Cloverfield
Paramount Pictures | Release Date: January 18, 2008
6.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1096 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
693
Mixed:
146
Negative:
257
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
7
DukeJonMar 24, 2013
Quite an enjoyable film. Loved the documentary feel and don't agree that the monster's origins, motive, etc, needed explaining. It wasn't really about the monster, after all. The party section went on a bit too long and it didn't succeed inQuite an enjoyable film. Loved the documentary feel and don't agree that the monster's origins, motive, etc, needed explaining. It wasn't really about the monster, after all. The party section went on a bit too long and it didn't succeed in making me feel attached to the characters, the film really improved when we got to the part with the monster attacking. The only complaint I would make about this film is that to me it never seemed very believable that the characters would go to their certain deaths on the off-chance of saving someone's ex-girlfriend. If they had been a couple going back to save their baby (left with babysitters across town?) then it would have made a lot more sense.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
spadenxDec 9, 2011
Once you get past the whole shaky cam thing (which really made the movie) its just your generic monster movie plot. It was an enjoyable film but it was poorly executed.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
JAM123Oct 16, 2011
This right here is a very under-rated movie. It was a very cool and successful expeiriment that I thought did exceedingly well. It not only kept my attention and stayed interesting throughout the whole thing, it began a new era of film. ItThis right here is a very under-rated movie. It was a very cool and successful expeiriment that I thought did exceedingly well. It not only kept my attention and stayed interesting throughout the whole thing, it began a new era of film. It brought the idea of making the movie look like it was home videoed to the attention of the film industry. I also love the producer(J.J. Abrams) and the director did well with this movie too(Matt Reeves). So after all of that about how good it is your probably asking yourself, "why did he give it a 7/10?" Well the movie isn't completely perfect. I thought for one it could have been a bit longer. It only being like one hour and 10 minutes was kinda a let down. Also, I know it was like home videoed but there was a little too much zooming in and out and shaking of the camera. It didn't have the best angles either. It also was hard to see I feel like. The only time you can watch it is if your in a dark area because in a lot of the parts the glare makes it hard to see the screen and whats going on. One more thing is the actors. They didn't do the best job of acting in this. I guess most of them were just begginning actoras and actresses but they could have done a little better. The only one that did a professional job was Lizzy Caplin(Marlena). She was pretty good in it but then again she has been in a couple of movies before this one. She's not the best acteress though for sure. There is many others better than her, no defense Lizzy. I guess T.J. Miller(Hud) had done a prett y good job too. He had also been in a few movies before too. So those are a few things that this movie lacks and if they make a remake... add these please. So this movie is a pretty good movie with a good plotline and amazing special effects. I highly reccommend you see it.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
10
MetalMan95Dec 1, 2010
This is one roller coaster ride. Although this does require a suspension of disbelief because this was on-camera monster attack on NYC, It made me believe it actually happened. This movie was scary, thrilling, emotional, and just plainThis is one roller coaster ride. Although this does require a suspension of disbelief because this was on-camera monster attack on NYC, It made me believe it actually happened. This movie was scary, thrilling, emotional, and just plain freakin awesome! I didnt mind the ending whatsoever. Awesome movie.… Expand
11 of 16 users found this helpful115
All this user's reviews
7
gm101Aug 26, 2011
The movie certainly has a good premise, but unanswered questions in the end and a camera that is way too shaky disrupt the experience.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
tvbuffJan 12, 2011
Had this come out before Blair Witch think the ratings would have been better but it didn't so...It's really just an Alien version. Still pretty good. I think a sequel could have potential believe it or not.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
rotkuJul 4, 2011
Entertaining movie made entirely in a documentary style which adds to the feel of realism. Good pace and character build up and believable in so far as a monster movie can be. Well worth watching.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
CharlottePApr 13, 2011
Given that I watched this in less-than-perfect conditions on the plane through piss-poor headphones, the seat in front reclined right in my face, a tiny screen, screaming babies ago-go, and a fat American man snoring loudly next to me, it wasGiven that I watched this in less-than-perfect conditions on the plane through piss-poor headphones, the seat in front reclined right in my face, a tiny screen, screaming babies ago-go, and a fat American man snoring loudly next to me, it was surprisingly engaging. The word "steadi-cam" did pop into my head a few times - the street scenes particularly were suspiciously cleanly shot - there were a few unlikely escapes (but wait - I thought she was near death with a girder sticking out of her chest?), and of course the monster was ridiculous even in broad half-seen brushstrokes; but there was a sense of fear and panic in the film that must have been rather difficult to manufacture, and i thought it quite convincingly captured the sheer panic, helplessness and chaos of an uncontrollable disaster situation.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
Spielberg00Sep 9, 2011
From the creator of the recently-ended TV series LOST (who is now known as the director of later films STAR TREK and SUPER 8, as well), CLOVERFIELD is the thrilling point where THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW, PARANORMAL ACTIVITY, and GODZILLA allFrom the creator of the recently-ended TV series LOST (who is now known as the director of later films STAR TREK and SUPER 8, as well), CLOVERFIELD is the thrilling point where THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW, PARANORMAL ACTIVITY, and GODZILLA all meet. The use of the similar "cinéma vérité" and "found footage" styles are prevalent to the film's plot, as it enhances the believability of the disaster which the story is centered on. At first, I didn't think it was going to be that great of a film, as it began with a light-hearted mood, but by twenty minutes into it, once the whole disaster started to take place, I was thrilled. Also, the ending was not that great, and it left me flummoxed by how complex it was, but think of the endings to other films made in "found footage" style--especially THE LAST EXORCISM--if you may: they were the same way. Overall, I thought this was a fantastic film. To create yet another monster was a brilliant idea, and for once well-tackled. But if there's one thing about CLOVERFIELD that really goes beyond expectations, it's the cinematography and how ingeniously every action is captured--even if it's on home video.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
lasttimeisawMay 19, 2012
As the instigator of pseudo-documentary horror/sci-fi, four-years later, I finally got the chance to watch it, stripped down to the film per se, a 80 minutes running time has testified the audienceâ
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
gregforeliDec 7, 2012
This was an effective film the first time around. It's still a gripping watch, although some may find elements of the film a bit annoying. Getting through the first 20 minutes or so really tested my patience as I was not sure what to expect,This was an effective film the first time around. It's still a gripping watch, although some may find elements of the film a bit annoying. Getting through the first 20 minutes or so really tested my patience as I was not sure what to expect, or when to expect it.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
JakeH.May 24, 2008
This movie was a classic version of Godzilla, it was very supsenseful and very....shakey. The camera looked like it was a digital hand held camera I only saw the Cloverfield monster once just before the camera man got eaten, Yum. But over This movie was a classic version of Godzilla, it was very supsenseful and very....shakey. The camera looked like it was a digital hand held camera I only saw the Cloverfield monster once just before the camera man got eaten, Yum. But over all this movie was pretty short, like 1hour long and it ends with the cloverfield monster destroying the 2 main characters, but it was a good horror monster movie throughout.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
10
Bullet97Aug 19, 2010
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Friggin amazing!! Scary, suspenseful, action-packed, and creppy!! JJ Abrams delivers an eerrie tale of a giant monster ripping apart New York. The directing is fantastic as we see the city being destroyed from the perspective of a group of survivors, who slowly get killed off one by one!! This movie rocks!!… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
MarkMusicMar 25, 2013
Better then Avatar, Hunger Games, Twilight, etc. Probably the second best film of 2008 other then Marley and Me. Pretty good acting, visually amazing, plot (New York under attack, man goes to get his ex-girlfriend) simple, handheld cameraBetter then Avatar, Hunger Games, Twilight, etc. Probably the second best film of 2008 other then Marley and Me. Pretty good acting, visually amazing, plot (New York under attack, man goes to get his ex-girlfriend) simple, handheld camera made it more realistic I say definintly check out, great B+!… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
BakaHaramMay 23, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie has one of the scariest monsters ever put on film. You can only briefly see him before the final scene, but when you finally see his face, well, I wanted to hide under the bed and close my eyes. He is truly hideous and alien looking, unlike, say, Godzilla, who has the most generic design ever.
But the best thing is that this terrifying monster was put in a really good movie, which is less of a monster flick and more of a chronicle of a disaster that is relentless and merciless. No one survives in this, and it is at it should be, considering the tone of the movie. This is not some Godzilla flick where people stand around and atomic bombs do nothing at all. If this type of event happened in real life, the only salvation for those who came in contact with it would be death.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
LuiS.Jan 18, 2008
It was a great ride and a terrifying reminding of that day in September.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
10
RobR.Jan 19, 2008
I don;y rate movies 10, if its really good it gets an 8 or a 9. This movie was amazing, no spoilers from me(its not godzilla). Yes it shows the monster.Yes people die. But the rest is for you to see and experience yourself. The single best I don;y rate movies 10, if its really good it gets an 8 or a 9. This movie was amazing, no spoilers from me(its not godzilla). Yes it shows the monster.Yes people die. But the rest is for you to see and experience yourself. The single best movie i've ever seen. (Also Stay after the credits for a little bonus, its hard to make out but might change the way you look at the movie when its over).… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
LolaGJan 19, 2008
Awesome movie on many levels.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
JacobBApr 21, 2009
the best monster movie in years. Cloverfield puts you in the position of the characters who have little idea whats going on and are only trying to survive. This movie gave me chills the first time I saw it. A MUST SEE FILM.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
10
KenK.Jan 18, 2008
I went into Cloverfield thinking it was going to be a movie, and I got a videotape of what happened. Realizing this, I accepted it for what it was and watched this interesting art piece. The entire movie I was sucked into so much, I forgot I I went into Cloverfield thinking it was going to be a movie, and I got a videotape of what happened. Realizing this, I accepted it for what it was and watched this interesting art piece. The entire movie I was sucked into so much, I forgot I was even in the theater. They did a perfect job making it as real as possible. Not just in the special effects(they were flawless, by the way), but in the way everyone reacted in the movie to everything that went on. It had a great, yet subtle story arc and explained exactly how it would have been explained if this happened and someone had a camcorder. It was a masterpiece of non-mainstream art.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful
10
[Anonymous]Jan 18, 2008
I didn't expect all that much from a modern-day Godzilla movie, but I was blown away by how well-done this movie was. Fantastic. I also find it amazing how many "professional" critics couldn't get over the shaky camera. I imagine I didn't expect all that much from a modern-day Godzilla movie, but I was blown away by how well-done this movie was. Fantastic. I also find it amazing how many "professional" critics couldn't get over the shaky camera. I imagine the same critics would have been crying foul if the camera didn't seem like it was really being toted around by one of the characters. So well done that it didn't even cross my mind while I was watching it that these were actors and not real people stuck in this situation.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
KAJan 19, 2008
Shaky cam is original and suits the movie, spectacular special effects and an awesome monster. A solid film which should not disappointed.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
jodyg.Jan 19, 2008
Can't stop thinking about this movie. I must go see it again/.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
BredB.Jan 18, 2008
The single greatest movie i have ever seen!! I was left emotionally drained. The acting is flawless and the tention is through the roof. Cloverfield set new standers of movie viewers!
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
ALIVERJ.Jan 18, 2008
If you're a thrill-seeker, like crazy shots, or a fan of the documentary, and like reality TV, this movie is for you. I like all movies ranging from sophisticated period-pieces, to action-packed thrillers, and this by far, had me on the If you're a thrill-seeker, like crazy shots, or a fan of the documentary, and like reality TV, this movie is for you. I like all movies ranging from sophisticated period-pieces, to action-packed thrillers, and this by far, had me on the edge of my seat. So much so, at one point, I wanted to get off the ride. After the first 15 minutes, the movie does not stop. I think it will be a 100% success.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
DustinU.Jan 26, 2008
Aside from a slow start. The movie never lets up with the suspense. If you didn't care for the Blair Witch Project this film might not be for you with camera movement. The performances are top notch.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
7
ChrisCAug 18, 2008
Be warned: If you thought you might see this movie and have it suspend your disbelief, be aware that the movie seriously jumps the shark a ways through. But if you're willing to accept that, it's an entertaining romp through a Be warned: If you thought you might see this movie and have it suspend your disbelief, be aware that the movie seriously jumps the shark a ways through. But if you're willing to accept that, it's an entertaining romp through a frightening apocalypse in Manhattan that captures the visceral chaos of a city half-destroyed. A monster-movie no doubt. But it's all in the eye of the beholder.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
7
PanchogulJul 23, 2019
Siempre me gusto mucho esta película, pero el agitado y excesivo movimiento de cámara hace difícil disfrutarla en su totalidad ya que hasta provoca dolor de cabeza, sólo eso.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
DonnyN.Feb 8, 2008
It was a very good film and the ending was perfect - what do other movie goers expect to get from a "Military Archive Tape"??? It was refreshing to see a "monster attacks" movie from a first person perspective rather the 3rd person scale we It was a very good film and the ending was perfect - what do other movie goers expect to get from a "Military Archive Tape"??? It was refreshing to see a "monster attacks" movie from a first person perspective rather the 3rd person scale we usually see these movies from. A great idea. The filming was actually very tolerable. I felt a little sick watching Blair Witch Project but Cloverfield was much more controlled.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
kathrynk.Jan 20, 2008
What a wonderfully thrilling movie experience this film was. I was part of a group of several people, ranging in age from 20 to 62, who saw this movie together and unanimously loved it! I can see how some parts of the movie would be judged What a wonderfully thrilling movie experience this film was. I was part of a group of several people, ranging in age from 20 to 62, who saw this movie together and unanimously loved it! I can see how some parts of the movie would be judged difficult to watch because of the hand-held camera work, but all of us agreed that this just heightened the sense of what we were watching as happening in real time. Anyway, if my sixty-one-year-old mother was able to cope with the camera work, I don't see how anyone else couldn't, and my mother is prone to car sickness! She just closed her eyes at some of the more difficult parts to watch. I say just cowboy-up and go see this film. Don't wait for it to come out on DVD or you'll be robbing yourself of a good time. "Cloverfield" should be enjoyed on a theater screen with a shattering sound system!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
LongC.Jun 4, 2008
Wonderful, thrilling, and uniqie expirience with great characters, but deliberately leaves you with no answers.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AncplAEHHcJan 18, 2008
Cloverfield was pretty good. the sound and picture was awesome, except when the screen shook a lot or it was tilted; this also gave a feeling that you were really there, so it was good and bad. i think the ending blew it though. itCloverfield was pretty good. the sound and picture was awesome, except when the screen shook a lot or it was tilted; this also gave a feeling that you were really there, so it was good and bad. i think the ending blew it though. it wasn't that but, . .. it's kind of like you wanted more. they could've explained it like "20 years later" or something like that.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DaveY.Jan 19, 2008
This movie would have been perfect if A: NORMAL CAMERA WORK AND B: DON'T END SO ABRUPTLY!!!! GIVE ME A LIL MORE INFO
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
HooahJan 21, 2008
This is a great movie!!!!! do not pay attention to the people saying otherwise. GREAT effects! good acting, Great directing, jumped out of my seat MANY times, it kept you thinking what, how, why IF YOU ARE GOING TO SEE A MOVIE SEE THIS ONE!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
c.notasJan 20, 2008
I thought this movie was one of the best movies i have ever seen. I would definetly give this 10/10.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MerylD.Jan 20, 2008
The obviousness is a detriment--if you're going to use our "new emotional context" for terror (which is now ~ 7 years ago and only resonates for people in New York City and/or airports), you should at least do so with artistic purpose, The obviousness is a detriment--if you're going to use our "new emotional context" for terror (which is now ~ 7 years ago and only resonates for people in New York City and/or airports), you should at least do so with artistic purpose, even if you are just making a "monster movie." Vacuous characterization helps me root for the monster, which I would've liked alot more if it wasn't the same old pallid goblinesque "Cave/I Am Legend/every other movie monster of late" creature. The interesting thing about the Blair Witch was what you didn't see. Cloverfield gets by on what you do see--computer explosions, somewhat menacing spider-crab babies and the Statue of Liberty's head bowled through Manhattan (Chuck Heston must've winced in his sleep). In other words, good fireworks I will forget in about a week.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DanJan 27, 2008
Why am I not surprised. Something different comes along and it gets booed (I couldn't believe it myself until the boos at the end of the movie). I'll admit I was a big queezy with the handycam for the first 5 minutes; but the style Why am I not surprised. Something different comes along and it gets booed (I couldn't believe it myself until the boos at the end of the movie). I'll admit I was a big queezy with the handycam for the first 5 minutes; but the style suited it so well: finally some more experimentation since blair witch. As for the abrupt conclusion, how could people not expect it? It fit perfectly, and helped to sell it. It had great cg and special effects (especially how they fit it all in handycam settings). I found the acting was natural and sold well. Overall great movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
StefanosM.Feb 17, 2008
Great Suspense, Cinema Experience Keeps You Hooked. Filming Of It Makes It Feel Realistic. Amazing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
LuisG.Feb 20, 2008
HYPE !!! dang the HYPE i wanted to be blown away but there i was expecting something else .. guess its my fault ... cloverfield was and will be a monster movie that will just be shelved away intension are admirable but i was shortchanged i HYPE !!! dang the HYPE i wanted to be blown away but there i was expecting something else .. guess its my fault ... cloverfield was and will be a monster movie that will just be shelved away intension are admirable but i was shortchanged i will will do a follow-up and screen again...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PeteH.Feb 25, 2008
The second most astonishing experience I've ever enjoyed at the cinema, the first being the original Star Wars when I was five. I was lucky and somehow completely missed the hype, so I went in with only low-level expectations given the The second most astonishing experience I've ever enjoyed at the cinema, the first being the original Star Wars when I was five. I was lucky and somehow completely missed the hype, so I went in with only low-level expectations given the large amounts of negative commentary on the net. For the first twenty minutes some annoying kids were burping and swearing in the cinema (bless - up past their bedtimes) but as soon as things kicked off they sat there in stunned silence, just like everyone else. We all shuffled out of the cinema mumbling and punch drunk. I completely forgot to eat my popcorn and my bloody hands were shaking! When did a movie last do that to me? Er... never, dude. Not even watching Alien on video alone in a large house with the lights out when I was thirteen. Brilliant special effects, even better sound. Totally suspends disbelief, it's horribly, horribly real-feeling. The videocam storytelling technique completely removes the fourth wall, so the audience is right there trapped in New York with the rampaging monsters. Absolute genius, bloody terrifying, short, horrific and sweet as hell.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RyanPFeb 2, 2008
People who gave this a low score totally missed the point of this movie. This film was near on perfect the characters were introduced well, the action scenes were amazing. The monster had enough coverage and every loss of a character made People who gave this a low score totally missed the point of this movie. This film was near on perfect the characters were introduced well, the action scenes were amazing. The monster had enough coverage and every loss of a character made you feel for the others left behind. It was the quiet scenes like in the subway that provided the most emotional moments and the silence in some parts provided such a tense atmosphere in the cinema. The story was spot on, it didn't need to have an explanation of what the monster was or where it came from as the characters couldn't of possibly found out that information and I'm sure if a monster was chasing you the main thing you would be trying to do would be staying alive not . investigating! The ending was excellent and the skip to the old video was such a good idea. go see it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ChrisHFeb 3, 2008
Honestly this was a great movie so as any critic I will list the good and the bad. The good: great effects, intense, exiting, exilerating and pretty much just great. The bad: short, had a bad ending. So there you go a lot of good and little Honestly this was a great movie so as any critic I will list the good and the bad. The good: great effects, intense, exiting, exilerating and pretty much just great. The bad: short, had a bad ending. So there you go a lot of good and little bad 9 out of 10.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
NigelO.Feb 6, 2008
The beauty of this film is that part of you thinks you are actually there,and allows you to think what it would be like for you.Great sound and special effects.and a cool ending.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChrisC.Feb 8, 2008
Wow! amazing. those people who complain about motion sickness - shutup!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AmyA.Apr 1, 2008
I loved this movie, more than any other movie. I cannot understand why so many people seemed to have a distaste for this movie. I will agree that a few things (ie. the phones still working, and Hud still holding the camera, and the camera I loved this movie, more than any other movie. I cannot understand why so many people seemed to have a distaste for this movie. I will agree that a few things (ie. the phones still working, and Hud still holding the camera, and the camera still being intact) didn't make sence, but putting that aside, the movie was incredable. Not to mention the viral marketing was pure genius. I give it a 10/10 because it just blew my mind. I never would have imagined a monster movie leaving me with my jaw dropped the way it was, but Cloverfield produced it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JasonE.May 3, 2008
This movie deserves far more praise than it gets. My only hope is that it goes the way of Wizard of Oz, It's A Wonderful Life, and Blade Runner before it - polarizing critics and audiences when it comes out, but considered a classic This movie deserves far more praise than it gets. My only hope is that it goes the way of Wizard of Oz, It's A Wonderful Life, and Blade Runner before it - polarizing critics and audiences when it comes out, but considered a classic down the road. I, for one, think that it's the most creative, realistic, original, exciting, and personal stories told on screen. Absolutely brilliant in every way.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RobertI.May 4, 2008
Blair witch meets godzilla. Totally bogus premise, you won't believe a minute of it, but, having said that, it's so entertaining that you don't want to leave your seat for a minute. Who's going to get creamed? Eaten Blair witch meets godzilla. Totally bogus premise, you won't believe a minute of it, but, having said that, it's so entertaining that you don't want to leave your seat for a minute. Who's going to get creamed? Eaten alive? What's at the end of the subway tunnel? Who's shooting all those cannonballs of fire? Will Manhattan be nuked? Kids in peril are as old as pauline, but, man, what a trip!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
kittyJul 6, 2008
I liked this movie, it wasn't my favorite movie ever, but I was still entertained, and I still had moments of panic.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PatrickM.Jul 8, 2008
People expected too much from this movie and got disappointed. They wanted a typical Hollywood movie with a typical Hollywood ending and they didn't get one so they weren't satisfied. This was different and not in a bad way.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
TimHJun 30, 2009
I understand that this movie isn't for everyone. Taking that into consideration, the grading criteria is as follows: If: you are looking for an artsy think flick where you come away knowing more about the human condition, then avoid I understand that this movie isn't for everyone. Taking that into consideration, the grading criteria is as follows: If: you are looking for an artsy think flick where you come away knowing more about the human condition, then avoid this. If, however: you are looking for a terrifying POV horror film ripoff where half a dozen trust fund kiddies die before your eyes, check this on your Netflix list.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JamesP.Jan 17, 2008
An in-your-face thriller that takes no prisoners and spares no sentiment. Its use of hand helds, dialogue to camera and even the general storyline may not be original but it is effective. There won't be many better thrillers this year.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MH.Jan 18, 2008
Great movie camera movements a little crappy at the start but a great idea with amazing special effects more like a ride at the amusement park or a video game some critics only like artsy stuff but if you like action jj abrums kicks ass.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ShelbyJ.Jan 18, 2008
It was really good and intense. it was scary in the sense that it was somewhat realistic. mainly because it was filmed in the first person by a main character and the fact that the actors werent well known. and because it was set inIt was really good and intense. it was scary in the sense that it was somewhat realistic. mainly because it was filmed in the first person by a main character and the fact that the actors werent well known. and because it was set in manhattan, a place that most people know of, rather than some random small town in texas that noone has heard of. compared to most horror and/or action films today, it was very well done.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
GaryH.Jan 19, 2008
Not many movies make me jump out of my seat but this one had me going. Love how it's a documentary of a group of friends during the monsters attack. At first I was a little disappointed at the ending, but then the thought of a sequal Not many movies make me jump out of my seat but this one had me going. Love how it's a documentary of a group of friends during the monsters attack. At first I was a little disappointed at the ending, but then the thought of a sequal made everything fine.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChrisW.Jan 19, 2008
After reading some of these reviews, I have to wonder if they are actually seeing this movie in an actual movie theatre or on their Sony DVD player in their car? This movie was perfectly scarry. If you have ever seen any of the original After reading some of these reviews, I have to wonder if they are actually seeing this movie in an actual movie theatre or on their Sony DVD player in their car? This movie was perfectly scarry. If you have ever seen any of the original B-scarry movies in the fifties... this is an instant throwback to it. This is a must see movie for the sound alone. I was trembling the entire way through it. Loved it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
FrankB.Jan 19, 2008
The concept was genius, but the production was unpolished at the editorial level. I went to see a monster flick and ended up walking out feeling seasick rather than feeling any sense of excitement at experiencing something amazing. I'll The concept was genius, but the production was unpolished at the editorial level. I went to see a monster flick and ended up walking out feeling seasick rather than feeling any sense of excitement at experiencing something amazing. I'll bet there are little kids puking outside theaters all across this country after seeing this movie. I had to close my eyes and just listen to large stretches. In retrospect, the latter was completely unneccessary, and could have been avoided with better editing (to cut down excessively long, and pointless as far as suspense and plot-line go, roller-coaster rides following the characters running up stairs, etc.). The movie also would have worked better with just one or two more elements of the "back story" (was the creature alien or deap sea?).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PeteVSpeteJan 19, 2008
This movie made me feel something I have not felt in a long time. When all is said and done, and the credits roll, and the house lights come up, I honestly felt as if I had been in a car crash. That tingle, the fire rushing through your This movie made me feel something I have not felt in a long time. When all is said and done, and the credits roll, and the house lights come up, I honestly felt as if I had been in a car crash. That tingle, the fire rushing through your veins, I just survived a rabid giraffe attack feeling...Without giving anything away, I really believe the monster takes a back seat in this movie, and the spirit of human nature shines. My only complaint is this, don't sit too close to the screen. And by all means, for the sake of ambience and sound, see this film in the theater, don't wait for the DVD,… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
PaulKJan 19, 2008
My biggest complaint was the use of the handheld camera, which is central to the premise of the movie, but it gave me a massive headache about 2/3 of the way into the film. I was fearful of the portrayal of the monster(s), but it wasn't My biggest complaint was the use of the handheld camera, which is central to the premise of the movie, but it gave me a massive headache about 2/3 of the way into the film. I was fearful of the portrayal of the monster(s), but it wasn't cheesy or too in your face like war of the worlds, and signs, etc. The writers borrowed too much thematically from Aliens, and the ending was completely predictable given the premise, but if you're curious about this, it's worth seeing in the theater.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AlanHJan 19, 2008
Fantastic Movie! I know we all have an opinion though I find it hard to understand what is not to like about this movie if you have any interest in this genre.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
StevenB.Jan 22, 2008
The only reason you shouldn't like this movie is if you weren't warned before going to see it that the camera is really shaky. Other than that, I believe that Cloverfield is definitely the best monster that has been created in a long time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DJImJan 20, 2008
Great movie. I don't get why people are giving it low scores. It's a monster movie. And its effective and original. I'm sure all the imitators that come later will be far inferior.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JohnJan 20, 2008
I thought this was one of the best monster movies I've seen in a long time. I don't know what some of these other people are complaining about.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
FrankFrankJan 29, 2008
Brilliant movie. It absolutely felt like I was there, and despite being a monster movie, seemed completely plausible. Will see at least 2 more times.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MysenS.Feb 12, 2008
At first glance of Cloverfield, I thought it would be an excellent, almost original film to see. The commercials and trailers really captured my attention about how good Cloverfield would be... but in my opinion that was as good as it would At first glance of Cloverfield, I thought it would be an excellent, almost original film to see. The commercials and trailers really captured my attention about how good Cloverfield would be... but in my opinion that was as good as it would get. When I stepped out of the theater there was only one thing on my mind: How bad the ending was. Believe me, the entire film is spectacular and eye-popping visuals and amazingly blended in with the shaky camera, but if you really loved the characters or were at least concerned about the main ones at the beginning of the movie, then prepare to be extremely disappointed. But if you try to accept the early hint that "This videotape known as Cloverfield was recovered at what was once Central Park" that should tell you right away that whatever happened to the filmmakers met a grizzly end. But the thing I hated was just he fact the entire movie was like this, there's 3 points, A, B, and C. A is the start, B is in the middle of the city, and C is escaping the city. We start at A obviously, and when we're going to C, we actually go back to B and almost A, THEN C again. That's pretty much the entire movie. So unless you like endings where the heroes meet an awful demise, or you can't take the shaky camera implemented from the "Blair Witch Project", then save $7.00 off by not going to see Cloverfield. But I would definately recommend renting it if you wanted to see it. It's just not worth the $7 it's been hailed for. You'll scream for your money back as soon as the credits roll.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ShaunQ.Feb 12, 2008
This is the best film I've seen for a long long time. If you suffer immensely from motion sickness then be warned but the camera shaking isn't that bad. You get to see plenty of the monster and for all the people that say this film This is the best film I've seen for a long long time. If you suffer immensely from motion sickness then be warned but the camera shaking isn't that bad. You get to see plenty of the monster and for all the people that say this film is rubish then you are just scared of something different. Great film worth watching!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DonA.Feb 14, 2008
How many times does the monster get a whack at them before it finally gets them? It was like a nightmare where you get away only to find that it;s right there under the bed or in the closet. I liked it despite what some are saying about the How many times does the monster get a whack at them before it finally gets them? It was like a nightmare where you get away only to find that it;s right there under the bed or in the closet. I liked it despite what some are saying about the ending. The monster is like the boogey man you might get away now but he'll get you in the end. I liked the rubber meets the road premise where we are on the ground with him not looking at him from a faraway distance. And the effects like the explosions the monster rampaging several feet away worked for me. I guess it's all subjective so sue me.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
LeeP.Feb 19, 2008
I enjoyed Cloverfield it was original and fresh. Once you get over the jerky camera work and get settled, the film does its best to make you feel the exact opposite, unsettled and vulnerable like the characters who are wondering what the I enjoyed Cloverfield it was original and fresh. Once you get over the jerky camera work and get settled, the film does its best to make you feel the exact opposite, unsettled and vulnerable like the characters who are wondering what the hell is going on. You realize that there is nothing that these individuals can do to stop the rampaging destruction that has come to New York and this is reflected well in the film. Although a hero does rise its not to save the day its merely to save the life of the girl he loves. At the end your not even sure that he was successful and whether or not the sacrifices made by his family and friends were worth it. A disaster film thats believable in feeling if not in context and that isn't scared not to wrap things up too neatly at the end. Enjoyable!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JalexD.Feb 2, 2008
I was actually very surprised by this film. It looked interesting six months before, but I wasn't sure about it when it actually came out. Of course, I just came back from seeing it and not only is it the first 4-star film of the year I was actually very surprised by this film. It looked interesting six months before, but I wasn't sure about it when it actually came out. Of course, I just came back from seeing it and not only is it the first 4-star film of the year (to me), it's also a classic piece of cinema that should be looked back on in a very positive light in the future. I actually became connected with the characters within the short time frame of the film, which was nice to discover. The sheer intensity and amazing pseudorealism of it all really made it fall together. There are a few tiny things that one could nitpick about, but even then only three. A truly great film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AlexW.Feb 20, 2008
While its 2 dimensional characters sometimes drag the performance down in the character driven scenes, as long as you don't get motion sickness this is a must see. Probably the first movie to be so bold in a post 9/11 world. The camera While its 2 dimensional characters sometimes drag the performance down in the character driven scenes, as long as you don't get motion sickness this is a must see. Probably the first movie to be so bold in a post 9/11 world. The camera works not only help suspension of disbelief oddly but put you in the shoes of a character for most of the movie which in itself is an exciting way to tell a tale. Also the image of the statue of liberty's head in the street with everyone taking photos on their phone is brilliant and In my opinion one of the best moments in disaster cinema ever, likely to be the most striking image of the year.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AaronS.Feb 3, 2008
Cloverfield is more of a ride then a film. Seeing the destruction and mayhem of NYC from a first person view is done perfectly. You'll leave the theatre thinking you had just escaped the monster yourself.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JimPFeb 9, 2008
Awesome, and believable. Best Monster flick since Jurrasic Park, definitely.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JustinK.Feb 9, 2008
Every movie should be judged by what it attempts to take a shot at - and this one, in my eyes, hits bulls eye! SPOILER WARNING! Some viewers complained about the low quality of filming, or that nothing is explained, or that you hardly see Every movie should be judged by what it attempts to take a shot at - and this one, in my eyes, hits bulls eye! SPOILER WARNING! Some viewers complained about the low quality of filming, or that nothing is explained, or that you hardly see the monster, or that the protagonists die cruelly despite noble efforts. Yes, Cloverfield takes some unusual steps, but not just for the sake of a new artsy or postmodern take on the genre. It is very effective in creating a realistic feel: given the scenario, I think this is pretty much what it would look like. Instead of being just another more-or-less-sophisticated CGI monster, wreaking boring CGI havoc that we've all see before, the realism is the only thing that could have made it scary. Which it does, by the numbers. 9 points! I'll give it a tenth point because I loved the contrast between the "horror present" video, and the nuggets of "good day" past: the shots previously recorded on the tape. This is a just monster movie, but hey, they don't come better than this. If you hate the genre itself, don't bother seeing or reviewing it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
VanessaH.Apr 1, 2008
AMAZING MOVIE!! I can't understand why anyone would not love this movie!! I have so far seen it 10 times, once in the theater, and 9 times at home. It's a masterpiece! But if they make a sequal, i will be pissed.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JayM.Apr 1, 2008
Honestly, I wish i could give this film an 11, but alas, it is not allowed. Brilliant movie. Stunning! I think some people completely missed the point of this movie. Which is a real shame. They are really missing an insanely amazing movie!! Honestly, I wish i could give this film an 11, but alas, it is not allowed. Brilliant movie. Stunning! I think some people completely missed the point of this movie. Which is a real shame. They are really missing an insanely amazing movie!! I really cannot get over this movie. I have not stopped watching it since i saw it the night it came out. Visualy, it was incredible! Emotionally, it was genius! It really made u wonder what you would have done if you were in that situation. Personally, i would not have gone into the city, but then again, maybe i would for someone i truely cared about. I loved Hud (T.J Miller). I think he was the best part of the movie. He even brought some humor into it. He was the man behing the camera. The movie may have been a bit shakey, but my eyes adjusted to it within the first 10 minutes or so. It was an unbelievable movie, and i did not see a single person get up and leave because they couldn't stand it. I think some people are just being a little dramatic. At the end people were clapping and some cheering. Stunning! There aren't even adequate words to describe this movie. Above all else, this is my new favorite movie of all time!!!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
FrankV.Apr 27, 2008
This was simply one of the most amazing movie experiences in my life. It's thrilling, witty and exhilarating experiment that provided more "wow" moments than any other film and the creature design is very interesting and original.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
L.CollinsApr 9, 2008
If you spent the first twenty minutes staring at your popcorn, then you'll have missed the only bad point of the movie. After its slow start it becomes one of the better horror films to be churned out of hollywood
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ConorDJun 21, 2008
Why does everyone hate this!? It's brilliant! I can understand the people who got motion sickness but what's everyone else's problem? @ LEMMOR I'm pretty sure thats going to happen in the sequel!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JoeDJul 13, 2008
As mentioned before, this is a movie that you either love or hate (as evidenced by the reviews). People mainly complain about the shaking of the camera or how "unrealistic" some parts are. Well, in my view the camera should be shakey. When As mentioned before, this is a movie that you either love or hate (as evidenced by the reviews). People mainly complain about the shaking of the camera or how "unrealistic" some parts are. Well, in my view the camera should be shakey. When you hold a little camcorder in your hand and run full tilt down the street in an attempt to get away before you get squashed, I would be astounded if the footage was as steady as a camera mounted to a tripod. As for the "unrealism" involving injuries and all, I just have one thing to say: You go see a movie about a monster wrecking a city, and you grief about the unrealistic portrayal of cell phone reception?! Sheesh. Anyway, I really enjoyed this movie. True, it didn't have first rate acting talent. But then again, I'd rather see new faces than see Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Jack Black, and the slew of other actors we see too much of lately. The monster ("Clover") might not have had laser eyes or atomic firebreath, but its definitely the most bad-ass monster in recent movie history. And Clover is just a baby! Imagine what momma or pappa are like? If you get the DVD, be sure to watch the "making of" special features. The talented FX crew digitally recreated hundreds of real-life NYC buildings so that they would break and collapse just like they would in real life. Plus, if you're like me and wasn't sure what the monster really looked like, the special features include detailed models and drawings of Clover. All in all, this was a great movie, despite the minor flaws. Check it out, and I hope you won't be disappointed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AlexJul 19, 2008
One of the greatest monster movies. Pure thrills and an awesome plot make for a great film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DylanB.Jul 2, 2008
a great film, the many logical problems that many people find could easily be attributed to fear and anzxiety, you would not think clearly if something like this happened, and (******SPOLIER*****) the hellicopter was'nt too far off the a great film, the many logical problems that many people find could easily be attributed to fear and anzxiety, you would not think clearly if something like this happened, and (******SPOLIER*****) the hellicopter was'nt too far off the ground and spun out of control, it didn't crash directly into the ground, also, and the impaled girl was able to move due to adrenalin, she had been impaled for atlest a couple of hours and, if she had too, could have ignored the pain and kept moving.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JavierMAug 18, 2008
Great!!! "Cloverfield" is the most amazing film of the year!!!. J.J. Abrams returns to succeed as he did with "Lost" at the moment of mixing action and drama. Very advisable!!!.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
WilliamTSep 22, 2008
Surprisingly shocking, scary and realistic. Cloverfield is probably one of the best monster movies of this decade. Think Jaws in Manhattan and thru your point of view.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
LiamJan 5, 2009
Good ideas but just had something missing. Only seen it on DVD though and I reckon the cinema would have made great use of it's tension. The elusive monster just isn't believable enough. It's a good movie, I just expected Good ideas but just had something missing. Only seen it on DVD though and I reckon the cinema would have made great use of it's tension. The elusive monster just isn't believable enough. It's a good movie, I just expected more. The characters do seem a bit flaky as well and the way the action just seems to follow them throughout Manhattan is a bit forced.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AndrewGJul 5, 2009
An enjoyable monster film, though I couldn't help hating the ending.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
J.CAug 24, 2009
This Was Incredible To Me!So Suspenseful To Me.The Only Flaws Was The Bad Ending.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BenD.Nov 5, 2008
This waz well thought out, the way it is filmed though a video camera is amazzing it has a gr8 entertaining story line, action filled without a boring moment, the could easily lead on to a second film, hope that wont b a flop if they do!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BillyS.Jan 18, 2008
There's one thing about Cloverfield that is undeniably genius, whether you love it or hate it, think it's terrifying or ridiculous, cringe in fear or simply laugh out load, the thing is you are not watching it - you're right There's one thing about Cloverfield that is undeniably genius, whether you love it or hate it, think it's terrifying or ridiculous, cringe in fear or simply laugh out load, the thing is you are not watching it - you're right in the middle of it, and I, for one, bought into it hook, line and sinker! A great movie as intense and foreboding as 28 Days Later and more of the "you are here" feeling than Blair Witch, Cloverfield is a terrific start 2008 in movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ArthurC.Jan 18, 2008
I had to check my calendar. Yep, it's January, and we've already got one of the best movies of the year. Why is it so good? Not only is it thrilling and at times scary, it is also an interesting character piece as well as I had to check my calendar. Yep, it's January, and we've already got one of the best movies of the year. Why is it so good? Not only is it thrilling and at times scary, it is also an interesting character piece as well as thoughtful movie. It truly feels like a tape that was discovered, thus may upset people since it doesn't follow standard movie formula movements. Nothing is explained, but then, why should it be? It's not about the monster, it's about people trying to survive a disaster. First rate all the way.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JohnH.Jan 18, 2008
The good: effects, sense of helplessness, one of the five actors and the world's toughest camcorder. The bad: four of the five actors.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
EricR.Jan 18, 2008
Some clunky dialogue aside I thought this was one of the better "monster movies" I have ever seen. Some people I was with complained of dizziness which I myself did not experience. A solid movie where blanks are left open for you to fill in, Some clunky dialogue aside I thought this was one of the better "monster movies" I have ever seen. Some people I was with complained of dizziness which I myself did not experience. A solid movie where blanks are left open for you to fill in, making it a better film IMHO.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JohnI.Jan 18, 2008
Best movie I've seen in years. It's not godzilla and go see it for yourself! It's action packed and one hell of a thrill.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AlienGuyJan 19, 2008
Very good, fun film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ReneTJan 19, 2008
Reading the "reviews" (I use the term loosely) from the users here, saying things like, "It suked" (their spelling, not mine) or "save your m$n$y," as though they are texting their friends the review rather than on a public forum that people Reading the "reviews" (I use the term loosely) from the users here, saying things like, "It suked" (their spelling, not mine) or "save your m$n$y," as though they are texting their friends the review rather than on a public forum that people over the age of 18 might actually be reading, just leads me to the conclusion I've held for quite some time. Your average moving-going audience is a bunch of vapid morons. About 5% of the theater we were in actually GOT what a masterpiece this truly is and WHY. The high schoolers, who were there because we forgot they were out early after taking exams, all left talking about it "sucking balls" and other colorful verbage. Nice. I guess that was thanks to its' lack of "in-your-face" footage of everything (thanks, video games!) and lack of neat, tidy little ending they could all talk about directly. Imagination!? What's THAT!? If you're the type of person who thinks the last 10 films you have seen are the most shallow, poorly acted and forgettable films EVER, then this is the film for you. If you understand what I mean by that statement, you'll most likely love it. If you don't, "save your m$n$y."… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AustinMJan 19, 2008
Extremely engrossing movie that leaves you feeling stunned. Definitely predictable, but they meant for it to be like that. The characters all seem like real people, which makes it much more interesting to watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
TylerGJan 19, 2008
Many films set out to accomplish what Cloverfield has perfected. A perfect medium between character development and action. The idea of "the less you see the scarier it is" truly is in effect in this film. Believe the hype and go see this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
catnicJan 19, 2008
JJ is a genius, a thrill of a movie, at least for those of us who "get it"...
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
HillarynotClintonJan 19, 2008
AWESOME! Reading the reviews of those whining about the shakiness reminds me of people who whime about not be able to "watch" subtitled films because they are always reading! Blergh! I get why some will not like this, you do not get closure AWESOME! Reading the reviews of those whining about the shakiness reminds me of people who whime about not be able to "watch" subtitled films because they are always reading! Blergh! I get why some will not like this, you do not get closure as you do in most mainstram films. Think of all the monster movies thrown at us over the years. You as the viewer follow several people in different locations, and as the viewer, you have the luxury of knowing more details than those involved. Now, imagine if you were in that monster movie. You only know what you are seeing, meaning there is a lot you don't know. I applaud JJ Abrams for not following typical Hollywood suit & giving us a cookie-cutter storytelling & ending. Just like the end of the Sopranos, things go on, we just don't get to see them anymore! Suspend your disbelief, hunker down in the theatre and enjoy!!!!!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
andersh.Jan 19, 2008
Too give this movie a bad rating is like having a giant golden stick up your butt that reads, "jaded." If you're looking for a few thrills and want to see a movie that is, if nothing else, completely enjoyable - than see Cloverfield. It Too give this movie a bad rating is like having a giant golden stick up your butt that reads, "jaded." If you're looking for a few thrills and want to see a movie that is, if nothing else, completely enjoyable - than see Cloverfield. It does away with complex mumbo-jumbo explanations and over-acting by puting it in a regular joe point-of-view. For those who hated Cloverfield, try taking that giant golden stick out of your behind and just relax - it's just a monster movie. And a good one at that.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NickA.Jan 19, 2008
Very original and daring, unlike anything i've seen before and so much better that i expected. the point of view is so restrictive and yet so effective, you can only expect to see what one person would have seen, and given the scale of Very original and daring, unlike anything i've seen before and so much better that i expected. the point of view is so restrictive and yet so effective, you can only expect to see what one person would have seen, and given the scale of the disaster it is only a very small fraction and yet more than enough to make for a truly engrossing and mindblowing experience.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SamYJan 19, 2008
Exciting, nonstop action!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

64 Critic Reviews

6.4 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 71 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL