First Man

7

AryanYOct 20, 2018

This movie isn't for everyone. It's slow, boring and sluggish at certain parts of the film, but it's still an amazing movie with beautiful cinematography and it's bolstered by Claire Foy's performance.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

m15964Feb 28, 2019

It seems that this movie take few attention and ignored just because of the flag at the final sequence up in the moon. I think "First Man" needs to be more discussed because it needs to talk about Armstrong's real life and his character andIt seems that this movie take few attention and ignored just because of the flag at the final sequence up in the moon. I think "First Man" needs to be more discussed because it needs to talk about Armstrong's real life and his character and then discuss about the character's behavior and dialog and go deeper to his mind and thoughts.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TheRaggedFlygonAug 25, 2019

First Man is a good movie, especially for those that enjoy learning about space travel and its history. I think that Chazelle's direction and Gosling's acting are both solid throughout this film. The tone accurately reflects the dangerFirst Man is a good movie, especially for those that enjoy learning about space travel and its history. I think that Chazelle's direction and Gosling's acting are both solid throughout this film. The tone accurately reflects the danger associated with the early Apollo missions. As we continue to follow Armstrong's journey leading up to the Apollo 11 mission we are given a glimpse into how it affects his familial relationships and how following the various other tragedies within NASA, the situation tenses as time goes on. The writing is consistent throughout, although I personally would have preferred a bit of a lighter tone at times, and the acting is believable.

Where my problem with this film comes is that I feel that while it checks the boxes of what makes it a "good film" in terms of the quality of its production and acting, the film falls short on the story that it is trying to tell. The film builds up to a climax that the audience already knows what is going to happen (the title of the film essentially "spoils" the result of the film for those unfamiliar with American history). This resulted in me not really caring about what was going to happen since I already knew. I had not emotional investment with the characters. I think that First Man is a fine, watchable movie. Those interested will probably learn something about NASA's early days, but many will leave the theater wondering why they were supposed to care about what happens.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

zrhumphreyJan 15, 2019

Great direction and some enthralling space scenes are the best parts of this surprisingly distant and hollow film.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

AlthafaDhiaMar 5, 2019

First of all if u expect to get documentary-like about NASA get to the moon film well u wrong This film more explaining the life of neil amstrong , that's it nothing else.
if u expect a film/documentary film abaout how NASA get work to theFirst of all if u expect to get documentary-like about NASA get to the moon film well u wrong This film more explaining the life of neil amstrong , that's it nothing else.
if u expect a film/documentary film abaout how NASA get work to the moon Apollo 11 , Hidden Figures is the choice… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DawdlingPoetNov 24, 2021

This is quite an insightful watch. I certainly felt more informed about Neil Armstrongs life, in terms of his personal background, having seen the film and I thought that Ryan Gosling gave a pretty good performance in the main role. he wasThis is quite an insightful watch. I certainly felt more informed about Neil Armstrongs life, in terms of his personal background, having seen the film and I thought that Ryan Gosling gave a pretty good performance in the main role. he was quite a sort of distant person, in more ways than one but I could understand that, from his perspective. The visual effects aren't too bad either. Some of the dialogue was a little muffled and hard to follow fully, which was frustrating, although I guess its somewhat fair to distinguish between the smaller talk during down time and the loud, edge of your seat moments when things are clearly precarious. As an insightful biopic its good but it certainly didn't grab me or keep me engrossed in the way that other such films manage to, thats what I thought.

Overall, however, yes; I would recommend this film, if you'd like to know a bit more about the Armstrong family.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

tropicAcesOct 12, 2018

Neil Armstrong is an American hero, Ryan Gosling is a great actor and Damien Chazelle is one of the best directors working today. But none of these things lend themselves to the simple, personal approach taken to an event of this magnitude. INeil Armstrong is an American hero, Ryan Gosling is a great actor and Damien Chazelle is one of the best directors working today. But none of these things lend themselves to the simple, personal approach taken to an event of this magnitude. I really wanted to love this movie, but so much of it just didn’t work..… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

6

AxeTJan 13, 2019

Earnest visceral and intimate treatment of most important of historical events widely covered in all manner and lodged in the cultural consciousness for 50 years, this does add a stylistically contemporary cinematic updating that puts youEarnest visceral and intimate treatment of most important of historical events widely covered in all manner and lodged in the cultural consciousness for 50 years, this does add a stylistically contemporary cinematic updating that puts you there perhaps more than ever before. It's also needlessly prolonged in its annoyingly too tight handheld photography which should have been more measured for effect! Surprisingly it drags even more than epics typically do considering its new look into the real hero's personal life.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

SrPepeFeb 23, 2019

Es una buena película con buenas escenas, pero nada más, esperaba mucho más y me decepcionó bastante.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Bertaut1Oct 26, 2018

Aesthetically laudable, emotionally vapid

More an intimate character drama than a grandiose examination of man's place in the cosmos, First Man is more concerned with domesticity than the actual journey to the moon, attempting to demonstrateAesthetically laudable, emotionally vapid

More an intimate character drama than a grandiose examination of man's place in the cosmos, First Man is more concerned with domesticity than the actual journey to the moon, attempting to demonstrate that behind the great moments of history exist personal demons and private motivations. Nothing wrong with that of course - contextualising small character beats against a larger historical canvas can produce compelling cinema. Terrence Malick's The Thin Red Line (1998), for example, uses the Battle of Guadalcanal as the background against which to engage personalised existential Heideggerian philosophical conundrums, whilst Michael Mann's Ali (2001) is more interested in Ali's private struggles outside the ring than his public bouts within it. However, for this kind of storytelling to work, one thing is essential - emotional connection. The audience must, in some way, care about the people on screen, otherwise their introspective problems are more than likely to feel like they are just getting in the way of the larger story. And that's exactly what happens in First Man - there is a lifelessness at the film's core, an emotional vapidity that can't be filled by exceptional technical achievements and laudable craft.

Based on James R. Hansen's, First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong (2005), the film begins in 1961, and hits all the beats you'd expect in the lead up to the Apollo 11 mission in 1969, including the death of his daughter, Karen (Lucy Stafford) from a brain tumour; his marriage problems with his first wife, Janet (Claire Foy); the lunar landing alongside Buzz Aldrin (Corey Stoll); and his private sojourn to the Lunar East crater.

With this framework, the film remains tied almost exclusively to Armstrong's perspective, with the occasional shift to Janet. It sets itself the task of penetrating this most private of men, explaining why he was so driven, even to the detriment of his family. And herein lies perhaps the film's most egregious failing. It's as if director Damien Chazelle and screenwriter Josh Singer think the Apollo 11 mission isn't interesting enough by itself - there needs to be some kind of deeper "why" behind the whole enterprise.

In any case, the attempts to tease out the inner workings of Armstrong's mind don't really work, as he remains very much in his own world - no matter what Gosling, Chazelle, and Singer do to dress him up, Armstrong comes across as aloof and interiorised. Partly at fault here is Gosling's performance, with its fulcrum of emotionless stoic masculinity. Instead of giving the character hidden depth, the few discernible traits he possesses make him something of a cardboard cut-out, a 21st-century screenwriter's idea of what an American man who grew up in the 40s and 50s should be.

Another issue is that the filmmakers choose to locate Armstrong's primary motivation in the death of Karen, which is presented with a mawkish sentimentality, as Chazelle attempts to link Karen's death with Armstrong's determination - as she is dying, he holds her and looks wistfully into the sky, and on the moon's surface, he drops her bracelet into the Lunar East crater and cries a few tears. The problem lies in the overkill, detracting from whatever genuine emotion such details should evoke. Every time we see Gosling stare yearningly into the sky, the potency of the film is diluted just a little bit more.

Did he really drop the bracelet into the crater? We don't know. However, for me, the whole thing comes across as far too syrupy, an amateur psychological profiling of a man who was intensely private. I would have much preferred the Lunar East trip to remain a mystery - by showing us what they think might have happened, Hansen, Singer, and Chazelle cheapen the intensely personal nature of the moment, which Armstrong obviously chose to keep secret for a reason.

Make no mistake, however, the lunar landing itself is beyond spectacular, with Justin Hurwitz's incredible music and Linus Sandgren's superb cinematography coming into their own. The sequence was shot in 70mm IMAX, and it makes extraordinary use of the larger frame, with the first panorama of the lunar surface almost as awe-inspiring as anything in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) or The Tree of Life (2011). An especially well-directed part of the lunar descent is that rather than lay down a busy foley track, Chazelle pulls out the sound altogether, creating an eerie, otherworldly moment that literally gave me goosebumps.

However, despite the magisterial last 30 minutes, and some sporadically well-handled moments, First Man is underwhelming, and, for long portions, interminably dull. As good as that final sequence is, it's no compensation for the plodding and lifeless two hours that precede it.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

garmonboziaNov 27, 2018

This is again a movie which is clearly over-hyped. I agree that the performances are good (especially Claire Foy). Neil Armstrong wasn't too charismatic so I understand why Gosling chose to play him with this stoic attitude and empty stares.This is again a movie which is clearly over-hyped. I agree that the performances are good (especially Claire Foy). Neil Armstrong wasn't too charismatic so I understand why Gosling chose to play him with this stoic attitude and empty stares. He also showed very real emotions in a couple of more dramatic scenes. But in the end this character wasn't really that interesting. I agree that trials of getting to the moon are shown in a thrilling manner. I disagree that the landing on the Moon in this movie was particularly spectacular. It was OK, but kinda meh. The surface of the Moon is cratered, grey and dusty - that's it. The real fuss was about the emotional journey. In this movie the screenwriter and director decided to tell the story from the point of a family drama. This is the strongest aspect of the movie. Armstrong is portrayed as someone who didn't manage to cure his daughter, so he is determined to go to the moon despite all the odds. We saw him searching for the treatment for her. In his opinion he probably failed her. So it is a promise he made (to himself / to her?) that he will never fail again. I know that people make a lot of strange stuff "for their loved ones" and a lot of times those things are like an ego driven wishes, dressed up as a tribute to lost ones. I'm OK with it. But it was almost the only thing that kept this movie arc together. The movie tries to base it's emotional payoff on a very oscar-baity scene, that nobody can confirm ever happened in real life. So is it a lie?, probability?, assumption ??? Not a good way to end the journey. It's not a bad movie. It's a bit slow and blurs the lines between real events and pure fantasy. The ending was just to emotionally manipulative for me and clearly an oscar-bait.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

bataguilaFeb 28, 2019

Muy lenta, le dan peso a personaje de la esposa que no hace nada. Lo más interesante es los ultimos 10min, pero eso debió ser toda la peli. Aprendes un poco de historia.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

StraciatellasOct 24, 2018

I was really looking forward to this movie, mainly because of the newest co-op between Damien Chazelle and Ryan Gosling. On some levels, First Man met the expectations. It's informative, host to some great acting by Ryan Gosling and ClaireI was really looking forward to this movie, mainly because of the newest co-op between Damien Chazelle and Ryan Gosling. On some levels, First Man met the expectations. It's informative, host to some great acting by Ryan Gosling and Claire Foy, and overall pretty decent to watch. However, for me personally, the choice to make the movie more documentary like in cinematography didn't pay off as well as I would have hoped. At the beginning it was OK, but as the movie progressed it sometimes felt like the cinematography was part of a low budget "let's not have too many special effects" choice. The shocky images even made me nauxious from time to time watching it in the theater. For me the acting in the movie saved it from an even lower grade. All in all it definitely wasn't a waste of time, but for me it's not in the "must-watch-again" category.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

BerikDec 12, 2019

First man is a movie about Neil Armstrongs depressing journey to getting to the moon. He's played by Ryan Gosling, and describes his 8+ years preparation and inner turmoils. And what it barely features is the actual pressence on the moon.First man is a movie about Neil Armstrongs depressing journey to getting to the moon. He's played by Ryan Gosling, and describes his 8+ years preparation and inner turmoils. And what it barely features is the actual pressence on the moon.

The movie mostly flashes out the loss of Neil's daughter called Karen, and the friends and colleagues who died in preparation for the Moon mission. Apart from it being interesting, it doesn't come across as tense or exciting due to Ryan Gosling's questionable acting. During much of the movie Ryan looks like he doesn't know where he is. I liked how the movie didn't shy away from using technical terms, and shows the un-romantic side of science. I however wished that they would have shown the walk on the moon, the planting of the flag, the collecting of rocks. Instead we get a scene where Neil drops a bracelet, and next thing you know he's already back at Earth. Dissapointing.

The movie misses something incredibly important: A climax. The movie fades to black after an incredibly awkard scene, and we are left with more questions than when we stepped into the movie. It's an average watch, and i give it a 6/10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

NautendoDec 31, 2019

A movie about the first man to place a footprint on the moon. This movie about Neil Armstrong contains thrilling and sad moments, and I kind of missed the happiness in this movie. I think "First Man" fits more with an age rating of 12 insteadA movie about the first man to place a footprint on the moon. This movie about Neil Armstrong contains thrilling and sad moments, and I kind of missed the happiness in this movie. I think "First Man" fits more with an age rating of 12 instead of 6, because it contains some deaths and straight up shocking moments.
Overall, this movie is fine. I don't know if I should recommend it or not though.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

GazMoviesSep 20, 2020

Very realistic, raw and emotional. The film is very slow and quite boring it feels too long as well I think they could have got it under 2 Hours. It is a Biopic and a character study focused on Neil Armstrong the first man on the moonVery realistic, raw and emotional. The film is very slow and quite boring it feels too long as well I think they could have got it under 2 Hours. It is a Biopic and a character study focused on Neil Armstrong the first man on the moon (Spoilers I guess lol) Don't go into this expecting a space adventure it isn't that type of movie. The sound effects used in this film are great as well as the shaking camera effects I can see why some people got motion sickness watching this. They do a good job of making you feel really confined and claustrophobic. I do think they over used the close up shots we spend most of the movie 2 Inches from the actors faces. Was an Okay movie I won't be rushing to watch it again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

NickTheCritickAug 10, 2022

This is the best Chazelle's movie and of course his most watchable one. The screenplay doesn't feel too much overloaded here and Gosling offers a more convincing performance than usual (probabily his best one after Refn "Drive").

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

tonyGreenOct 31, 2021

Just doesn't quite do enough with the source material. I appreciate the accuracy, but for me just too much earth bound melodrama, the actual moonshot seemed rushed.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Mando44646Oct 24, 2018

How can a movie about such a significant man and event be so *boring*? The movie is not bad in any way, but it drags and drags and drags.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

FadeBlackOct 16, 2018

It was certainly not what I was expecting. Extremely low-key and understated. Felt a little bit like an Indy movie with some big budget side takes. On one hand I appreciate that they tried to give it a more distinctive style in a sea of spaceIt was certainly not what I was expecting. Extremely low-key and understated. Felt a little bit like an Indy movie with some big budget side takes. On one hand I appreciate that they tried to give it a more distinctive style in a sea of space movies, but a lot of it didn't work for me. The family stuff, there was some depth to that, but too much of it just came out bland and ineffective. There was definitely a great a mount of research and effort put into the NASA parts of the movie, but too much of it was procedural without any real tension. Now, the actual moon landing scenes were indeed quite beautiful, and as can be expected elevated the movie, but still it's hard to give it more than a 5, 5.5/10 at most.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

5

gracjanskiNov 11, 2019

I found it boring, because you know the end of the movie. In addition it was a team, that managed to accomplish this mission, not just one man.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Brent_MarchantOct 20, 2018

It's almost inconceivable that a story as monumental as the first moon landing could be made boring, but, unfortunately, director Damien Chazelle has found a way to do just that. While the filmmaker's biopic about astronaut Neil ArmstrongIt's almost inconceivable that a story as monumental as the first moon landing could be made boring, but, unfortunately, director Damien Chazelle has found a way to do just that. While the filmmaker's biopic about astronaut Neil Armstrong takes a different approach to its subject than that of other historic space program pictures (like "The Right Stuff" and "Apollo 13") -- one that's more quietly contemplative and less bombastically heroic -- there's still something to be said for making it engaging, and that's where the film falls flat. This overlong slog, filled with easily edited material, too many protracted shots of silent emoting and images that are often filmed far too up close, tries the viewer's patience from early on -- and never eases up in these regards. As the lonely, brooding protagonist, Ryan Gosling delivers a fine performance in portraying the character for who he is, but, when placed in the context of a story that fundamentally lacks something to draw viewers into it, that effort is, regrettably, lost. The dark, sullen overall tone of the project does not help, either, especially in a film that showcases one of mankind's greatest accomplishments. In many ways, this plays, albeit loosely, like a film adaptation of David Bowie's "Space Oddity," but, personally, I'd rather listen to the song that sit through this tedious exercise. Kudos to Chazelle for being willing to try something different, but it's too bad this didn't show up in the finished product.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

DefinitelyMaybOct 12, 2018

As a massive fan of Damien Chazelle's previous works ie Whiplash and La La Land, First Man is, unfortunately, his first dud and a massive disappointment. The issue with First Man is that it overall has a pretty tame direction, and a storyAs a massive fan of Damien Chazelle's previous works ie Whiplash and La La Land, First Man is, unfortunately, his first dud and a massive disappointment. The issue with First Man is that it overall has a pretty tame direction, and a story that really doesn't spring to life despite the remarkable achievement of its main hero. That hero, of course, is Neil Armstrong, played very well by Ryan Gosling, but is so devoid of life and lacks any substantial relationships that make First Man an overall tired pointless films that does very little with the material that is on offer. Whilst Chazelle does manage to make a lot of the action very tense and helps deliver strong performances by Gosling and Claire Foy, the amount of negatives outweigh the film as a whole. For example, the film begins with plentiful amounts of shaky cam and extreme close-ups that make the film very disorientating. Whilst this technique is great during the action scenes where we feel the vulnerability of the astronaut's craft, it makes little sense during the domestic scenes where the film just decides to focus on the faces of the characters most of the time. Another problem is that the plot of the film documents the time between 1961 to the first apollo mission, but little character and relationships are developed during the time, making it a snore for most of the time. The film could have easily explored the relationship between Janet or Buzz Aldrin with Neil Armstrong, but this is instead neglected and most of the side characters are nothing than mere plot devices or stereotypes (namely Buzz who acts like this hot shot throughout the film but never has one meaningful conversation with Neil at all!). Instead, most scenes or set pieces act like montages of everything Armstrong did leading up to Apollo 11. Another problem is that the film tries really hard to inject emotion through the death of his daughter. Whilst some people might think that is emotional or deep, I found it super forceful and given that Neil was a stoic character to begin with, the whole relationship thing with his dead daughter felt unearned and often quickly forgotten. Some of the CGI at the end was pretty bad and was unnecessary but the final space sequences was quite good. As Chazelle is obsessed with jazz and music, I found the music choices suprisingly dull and a bit of a hit and miss throughout the film. Most of the meaningful score only comes at the end when Apollo 11 happens. I suppose the film also has a pacing issue because Chazelle decides to focus on some aspects for a very long time ie the Gemini 8 test flights, whilst Apollo 11 actually feels very rushed. Perhaps the biggest problem is that Neil Armstrong is arguably not really an enduring character and there is nothing really meaningful to say about him. He is stoic and straight to the point, but one that never really grows or one that the audience learns anything more about him even by the end of the film.

First man is an overall bland experience which I did not expect after seeing Chazelle's previous works. Where the previous films had a main theme of characters with a craft driven to obsesssion and having to sacrifice their relationships, the problem with the 'Armstrong story' is that we all know what happens - he becomes a global hero and has a happy albeit reclusive life. There is nothing really more to say. If the film decided to focus more on the struggles to get to the Moon and more on Armstrong with the other astronauts (such as who wants to land first/whilst their colleagues kept dying) then I personally think that would've been a better film. First Man unfortunately won't be coming first in terms of this year better films...… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

5

qJan 25, 2019

"First Man" starts out well enough, but it gradually becomes cumbersome and somewhat boring. The epic length, the dialogue I had to keep rewinding and replaying at higher volumes through my stereo speakers so I could understand it, the"First Man" starts out well enough, but it gradually becomes cumbersome and somewhat boring. The epic length, the dialogue I had to keep rewinding and replaying at higher volumes through my stereo speakers so I could understand it, the overemphasis on melodrama involving the wife and kids, and the studied downplaying and internationalizing of what was a uniquely American triumph leaves the viewer with a feeling best summed up in one word: "meh." I am sure there is all manner of high-end filmmaking craft that effete artsy-fartsy critics might appreciate, but the movie fails in its most basic mission: to engage and entertain the viewer.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

dashtagOct 14, 2018

Honestly was disappointed. Maybe just not my type of movie, because I found 'First Man' to be very slow and repetitive, as well as dumb and cliche. It made happy and historic points of the story very sad, reflecting lots about family, andHonestly was disappointed. Maybe just not my type of movie, because I found 'First Man' to be very slow and repetitive, as well as dumb and cliche. It made happy and historic points of the story very sad, reflecting lots about family, and although it showed a different side of the story it definitely had issues. The movie was too long and had a very mellow tone. I can see why some people really enjoyed it but in the end, it had me disappointed.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

5

clarkaddisonOct 27, 2018

Ryan is stoic, too the part where I think he is trying to hard. The first man, roll credits, to walk on the moon would have acted differently. This was based on a book and real life but I can feel Hollywoods touch in this and it takes me outRyan is stoic, too the part where I think he is trying to hard. The first man, roll credits, to walk on the moon would have acted differently. This was based on a book and real life but I can feel Hollywoods touch in this and it takes me out of it. 10/10 if it was just the space montages and flights.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

JEsFsFOct 13, 2018

okay. this movie has staked out it's niche. It's personally intimate. It's effective at literally getting in people's face. Inside a crowded Gemini cockpit: claustrophobic and chaotic. As majestic as the backdrop is, this film is as groundedokay. this movie has staked out it's niche. It's personally intimate. It's effective at literally getting in people's face. Inside a crowded Gemini cockpit: claustrophobic and chaotic. As majestic as the backdrop is, this film is as grounded as it gets, but not in a good way. Character studies have their value, but Armstrong, while an important man, while an iconic man, a First Man, is just not interesting man.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

5

Brando217Mar 9, 2019

Neil Armstrong's story is one that needed to be told, and this film does a good job at telling it. However, as marketed as a space epic, the actual moon landing is the most underwhelming thing I've witnessed in a film like this. It's almostNeil Armstrong's story is one that needed to be told, and this film does a good job at telling it. However, as marketed as a space epic, the actual moon landing is the most underwhelming thing I've witnessed in a film like this. It's almost tragic how the last 10 minutes don't utilize the potential to show how inspiring and powerful the moon landing is and instead keep the same depressed tone that was prevalent through the ENTIRE FILM.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

jason_87Jul 22, 2019

There are flashes of a good movie, here. I really appreciated the effort taken to put the audience inside the sights and sounds of the missions. I also thought it was an interesting idea to focus more on Armstrong, as a person. However, I'mThere are flashes of a good movie, here. I really appreciated the effort taken to put the audience inside the sights and sounds of the missions. I also thought it was an interesting idea to focus more on Armstrong, as a person. However, I'm not sure that we really get any insight.

A biopic isn't a documentary, so we know there is creative license. I still feel like there is something missing, though. The movie's narrative seems to become very myopic. I felt like it there was clearly more to Armstrong but that the movie wanted to only show a narrow interpretation of him. And ultimately, the movie really stars to drag. I didn't want it to be boring but I have to admit that's probably the best word for it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

zklJun 20, 2020

actually boring enough to prompt me to switch out after the first 10 minutes

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

HabibiehakimFeb 18, 2023

First Man feels so unenergized, a super lame biopic film about one of the greatest event in human history, it just lacks so many lighter side of the story, and it more focus on the depressed side of it that it could definitely work but notFirst Man feels so unenergized, a super lame biopic film about one of the greatest event in human history, it just lacks so many lighter side of the story, and it more focus on the depressed side of it that it could definitely work but not for me, and i found it mostly boring and too long, Ryan Gosling definitely not my First Man to be considered for this role but he's doing alright just like the rest of the cast, the visual are great, the sound and score was great, and of course the moon landing sequence was visually stunning and the ending was good, and besides that it still have some decent part, but really for the most part it was downright flat and boring, and i feel like just wanna go straight to 1969, First Man wasn't like any of Damien Chazelle other film, Whiplash was my favourite movie of all time, La La Land was one of my favourite Musical, and First Man was the first one without any musical theme in Damien Chazelle's career and i can say that this movie is a surprise failure.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

liamexeJun 10, 2023

I'll start my review by stating that I enjoy intense, dramatic films that most people find dull. I was excited to see this movie since it sounded interesting, but it ended up being one of the most dull, repetitive, self-indulgent, andI'll start my review by stating that I enjoy intense, dramatic films that most people find dull. I was excited to see this movie since it sounded interesting, but it ended up being one of the most dull, repetitive, self-indulgent, and painfully slow films I have ever seen. To sit through the entire movie required extreme self-control. It offers no real understanding of Neil Armstrong's biography, the NASA space programme, or the moon landing. There are simply a lot of long, silent, dramatic looks. Save yourself some time and skip this movie. Nothing is lacking for you. A fantastic musical composition is crucial to me because I major in music. There is no "so-called" music score. What happened to the lavish celebrations and gripping films?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

namelessOct 26, 2018

Well shot, interesting subject... maybe its me but Gosling use to be so good now he is a wooden cutout of himself. I thought it was maybe the movie but saw him promoting and he is the same way. It is like he has lost interest in the craft andWell shot, interesting subject... maybe its me but Gosling use to be so good now he is a wooden cutout of himself. I thought it was maybe the movie but saw him promoting and he is the same way. It is like he has lost interest in the craft and wants to do something else, and it shows.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

s053714Jan 29, 2019

This movie is really slow. The special effects are cheap and even the musical score is often inappropriate and sometimes annoying. The editing is also mystifying, with sequences of high drama suddenly cut to children playing. They gaveThis movie is really slow. The special effects are cheap and even the musical score is often inappropriate and sometimes annoying. The editing is also mystifying, with sequences of high drama suddenly cut to children playing. They gave this movie to the wrong director. I'd love to see what Ron Howard or Clint Eastwood could have done with this story. This was a huge disappointment for me.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

wpoe54Oct 15, 2018

This movie wants to impress, but in the end, simply bores. The characters should be able to connect, but don't. Some of the problem is with the directing, but more has to do with the thin story line. The sound effects, which adequate, don'tThis movie wants to impress, but in the end, simply bores. The characters should be able to connect, but don't. Some of the problem is with the directing, but more has to do with the thin story line. The sound effects, which adequate, don't mask the poor special effects. I wanted to like this movie, but can't recommend it. Nothing in it you don't already know about the space program.… Expand

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

4

WindolickerMar 4, 2019

This movie thinks it is edgy and cutting edge and ultimately it just tries too hard to evoke emotions. There are constantly long scenes where nothing is said and the audience gets to just stare at Gosling and other characters. I reallyThis movie thinks it is edgy and cutting edge and ultimately it just tries too hard to evoke emotions. There are constantly long scenes where nothing is said and the audience gets to just stare at Gosling and other characters. I really thought this film was a bore and I am super passionate about space and astronomy. It really is just a meditation on Neil Armstrong himself and frankly I don't think they even succeed on that front. As far as it being a biopic it really doesn't show Armstrong's character anyway. Zzzzzzzzz… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

muldjordNov 23, 2018

Get ready for long strides of Ryan Gosling staring stone-faced around rooms and space capsules. I get it, Neil was never a talkative guy, so the portrayal, while snooze-inducing, is probably on point. Sadly, it makes for some really slow,Get ready for long strides of Ryan Gosling staring stone-faced around rooms and space capsules. I get it, Neil was never a talkative guy, so the portrayal, while snooze-inducing, is probably on point. Sadly, it makes for some really slow, devoid of dialog and almost lifeless passages. And those are the scenes on Earth! Neil's demeanor pretty much kills all of the drama as it happens. Completely devoid of emotion. Might be accurate, but it makes for some damn boring scenes.
The scenes in space are pretty much a mix of fast cutting between zoomed in buttons and displays, a lot of shaking and the occasional view from outside the capsules. The technical details of pretty much everything is cut down to the bare minimum. Most of the time you have no idea what is going on. And the worst part is that even the moon landing itself seems so devoid of excitement that I just didn't care about it. I just wanted the movie to end!
Normally, when I watch movies or documentaries on this stuff, I am almost in tears when they reach the points of great significance. Not the case for this one! I just sat there. No interest in the scene. Nothing but boredom.

Bottom line: This movie is 90 minutes of Neil Armstrong getting in and out of capsules mixed with some incredibly slow-moving family moments on Earth being interrupted by calls about colleague accidents. Then he goes to the Moon, quickly skips to being back on Earth and the movie ends.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

BioTofuNov 2, 2018

the shaky cam felt very unnecessary and it was giving me slight motion sickness. i thought the shakiness was a reflection of armstrongs inner self but the whole damn movie it just shoke nonstop even when characters are just sitting still on athe shaky cam felt very unnecessary and it was giving me slight motion sickness. i thought the shakiness was a reflection of armstrongs inner self but the whole damn movie it just shoke nonstop even when characters are just sitting still on a chair. then a lot of the scenes felt like the director just threw his camera and a broken flashlight into a tumble dryer and those scenes would go on for ever. most of the time the audience is just confused at what is going on on the screen. armstrongs character was also so distant and unlikable compared to some of his colleagues, which really made it hard for me to understand him. if you like the style of lincoln you might like this movie. but I thought lincoln was much more interesting to watch… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

WidewadatNov 2, 2018

Predictable and over-dramatized. Mediocre cinematography, shaking cameras and very obvious music leading to and underlining every single dramatic moment. Characters are dimensionless and don't change, neither learn anything. The movie doesn'tPredictable and over-dramatized. Mediocre cinematography, shaking cameras and very obvious music leading to and underlining every single dramatic moment. Characters are dimensionless and don't change, neither learn anything. The movie doesn't address any problematic topics, doesn't teach anything, doesn't explore any emotions and isn't much entertaining. The acting is fine, but the whole plot is just boring.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

jackronnerOct 28, 2018

Guess this is one movie that's spoiler-proof. The same could be said of Apollo 13 (I was an adult for both), but that movie somehow generated suspense and empathy, which are hard to come by in First Man. I suppose that the tale of 13 isGuess this is one movie that's spoiler-proof. The same could be said of Apollo 13 (I was an adult for both), but that movie somehow generated suspense and empathy, which are hard to come by in First Man. I suppose that the tale of 13 is more implicitly exciting, and that the principals were inherently more likable and even humorous at times; I have to say I hope that Neil was actually more interesting in real life. He is played almost entirely without affect, and would likely be diagnosed today as being somewhere on the "spectrum". The space sequences are not bad, but they don't pull you in to the experience. I'd say rent Apollo 13 instead.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

holydragonguyOct 22, 2018

good actors but this movie put me to sleep some...………………………………………………………………..

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

4

BigbroOct 21, 2018

Ok look I'm sorry that people really enjoyed this movie however I was not one of those people to me it was nothing but super slow and boring I should have stuck with my original plan and skipped all together so not worth

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

rafaeljfsOct 22, 2018

Ryan Gosling mais uma vez em sua zona de conforto, atuação ok. Filme que retrata a irrelevância de um programa espacial que custou milhões de doláres e algumas vidas. Definitivamente é o típico filme Hollywoodiano que mostra os EUA como osRyan Gosling mais uma vez em sua zona de conforto, atuação ok. Filme que retrata a irrelevância de um programa espacial que custou milhões de doláres e algumas vidas. Definitivamente é o típico filme Hollywoodiano que mostra os EUA como os paladinos da liberdade, salvadores do universo, custe o que custar. Não imaginava que o filme teria essa perspectiva tão patriota, muito embora tivesse ciência de que se tratava de algo intrinsecamente relacionado à Guerra Fria. Em grandes partes o filme é extremamente monótono, o que em muito se deve à falta de personalidade do ator principal em sua atuação. Provavelmente será um filme premiado, não pelo seu conteúdo, mas por representar aquilo que os americanos querem que o mundo veja deles.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

LegendaryLassDec 14, 2018

If you like quiet, dialogue-less reflections (and you can stay awake through them), Chazelle may have a film for you. Claire Foy delivers the sleeper performance of the film, but the bulk of the time we spend watching Gosling silently lookIf you like quiet, dialogue-less reflections (and you can stay awake through them), Chazelle may have a film for you. Claire Foy delivers the sleeper performance of the film, but the bulk of the time we spend watching Gosling silently look at things and not much else. Who said no one could make rocket ships blasting off to the moon uninteresting?… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

deecatOct 26, 2018

One small step for man, one giant stumble for the filmmakers.

The movie was less about space and more about a man coping with the death of his young daughter. It had the potential to be an emotional rollercoaster, but honetly it failed toOne small step for man, one giant stumble for the filmmakers.

The movie was less about space and more about a man coping with the death of his young daughter. It had the potential to be an emotional rollercoaster, but honetly it failed to lauch.The characters in this movie were dull and distant, at times it felt like a documentry about cold serial killers. The cinematography was another misstep. Regardless of the scene, the camera was shaking and focus pumping every 2 seconds, akin to watching the movie in a MASTIF gimbal rig.

I believe Clint Eastwood or Mel Gibson would have been a much better choice of director. Clint would have given the characters a soul and Mel would haven given the film a sense of awe and grandeur. Instead the film was a depressing dirge, a funeral march to the moon.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

zNeverSleepingOct 20, 2020

Ao menos a primeira vista, o longa me pareceu entediante. É muito incomum da minha parte largar filmes na metade, mas aqui foi bem difícil não tomar essa atitude. Talvez algum dai eu reveja e tenha uma percepção diferente.

Audio: English, noAo menos a primeira vista, o longa me pareceu entediante. É muito incomum da minha parte largar filmes na metade, mas aqui foi bem difícil não tomar essa atitude. Talvez algum dai eu reveja e tenha uma percepção diferente.

Audio: English, no subtitles - Q60T 50' TV Speakers [Dolby 7.1]
Quality: 4K HDR [Bluray]… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

3

SuperKevNov 20, 2018

First Man went to great lengths to highlight in lengthy detail every major failure of the space program up to Apollo 11 with no balance to it. This movie spent zero time on any of the successes until the end with the successful landing on theFirst Man went to great lengths to highlight in lengthy detail every major failure of the space program up to Apollo 11 with no balance to it. This movie spent zero time on any of the successes until the end with the successful landing on the moon. The movie itself is well made, well acted and the special effects were fine. This is this movie depicted an complete rotten life for Neil Armstrong that seemingly turns him into this nearly emotionless stoic. They should have mixed in a little bit more of the Right Stuff and show at least something of the many successes leading up to Apollo 11. The movie was highly riveting in a misleading way most of the time. The actual landing sequence was decent and I thought it was the best part in the movie. But seriously you get 2hrs of tragedy, 20 minutes of spaceflight and really nothing positive about the program. They literally spend more time discussing Russia's successes at the time than anything NASA did. It is a very adept attempt at revisionist history.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

3

VonSeuxDec 26, 2018

Very Boring, dark, and lacking emoton on almost every scene... the movie russian The Spacewalk is made arround similar events and is much much more engaging

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

Qgal5kapDec 27, 2018

Quite disappointed with this movie. Don't get me wrong, it doesn't totally suck, as there are many elements of it I enjoyed. BUT, in terms of story telling, it was dull and uninspiring. Hollywood has lost the ability to tell a story it seems.Quite disappointed with this movie. Don't get me wrong, it doesn't totally suck, as there are many elements of it I enjoyed. BUT, in terms of story telling, it was dull and uninspiring. Hollywood has lost the ability to tell a story it seems. This movie was 2.2hrs long, and I feel like I got 30 minutes of actual storytelling.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

AndremaxFeb 4, 2019

First Man is so painfully boring that doesn't even open space for immersion, even with camera's cuts that in theory should passing sensation of suffocating lived by characters.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

shoulderoforionDec 14, 2018

Nope, this movie was a complete miss. Having been spoiled by The Right Stuff way back in 1983 (!!!) having shown this story in what is turning out to be the best possible way with the best possible cast, First Man was too dark, too moody,Nope, this movie was a complete miss. Having been spoiled by The Right Stuff way back in 1983 (!!!) having shown this story in what is turning out to be the best possible way with the best possible cast, First Man was too dark, too moody, looks like it was filmed with a potato inside a potato, melancholy mess of a picture wasn't worth the 2+ hours spend watching it. This director was trying for something and he didn't hit this barn with the elephant (potato) gun. uggh, this was bad in every way.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

3

shermyOct 18, 2018

Just saw it and I felt I was sitting thru a couple of hours of schmaltz. If we aren't looking into Armstrong's eyes, we are looking at his wife's eyes. At least she had a part to play, and did it well, where as Gosling/Armstrong part was toJust saw it and I felt I was sitting thru a couple of hours of schmaltz. If we aren't looking into Armstrong's eyes, we are looking at his wife's eyes. At least she had a part to play, and did it well, where as Gosling/Armstrong part was to look and act like a statue of an astronaut. And it's hard to give much credit for astronaut risk and bravery at a time when 50,000 US military (including 14,000 draftees)were giving up there lives in Vietnam.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

3

TrevorsViewDec 27, 2018

Plenty of justifications have been addressed why Americans think they live in the world’s greatest country, perhaps one of the most common being because they landed on old Luna before Russia. But unlike that giant leap mankind took, DamienPlenty of justifications have been addressed why Americans think they live in the world’s greatest country, perhaps one of the most common being because they landed on old Luna before Russia. But unlike that giant leap mankind took, Damien Chazelle’s attempt to recreate it in First Man takes three massive steps down after his last two projects set him on a hot streak. History’s youngest Best Director Oscar winner managed to accomplish the impossible: turning an important figure into a passive plot device with Bella Swan level personality.

The technical elements instead steal the focus, diminishing Neil Armstrong with unnecessary focused shots on a fly and a control panel’s Chinese takeout food that add no story significance. This emotional distance may be for the best though, as the story built around Neil features plenty unrealistic additions, most groanworthy being what he does with his dead daughter’s bracelet. Even Interstellar might mock its ridiculousness! Riding off that other 2001: A Space Odyssey wannabee, important details are disregarded, including international contribution to NASA, allowing key milestones to merely happen to each character, particularly Neil’s wife, Janet, who’s worse written than any pre-Force Awakens Star Wars female. At least those ugly Star Wars prequels had actual image contrast, unlike the bad color grading of this movie, which gives an ugly texture put together by someone who let success override his head. However, taking the pre-production design process into account, a nice attention on using cool vs. warm colors juxtaposes Janet’s baby blue dress against the Apollo 11’s bright jet flames. Mary Zophres’ costumes (La La Land, True Grit) are surprisingly detailed as they take on an impression of wanting to be like moonbeams: a pure, straight path, but not quite able to get there... they look more often like the chaos of a nuclear explosion. Yes, every crisp design choice matches an era of new beginnings, unlike Neil’s turmoil of losing his daughter to brain cancer. Especially after the dark, scary opening scene when Neil first hits Earth’s thermosphere, enough justification guarantees chills with every view beyond the clouds.

Many say this feature must only be seen in IMAX, and honestly, it’s true. From the Gemini 5’s radio that rattles your ears to the documentary-esque camera cropped closer than usual, Neil’s nauseous claustrophobia becomes instantly comprehensible. Then after the sounds of the ship boom out of control, complete space silence takes Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 classic to heart. It forces prolonged depth into infinity’s empty black void beyond Earth’s blue aura; then this Kubrickian style turns simultaneously epic on the ground with a heavy landing on the Mojave Desert, an intro that would make Steven Spielberg proud. Also, when they reach the moon’s surface, despite the controversy, a US flag does show up! It’s just not seen being planted in! Thus, you can stop getting mad about it.

You can get mad instead at the way Ryan Gosling (Half Nelson, La La Land) plays Neil Armstrong without any believability. Ryan acts the same as he did in Blade Runner 2049, just staring with eyes half-open as if confused about how to play the role properly, worse than Amy Adams’ grossly mediocre Arrival performance. One might very well call Neil a replicant in this case as he barely even reacts to a training simulator. His nonexistent effort turns extra noticeable though on the earth’s soil, as him listening to “Lunar Rhapsody” with Janet feels unromantic. Both Ryan and Claire Foy probably felt very confused about how to portray their respective roles because of the perplexing scene arrangements which beg you to question, “why does any of this matter?” For instance, most of their impersonal conversations are filmed from behind as if this was a low-budget romantic period piece/failed Oscar bait.

It’s unbelievable how Josh Singer, who won an Oscar for the tremendous Spotlight, now turns out one of 2018’s worst screenplays, blocking all the genuine difficulties felt that tell us new, personal facts about Neil Armstrong and his family. Everybody becomes a plot device pushing events forward, technology often left to work instead to hand out exposition. One is an old informational video that replaces conflict to give out crucial information, which honestly just looks lazy. Besides, we already know they will succeed, so why would any of this matter?

Although the core problem with First Man is a lot deeper than just a lousy script, it’s worse even than historical accuracy—the most common issue with biopics (this one is relatively true to what really happened). The core problem is that this film uses a man’s life as an excuse to create cinematic spectacle. How would you like it if somebody took a milestone of your life, removed all fears leading up to that milestone, and replaced it with empty, pretty pictures?… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

hellpittOct 23, 2018

I usually love movies by this actor...but this was just off...doesn't help that is not historical and borderlines science fiction.

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

2

RainmaKer779Oct 17, 2018

Slow, uninspiring, and confused. Pivotal parts of the process not present. Neil Armstrong is portrayed as a diligent hard-working man and whose emotional intelligence is apparently so terrible that the director decided to not have RyanSlow, uninspiring, and confused. Pivotal parts of the process not present. Neil Armstrong is portrayed as a diligent hard-working man and whose emotional intelligence is apparently so terrible that the director decided to not have Ryan Gosling do anything note-worthy other than appearing stone-faced for the entire film. Two points for the amazing score.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

2

koconnorJan 29, 2019

You have to question the legitimacy of ratings. You have to be suspicious of any good rating. This was a horrible movie. Enough with the shaking hand held camera. Enough of the melodrama. I could hardly stay awake through this movie. MyYou have to question the legitimacy of ratings. You have to be suspicious of any good rating. This was a horrible movie. Enough with the shaking hand held camera. Enough of the melodrama. I could hardly stay awake through this movie. My biggest regret is I'll never get those 2 hours back. How do you make one of the most exciting events in our history so painfully boring?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

BroyaxApr 19, 2021

Quelle déception… moi qui croyais voir un film sur l’exploit technique et humain, j’ai surtout vu un psychodrame pleurnichard bien mal réalisé ! La caméra atteinte de Parkinson, c’est vraiment pénible : oui, on a bien compris que ça secoueQuelle déception… moi qui croyais voir un film sur l’exploit technique et humain, j’ai surtout vu un psychodrame pleurnichard bien mal réalisé ! La caméra atteinte de Parkinson, c’est vraiment pénible : oui, on a bien compris que ça secoue là-dedans… pas la peine d’en faire des tonnes… et toutes ces séquences mal cadrées qui ne montrent rien, à part les yeux de Gosling, un bout de lucarne et… des secousses.

Heureusement, de temps en temps, les effets spéciaux servent tout de même à quelque chose et l’alunissage par exemple (ou le vol du tout début) est relativement bien fait même si le sujet et les évènements qui ont fait l’Histoire sont fortement dilués… car les trois quarts du film ne sont en vérité que la vie privée de Monsieur Armstrong, sa gamine malade, sa femme qui tire la gueule (une mégère) et son gamin attardé hyper-actif qui fait chier.

En avant donc la fusée et quelques échecs qui auraient mérité davantage d’attention… de même que les réussites. Mais non les violons reviennent sans cesse et bouffent le film décidément bien mal en point… avec, cela va de soi, la guimauve à seulement deux dollars avec de temps à autre des types dans une carlingue qui actionnent des commutateurs.

Du coup, les principales étapes de cette épopée spatiale (dont l’étape finale) sont étonnamment escamotées… tout ça pour ça, bah dis donc, quelle merde !… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

thankyou1001Oct 12, 2018

It's a boring film. It seems to be made just because they want those awards.

7 of 33 users found this helpful726

All this user's reviews

1

PamoFeb 15, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Very boring plot and irrelevant scenes. Don’t know why it got chosen for an Oscar. In one of the first scenes Neil Armstrong is in a shaking aircraft for no reason at all. And once he lands one the moon he takes like 5 minutes just staring at the ground for no reason at all. Honestly it is a very slow movie. I could hardly stay awake through this movie. My biggest regret is I'll never get those 2 hours back. How do you make one of the most exciting events in our history so painfully boring?… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

ApollusNov 11, 2018

First Man was super boring and honestly a huge dishonor to history.
The writers and actors def thought they were making a deep movie. It was like purposely boring.

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

0

kiwijinxterOct 19, 2018

Watch Transformers: Dark of the Moon instead - it has more of the first men than "The First Man". It features the American flag, emotional robots, action, fantastic CGI, space travel, Kennedy, Obama, Neil Armstrong and even the REAL LIFE BuzzWatch Transformers: Dark of the Moon instead - it has more of the first men than "The First Man". It features the American flag, emotional robots, action, fantastic CGI, space travel, Kennedy, Obama, Neil Armstrong and even the REAL LIFE Buzz Aldrin actually makes a cameo appearance.… Expand

2 of 32 users found this helpful230

All this user's reviews

0

SIPPIOJan 24, 2019

This movie is TERRIBLE...
old person~ "it happened, I heard it on the radio "
jokes aside~ Neil & Buzz aren't good people.. ESP BUZZ... Something bothered me when he wouldn't swear on the bible that he went to the moon & attacked theThis movie is TERRIBLE...
old person~ "it happened, I heard it on the radio "
jokes aside~ Neil & Buzz aren't good people..
ESP BUZZ... Something bothered me when he wouldn't swear on the bible that he went to the moon
& attacked the person..
**I don't watch those conspiracy videos but the popular ones find a way to creep in..
As far as the movie for movies sake= MEH,boring, and I couldn't finish it...… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

0

Lcs_alcantaraOct 22, 2018

eu nao gostei , esperava mais deste filme e do proprio ator no qual sou fã..nao foi dessa vezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

0

xsu-ecJan 17, 2019

Worst movie I've ever seen... At least last 5 years... ZERO effects, ZERO operator work. Each of us can make half time of that movie same quality screen motion with iPhone & Table & dark Pocket & piece of cloth & some well formed chalk orWorst movie I've ever seen... At least last 5 years... ZERO effects, ZERO operator work. Each of us can make half time of that movie same quality screen motion with iPhone & Table & dark Pocket & piece of cloth & some well formed chalk or salt or piece of soap
remember this tweet...
To compare, and feel the difference try to watch i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Pioneers or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salyut_7_(film) (both of them deserve to be seen)… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

0

WayTooBadMar 18, 2022

This movie ruined Ryan Gosling in my eyes, I used to enjoy the roles he played, the silent strong and dangerous guy thinking he has a dimension which is not visible but there. Now he is just boring to death in my eyes.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

First Man

User Reviews