Universal Pictures | Release Date: August 27, 2021
5.0
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 255 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
100
Mixed:
62
Negative:
93
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
7
Stream2BigScreeAug 27, 2021
Long awaited and overdue, this week we have before you a name that must not be repeated more than 4 times. This weekend brought us the updated version and some could say sequel to, Candyman (2021). Disclaimer, I'm crazy but I'm not stupid.Long awaited and overdue, this week we have before you a name that must not be repeated more than 4 times. This weekend brought us the updated version and some could say sequel to, Candyman (2021). Disclaimer, I'm crazy but I'm not stupid. This name will not be uttered 5 times and nor am I looking into any reflective surfaces or eating honey while writing this review. With that said, C-man is what the producers are calling a 'spiritual sequel' to the horror classic Candyman (1992) that returns to the now-gentrified Chicago neighborhood where the legend began." Let's see what they caught in their hook this time.

Now, if you know then you really know, C-man has been haunting us for nearly 30 years. There are people today that won't say the name, watch the movies, or be in the dark with a mirror because of the original film, followed by some other scary-but-not-as-great sequels. Here, the most major knock to the film is a lack of originality in the scares. They gave us the classic slasher, thriller, suspense but it lacked pizazz. Maybe because I'm an adult and I may no longer be completely traumatized by the franchise's namesake, but I wasn't shook. Now, there will be some kids and pre-teens, and teens even, who may see this flick and get the goosebumps like we did back in the day, but I doubt it. Fortunately, and unfortunately, scary films over the last decade or more have moved on from fear to gore. We are in a trend now - thanks to Jordan Peele - of getting horror films that are overtly social commentary and this movie falls straight into that category. We get some of the gore and blood. We get some of the tension of who's lurking and chasing me. Even more so, we get that gentrification is coming/here visual horrors. While it's not bad, it's a bit too preachy in this movie to be scary. I think the film could've benefitted from more of the Get Out commentary through its visuals in order to add to the creepiness. This issue is also just present in the story of C-man itself. It's not necessarily a problem but it just seems that the writers just got too heavily focused on connecting the movie to a message rather than scaring the audience. A slight miss but not off-putting.

Other than that, Candyman has a very good cast lead by Alpha man, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Teyonah Parris, and Colman Domingo. Each actor has scenes that stand out and show their range. I look forward to more films with them in it. Lastly, the movie set and scenery is just great. There are contrast and contradictions that show the idea of gentrification. The beauty of art and the meticulous placement of set design. Give me these apartments in Cabrini Green any day... without the haunting.

Nevertheless, Candyman while a bit underwhelming in the fright category still delivers a solid performance. Will we talk about it like some have since 1992? Doubtful but this does keep a trend of solid productions by Jordan Peele, MonkeyPaw and Bron Studios. I look forward to more work from Nia DaCosta but Can….. Not happening. The flick gets a bowl of popcorn. Go see this movie in the daylight for a matinee price and make sure you check it out when it comes to streaming services in the comfort of your own dark home!
Expand
15 of 21 users found this helpful156
All this user's reviews
10
LylauAug 27, 2021
A wonderful Spectrum of art, her music and art direction is just perfect. She created a whole univers with her feelings and what she was going through. The lyrics points where it hurts and speaks louder than a scream. A 10/10
17 of 24 users found this helpful177
All this user's reviews
9
VaxoramaAug 27, 2021
A smart & sleek update to a 90's classic. Expands on the original lore in a modern and powerful way. Artistically shot with a great score and a modern twist. As a fan of the original I am happy to report that this film is excellent.
18 of 26 users found this helpful188
All this user's reviews
7
tropicAcesAug 27, 2021
About as good as Jordan Peele’s “Us”, the film works as both a reboot and sequel to the (pretty good) 1992 original. I can see it’s going to get review bombed, so for those curious there is only one awkward “woke” scene, the whole thing isn’tAbout as good as Jordan Peele’s “Us”, the film works as both a reboot and sequel to the (pretty good) 1992 original. I can see it’s going to get review bombed, so for those curious there is only one awkward “woke” scene, the whole thing isn’t bad. But take all this how you will… Expand
15 of 22 users found this helpful157
All this user's reviews
10
basketballmanAug 27, 2021
This was an incredible film, and quite possible the best film I've ever seen in my life. I've never felt so speechless in a theater before. Those writing negative reviews are likely only doing so because they disagree with the "political"This was an incredible film, and quite possible the best film I've ever seen in my life. I've never felt so speechless in a theater before. Those writing negative reviews are likely only doing so because they disagree with the "political" themes of the movie, which is absurd. Themes aside, this movie is incredibly well shot, incredibly well written, and simply a masterpiece of art. The way it masterfully ties in modern real world issues, just like how the original film did, was fantastic. I did not expect the movie to be this good. Hats off to everyone who was apart of making this movie. Bravo. Probably the most powerful film I've ever seen. The negative reviews are either missing the point completely and judging this as if it was supposed to be some kind of run-of-the-mill horror film and it wasn't "scary enough", or they are "blue lives matter" type people who were offended by it. I urge anyone who hasn't watched it to ignore reviews and watch it for themselves. How anyone could give such a masterfully crafted film a 0/10 is astonishing. It almost further drives home the movie's message. Again, bravo to the creators of this film. Expand
32 of 48 users found this helpful3216
All this user's reviews
2
sevenPillarsAug 27, 2021
I was excited for this movie, but it was terrible, and I was thoroughly disappointed. It was not the least bit exciting or horrifying, which sucks because the Candyman is a cool character that deserved a better movie than this. Not reallyI was excited for this movie, but it was terrible, and I was thoroughly disappointed. It was not the least bit exciting or horrifying, which sucks because the Candyman is a cool character that deserved a better movie than this. Not really sure what they were trying to accomplish. There are a few cool shots and some decent acting, but that's about it. The plot goes nowhere and the dialog is terrible. Don't waste your time/money Expand
15 of 27 users found this helpful1512
All this user's reviews
0
VenonomiconJul 14, 2022
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
bersi84Apr 25, 2022
I ve never seen a Candyman movie before so it was time to get out of the way. I felt Candyman checks some good boxes and clicked for me at times but not always. It has some gory elements, some scariness and also a background story thats notI ve never seen a Candyman movie before so it was time to get out of the way. I felt Candyman checks some good boxes and clicked for me at times but not always. It has some gory elements, some scariness and also a background story thats not too bad although quite thin but hey.. it is a horror movie right. Some elements of the movie are quite disgusting too achieving a nice mix in the end. Why only a 7? It didnt feel too special and along the road there were unnecessary mix-ins that felt more stupid than anything else.

After all it was a nice watch that felt a little bit too long and the ending is debatable.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
JeBjBoJan 17, 2022
Candyman is visually stunning and I really liked the play on mirrors and reflecting surfaces as well as the extended Candyman mythology. The original had better story and atmosphere, though.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
ODballin11May 15, 2022
Fun Thrills Chills Get off the couch and feel this pain Solid Movie and would like to see the next part 7.5 out of 10
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
AshenWonJun 18, 2022
The cinematography and musical score are exceptional. The opening credits sets a tone that feels like this could be a redeeming re-imagination of the classic… Unfortunately, that is where the spectacle ends.

The topics this film centre
The cinematography and musical score are exceptional. The opening credits sets a tone that feels like this could be a redeeming re-imagination of the classic… Unfortunately, that is where the spectacle ends.

The topics this film centre around, and have been doubled-down upon, are handled without any tact whatsoever. It’s tunnel-vision small mindedness race baiting, seemingly without a motive other than resentment and division.

It’s a film that focuses on the injustices of racism, but ironically is racist itself, which I cannot condone.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
dannyjoe08Oct 30, 2021
This movie is some racist ass garbage. Every single white person is a villain in this movie. Not a scary moment in this whole film.
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
9
tellmikeyySep 12, 2021
A near-phenomenal sequel to the 1992 classic. The reveal in the middle of the film had me in shock and the Candyman scenes were shot SO well! Anything Jordan Peele touches in anyway shape or form, is pure excellent. I'm very glad we didn'tA near-phenomenal sequel to the 1992 classic. The reveal in the middle of the film had me in shock and the Candyman scenes were shot SO well! Anything Jordan Peele touches in anyway shape or form, is pure excellent. I'm very glad we didn't get Candyman scenes here and there throughout the film, he was prominent from start to finish. One of my favorite films this year! And of course, great to see Tony Todd again! Expand
9 of 11 users found this helpful92
All this user's reviews
0
blackspotDec 28, 2021
ridiculous "black people good white people bad" propaganda, we have a new face of horror movies... new horror moves camo wirh polititics and it is a real shame
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
3
zBernieOct 8, 2021
This movie was woke ad nauseum. It was like a movie was made around liberal talking points. We had an interracial homosexual couple. References to evil white supremacists building ghettos. Evil police killing an innocent black man, all ofThis movie was woke ad nauseum. It was like a movie was made around liberal talking points. We had an interracial homosexual couple. References to evil white supremacists building ghettos. Evil police killing an innocent black man, all of which added nothing to the story. I could not even finish watching it. I think I'll watch the 1991 version! Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
mostroDec 10, 2021
As someone who does not live in the USA, nor have interest in their political social commentary, this movie was a painful watch; the amount of cliche scenes, from racist corrupt white cops, to how white people created ghettos to then gentrifyAs someone who does not live in the USA, nor have interest in their political social commentary, this movie was a painful watch; the amount of cliche scenes, from racist corrupt white cops, to how white people created ghettos to then gentrify them out of hate of black people, just feels like the script was made by a political activist. This film was overly political for and against a specific audience in the USA. If you do not live in this country, this might either be irrelevant or outright boring.

There are better films to spend the 90 minutes I wasted watching this.
Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
NMNOct 16, 2021
This movie was so awful it's actually what brought me to finally create a metacritic account. I'll make it short. This movie captures none of the gothic charm of the original. It goes out of its way to fulfill the woke agenda, and in theThis movie was so awful it's actually what brought me to finally create a metacritic account. I'll make it short. This movie captures none of the gothic charm of the original. It goes out of its way to fulfill the woke agenda, and in the process does nothing to create a compelling story, all the while alienating half the audience. The horror aspect of it, which is almost non-existent, is so utterly cheesy it's disrespectful to paying customers. Those who are here because they liked the original; it captures none of the charm nor suspense of the original. The only thing I can say is, I learned my lesson on paying to see something with DaCosta's or Peele's name attached to it. Never again. Expand
7 of 9 users found this helpful72
All this user's reviews
8
JPV328Aug 31, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It’s good but not great. Very interesting the way it ties into the first one. A lot of great acting. A few good jumps scares.

All the reviews complaining about “woke messages” and “propaganda” are nonsense. Disregard. Go see the movie for yourself and keep an open mind.
Expand
13 of 17 users found this helpful134
All this user's reviews
3
bhappenstanceOct 16, 2021
Amazed by how awful this new version is, especially with the pedigree of talent involved. Multiple, conflicting backstories confuse Candyman as a character, who is stripped of his seductive qualities, and is simply a specter of menace. (WhichAmazed by how awful this new version is, especially with the pedigree of talent involved. Multiple, conflicting backstories confuse Candyman as a character, who is stripped of his seductive qualities, and is simply a specter of menace. (Which is *fine*, but nowhere near as interesting as the original character.) There's no reason to root for either of the two protagonists -- one an ill-defined art dealer, the other an ill-defined artist. Neither has any clear sense of desire or motivation. With no one to root for, the narrative is a vacuum in which lots of stuff happens, and a lot of social justice tropes are trotted out for the sake of establishing Contemporary Relevance (TM), but nothing about the plot lands or feels meaningful. As a villain, Candyman poses the same threat as innumerable other movie villains, which is a massive shame given how compelling and empathetic the character once was. There is some stellar shadow-puppetry, and the cinematography is passably slick, but the aesthetics can't make up for the boring, nonsensical plot, which includes a "twist" so dumb that I gave up twenty minutes before the movie ended. Expand
6 of 8 users found this helpful62
All this user's reviews
8
White_WormSep 3, 2021
Loved it. Takes the original story and deepens it by measures. Adds weight to the mythos and has some genuinely scary moments. Tense, thrilling, great dialog and acting.
10 of 14 users found this helpful104
All this user's reviews
8
lunden420Sep 2, 2021
this was a great follow up film...way more relatable to me then the first one although the story could have been tighter i do not regret paying 10$ to see this film i was entertained
10 of 14 users found this helpful104
All this user's reviews
8
failmingoAug 29, 2021
I'll be very excited to go see Candyman a second time. The whole time, my brain was just racing ahead, trying to figure out what was going to happen. Now that I know the whole story from beginning to end, I'll be able to go and settle in andI'll be very excited to go see Candyman a second time. The whole time, my brain was just racing ahead, trying to figure out what was going to happen. Now that I know the whole story from beginning to end, I'll be able to go and settle in and let the movie speak to me in different ways. Expand
12 of 17 users found this helpful125
All this user's reviews
7
GLADIADORAug 30, 2021
Um bom terror, uma continuação com varias reverencias ao primeiro filme de 1992 e que deixa um final aberto pra uma possivel sequência
9 of 13 users found this helpful94
All this user's reviews
0
imthenoobMay 31, 2022
A totally unnecessary remake that beats you over the head with social commentary on racial issues while making no genuine comment on it whatsoever. It's an utter waste of 90 minutes and it pales in comparison to the original.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
bfoore90Jan 27, 2022
Saw this for the first time recently, follows up with the original quite well.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
2
CajaOct 2, 2021
No puedo tomar en serio las críticas positiva que ha tenido este filme contradictorio.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
1
Moviectricico69Nov 5, 2021
The story about candyMan was/is about discrimination...but to destory such a good Horror classic the way this director did....OMG WHY!! TOOOOOO PoLITICAL!!! not worth watching it...watch it for free watch it on a plane make your friend pay itThe story about candyMan was/is about discrimination...but to destory such a good Horror classic the way this director did....OMG WHY!! TOOOOOO PoLITICAL!!! not worth watching it...watch it for free watch it on a plane make your friend pay it for you!! not worth it...just watch the originals and forget this trash Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
0
Jwalker3521Jan 10, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Basically just an hour and a half political rant. Definitely does not qualify as a horror film. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
1
mrfutbol107Sep 2, 2021
Waste of an hour and a half. If you are going to watch a scary movie with a dumb story the entertainment comes from the scares. This movie is not scary, the jump scares boil down to the movie getting quiet for a second and then a loudWaste of an hour and a half. If you are going to watch a scary movie with a dumb story the entertainment comes from the scares. This movie is not scary, the jump scares boil down to the movie getting quiet for a second and then a loud unnatural sound effect. For an example, in the beginning they transition a scene with a loud unnatural snapping noise because the main character steps on a stick in the next scene. In scenes where there could be scares and the candyman is killing people they decide not to show it. This movie felt more like an excuse to tell people “gentrification is bad, white people are racist, cops are bad.” I would give it a zero but I did like some of the cinematography in a couple scenes. Expand
9 of 14 users found this helpful95
All this user's reviews
2
BubberSep 20, 2021
Not recommended, it's a terrible movie. It's hard to say what they were trying to achieve, maybe pushing some woke ideas, but none of it worked. It's a mess.
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
8
AREVALOAREVALOAug 28, 2021
See the original 1992 Candyman movie before seeing this one. It makes it a lot more enjoyable and understandable watching this sequel.
12 of 19 users found this helpful127
All this user's reviews
2
PuG_805Sep 18, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Very disappointed in this movie.The writing and pacing was all over the place leaving the viewer say “wait…whose that?” “When/how did that happen?” “Why doesnt the character do this?” “Why didnt he/she die?”. Ill give examples of some of these issues so spoiler alert: in one scene the characters are in an art gallery and the camera focuses in on a random stranger and then pans away and it leaves you saying “wait who was that?”(character dies in a later scene and thats it) in that same gallery scene the main character is showing his art piece then in the very next camera cut he is drunk and acting like a douche to some characters we don’t recognize…When did he get drunk? Who is that guy he hates? Now the movie is very clear saying that if u say “Candyman” 5 times u SHOULD die. In one scene 5 schoolgirls say Candyman 5 times in a restroom and end up being killed, but 1 girl(she is a 6th girl that was in a stall) doesnt take part in the ritual and only witnesses the deaths. Makes sense cuz she didnt say it right? Well in the final scene one of the main characters is in police custody and to escape(revenge?) she says Candyman 5 times but the Candyman only kills the cops? Wait what??? After analyzing all the killings the Candyman did, I noticed the people killed where white people(rightfully so since they did the ritual right?)but even if they didn’t do the ritual they died and if a black person does the ritual they live and the white people still die… The movie did have some cool jump scares(the elevator one was cool) and some of the killings were gruesome, but thats is about it(good acting tho!)The movie fails in everything else(writing, character development, consistency, satisfying ending.) Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
8
racetraderAug 30, 2021
Great movie, worthy sequel to the original. Some real haters in the review section here. Will watch again
13 of 21 users found this helpful138
All this user's reviews
9
yellowpensorezSep 27, 2021
Из немногих фильмов ужасов этого года, которые стоит посмотреть.
Настоятельно рекомендуется.
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
9
turymansAug 30, 2021
Great movie. The bad comments are generally from red necks who resent the racial issue in movies. It is a current issue, face it.
10 of 17 users found this helpful107
All this user's reviews
8
slurpuffxAug 27, 2021
Filme muito bom! Bem dirigido, roteiro competente com uma mensagem necessária, o elenco é ótimo em atuações, recomendo..
14 of 24 users found this helpful1410
All this user's reviews
8
Pedro350Sep 3, 2021
Sabia que esta película iba a estar buenísima cuando descubrí que Jordan Peele era el guionista de la misma.
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
0
DarkzetaSep 17, 2021
Absolute filth to the candyman franchise with your typical reboot with a political agenda. Complete trash of a film.
8 of 14 users found this helpful86
All this user's reviews
0
ThwompthingSep 16, 2021
The only people giving this trash positive scores are those who don't care about seeing anti-white rhetoric the entire time. This film is a political cesspool of wokeness. It has no place in this movie, and it is CONSTANTLY ripping on whiteThe only people giving this trash positive scores are those who don't care about seeing anti-white rhetoric the entire time. This film is a political cesspool of wokeness. It has no place in this movie, and it is CONSTANTLY ripping on white people. Cannot believe this has a higher critic score than the first movie. Looks like critics are all "woke" now. What a bunch of deuches. Pass on this garbage, unless you like your movies filled to the brim with black victimization and anti-white themes. Expand
8 of 14 users found this helpful86
All this user's reviews
7
BeardedYodaAug 29, 2021
Candyman is a fairly good thriller/ horror film that definitely pays homage to the original 1992 film in many ways. However, the problems with Candyman start to show near the end of the film as the plot gets fairly confusing at that point.Candyman is a fairly good thriller/ horror film that definitely pays homage to the original 1992 film in many ways. However, the problems with Candyman start to show near the end of the film as the plot gets fairly confusing at that point. Also this movie is very short, far shorter than I thought it would be. Another twenty minutes of plot would have been a reasonable addition, and maybe could have cleared up some of the confusing parts at the end of the film. Expand
9 of 16 users found this helpful97
All this user's reviews
2
Darrenblack35Sep 12, 2021
This movie started off extremely slow and was weighed down with way too much exposition.
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
10
Manny90210Sep 2, 2021
Amazing movie! Loved every bit of it. Glad it was not whitewashed. I'm over these white washed movies stolen from other ethnic groups. More movies like this.
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
9
jorgeperalta00Sep 15, 2021
Candyman is a movie that respects the essence of the character very well.
Also, it is much better than those two horrible sequels that the saga had.
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
1
dunnyoneAug 30, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No.

No. No.

No!

This movie is terrible. The entire time I was watching the clock going, 'when is the horror supposed to start?'- in the LAST 5 MINUTES the film tries its best to show us its take on horror and it's pathetic. The bee face CGI is bad, and the nonsense Candyman spouts is laughable. The kills are mostly done off-screen so, why even bother filming them? If the director is so against showing gore, just cover it up with a fluffy teddy bear or pixilation - just don't insult the audience with these 'artistic' shots.

The film spends sooooooo much time trying to develop other characters but for what reason? There is no character development, only a bunch of woke morons spouting junk. The main character himself is just practically a caveman when it comes to acting. The acting overall is terrible and the plot is... I have no idea why anyone did what they did quite frankly. But the biggest insult is how it treats the first film as a sort of stepping stone for this one. If you're going to turn the Candyman into fictional mythos for a sort-of sequel then sure, but don't retroactively ruin the first film with your woke rubbish. The first Candyman was scary, well acted and interesting. Tony Todd was an insanely cool Candyman in 1992, but 2021 Candyman is just a chad with a hook. If you've read the subtle clues in my review, then you can tell that this film is GARBAGE. Avoid don't bother, especially if you loved the first film.
Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
2
agpearsonAug 29, 2021
Loved the 1992 version, but was left utterly disappointed when the credits started rolling here. Yet another respected Hollywood property blighted! This was a total miss and I think Universal need to sharpen their quality control before greenLoved the 1992 version, but was left utterly disappointed when the credits started rolling here. Yet another respected Hollywood property blighted! This was a total miss and I think Universal need to sharpen their quality control before green lighting films so underbaked in the future. Seems to be critically well received which I’m also surprised at. Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
2
TerminatorFanAug 28, 2021
While it was interesting to see the tie-ins with the original movie and the return of certain characters, the writing as a whole ended up being a convoluted mess (including heavy-handed "social commentary" that was ridiculously over the top)While it was interesting to see the tie-ins with the original movie and the return of certain characters, the writing as a whole ended up being a convoluted mess (including heavy-handed "social commentary" that was ridiculously over the top) that fundamentally disrespects the original film. Tony Todd is only in here for like ... two seconds and has one line. That's it. Blehhhh Expand
10 of 19 users found this helpful109
All this user's reviews
0
Barney2020Aug 29, 2021
Possibly the worst movie I have seen people even got up and left mid movie in the cinema I was in
11 of 21 users found this helpful1110
All this user's reviews
1
ChrisM1979Aug 27, 2021
The only thing I can think is we are going through a period where the studios are holding back on a lot of the better movies and releasing movies that were meant originally for streaming. I'm really surprised this was in the theaters. I justThe only thing I can think is we are going through a period where the studios are holding back on a lot of the better movies and releasing movies that were meant originally for streaming. I'm really surprised this was in the theaters. I just was not scary at all. I really liked the original and this one looked like it might be cool from the trailer. But I just didn't like it at all. Very disappointed. Expand
11 of 21 users found this helpful1110
All this user's reviews
0
base_dAug 27, 2021
Absolute filth to the candyman franchise with your typical reboot with a political agenda. Complete trash of a film.
14 of 28 users found this helpful1414
All this user's reviews
3
mateuszlAug 27, 2021
It's bad, I don't recall when was the last time I was so disappointed in the cinema. I'm super surprised that there is only 1 (one!) negative critic review.

Trailer really set the expectations with the visuals and cool soundtrack. And there
It's bad, I don't recall when was the last time I was so disappointed in the cinema. I'm super surprised that there is only 1 (one!) negative critic review.

Trailer really set the expectations with the visuals and cool soundtrack. And there are some nice shots and ideas but in general there is no suspense whatsoever and the social commentary is super naive and taking the whole thing to the extreme.
It appears that Candyman(or -men actually) is only killing white people (which are all villains in this movie) and he's actually used as a weapon in some crazy revenge strategy.

There are some cool, creative ideas, like few death scenes, but they are all very poorly executed with wrong pacing and soundtrack.
Expand
14 of 28 users found this helpful1414
All this user's reviews
3
mvrtsAug 31, 2021
Peele's first miss for me. Your typical SJW movie executed poorly imo. There isn't much of a story just the "boogeyman" all throughout. It can be summed up as your girlfriend or wife rambling on about something, in the middle of it you'rePeele's first miss for me. Your typical SJW movie executed poorly imo. There isn't much of a story just the "boogeyman" all throughout. It can be summed up as your girlfriend or wife rambling on about something, in the middle of it you're like oh she might have a point, but by the time she's done you realize she isn't really saying anything Expand
9 of 18 users found this helpful99
All this user's reviews
0
crankyermaSep 18, 2021
Say "Dumb, hamfisted, postmodernist propaganda" five times in a row and this film will appear.
8 of 16 users found this helpful88
All this user's reviews
3
entitetSep 21, 2021
It's pretty clear by now that Jordan Peele have a gigantic chip on his shoulder when it comes to white people (which is kinda funny since he's half white) and he's never subtle with his feelings in his movies. In Candyman it's more blatantIt's pretty clear by now that Jordan Peele have a gigantic chip on his shoulder when it comes to white people (which is kinda funny since he's half white) and he's never subtle with his feelings in his movies. In Candyman it's more blatant than ever; all white people (and white cops) are cruel, stupid, mean and evil, so kill all the white people!
I don't know if Peele gets off on being "provocative" in his blatant unwitty ways and goes "Haha! Look at all these b*tthurt angry racists react!" - but either way, it's not clever and it's probably more counterproductive than helpful. His "anti racism" is equivalent to pushing a dogs face in filth, until the dog, one day, bites back. It's fueling dislike, hate and anger in both ways, instead of handling problems and bringing people together.

But besides this, Candyman is a strange "horror" movie. The fact that the director chose to play down and make most of the killings happen off screen, makes it play out more like a quite boring flatlining tv drama, instead of an intense horror movie and the story isn't intriguing or good enough to stand on it's own legs, without the "flavour" of gore and suspense.
The acting and cinematography was pretty decent tho and kudos for not using tons of jump scares ...but not kudos for removing scares totally.
Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
9
GianPierreSep 23, 2021
For me, Candyman is one of the best horror movies that Jordan Peele could produce.
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
0
GoreministerNov 9, 2021
Why do they keep on remaking already good movies and fail so miserable? Seriously? I felt asleep...
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
7
LumdogSep 19, 2021
It's a solid film. The cinematography and artistic camera shots involving Candyman and the mirrors is very creative. The Candyman himself is a terrifying and haunting protagonist. The story does get muddled in the third act and certain thingsIt's a solid film. The cinematography and artistic camera shots involving Candyman and the mirrors is very creative. The Candyman himself is a terrifying and haunting protagonist. The story does get muddled in the third act and certain things could've been fleshed out an explained more. The film sends a powerful message about racism, however I wish they would've been more subtle about it. It just keeps you hitting over the head. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
8
edelgardvonhresSep 18, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A phenomenal film by writer director Nia DaCosta in her second directorial role, and a wonderful commentary on the society of today. Candyman (2021) is a direct sequel to the original film, deciding to focus it's story on another tragic figure that bears the name of Candyman. Yahya Abdul-Mateen II plays the role of Anthony McCoy, a struggling artist looking for his next big inspiration which he finds in the legend of Candyman. His performance is wonderfully executed and he puts a thorough amount of passion into the role and makes it stand out as a good enough contender to Virginia Madsen's role as Helen Lyle in the original. The story, while slow to start, speaks volumes and is masterfully told through brilliant scenes and direction. I highly recommend this movie, even if it isn't a masterpiece it is certainly a horror sequel worth watching, especially if you adore the themes and message of what Candyman truly represents, and I hope you enjoyed this movie and it's message just as much as I did. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
7
PanchogulNov 23, 2021
Una secuela directa de la original de 1992 a la cual no supera, pero si lo hace con las películas que salieron después.

Aquí la historia se enfoca más en la mitología de Candyman, al menos eso es lo que aparenta, los asesinatos pasan
Una secuela directa de la original de 1992 a la cual no supera, pero si lo hace con las películas que salieron después.

Aquí la historia se enfoca más en la mitología de Candyman, al menos eso es lo que aparenta, los asesinatos pasan relativamente a un segundo plano Para desarrollar mejor el argumento, empieza bien pero después todo se torna errático y todo termina de manera muy apresurada dejando todo a medias. Entretiene, pero en cuanto a narrativa deja un poco que desear. Como punto adicional pienso que la banda sonora fue un aspecto más que destacable, a la altura del producto original.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
M300Jul 12, 2022
Sadly the movie is portraying modern political views rather than a movie based on the original concept.

Go to the Wikipedia page for the 1992 movie and see how it was last edited this July and has been edited to be in line with the remake
Sadly the movie is portraying modern political views rather than a movie based on the original concept.

Go to the Wikipedia page for the 1992 movie and see how it was last edited this July and has been edited to be in line with the remake and todays political agendas.

On point of the original movie, the movie had nothing to do with race in it, at the 15 minute mark the entrance into investigating deeper with Helen and Bernie (The chick with the blue sweater who tricks Helen into thinking there is a person in the vacant apartment behind their medicine cabinet).

The following; "Gangs hold this place hostage" - Gangs in the Carbrini-Green area. As Bernie points out they both look like cops. Has no racial tie and the only agenda is to not get attacked by said gangs.

From 16:57 into the movie play time, the scene with both in the car on their way is where The mention of gangs and them looking like police happens, further on from this it is also mentioned that Helen is brave and see's no danger in being who she is even when given words of wisdom, she gets beaten in a toilet by thugs and a wannabe Candyman.

The remake is a terrible film, a master peice and great study on the lowering of human intelligence and how anyone with a narrative regardless of truth or not can hold power over people, sad and pathetic. Racist movie with ulterior motives, get help.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
3
GumdropMar 1, 2023
This had the potential to be really good but ultimately, it fails to do what the original did. You see the first one managed to create an atmosphere you just can't find in a horror movie and definitely can't find in this one. It was scary andThis had the potential to be really good but ultimately, it fails to do what the original did. You see the first one managed to create an atmosphere you just can't find in a horror movie and definitely can't find in this one. It was scary and by the end, you really did buy into the narrative. That maybe, just maybe saying Candyman 5 times, he might just appear.

But what it really did well was to tell the same story that this one tries (and fails) to tell. It successfuly handled the deeper themes. And it did it without forcing them down your throat. It did a great job conveying the message and still being a really great horror movie. This sequel isn't a particularly good horror movie. Yes, it's very well scored and shot. But that's about all it has going for it. There's nothing you haven't already seen 1000 times in any other horror/slasher. You see, the reason is that it's not a horror movie. It's a political statement masquerading as a horror movie.
More importantly. In an effort to push its narrative, it neglects the story and the characters. I see people commenting that the negative reviews are only because we don't get the "themes". Well we get it now and we got it with the original. The difference is that the original handled it tactfully and wove it into the story and the horror. It still successfully conveyed its message. More so than this one. Watching this sequel is like constantly being hit with a brick. WHITE BAD. WHITE BAD. WHITE BAD.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
BigEggsKitchenAug 28, 2021
Left halfway through. The CGI is unbearably bad, kills are uninspired, dialogue is atrocious
11 of 23 users found this helpful1112
All this user's reviews
2
EquationAug 29, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Having come back home from the cinema, all I can say is I'm disappointed... This film was slow, didn't really have much to say about itself apart from the good old "white person is bad" (cheers Jordan Peale, you seem to love this ehh) - This seemed to have no direction, I can see how it's been linked with the first films through the backstory that is shown, I liked that part but wow, was this film boring! I was sat waiting for the tension to build up but it never got there. I was excited to see Tony Todd reappear again as I knew he would be in it but he just makes an appearance in the last 20 seconds of the film (maybe CGI) as if to show that a sequel would be coming. The ending is so unsatisfying, no conclusion to tie up this one film but just a hint that there will be another film to conclude. I've never been this disappointed with a cinema trip in a long time. Expand
10 of 21 users found this helpful1011
All this user's reviews
2
ArbiterMediaAug 28, 2021
Candyman isn't even the main villain...gentrification is. This was done in the original film but correctly just as atmosphere and undertones, it didn't have to he the main character.
10 of 21 users found this helpful1011
All this user's reviews
0
mickrussomAug 27, 2021
why bother calling this candyman. it started out possibly ok - there was a bunch of threads and callbacks etc but then by the ending they left out plot threads and then went full hamfisted mode. its a terrible piece of hot garbage. this moviewhy bother calling this candyman. it started out possibly ok - there was a bunch of threads and callbacks etc but then by the ending they left out plot threads and then went full hamfisted mode. its a terrible piece of hot garbage. this movie has a "message" but ruins the story because of the message. Expand
11 of 24 users found this helpful1113
All this user's reviews
0
747OMGAug 27, 2021
It's a longer and **** version of the original. The story of Candyman is actually more plausible than the asinine social commentary that's more obnoxious than meat hook up your butt.

Upside: If you like art that can only be described as
It's a longer and **** version of the original. The story of Candyman is actually more plausible than the asinine social commentary that's more obnoxious than meat hook up your butt.

Upside: If you like art that can only be described as "ugly, formless, meaningless crap" it's abundant in this film.
Expand
11 of 24 users found this helpful1113
All this user's reviews
0
craiger13Aug 27, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have never been so angry. Candyman is my favorite horror movie. This film is not Candyman. It is political propaganda to show that police officers are evil. The climax of the film tried to make the murder of officers justified, which is wrong whether they are guilty or not. It was a gross misrepresentation of officers, trying to make it seem like they are all bad. The message was showing that the current narrative is that officers are innocent, when in reality officers always get the short end of the stick. The media’s message is ALWAYS that the officer is in the wrong, whether they are or not. Candyman’s final words were to tell everyone, so I did. DO NOT give your money to this movie! Do not allow hollywood to spread this propaganda! Expand
9 of 20 users found this helpful911
All this user's reviews
8
RichardSayreSep 30, 2021
Nia Dacosta's CANDYMAN is a frighteningly relevant, creepy, and damn beautiful movie to look at. Co-written by Jordan Peele, this updated look at the mythology of Candyman and what truly makes the beast is a splendid, gory good time.Nia Dacosta's CANDYMAN is a frighteningly relevant, creepy, and damn beautiful movie to look at. Co-written by Jordan Peele, this updated look at the mythology of Candyman and what truly makes the beast is a splendid, gory good time. Featuring a powerhouse performance from Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, the film does a number of things right, yet is a tad too short and leaves you wanting. The direction and cinematography is about as gorgeous as it gets with technically impressive shots of reflections and mirrors that fill you with dread. One of the best films of 2021. Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
10
whitepanther420Sep 26, 2021
So many angry incels and boomers on here that can't handle a story being told about the struggles of a disenfranchised population. The terrorization of black communities is American history. Your feelings about facts will never change them.So many angry incels and boomers on here that can't handle a story being told about the struggles of a disenfranchised population. The terrorization of black communities is American history. Your feelings about facts will never change them. Luckily the people smart enough to something more complex that a comment on the internet will continue to tell stories like this one whether or not you fascists want them to. Smarter people than you will continue to decide the content of great art while your kind get left by the wayside. You will be a little redhatted footnote in the pages of history that no one bothers to read. Farewell troglodytes, culture will be moving forward without you.
P.s. Awesome movie. Cinematography, story, acting, all great. Lots of hidden meaning in the visual effects. Deserves at least 2 watches.
Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
1
zylerAug 28, 2021
Wasn't scary or interesting. Jumpscares are often rather boring form of fear for me. Story of it felt half done that was thought up and wrote down quickly, but at least it felt like a sequel I guess.
7 of 16 users found this helpful79
All this user's reviews
2
assafosSep 8, 2021
Boring, stupid story. At some point I didn't even care to understand what's going on. This film lies with the lowest ranking horror films ever, if it can even be called "Horror"
7 of 16 users found this helpful79
All this user's reviews
3
DominatusDec 28, 2021
Clear far-left propaganda from start to finish. Every white character is painted as evil and racist etc. Ridiculous portrayal of the police as a force that just goes around killing people for the hell of it. Even investing money into a poorClear far-left propaganda from start to finish. Every white character is painted as evil and racist etc. Ridiculous portrayal of the police as a force that just goes around killing people for the hell of it. Even investing money into a poor area in order to raise living standards for it's citizens is portrayed as an evil plot by white people in this film. I'm Latin and even I just couldn't watching this blatant and totally inaccurate propaganda. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
4
rickxy007Sep 5, 2021
Godd acting, good ambience, tangential horror.
Too many "say my name", "white people this", "white people that".

Could have been great, but it is nothing but a pamphlet movie screaming mottos and ideologies.

Unfortunately wasted opportunity...
7 of 17 users found this helpful710
All this user's reviews
9
AdamWalker-Sep 26, 2021
After seeing so many bad horror movies... I finally find something good in this genre.
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
10
OrijantmapleSep 29, 2021
Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good!
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
2
MtbbettySep 10, 2021
It was OK but not as good as I was hoping it would be. Entertaining but I lost interest. Very bloody and gory. I don’t find that scary just gross. I was hoping for something new but like Friday the 13th, Halloween, nightmare on Elm Street…It was OK but not as good as I was hoping it would be. Entertaining but I lost interest. Very bloody and gory. I don’t find that scary just gross. I was hoping for something new but like Friday the 13th, Halloween, nightmare on Elm Street… very weak storyline cutting people up lots of blood and gore, blah Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
4
MattyiceAug 27, 2021
While Candyman is well-shot, well-acted, its hand-puppet scenes are very well done, and its themes of art and artistic approach are great, it disappoints as an overall picture in the end. One of the biggest issues is it truly isn't scary orWhile Candyman is well-shot, well-acted, its hand-puppet scenes are very well done, and its themes of art and artistic approach are great, it disappoints as an overall picture in the end. One of the biggest issues is it truly isn't scary or intense in any way beyond the body horror shown on occasion. Furthermore, its gentrification themes feel very forced and are done with absolutely no subtlety or nuance whatsoever, making it feel rather shallow and preachy relative to the original film. Finally, its entire third act is really poorly written, leaving viewers cheated and bored in the end. It has merits in its direction and design, but its actual substance leaves a lot to be desired and could have been done way better with more nuance and better writing. Expand
6 of 16 users found this helpful610
All this user's reviews
3
MetacriticOnurSep 18, 2021
bad
[ bad ]

adjective, worse, worst;(Slang) bad·der, bad·dest for 36.
not good in any manner or degree.
6 of 16 users found this helpful610
All this user's reviews
6
jamessAug 29, 2021
It seems as though Jordan Peele and company saw the recent Halloween and thought we can do the same with Candyman. Acknowledging the original (ignoring the lesser sequels), with callbacks and characters from the original, while creating aIt seems as though Jordan Peele and company saw the recent Halloween and thought we can do the same with Candyman. Acknowledging the original (ignoring the lesser sequels), with callbacks and characters from the original, while creating a continuation of the mythology. And even though the release was delayed by covid, it seems rushed. Very stylishly shot and well acted and directed, it would actually IMO benefit from a little longer running time. Good, when it could have been great. Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
6
moviemitch96Aug 29, 2021
Here we have a reboot/remake of sorts of the 1992 supernatural slasher flick of the same name that sees him haunting and cursing anyone who dare mention his name 5 times in the mirror. Modernized and updated by director Nia DaCosta and JordanHere we have a reboot/remake of sorts of the 1992 supernatural slasher flick of the same name that sees him haunting and cursing anyone who dare mention his name 5 times in the mirror. Modernized and updated by director Nia DaCosta and Jordan Peele serving as one of the writers, there's some good slasher fun to be had here at times, but the film also delves into its fair share of predictable horror tropes and cliches as well. The film's third act also feels rushed and somewhat satisfying, but overall, fans of the original may appreciate some of the new ideas here, and visually, it's actually somewhat cool at times. Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
1
Antp1212Sep 12, 2021
This film was horrible, for a horror movie in general and also in comparison to Peele's previous work. Also odd that he chooses to use his platform to choose to murder all the white people in the movie. Plus has a complete misunderstanding ofThis film was horrible, for a horror movie in general and also in comparison to Peele's previous work. Also odd that he chooses to use his platform to choose to murder all the white people in the movie. Plus has a complete misunderstanding of gentrification, as again, he tried to push that agenda in the film as well. Expand
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
0
MichaelPraytorAug 28, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Less than halfway through the movie it's impossible to not know how it ends unless you lack basic lateral thinking abilities. The ending explicitly stated that Candyman only murders guilty white folk (girls bullying a black girl, racist cops) except 20 minutes before the end they shoe horned in a 30 second clip of Candyman murdering two little black girls so the entire movie isn't about killing whitey. So retarded. Wouldn't be surprised if this movie was produced by BLM. Expand
8 of 23 users found this helpful815
All this user's reviews
7
JLauOct 5, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The baby from the first film has grown up to be an artist, learns about the story of Helen and the Candyman and then makes art based on the story before slowly turning into Candyman himself and killing some annoying art people and white police officers. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
arlethclarineSep 30, 2021
This new movie of this horror character is much better than the first one that started everything.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
Scorpion28Feb 28, 2022
Absolute garbage. I watched 10 minutes of this before recognising what was going on and sadly it didn't let up. As a fan of the original movie, it's a shame to see this franchise (as well as so many other films) just becoming woke nonsenseAbsolute garbage. I watched 10 minutes of this before recognising what was going on and sadly it didn't let up. As a fan of the original movie, it's a shame to see this franchise (as well as so many other films) just becoming woke nonsense that doesn't reflect reality at all. How about focusing on writing a good story rather than preaching poorly researched racial assumptions? You might just end up with a good movie that way... Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
3
snorkissSep 16, 2021
The biggest horror of this sequel/ remake of Candyman isn't the hollow racial politics but the fact that it just isn't very scary - 3 stars
5 of 17 users found this helpful512
All this user's reviews
4
TheQuietGamerAug 28, 2021
For 29 years Candyman fans have been waiting for the 1992 classic to get the sequel it deserves. It looked that was finally about to happen after all these years thanks to Nia DaCosta and, to a lesser extent, Jordan Peele. The socialFor 29 years Candyman fans have been waiting for the 1992 classic to get the sequel it deserves. It looked that was finally about to happen after all these years thanks to Nia DaCosta and, to a lesser extent, Jordan Peele. The social commentary that was largely absent in Farewell to the Flesh and Day of the Dead would be returning to add some much needed depth back into the mix without the white influence that, while well-meaning back then, would not have been met so warmly today, and maybe with the same kind of creative chills that made Get Out and Us so exciting. Unfortunately the wait goes on as despite the appearance of some incredible ideas this 2021 continuation fall short of its own lofty ambitions by backing itself into a self-defeating corner.

The issue is that it's actively trying to be a sequel. It's clear that DaCosta and crew want to transform the titular character from the ghost of one African-American's suffering into an instrument of black vengeance. He's no longer just Daniel Robitaille. He's Eric Garner. He's Tamir Rice. He's George Floyd. At least until he's not anymore and becomes Daniel Robitaille again in an ending that contradicts everything the film had spent so long trying to set up and completely wastes Tony Todd anyways.

This problem arises because in an effort to correct the perspective of its predecessor that came from it being a product of its time, they incorrectly wrote themselves into a position where he basically HAD to come back. A large portion of the running-time is dedicated to establishing connections and ties to the original, so we're constantly reminded of who the Candyman was there and eagerly await his return. Something that makes the appearance of this "Sherman" dude in his place rather irritating. It makes sense from a thematic standpoint, but man is it unfilling. Worse is that they could have gotten away with it had they not kept referencing what Bernard Rose had created prior. They made it so the past hangs over everything like an oppressive cloud that kills any enthusiasm for what's actually here when they should have gone the full reboot route and given their own ideas room to breathe.

Speaking of room to breathe, this is one of those rare cases where a longer runtime would have been a good thing. A core component of the plot is the main character's gradual physical and mental descent into becoming someone (or something) in a way he doesn't seem fully aware of. Only it's not so gradual at all. He just seems to go insane from the moment he says the summoning words into a reflective surface, which feels unnatural and rushed. It's a cool body horror element that also never really comes into fruition.

In fact, the horror side as a whole fails to deliver. DaCosta relies on cheap gore rather than truly effective frights to get the job done, kind of missing the point when it comes to what made the first Candyman scary. Most of the time though it's too caught up in its own dull plotting, unresolved threads, and hollow characters making the whole thing a bit of a bore. All of which might have been acceptable had there have been a satisfying payoff, but for the aforementioned reasons it shoots itself in the foot preventing that from being a possibility.

While this may be a movie with a lot of ideas that don't come together, it only crumbles under the weight of one. It should have unshackled itself from the past entirely. Never mentioned Helen Lyle or brought back Todd for the few brief seconds he's in here. As by placing itself in the shadow of that earlier work, it has put certain expectations on itself that it feels the need to fulfill just as much as the audience needs to see them be fulfilled. This is not only a shame, but frustrating as well as it keeps the film's own bold and compelling reinvention of the property from ever taking hold when you can totally see how it could have succeeded if they hadn't of attempted the fruitless balancing act of fidelity and emendation. If there's one thing its flawed conclusion is good for though it's that it leaves the door still open for the possibility of this franchise not just being a one hit wonder at some point in the future, how ever delusional that hope may be. As of right now though, many will be left wanting for a while longer yet. This 2021 version, promising though it was and brilliant in brief instances, is (accidentally) counterproductive in the worst way.

4.9/10
Expand
5 of 18 users found this helpful513
All this user's reviews
2
Zack2981Aug 30, 2021
I was genuinely excited to see a slasher/horror movie with an all African American cast, director, and writer. I didn't know it was just going to be about how much white people suck. Not that racial relations aren't important to discuss,I was genuinely excited to see a slasher/horror movie with an all African American cast, director, and writer. I didn't know it was just going to be about how much white people suck. Not that racial relations aren't important to discuss, but... I dunno, this seemed like it was far more interested in that than making a good horror film. To be clear, I am all for diversity and inclusion. But I'm not sure this is the way to do it.

Looked good, acting was good all around.
Expand
4 of 15 users found this helpful411
All this user's reviews
2
samspade23Aug 30, 2021
Aside from the woke bull$hit, it's not scary, has a stupid story, and an overall boring film. The original was such a scary masterpiece and this abomination is a big slap in the face.
4 of 15 users found this helpful411
All this user's reviews
1
LilkingnoarSep 23, 2021
One of the worst movies I have ever seen. Acting is mediocre and Candyman himself is one of the most boring killers I've ever seen. Story is so damn simple that even a 5 year old can understand what is happening. The kills are almost all theOne of the worst movies I have ever seen. Acting is mediocre and Candyman himself is one of the most boring killers I've ever seen. Story is so damn simple that even a 5 year old can understand what is happening. The kills are almost all the same and he never does something original. Score: 1.5/10 Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
3
Silures_CeltSep 19, 2021
Granted Candyman is a movie based on racial elements but this is a 'horror' movie that trades the horror for political commentary, it feels forced and poorly written, the characters were also poorly written and unlikable and the ending wasGranted Candyman is a movie based on racial elements but this is a 'horror' movie that trades the horror for political commentary, it feels forced and poorly written, the characters were also poorly written and unlikable and the ending was also really poor. The story was a convoluted mess, it should have concentrated on being its own thing rather than trying to tie into the original because this movie fails at both being a remake or a sequel, it's clear it doesn't know what it was meant to be either and Anthony and Ann-Marie should have been left out entirely. On the positive side, the cinematography was very good and well shot, the acting was good and the script was decent for the most part.
In summary, this movie failed in my opinion, I just wish movies would return to telling a good story rather than pandering and forcing political narratives, I think many people are getting sick of it now, it's hurting franchises and future movies.
Expand
6 of 30 users found this helpful624
All this user's reviews
5
Rebecca31Aug 31, 2021
Candyman 2021 is a direct sequel to the original 1992 Candyman and ignores the other sequels. It gives enough backstory to introduce a new audience and it’s not essential to have seen the original beforehand. I had high expectations, butCandyman 2021 is a direct sequel to the original 1992 Candyman and ignores the other sequels. It gives enough backstory to introduce a new audience and it’s not essential to have seen the original beforehand. I had high expectations, but unfortunately Candyman did not meet them.

Set in present day Chicago, years after the last of the Cabrini Green towers was torn down. Anthony McCoy’s (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II) career as an artist has been waning but he becomes reinvigorated after an encounter with a Cabrini Green resident who retells the horrific story behind the Candyman. Anthony begins to explore the ghost story of the supernatural killer who can be summoned by anyone daring to say his name five times while staring into a mirror. The more Anthony delves into the true story behind the Candyman he unwittingly opens a door, and unleashes a terrifying new wave of violence and horror. Candyman, directed by Nia DaCosta was one of the few horrors I was looking forward to this year. I’m sure DaCosta will go on to make some great movies, because despite my disappointment it’s well directed and has a lot of nice, artistic visuals. It starts off promising, creates the right atmosphere and keeps a similar tone to the original Candyman. I really did like the first half but unfortunately the second half morphs into a different movie and completely falls apart. It felt like those cheap generic horrors that I’ve seen again and again. There are far too many scenes of people standing in front of mirrors saying Candyman over and over again. I thought the trailer was overdoing it but that was just a taste of what the film has instore for you. One scene specifically stands out, set in a high school, and appeared so out of place it honestly feels like it was added in from another movie altogether. I felt Candyman was two movies forced together, a great horror spliced with a really bad one.

Perhaps my expectations was too high but this really should have been a lot better, I know a lot of film fans will be seeing this one and most likely it will do very well at the box office. Having said that, it might be best to lower the expectations in order for those of you who haven’t seen it to enjoy it a lot more than I did. Recommended for fans of the Candyman franchise, but honestly you’d be better off watching the 1992 version.
Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
8
egoBorderAug 16, 2022
Truly surprised by the low scores because outside of a few flaws I found this movie to be very solid. There's a few moments when it almost lost me but won me back every time and sank its hooks deeper. Highly recommend it
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
6
bertobellamyAug 29, 2021
There's some good photography in here, and the social premise is not that bad — you know what you're getting into when you walk into something involving Jordan Peele —. The problem is that there are too many ideas, and I really don't get whatThere's some good photography in here, and the social premise is not that bad — you know what you're getting into when you walk into something involving Jordan Peele —. The problem is that there are too many ideas, and I really don't get what Nia DaCosta and Peele were trying to do with the character. It also doesn't help that the themes are in-your-face all the time. Some subtlety could've helped a little. And, of course, the last act is the worst part of the film; I liked the gory scenes, but the ending is very underwhelming and confusing. Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
6
dharmaSep 21, 2021
I was anticipating this flick as I was a big fan of the original. Yet despite its stellar casts, the film failed to create a terrifying moment and ended up being a pseudo commentary on social injustice. Not a good mark on Peele's recentI was anticipating this flick as I was a big fan of the original. Yet despite its stellar casts, the film failed to create a terrifying moment and ended up being a pseudo commentary on social injustice. Not a good mark on Peele's recent resume, who act as its producer and writer. Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
5
ozymandias79Sep 19, 2021
I didn't even realise Candyman only kills white people in this movie until I read the reviews here. Imagine the uproar at a horror villain that only killed black people. Apart from all this BS, its a super average movie with meh atmosphere.I didn't even realise Candyman only kills white people in this movie until I read the reviews here. Imagine the uproar at a horror villain that only killed black people. Apart from all this BS, its a super average movie with meh atmosphere. See the original Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
6
Voodoo123Dec 5, 2021
Great cinematography and excellent production quality couldn't save candyman from being more of a dull yet tense buildup to nothing more than your run of the mill gore flick rather than anything truly terrifying or horrific.

Its a shame as i
Great cinematography and excellent production quality couldn't save candyman from being more of a dull yet tense buildup to nothing more than your run of the mill gore flick rather than anything truly terrifying or horrific.

Its a shame as i feel with a slower pacing and more emphasis on an individual death than bombarding us with with multiple kills and backstory from start to end could've been far more impactful. The beginning was also quite slow. Definitely something to watch if you dont mind a very run of the mill horror.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
MattBrady99Dec 1, 2021
Solid acting, great body horror, and fantastic visuals, especially the paper puppets sequence. I like how this movie takes the Candyman legend and makes the point that every generation of racism has its own Candyman tragedy of injustice.Solid acting, great body horror, and fantastic visuals, especially the paper puppets sequence. I like how this movie takes the Candyman legend and makes the point that every generation of racism has its own Candyman tragedy of injustice. Despite saying all that, I found the rest of this movie so forgettable and nowhere near as effective as the 1992 movie. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
JLuis_001Sep 16, 2021
Nia Costa's Candyman didn't turn out to be a remake/reboot as expected. It's actually a sequel/reboot, with a narrative conditioned to the present time. Especially when it comes to police brutality.

I wasn't so sure of my rating because,
Nia Costa's Candyman didn't turn out to be a remake/reboot as expected. It's actually a sequel/reboot, with a narrative conditioned to the present time. Especially when it comes to police brutality.

I wasn't so sure of my rating because, although there are several things that I liked a lot, especially the direction, the nuances, and the tonality of its setting and surroundings, I also couldn't help but notice how thin the story is.
More than anything what could have been explored with its lead character.

I say this, because there's an explanation about his past, but that past is only what causes the character to be tied to Candyman.
There's no real background to him. The motives belong to others.
He only happens to be the catalyst for the events that follow, and that only happens because he was simply looking for inspiration for his art, and he did it in the wrong place.

That seemed like a very poor plot to me, because the character ends up suffering the consequences from which he was initially exempted, and now he also ends up as the doomed spirit.
Now as a vehicle of revenge, and very clearly against whom.

Obviously it's a clear demonstration of the perpetuation of a cycle of violence against black people, but to make the impact more resonant, I need more than the basic idealization of a figure who must now inspire fear in his oppressors.

It's still effective, and even though the horror isn't really there, only in the last part, Candyman stands as a very interesting option for any viewer, and shows that director; Nia DaCosta is more than ready to carve out a more than interesting career.
Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
5
BradMorganSep 5, 2021
A film with too slow a tempo to experience real tension. The final twist is also not convincing. Unfortunately, the film ended up being a disappointment.
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
4
akshatmahajanNov 13, 2021
I enjoyed watching original Candyman and was excited to see it's sequel but I was disappointed. It was neither spooky nor creepy, like the original. This movie had many problems. What I mainly enjoyed about the original was the development ofI enjoyed watching original Candyman and was excited to see it's sequel but I was disappointed. It was neither spooky nor creepy, like the original. This movie had many problems. What I mainly enjoyed about the original was the development of the plot at psychological level which this movie lacked. Performances by all the actors were normal. You cannot feel them. There was also problem with the pacing of the movie. Also, I was unable to understand why in almost every scene, characters were talking anti- white people.

Overall, it was underwhelming to watch and it will be better if you just watch the original
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews