First Man
Universal Pictures | Release Date: October 12, 2018
7.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 631 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
490
Mixed:
93
Negative:
48
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
4
wpoe54Oct 15, 2018
This movie wants to impress, but in the end, simply bores. The characters should be able to connect, but don't. Some of the problem is with the directing, but more has to do with the thin story line. The sound effects, which adequate, don'tThis movie wants to impress, but in the end, simply bores. The characters should be able to connect, but don't. Some of the problem is with the directing, but more has to do with the thin story line. The sound effects, which adequate, don't mask the poor special effects. I wanted to like this movie, but can't recommend it. Nothing in it you don't already know about the space program.… Expand
9 of 13 users found this helpful94
All this user's reviews
5
Mando44646Oct 24, 2018
How can a movie about such a significant man and event be so *boring*? The movie is not bad in any way, but it drags and drags and drags.
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
5
Brent_MarchantOct 20, 2018
It's almost inconceivable that a story as monumental as the first moon landing could be made boring, but, unfortunately, director Damien Chazelle has found a way to do just that. While the filmmaker's biopic about astronaut Neil ArmstrongIt's almost inconceivable that a story as monumental as the first moon landing could be made boring, but, unfortunately, director Damien Chazelle has found a way to do just that. While the filmmaker's biopic about astronaut Neil Armstrong takes a different approach to its subject than that of other historic space program pictures (like "The Right Stuff" and "Apollo 13") -- one that's more quietly contemplative and less bombastically heroic -- there's still something to be said for making it engaging, and that's where the film falls flat. This overlong slog, filled with easily edited material, too many protracted shots of silent emoting and images that are often filmed far too up close, tries the viewer's patience from early on -- and never eases up in these regards. As the lonely, brooding protagonist, Ryan Gosling delivers a fine performance in portraying the character for who he is, but, when placed in the context of a story that fundamentally lacks something to draw viewers into it, that effort is, regrettably, lost. The dark, sullen overall tone of the project does not help, either, especially in a film that showcases one of mankind's greatest accomplishments. In many ways, this plays, albeit loosely, like a film adaptation of David Bowie's "Space Oddity," but, personally, I'd rather listen to the song that sit through this tedious exercise. Kudos to Chazelle for being willing to try something different, but it's too bad this didn't show up in the finished product.… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
4
holydragonguyOct 22, 2018
good actors but this movie put me to sleep some...………………………………………………………………..
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
4
muldjordNov 23, 2018
Get ready for long strides of Ryan Gosling staring stone-faced around rooms and space capsules. I get it, Neil was never a talkative guy, so the portrayal, while snooze-inducing, is probably on point. Sadly, it makes for some really slow,Get ready for long strides of Ryan Gosling staring stone-faced around rooms and space capsules. I get it, Neil was never a talkative guy, so the portrayal, while snooze-inducing, is probably on point. Sadly, it makes for some really slow, devoid of dialog and almost lifeless passages. And those are the scenes on Earth! Neil's demeanor pretty much kills all of the drama as it happens. Completely devoid of emotion. Might be accurate, but it makes for some damn boring scenes.
The scenes in space are pretty much a mix of fast cutting between zoomed in buttons and displays, a lot of shaking and the occasional view from outside the capsules. The technical details of pretty much everything is cut down to the bare minimum. Most of the time you have no idea what is going on. And the worst part is that even the moon landing itself seems so devoid of excitement that I just didn't care about it. I just wanted the movie to end!
Normally, when I watch movies or documentaries on this stuff, I am almost in tears when they reach the points of great significance. Not the case for this one! I just sat there. No interest in the scene. Nothing but boredom.

Bottom line: This movie is 90 minutes of Neil Armstrong getting in and out of capsules mixed with some incredibly slow-moving family moments on Earth being interrupted by calls about colleague accidents. Then he goes to the Moon, quickly skips to being back on Earth and the movie ends.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
4
jackronnerOct 28, 2018
Guess this is one movie that's spoiler-proof. The same could be said of Apollo 13 (I was an adult for both), but that movie somehow generated suspense and empathy, which are hard to come by in First Man. I suppose that the tale of 13 isGuess this is one movie that's spoiler-proof. The same could be said of Apollo 13 (I was an adult for both), but that movie somehow generated suspense and empathy, which are hard to come by in First Man. I suppose that the tale of 13 is more implicitly exciting, and that the principals were inherently more likable and even humorous at times; I have to say I hope that Neil was actually more interesting in real life. He is played almost entirely without affect, and would likely be diagnosed today as being somewhere on the "spectrum". The space sequences are not bad, but they don't pull you in to the experience. I'd say rent Apollo 13 instead.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
SuperKevNov 20, 2018
First Man went to great lengths to highlight in lengthy detail every major failure of the space program up to Apollo 11 with no balance to it. This movie spent zero time on any of the successes until the end with the successful landing on theFirst Man went to great lengths to highlight in lengthy detail every major failure of the space program up to Apollo 11 with no balance to it. This movie spent zero time on any of the successes until the end with the successful landing on the moon. The movie itself is well made, well acted and the special effects were fine. This is this movie depicted an complete rotten life for Neil Armstrong that seemingly turns him into this nearly emotionless stoic. They should have mixed in a little bit more of the Right Stuff and show at least something of the many successes leading up to Apollo 11. The movie was highly riveting in a misleading way most of the time. The actual landing sequence was decent and I thought it was the best part in the movie. But seriously you get 2hrs of tragedy, 20 minutes of spaceflight and really nothing positive about the program. They literally spend more time discussing Russia's successes at the time than anything NASA did. It is a very adept attempt at revisionist history.… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
6
tropicAcesOct 12, 2018
Neil Armstrong is an American hero, Ryan Gosling is a great actor and Damien Chazelle is one of the best directors working today. But none of these things lend themselves to the simple, personal approach taken to an event of this magnitude. INeil Armstrong is an American hero, Ryan Gosling is a great actor and Damien Chazelle is one of the best directors working today. But none of these things lend themselves to the simple, personal approach taken to an event of this magnitude. I really wanted to love this movie, but so much of it just didn’t work..… Expand
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
3
VonSeuxDec 26, 2018
Very Boring, dark, and lacking emoton on almost every scene... the movie russian The Spacewalk is made arround similar events and is much much more engaging
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
5
qJan 25, 2019
"First Man" starts out well enough, but it gradually becomes cumbersome and somewhat boring. The epic length, the dialogue I had to keep rewinding and replaying at higher volumes through my stereo speakers so I could understand it, the"First Man" starts out well enough, but it gradually becomes cumbersome and somewhat boring. The epic length, the dialogue I had to keep rewinding and replaying at higher volumes through my stereo speakers so I could understand it, the overemphasis on melodrama involving the wife and kids, and the studied downplaying and internationalizing of what was a uniquely American triumph leaves the viewer with a feeling best summed up in one word: "meh." I am sure there is all manner of high-end filmmaking craft that effete artsy-fartsy critics might appreciate, but the movie fails in its most basic mission: to engage and entertain the viewer.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
3
shoulderoforionDec 14, 2018
Nope, this movie was a complete miss. Having been spoiled by The Right Stuff way back in 1983 (!!!) having shown this story in what is turning out to be the best possible way with the best possible cast, First Man was too dark, too moody,Nope, this movie was a complete miss. Having been spoiled by The Right Stuff way back in 1983 (!!!) having shown this story in what is turning out to be the best possible way with the best possible cast, First Man was too dark, too moody, looks like it was filmed with a potato inside a potato, melancholy mess of a picture wasn't worth the 2+ hours spend watching it. This director was trying for something and he didn't hit this barn with the elephant (potato) gun. uggh, this was bad in every way.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
5
dashtagOct 14, 2018
Honestly was disappointed. Maybe just not my type of movie, because I found 'First Man' to be very slow and repetitive, as well as dumb and cliche. It made happy and historic points of the story very sad, reflecting lots about family, andHonestly was disappointed. Maybe just not my type of movie, because I found 'First Man' to be very slow and repetitive, as well as dumb and cliche. It made happy and historic points of the story very sad, reflecting lots about family, and although it showed a different side of the story it definitely had issues. The movie was too long and had a very mellow tone. I can see why some people really enjoyed it but in the end, it had me disappointed.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
3
hellpittOct 23, 2018
I usually love movies by this actor...but this was just off...doesn't help that is not historical and borderlines science fiction.
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
5
FadeBlackOct 16, 2018
It was certainly not what I was expecting. Extremely low-key and understated. Felt a little bit like an Indy movie with some big budget side takes. On one hand I appreciate that they tried to give it a more distinctive style in a sea of spaceIt was certainly not what I was expecting. Extremely low-key and understated. Felt a little bit like an Indy movie with some big budget side takes. On one hand I appreciate that they tried to give it a more distinctive style in a sea of space movies, but a lot of it didn't work for me. The family stuff, there was some depth to that, but too much of it just came out bland and ineffective. There was definitely a great a mount of research and effort put into the NASA parts of the movie, but too much of it was procedural without any real tension. Now, the actual moon landing scenes were indeed quite beautiful, and as can be expected elevated the movie, but still it's hard to give it more than a 5, 5.5/10 at most.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
2
RainmaKer779Oct 17, 2018
Slow, uninspiring, and confused. Pivotal parts of the process not present. Neil Armstrong is portrayed as a diligent hard-working man and whose emotional intelligence is apparently so terrible that the director decided to not have RyanSlow, uninspiring, and confused. Pivotal parts of the process not present. Neil Armstrong is portrayed as a diligent hard-working man and whose emotional intelligence is apparently so terrible that the director decided to not have Ryan Gosling do anything note-worthy other than appearing stone-faced for the entire film. Two points for the amazing score.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
3
shermyOct 18, 2018
Just saw it and I felt I was sitting thru a couple of hours of schmaltz. If we aren't looking into Armstrong's eyes, we are looking at his wife's eyes. At least she had a part to play, and did it well, where as Gosling/Armstrong part was toJust saw it and I felt I was sitting thru a couple of hours of schmaltz. If we aren't looking into Armstrong's eyes, we are looking at his wife's eyes. At least she had a part to play, and did it well, where as Gosling/Armstrong part was to look and act like a statue of an astronaut. And it's hard to give much credit for astronaut risk and bravery at a time when 50,000 US military (including 14,000 draftees)were giving up there lives in Vietnam.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
0
ApollusNov 11, 2018
First Man was super boring and honestly a huge dishonor to history.
The writers and actors def thought they were making a deep movie. It was like purposely boring.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
8
LivingTribunalDec 26, 2018
The ost makes everything possible. It's another magic that space can create. When he finally landed on moon, it was so emotional that it made so many people cry including me. This film is feels like a 1 hour long waltz.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
Bertaut1Oct 26, 2018
Aesthetically laudable, emotionally vapid

More an intimate character drama than a grandiose examination of man's place in the cosmos, First Man is more concerned with domesticity than the actual journey to the moon, attempting to demonstrateAesthetically laudable, emotionally vapid

More an intimate character drama than a grandiose examination of man's place in the cosmos, First Man is more concerned with domesticity than the actual journey to the moon, attempting to demonstrate that behind the great moments of history exist personal demons and private motivations. Nothing wrong with that of course - contextualising small character beats against a larger historical canvas can produce compelling cinema. Terrence Malick's The Thin Red Line (1998), for example, uses the Battle of Guadalcanal as the background against which to engage personalised existential Heideggerian philosophical conundrums, whilst Michael Mann's Ali (2001) is more interested in Ali's private struggles outside the ring than his public bouts within it. However, for this kind of storytelling to work, one thing is essential - emotional connection. The audience must, in some way, care about the people on screen, otherwise their introspective problems are more than likely to feel like they are just getting in the way of the larger story. And that's exactly what happens in First Man - there is a lifelessness at the film's core, an emotional vapidity that can't be filled by exceptional technical achievements and laudable craft.

Based on James R. Hansen's, First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong (2005), the film begins in 1961, and hits all the beats you'd expect in the lead up to the Apollo 11 mission in 1969, including the death of his daughter, Karen (Lucy Stafford) from a brain tumour; his marriage problems with his first wife, Janet (Claire Foy); the lunar landing alongside Buzz Aldrin (Corey Stoll); and his private sojourn to the Lunar East crater.

With this framework, the film remains tied almost exclusively to Armstrong's perspective, with the occasional shift to Janet. It sets itself the task of penetrating this most private of men, explaining why he was so driven, even to the detriment of his family. And herein lies perhaps the film's most egregious failing. It's as if director Damien Chazelle and screenwriter Josh Singer think the Apollo 11 mission isn't interesting enough by itself - there needs to be some kind of deeper "why" behind the whole enterprise.

In any case, the attempts to tease out the inner workings of Armstrong's mind don't really work, as he remains very much in his own world - no matter what Gosling, Chazelle, and Singer do to dress him up, Armstrong comes across as aloof and interiorised. Partly at fault here is Gosling's performance, with its fulcrum of emotionless stoic masculinity. Instead of giving the character hidden depth, the few discernible traits he possesses make him something of a cardboard cut-out, a 21st-century screenwriter's idea of what an American man who grew up in the 40s and 50s should be.

Another issue is that the filmmakers choose to locate Armstrong's primary motivation in the death of Karen, which is presented with a mawkish sentimentality, as Chazelle attempts to link Karen's death with Armstrong's determination - as she is dying, he holds her and looks wistfully into the sky, and on the moon's surface, he drops her bracelet into the Lunar East crater and cries a few tears. The problem lies in the overkill, detracting from whatever genuine emotion such details should evoke. Every time we see Gosling stare yearningly into the sky, the potency of the film is diluted just a little bit more.

Did he really drop the bracelet into the crater? We don't know. However, for me, the whole thing comes across as far too syrupy, an amateur psychological profiling of a man who was intensely private. I would have much preferred the Lunar East trip to remain a mystery - by showing us what they think might have happened, Hansen, Singer, and Chazelle cheapen the intensely personal nature of the moment, which Armstrong obviously chose to keep secret for a reason.

Make no mistake, however, the lunar landing itself is beyond spectacular, with Justin Hurwitz's incredible music and Linus Sandgren's superb cinematography coming into their own. The sequence was shot in 70mm IMAX, and it makes extraordinary use of the larger frame, with the first panorama of the lunar surface almost as awe-inspiring as anything in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) or The Tree of Life (2011). An especially well-directed part of the lunar descent is that rather than lay down a busy foley track, Chazelle pulls out the sound altogether, creating an eerie, otherworldly moment that literally gave me goosebumps.

However, despite the magisterial last 30 minutes, and some sporadically well-handled moments, First Man is underwhelming, and, for long portions, interminably dull. As good as that final sequence is, it's no compensation for the plodding and lifeless two hours that precede it.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
5
clarkaddisonOct 27, 2018
Ryan is stoic, too the part where I think he is trying to hard. The first man, roll credits, to walk on the moon would have acted differently. This was based on a book and real life but I can feel Hollywoods touch in this and it takes me outRyan is stoic, too the part where I think he is trying to hard. The first man, roll credits, to walk on the moon would have acted differently. This was based on a book and real life but I can feel Hollywoods touch in this and it takes me out of it. 10/10 if it was just the space montages and flights.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
10
ClariseSamuelsJan 20, 2019
Space exploration movies, especially those based on a true story, are always riveting. First Man is no exception. Unlike the film Apollo 13, which explored the friendship and solidarity between Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert, and Fred Haise, thisSpace exploration movies, especially those based on a true story, are always riveting. First Man is no exception. Unlike the film Apollo 13, which explored the friendship and solidarity between Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert, and Fred Haise, this film focuses on the professional and emotional journey of one astronaut, Neil Armstrong (Ryan Gosling), who holds a place in history for being the first human being to set foot on the fine powder that pervades the surface of the moon.

Clearly, there was teamwork involved in this endeavor as well. Armstong did not fly to the moon by himself—he was accompanied by Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins. Nevertheless, even though his crewmates were with him the whole time, and the interdependency between them was obvious, Armstrong’s fierce inner strength, and his laconic and terse inability to express his deepest emotions both at home and at work, depict him as an iconic loner. It was not just one small step for [a] man and one giant leap for mankind, it was a giant leap for astronaut Neil Armstrong as an individual and a man whose personal journey had literally taken him to the moon.

Director Damien Chazelle beautifully balances the professional man with the private individual, who was difficult to live with as a spouse, who loved his children but could not always demonstrate paternal affection, and who respected his copilots even as he distanced himself from them. Generally unknown or forgotten details about Neil Armstrong come to light in this screenplay, such as the fact that he lost a 2-year-old daughter to brain cancer in 1962. Given his impassive and stoic personality, he was never completely able to assimilate his grief. He is shown dropping his daughter’s bracelet in a moon crater during his 22-hour Apollo 11 lunar exploration. Although this scene is not wholly based on fact, Armstrong did wander away from Aldrin briefly to spend a few minutes by himself at the edge of what is known as Little West Crater. This went against the scripted actions that had been carefully planned before the launch. It was thought he might have left something there as a memento, not uncommon practice for astronauts who walked on the moon. Armstrong’s biographer suspected he left something from his daughter, as did others. Also, not generally known was that Armstrong was probably not NASA’s first choice to be first man. He was shoved to the head of the line with the death of Gus Grissom, who perished in a flash fire during a “plugs-out” test. Grissom was purported to be lined up for commanding the first lunar landing mission.

As a strong-willed, hard-working Midwesterner from Ohio, Armstrong was not the easiest character to depict on screen. He was not glamorous or flamboyant, his life was scandal-free, and he avoided the limelight. Ryan Gosling attempts to recreate this inner and dispassionate strength, which was a kind of discrete reserve worn like a protective armor. The portrayal is accurate, but for those who have never experienced the quiet, unflappable self-restraint of a certain kind of Midwestern personality, it may have appeared that Gosling was underacting. He wasn’t. As for Claire Foy in the role of Armstrong’s wife Janet, she has demonstrated what appears to be an infinite acting range. She has effortlessly glided from a flawless portrayal of the young Queen Elizabeth II to an equally flawless portrayal of a Midwestern (from Illinois) suburban housewife who has to stay home to mind the kids, bravely live her life in the dark shadow of possible widowhood, and give her difficult astronaut husband a ton of support. Also noteworthy, the moon landing scenes and the eerie silence of space as the astronauts approach the lunar surface make this film an almost mystical experience.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
eagleeyevikingMay 19, 2020
Workmanlike in its approach and deeply personal, while showing the importance of determination, struggle, and failure to achieve success, "First Man" is technically and emotively flawless.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
BioTofuNov 2, 2018
the shaky cam felt very unnecessary and it was giving me slight motion sickness. i thought the shakiness was a reflection of armstrongs inner self but the whole damn movie it just shoke nonstop even when characters are just sitting still on athe shaky cam felt very unnecessary and it was giving me slight motion sickness. i thought the shakiness was a reflection of armstrongs inner self but the whole damn movie it just shoke nonstop even when characters are just sitting still on a chair. then a lot of the scenes felt like the director just threw his camera and a broken flashlight into a tumble dryer and those scenes would go on for ever. most of the time the audience is just confused at what is going on on the screen. armstrongs character was also so distant and unlikable compared to some of his colleagues, which really made it hard for me to understand him. if you like the style of lincoln you might like this movie. but I thought lincoln was much more interesting to watch… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
AxeTJan 13, 2019
Earnest visceral and intimate treatment of most important of historical events widely covered in all manner and lodged in the cultural consciousness for 50 years, this does add a stylistically contemporary cinematic updating that puts youEarnest visceral and intimate treatment of most important of historical events widely covered in all manner and lodged in the cultural consciousness for 50 years, this does add a stylistically contemporary cinematic updating that puts you there perhaps more than ever before. It's also needlessly prolonged in its annoyingly too tight handheld photography which should have been more measured for effect! Surprisingly it drags even more than epics typically do considering its new look into the real hero's personal life.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
WidewadatNov 2, 2018
Predictable and over-dramatized. Mediocre cinematography, shaking cameras and very obvious music leading to and underlining every single dramatic moment. Characters are dimensionless and don't change, neither learn anything. The movie doesn'tPredictable and over-dramatized. Mediocre cinematography, shaking cameras and very obvious music leading to and underlining every single dramatic moment. Characters are dimensionless and don't change, neither learn anything. The movie doesn't address any problematic topics, doesn't teach anything, doesn't explore any emotions and isn't much entertaining. The acting is fine, but the whole plot is just boring.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
The3AcademySinsJul 22, 2019
The third film from Damien Chazelle definitely does its best to change up his formula, and he does a fantastic job of expanding on his style. The music and production design are incredible, as is par for the course. Ryan Gosling gives aThe third film from Damien Chazelle definitely does its best to change up his formula, and he does a fantastic job of expanding on his style. The music and production design are incredible, as is par for the course. Ryan Gosling gives a grounded, breathtaking performance, and does a lot of justice to Neil Armstrong as he is portrayed in James R. Hansen's novel. The cinematography is top notch, and apart from being unnecessarily slow at times, this is a wonderful real-life drama.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
DubeauJan 19, 2019
What I loved the most in First man are the trials before the actual launch. Yet we only have to see a bit of them. The story slow down a lot when it comes to the personal life and makes the film sluggish. I really like the death aspect of theWhat I loved the most in First man are the trials before the actual launch. Yet we only have to see a bit of them. The story slow down a lot when it comes to the personal life and makes the film sluggish. I really like the death aspect of the movie. It make the experience emotional. The acting was very good all the way around. The music is on point in tense moments. I give it 72%. This is not to the level of Apollo 13 or Gravity but still interesting to watch.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
freeKade1kaJul 14, 2019
Excellent movie. Ryan Gosling perfect as always. Damien Chazelle can't make bad movie
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
AndrewBurgeMar 2, 2019
Just what kind of man must you be not only to undergo the first ever Moon landing, but to do it with such a lack of fear despite having an insight into the amount of risks you undertake. Neil Armstrong, at least how he was portrayed by RyanJust what kind of man must you be not only to undergo the first ever Moon landing, but to do it with such a lack of fear despite having an insight into the amount of risks you undertake. Neil Armstrong, at least how he was portrayed by Ryan Gosling here, was such a man.

The first few scenes depict him flying a rocket plane when it inadvertently bounced off the atmosphere. He has a brush with death as he attempts to land it in the Mojave Desert. He succeeds, but for a man who has just been in the atmosphere a couple of minutes ago, then had a near-fatal crash, he was unmoved. Some people find this bland, but I find it fascinating. Not to mention the power of the scene was helped by Justin Hurwitz's ambitious score and Damien Chazelle's precise direction. The noises were brief, hard-hitting, the cogs could be heard breaking apart and the frames were mostly stationary feeling like an impact.

The film is also careful to make sure to keep you entertained even during the times when Neil is not in the cockpit. Of course, these moments are not as tense, they can't be, but Damien Chazelle crafts his opaque personality in a clever way. Early in the film, he loses Karen, his two-year-old daughter, to a brain tumor. This is the first of the many funeral scenes in the film. Throughout the film, he only mentions her once, to his colleague, Ed (Jason Clarke), but you can feel he is always thinking about her.

Somehow, Gosling's content portrayal carries this film. He remains apparently unmoved to the countless deaths of astronauts testing the Apollo Mission rocket, he always keeps a certain distance from his family. His wife, Janet (Claire Foy) is the one who from time to time breaks his wall and she is truly strong. But his pain does not come from fear to his job, as he loves it, but from loss. Always looking up at the Moon, maybe, just maybe, thinking that Karen is somewhere over there.

This might seem far-fetched, but his ambition is brought by pain. In the final scenes, when he steps on the Moon, he looks around as if he is not impressed, but disappointed. There is nothing and in the end, he drops Karen's bracelet on the ground and realizes this is it. This is all there is to it.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
DouglasreynholmJan 24, 2019
This isn't just a normal biopic about the famous Apollo 11 mission and the first man on the moon. This is a movie about how a person deals with tragedy with the events of the horrifying events of how dangerous the mission was. AmazingThis isn't just a normal biopic about the famous Apollo 11 mission and the first man on the moon. This is a movie about how a person deals with tragedy with the events of the horrifying events of how dangerous the mission was. Amazing performances from everyone. As well have a fantastic score that stays with you forever. Damien Chazelle shows that he isn't just a jazz fan.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
garmonboziaNov 27, 2018
This is again a movie which is clearly over-hyped. I agree that the performances are good (especially Claire Foy). Neil Armstrong wasn't too charismatic so I understand why Gosling chose to play him with this stoic attitude and empty stares.This is again a movie which is clearly over-hyped. I agree that the performances are good (especially Claire Foy). Neil Armstrong wasn't too charismatic so I understand why Gosling chose to play him with this stoic attitude and empty stares. He also showed very real emotions in a couple of more dramatic scenes. But in the end this character wasn't really that interesting. I agree that trials of getting to the moon are shown in a thrilling manner. I disagree that the landing on the Moon in this movie was particularly spectacular. It was OK, but kinda meh. The surface of the Moon is cratered, grey and dusty - that's it. The real fuss was about the emotional journey. In this movie the screenwriter and director decided to tell the story from the point of a family drama. This is the strongest aspect of the movie. Armstrong is portrayed as someone who didn't manage to cure his daughter, so he is determined to go to the moon despite all the odds. We saw him searching for the treatment for her. In his opinion he probably failed her. So it is a promise he made (to himself / to her?) that he will never fail again. I know that people make a lot of strange stuff "for their loved ones" and a lot of times those things are like an ego driven wishes, dressed up as a tribute to lost ones. I'm OK with it. But it was almost the only thing that kept this movie arc together. The movie tries to base it's emotional payoff on a very oscar-baity scene, that nobody can confirm ever happened in real life. So is it a lie?, probability?, assumption ??? Not a good way to end the journey. It's not a bad movie. It's a bit slow and blurs the lines between real events and pure fantasy. The ending was just to emotionally manipulative for me and clearly an oscar-bait.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
BigbroOct 21, 2018
Ok look I'm sorry that people really enjoyed this movie however I was not one of those people to me it was nothing but super slow and boring I should have stuck with my original plan and skipped all together so not worth
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
StraciatellasOct 24, 2018
I was really looking forward to this movie, mainly because of the newest co-op between Damien Chazelle and Ryan Gosling. On some levels, First Man met the expectations. It's informative, host to some great acting by Ryan Gosling and ClaireI was really looking forward to this movie, mainly because of the newest co-op between Damien Chazelle and Ryan Gosling. On some levels, First Man met the expectations. It's informative, host to some great acting by Ryan Gosling and Claire Foy, and overall pretty decent to watch. However, for me personally, the choice to make the movie more documentary like in cinematography didn't pay off as well as I would have hoped. At the beginning it was OK, but as the movie progressed it sometimes felt like the cinematography was part of a low budget "let's not have too many special effects" choice. The shocky images even made me nauxious from time to time watching it in the theater. For me the acting in the movie saved it from an even lower grade. All in all it definitely wasn't a waste of time, but for me it's not in the "must-watch-again" category.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
deecatOct 26, 2018
One small step for man, one giant stumble for the filmmakers.

The movie was less about space and more about a man coping with the death of his young daughter. It had the potential to be an emotional rollercoaster, but honetly it failed toOne small step for man, one giant stumble for the filmmakers.

The movie was less about space and more about a man coping with the death of his young daughter. It had the potential to be an emotional rollercoaster, but honetly it failed to lauch.The characters in this movie were dull and distant, at times it felt like a documentry about cold serial killers. The cinematography was another misstep. Regardless of the scene, the camera was shaking and focus pumping every 2 seconds, akin to watching the movie in a MASTIF gimbal rig.

I believe Clint Eastwood or Mel Gibson would have been a much better choice of director. Clint would have given the characters a soul and Mel would haven given the film a sense of awe and grandeur. Instead the film was a depressing dirge, a funeral march to the moon.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
s26205229Feb 15, 2019
This movie is amazing. I think the reason it’s been mischaracterized as “slow” and “boring” is because people were expecting a space action movie. Apparently, they didn’t read the title. Yes it’s very different than Apollo 13 or even TheThis movie is amazing. I think the reason it’s been mischaracterized as “slow” and “boring” is because people were expecting a space action movie. Apparently, they didn’t read the title. Yes it’s very different than Apollo 13 or even The Right Stuff, but it’s SUPPOSED to be. They didn’t want to give you the same things you get from those other movies. They wanted this movie to be unique, and it is. And they did an excellent job of it.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
Eaj6Oct 8, 2019
Truly one of my favorite movies about space journeys and moon landings. The attention to detail and accuracy amazed me. Also the cinematography was absolutly stunning! I loved it when the Apollo 11 spacecraft launched. I fully recommend this movie!
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
JiricekisbestAug 31, 2019
An amazing movie about landing on the moon. Maybe it is a pity that there is too much family and not so much training and the trip itself to the moon. The effects in this movie are very well done and I don't blame the film for winning anAn amazing movie about landing on the moon. Maybe it is a pity that there is too much family and not so much training and the trip itself to the moon. The effects in this movie are very well done and I don't blame the film for winning an Oscar. Maybe the truth is that the songs and sounds don't appear much here and that the film will be drawn to the end, but it is still a very well-made film with great acting performances.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
Amir11Sep 15, 2019
It's amazing! Just outstanding and very real. Everything seems to be best. Story is simple but, with this crew, nothing is going to be simple...
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
Josephgamers65Jun 5, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. First Man is one of my fav movies of 2018 I love the beginning of space like apollo 13 first man apollo 13 is one of my fav movies from that This movie is about Neil Armstrong going to the moon on Apollo 11 while his daughter had cancer she died which really messed with Neil that started him to really not have to speak to Elliot is one of his friends loses him also I believe in a crash than an apollo one had a fire that made him more more emotion for him for his character so he does not what to say anymore to his wife and his kids also this movie is good very good accurate of Neil Armstrong pass and the space mission also I do like this is focused on Neil Armstrong, not just the mission you care what Neil Armstrong is going through the shots In this movie is so beautiful I love space so watching this movie is just remarkable one of my fav scenes in this entire movie is the bracelet scene was emotional to watch Ryan Gosling as Neil Armstrong is really good it make since why he does what he does people say that it is not that strong it is to me it make since why he acts like that now the really only thing what is holding this back to me is that runtime it is a little long so u start to wonder is it going to pick up from the beginning not really But this movie is one of my fav space movies and my fav movie from 2018 so I give First Man an B+… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
HollywoodGleeNov 27, 2019
First Man (2018), a newly released biopic on the Space Era Neil Armstrong, from self-
claimed film auteur and Academy Award-Winning Director, Damian Chazelle (La La Land), hits all the marks for a successful box office take in the currentFirst Man (2018), a newly released biopic on the Space Era Neil Armstrong, from self-
claimed film auteur and Academy Award-Winning Director, Damian Chazelle (La La Land), hits all the marks for a successful box office take in the current climate. First Man has already received nominations for best film from the Oscar-campaign-launching, Venice International Film Festival (Golden Lion Award) and the massive Toronto International Film Festival (The People’s Choice Award).

Oscar-winning, La La Land composer extraordinaire, Justin Hurwitz, returns to the Chazelle fold, bringing slightly more than is required for effect with a mesmerizing First Man score. Hurwitz creates such a beautiful composition it is easy to overlook its occasional intrusiveness. Linus Sandgren (Best Cinematography Oscar for La La Land) is also back with his roving camera movement which is a bit dizzying. For the most part, despite a jar or two (not surprising with Sandgren’s camera shooting style) Editor Tom Cross, kept the flow fairly continuous, if not seamless. And, last but not least, Canadian-born actor, Ryan Gosling, resumes his La La Land Sebastian minimalist acting style, as Neil Armstrong. Jason Clarke and Kyle Chandler provide excellent supporting characters as Edward Higgins White and Deke Slayton. Claire Foy turns in the film’s deep, emotional performance as Janet Armstrong, wife of Neil Armstrong, that the other characters either don’t bring or can’t bring to the story. Gosling almost gets there! The costuming, hair, makeup and production design all add credence to the depicted period in a convincing manner.

All in all, First Man is a nicely done film and it moves Director Chazelle up a notch on the Hollywood list of bigger budgeted films. Surprisingly, or unsurprisingly, Steven Spielberg received an Executive Producer credit. Nevertheless. the opening sequence, glaringly fails. The imagery is blatantly and conspicuously shot in an empty studio. I know Chazelle felt the lack of a bigger budget with La La Land not only curtailed his efforts but hamstrung his vision of a big-production, Hollywood-style musical of yesteryear. I like all three of Director Chazzelle’s full-length, feature films; Whiplash (2014) La La Land (2016) and First Man (2018).

As I watched the credits roll yesterday night, I noticed the film was based on the New York Times Bestseller First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong from James R. Hansen (who seemingly makes a cameo in the film). Josh Singer [The Post (2017) and Spotlight (2015)] gets credit for the screenplay. In my opinion, the best part of the film, by far, is the special effects. And Chazelle shot on 35MM with IMAX cameras.

The spectacular rocket launches and the use of mirror-effects heighten sensibilities. Furthermore, the use of smoke and gasses also added a deft sense of the surreal and a touch of dream logic. Also, Chazelle pumps in some nice archival footage and effectively utilizes foreshadowing with early frames of daytime, lunar shots. Screenwriter Singer also weaves some heady lines referencing an often under-reported and underappreciated aspect of the Space Program and NASA. Rory Kennedy’s documentary, Above and Beyond: NASA’s Journey to Tomorrow recently aired on Discovery Channel, October 13th, and details NASA’s mission as a viable reporting agency on the health of Planet Earth and Singer encodes this concept as Armstrong is asked, “Why do we explore and travel in space?”

Smartly crafting a timely topic of space exploration and NASA, Chazelle and company manage to bring the vessel home and to fruition with another buzz-worthy, award-contending product with First Man. What the film does well, it does very well! Warmly recommended.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
TheEventsOf1989Jan 10, 2020
"First Man" is a haunting exploration of Neil Armstrong's emotional journey. While most of the major reveals are known, it still seems as though not many people are aware of Neil's struggles. There isn't any "Oh **** reveals, but most dramas"First Man" is a haunting exploration of Neil Armstrong's emotional journey. While most of the major reveals are known, it still seems as though not many people are aware of Neil's struggles. There isn't any "Oh **** reveals, but most dramas don't need any. The film is slow, that doesn't mean its boring. The visuals are excellent.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
AWESOM-0Jan 26, 2020
Very, very good movie. Ryan Gosling does a great job in portraying Mr Armstrong (assuming that’s how he was). Plus, anytime you can debunk two conspiracy theories at the same time, that’s a bonus.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
BrianMcCriticOct 12, 2018
From its performances to its technical achievements, First Man is a masterpiece. Damien Chazelle is putting himself in the conversation for one of the best young film makers of our time. Every shot is perfect with specific lighting choicesFrom its performances to its technical achievements, First Man is a masterpiece. Damien Chazelle is putting himself in the conversation for one of the best young film makers of our time. Every shot is perfect with specific lighting choices that added to the impact of certain scenes. It's not easy to get me emotionally invested within the first 20 minutes but the way Gosling portrays Neil Armstrong really got me early and often and Claire Foy is just as good if not better. I can't sing this films praises high enough it's a must see. Overall a 10 an A+(currently my favorite film of 2018).… Expand
12 of 26 users found this helpful1214
All this user's reviews
5
DefinitelyMaybOct 12, 2018
As a massive fan of Damien Chazelle's previous works ie Whiplash and La La Land, First Man is, unfortunately, his first dud and a massive disappointment. The issue with First Man is that it overall has a pretty tame direction, and a storyAs a massive fan of Damien Chazelle's previous works ie Whiplash and La La Land, First Man is, unfortunately, his first dud and a massive disappointment. The issue with First Man is that it overall has a pretty tame direction, and a story that really doesn't spring to life despite the remarkable achievement of its main hero. That hero, of course, is Neil Armstrong, played very well by Ryan Gosling, but is so devoid of life and lacks any substantial relationships that make First Man an overall tired pointless films that does very little with the material that is on offer. Whilst Chazelle does manage to make a lot of the action very tense and helps deliver strong performances by Gosling and Claire Foy, the amount of negatives outweigh the film as a whole. For example, the film begins with plentiful amounts of shaky cam and extreme close-ups that make the film very disorientating. Whilst this technique is great during the action scenes where we feel the vulnerability of the astronaut's craft, it makes little sense during the domestic scenes where the film just decides to focus on the faces of the characters most of the time. Another problem is that the plot of the film documents the time between 1961 to the first apollo mission, but little character and relationships are developed during the time, making it a snore for most of the time. The film could have easily explored the relationship between Janet or Buzz Aldrin with Neil Armstrong, but this is instead neglected and most of the side characters are nothing than mere plot devices or stereotypes (namely Buzz who acts like this hot shot throughout the film but never has one meaningful conversation with Neil at all!). Instead, most scenes or set pieces act like montages of everything Armstrong did leading up to Apollo 11. Another problem is that the film tries really hard to inject emotion through the death of his daughter. Whilst some people might think that is emotional or deep, I found it super forceful and given that Neil was a stoic character to begin with, the whole relationship thing with his dead daughter felt unearned and often quickly forgotten. Some of the CGI at the end was pretty bad and was unnecessary but the final space sequences was quite good. As Chazelle is obsessed with jazz and music, I found the music choices suprisingly dull and a bit of a hit and miss throughout the film. Most of the meaningful score only comes at the end when Apollo 11 happens. I suppose the film also has a pacing issue because Chazelle decides to focus on some aspects for a very long time ie the Gemini 8 test flights, whilst Apollo 11 actually feels very rushed. Perhaps the biggest problem is that Neil Armstrong is arguably not really an enduring character and there is nothing really meaningful to say about him. He is stoic and straight to the point, but one that never really grows or one that the audience learns anything more about him even by the end of the film.

First man is an overall bland experience which I did not expect after seeing Chazelle's previous works. Where the previous films had a main theme of characters with a craft driven to obsesssion and having to sacrifice their relationships, the problem with the 'Armstrong story' is that we all know what happens - he becomes a global hero and has a happy albeit reclusive life. There is nothing really more to say. If the film decided to focus more on the struggles to get to the Moon and more on Armstrong with the other astronauts (such as who wants to land first/whilst their colleagues kept dying) then I personally think that would've been a better film. First Man unfortunately won't be coming first in terms of this year better films...… Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
0
Lcs_alcantaraOct 22, 2018
eu nao gostei , esperava mais deste filme e do proprio ator no qual sou fã..nao foi dessa vezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
9
KeithDowOct 15, 2018
Damien Chazelle's perfect record remains intact. His third feature film, 'First Man,' is an extraordinary achievement in filmmaking and immediately becomes a front-runner for best movie of the year.

The technical aspects of the film areDamien Chazelle's perfect record remains intact. His third feature film, 'First Man,' is an extraordinary achievement in filmmaking and immediately becomes a front-runner for best movie of the year.

The technical aspects of the film are flawless. Everything from the writing to the cinematography to the sound design and score are as compelling as they are precise. Yet it's the pacing and emotion of the film--which are directly a result of Chazelle's exceptional directing--that complete the package, making 'First Man' his most audaciously planned and executed project to date.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
7
auburnnOct 22, 2018
Maybe not my type... This movie is super slow and dry that I almost fell asleep. And I don't like the dichotomy between family responsibility and patriotism. Although I do find the way Chazelle portrays the state politics dynamics to beMaybe not my type... This movie is super slow and dry that I almost fell asleep. And I don't like the dichotomy between family responsibility and patriotism. Although I do find the way Chazelle portrays the state politics dynamics to be compelling and sardonic.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
9
LamontRaymondOct 12, 2018
I would give First Man a 9 out of 10 (an outstanding film, better than most of the other films released in 2018), only if we can agree that The Right Stuff should be about 15. It's beautifully shot and an extremely intense first-personI would give First Man a 9 out of 10 (an outstanding film, better than most of the other films released in 2018), only if we can agree that The Right Stuff should be about 15. It's beautifully shot and an extremely intense first-person account. Claire Foy is incredible. It simply lacked much of the excitement that films like The Right Stuff had locked down.… Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
5
JEsFsFOct 13, 2018
okay. this movie has staked out it's niche. It's personally intimate. It's effective at literally getting in people's face. Inside a crowded Gemini cockpit: claustrophobic and chaotic. As majestic as the backdrop is, this film is as groundedokay. this movie has staked out it's niche. It's personally intimate. It's effective at literally getting in people's face. Inside a crowded Gemini cockpit: claustrophobic and chaotic. As majestic as the backdrop is, this film is as grounded as it gets, but not in a good way. Character studies have their value, but Armstrong, while an important man, while an iconic man, a First Man, is just not interesting man.… Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
3
Qgal5kapDec 27, 2018
Quite disappointed with this movie. Don't get me wrong, it doesn't totally suck, as there are many elements of it I enjoyed. BUT, in terms of story telling, it was dull and uninspiring. Hollywood has lost the ability to tell a story it seems.Quite disappointed with this movie. Don't get me wrong, it doesn't totally suck, as there are many elements of it I enjoyed. BUT, in terms of story telling, it was dull and uninspiring. Hollywood has lost the ability to tell a story it seems. This movie was 2.2hrs long, and I feel like I got 30 minutes of actual storytelling.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
0
SIPPIOJan 24, 2019
This movie is TERRIBLE...
old person~ "it happened, I heard it on the radio "
jokes aside~ Neil & Buzz aren't good people.. ESP BUZZ... Something bothered me when he wouldn't swear on the bible that he went to the moon & attacked theThis movie is TERRIBLE...
old person~ "it happened, I heard it on the radio "
jokes aside~ Neil & Buzz aren't good people..
ESP BUZZ... Something bothered me when he wouldn't swear on the bible that he went to the moon
& attacked the person..
**I don't watch those conspiracy videos but the popular ones find a way to creep in..
As far as the movie for movies sake= MEH,boring, and I couldn't finish it...… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
3
TrevorsViewDec 27, 2018
Plenty of justifications have been addressed why Americans think they live in the world’s greatest country, perhaps one of the most common being because they landed on old Luna before Russia. But unlike that giant leap mankind took, DamienPlenty of justifications have been addressed why Americans think they live in the world’s greatest country, perhaps one of the most common being because they landed on old Luna before Russia. But unlike that giant leap mankind took, Damien Chazelle’s attempt to recreate it in First Man takes three massive steps down after his last two projects set him on a hot streak. History’s youngest Best Director Oscar winner managed to accomplish the impossible: turning an important figure into a passive plot device with Bella Swan level personality.

The technical elements instead steal the focus, diminishing Neil Armstrong with unnecessary focused shots on a fly and a control panel’s Chinese takeout food that add no story significance. This emotional distance may be for the best though, as the story built around Neil features plenty unrealistic additions, most groanworthy being what he does with his dead daughter’s bracelet. Even Interstellar might mock its ridiculousness! Riding off that other 2001: A Space Odyssey wannabee, important details are disregarded, including international contribution to NASA, allowing key milestones to merely happen to each character, particularly Neil’s wife, Janet, who’s worse written than any pre-Force Awakens Star Wars female. At least those ugly Star Wars prequels had actual image contrast, unlike the bad color grading of this movie, which gives an ugly texture put together by someone who let success override his head. However, taking the pre-production design process into account, a nice attention on using cool vs. warm colors juxtaposes Janet’s baby blue dress against the Apollo 11’s bright jet flames. Mary Zophres’ costumes (La La Land, True Grit) are surprisingly detailed as they take on an impression of wanting to be like moonbeams: a pure, straight path, but not quite able to get there... they look more often like the chaos of a nuclear explosion. Yes, every crisp design choice matches an era of new beginnings, unlike Neil’s turmoil of losing his daughter to brain cancer. Especially after the dark, scary opening scene when Neil first hits Earth’s thermosphere, enough justification guarantees chills with every view beyond the clouds.

Many say this feature must only be seen in IMAX, and honestly, it’s true. From the Gemini 5’s radio that rattles your ears to the documentary-esque camera cropped closer than usual, Neil’s nauseous claustrophobia becomes instantly comprehensible. Then after the sounds of the ship boom out of control, complete space silence takes Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 classic to heart. It forces prolonged depth into infinity’s empty black void beyond Earth’s blue aura; then this Kubrickian style turns simultaneously epic on the ground with a heavy landing on the Mojave Desert, an intro that would make Steven Spielberg proud. Also, when they reach the moon’s surface, despite the controversy, a US flag does show up! It’s just not seen being planted in! Thus, you can stop getting mad about it.

You can get mad instead at the way Ryan Gosling (Half Nelson, La La Land) plays Neil Armstrong without any believability. Ryan acts the same as he did in Blade Runner 2049, just staring with eyes half-open as if confused about how to play the role properly, worse than Amy Adams’ grossly mediocre Arrival performance. One might very well call Neil a replicant in this case as he barely even reacts to a training simulator. His nonexistent effort turns extra noticeable though on the earth’s soil, as him listening to “Lunar Rhapsody” with Janet feels unromantic. Both Ryan and Claire Foy probably felt very confused about how to portray their respective roles because of the perplexing scene arrangements which beg you to question, “why does any of this matter?” For instance, most of their impersonal conversations are filmed from behind as if this was a low-budget romantic period piece/failed Oscar bait.

It’s unbelievable how Josh Singer, who won an Oscar for the tremendous Spotlight, now turns out one of 2018’s worst screenplays, blocking all the genuine difficulties felt that tell us new, personal facts about Neil Armstrong and his family. Everybody becomes a plot device pushing events forward, technology often left to work instead to hand out exposition. One is an old informational video that replaces conflict to give out crucial information, which honestly just looks lazy. Besides, we already know they will succeed, so why would any of this matter?

Although the core problem with First Man is a lot deeper than just a lousy script, it’s worse even than historical accuracy—the most common issue with biopics (this one is relatively true to what really happened). The core problem is that this film uses a man’s life as an excuse to create cinematic spectacle. How would you like it if somebody took a milestone of your life, removed all fears leading up to that milestone, and replaced it with empty, pretty pictures?… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
AryanYOct 20, 2018
This movie isn't for everyone. It's slow, boring and sluggish at certain parts of the film, but it's still an amazing movie with beautiful cinematography and it's bolstered by Claire Foy's performance.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
9
olivermetaOct 12, 2018
The scenes in space are very exhilarating. The movie feels very authentic and true to the real obstacles, and realistic technology. There could have been more done to bring the true scale of the exhibition in the public eye, which was onlyThe scenes in space are very exhilarating. The movie feels very authentic and true to the real obstacles, and realistic technology. There could have been more done to bring the true scale of the exhibition in the public eye, which was only done later in the film after the success or failures of the mission. It felt also true to the astronauts isolated to the public eye, and I believe it was heavily focused on providing their vantage point from start to finish. I would give this movie an 8.5/10.… Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
0
xsu-ecJan 17, 2019
Worst movie I've ever seen... At least last 5 years... ZERO effects, ZERO operator work. Each of us can make half time of that movie same quality screen motion with iPhone & Table & dark Pocket & piece of cloth & some well formed chalk orWorst movie I've ever seen... At least last 5 years... ZERO effects, ZERO operator work. Each of us can make half time of that movie same quality screen motion with iPhone & Table & dark Pocket & piece of cloth & some well formed chalk or salt or piece of soap
remember this tweet...
To compare, and feel the difference try to watch i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Pioneers or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salyut_7_(film) (both of them deserve to be seen)… Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
9
Compi24Oct 13, 2018
This is without a doubt one of the best movies of the year. You're given an intensely personal story from the get-go, delivered with an impeccable eye for imagery and a collection of some of the finest acting I've seen all year. Oh, also itThis is without a doubt one of the best movies of the year. You're given an intensely personal story from the get-go, delivered with an impeccable eye for imagery and a collection of some of the finest acting I've seen all year. Oh, also it just so happens to be portraying what many would argue is one of humanity's most pivotal moments. That's no small feat, and director Damien Chazelle handles the challenge in stride, serving up a cinematic docudrama that I'll not soon forget.… Expand
5 of 15 users found this helpful510
All this user's reviews
8
moviemitch96Oct 12, 2018
This was definitely the intriguing, awe-inspiring crowd pleaser I was hoping it'd be! Ryan Gosling fulfilled the role of Neil Armstrong quite well and tackled his larger than life story wonderfully! And despite knowing a lot about how thisThis was definitely the intriguing, awe-inspiring crowd pleaser I was hoping it'd be! Ryan Gosling fulfilled the role of Neil Armstrong quite well and tackled his larger than life story wonderfully! And despite knowing a lot about how this great historical event went down prior to seeing this, there were still plenty of tense moments accompanied by a great film score and tight editing throughout that managed to make it thoroughly compelling to watch! Overall, yes it may be pretty standard in terms of biopics, but it doesn't get much more inspiring (or patriotic for that matter) than this!… Expand
4 of 12 users found this helpful48
All this user's reviews
7
mikeydodoOct 13, 2018
This is a good movie. It's more historical in nature than exciting. It does have some exciting moments, but there's only so many times and ways you can tell the story of going to the moon. Gosling was good, Claire Foy was great. It was tooThis is a good movie. It's more historical in nature than exciting. It does have some exciting moments, but there's only so many times and ways you can tell the story of going to the moon. Gosling was good, Claire Foy was great. It was too long for me. It would have worked better at 2hr or 1hr 45 rather than 2hrs 15.… Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
7
ProteusOct 14, 2018
Not a crowd pleaser, not a deep psychological story, not a thriller, not an effective drama. What is this movie? I see why the audience reactions are tepid. It seems like something big, something dramatic should be happening....so where isNot a crowd pleaser, not a deep psychological story, not a thriller, not an effective drama. What is this movie? I see why the audience reactions are tepid. It seems like something big, something dramatic should be happening....so where is it?
The director never delivers.… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
8
MattyiceOct 15, 2018
First Man's themes (similar to Chazelle's other movies), cinematography, sound design, score, and climax are major accomplishments and deserve awards recognition. However, the ability to like this movie is almost completely reliant on theFirst Man's themes (similar to Chazelle's other movies), cinematography, sound design, score, and climax are major accomplishments and deserve awards recognition. However, the ability to like this movie is almost completely reliant on the viewer's attention spans, because this movie is a slow burner at many points and Gosling's acting, while great, can be a bit wooden based on Neil's bland personality in real life. I personally liked this movie a lot, but understand how others can find it boring considering an adventure about Apollo 11 and space travel should be exhilarating.… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
9
nj06Oct 29, 2018
The movie is slow and introverted, exactly like its subject. At times, it is a bit boring, but for me, the last 30 minutes were worth any pain and boredom. The music is gorgeous and that whole part is at the same time triumphant andThe movie is slow and introverted, exactly like its subject. At times, it is a bit boring, but for me, the last 30 minutes were worth any pain and boredom. The music is gorgeous and that whole part is at the same time triumphant and heartbreaking. Those scenes were good enough for me to elevate the whole movie to a superb level. Pure perfection in my opinion. I was particularly moved by the scene when as the whole world is celebrating, Neal Armstrong is reminiscing about his daughter and throwing her bracelet into a moon canyon. I loved the main character and the way Ryan Gosling captured him. I felt enormous empathy for him, I also loved his quiet heroism (such stark contrast with blowhardery of what we see these days on TV and in movies), his broken soul, and his steadfast consistency. I will definitely see this movie again. It very much brought back my childhood fascination with the space, moon, Apollo program, etc (more than any other movie about that era, and I have seen them all). This is a smart and subdued movie, that beautifully encapsulated the colossal challenge and achievement of going to the moon and getting back for the first time. I LOVED IT!!… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
4
s053714Jan 29, 2019
This movie is really slow. The special effects are cheap and even the musical score is often inappropriate and sometimes annoying. The editing is also mystifying, with sequences of high drama suddenly cut to children playing. They gaveThis movie is really slow. The special effects are cheap and even the musical score is often inappropriate and sometimes annoying. The editing is also mystifying, with sequences of high drama suddenly cut to children playing. They gave this movie to the wrong director. I'd love to see what Ron Howard or Clint Eastwood could have done with this story. This was a huge disappointment for me.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
LegendaryLassDec 14, 2018
If you like quiet, dialogue-less reflections (and you can stay awake through them), Chazelle may have a film for you. Claire Foy delivers the sleeper performance of the film, but the bulk of the time we spend watching Gosling silently lookIf you like quiet, dialogue-less reflections (and you can stay awake through them), Chazelle may have a film for you. Claire Foy delivers the sleeper performance of the film, but the bulk of the time we spend watching Gosling silently look at things and not much else. Who said no one could make rocket ships blasting off to the moon uninteresting?… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
johnem95Oct 12, 2018
"First Man" is a personal look at one of American culture's humblest heroes, with space sequences so overwhelming, they'll single-handedly make you respect Neil all the more.
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
7
SeussMyTubOct 21, 2018
The space sequences are great, but the rest of the movie is pretty much underwhelming. Delves too deeply into Armstrong's family life, yet there is little to show for it. Gosling also portrays him like a robot- the real Armstrong was justThe space sequences are great, but the rest of the movie is pretty much underwhelming. Delves too deeply into Armstrong's family life, yet there is little to show for it. Gosling also portrays him like a robot- the real Armstrong was just modest, not uncaring.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
9
AlfatriMuhOct 13, 2018
The Good:
1. Original score, i would watch the film once again for the music alone.
2. Technical aspects (such camera movement and visual effect), using first person view was a good choice for such 'thrilling-biographical' movie like this,The Good:
1. Original score, i would watch the film once again for the music alone.
2. Technical aspects (such camera movement and visual effect), using first person view was a good choice for such 'thrilling-biographical' movie like this, it's too shaky for me though.
3. Tense build-up, second half of the film was the best.

Moderate:
1. Acting, nothing so special about the acting from both leading cast, but still a solid performance.
2. Story-telling/plot, the film was very long, but there's no much dialog, also the timeline moving way too fast compared with its slow-pace.

The Bad: Overlong and Slow-paced (especially first half through). I think 120-125 minutes was enough for this.

Conclusion: Easily becoming my top 3 Space-Drama film, alongside Interstellar and Gravity. 86/100… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
10
chariot123Oct 13, 2018
This movie had me glued to the screen the whole time, anyone who hasn't seen this should watch it immediately, I wish I could turn around and go back in and watching again, Gosling was the perfect cast for this. Brilliant movie.
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
8
ricksmits777Oct 13, 2018
Thoroughly enjoyable. Fully deserves to join "The Right Stuff" and "Apollo 13" in an epic telling of a subject that so many of us find irresistible and magic. One little whinge. Chazelle's use of the shaky camera is a little overdone.Thoroughly enjoyable. Fully deserves to join "The Right Stuff" and "Apollo 13" in an epic telling of a subject that so many of us find irresistible and magic. One little whinge. Chazelle's use of the shaky camera is a little overdone. Perfect for adding to the trepidation of mechanical failure, but too much when two wives are sharing their grief and concerns. Wonderful performances all-round. A must watch on as big a screen as you can find.… Expand
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
4
namelessOct 26, 2018
Well shot, interesting subject... maybe its me but Gosling use to be so good now he is a wooden cutout of himself. I thought it was maybe the movie but saw him promoting and he is the same way. It is like he has lost interest in the craft andWell shot, interesting subject... maybe its me but Gosling use to be so good now he is a wooden cutout of himself. I thought it was maybe the movie but saw him promoting and he is the same way. It is like he has lost interest in the craft and wants to do something else, and it shows.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
netflicOct 15, 2018
This is a biopic about the first man on the Moon, Neil Armstrong.
Space exploration is inherently a very dangerous business, especially human exploration, because, as we know, space is deadly. 
There are so many things that can (and often do)This is a biopic about the first man on the Moon, Neil Armstrong.
Space exploration is inherently a very dangerous business, especially human exploration, because, as we know, space is deadly. 
There are so many things that can (and often do) go wrong, with catastrophic consequences.
But human curiosity and drive for  knowledge push the mankind forward.
The more difficult an obstacle is, the more vigorous person it takes to beat it and prevail.
Authors of the movie tried to show how many losses Neil had to endure in his family life and due to the nature of this business. To do that, they used something like time-lapse technique, compressing 8 years of his life that led to the Apollo 11 mission to the Moon into two-hour-plus movie frame. I would not call execution of this time-lapse perfect.
But cinematography is amazing and two leads' performances are stellar.
Presence effect was such that I felt like I was inside the spaceship.
If you do not have motion sickness, go see it in a theater. It requires a huge screen.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
JLuis_001Nov 15, 2018
Damien Chazelle's most recent film left me with many mixed feelings especially because the film had made me believe that it would be a spectacular epic, but First Man is not one.

Chazelle has everything, the protagonist, a strong and solidDamien Chazelle's most recent film left me with many mixed feelings especially because the film had made me believe that it would be a spectacular epic, but First Man is not one.

Chazelle has everything, the protagonist, a strong and solid supporting cast. An impressive story and better yet; is a real one.
His growth as a filmmaker is incredibly evident, regardless of his achievements with La La Land. Ironically First Man is his best film as a director but not his best film as a whole.

And why do I say this? Because everything feels in its place and yet First Man is a film incapable of provoking emotion. Although we are shown the whole journey of Neil Armstrong in NASA until he reaches the moon and evidently the narrative is built for that climax moment in the story but honestly the film never manages to provide a memorable cataclysmic moment and feels cold and sterile, which evidently ends the journey with its simple ending.

I'm not disappointed but I'm not impressed either. It's a film that deserves your full attention but its excellent quality didn't leave me satisfied.

And before I forget it, go get the musical score because Justin Hurwitz did an amazing job.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
WayTooBadMar 18, 2022
This movie ruined Ryan Gosling in my eyes, I used to enjoy the roles he played, the silent strong and dangerous guy thinking he has a dimension which is not visible but there. Now he is just boring to death in my eyes.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
rescaOct 12, 2018
For this short amount of time, so much story is told. Truly a masterpiece. This is not what we want, but what we need to see.
3 of 13 users found this helpful310
All this user's reviews
1
thankyou1001Oct 12, 2018
It's a boring film. It seems to be made just because they want those awards.
7 of 33 users found this helpful726
All this user's reviews
10
MrMovieBuffOct 14, 2018
There is another user reviewer on this site who I respect named 'BrianMcCritic' who, in his review said that director Damien Chazelle is "one of the best young filmmakers of our time", I have to second that. 'First Man' is, in a word, aThere is another user reviewer on this site who I respect named 'BrianMcCritic' who, in his review said that director Damien Chazelle is "one of the best young filmmakers of our time", I have to second that. 'First Man' is, in a word, a masterpiece. A well made character study about an everyday man who makes the risky decision to fly to the moon and make history. We see Neil Armstrong (Ryan Gosling) living a somewhat quiet life, dealing with the loss of his daughter and trying to reason with his wife, Janet (a superb Claire Foy) and the rest of his kids. He goes through many tough training techniques and tries to properly assess himself if he is going to fly a great distance into space and away from the earth. There are so many effective uses of point-of-view shots throughout when Armstrong is flying many distances and even when things get out of control, director Chazelle wants you - the audience member - to feel the uneasy tension, there is a fantastic sequence in the middle of the film when Armstrong and another astronaut find themselves in a malfunctioning situation, and you will feel a little spent from the extended amount of time we are seeing them try to get out of the dangerous task. Obviously, you know what our main character achieves towards the end of his story, he does land on the moon, Chazelle cleverly makes this moment slow, building up the tension and leaving room for all the emotions to sink in. It's quiet, no music and very little dialogue. You feel as if you are there with Armstrong experiencing history. No other words can be used to describe this fantastic scene, you just have to see it for yourself. As I said above, this is a character study movie about Armstrong himself, and the decision he makes and his family's reaction to it. Don't go in thinking it's going to be some "Star Trek" style space adventure. It's about a man... "The First Man" so we say, his story involves everything we need to know about him here. It's a fascinating piece of filmmaking and storytelling, and one of the best movies of the year.… Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
9
Rebecca31Oct 20, 2018
Based on the book by James R. Hansen, First Man tells the story of NASA's mission to land on the moon, and the life of astronaut Neil Armstrong. 

It was interesting to see how Damien Chazelle would take on the moon landing with his last twoBased on the book by James R. Hansen, First Man tells the story of NASA's mission to land on the moon, and the life of astronaut Neil Armstrong. 

It was interesting to see how Damien Chazelle would take on the moon landing with his last two films being heavily music based. First Man shows us just how good of a story-teller he is. I normally like my space movies with a few aliens thrown in but I was fully invested in this story. I also wouldn't exactly know many details about the moon landing which may have helped keep me interested. Gosling seemed like a good choice for Neil Armstrong although I found his performance very cold and distant the emotion comes from the rest of the cast, particularly Claire Foy as Janet Armstrong. The attention to detail for the space crafts allows you to become fully immersed. Creating the sensation of claustrophobia, you really feel like you're in the space craft next to the astronauts. Justin Hurwitz has composed yet another beautiful score, not that I wouldn't have expected less, his use of Lunar Rhapsody throughout the film will give you the chills. It's gripping, emotional and highly recommended.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
8
Captain105Oct 15, 2018
First Man is like a unrefined piece of art. With music perfectly coordinated with the shots. But being unrefined has its problems as much as it has its advantages. Sometimes the realism gets out of control and after multiple incidents ofFirst Man is like a unrefined piece of art. With music perfectly coordinated with the shots. But being unrefined has its problems as much as it has its advantages. Sometimes the realism gets out of control and after multiple incidents of being shaken around you want to have a big reveal when they land on the moon. The movie is lacking the wonder and power of space. It show’s us the realism of the difficulties to get there.
It puts other space travel films to shame.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
7
DayveOct 13, 2018
I want to preface this review with the fact that I am NOT a Gosling fan. I think he is horrible, pretty much in every movie I have seen him in, this one included. Overall the movie was ok, interesting but Gosling just puts a damper on theI want to preface this review with the fact that I am NOT a Gosling fan. I think he is horrible, pretty much in every movie I have seen him in, this one included. Overall the movie was ok, interesting but Gosling just puts a damper on the movie for me. Some of the scenery was interesting, and I did not know about all the primer missions. Good movie, could have been way better with a different cast.… Expand
2 of 11 users found this helpful29
All this user's reviews
8
moviecritic68Oct 18, 2018
Thoroughly enjoyed this movie. Learned unknown facts about the personal life of Neil Armstrong. Sound track was awesome. As usual disregard the non-deserving negative ratings.
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
9
hof1991Oct 15, 2018
An excellent character study and look at the price paid by our heroes. Suspenseful (though everyone knows the end). Not for those who want lots of flagwaving or robots.
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
9
katezoeOct 15, 2018
Wonderful movie on the space program like we have never seen. Incredible performance by Ryan Gosling. Not your typical Hollywood movie. Understated, thoughtful and moving experience.
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
9
AaronRadcliffOct 14, 2018
Thanks to an all-star cast in front of the camera and another Best Director-worthy outing by Damien Chazelle, First Man just might be the best space movie we've had.
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
10
Amir84dorriOct 13, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film can remember again ''gravity''.ryan gosling into this movie best show of himself.This film new experience for director of la la land.… Expand
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
0
kiwijinxterOct 19, 2018
Watch Transformers: Dark of the Moon instead - it has more of the first men than "The First Man". It features the American flag, emotional robots, action, fantastic CGI, space travel, Kennedy, Obama, Neil Armstrong and even the REAL LIFE BuzzWatch Transformers: Dark of the Moon instead - it has more of the first men than "The First Man". It features the American flag, emotional robots, action, fantastic CGI, space travel, Kennedy, Obama, Neil Armstrong and even the REAL LIFE Buzz Aldrin actually makes a cameo appearance.… Expand
2 of 32 users found this helpful230
All this user's reviews
8
TVJerryOct 16, 2018
The opening sequence is an extended jet flight (with complications) from the cockpit POV. This sets up the perilous, sometimes inept situations in NASA's early space program…not all high tech and easy success. Ryan Gosling plays NeilThe opening sequence is an extended jet flight (with complications) from the cockpit POV. This sets up the perilous, sometimes inept situations in NASA's early space program…not all high tech and easy success. Ryan Gosling plays Neil Armstrong in this intimate look at the man, who was somewhat closed off (as was his wife, played by Claire Foy). Watching his career progress to the first moon landing is fascinating, but the noisy, claustrophobic, frantic missions go on too long and becomes more frustrating than tense. Director Damien Chazelle has instilled this version of space travel with his own closeup-crammed, warts-and-all portrait that's absolutely absorbing, but lite on emotional heft and profound impact.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
LoudSpeakerOct 28, 2018
The performance of Ryan Gosling and Claire Foy are outstanding. No doubts about that! But, in my opinion, the script could be better.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
alienchaosOct 29, 2018
The fact that they landed on the moon isn't the real story. It's how they got there. The scenes involving space flight literally put you right in them to experience them full force. It's definitely a movie where if you can get immersed in theThe fact that they landed on the moon isn't the real story. It's how they got there. The scenes involving space flight literally put you right in them to experience them full force. It's definitely a movie where if you can get immersed in the story, then you will find it insanely fantastic. But, if you aren't immersed, you probably will find it a bit boring and slow. However, the back story is essential to understanding the man who is so revered but poorly known outside of his family. This movie is a strong effort to explain his motivations and get away from the all-american hero image that is perpetrated still today.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
7
GinaKJan 28, 2019
A dour and surprisingly dull-spirited account of what I remember as an exciting time in America. I also remember that astronauts smiled back then, and still do today. I also remember America’s enthusiasm for the astronauts. By focusing soA dour and surprisingly dull-spirited account of what I remember as an exciting time in America. I also remember that astronauts smiled back then, and still do today. I also remember America’s enthusiasm for the astronauts. By focusing so much on the death of Armstrong’s daughter, Armstrong becomes a hollow man rather than a heroic one. My relatively high score for this film is for the hardware and convincing special effects and not for the depth and humanity that the director seems to deliberately omit from the astronauts’ lives.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
SoakerCityMar 3, 2020
A very good, very enjoyable film that might have benefitted from a less wooden lead, but hey maybe Neil Armstrong was that stern. I feel like we learned more about the situation than the man, who remains enigmatic, as portrayed by RyanA very good, very enjoyable film that might have benefitted from a less wooden lead, but hey maybe Neil Armstrong was that stern. I feel like we learned more about the situation than the man, who remains enigmatic, as portrayed by Ryan Gosling. The plot, cinemo, and effects are excellent, as is the supporting cast. This film was quite moving at many times. The space scenes and launches are extraordinarily well done. Inspiring.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
AndremaxFeb 4, 2019
First Man is so painfully boring that doesn't even open space for immersion, even with camera's cuts that in theory should passing sensation of suffocating lived by characters.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
marcmyworksDec 16, 2018
First man is probably one of the best movies of 2018, exploring the psychological battle Neil Armstrong went through during the Apollo space program in the 1960s. Though at times the film seems long and the shaky camera work jarring, it is anFirst man is probably one of the best movies of 2018, exploring the psychological battle Neil Armstrong went through during the Apollo space program in the 1960s. Though at times the film seems long and the shaky camera work jarring, it is an excellent film.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
8
MattBrady99Nov 9, 2018
“We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard”.

‘First Man’ is a lift off folks. A beautiful, yet melancholic look on a man’s journey to the moon. Focusing on grief“We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard”.

‘First Man’ is a lift off folks. A beautiful, yet melancholic look on a man’s journey to the moon. Focusing on grief and loss that can poison anyone's thoughts. At the end, you get the sad realization it was a suicide mission, not a heroic one. Making you think twice of wanting to be an astronaut.

Also, the stupid controversy surrounding the American flag is one of the most pointless up cries ever. Anywhere...

Ryan Gosling is great as Neil Armstrong. Now some people have criticized his performance as being “dull” or “stilted”. While not the most exciting or colorful performance of the year, but the same can be said about Armstrong as a person. Gosling performance as a calculated man who is somewhat cold to his family over a personal tragedy - it is more depressing when reflecting back. It makes it more powerful. I got more out of it than some people.

Claire Foy is also great - the relationship between her and Gosling is very believable. You really do feel her concerns, but frustration which was brilliantly represented, especially during the emotional scenes. However, I wish they wrote something better for Foy than play “the wife” at home.

Damien Chazelle, my main man. Back once again to blow my socks off. A complete departure compared to his previous films ‘Whiplash’ and ‘La La Land’, in terms of film making and themes. Visually striking with a 60’s-like archive look which fits the time period. The way Chazelles films space shuttles leaving earth’s atmosphere is terrifying, because it’s all from Neil’s point of view. One minute it’s blue sky, then pitch black. I think any movie that can me feel motion sickness is an achievement in my books. Plus the cinematography being shot on Techniscope cameras gives an organic and raw look. The close ups and tight spaces - it’s a claustrophobic nightmare.

The moon landing sequence is absolutely breathing and some of the best film making in the entire movie. It also contains one of the saddest scenes I've seen in awhile, which got my eyes leaking. I swear, if that didn’t happen and was made up for the movie, then I won’t be happy. Still, makes me wonder if Chazelle and Kubrick faked the moon landing together.

The sound design is incredible and adds to the fear of space travel. Whenever they leave earth’s orbit during the testing scenes with the shuttle rattling and the sound of mental weakening - you literally keep expecting the shuttle to fall into pieces at any moment. Along with thundering engines from the rockets; it increase the tension of each test.

For issues: The movie is too long with the run time hurting the flow. I wasn’t bored or anything, just some scenes felt slow and worn out. Judging from the trailers, I guess there’s a longer cut, because of the scenes that are not in the movie.

The score could’ve been more memorable, in my opinion. I honestly don’t remember it, which is a shame as space films usually have great scores. Again, not bad, just decent.

Overall rating: Not the best Chazelle movie compared to his other work, but still a compelling character study on burying grief, while lost in the stars. Drifting away into that good night. Karen Armstrong, the star child.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
9
twall3Oct 21, 2018
For a man who had little to say, we learn a lot about him from those few words and from what he doesn't say. It seems his quiet intelligence is the temperament that was needed to push through the training exercises, qrieve the losses and makeFor a man who had little to say, we learn a lot about him from those few words and from what he doesn't say. It seems his quiet intelligence is the temperament that was needed to push through the training exercises, qrieve the losses and make the successful moon landing. Inspiring and at times intense. A little surprising how little is shown of the return trip, but I'm guessing director and editor had their reasons. Excellent film making and story telling.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
8
WWEJoker2013Oct 20, 2018
This movie has its flaws, like a really slow first act. But the performances by its main actors plus a really amazing final act make this one of the best movies of the year.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
PanchogulNov 28, 2018
Visualmente atractiva y buena historia, pero terriblemente lenta y la actuación del protagonista es apática a mas no poder, al tipo durante toda la película parece importarle un carajo el mundo entero y pareciera estar trabajando de mala ganaVisualmente atractiva y buena historia, pero terriblemente lenta y la actuación del protagonista es apática a mas no poder, al tipo durante toda la película parece importarle un carajo el mundo entero y pareciera estar trabajando de mala gana con Foy ya que parecen cualquier cosa menos un matrimonio.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
8
IzagoOct 22, 2018
A fotografia do filme, efeitos sonoros o ranger do metal é incrível, trilha sonora muito boa com várias músicas de dar um up em cada cena, a atuação de Ryan foi boa, e a de Claire foi na mesma pegada com cenas de maior impressão, mas o filmeA fotografia do filme, efeitos sonoros o ranger do metal é incrível, trilha sonora muito boa com várias músicas de dar um up em cada cena, a atuação de Ryan foi boa, e a de Claire foi na mesma pegada com cenas de maior impressão, mas o filme é igual um foguete começa de baixo até subir a lua, começa bem normal e vai melhorando bem lentamente. Muito bom o filme e não é o melhor de Damien.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
alejandro970Nov 18, 2018
Narrated with the epoc charactheristics, follows in compelling way how was the daring space travel that could hardly be. Gosling is remarkable as Armstrong; the sequences are realistic, makes the idea you are in the spaceship. A shall to see.
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
8
Creeper3455Nov 2, 2018
“Our movie about Neil Armstrong isn't doing well at the Box Office? Fine,we'll take it from here with Michael Myers” -Some random imbecile at Universal Pictures AKA that one dude who won't know how enthralling First Man is.
But in all“Our movie about Neil Armstrong isn't doing well at the Box Office? Fine,we'll take it from here with Michael Myers” -Some random imbecile at Universal Pictures AKA that one dude who won't know how enthralling First Man is.
But in all seriousness,First Man is destined to have a huge impact on everyone's minds. Also WARNING,I guess: This will be another bias on how IMAX is still the best place to watch a movie...Even if everyone should expect that from now.
So,to start things off,don't worry. for a movie that narrates the events between 1961 and 1969,it doesn't jump from year to year. You'll experience huge time jumps,while at the same time exploring how many tears and oil splatter it took to make this big leap (no pun intended),alongside Ryan Gosling playing Neil Armstrong amsterfully and a Claire Foy who feels pretty stale in emotions throughout,carrying the “seriously worried” look every 24/7.
Also,just like A Quiet Place,sometimes the Sound Effects help carrying the story. Whether it's a BEEP or the sound of an alarm,it still pulls you through. Speaking of sound,man. With every missile engine going and the sound STRONGLY fading away after the moon landing,things won't get any louder than that… Until the next Godzilla movie comes out.
If there’s a thing I can praise the most alongside the story is the Production Design. Nothing great on it,but there always was that feeling of pure classic reality through the movie,followed by grainy 35mm footage that feels like it came out 1 or 2 years after the Moon Landing actually happened….Until the IMAX Footage kicks in,in that case...Well,it’s great as always,but that’s to be expected from IMAX…
For issues and headaches,there was an overuse of Shaky Cam throughout the movie...Not all of it,as the IMAX Sequences were slow and perfectly normal.
And the score by Justin Hurwitz is weird at times. Had Thomas Newman been the composer,I could see his direction,instead of “Oh,I’ll try my best to make that campy 70s space movie feeling with the music”.
But in that case...Hell,this must be tough… This may be the second shortest review I’ve ever done (Revenge is still on top) since everything about it felt great...And seeing it with a friend in IMAX was enthralling. SPOILERS: He loved the hell out of it,and I’m glad he did. Everyone needs to discover these new ways of immersing you into the movie… They’re really worth the $20 or 30. Oh shoot,the movie. First Man is an amazing albeit tension-filled time at the movies,with Ryan Gosling’s calmest role since...Ever?
And hey,for a director who’s all about music...This was a pivotal change of pace!… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
ViniciusBritoOct 20, 2018
During the Cold War, there was the called "Space Race", wich was a race for technological and a symbolic superiority over the Soviet Union, and this race about technology was pretty much all about reaching the space, they started withDuring the Cold War, there was the called "Space Race", wich was a race for technological and a symbolic superiority over the Soviet Union, and this race about technology was pretty much all about reaching the space, they started with satellites and probes, once that the USSR were in front during the beginning of the race, the USA decided to do something very daring, wich is send the man to the Moon for the first time, and one of the astronauts that did it, is the leading character in this movie, wich is Neil Armstrong. Neil Armstrong had a lot of troubles during his paternity and passing through several traumas, and in his professional he was always the most possible hardworking guy, so as the whole NASA, the failures and achieves that happened before the tough round trip to the Moon. Directed by Damien Chazelle and Written by Josh Singer.
While people are telling stories in movies or books, about things that actually happened, mostly of it will surely be true and have a lot of documented materials in it, but still there is a small margin for fiction as well, because you can't tell everything that happened during the course of the events, so in this, they do have friends and family of the true characters and by that they can take the most realistic and possible reaction in the script, i think that they were very successfulyy in this aspect. The story is told in a very calm way, telling a few details with it's time, this is more than anything, a story about the carreer and personal life of Neil Armstrong, seeing this, they did a good job in showing Neil traumas and difficulties inside his family because of what had happened to his daughter, they could show me in the story how much did he was concerned with her, i believed in what i was seeing, and i was caring about all of that, inside of his house and in his personal life, i completely bought every thing that was going on, the up and downs that was very well positioned and justified. During his job in NASA, i think that they did showed very well how hard that was, how many time did it tooked and how many failures they did had before achieving the goal, even that the story is a bit slow, i think that it was very according. They did good in showing how the people were seeing all of that effort, how some of them did not liked how the money was being spent. The interaction between the characters is also worthy to be mentioned here, Neil personality is very intro, while his friends and family was the contrary, so they had a contrast of personalities that gave to the movie another layer. The movie can make me have thoughts, this is surely a story about overcoming as well, how many wrong things have happened to the good emerge, "we have to fail here, to not fail up there", that is just wonderful.
The acting was very nice, Ryan Gosling could offer some very strong moments that could really reach me, moments of anghuis and helplessness, in a way that he couldn't really get anyone, in other moments his smile were so sincere that he did also convinced me of that, or even in other that his eyes got full dark, then i could see how angry or confuse he was, i just think that there are some moments that i couldn't feel much himself, like, when he finally arrives to the moon, he could, just maybe, have had more expressions, but in overall he was really good. Claire Foy did a very good job, mainly in the able of caring to the others, to her husband and primarily to his children, i truly believed in her words, or when she got mad or frustated. Corey Stoll was a bit of a counterpoint, he was very extrovert, so he did nice.
The cinematography of the movie is great, first the camera being positioned in first person during some sequences, that is fantastic because we can go to what the character is seing and possibly feeling in the best possible way, that helped me to immerse in the movie during the most inconvenient moments. Another great thing about it, was in other times, not necessary being in first person, but letting the camera in the capsula where the astronauts were, so we didn't saw the whole rocket, we saw how they were, how suddently everything starts to swing and shake in a tremendous speed and very claustrophobic, they were very happy in this choice, it's great to see at their point. There also camera situations where you see the Earth from the space, The Moon from Earth and the Earth froom Moon, all of them are just deliciously splendid.
The soundtrack is another phenomenal part in here, it not just illustrates the scene, but in some it makes it seems like an full art, when they mix the soundtrack and the cinematography it becomes an art of the most high level, it got beautiful, the sounds are a very classic rythim that worked out a lot in every single moment, it helped to got me hyped, in other moments to get me thoughtful, and in others just the lack of music was also a great moment to implicit something, something that don't needed any sound or track.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
10
whoischarlotteOct 23, 2018
Honestly, one of the best films I’ve ever watched. It was captivating and it was m but kept it real and authentic though the movie. Ryan Gosling’s performance was perfect.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

84 Critic Reviews

7.4 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL