Paramount Pictures | Release Date: October 5, 1961
7.5
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 136 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
108
Mixed:
21
Negative:
7
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
kristelbonillaNov 9, 2015
My romantic rom-com of all time. it is one of my favorite movies ever. Great performances of both Audrey Hepburn and George Peppard, the two had the best chemistry ever seen in cinema
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
KelvinSelimorAug 16, 2022
Breakfast at Tiffany's. The movie you fall in love with. Charming and sweet Audrey Hepburn and handsome and funny George Peppard created a truly beautiful Hollywood couple. For almost two hours, you watch this beautiful and truly picture andBreakfast at Tiffany's. The movie you fall in love with. Charming and sweet Audrey Hepburn and handsome and funny George Peppard created a truly beautiful Hollywood couple. For almost two hours, you watch this beautiful and truly picture and do not want it to end. And the title theme Moon River penetrates the very heart and soul and remains there forever. As for the final scene, it is impossible to shed a tear and smile here. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
Terbo49Jul 4, 2020
A racist, sexist piece of crap. The acting is execrable. Hepburn plays a mannequin but still manages to appear like a painted lump of wood. But casting Mickey Rooney as the ‘hilarious’ Japanese upstairs neighbour (if you think a whiteA racist, sexist piece of crap. The acting is execrable. Hepburn plays a mannequin but still manages to appear like a painted lump of wood. But casting Mickey Rooney as the ‘hilarious’ Japanese upstairs neighbour (if you think a white American saying ‘Miss Gorightry’ is funny - you’re in for a fun time!) is contemptuously evil. A nasty piece of work from the nasty little people. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
Goddessof_BlahMar 17, 2013
An enjoyable film. The film brought NY to love with many iconic places and of course is now a fashion and cult classic. And unlike Pretty Woman it wasn't all sparkly and fairy tale like.

Great performance by both actors. I'm glad they
An enjoyable film. The film brought NY to love with many iconic places and of course is now a fashion and cult classic. And unlike Pretty Woman it wasn't all sparkly and fairy tale like.

Great performance by both actors. I'm glad they didn't use Monroe to portray a call girl. The film required an actress of has plenty of charm, class and is innocent but sophisticated in order for the audience to feel empathy and to avoid it being a gritty underworld overly dramatized fake-arty film. Sex appeal would not work.

By casting Audrey Hepburn one felt empathy for women like her. She gave the film charm, class and warmth. One didn't feel we were watching the life of a acquisitive woman but rather watching the plight of a friend. She gave the character an endearing quality that a sexy star wold not have been able to achieve. I'm also glad that there was some Tinsel Town visibility in the film's ending the actual ending of the book was far too gritty to make it a book worth reading. One doesn't always wish to be presented with the melancholy weakness of human beings. The want to shock and horrify by labeling it "realistic" can also become far too tried and stereotypical. Overall the film is quite sentimental that isn't all hard edge and has some substance. One felt the conclusion that love, even if in a non-glamorous small flat in NY, is preferable to living as a mistress in South America as a rich man's illicit plaything.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
1
DiogoOliveiraDec 15, 2019
Resumindo: é um filme cheio de esteriótipos, onde faz uma crítica que não funciona, colocaram dois atores bonitos, muito bonitos para fazerem caras e bocas e falarem frases de duplo sentido e na maior parte diálogos inteligente que leva emResumindo: é um filme cheio de esteriótipos, onde faz uma crítica que não funciona, colocaram dois atores bonitos, muito bonitos para fazerem caras e bocas e falarem frases de duplo sentido e na maior parte diálogos inteligente que leva em dúvida o devido trabalho de ambos, um romance forçado, uma personagem principal falastrona e um galã ouvinte que bera o ridículo, mas em compensação o figurino e a fotografia estão bem posicionados, bem aconchegante é luxuoso, mas o filme não passa de um pedaço de roteiro mal escrito e cheio de machismo, um filme que não deveria nem concorrer ao Oscar, mas antigamente só bastava ter nome em Hollywood pra concorrer ao Oscar, o filme não desenvolveu bem a personalidade do protagonista masculino, meio que ficou solto no ar o verdadeiro propósito dele, já a personagem feminino e totalmente uma crítica a mulher independente e que busca o luxo, de uma forma machista ele faz um jogo com Telespectadores, alem de ser totalmente fútil e ambiciosa, ,deixando a personagem saturada é muito exibida é muito caricata, uma decepção! Um roteiro preguiçoso​ é muito usado pra filmes sem propósito hoje em dia, lamentável e a palavra mais correta, esperava mais, uma coisa funciona​ bem - Fotografia, Figurino e Química dos personagens, mas o roteiro peca em não aproveita tudo isso, um filme arrastado e monótono, bem abaixo de sua época, Sou apaixonado por filmes com roteiro e atuações ótimas e esse filme não tem nem um dos dois, nem a Audrey Hepburn conseguiu leva o filme a outro patamar, e um filme bem descartável. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
1
johnboonNov 21, 2020
Possibly the worst movie on the Top 100 bucket list. Boring, full of slapstick. Script, acting, direction - all terrible. Don't bother watching.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
GandalfJAug 22, 2009
The racist stereotypes in this movie ruin it. It really isn't all that good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SteveA.Jan 12, 2008
This is a very strange movie, but really quite enjoyable. It's not at all as I expected. Audrey Hepburn plays a "party" (code for call) girl, while her upstairs neighbour (the very cute George Peppard) plays a gigolo...and this unlikely This is a very strange movie, but really quite enjoyable. It's not at all as I expected. Audrey Hepburn plays a "party" (code for call) girl, while her upstairs neighbour (the very cute George Peppard) plays a gigolo...and this unlikely couple stagger towards love through an improbably series of events. Still, the whole thing works, and by the final corn-ball scene in the rain you're hooked and it's quite touching. Everyone talks about this movie as 'classic' and how sophisticated, elegant, and beautiful Audrey Hepburn is...but I really wonder how many have actually seen it! Definitely worth seeing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
Emily---May 15, 2009
This is just my favorite film. Audrey Hepburn is absolutely adorable! I recommend this book to everyone. its random yet classic feel with leave you melted!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
ERG1008Oct 26, 2010
Socialite meets writer who has moved into apartments, become friends, she wants a rich husband, both have secrets, he falls in love with her.
Iconic early sixties rom-com before the word was invented with Audrey Hepburn, George Peppard
Socialite meets writer who has moved into apartments, become friends, she wants a rich husband, both have secrets, he falls in love with her.
Iconic early sixties rom-com before the word was invented with Audrey Hepburn, George Peppard playing off each other with great chemistry and dialogue.
Despite the comedic face of the film, there is quite a dark under-current throughout which surprised me but wasn't keen on the awful stereotype played by Mickey Rooney. Lovely music also with "Moonriver" used in many different guises.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
lasttimeisawDec 3, 2012
For the sake of Audrey Hepburn, BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AlexLMay 2, 2019
Even though I had never seen Breakfast at Tiffany's, probably because it is so often referenced or talked about, I thought I had a really good grasp of what it was about. Now, I've watched it. Turns out, my assumptions were really not thatEven though I had never seen Breakfast at Tiffany's, probably because it is so often referenced or talked about, I thought I had a really good grasp of what it was about. Now, I've watched it. Turns out, my assumptions were really not that good and what I mean by that is that they were way off. I absolutely loved that movie. It aged beautifully, it feels timeless. The cinematography is superb and New York looks gorgeous in these exquisite tints and colors. Audrey Hepburn makes a very strong lead with this vibrant and captivating interpretation of Holly Golightly. She is so generous and invested in her part in a very excentric way giving her character such force. Her screen presence is magnetic, you just can't ignore her as though she had cast a spell on you. This very layered performance pulls you in and makes her enigmatic and somewhat improbable characters totally believable. I also appreciated very much the screenplay. It is resolutely modern for so many reasons. Thematically, it was clearly progressive for the time it was made and a lot of it still feels very fresh today and the expression of the gender roles and dynamics is certainly not traditional. When compared to most of today's rom-com, it feels even less stereotypical. The very enticing rhythm is also notable giving the whole movie this sense of urgency. The whole story, taking place in a more or less linear way, is told through subsequent fragments of life with often unpredictable jumps in time that lets you witness the evolution of the characters in a very dynamic way and it always keeps you very alert. Also, even though, it is most often talked about as a romance, personally, I'm not even sure that's how I would describe it. Honestly, during the entire movie, it's never clear what it is about. It embraces certainly much more than a banal love story and brings into light a wide-ranging list of topics. Also, as many have specified, Henry Mancini provides a very sweet soundtrack. Also, I found George Peppard's performance, even though his part is much more subdued than Hepburn's, absolutely delicious and dreamy. He's perfect for the role and shows tenderness and vulnerability rarely shown in male parts. Also, I have to admit his good looks totally swoon me every time he was on the screen. So gorgeous. Finally, I found the last part of the film very moving and it touched me dearly in a way I didn't expect at all. It really lingered with me and I was still moved and rethinking about it many days after viewing it. It really is a wonderful movie and with absolutely no questions it is a film you must see. Just watch it already if you haven't yet. I wish I hadn't waited so long before I did. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleMar 29, 2017
I confess that my recent viewing of William Wyler's heist comedy How to Steal a Million was the first time I had seen Audrey Hepburn in a starring role. Before that, just her bit cameo in Steven Spielberg's Always had crossed my path and thatI confess that my recent viewing of William Wyler's heist comedy How to Steal a Million was the first time I had seen Audrey Hepburn in a starring role. Before that, just her bit cameo in Steven Spielberg's Always had crossed my path and that came just mere weeks before the other occasion. In essence, I am just beginning in my understanding of Hepburn as an actress and perhaps no film captures everything she was in her roles than Breakfast at Tiffany's. Yet, before I get into reviewing it, I feel the need to share. Perhaps I am a bit grim in my own personal life. Death and its inevitability is, naturally, a mainstay in my mind. This has very little to do with Breakfast at Tiffany's on the surface, though I will later try to tie it back in out of my simple need to keep on task in these reviews. For me, death was always something to be feared, though it was focused inward. My own demise, as a young child, kept me up at nights. I can remember lying in bed, paralyzed by the thought that one day, I will die. This, as it often does, turned itself into two things. One, the burning desire to be remembered. When I was younger, the mark of being remembered is to somehow have a Wikipedia page. That way, in 100 years, some stupid kid can hit "random page" and my page will pop up and they will read about how banal my life actually turned out to be. While this may be a bit simplistic, it is the truth nonetheless. Second, fear of death of those I love. Whether it be my mother or my dog, the inevitability of their deaths and my resultant mourning often leaves me on the brink of tears. With my dog, now 15, having an infection under the skin around his salivary glands and being forced into a cone of shame as we wait for the swelling to go down, the light is most certainly appearing at the end of the tunnel. Perhaps not soon, as otherwise, he is incredibly healthy for a dog his age with little-to-no gray hair and enough energy to outpace many young pups. My mother, likewise, has been quite healthy aside from aches and pains. Both are a blessing and will be missed with all of my heart.

However, both have allowed me to realize something bigger. Just as Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain showed me that death is not to be feared, but to be embraced. The mortality of those that I love has shown me that my desire to be remembered does not need to wind up in something juvenile or asinine such as a Wikipedia. To be truly remembered is to remain in the hearts and minds of those that you love. Beyond those that you love, nobody else really matters and whether or not they are aware of your existence is simply not important. As for becoming remembered or finding those that you love, you can merely go about your day-to-day life and live it as you wish. Doing as you wish rather than what others think is right for you or expect you to do is the only way to secure happiness, which is always the key to unlocking the doors awaiting ahead.

Now, what does this have to do with Hepburn and Breakfast at Tiffany's? I am getting to that shortly. But, as many know, Hepburn died of cancer in 1993. In order for her to spend a final Christmas with family, Givenchy flew her out on a private plane - which was filled with flowers - to Switzerland. For some reason, this gesture - though I had read about it before - really struck a chord with me tonight. For Hepburn, she is clearly an idol. Women today still adore her and I have known female friends who have gone as her for Halloween with a black dress and gloves, akin to her famous outfit in this film. Yet, though an icon for women's fashion to this very day and a figure that will last on in Hollywood until the end of time, her final weeks and days were spent with those that she loved. Those that were dear to her gathered around and did anything they could to bring her a last little bit of joy as they spent time together to say goodbye. No matter how loved we are, at the end, only those we love really matter and should matter once we are gone. As long as we remain in their hearts and minds, it was a life worth living.

In her most famous role as Holly Golightly, Hepburn defines her persona as people will see her for as long as she is remembered. From her iconic dresses, cigarette holder, or hairstyle, every inch of her performance has been turned into a style or fashion icon. Bubbly and boisterous, Holly is like many girls I have known. Though they may appear dumb and shallow on the outside for their love of jewels, fancy dresses, or appearances, there is no doubt something on the inside. The rest is merely a facade to hide up something on the inside that hurts them or they do not like. Hepburn's Holly really captures this inner damage as she rejects men she cares for in order to go after rich men who she does not care about. To tie it in to the earlier discussion about death, she was afraid of losing people. To love is to let people in and to open yourself up to emotional turmoil when they leave.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Iky009Nov 28, 2016
Breakfast at Tiffany's is a surprisingly charming, sweet and funny movie. Audrey Hepburn did a wonderful performance. A magnificent classic .
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DamorgFeb 12, 2013
My opinion is that this film has not stood the test of time. Yes, the plot is logical, the characters are logical in what they do (even if what they do is illogical) and the acting is solid. The locations are fitting and all this creates aMy opinion is that this film has not stood the test of time. Yes, the plot is logical, the characters are logical in what they do (even if what they do is illogical) and the acting is solid. The locations are fitting and all this creates a very sweet and romantic movie. It's just that newer movies have copied or processed further the events of this one so many times that they are no longer unique. I gave the movie 7, If you like romantic drama with a bit of comedy you can easily give this movie a 9. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
funesFeb 18, 2013
[es] Aunque la película no es muy fiel al libro de Capote, es un magnífico complemento.
Creo que Blake Edwards hizo un magnífico trabajo, Audrey Hepburn dio vida a un personaje inolvidable que es suyo para siempre y la música deliciosa.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
sammieteeApr 13, 2013
I loved Breakfast at Tiffany's. Audrey Hepburn is amazing in everything she is in. This movie is a wonderful classic love story and you can't help but smile like an idiot at the end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
kyle20ellisApr 1, 2022
After seeing her in My Fair Lady, I wanted to see more of Audrey Hepburn's work, and Breakfast at Tiffany's was the film that almost everyone I spoke to about her recommended. After seeing it for myself, I found it delightful, it does haveAfter seeing her in My Fair Lady, I wanted to see more of Audrey Hepburn's work, and Breakfast at Tiffany's was the film that almost everyone I spoke to about her recommended. After seeing it for myself, I found it delightful, it does have its problems but a lot compensated. One is that it is really nice to look at. The cinematography and settings are really elegant, and Audrey's black dress makes her look amazing and svelte. Henry Mancini's score is also superb, full of sweet, poignant and jaunty melodies, and I have to say the song Moon River for its sublime melody and meaningful lyrics has to be one of my favourite songs of all time, it is so beautiful and romantic. In terms of performances, while George Peppard looks handsome and acts sweetly, it is Audrey's movie as she pretty much epitomises the film on her own. Her Holly Golightly, like Sigourney Weaver's Ellen Ripley, Vivien Leigh's Scarlet O'Hara, Bette Davis's Margo Channing and Ingrid Bergman's Ilsa, is very iconic as a character, like the film she is elegant, charming and enchanting even with her character flaws we still love her. In terms of comedy highlights, the early party scene really does stand out. However, despite all this, there are problems with the film, Mickey Rooney being at the top of the list. I have nothing against Rooney, but his Japanese landlord felt stereotyped and unnecessary despite one or two mildly amusing moments, and I felt Rooney overacted. While the dialogue is witty in spots, it is also very fluffy and sugary, while the story is uneven in places, and meanders as well. Lastly, the ending felt somewhat tacked on, sweet yes but you couldn't help thinking "I want more" and it could've done with being less unambiguous. Overall, despite the flaws, it is engaging and delightful. 7.5/10 Bethany Cox Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
RoachReviews303Oct 22, 2016
The book itself is phenomenal but the movie is really something else. Shoutout to Henry Mancini for the lovely sounds and Hepburn for the even more lovelier looks.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
amheretojudgeAug 19, 2018
too caloric for it to be to nutritious..

Breakfast At Tiffany's 3 Out Of 5 Breakfast At Tiffany's is a character driven romantic drama about a complex girl that weaves nothing but trouble to herself and others. As much as mysterious the
too caloric for it to be to nutritious..

Breakfast At Tiffany's

3 Out Of 5

Breakfast At Tiffany's is a character driven romantic drama about a complex girl that weaves nothing but trouble to herself and others. As much as mysterious the character is kept, the characteristics and the properties explained or not explained is worth the whole build up of it. But this is where the feature gets stuck, not only is it confused to its core in order to the theme or the tone of the feature it is utterly imbalanced and unstable throughout the course of it. Few goofy and flawed sequences especially in its initial stages throws off the audience with a knack for imputing humor forcibly is something that grows annoying as it ages on screen. It is undeniably chalky around the edges but its heart is somehow in the right place that keeps the audience rooting for the characters. The writing is strong on keeping the characters intriguing and pacing up the script but falls flatly on shifting from one to another; requires better polishing. Repetitive props, familiar characters and the awareness of the surrounding and the way it uses them wisely is soothing to eyes. It is rich on technical aspects like background score, editing and costume design but is short on cinematography and camera work which could have easily been a lot better. Edwards; the director, still needs a bit of work on his executing skills but his self-created world is something that is eye-popping. Hepburn is on her A game where she has the range and rights to carry it off all in her shoulder with Peppard supporting him decently. Pragmatic conversations, character's eerie perspective and stunning colourful visuals and costume designing are the high points of the feature. Breakfast At Tiffany's is actually too caloric for it to be nutritious and the primary reason is its ability to draw out the attention from the safer textbook equation.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
sarahseans12Feb 4, 2018
This movie is definitely a classic for all those who love the Golden Age of Hollywood. It is a cute movie. Audrey Hepburn makes the movie with her beauty and elegance. It is a nice movie. Not my favorite Audrey Hepburn movie, but it isThis movie is definitely a classic for all those who love the Golden Age of Hollywood. It is a cute movie. Audrey Hepburn makes the movie with her beauty and elegance. It is a nice movie. Not my favorite Audrey Hepburn movie, but it is definitely a cute one. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
FilipeNetoMar 15, 2020
Despite fame and a great Audrey Hepburn, it is not as good as I thought.

I confess that I expected something more from this film. It's good, but it's not as good as I thought it would be. Basically, it tells the story of a gold digger, a
Despite fame and a great Audrey Hepburn, it is not as good as I thought.

I confess that I expected something more from this film. It's good, but it's not as good as I thought it would be. Basically, it tells the story of a gold digger, a luxury prostitute who wants to marry a rich man and get on with life in the simplest way ... but who ends up falling in love with a man who is everything she was not looking for .

Well, this is one of those films that is based on the performance of an actor, in this case Audrey Hepburn. She is beautiful and is at her best in this film. The film has an impact and strength because of her and her extraordinary performance. Even so, I agree with many critics who say that this film is not even the best she has ever made, although this discussion is subjective. It is however the most famous. George Peppard is also good, but he never gets to meet her. On the negative side, I hated to see Mickey Rooney bring a Japanese to life according to the most deeply prejudiced and insulting stereotype. I already talked a little about the script, but honestly I thought that the story told tells me very little and that the main character is deeply unpleasant due to its materialism and futility. Another actress in that role and the film would probably be forgotten in the present, as many have been.

Finally, a word to the soundtrack, which is the best and most interesting technical detail of the film. Composed by Henry Mancini, it features the famous and touching song "Moon River".
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DawdlingPoetNov 27, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a somewhat slow moving, dull film. I don't suppose im the main intended audience for it but it really didn't appeal to me much. The characters didn't seem interesting, although I liked some of the settings/surroundings and the music used was quite good. I know its a classic film for many and I guess I can understand why, if you like the whole mystery behind the main character, Holly Golightly and enjoy finding what happens to her, romantically etc. Audrey Hepburn gives a decent performance as said character. There are some instances of nice dialogue but not a whole lot else really that greatly appealed to me. Its obviously fairly sentimental, which may or may not appeal to you, depending on your taste in films and the like. Also I can't not mention the clearly (in this modern day) racist depiction of an asian man by Mickey Rooney, that made me cringe.

For fans of Hepburn etc., I'd recommend this film but if your mainly keen on thought provoking or gritty/dark drama fans, then I wouldn't recommend it as such, no.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RobwinzDec 11, 2020
Every female boomers profile picture on social media lmaooooooooooooooooooo
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
iCampoRamilOct 11, 2022
Si os digo la verdad, no sé como llegué a la decisión de ver esta película, de hecho, no sabía que esperarme ni prácticamente conocía la cinta más allá de un ligero "me suena el nombre", pero decidí adentrarme en esas casi 2 horas de películaSi os digo la verdad, no sé como llegué a la decisión de ver esta película, de hecho, no sabía que esperarme ni prácticamente conocía la cinta más allá de un ligero "me suena el nombre", pero decidí adentrarme en esas casi 2 horas de película que, pese a que me costó engancharme, ahora recuerdo con cierta ternura, aunque tampoco sé decir el porqué.
Tiene una construcción bastante rara, quizás era habitual en la época, no estoy muy familiarizado, pero como dije, no me acababa de enganchar, no sabía muy bien por dónde iban los tiros más allá de ver si los protagonistas se enamoraban o no, y a pesar de ello, me parece una construcción inteligente, una buena presentación de los personajes que continúa con un gran desarrollo, a pesar de que si no llega a ser por Holly y la actuación de Audrey Hepburn, no me habría enganchado lo más mínimo.

· Cosas buenas: tanto el reparto como las actuaciones me parecen sublimes. El aura que desprende New York, la construcción, rara pero inteligente.
· Cosas malas: queramos o no, sus bromas están desfasadas en la actualidad, hay contextos o significaciones que no acabo de pillar.
· Conclusión: es de esas películas que recordarás con cariño, sobre todo por "Gato" y por Holly, está más que bien para pasar el rato, aún así, tienes que saber lo que vas a ver.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
dario12Sep 12, 2021
Breakfast at Tiffanys is one very good film that showcases New York in very realistic way even though Im not from there but still I understand how it was living there at least in that times.
Also Audrey is one of most beautiful womans that
Breakfast at Tiffanys is one very good film that showcases New York in very realistic way even though Im not from there but still I understand how it was living there at least in that times.
Also Audrey is one of most beautiful womans that ever lived.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
royalguy07Feb 9, 2023
I definitely get the whole Audrey Hepburn thing, she gives a great performance here. The racist caricature stuff is deservedly shamed, thankfully its not really that big of a part of the story. The rest of the movie is not that great though,I definitely get the whole Audrey Hepburn thing, she gives a great performance here. The racist caricature stuff is deservedly shamed, thankfully its not really that big of a part of the story. The rest of the movie is not that great though, unfortunately. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews