Read Positive User Reviews for Exodus: Gods and Kings

10

SchroederRockDec 12, 2014

Usually I give fair reviews, but since people are tanking the scores because it doesn't follow a Biblical story properly, I'm giving it a 10. As a Christian, I want to spite all the other Christians that forget that Hollywood is Hollywood,Usually I give fair reviews, but since people are tanking the scores because it doesn't follow a Biblical story properly, I'm giving it a 10. As a Christian, I want to spite all the other Christians that forget that Hollywood is Hollywood, and that Ridley Scott only does epic death and not much else. The only surprise here is that Russell Crowe wasn't tapped for the lead role. I'm rooting for this movie to tear it up this season, if for no other reason than to piss off the close-minded r-tards that can't take a joke and forbid a little dancing. Cheers!… Expand

22 of 47 users found this helpful2225

All this user's reviews

9

theofficeDec 13, 2014

Yet again another divisive movie based on the Bible. Just so you guys know I am Catholic and take faith seriously. And personally I found the movie to be very good. Yes, the director does take some artistic leeway in terms of how some scenesYet again another divisive movie based on the Bible. Just so you guys know I am Catholic and take faith seriously. And personally I found the movie to be very good. Yes, the director does take some artistic leeway in terms of how some scenes play out but honestly taken as a whole it has all the major parts and main points there. I do think the director wanted to walk a fine line to try and get his atheist/hollywood audience to buy it but there isn't much discussion about God being real within the context of the movie as (spoiler alert lol) the Red Sea parts. So it is definitely clear that God is there. Is it exactly like the old movies? No. It is a really good movie worth seeing and faithful to the Bible? Yes. I will say I was glad that at least Moses said "God" unlike Noah who only said "the Creator". If you are a hardcore literal interpretation of the Bible type person then you won't like it. But I think the vast majority of people including those of faith will.… Expand

7 of 17 users found this helpful710

All this user's reviews

8

AGarcia732Dec 20, 2014

First of all, I’m Christian. Nevertheless, simply because Exodus: Gods & Kings strays a bit from the Biblical account doesn’t mean I’m going to dismiss it. Us religious people shouldn’t be so seemingly harsh on E:G&K, because it kind ofFirst of all, I’m Christian. Nevertheless, simply because Exodus: Gods & Kings strays a bit from the Biblical account doesn’t mean I’m going to dismiss it. Us religious people shouldn’t be so seemingly harsh on E:G&K, because it kind of paints us in a bad light. (Ex: religious fanatics can’t tolerate the slightest bit of change!) Now, because so many hate on the film due to its differences with the Bible, I’m going to discuss what’s different.

Early on in E:G&K, Moses is depicted as an experienced warrior with a sword. He later displays conflicted feelings, argues with God, and questions the severity of the plagues God inflicts on Egypt. Unlike the Bible, in E:G&K, Moses isn’t slow of speech and slow of tongue and doesn’t have his brother Aaron as his spokesperson. Unlike the movie, Moses is portrayed in the Bible as a “a quiet but firm shepherd--one who delivered his people from slavery with a staff and God’s plagues, not an Egyptian sword.” In the movie, Moses and his generals (who lead their own makeshift army) at one point prepare to hold-off the first wave of Pharaoh’s army. But Moses never created a Hebrew fighting force to combat the Egyptians.**E:G&K also shows its antagonist, Ramses, in a positive and humane light. (It should be noted that the ruling Pharaoh during the time of Exodus is never named in the Scriptures.) He is shown to refuse letting the Israelites go partly because he “doesn’t believe that Egypt could survive the loss of its primary labor force”—the enslaved Israelites. E:G&K shows “the challenges of Ramses’ predicament: the Egyptian gods were not responding–while the Hebrew god was terrorizing the Egyptian people with one terrifying and deadly plague after another.” He was probably torn and conflicted over what he should do. Later, Ramses doesn’t decide to chase after the Israelites and Moses until after his dead baby (killed by God in the final plague) is being mummified and placed in its coffin.**In E:G&K, God leaves Moses on his own; he lets Moses make most of the decisions, and he doesn’t offer much in the way of advice and guidance. In the Scriptures, Moses is instructed by God what to do, and he and Aaron actively are a part of the Plagues (sometimes beginning them). In the Bible, the 10 Plagues are shown as separate, God-derived events but in the movie they are shown to be connected to each other in a series of (slightly improbable, yet supposedly more ‘realistic’) events with a cause-and-effect relationship. When Moses and the Hebrews arrive at a seemingly dead end (trapped between Ramses’ army and the Red Sea), Moses throws his sword in the sea in anger and frustration-and the water then begins to recede because of this. The Israelites are afraid but show faith and follow Moses. Moses and Pharaoh both never are assaulted by a big wave in the climax of the parting of the Red Sea, only for both to survive. Moses leaves Egypt unscathed, and the Pharaoh dies by drowning.

Despite these changes, I don’t believe that this is some deeply offensive Hollywood abomination--it’s just a movie adaptation of a novel. And with most adaptations, changes are made to help the movie become a smoother (more slick and streamlined) cinematic tale. “Viewers at extreme ends of the audience (those hoping for a close adaptation or a drastic reimagining) may find that Scott has either taken too many or not enough liberties with the events of Exodus.” Me? If he was going to adapt it, I wouldn’t want something exactly the same as something I’ve already read. I’d want some new material that is within the spirit of the text source. I’d want changes made that make things a little different and interesting, yet nothing that completely changes the whole theme/idea of the text. The movie has nice CGI, and the scenery/costumes are great. I personally think they could’ve cast more people who weren’t white and still get the movie financed. (Scott said it would’ve been impossible to make the film with mostly black actors and get the film financed, but I think that’s BS.) Despite it’s long run time, almost all the characters in the film are somewhat one-dimensional. The actors do fine but high-profile acting talent is wasted, and G&K’s biggest problem is that there isn’t enough character development. The fact that Moses and Ramses grew up as brothers yet turn on each other so quickly isn’t believable. The 2nd biggest problem is that E: G&K is way too dark, moody, and gory/violent all the time--for what should be an awe-inspiring tale of hope. Yet, I like that Scott depicted the events of Exodus in a cynical, realistic way as he tried to get viewers to challenge their perceptions of the events of Exodus. E:G&K’s “storyline is mostly in step with the fundamental message and themes of the Hebrew scriptures–but placing added emphasis on Moses’ personal doubts and the horror of God’s violent crusade to punish the Egyptians. E: G&K is a tale of relatable faith in a world where things aren’t black and white.”… Expand

4 of 12 users found this helpful48

All this user's reviews

7

Compi24Jan 3, 2015

Underdeveloped plot threads and overstayed welcome aside, "Exodus: Gods And Kings" nevertheless entertains with its sweeping scale and relatively admirable stab at the epic tale of Moses and the Israelites.

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

8

KermitLaphroaigDec 12, 2014

Exodus is a grand and complex new interpretation of the story of the Hebrews and their exodus from Egypt by legendary director Ridley Scott, known for films such as 'Alien' (1979), 'Blade Runner' (1982), 'Gladiator' (2000), 'Black Hawk Down'Exodus is a grand and complex new interpretation of the story of the Hebrews and their exodus from Egypt by legendary director Ridley Scott, known for films such as 'Alien' (1979), 'Blade Runner' (1982), 'Gladiator' (2000), 'Black Hawk Down' (2001) and 'Prometheus' (2012). The film stars Christian Bale as Moses and Joel Edgerton as Ramesses.

'Exodus' breaks new ground in its depiction of epic landscapes and the glory of architecture. Ancient Egypt is reconstructed before our eyes with vast CGI vistas of pyramids and temples populated by thousands of ant-like workers. The audience truly has God's view of this panoply, looking down from above at one of the world's mightiest and most ancient civilizations. Likewise, we are given breathtaking views of mountains and the desert landscapes of Egypt as Moses wanders, first as a outcast, then as a leader of his people into the unknown wilderness. Special attention is given to the sea floor of the Red Sea as special effects wizardry reveals what lies beneath the waves as God rolls back the tides for the Hebrews.

The drama of the epic is centered around the two personalities of Moses, the adopted Egyptian prince and his natural-born brother Ramesses, the incipient Pharaoh. Bale turns in a dedicated and focused portrayal of a reluctant messiah induced by God, in the persona of a 7-year-old boy, to lead his people out of slavery. I found Joel Edgerton's Ramesses to be much more interesting. He interprets the young pharaoh as a brash, bullying, but shrewd man, born to the purple. His performance hearkens back to that of Joaquin Phoenix's Commodus in 'Gladiator', and exceeds it in power and depth. Edgerton projects a sort of visceral sense of entitlement that brings the pharaoh to life. John Turturro plays referee to two princes as the wise elder pharaoh, Seti.

The main weakness of the film is that the lack of action makes the two-and-a-half hour running time seem very drawn out. Part of the problem is the faithfulness to the long biblical narrative, and the other part is weak-willed editing. For example, there is a long sequence in which Moses wanders in the wilderness, encounters a bedouin community, marries a woman and has a child, all of which could have been safely omitted from the film. Moses' interactions with the ghetto-like Hebrew slave community in Memphis is also written and edited in a somewhat ham-handed manner, leaving actor Ben Kingsley, playing a Hebrew elder, with the raw end of the script.

The costumes and scenery of the film are a high point that set a new standard for depiction of the ancient world, going far beyond even Gladiator in their detail and authenticity. The razor-sharp cinematography and moody lighting combine to give the film a fine-art feel, like a Ruisdael painting come to life.

Overall, 'Exodus' is a rich and complex film that provides a valuable new re-telling of the Hebrew mythos.… Expand

6 of 22 users found this helpful616

All this user's reviews

10

appreciateDec 13, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I think it was great and technologically advanced in the making any person that can bring in the open the wonderful stories of the bible is great. It's better then some of the evil garbage in the movies today that fill r youth with horrible thoughts but I found it to b a little off from scripture but again it's great to see stories from our true history come alive even if they r a little off people can be drawn to read the true story themselves everyone should see and support good quality movies… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

10

MarkT2014Dec 26, 2014

Ridley Scott basically took the fairy tale and gave it a touch of realism. No wonder religious majority hates it. It showed that movie critique in general is subjective as I always argued. They're not criticizing the movie, but the AtheisticRidley Scott basically took the fairy tale and gave it a touch of realism. No wonder religious majority hates it. It showed that movie critique in general is subjective as I always argued. They're not criticizing the movie, but the Atheistic approach and this is why 4.4 is not really the score of the actually movie here.

On the other hand, the fact that the film topped the box office during its opening weekend with $24.5 million shows that mass opinion of religious zealots is completely irrelevant. The more they hate something, the better it actually is. And boy, it definitely is. The film is MAGNIFICENT!

This is why I love Ridley Scott. He doesn't let public opinion influence his work.

The film is probably the most realistic portrayal of bible event I've seen so far. People argue that it should have stayed literally true to the bible. But how can you stay literally true to something that's not even true to itself? Our bible is completely different to the original bible. It was changed and revised countless of times through centuries.

Events that happened in Bible are described as god's deeds only because people couldn't explain them in any other way at the time. Just as cavemen before them thought the stars were small spirits floating above. That doesn't mean we should turn the stars into divine fairies when filming the stone age today.

I give this film clean 10 to balance the bias. Else I would give it 8. Definitely worth watching.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

7

Le__XenomorphDec 15, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie starts trying to explain the strong brotherhood between Moses and Ramesses. It somewhat succeeds because it only shows one scene when their father is saying keep eachother safe, always. I never felt that bond between Moses and Ramesses because they only liked eachother for one small scene and hated eachother for the rest of the movie. But when they form a rivalry, it turns into a strong hatred and that part is awesome. Especially the "battle scene" at the end when Moses "parts" the Red Sea and the huge wave engulfs the entire Egyptian army and somehow by some magical coincidence, Ramesses survives. Perhaps god spared him so he could feel guilty? Also, the movie has a ton of pacing issues! The beginning drags on and on and the end drags as well. The middle sequence is the best because their is a smooth transition between events. The part that drags the most is when Moses forms a family. I did not care about his wife and his child and I actually wanted them to die so the movie can move on. But, eventually it did and the 1 hr segment in the middle is awesome. It shows the conflicts in egypt as Ramesses becomes power hungry and tries to find Moses who is hiding in Egypt, training his small army so he can free the hebrew slaves and again, the big battle in the end and the awesome battle scene at the beginning of the movie. All in all, Exodus is a good film but has a lot of pacing issues and lacks some character development. Exodus gets a 7/10 (good).… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

7

demolisher7778Dec 12, 2014

The beginning of this movie was boring.... I mean PAINFULLY boring. But as the movie progressed it picked up the pace and had some pretty awesome sequences. It is just too bad that it was too long and dragged on and made me want it to end.The beginning of this movie was boring.... I mean PAINFULLY boring. But as the movie progressed it picked up the pace and had some pretty awesome sequences. It is just too bad that it was too long and dragged on and made me want it to end. But all in all, Exodus is a good movie. It just could have been much more.… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

10

DarthPreampDec 25, 2014

A great movie. VERY respectful of the source material. And yet I feel this is Ridley Scott's commentary, if you will, on the material. And what a truly fascinating commentary it is! As a somewhat well versed Jewish/Hebraic scholar, I foundA great movie. VERY respectful of the source material. And yet I feel this is Ridley Scott's commentary, if you will, on the material. And what a truly fascinating commentary it is! As a somewhat well versed Jewish/Hebraic scholar, I found his take quite interesting. And I recognized some of the material he was drawing on; not the least of which was a very well researched analysis of the meaning of the original Hebrew text and the words it is comprised of. As I watched and a scene would come up, I instantly knew which verse he was analyzing and giving commentary on! Simply amazing that he has that sort of clarity in a film!! He also did NOT give in to Hollywood pressures with this film. It is NOT politically correct. He doesn't have an obligatory sex scene. And he takes extremely seriously the social, religious, spiritual and historical implications of the Exodus of the Jews from Egypt.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

7

TheQuietGamerApr 16, 2015

Ridley Scott gives this telling of the Biblical tale a vibe similar to some of the classic swords & sandals epics that have graced the big screen. It is a lengthy movie. As a result it rushes through some areas it shouldn't have and stays tooRidley Scott gives this telling of the Biblical tale a vibe similar to some of the classic swords & sandals epics that have graced the big screen. It is a lengthy movie. As a result it rushes through some areas it shouldn't have and stays too long in others. It can be a rather mixed affair, but overall it is a solidly entertaining movie. One that is sure to offend many due to the fact that it is based on a religious belief.

As you might expect it's not entirely Biblically accurate. It certainly does a better job "Noah" did at sticking close to what the Bible says, but Biblical and historical inaccuracies are to be found. For one it tries too hard to add human reasoning in order to explain the various miracles and plagues God brings on.

What we get here is a flawed movie, but one that can still be enjoyable provided people put down their religion or anti-religion related baggage. It can be epic one minute and somewhat boring the next. Yet even in it's slower drawn out moments I still found myself interested in the film. Despite some awkward and underdeveloped plot elements this is a very solid attempt at bringing the story of Moses to the big-screen. It might not get all of the facts right or be all that flawless in execution, but Ridley Scott still has enough good things going on here to make it worth a watch.

I give "Exodus: gods and Kings" a 7.5/10.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

WalkingDead5640Feb 8, 2015

Ambitious and epic, Exodus: Gods and Kings has an amazing cast and charming and realistic performances from Bale and Edgerton. It's a delightful welcome surprise from Ridley Scott. It's a visual masterpiece. Stunning and shot beautifully fromAmbitious and epic, Exodus: Gods and Kings has an amazing cast and charming and realistic performances from Bale and Edgerton. It's a delightful welcome surprise from Ridley Scott. It's a visual masterpiece. Stunning and shot beautifully from magnificent landscapes and architectures to epic, thrilling and brutal action scenes to enormous tidal waves and horrific storms. It doesn't fail to disappoint as it concludes with a quality, horrific and awesome third act. It boasts Scott's skill for creating massive and expensive, enjoyable epics like this! It's definitely a great theatre experience and I highly recommend giving this movie a try, even if some believe it's far too long but the movie picks up pace as it goes along. 8/10!… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

7

TracingyouripJan 22, 2015

How'd I know the reviews for this movie would be a religious **** I'm going to put all my religious biases aside and try not take offense from the Biblical and historical mishaps on the directors behalf. The acting was great, the CGI lookedHow'd I know the reviews for this movie would be a religious **** I'm going to put all my religious biases aside and try not take offense from the Biblical and historical mishaps on the directors behalf. The acting was great, the CGI looked incredible. Stretching 2 and a half hours long I questioned if I would get bored or distracted as I do with most long movies. This sadly was the base briefly. This was a solid movie. However nothing blew me out the water, asides from the CGI. Which should be expected with a $140 million dollar budget.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

BigMike71May 10, 2015

When I heard about this movie I thought "oh boy, another rip off version of a Bible story". To my surprise I was wrong. It showed the cinema side of a classic childhood story. People say that this movie is terrible, I disagree.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

LeZeeApr 3, 2015

This is a well known story and I have also seen the '56 movie 'The Ten Commandments'. So in this film could not foresee the modification, but it did in a slight manner like the later 'Noah' movie. The best part was the visuals, the graphicsThis is a well known story and I have also seen the '56 movie 'The Ten Commandments'. So in this film could not foresee the modification, but it did in a slight manner like the later 'Noah' movie. The best part was the visuals, the graphics were so good, hard to resist the pleasure if you are vfx geek like me. That's the reason I love modern movie, especially remake of a classic like 'King Kong'. The problem in this flick was lie in the story telling.

As we know, Ridley Scott is an excellent narrator, but this movie was too short even though it ran 150 minutes. I felt it was just a brief, I mean there were no details or depth in the important scenes. You will know what I'm saying if you had watched '56 movie I mentioned in a above paragraph. That's drawback for the first timers at a same time advantage for not to fall in boredom for those who have already seen other versions. Christian Bale, awesome; Joel Edgerton, good; Ben Kingsley, never required; Aaron Paul, totally waste.

Overall, not cleverly stablised in the scenes that are very important, especially the final one about ten commandments should have been extended a little bit with a moral message. If it was a Peter Jackson movie, definitely it would have been a trilogy with an aggregated time of over 500 minutes. This movie was an entertainer like I enjoyed it than the message deliverer. Must be watched for the amusement and for the pleasure in updating technical aspect of the narration rather than inspiration.

7.5/10… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

10

kinoralphJan 21, 2015

Great film. Don't care if they are all white. This is Hollywood. The location, scenarios, special effect were a complete delight. Transforming moses in a real men......amazing. Transforming God in a bully kid.......PERFECT.

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

7

AxeTJan 9, 2015

Unfairly treated for some stupid reason (Could it be that it's Biblical based?), this is as Epic as it gets with giant sets and sprawling vistas and huge stunning disaster visuals excellently depicted. The 3-D is the best in a movie I'veUnfairly treated for some stupid reason (Could it be that it's Biblical based?), this is as Epic as it gets with giant sets and sprawling vistas and huge stunning disaster visuals excellently depicted. The 3-D is the best in a movie I've seen in a while. And of course Christian Bale is good. SOLIDLY made by a master director.
So what did the jackass critics and morons on here who panned it expect?… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

10

ledaumasDec 20, 2014

I wish the movie had a lot more special effects. It's the only reason I went to see it as the story about a guy who promises to send his people to the promised land, and then they end up in a dessert for 40 years, is a lousy story. But likeI wish the movie had a lot more special effects. It's the only reason I went to see it as the story about a guy who promises to send his people to the promised land, and then they end up in a dessert for 40 years, is a lousy story. But like another reviewer, I'm giving the movie a 10 instead of a 7 (for the story telling and the effects) to make up for people who can't review a movie for its merits, and instead complain about a story that everyone knows how it ends.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

8

duncan1964Jun 29, 2015

An English teacher leads a double life as a gambler. When he owes big, he borrows from a gangster and offers his own life as collateral, immersing himself in an illicit underground world that could cost him his life. Wahlberg never convincesAn English teacher leads a double life as a gambler. When he owes big, he borrows from a gangster and offers his own life as collateral, immersing himself in an illicit underground world that could cost him his life. Wahlberg never convinces as an English teacher and the film never seems to gain enough momentum to warrant the viewers interest. Dialogue heavy, and with an inflated sense of its own self importance, its a hard slog to get to an unsatisfying conclusion… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

8

3ebfan511Sep 26, 2015

Substitute Christian Bale for Charles Heston, with updated directing and CGI and you get an idea of this film. I am not very religious but always loved seeing the Ten Commandments as a kid, and this is a pretty decent modernization of it.Substitute Christian Bale for Charles Heston, with updated directing and CGI and you get an idea of this film. I am not very religious but always loved seeing the Ten Commandments as a kid, and this is a pretty decent modernization of it. I thought it might be too "biblical" and thus silly, but actually maintains a certain realistic sense of events, which I was not expecting and was definitely more appreciating for an atheist who grew up as catholic, appreciating the story, and the original film. He did a great job capturing a retelling of the story, without nonsensical biblical stuff, but that of course means it wont please the religiously fervent, nor the anti-religious who want nothing to do with any of it. For someone of my background however, (Catholic but now agnostic/atheist) I thought it was great.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

8

ThegodfathersonDec 28, 2014

The CGI Is very, very good. Christian Bale as Moses is spectacular. Grand, Epic and Large, these words describe what Exodus has in store for you. Ridley Scott's big budget ode to the greatest stories ever told is great but not as good as IThe CGI Is very, very good. Christian Bale as Moses is spectacular. Grand, Epic and Large, these words describe what Exodus has in store for you. Ridley Scott's big budget ode to the greatest stories ever told is great but not as good as I expected. It came from Scott, who brought us The Counselor and Alien, and I thought that seeing how good those flicks are, this could have been better. Overall, Weaver, Paul and Bale are awesome and the 3D is great. Loved It. Must catch an IMAX theatre for this one!… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

10

nono5551212Apr 30, 2015

This movie is really a 6.5 or 7 but so many people gave it an unfair score. I watched this movie through and I liked it. It was a bit slow at times. All you bible thumpers upset that they changed the story a bit can suck it.. Ask yourself howThis movie is really a 6.5 or 7 but so many people gave it an unfair score. I watched this movie through and I liked it. It was a bit slow at times. All you bible thumpers upset that they changed the story a bit can suck it.. Ask yourself how many big blockbuster movies come out about God? There are probably people out there who never knew the story and now they do...… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

8

VintyDec 23, 2014

this movie is epic. But the acting is **** **** The movie was so long that I slept mid way through. the beginning of the movie was good. but director only focussed on the first part.

0 of 10 users found this helpful010

All this user's reviews

10

CinefileDec 28, 2014

A 10. This is not a Christian movie. It is an interpretation for anyone to watch. The story of Moses is included in the Qu ran, the Torah and the Bible. For which reasons some people critique this film on the basis of it not being "biblical"A 10. This is not a Christian movie. It is an interpretation for anyone to watch. The story of Moses is included in the Qu ran, the Torah and the Bible. For which reasons some people critique this film on the basis of it not being "biblical" is very bizarre to me. The actors were chosen according to their acting ability and how Scott thought each individual fit the plot. The race of the characters does not offend me in any way. Scott did a good job. 10… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

JackConstantineJan 4, 2015

A very good film, I'm sure most of the haters here are just die hard catholics. I mean come on, It's a Riddley scott film, has scott ever lead us astray? No.

0 of 8 users found this helpful08

All this user's reviews

9

FyanElFeb 8, 2015

As of this review I'm glad the Metascore hits the 50-mark scoreline despite many negative reviews I've read from other sites. First of all, if you like religious films with a pitch of action then this is a movie to watch.
Christian Bale didAs of this review I'm glad the Metascore hits the 50-mark scoreline despite many negative reviews I've read from other sites. First of all, if you like religious films with a pitch of action then this is a movie to watch.
Christian Bale did a really good job on his character.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

10

smookedentistAug 3, 2015

Great movie!! Good reminder of Passover. The movie had the epic scene of the parting of the Red Sea and the burning bush was really cool too! It must be pretty powerful for that little kid to play G-d. That was a pretty big role and shoesGreat movie!! Good reminder of Passover. The movie had the epic scene of the parting of the Red Sea and the burning bush was really cool too! It must be pretty powerful for that little kid to play G-d. That was a pretty big role and shoes to fill for him. The 10 plagues were pretty intense especially when they got to smiting of the first born.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews