Bram Stoker's Dracula

Columbia Pictures | Release Date: November 13, 1992

8.3	USER SCORE Universal acclaim based on 380 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

AtticusDApr 10, 2009

Easily on of the worst movies I have ever seen. Keanu Reeves seriously needs to learn how to act.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

DavidMOct 4, 2009

The worst film I've seen, read the book, it's much better.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

imthenoobNov 12, 2018

It's a visually stunning movie and still lives up in comparison to films nowadays but my lord, This has to be one of the worst acted movies I've ever seen. If it's not over-acting by the lead talent, It's the junk performance by Reeves thatIt's a visually stunning movie and still lives up in comparison to films nowadays but my lord, This has to be one of the worst acted movies I've ever seen. If it's not over-acting by the lead talent, It's the junk performance by Reeves that really drives it home. It's a hard film to finish because it's so laughably bad at times.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

TeiturDec 16, 2017

The heavy reliance on monologing ruined a lot of the movie for me. i am aware that this can be tricky to work yourself out off in a book adaptation, but it seemed absolutely lazy. All of the elements in the movie that should scare me in anyThe heavy reliance on monologing ruined a lot of the movie for me. i am aware that this can be tricky to work yourself out off in a book adaptation, but it seemed absolutely lazy. All of the elements in the movie that should scare me in any way fall flat, which is a huge problem for a "horror" movie. The only redeeming parts of the movie are the faithful adaptation of the book and the visuals that surely were ahead of their time. All in all i did not enjoy it and would not recomend it to anyone.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

B-BogJan 11, 2019

One of the worst movies I've ever seen, by far. Way too long, very boring, Winona Ryder can't act to save her life and the set pieces look like they were built ouf of papier-mâché. I'll give it one point for having Tom Waits in it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

MonsoonrainNov 26, 2021

Very disappointing movie for me after having listened to the audiobook. The original novel was very feminist, and this movie totally destroys the two female characters. They basically go the rest of the movie with no agency of their own andVery disappointing movie for me after having listened to the audiobook. The original novel was very feminist, and this movie totally destroys the two female characters. They basically go the rest of the movie with no agency of their own and with nothing more on their minds but sex. I couldn't understand what Gary Oldman was saying most of the time due to his strange accent. Keanu Reaves turns Jonathan Harker's character into the most boring piece of white bread, so I guess it's not surprising that Mina starts falling for Dracula instead.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews