Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation | Release Date: December 12, 2014
4.8
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 401 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
114
Mixed:
158
Negative:
129
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
TheRocksBarneyJan 3, 2015
“Exodus: Gods and Kings” is a perfect representation of its director’s/Ridley Scott’s career. Hit and miss. Although Scott has done well with “Alien” and “Gladiator” in the past, films such as “Robin Hood” or “The Counselor” haven’t. “Exodus:“Exodus: Gods and Kings” is a perfect representation of its director’s/Ridley Scott’s career. Hit and miss. Although Scott has done well with “Alien” and “Gladiator” in the past, films such as “Robin Hood” or “The Counselor” haven’t. “Exodus: Gods and Kings” unfortunately falls into the latter category. But it’s not because of whether it’s poor or not, it’s because it simply just doesn’t earn any more of the stars than I have given it.
How the film does earn the majority of its stars is in its visual effects and cinematography. Ancient Egypt looks real/seemingly historically accurate thanks to this (I can’t confirm whether it is or not as I have no clue about the era) and we can also praise those in charge of costume, makeup, set in regards to this. All of this made me want to go and read up on everything Ancient Egypt.
And it’s not just the landscape that looks great either, the film’s visual effects and cinematography really shine when we see the 10 plagues, or rather the highlight of “Exodus: Gods and Kings”. First comes the river running red with blood, then the frogs, the lice, the flies, the dead livestock, the boils, the hailstorms, the locusts, the darkness and then the death of Egypt’s first born. These each looked incredible and I really do mean that. The films visual effects and cinematography are on par with those in “Interstellar” and therefore the best I’ve seen and experienced since I started reviewing. I really felt like God was having his way.
But this is where things turn sour. The use of that one word. God. Obviously he’s going to make an appearance in the film. And he is portrayed as a kid, played by the British 11 year old Isaac Andrews. Now, I had no idea how they were going to portray God in this film. And I was surprised when this kid ominously appears to Moses (Christian Bale), speaking fluently and suggesting he go free “his people”/the Hebrews. This works initially. But what begins to develop is this really annoying character. And halfway through the film, it seemed even Moses was annoyed at him.
But it is when Aaron Paul (playing Joshua) (yes you read that correctly, and yes he’s terrible, stick to the meth Jesse) when watching Moses talking to God sees him talking to nothing, even though it’s clear that God is there because of the massive hailstorm in the background, that I realised that Scott is perhaps trying to say something here in regards to God. This is a difficult point to explain. Let me start by explaining how Moses never seems like he really is a Hebrew and I don’t recall Moses calling himself a Hebrew at any point in the film. There is no flashbacks to say that Moses is a Hebrew neither. We can only trust what people are saying. Now, for me, this raised a question of doubt in regards to whether God was meant to be seen as real in the film, or as just one of Moses illusions? Let me point out that there is no question as to whether God is real or not in this film. He is meant to be real. Hence the plagues and the sea parting. But to a modern viewer, such as myself, I found myself asking the question as to whether God was real. As to whether in our society we should be praising this petulant kid who wants his way or Moses. I mean, what kind of God would realise 10 plagues like that on anyone? The film poses that question well. So it can be commended for that too.
Now, that’s all that’s good in the film, unfortunately. The rest is poor. Neither Joel Edgerton (playing Rameses) nor Christian Bale save the day. The script is terrible, again not quite living up to its source material.
Yet that is, to be fair, all that “Exodus Gods: and Kings” does poorly. The rest is simply below average. It is not a good film. Films have to earn their stars and “Exodus: Gods and Kings” simply only earns 5.
OUT OF 10. Jeez.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DCEdmondsMar 31, 2015
"Exodus: Gods and Kings" 10 Scale Rating: 5.5 (Decent) ...

The Good: Visually, the film is fantastic. The sets, backgrounds, and effects were top notch. The first half of the film is also well done. Despite already being well versed on the
"Exodus: Gods and Kings" 10 Scale Rating: 5.5 (Decent) ...

The Good: Visually, the film is fantastic. The sets, backgrounds, and effects were top notch. The first half of the film is also well done. Despite already being well versed on the story, I was entertained and very interested in what was going on. While I still don't see him as Moses, Christian Bale wasn't bad. Joel Edgerton, however, stole the show as Ramses. Despite being the main villain of the movie, you couldn't help but feel a little sorry for him. Edgerton played him perfectly and was well balanced as he shifted back and forth from compassionate and remorseful to enraged and murderous.

The Bad: Unfortunately, the film falls apart halfway through. It becomes far less interesting and slows down, which is odd considering that that is the part of the story that is supposed to really take off. While the film starts off with promise, 3/4 of the way through you're just waiting for it to end.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DokaluApr 7, 2015
Ridley Scott's new movie is very much to debate. It is an actual representation of the bible book Exodus, with all the story about Moses. Some things were changed, it was not completely loyal to the book, but that's something to appreciate,Ridley Scott's new movie is very much to debate. It is an actual representation of the bible book Exodus, with all the story about Moses. Some things were changed, it was not completely loyal to the book, but that's something to appreciate, the originality and not being bored by the same story again. I actually think the acting choices were really accurate, mainly Christian Bale as Moses, he was really awesome, and the rest of them, they weren't that much, but still good. The movie itself can get to be a little boring in some parts, it is actually difficult to sit through the whole run time, but that is understandable given the fact that this was trying to recreate the story of Moses as good as possible.
Itself, the film was boring and long, but had some exciting parts and was as loyal as possible to the Bible, without making some parts too predictable.
Real score: 5.6
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
porushhJan 19, 2015
This movie does not compare with the 1956 version of Ten Commandments by Cecil De Mille. The 1956 version inspired the viewer with faith in the power of God. This movie has a lot of computer effects but there is no faith in God, there is noThis movie does not compare with the 1956 version of Ten Commandments by Cecil De Mille. The 1956 version inspired the viewer with faith in the power of God. This movie has a lot of computer effects but there is no faith in God, there is no soul in this movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
mrhonthyJan 21, 2015
Ridley Scott has created epic theater and cinematic adventures with Aliens, Prometheus, Thelma and Louise, and the award winning Gladiator, just to name a few, yet he fails with Exodus: Gods and Kings. Walking into the theater, you wouldRidley Scott has created epic theater and cinematic adventures with Aliens, Prometheus, Thelma and Louise, and the award winning Gladiator, just to name a few, yet he fails with Exodus: Gods and Kings. Walking into the theater, you would expect to just sit through another retelling of the bible story. Instead you experience it as if you were there yourself. But to experience it once is enough.
Exodus: Gods and Kings has been criticized throughout the world, before even being shown in theaters, because Scott has cast white actors in the lead roles while many of the slaves were portrayed otherwise. But not casting recognizable box office stars could have been disastrous. The cast is full of highly known stars such as Christian Bale, Joel Edgerton, Ben Kingsley, Aaron Paul, and John Turturro.
The movie begins with Moses (Bale, The Dark Knight Trilogy) and Ramses (Edgerton, Zero Dark Thirty) as full grown men seated with Ramses’ father, Seti (Turturro, The Big Lebowski). Moses and Ramses were raised as close as brothers without being blood related and are reminded to have each other’s backs in any sorts of trouble.
As we are led into the first big scene with the two brothers going into battle together, we catch a glimpse of Ramses’ animosity towards Moses. He resents the fact that Moses is a king on the battlefield and is aware that Seti favors his sibling. But shortly after, Ramses takes the throne. Ramses hears a rumor that Moses was born a Hebrew and, not having the guts to kill him, has Moses banished from his kingdom.
Bale plays Moses as a honorable family man trying to do what is right. He has the heart of a warrior and the patience of a father. Moses is a man who grew up thinking he was Egyptian, later learning and embracing his true identity as one chosen by God. And in Exodus:Gods and Kings, God is portrayed by a young boy. Every moment that 11-year-old actor came on the screen, he stole the scene.
The movie takes off from there and we are presented with astonishing shots varying from Ramses’ kingdom, the Egyptian effigies we see in historic photos, and the beautiful Red Sea. But what took my breathe away was the incredible depiction of the deadly plagues. It is hard to believe that Scott actually did not use 20,000 frogs or 100,000 locusts in those realistic and skin-crawling scenes.
But with great build up with the plagues, you are presented with a poor CGI tidal wave that comes charging at the soldiers and slaves as they cross the Red Sea. What was supposed to be the climax of the film, turned out to be the disappointment. The film does not thoroughly explain Moses’ past, or basics for the Ten Commandments. Moses was a monumental figure in biblical history, to fully understand Exodus: Gods and Kings, you must go into the movie knowing the bible stories which, in the end, may not work out well for other audience members.
While the movie had spectacular scenes from tornados to a bloody river, it did not have the full back story to support. Sadly, Exodus: Gods and Kings did not live up to the hype and did not exceed my expectations.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
KingCassius13Jan 26, 2015
It's a decent movie. No it doesn't exactly follow the bible. But im an atheist so I could really care less about that. I honestly just didn't think the film was all that entertaining.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
NRNSWApr 4, 2015
Fair warning - this review relates to the filmmaking and story telling, it does not take into consideration references to the bible. As a movie unto itself, it isn' too bad. Some of the graphics / footage leaves a bit to leave desiredFair warning - this review relates to the filmmaking and story telling, it does not take into consideration references to the bible. As a movie unto itself, it isn' too bad. Some of the graphics / footage leaves a bit to leave desired (especially the swarm of locusts, and then there are the awful crocodiles that looked so fake - I couldn't remember if I was watching Exodus or some version of Sharknado). Scott does get the story he wants to tell across to the audience member - it is just a lot lower standard than his other movies. I wouldn't rush out to see it if I was you.... Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Armin_AbbasiMar 14, 2015
The 2 ½ hour film does its best to tell the whole story of the Exodus properly which, finally, fails to fulfill it. It would be a better idea to focus on just one aspect of the phenomena or cover a smaller part of it. Scott lost the favor ofThe 2 ½ hour film does its best to tell the whole story of the Exodus properly which, finally, fails to fulfill it. It would be a better idea to focus on just one aspect of the phenomena or cover a smaller part of it. Scott lost the favor of audience by telling a crucial story inaccurately and disappointed the critics by wrapping up a great story. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
MattBrady99Mar 10, 2015
Oh Ridley Scott why?. Why do you always keep doing this. I know you're a great director, you proved that back in your gold age of films, but now you make such forgettable and mostly terrible films like: Hannibal, Robin Hood, The Counselor andOh Ridley Scott why?. Why do you always keep doing this. I know you're a great director, you proved that back in your gold age of films, but now you make such forgettable and mostly terrible films like: Hannibal, Robin Hood, The Counselor and now this.

The story is about a Moses as he rises up against the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses, setting 600,000 slaves on a monumental journey of escape from Egypt and its terrifying cycle of deadly plagues.

Judging by the trailers of this film I was pretty excited for the movie, because it looks exciting, epic and looks like a lot of fun.
Until I sawed the reviews for the film and on RT it had 2.8% and on Metacritic it had about 5.2% and let me just I was really disappointed from hearing that, I thought Ridley Scott finally got his mo jo back but really he hasn't.

RANT Time: Once I sawed a article about people complain about the none Egyptian actors playing famous Egyptian as known today, and the director himself has come out and said that he can't work with actors from different county's like Egyptian, because it's to hard work and he doesn't get a long with them. Hearing that I give up on Ridley on this, you can't work with people that are from different country's? I'm sorry but are you not the man who bough us Alien, Gladiator and Blade Runner. Dude your know has the master of directing and you can't work with people from different country's because "It's to hard work", well judging on Alien and Blade Runner which looked really hard to do and probably took a long time to finish. That's easy to you but you don't want to work with people from different country's, F**K you Ridley, but I still love you other movies.

Anywhere I still kept a open mind going into this movie, even with the news like that which really bothered me but still maybe the actors might pull it off, and let me just say after viewing the film it's not as bad as the critics are describing it to be, but it's really disappointing.

Christian Bale did okay as Moses as Mr. Bale can nail every role his in, but this one is may not incredible but he didn't do a bad job. Joel Edgerton did okay as well. That might sound really uninspiring and not very creative words to use for these two performance, but as I said their performances wasn't incredible or anything special, so yeah I'm sticking to it's okay.

The visual effect's were pretty good and the red sea part I have to say was pretty well done. The directing by Ridley once again was pretty damn good, even when I'm not that happy with him for making such a poor decision, he still mangers to win me over.

Now for the big problems: The story of Moses and the red sea had to be the most interesting and the most imaginative story I've ever seen, but in this movie it gets over shadowed by the action scenes and to don't get me wrong the action sense were pretty bad-ass, but don't forget you're telling a classic story of Moses. Sigourney Weaver was wasted in this movie and that's just sad to see that, has she is a freaking damn great actress being in roles that just put her talent to waste. Aaron Paul as well was wasted in this movie just like Weaver.

Exodus: Gods and Kings has to be the most blandest and the most disappointing movie of this year and I really wanted this movie to be good, but it just turned out to be a disappointment from a director who use to have his spot light.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
HalleluyahMattMar 18, 2015
Though there are some masterful visuals and decent acting on the part of Bale, the rest of the movie last depth, passion, and a well chosen cast. Besides this, Scott needlessly deviates from the Scriptural account. Moses' encounter withThough there are some masterful visuals and decent acting on the part of Bale, the rest of the movie last depth, passion, and a well chosen cast. Besides this, Scott needlessly deviates from the Scriptural account. Moses' encounter with Pharaoh, for example, are limited and lack the tension present in the biblical narrative. Scott's choice to depict God as a petulant child is a nasty jab at Christians and Jews as well as poorly a chosen narrative feature; at the same time it both weakens the film and makes for some gross blasphemy Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LukesikwebuMar 21, 2015
Best watched as a stand-alone Hollywood epic. Ridley Scott deviates substantially from the Biblical story of Moses. Here- Moses has no staff, he's a God-sceptic, he doesn't split the waters, and there's no pillar of fire.
Exodus is a loooong
Best watched as a stand-alone Hollywood epic. Ridley Scott deviates substantially from the Biblical story of Moses. Here- Moses has no staff, he's a God-sceptic, he doesn't split the waters, and there's no pillar of fire.
Exodus is a loooong yet entertaining epic, with some biblical references.
The cinematography, coupled with Christian Bale's performance is fantastic.
It's worth a try.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MovieMadHawkJun 13, 2015
ok overall movie was entertaining but as a biblical rendition of moses i say it hit some key points but it did not hit everything it needed. if you are going to do an interpretation of a story that is writen centurys ago do it right makeok overall movie was entertaining but as a biblical rendition of moses i say it hit some key points but it did not hit everything it needed. if you are going to do an interpretation of a story that is writen centurys ago do it right make parts to it no matter what religon you are. i give it a five out of ten foe the effort and i would like to see a ten commandments movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SolInvictaApr 3, 2016
Visually stunning - maybe the best storm graphics I've seen in a movie - and the story sporadically hits, but Exodus is largely a hollow affair. The two leads carry it the best they can.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
Moo-viesDec 30, 2016
Whoever did the casting needs to be barred from ever having to do such choices again.
Though it probably was a very deliberate production choice.

The actors who accepted to play in this joke lost pretty much all their credit in the process.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
TinoTrivinoJan 4, 2016
Its not the Story which is bad and not true according to the history, its just.. that they use actors, really well known actors, that the begining of the movie seems to be a comedy... common, really? what is that!!!
but what is also a bit
Its not the Story which is bad and not true according to the history, its just.. that they use actors, really well known actors, that the begining of the movie seems to be a comedy... common, really? what is that!!!
but what is also a bit freightend is the zionist undertone, and i say zionist not jewish, complet different things for me.
Really Mister Scott, At least you could use actors which no one knows, and without british accent :p
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
EpicLadySpongeFeb 21, 2016
Exodus: Weaks and Fails. Usually, it doesn't get any worse than how I see it when it should've been better before we all doubt that it could've been worse.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
nanatrinityMar 14, 2016
This movie lacks 99% of Biblical facts and I wonder why they went on ahead producing it . the director should really be ashamed of himself. I'm really sorry that my favorite actors like Christian Bale and Ben Kingsley had to play part in it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
Avalon011May 29, 2016
I've seen many incarnations of the Moses story, Exodus is just weak. Exodus is very sluggish at times the story comes to a pause with some long and boring scenes that serve no purpose, and a lot of inaccuracies Moses never got married and hadI've seen many incarnations of the Moses story, Exodus is just weak. Exodus is very sluggish at times the story comes to a pause with some long and boring scenes that serve no purpose, and a lot of inaccuracies Moses never got married and had children. And overall just weak scenes, the scene with the burning bush and "god" comes to speak to him Moses has never heard of God at this point and he asks the child "Who are you?" child God answers "I am" then the scene closes, how does "I am" explain to Moses who God is? Then afterwards Moses magically knows everything about God, to anyone that's never heard of God "I am" is far from helpful. Now another useless God scene with the child comes along again, why are they screaming at each other for no reason? Very useless dialog then the scene closes, then the movie jumps to the painting of the blood on the doorways, how did Moses receive these instructions when child God never told him to do it?

This movie is filled with many more inaccuracies and I was just confused most of the time, a lot of this movie doesn't even make any sense.

The most random moment was when Moses was walking back to his horse after meeting with Ben Kingsley then two men shout "Look a slave!" at Moses then attack him, then Moses kills them then goes back to his horse like nothing ever happened, Moses is still a general at the time. And why is Moses slaughtering everyone? He never killed anyone after he fled.

A very weak and confusing movie.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
FilmClubMar 27, 2016
Ridley Scott's rendering of the Book of Exodus serves up most of the spectacular highlights of the biblical tale.

2014 marks the resurgence of the Old Testament at the movies. After Darren Aronofsky turned to Genesis to unleash Noah,
Ridley Scott's rendering of the Book of Exodus serves up most of the spectacular highlights of the biblical tale.

2014 marks the resurgence of the Old Testament at the movies. After Darren Aronofsky turned to Genesis to unleash Noah, Ridley Scott moves forward to the Book of Exodus to revisit the story of Moses. Exodus: Gods and Kings is this century’s answer to Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments, but it already looks to be more controversial than that pious 1956 opus. Spectacularly filmed and intermittently well acted, though not quite as much campy fun as the DeMille version, the picture looks likely to attract a substantial audience even if some religious leaders voice protests.

Scott did a great job reviving the Roman sword-and-sandals epic when he made the Oscar-winning Gladiator. This Egyptian saga is not quite in the same league, but it confirms the director’s flair for widescreen imagery. Exodus has the added kick of 3D technology, and it has enough eye-popping set pieces to please adventure fans.

Unlike the DeMille rendering, this one does not begin at the beginning but plunges us into the middle of the action, with Moses (Christian Bale) as an adult in the royal court. We eventually learn the backstory of how the Jewish child managed to find a home among the kings, but we’re introduced to him as a warrior and best friend of Ramses (Joel Edgerton). The first part of the movie cribs rather shamelessly from Gladiator, which began by sketching the rivalry between the emperor’s son and his favorite warrior. Here the aging Pharaoh, played by John Turturro, prefers his adopted son Moses to his own son Ramses. This tortured family drama was performed much more persuasively in Gladiator by Russell Crowe, Joaquin Phoenix and Richard Harris. Despite an excess of mascara, Turturro is sympathetic, but he doesn’t fit all that comfortably into ancient Egypt.

An early battle scene against the Hittites, modeled very closely on the climactic battle scene between Arabs and Turks in Lawrence of Arabia, suggests that Moses is the superior warrior, which prepares for his eventual banishment once Ramses succeeds his father on the throne. But the friendship between the two soldiers is not well established in the opening scenes, so the film stumbles out of the gate. Four writers — Adam Cooper, Bill Collage, Jeffrey Caine and Oscar winner Steven Zaillian — are credited with the screenplay, and they haven’t been able to craft an elegant narrative from the biblical text. The dialogue is often cringe-worthy, as when a surly Moses tells God, “Nice of you to come.”

When Moses learns his true identity, he is reluctant to play the role of savior, and he finds a comfortable home in a remote village, where he marries and has a son. But his destiny calls when he comes upon the famous burning bush and is approached by God to lead his people out of slavery. Here is the film’s most controversial choice, for God appears to Moses as a fierce child. Although this may offend some devout viewers, it’s actually far more interesting than the booming offscreen voice that DeMille used in his version of the story. This divine child seems angry and vengeful rather than a benign Buddha figure, but one could argue that this is in keeping with the Old Testament God of wrath.

The film hits its peak in the sequence recounting the 10 plagues. The savage crocodiles were not in the Old Testament, but as they attack humans as well as fish, they turn the Nile blood red, which is at least an ingenious explanation of how the river might have turned to blood. Frogs, boils and locusts are truer to the text and are rendered in luscious visual detail.

The climactic chase to the Red Sea is equally spectacular. Although The Ten Commandments won the Oscar for its visual effects, the parting of the Red Sea in DeMille’s film was laughably tacky. Scott comes up with a somewhat more credible portrayal of how the Israelites managed to cross the sea before a monumental storm drowned the Egyptians. This sequence is visually thrilling. The movie should have ended there, but Scott and the writers seem to have felt obliged to include a few of the later parts of the story, including the delivery of the Ten Commandments and a scene of an aged Moses finally arriving near the land of Canaan. But while these events are integral to the biblical story, they come off here as the worst kind of anticlimax.

Don’t expect any acting nominations for the picture. Bale garbles a few too many of his lines, but he has an imposing physical presence.

No movie with such a limp ending can be fully satisfying, and the beginning also falters. But the long middle section is a rousing good show.

Ridley Scott shows off his gifts as director, but the script and some of the actors let him down.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
actiniumJun 29, 2021
/ /
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DominArsenDec 8, 2018
Exodus
Un film réalisé par Ridley Scott (Gladiator
Commençons par les choses qui fâchent :( Un casting spécial. Un des Pharaons a déjà incarné un rôle ou il se fait uriner dessus par un transformeurs et/ou il passe du temps à rire. Incarné un
Exodus
Un film réalisé par Ridley Scott (Gladiator
Commençons par les choses qui fâchent :(
Un casting spécial. Un des Pharaons a déjà incarné un rôle ou il se fait uriner dessus par un transformeurs et/ou il passe du temps à rire. Incarné un Pharaon ne lui va pas du tout.... Le plus dramatique dans ce film c'est qu'il n'est pas dramatique. La gestion de l'IMPACT des différentes catastrophes est catastrophique. Seulement la dernière catastrophe est bien amener, mais pour autres, les catastrophes se passe, on voit clairement les conséquences, mais que très peux le moment "avant la catastrophe". Bref je trouve ce film un peu vide.
Une 3D qui met très peu en avant la 3D c'est dommage
Les belles choses :)
Le film est très bien réalisé les angles de vue sont majestueux les villes sublimes et l’immensité égyptienne somptueusement retranscrite, j'imagine.
Les catastrophes qui sont terribles, mais seulement à l'image.
Les musiques ne sont perçues que dans les moments intimes. Peux être un peut plus sinon elle reste bonne.
Conclusion: étant donné que c'est un film qui est très tourné ver "la Fois" je peux déterminer qu'il ne plaira pas à tout le monde surtout dans les conditions actuelles...
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews