el enfoque en el funcionamiento de los tanques hipnotiza, hay escenas geniales y no solo son las del combate, hay mucha transgresión y filosofía. Lo malo diría que es la banda sonora, suena como una versión barata de Clint Mansell.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
mrmonsterFeb 14, 2015
this is not just my favor war movie this is one of my favorite movies of all times.this movie was very intense and moved at a great pace.Logan Lerman and Shia LaBeouf will never be concerned B list actors again
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
BobLeeSwaggerFeb 12, 2015
Movie was Ok. I felt the combination of the script, the acting and the costumes made the characters pretty unbelievable and caricature-ish. They all kind of reminded me of the crew in the cartoon Atlantis...
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
Dragon_FlyFeb 10, 2015
This movie goes out of it's way to showcase the neanderthal mentality of war where soldiers go into Germany to: shoot unarmed men in the back, have sex with prostitutes, and rape young women. It's a real slap in the face considering how theThis movie goes out of it's way to showcase the neanderthal mentality of war where soldiers go into Germany to: shoot unarmed men in the back, have sex with prostitutes, and rape young women. It's a real slap in the face considering how the Russians stormed Berlin and actively raped every woman and child they could find... a little part of history muted by education.

It's as if the producers want to dismiss these actions as "okay."… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
Swanny54Feb 9, 2015
I just finished watching the movie "Fury" This is as bad as "Red Tails" Its quite obvious that the writer hasn't read up on World War II books. The first phony part was the German Anti-tank guns in the forest. If he read anything at all,I just finished watching the movie "Fury" This is as bad as "Red Tails" Its quite obvious that the writer hasn't read up on World War II books. The first phony part was the German Anti-tank guns in the forest. If he read anything at all, they are called the deadly 88's! Why? because they don't miss. And they missed all their shots in the beginning of the movie. The only real scene was the one tiger against the 4 Shermans. Micheal Wittman destroyed an entire 7th armoured division in the hedges. That tank is real life would have stayed and picked them off at 800 metres, and in about 12 seconds. But the ending. A broken down tank and demolishing all them Germans! C'mon....they weren't that stupid. Can anybody make a real movie? I wasted 20 bucks on the DVD. Private Ryan was just as bad.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
8
ToFewViewsFeb 8, 2015
Fury follows Brad Pitt and his crew through war-torn Europe/Germany. Fury does a good job at immersing you in it's environment, with amazing sound effects and great back and forth banter between the crew. Fury's strong points are obviouslyFury follows Brad Pitt and his crew through war-torn Europe/Germany. Fury does a good job at immersing you in it's environment, with amazing sound effects and great back and forth banter between the crew. Fury's strong points are obviously It's Cast and Visual Effects but it surprised me with it's slower parts with a bit of real story and situations that make you sympathetic for the crew. It even has few small details in it's environment I've only read about in books. I felt like there were a few weeks points early on in the film but once the film got up-to pace it's very enjoyable.
Fury is a great weekend flick to watch with the Fam/Buds and even more enjoyable if you have a nice set up to experience the audio and visual effects to it's fullest.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Bruce722Feb 8, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Fury is a good film that depicts an American tank crew towards the closing of World War II. This movie had a lot of hype coming out and I think it largely was able to live up to most of it. Brad Pitt, Logan Lerman, Shai LaBeouf, Jon Bernthal, and Michael Pena form a fantastic cast of unique and substantially developed characters. The acting of Pitt and Bernthal especially carry the film. The plot, though lacking much premise beyond the war itself, is also developed really well throughout. There is one particular scene towards the midpoint of the film when they're about to leave a city after capturing it that really stood out and is, in my opinion, one of the best scenes in war movie history. Unfortunately, the movie couldn't carry that emotion throughout the rest of the film. The closing battle sequence was a little too "Hollywood" and didn't vibe with the realism and grit of the rest of the movie. Because of that, many of the character deaths felt unauthentic and didn't deliver the emotion that they should've. Overall, it's still a solid movie but it had potential to be much better.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
ViperspiderFeb 6, 2015
This movie was pretty great. The only reason it's not 10/10 for me is just because it's not one of my favourite movies of all time, but I cant fault it.

Shia LaBeouf was fantastic in this movie, his acting was easily one of the moreThis movie was pretty great. The only reason it's not 10/10 for me is just because it's not one of my favourite movies of all time, but I cant fault it.

Shia LaBeouf was fantastic in this movie, his acting was easily one of the more convincing performances I've seen in a long time. The effects in the movie are pretty great, except they put some very odd colouring around the bullet tracers which made them seem like lasers from Star Wars. The fight scenes were action packed and very cool, I really enjoyed them.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
imthenoobFeb 2, 2015
Well acted and entertaining enough but the quality of the script is certainly lacking. You don't learn much about the characters, Don't grow attached to them in the slightest. Thus making it tough to care about them and that's sort of keyWell acted and entertaining enough but the quality of the script is certainly lacking. You don't learn much about the characters, Don't grow attached to them in the slightest. Thus making it tough to care about them and that's sort of key when you are trying to do a war based drama film. It's still worthy of a rental but not as amazing as everyone says it is.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
PoprostuFilipFeb 1, 2015
The scene where one immobile tank fights whole squadron of soldiers armed with panzerfausts for few hours is just ridiculously stupid... well not only this one..
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
joarwhoJan 30, 2015
1. No story arc. The main characters just go from one pointless mission to another.

2. Great actors, bad script. 3. Five american soldiers sitting in a damaged tank kills 200 SS-soldiers armed with anti-tank rocket launchers. Yeah,1. No story arc. The main characters just go from one pointless mission to another.

2. Great actors, bad script.

3. Five american soldiers sitting in a damaged tank kills 200 SS-soldiers armed with anti-tank rocket launchers. Yeah, okay.

4. Go watch Band of Brothers instead. Much better and more realistic and historical correct.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
1
BennytwotimesJan 27, 2015
Bad directing, bad writing, and bad production design. Rife with historical and tactical inaccuracies. This movie is a waste of time. A clumsy effort all around.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
ROK1992Jan 27, 2015
A No-BullSh** type movie period.

It does not attempt to ease the viewers at any moment. The movie masterfully depicts the grotesque and depressing atmosphere of war and those who are caught up in it while also including many deepA No-BullSh** type movie period.

It does not attempt to ease the viewers at any moment.
The movie masterfully depicts the grotesque and depressing atmosphere of war and those who are caught up in it while also including many deep intellectual dialogues that we do not really expect out of a WW2 movie.
In my opinion, the whole movie was as shocking and powerful like the Normandy landing scene of "Saving Private Ryan".… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
0
oilregJan 25, 2015
70 years later still seems to be good time to release another WW2 movie, like it used to be every year since then. Unfortunatly it glorifies the unjustified brutality and inhumanity of the allied troops against the enemy after they waved70 years later still seems to be good time to release another WW2 movie, like it used to be every year since then. Unfortunatly it glorifies the unjustified brutality and inhumanity of the allied troops against the enemy after they waved the white flag already and put their weapons down already. As of today it becomes obvious that they gave a flying frak about the geneva conventions and the rules of humanity. On top of that trash movie its filled with historic lies from start to end.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
8
DokaluJan 23, 2015
David Aye's new movie is a great look of World War II, and not only that war, but all kind of war. It's great how it's presented, it's very realistic and you can really feel how horrible and violent it can sometimes get. The actorsDavid Aye's new movie is a great look of World War II, and not only that war, but all kind of war. It's great how it's presented, it's very realistic and you can really feel how horrible and violent it can sometimes get. The actors performances are just astonishing, especially from the two main characters (Brad Pitt and Logan Lerman).
The most important thing in this movie is relationships, what kind of relationships can a crew build in a war; and also, what can war turn you into, how war will make you become someone you are not, you want it or not. The action sequences are great, very realistic, not fake at all, and the directing and script, awesome. Sometimes you are going really to feel like if you really are in WWII. The only flaw in this movie is that you are not going to feel really attached to the characters, but everything else is really great, so go check it out.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
BenHazeldenJan 23, 2015
Now, first things first, the final fight scene does get a little naff - the SS troops gets attacked by Hollywood and forget how to fight. However, I am an extreme tank buff, therefore this gets an eight because of the incredible tank momentsNow, first things first, the final fight scene does get a little naff - the SS troops gets attacked by Hollywood and forget how to fight. However, I am an extreme tank buff, therefore this gets an eight because of the incredible tank moments this film includes - and the terror that they spread. A cold hearted war film, 'Fury' is good, just forget about the SS rabble and the terrible love interest.
8/10 - Ben Hazelden… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
hadyheshamJan 23, 2015
Well, considering the whole movie then it was a great EPIC. It's been a while since we've watched a really good war movie.Brad's performance was off the charts and so the others, they all really did great. I loved the soundtrack though it wasWell, considering the whole movie then it was a great EPIC. It's been a while since we've watched a really good war movie.Brad's performance was off the charts and so the others, they all really did great. I loved the soundtrack though it was a little off. But hat's off Steven Price you did awesomely well.
i'd give it 9/10 because it needed to be a bit longer.… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
2
DontBeSaltyJan 22, 2015
This movie looks nice but the script can eat my balls, nice visuals and a talented screen director are squandered on extremely poor writing and editing for the benefit of the mentally handicapped. This movie was so pro-America it made me ****This movie looks nice but the script can eat my balls, nice visuals and a talented screen director are squandered on extremely poor writing and editing for the benefit of the mentally handicapped. This movie was so pro-America it made me **** laugh, from the moment they try and make rape seem ok to the protagonist's character arc occurring in the first act of the movie. I like over the top action movies but this movie takes itself seriously and delivers only cock tease action with no meaning. Shia LaBeouf does a great job and hes got the best character but he's surround by retards and the movie isnt about him, he takes a back seat to Pitt and the dumb kid who awkwardly and pointlessly become Dad and Son completely changing Pitts character, who we already know because the director cast Brad Pitt as the exact same character from Inglorious Basterds.

The real issue with this film is there is no story, there's no motivation for the characters, there's no **** antagonist, there's nothing at stake so when they go off to do whatever for no reason you can't care. Nothing at all builds up to the final scene where you're treated to the same scene of Germans helplessly dying (as they have the whole movie) repeated over and over and over until the movie finishes is proverbial sloppy handjob with no finish, rolls over, farts and falls asleep as the credits roll.

I'd recommend the scenes when Shia LaBeouf shoots the tank cannon but nothing else, this is a movie for the extremely simple of mind who applaud Uncle Sam's freedom loving American soldiers bringing Gods divine will to the evil Nazis in their fantastical naive concept of World War II.

This movie is a good summary of the diarrhea stream of recent movies that people like because holy **** thinking is hard.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
MelanieFerraroJan 20, 2015
I loved this film, the times handled were inadequate, i liked the incarnation of Brad Pitt as the main character, but don't give you a 10 of the final score because I thought it was very open, i would have liked something a bit clear, butI loved this film, the times handled were inadequate, i liked the incarnation of Brad Pitt as the main character, but don't give you a 10 of the final score because I thought it was very open, i would have liked something a bit clear, but without that deprives the viewer, to conclude the end of the film… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

64 Critic Reviews

7.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL