Blade Runner 2049

9

chunjurrinchhenOct 11, 2017

This movie has been not doing well in cinemas and this is the reason we get Movies like Transformers more often than these kinds of masterpiece. I loved everything about this movie. The music was awesome,visuals are just so delicious andThis movie has been not doing well in cinemas and this is the reason we get Movies like Transformers more often than these kinds of masterpiece. I loved everything about this movie. The music was awesome,visuals are just so delicious and looked so real, the story was open ended for the viewers to theorize, it was so intelligently made and made people wonder how things came to be and i love the fact that the movie didnt give us all the answers at the end. Great performace from Gosling, he kind of carried the movie all the way through. Jared Leto was just weird, dont know if its a praise or criticism lol. MUST WATCH and save CINEMA… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

9

P_AndyLewisOct 12, 2017

Visually stunning, fantastic progressive storytelling with satisfying and emotionally charged reveals.
The length of this film was a little overwhelming but that is just a minor issue amongst such a fantastic experience.

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

9

ishaan023Oct 12, 2017

Enthralling,mesmerizing,visually stunning,masterpiece and a future classic are the words that suitably describe Blade Runner 2049

Blade runner 2049 is an exquisitely crafted sequel which stands shoulder to shoulder with its predecessor,BladeEnthralling,mesmerizing,visually stunning,masterpiece and a future classic are the words that suitably describe Blade Runner 2049

Blade runner 2049 is an exquisitely crafted sequel which stands shoulder to shoulder with its predecessor,Blade runner,one of the greatest movies ever made.

The neo-noir setting with an unwavering sense of impending doom amplifies the eeriness and adds dimensions to the film.The plot is solid , rich with characters and minor details all building up to an intense climax.Ryan Gosling , Harrison Ford, Ana De Armas, Jared Leto, Sylvia Hoeks act masterfully in their respective roles .Ryan Gosling plays the role of the lead perfectly .The characters are well built and rounded .Much is left to be desired out of Jared Leto’s character who feels kind of left out in the movie plot but is sure to play a major role in future sequels ,if any are made.The direction and cinematography is where the movie hits a homerun.Denis Villeneuve has created a mindblowing, sci-fi masterpiece no doubt.He is hands-down one of the best directors in the industry at the moment.Villeneuve has done a great job by skillfully integrating suspense and tension with the core of the movie plot.Roger Deakins does an amazing job as the cinematographer .The cinematography is one of the best I have ever seen in a movie.Every shot tells a story ,represents a theme chaos,beauty,love,fear,tension,insecurity etc.The production design and quality is top notch.The cinemascore and sound effects are amazing.
The plot pacing is where the movie dips and could be turn off for some moviegoers.The movie is long,plain long(163 minutes) and the pace is slow.Not all moments are part of the main movie plot ,but introduced for possible movie sequels

Final Verdict:Blade runner 2049 is a plot driven,intense,lengthy and a mindblowing sci-fi movie not less than a piece of art.If you love this kind of cinema this movie is for you.If your movie preference is the cars blowing,fights-breaking,explosion occurring every 15-min Michael Bay movie then this is not for you as you would lose all patience by the time movie reaches its climax.

Score: 9/10: Translates to “Must Watch”… Expand

8 of 10 users found this helpful82

All this user's reviews

9

igor_radchenkoOct 13, 2017

Denis Villeneuve unmistakably captures the tone and aesthetic of the Blade Runner universe, while bringing an original story that further explores the predecessor's themes. Combining that with state of the art visual effects and compellingDenis Villeneuve unmistakably captures the tone and aesthetic of the Blade Runner universe, while bringing an original story that further explores the predecessor's themes. Combining that with state of the art visual effects and compelling new characters, Blade Runner 2049 is exactly how a modern sequel to a classic cinematic experience should be tackled.… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

9

CrazyGandalfOct 15, 2017

the CGI in the movie is perfect, the vilain is terrible because he nearly doesnt appear, the story is really well build and makes you intrested the whole movie. rian gosling is great as K in the movie, but the movie is a little too long,the CGI in the movie is perfect, the vilain is terrible because he nearly doesnt appear, the story is really well build and makes you intrested the whole movie. rian gosling is great as K in the movie, but the movie is a little too long, sometimes the director Denis Villenuve take a long time to make something quick, but the movie is great… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

9

mhouston52Oct 17, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful movie with some of the best cinematography I have ever seen. Although it did not attract many fans other than the typical Sci-Fi dystopian fan, it is one of the best movies I have ever seen. I give it a 9/10

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

9

Will-BOct 19, 2017

It's visually stunning with a semi-easy plot to follow with some of the best performances you'll see from Gosling and Ford. This will go down as not only one of the best movies of 2017, but also one of the best sequels of all time.

9 of 10 users found this helpful91

All this user's reviews

9

dapennOct 25, 2017

First off, this movie is quite amazing. From its cinematography, to its acting, to its overall plot it is a phenomenal movie from start to finish. But this is not a movie to go see with your friends. The one thing you need to know is that youFirst off, this movie is quite amazing. From its cinematography, to its acting, to its overall plot it is a phenomenal movie from start to finish. But this is not a movie to go see with your friends. The one thing you need to know is that you really need to pay attention to what happening. You should not look at your phone when watching this movie. This movie is almost 3 hours long and you really need to pay attention in order to get whats going on in this film. The pacing of the movie is slow and it takes its time explaining what is happening on screen, but paying attention is a definite. But if you have the time, this movie is surely worth the money!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

KerokiOct 29, 2017

Película visualmente muy bella, con buena fotografía y efectos. tal vez uno de los fallos es demorar algunas escenas mas de lo necesario ademas de ser lenta, esto puede llegar a ser aburrido o tedioso para algunos espectadores, aunque a mi enPelícula visualmente muy bella, con buena fotografía y efectos. tal vez uno de los fallos es demorar algunas escenas mas de lo necesario ademas de ser lenta, esto puede llegar a ser aburrido o tedioso para algunos espectadores, aunque a mi en lo personal me gusto. En cuanto a la trama me parece muy buena, es cierto que tiene algunos fallos de guion muy pequeños, pero en general muy buena pelicula.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

9

MallRat15Nov 15, 2017

One of my favourites of the year. An absolutely visually stunning movie deserves the Special Effects Oscar this year for sure. The sound is also amazing the soundtrack and sound effects really immerse you into the film. All of theOne of my favourites of the year. An absolutely visually stunning movie deserves the Special Effects Oscar this year for sure. The sound is also amazing the soundtrack and sound effects really immerse you into the film. All of the performances lead by Ford and Gosling were very good. The movie is a little long a few boring scenes, if it was cut down by 15 minutes or so it would be an almost perfect movie. A must see this year.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

9

Mihael_Prislin0Dec 1, 2017

Yet the best movie of 2017! It is also one of the best sequels of any franchize! Spectacular visual efects, amazing soundtrack, beautiful performances, a perfect movie to watch in theatres! You need to be a fan of the original to understandYet the best movie of 2017! It is also one of the best sequels of any franchize! Spectacular visual efects, amazing soundtrack, beautiful performances, a perfect movie to watch in theatres! You need to be a fan of the original to understand the point of the movie! If you didn't have a chance of watching the original, than you shouldn't be watching this one! Dennis Villenauve never dissapoints you!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

PietriejJul 19, 2023

A near-perfect movie, with an amazing atmosphere and fantastic storytelling.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

loumexJun 1, 2023

I am returning to leave a review, 6 years after watching the movie when it got released on cinemas. But things have changed. Surely, the comparison made with the original was not just, but you know what, I take that back. Having watched theI am returning to leave a review, 6 years after watching the movie when it got released on cinemas. But things have changed. Surely, the comparison made with the original was not just, but you know what, I take that back. Having watched the Final Cut exactly before rewatching this, I have to say it is one heck of a sequel: and a REAL sequel. A story which continues and even ends up transcending the original. It leaves the same questions open to interpetation. But that is part of the charm. Also, Vangelis will always be a legend, but they did a pretty good job in making a sequel to the OST as well. Seriously, I was against this sequel and perhaps even was too harsh about reviewing it. I take it all back. This is the real deal. This is one AMAZING movie and a textbook sequel well worth your time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

HyapeDec 21, 2017

It's an amazing picrure. A near perfect, with deep deep atmospere. A masterpiece.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

nightmovesJan 29, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is a great movie that keeps you guessing until the very end. The movie has a great cast and plot. Also, the tech that was created for this movie seems so real and fits so well into their crafted world. The only negative forBlade Runner 2049 is a great movie that keeps you guessing until the very end. The movie has a great cast and plot. Also, the tech that was created for this movie seems so real and fits so well into their crafted world. The only negative for me would be the "soundtrack". Villeneuve opted to copy the booms and bass drops from his other movie the Arrival and I feel that it distracts from the movie in places.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Rhaegar1980Jan 1, 2018

A great sequel, with just one problem: 10-15 minutes too long.
Beside that: awesome atmosphere, visuals, audio and storytelling.
A simple story for complex characters.
New classic together with the immortal first chapter.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

9

WalterKovacsDec 26, 2017

True homage to the original. A great sequel. Truly refreshing. The ending tapered off and some characters should have been better developed for a trade of some of the other scenes. A must see, especially in 3-D.

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

9

ZaarekDec 27, 2017

I loved everything about this movie. This is the kind of movie that makes you travel to another world but at the same time treats of very concrete human topics. It is so rich, it's full of information and questions at the same time. It makesI loved everything about this movie. This is the kind of movie that makes you travel to another world but at the same time treats of very concrete human topics. It is so rich, it's full of information and questions at the same time. It makes you travel both visually and mentally at the same time. During the whole movie you'll be wondering if it is science-fiction or anticipation? Some philosophical topics are treated without getting boring. What's the meaning of destiny or sense of purpose? What's the difference between man and machine if both are capable of having feelings and emotions? Denis Villeneuve, his crew and the cast just set new standards to what a masterpiece can be. Well done guys.… Expand

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

9

RonQuixote_Jan 8, 2018

A story that didn't need to be told ended up being the story I didn't know I needed. 2049 expands on the world created by its predecessor and still manages to be as daring and beautiful. The 2 hour and 45-minute run-time somehow seem shorterA story that didn't need to be told ended up being the story I didn't know I needed. 2049 expands on the world created by its predecessor and still manages to be as daring and beautiful. The 2 hour and 45-minute run-time somehow seem shorter than the 2 hours of the original (depending on what version you watch, duh). This movie is masterclass from Denis Villeneuve because every single decision made in this movie was the best one possible.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

FranbarrmanFeb 26, 2018

I dont know wich film i love more if this one or the original, so this movie is almoast perfect i cant see anything wrong in it or something that ill change but still i wouldnt recomended it because is too slow and its not for everybody.I dont know wich film i love more if this one or the original, so this movie is almoast perfect i cant see anything wrong in it or something that ill change but still i wouldnt recomended it because is too slow and its not for everybody. Loved Ryan as "K", Dennis getting better film after film and Deakins is god in it.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

9

mcindoe-jordanFeb 26, 2018

I was not the biggest fan of the first but this one is fantastic and my new favorite Denis Villeneuve film. **** perfect

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

LegitSaltMay 5, 2020

Blade Runner 2049 successfully does what many sequels fail to do in taking the original film, Blade Runner, and building it up. Blade Runner 2049 takes the same world, themes, and characters and makes them more fleshed out. Blade Runner 2049Blade Runner 2049 successfully does what many sequels fail to do in taking the original film, Blade Runner, and building it up. Blade Runner 2049 takes the same world, themes, and characters and makes them more fleshed out. Blade Runner 2049 is especially remarkable because it manages to capture the spirit of the original while coming out over three decades later. Blade Runner 2049 is still a thrilling and invigorating experience for those unfamiliar with the Blade Runner universe. Villeneuve’s style is especially apparent with this entry. The shot composition and especially the cinematography allow for grandiose worldbuilding. Gosling and Ford both portray similar characters, Deckard and ‘K’ respectively, but represent the duality of their world. Where ‘K’ falls short, Deckard’s legacy picks up the ball. Bladerunner 2049 has so many intricacies and subtleties to it that it remains present in the viewer’s mind long after its initial watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

HopDoubleScotchApr 6, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I've always thought Blade Runner was a bit overrated, granted you can't take a single cinema class without talking about Shape, Line, form and movement, but at the same time it presents us with some of the deepest and conflicting arguments and topics of conversation I personally have ever come across. 2049 is no different. I watched Blade Runner 2049 in the hopes of seeing something new brought to the world of "Group 'X' has no rights and needs to be eliminated." And the change brought here is so much more than "Cloned humans are not human," But instead "Cloned Humans can be MORE human than humans." The concept behind the films biggest plot device; the Replicant from the first film "Rachael" giving birth to a human child, serves as a shock to the viewer that there very well may come a time where we need to look inside ourselves and see what we'd be willing to do to hide such a secret. Or even more than that, whether or not we could even consider that child to be human. In a world where the hot topic is political Refugees or Immigration, surely there will come a time in the near future where this franchise is used as a tool to argue that perhaps we're not as evolved as we like to consider.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

GrantD243Apr 25, 2018

I have to admit, I am not a huge fan of the original Blade Runner. It was an alright movie, but I found it to be a relatively simple sci-fi movie. So when Blade Runner 2049 was announced, I knew I'd go see it but I wasn't extremely excited orI have to admit, I am not a huge fan of the original Blade Runner. It was an alright movie, but I found it to be a relatively simple sci-fi movie. So when Blade Runner 2049 was announced, I knew I'd go see it but I wasn't extremely excited or anything. But when I walked out of the theater after seeing it, I was raving about it for a few weeks.

I just love everything about this movie. The incredible visuals, the complex story, the minimal but effective dialogue...everything. The only thing that I guess I don't like is the length. You can definitely feel that this is a two-hour and forty-four minute movie, but it's so good that I can dismiss that as a very small gripe. Dennis Villeneuve directed a sci-fi movie that I actually like more than most of the Star Wars movies, which is something I never thought I'd say. Unfortunately, we'll probably never see another Blade Runner movie since this one underperformed big time at the box office, but at least we got this one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

mr-NachoMenMay 13, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is a near perfect but beautiful film with an intriguing storyline that never felt rushed nor boring, even for it's almost 3hrs run time. Honesty, i never though that Blade Runner will ever had a sequel, but it has it, andBlade Runner 2049 is a near perfect but beautiful film with an intriguing storyline that never felt rushed nor boring, even for it's almost 3hrs run time. Honesty, i never though that Blade Runner will ever had a sequel, but it has it, and it's a great sequel after all with incredible visuals and great soundtrack , the performance were great as well and none of the character were plain tedious to really think "i hate you"
The photography and the use of colors in the lighting were good at some parts and make the scenarios felt almost too real.
Overall... it's a "almost" perfect movie, with beautiful visuals and soundtrack that were the important factors for this movie to be what it is "stunning".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

natedeugJul 25, 2018

A sequel/soft-reboot that proves better than the original? Yes. Believe the hype, this sci-fi noir holds your attention with a real mystery, while dazzling with its cinematography.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

EgeBerkJan 31, 2019

Perfect universe I didn't remember much recently, did I have such a good guess about how the world will be in the future.
I think the film tells us the best of the future, maybe there are a few movies I did not watch but I think the bladePerfect universe I didn't remember much recently, did I have such a good guess about how the world will be in the future.
I think the film tells us the best of the future, maybe there are a few movies I did not watch but I think the blade runner is the best
I also remembered that there were altered carbon array of the netflix construction I liked it.once filmed old film is not forgotten,I thought it would be a very different topic, but it was much more relevant to the old film,
it was very touching to me.
of course I would love to see in Rachel but this could not be the subject,If you watch this movie without watching the first movie, I think you can not understand.
I'm fond of this style as it is not very fluent in the slow music selections of the old blade runner-style transitions,but people who didn't know the blade runner could find it a bit boring.
images gorgeous effects wonderful already won the best visual effect in the academy,
he was nominated for oscar best sound mixed but he could not compete with dunkirk.
I like the film in general, if you look at the audience and the ratings,also received 81 points from the criticism, this is very good only at the box office did not catch the expected success more than I would expect

I would recommend to anyone recently watched the best movie but first watch the Blade Runner (1982).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DBM2018Oct 26, 2018

Fantastic movie. Great audio and better visuals. Good performances. A worthy successor to the original. One of the better big budget movies to be released in recent years.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MurphyBrandonSep 15, 2019

This is a worthy successor to the original Blade Runner film. It was clever, exciting, and gorgeous.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

alvindinoMar 11, 2019

This is the kind of spectacle that is so amazing, its luxurious visuals are constantly feeding the eyes, so it can inspire many people. Even though it tells about artificial creatures, nothing feels like a replica. Emotions are genuine. TheThis is the kind of spectacle that is so amazing, its luxurious visuals are constantly feeding the eyes, so it can inspire many people. Even though it tells about artificial creatures, nothing feels like a replica. Emotions are genuine. The feelings conveyed by the characters are so human. Through strong plot, reasonable world development, and a series of philosophical questions that flow smoothly as story dimensions, this successful film success becomes not only one of the best sequels - it can stand alone, not depend on other films - but also the best films ever existed.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

DennydendenJun 15, 2019

While some of the scenes in this movie are a little too brooding and long it provides a great and creative CG not seen in other movies. The casting and acting is superb. Would have liked to see of Leto's character, Wallice developed moreWhile some of the scenes in this movie are a little too brooding and long it provides a great and creative CG not seen in other movies. The casting and acting is superb. Would have liked to see of Leto's character, Wallice developed more instead of the overly long 'Elvis' scene in Vegas and others. Leto was great at portraying what little of this character we see. As it is his character is too disjointed and sketchy to make much sense. There is a depth there that just wasn't developed.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

CassieReaburbAug 7, 2019

A masterpiece and I already knew it before they shot the first frame. This is a Denis Villeneuve film, and anybody versed with the man's filmography will realize that this is an artist of the highest order. Had Blade Runner been given toA masterpiece and I already knew it before they shot the first frame. This is a Denis Villeneuve film, and anybody versed with the man's filmography will realize that this is an artist of the highest order. Had Blade Runner been given to anybody- even Ridley, I can guarantee you the final result wouldn’t be half as good as what we see here. Ryan Gosling takes over the role played by Harrison Ford in the 1982 original and he essays an effortlessly cool protagonist living in the future of decay and destitute. Harrison Ford is also back in a glorified cameo but its glad to see the old man back in this Universe. The special effects are amazing with a careful mixture of carefully rendered CGI and practical effects. The film looks fantastic, but it is the plot that is the heart and soul of this great film. You should go and watch Blade Runner before seeing 2049 and then come and marvel at this masterpiece. One of the best recent science fiction films.(Denis Villeneuve has created a masterpiece).… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

glommanJun 14, 2022

It's honestly a bloody shame that this movie performed so poorly in cinemas, it's one of the best Sci-Fi movies I've seen in recent years - in some aspects even better than its predecessor. The world, the characters, the aesthetic in general,It's honestly a bloody shame that this movie performed so poorly in cinemas, it's one of the best Sci-Fi movies I've seen in recent years - in some aspects even better than its predecessor. The world, the characters, the aesthetic in general, everything feels alive yet strictly synthetic, but in a good way. The mere scale by which corporations have penetrated the lives of the characters is often closer to real life than one might think - albeit a bit more fancy in the Blade Runner Universe. Still, even as a sequel it does a brilliant job, it spins the questions of the first movie further, tells a new story from a new - but still oddly same - perspective and manages to neither throne upon or succumb to its predecessor's established story and world, it manages to find its own way. I love almost everything about this movie, it's a bit too long and a bit too short here and there, but it's still a movie I definitely recommend to watch, if you love sci-fi or even a melancholic and somewhat action-heavy drama.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BradMorganApr 28, 2020

This film is a work of art. Stunning images, fantastic sound design and beautiful colors. The story was mysterious and the time was taken to tell it at a good pace.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

AWESOM-0Jan 29, 2020

This is a beautiful movie and it captures the essence of what the first movie was about. It does so in a different way, and does so with heart.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

TudorPopescuDec 31, 2021

I have not seen the first movie, but I enjoyed Blade Runner 2049. Most notably the visuals, the atmosphere and the overall feel of it. It is a fairly long film, but it didn't feel long. And I just loved the relationship and chemistry betweenI have not seen the first movie, but I enjoyed Blade Runner 2049. Most notably the visuals, the atmosphere and the overall feel of it. It is a fairly long film, but it didn't feel long. And I just loved the relationship and chemistry between K and Joi.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

geewahJan 9, 2021

Never imagined there being a sequel to Blade Runner, but this effort is exceptionally good.
While not as moody or atmospheric as the original it is still a fantastic movie in it's own right.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

9

ANTNSHNDec 15, 2020

Stunningly beautiful shots, the atmosphere of noir and cyberpunk is transmitted luxuriously, looks in one breath. the actors play at the highest level, the film keeps in suspense until the very end.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

Reviewer102Jul 2, 2021

Blade Runner 2049 is beautifully crafted .

What makes Blade Runner 2049 special is how it blends everything well together . This isn't simply a 'movie,' it is art . This is a love letter to the movie franchise . This is a film that wasBlade Runner 2049 is beautifully crafted .

What makes Blade Runner 2049 special is how it blends everything well together .

This isn't simply a 'movie,' it is art .

This is a love letter to the movie franchise .

This is a film that was overlooked by many but those who have enjoyed watching it will know
how underappreciated this film is .

A timeless film no doubt .… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

Embalmer98Jun 8, 2021

□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□■□
+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

UltimobeakerJul 4, 2021

In an era where 35-year sequels and remakes are merely vehicles for a quick cash grab, Blade Runner 2049 is perhaps the only example that lives up to the original. I'd dare to say that this even surpasses the original Blade Runner in manyIn an era where 35-year sequels and remakes are merely vehicles for a quick cash grab, Blade Runner 2049 is perhaps the only example that lives up to the original. I'd dare to say that this even surpasses the original Blade Runner in many ways, particularly in the plot, score, and moral implications. It also defines its own aesthetic, which while not as groundbreaking, is equally meticulous. What it doesn't do as well as the original is in the overacted, unmotivated villains and a bit of the deus ex machina ending... but we're just nitpicking here. Denis Villeneuve has proven that he can just about handle any subject matter with the attention to detail and care that the fans deserve. Its a tragedy that BR2049 did not get the financial success needed for Hollywood to explore this world further. Perhaps in another 35 years.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

Mankind_dividedOct 24, 2021

A sequel that actually lives up to the original. Breath taking visuals and cinematography with an interesting story.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

mikasa_Aug 3, 2022

Пожалуй, лучший фильм Дэнни Вильнева на данный момент. Визуальная красота картины остаётся на уровне оригинала, но вот сюжет лучше раскрывает основную проблему романа — может ли машина быть человечнее человека?Пожалуй, лучший фильм Дэнни Вильнева на данный момент. Визуальная красота картины остаётся на уровне оригинала, но вот сюжет лучше раскрывает основную проблему романа — может ли машина быть человечнее человека?

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

bruhgmger2Aug 24, 2022

This was an absolute treat. It's interesting how this film is very much Blade Runner while still being very much it's own thing. It uses a similar starting point to launch onto quite different paths. For that reason, I find comparing theseThis was an absolute treat. It's interesting how this film is very much Blade Runner while still being very much it's own thing. It uses a similar starting point to launch onto quite different paths. For that reason, I find comparing these two films to be at once difficult and also rewarding. I would say that what I liked about the original I liked more, but there was also more that I disliked in the original than here. You could say the original was a "peaks and valleys" film and this one is more consistent throughout.

As for the film in its own right, I would say there's basically nothing I disliked. As you'd expect, the visuals are gorgeous and the soundtrack is great (although not quite as good as in the original IMO). The mystery at he heart of the plot is engaging and really leans into the noir inspirations of the franchise, which I was always a big fan of. The villain is genuinely menacing and you always get the impression he's got more going for him than he lets on. The world is explored more here and I liked basically everything I got, especially the dancing Soviet Ballerina. The emotions this film packs is impressive; you really start to empathize with these characters after a while, and as someone who really dislikes bringing back long gone characters in sequels I really liked how they integrated old characters back into this one. The ending was great too. Overall, a great film and one I'd highly recommend.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Richard552Aug 15, 2022

I was nervous about what Villeneuve would come up with as I was not a fan of Arrival which I thought was far too ponderous.$1 to buy a Netflix account, Google search: vtvshare

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DawidJohnsonFeb 6, 2023

If I see one more edit of a white,lonely loser dickriding Ryan Gosling, I will cut my ears off and jump off my roof.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Potet69Aug 20, 2023

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

LamontRaymondOct 6, 2017

It's crazy just how much I felt like I was back in the 80s. The tone and feel of the movie so mirrored the original. But the grandeur and sound (I think this film did some serious damage to speakers in my AMC) are off-the-charts. I love howIt's crazy just how much I felt like I was back in the 80s. The tone and feel of the movie so mirrored the original. But the grandeur and sound (I think this film did some serious damage to speakers in my AMC) are off-the-charts. I love how it rolls out thematically, and it scratches that nostalgic itch with several call-backs. Yes, it's a little long and certain scenes get stretch out, but wow, were the women roles in this film incredible. I'll have to see it again.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

8

TheQuietGamerMar 23, 2018

Denis Villeneuve's immaculate visuals and the score from Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch lend themselves well to the Blade Runner experience, expertly recreating the tone and look of the original. This worthy follow up takes every elementDenis Villeneuve's immaculate visuals and the score from Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch lend themselves well to the Blade Runner experience, expertly recreating the tone and look of the original. This worthy follow up takes every element of it's predecessor and builds upon them. Even the idiosyncrasies of Ridley Scott's groundbreaking sci-fi film like the weird moments and awkward humor are used to much greater effect here. The latter feeling actually intentional this time around (because it is). Something that enables the laughs to feel natural and fluid, as opposed to at the movie's expense. The plot is an absolute rollercoaster ride of emotion, suspense, and surprise depth. The nods to the first Blade Runner are more than just fan service. They cement 2049 as not just a follow up, but an actual continuation of the previous movie's story. Even right down to the themes and concepts. There are moments here so strange, imaginative, and crazy that they could only come from the science-fiction genre and be taken seriously. There are so many fascinating aspects built into the world itself that make it feel real and worth exploring deeper. It's these futuristic anomalies and the visual splendor that kept me engaged whenever the story started to dawdle.

While it is never outright boring like the first often was during it's middle act, there's little denying that some scenes simply exist for no reason other than to show off how pretty things are. 2049 does a much better job at keeping viewers interested, but still wasn't quite able to avoid the original's pacing issues. This really didn't need to be almost three hours long. There are things that could have met the chopping block or have been edited down without sacrificing the material's potency. I had to give myself an extended intermission about half way through the film because of how dang long it is. I was never not enjoying the movie, but a break felt very necessary nonetheless. Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful, grand, and even an exhausting experience that is backed by incredible performances (Jared Leto redeems himself after Suicide Squad) and continues the Blade Runner story in ways both spectacular and moving. While it's stands very well on it's own I do recommend watching a version of the 1982 film first just to get the whole picture of why this movie is so great. Not only is it a welcome return to a world you may or may not have come into contact with 35 years ago, but it's one that manages to be even better than the first outing. Denis Villeneuve blew me away once again and I hope to see more from the Blade Runner universe in the future.

8.9/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

kamgeforceDec 27, 2019

Will this be a cult movie along the lines of its predecessor? No. The plot simply isnt interesting or original enough for that. However it is an audiovisual treat with good performances from all actors, competent cinematography and decentWill this be a cult movie along the lines of its predecessor? No. The plot simply isnt interesting or original enough for that. However it is an audiovisual treat with good performances from all actors, competent cinematography and decent pace for its length. I expected more from a sequel to one of the best scifi movies of all time, but that bar was too high to reach in the first place.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

mintloOct 6, 2017

I have to admit I wasn't asking for a Blade Runner sequel, and when I heard they were doing one my expectations were rock bottom. I was pleasantly surprised and I enjoyed it. I appreciate how the story was simple, there was more focus onI have to admit I wasn't asking for a Blade Runner sequel, and when I heard they were doing one my expectations were rock bottom. I was pleasantly surprised and I enjoyed it. I appreciate how the story was simple, there was more focus on visuals and 'showing' rather than explaining and talking. I got sucked in to the movie and forgot about reality for 146 minutes which was nice.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

8

judahjsnOct 6, 2017

If anything is deserving of a 10 it's this film because it perfectly achieves everything they could have wanted to achieve by making this movie and everything you could hope for as a fan of the original. It's dripping with style and weirdnessIf anything is deserving of a 10 it's this film because it perfectly achieves everything they could have wanted to achieve by making this movie and everything you could hope for as a fan of the original. It's dripping with style and weirdness and completely unafraid of taking chances and being its own animal, while still somehow maintaining a faithful nod to the spirit of the original in countless ways. I can't think of another sequel that was done this well. This will change the bar for what fans can expect from the resurrection of their favorite properties. Oh, and cinematographer Roger Deakins (nominated for an oscar 13 times but never took one home) is finally winning this year.… Expand

12 of 24 users found this helpful1212

All this user's reviews

8

dharmaDec 26, 2017

Blade Runner 2019 is the ultimate fan film. On that level it works incredibly well. It answers all the riddles posed on the first film while offering new ones (possibly for another sequel). It also has incredible effects and cinematographyBlade Runner 2019 is the ultimate fan film. On that level it works incredibly well. It answers all the riddles posed on the first film while offering new ones (possibly for another sequel). It also has incredible effects and cinematography that will probably net this an Oscar nomination. Yet there lies its ultimate weakness: it is not an accessible film. If you haven't seen the first one, forget about understanding this flick. It is also bladder busting long at 2 hours and 45 minutes. It is a film that is budgeted for cinema, but can only be savored in home video (a bit like the original's 'faith'). This is why studios sometimes are reluctant to 'please the fans' too much. At the end of the day, they are not enough to make back the film's enormous budget.… Expand

5 of 21 users found this helpful516

All this user's reviews

8

SpangleOct 10, 2017

A little under a year ago, I declared Denis Villeneuve to be my favorite modern director in my review of Arrival. Now, with Blade Runner 2049, Villeneuve confirms my assertion and furthers my belief that Roger Deakins is the best modernA little under a year ago, I declared Denis Villeneuve to be my favorite modern director in my review of Arrival. Now, with Blade Runner 2049, Villeneuve confirms my assertion and furthers my belief that Roger Deakins is the best modern cinematographer. Put the two together and poetic, thoughtful, and visual magic happens. Blade Runner 2049 is the perfect embodiment of this with the two combining to bring forth a film that stands as one of the best of 2017 to date. Gorgeous, thoughtful, and brilliantly unraveling at a methodical-but-not-slow pace, Blade Runner 2049 is a film that makes me want to revisit the original, after having absolutely loathed it three years ago (I saw the Final Cut so do not even bring up the different cuts). Now, as my own journey through cinema alters, I am in a position to enjoy and bask in the glory that is Blade Runner with 2049, Villeneuve, and Deakins, being the gateway. Blending Tarkovsky influences, Tarkovsky religion, and the story of Blade Runner, Blade Runner 2049 is a thought-provoking work that goes well beyond the essential question of; are replicants equal and deserve to live or are they sub-human?

That said, the philosophy and ideas certainly take a backseat to the work of Roger Deakins. Watching Blade Runner 2049 is akin to being able to watch a painter work on his masterpiece, marrying warm oranges with cold blues, hues of pink, and shades of green, all in the name of creating a smorgasbord of beauty that stands as a testament to both the skill of Deakins in shooting a film and his ability to use color to tell a story. In terms of just the visuals themselves, however, the gorgeous reliance on silhouettes as Agent K (Ryan Gosling) walks out of white, billowing smoke and as Agent K walks through the orange wasteland that is Las Vegas, demonstrate some of this beauty. As do shots of Gosling walks through the cold blues and greens of Los Angeles, the dark ships flying through the orange air of Vegas, the white light of a ship with orange taillights against the dark black sky, the shot of a dog staring into the distance as its master is gone, a fire burning bright orange in the dark of the night, a blind man walking out of the shadows into the orangeish hue of temple, a car pulling into a snowy and green-walled parking garage with its red brakes beaming off the ground, and a glowing pink hologram with blue hair bending over to talk to Agent K and bringing with her the pink radiance surrounding her and blending it with the dark blue aura about him. This is a film with no shot out of place, no moment that is not striking, and more than anything else, this is a testament to Deakins. Turning colors into a visual mosaic of mastery and the simple beauty of the colors themselves, Blade Runner 2049 - before the year is even over - is the most visually stunning work of 2017. There can is no debate. Few films paint such a brilliant picture that words seem to fall short of truly expressing.

Perhaps one of the greatest displays of the film's brilliant visuals comes in how it uses the colors within its palette and also its locales/sets. As an agent for the Los Angeles Police Department, Agent K is tasked with hunting down replicants. He himself was synthetically made, but is a model who cannot rebel and made after the blackout, thus, is tasked with killing replicants who may still wish to rebel. While fully obedient, he is nonetheless an outsider. At home, he finds his front door has been vandalized to say "Die Skinner". Prostitutes are wary of him due to his status as a Blade Runner. The only one who accepts him is Joi (Ana de Armas), who is girlfriend and also a hologram made as a companion for him. As he walks the streets of Los Angeles, it is constantly raining or snowing with cold blues, greens, and purples, abounding through the streets. At work, the walls are flat white and his own demeanor his cold and repressed. Joi brings him joy, but limited given the fact that she is not real and they cannot touch. His existence is one that sees him kill replicants, who he feels a connection to, but he does as he is told. For Agent K, his life is one of coldness and repression. As such, his environment embodies exactly this. Cold and unwelcoming, the cold colors found in Los Angeles define Agent K as a man who lives on the outside. This is not his home, nor is he welcome in Los Angeles. He is a man in a foreign land with no fire to warm his chilly exterior.

By direct contrast, Agent K finally finds his people and his cause in Las Vegas. As a post-apocalyptic and radioactive city, Las Vegas is covered in a thick haze that is turned a burnt orange due to the orange, burned out sky above. Left behind as Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) is whisked away by Luv (Sylvia Hoeks), Agent K finds himself surrounded by replicants. Taken to the underground compound, surrounded by those like himself, and a warm orange fire, Agent K has finally found where he is meant to be.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

8

RuslanDZEOct 9, 2017

When I watched Original Blade Runner at my childhood years I was not impressed by a movie. Then before watching BR2049 I watched it again. And I understood why people love it and many directors and creators were inspired by that. So I wasWhen I watched Original Blade Runner at my childhood years I was not impressed by a movie. Then before watching BR2049 I watched it again. And I understood why people love it and many directors and creators were inspired by that. So I was excited to see it now and good that I do not have nostalgia for an original one, since I watched it just recently. First at all, VISUALS. Denis Villeneuve and operator worked one the best looking movies. And visuals are masterly emphasize futuristic objects/ SCI Fi elements. I loved that like an original movie, future here represent in a really realistic way. You believe that in few decades we may live like that. And I can say that about whole movie. It feels down to earth. Nothing feels fake. Soundtrack is wonderful and it relates to the action very well. Ryan Gosling is a very good. Sci Fi Noir is very rare genre in movie industry and you have to watch this movie If you are movie nerd. Only doensides I have. That is eventually, movie falls flat. Some story lines do not have any progression. Jared Leto is wasted. And overall it does not make you think a lot. Well, it may be just a start and we will see an another sequel.… Expand

6 of 23 users found this helpful617

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Nov 7, 2017

Director Denis Villeneuve continues his hot streak of stunning films with a sequel to one of cinema's - strike that - art's most influential pieces of expression. "Blade Runner 2049" is a mesmerizing plot-thickener with just enough intrigueDirector Denis Villeneuve continues his hot streak of stunning films with a sequel to one of cinema's - strike that - art's most influential pieces of expression. "Blade Runner 2049" is a mesmerizing plot-thickener with just enough intrigue to keep you hooked until the film's incredible final act. Let's not forget the unmistakably beautiful production design and cinematography, ultimately rendering this final product into what I believe to be 2017's best looking motion picture. A real wondrous feat that's left me salivating for whatever Villeneuve's got cooking up for next time.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

8

TimW001Nov 1, 2017

A beautiful sci-fi movie and a fantastic addition to the genre. The movie has outstanding colour use and cinematography. Also is able to tell a complex story with twists. Without rubbing it in the audience's face we all get the story. TheA beautiful sci-fi movie and a fantastic addition to the genre. The movie has outstanding colour use and cinematography. Also is able to tell a complex story with twists. Without rubbing it in the audience's face we all get the story. The movie is also not afraid of the long shot with no interruptions. I recommend seeing this movie.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

mbeckfordOct 18, 2020

Denis Villeneuve can make top-tier science fiction flicks. A visual spectacle and worthy sequel to the classic original.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

FranzHcriticOct 8, 2017

I've always held 'Blade Runner' as one of the greatest sci-fi films of all time. As a self-proclaimed film connoisseur, I believed a sequel to a film of such magnitude could never do it justice. However, I was proven (not totally) wrong withI've always held 'Blade Runner' as one of the greatest sci-fi films of all time. As a self-proclaimed film connoisseur, I believed a sequel to a film of such magnitude could never do it justice. However, I was proven (not totally) wrong with '2049'. It posed deep, meaningful questions of what it means to be human, to have emotions. The cinematography and score helped to match the atmosphere with the original in a way I never thought it would. My criticisms lie with the pace, and Gosling, who comes off as pedestrian. As a sequel though, it's an amazing movie.… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

8

marcmyworksOct 13, 2017

2049 is a deceiving film. It is very slow paced and atmospheric, which is in contrast to the original, which contained a lot more action and tension. Beautifully shot and acted, it nearly is set to be a perfect film, but where it fails is in2049 is a deceiving film. It is very slow paced and atmospheric, which is in contrast to the original, which contained a lot more action and tension. Beautifully shot and acted, it nearly is set to be a perfect film, but where it fails is in the length of certain scenes that do not add to character development.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

moviemitch96Oct 6, 2017

A film that definitely matched my expectations but didn't quite exceed them like I had hoped. Nonetheless, this film matches the quality and greatness of the original, and its scope is undeniably large and impressive, especially in terms ofA film that definitely matched my expectations but didn't quite exceed them like I had hoped. Nonetheless, this film matches the quality and greatness of the original, and its scope is undeniably large and impressive, especially in terms of the gorgeous visuals and always captivating cinematography from Roger Deakins (seriously, I'll be damned if this film isn't the one to finally get him that far overdue Oscar!) In addition, Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford deliver reliably strong performances! My only gripe is that the film's first act starts out so exciting and promisingly, then slows way down in the middle act, almost too slow if you ask me. I also thought there were quite a few scenes and instances in the middle act that could've easily been trimmed down a bit, and I also noticed that there were a few ideas and moments that felt borrowed from other recent sci-fi films, but then things got back into full gear to deliver a powerhouse final act that ended beautifully, leaving me wanting so much more and making me more than willing to forgive the nearly three-hour runtime. Overall, this should satisfy most fans of the original, as it boasts the visuals, cinematography, magnificent score (well done as always Hans Zimmer!) and thought-provoking themes and symbolism that made the original such a unique and innovative experience! Just beware of the runtime and a middle act that takes it time, but it's well worth it by end!… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

8

poewilsonOct 30, 2017

The P.H. Metric 78.75/100

During my showing 7 people walked out, and there was only probably 15 of us, and they made it no more 50 minutes in. Several people I went to the theater with fell asleep, yet critically applauded and here comes theThe P.H. Metric 78.75/100

During my showing 7 people walked out, and there was only probably 15 of us, and they made it no more 50 minutes in. Several people I went to the theater with fell asleep, yet critically applauded and here comes the divide. Movies critics love, film does not make money even when they have huge investment and movies critics don’t love film makes enough money to fund 5-15 more movies. So in short this film is a disservice, because ultimately fewer studios are willing to take the risk on artsy films and all this film needed was to tighten up its pacing and it would have probably broken even and in terms of cinematic vision that is hardly selling your soul.

Directing: 8.75/10

The directing is superb and I am shocked with the level of investment that Villeneuve was given as much control as he was. Though it must be said that this film draws out shots for too long and this is from a man who loved the film Stalker. Where as something like Stalker is completely about the philosophical nature this film still tries to make it self an action/thriller/mystery film and these long takes end up killing the mystery and feels more like there is not enough story to go around, which ultimately is true. The shots themselves are lovely.

Acting: 7/10

Ford is Ford the man is not that great of an actor and he really is just cashing in on old franchises at this point. Gosling’s muted touch was decent enough and while Leto’s weird character was weird in a good way the character itself was unneeded. The main villain of the piece was over the top and worthy of being in a film that is trying so hard to be nuanced. She ends up coming off as a jarring screeching noise.

Cinematography: 10/10

Deakins’s cinematography shines, absolutely shines and this has to be his year. 13 noms and with Lubezki currently attached to a special award Oscar his major comp for the year is not there.

Editing 8.5/10

I feel bad for Joe Walker he kept the ship as tight as he could throughout, but ultimately due to the nature of these long drawn out takes that it feels like he was ultimately overruled when it came to where to cut the film.

Score/sound effects: 5.5/10

I would have scored this higher if I had not seen Arrival, where as the industrial style sound design should have been more engaging I could not help feeling they were reusing it from Arrival. Of course the sounds were meant to be jarring given all the silence we were fed, but ultimately it feels like that opening sequence in the remake of Funny Games, it is not shocking or jarring in the sense the creator wants, but more in the sense please turn down the TV those noises are starting to give me a headache.

Visual Effects: 9/10

I get a sense of Silent Hill (the first game) it feels like the fog and dust in certain scenes is there to hide rather than enhance and when one goes back to the original Blade Runner these modern effects (specifically shots of the city) do not look like the technology has really pushed the boundaries, in fact it looks more like the status quo, which mind you the status quo is excellent, but not genre defining.

Writing: 3/10

I am sad to find out there was a writer for this film. Now I previously mentioned Stalker which is similar in many regards, however the dialogue in that is profound, where is the dialogue in Blade Runner 2049 thinks it is. With such cliche android film lines as basically sacrificing yourself is the way to prove you are human. This concept never sits well with me, as apparently for an android the most human thing is to sacrifice yourself so that the human may continue to live a better life than you. That sounds like the kind of thing an android would be programmed to do. Asimov anybody? Everything just keeps pushing the fact that these androids want to be human, but ultimately it keeps slapping them down and saying they are not. It adds nothing to the greater debate over AI and ultimately when compared to the sheer quality of everything else in the film it looks out of place and useless, as if someone was brought in last minute to patch it up. Secondly the whole it could be him story was let out of the back to early on, so it made the double twist so predictable that it steals any power it had.

Production Design: 9.5/10

Those in production design you all need more respect and deserve to be pushed further into the foreground, because when you do an excellent job no one says anything, only look how well this and that is, but you owned this film.

Costume Design 9/10

Well done, especially Leto’s character, though I will say the only real negative was Wright’s outfit. What is this 2049 and she is channeling the 50’s or was she literally a copy of the police chief from Futurama. Also Ford’s was a little meh.

Make-up/Hairstyle 8.5/10

Again Leto is the high point, but not much else as everything is high quality, but nothing feels astounding.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

Brent_MarchantOct 7, 2017

A long-awaited (and long-overdue) sequel to a legendary 1982 sci-fi classic that comes ever so close to nailing it save for a few elements that feel decidedly forced and...off. Stylistically beautiful and imaginative, impeccably well acted,A long-awaited (and long-overdue) sequel to a legendary 1982 sci-fi classic that comes ever so close to nailing it save for a few elements that feel decidedly forced and...off. Stylistically beautiful and imaginative, impeccably well acted, and incredibly intelligent in its narrative, the film hits many of the right notes right on the head. It's especially impressive that the film does not place an overreliance on special effects or action sequences to carry the story. However, several unduly intrusive subplots and narrative twists that clearly seem to be aimed at setting up another sequel dilute and impinge upon this otherwise well-crafted story, preventing the film from reaching the true cinematic greatness it could have attained.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

8

SammifxOct 6, 2017

It is a technical masterpiece and I cant fault the direction. The script however introduces a lot of elements that are never explored and tied up - and the abrupt ending makes me wonder if this was a directors cut with a lot of unexploredIt is a technical masterpiece and I cant fault the direction. The script however introduces a lot of elements that are never explored and tied up - and the abrupt ending makes me wonder if this was a directors cut with a lot of unexplored stuff or if it needs a directors cut with 2 more hours of content that will explore all the elements. I wish more time was spent on character development outside of Gosling as well. The pacing and sense of urgency also felt off despite the gravity of what was happening.… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

8

section20mi6Jul 1, 2018

Much like it's predecessor but better, Villeneuve's take on Blade Runner recreates the original atmosphere, but also implements surprising twists and turns that do not bore the audience through the whole course of extensive run time.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

sscott0829twOct 11, 2017

Blade runner 2049 is beautiful and breathtaking. The characters are all well acting. The world is stunning and believable. This is not a action movie, is a normal story. That will make you think of it after you walk out of the theater. IBlade runner 2049 is beautiful and breathtaking. The characters are all well acting. The world is stunning and believable. This is not a action movie, is a normal story. That will make you think of it after you walk out of the theater. I didn't give this movie a higher score is because the slow paste and some plot that they didn't explain. Hope they make a third movie.… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

8

somedude14Oct 31, 2017

Has some pacing issues, especially near the end, but this was pretty good. Nailed the atmosphere of the original, even though the story isn't a retelling but an entirely new direction. Harrison Ford also put more effort into his performanceHas some pacing issues, especially near the end, but this was pretty good. Nailed the atmosphere of the original, even though the story isn't a retelling but an entirely new direction. Harrison Ford also put more effort into his performance as Rick Deckard here than he did as Han Solo in "The Force Awakens". Still the "old guy" showing up to pass the torch of the brand he helped build to the next generation by being recast in the same role to give it more credibility (not that this movie needed him, but it certainly doesn't hurt), but he definitely put more juice into this role. Maybe Han is a money thing to him and Deckard is more important - after all, Ford *did* want Han to be dead for good after the events in Star Wars: Episode 5.

Jared Leto puts in an uncharacteristically calm performance here. I would've liked to see his character get more development so he could have more screen time.

Would love to get a modern point-and-click game in this new universe - the only downside to this idea is Westwood isn't around to do it proper justice, so maybe it's better if that doesn't happen!… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

RalfbergsMar 5, 2021

I liked this one better than the first one. Mainly because plot was more interesting and had more twists to it. Also of course for me this is more futuristic watching now than watching first Blade Runner, which I saw first time only this year.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

CineAutoctonoOct 8, 2017

"Blade Runner 2049" was a very good film, the special effects and story were amazing, and as long as the performances were great. Ryan Gosling was very good in his role, we see again Harrison Ford, playing Rick Deckard, and Ford does not"Blade Runner 2049" was a very good film, the special effects and story were amazing, and as long as the performances were great. Ryan Gosling was very good in his role, we see again Harrison Ford, playing Rick Deckard, and Ford does not fail, this movie has been one of the biggest and one of the best this year.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

8

MrWonderfulOct 23, 2017

The original Blade Runner is still my overall favourite movie so far in time. I went into 2049 with high hopes. It met my expectations but does not surpass the original as I thought it would. The story is good, especially once the second halfThe original Blade Runner is still my overall favourite movie so far in time. I went into 2049 with high hopes. It met my expectations but does not surpass the original as I thought it would. The story is good, especially once the second half commences and a big plot reveal is made. Visuals are astounding and makes up for the length of the film. I felt the movie could have gone longer and I would have remained interested because of the cinematography and excellent acting. The only real let down for me is the musical score, it just didn't contain the same emotive vibe as Vangelis' provided in the original. To me Blade Runner breathes life because of that amazing soundtrack whereas 2049 was too low key and decidedly similar to many another sci-fi movies of recent years such as Oblivion and Interstellar. I hope there will be a "Director's Cut" once released on 4K/Bluray. I also hope one day Blade Runner will evolve into a story that includes the mysterious Off World location(s) that the to films elude to.

I'm glad I saw 2049 on the big screen.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

8

BitashJun 3, 2018

Very entertaining, good visuals and I liked the story line, I didn't love the caring however I still found it interesting enough to keep watching, don't be picky and enjoy it for what it is, it will entertain you.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeOct 6, 2017

The very surprising fact how this sequel, 35 years later from the original's release, manages to take the things very lovable about its predecessor and make them a lot better for the modern people. The long 35-year wait is finally over. YouThe very surprising fact how this sequel, 35 years later from the original's release, manages to take the things very lovable about its predecessor and make them a lot better for the modern people. The long 35-year wait is finally over. You can go in and out with a hyped face because this sure is going to be a movie you got to see for yourself to feel the real experience.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

8

InActionMan64Oct 10, 2017

Totally worth it. Feels like BR, looks like BR, sounds like BR. Yes, there's sequel setup but its subtle and non-invasive to the story. As to the sexism angle, this is an elseworlds setting with non-humans, there are things that look humanTotally worth it. Feels like BR, looks like BR, sounds like BR. Yes, there's sequel setup but its subtle and non-invasive to the story. As to the sexism angle, this is an elseworlds setting with non-humans, there are things that look human but aren't.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

8

HTGamerOct 6, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a great neo-noir science fiction epic.

Story is set some 30 years after the first movie, with Deckard (Harrison Ford) having disappeared. Replicant "K" (Ryan Gosling) is working as a Blade Runner for the LAPD and huntsBlade Runner 2049 is a great neo-noir science fiction epic.

Story is set some 30 years after the first movie, with Deckard (Harrison Ford) having disappeared. Replicant "K" (Ryan Gosling) is working as a Blade Runner for the LAPD and hunts down older Replicant models to "retire" them because they are viewed as a threat to humanity. "K" later discovers a truth that might shake the world's foundations, and investigates out of duty and curiosity.

The plot is full of surprises and twists. Ford's appearance in the final 3rd of the film is great, but Gosling is the protagonist, his character (even if artificial) is well expanded upon. Blade Runner isn't a film about a hero saving the world, but it tells a human story.

The film is also a masterful audiovisual experience no one should miss out on.

However not everything is perfect. The ambient soundtrack is mostly majestic but there were times when it was a cacophony and made me mad. The offworld colonies are mentioned in both Blade Runner films but we didn't see anything of them again. Finally there are some minor plot holes and nonsense moments (like in every film), but also a big one with the Revolution.

In the end, Blade Runner 2049 is a great sequel. The first Blade Runner, though unique and intriguing, was somewhat underwhelming and it only had the great "tears in the rain" monologue in the very end that made it a cult hit. Blade Runner 2049 has no such monumental moment, but it's an overall better (if not perfect) film than the first one.

There are talks about a sequel, I'd gladly see more Blade Runner films.… Expand

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

8

JyroJyroNov 10, 2017

An auditory & visual masterpiece that stays true to the original film whilst also feeling suitably futuristic and nuanced in a number of different ways. I did feel it was a little too ponderous at times, but this is still a seriouslyAn auditory & visual masterpiece that stays true to the original film whilst also feeling suitably futuristic and nuanced in a number of different ways. I did feel it was a little too ponderous at times, but this is still a seriously mesmerising sequel from Villeneuve.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

ranjan04rajeevDec 29, 2017

Overall the movie is enjoyable, with stunning visuals and great score. It lacks that punchy Hollywood action and buildup. But the movie sticks to its theme and genre and explores what it is to be human. It is definitely a critical masterpieceOverall the movie is enjoyable, with stunning visuals and great score. It lacks that punchy Hollywood action and buildup. But the movie sticks to its theme and genre and explores what it is to be human. It is definitely a critical masterpiece and surely be nominated for Academy awards.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

valerianOct 9, 2017

I’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this film taken a lot of inspiration from Baraka and Ghost in the Shell (1995).

Both films in my opinion, are perfect, for what they intended to aim, but they can be very straining for mostI’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this film taken a lot of inspiration from Baraka and Ghost in the Shell (1995).

Both films in my opinion, are perfect, for what they intended to aim, but they can be very straining for most viewers because it felt slow or confusing to watch. And both these films were barely an hour long.

This film very similar to these except, it has double the length time. And that can be straining for even really patient audiences.

Not for everyone, but to those who want to be immersed into such a well thought out, beautiful world, it’ll be up your ally.

This film needed better editing, especially at around the last 45 min mark though.

Really nice surprise! 8.9/10… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

8

KaptenVideoDec 24, 2017

A young blade runner's (Ryan Gosling) discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down older colleague (Harrison Ford), who's been missing for thirty years. In the future, there are people whose job is to find and kill human-likeA young blade runner's (Ryan Gosling) discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down older colleague (Harrison Ford), who's been missing for thirty years. In the future, there are people whose job is to find and kill human-like robots, you know, and they are called blade runners.

Also appearing, Jared Leto, Robin Wright, Dave Bautista, Ana de Armas, Sylvia Hoeks, Mackenzie Davis, David Dastmalchian et al.

The original „Blade Runner“ (1982) is lauded as one of the best and most important sci-fi movies ever. I have seen it, of course, even more than once, and read the Philip K. Dick’s story it’s based on, but never see the appeal, honestly. Was quite bored with it, actually.

So why do they like it so much? I am too lazy to research it on the interweb, so I am just gonna take a wild guess and offer that when it came out, it was a long-waited antidote to all the silly sci-fi movies craze that had ruled in the previous five years.

You see, throughout history sci-fi was always a „serious“ and artsy cinema genre but then „Star Wars“ (1977) came out and made huge amount of people want something different entirely.

So „Blade Runner“ was, for sci-fi geeks, a long-awaited return to form, with its moodiness, sombre atmosphere and deep philosophical questions such as what makes us „real“ anyway, and is human life more important than artificially created one.

„Blade Runner“ flopped in cinemas originally but over the years it has built an admirable cult following. And the fans are surely glad to know that the long-planned sequel is finally here and stays far away from mainstream fare, respecting its „serious“ roots and everything.

Yes, the trailers look spectacular and have plenty of rip-roaring action but the new „Blade Runner“ is all about returning to the form, easily supassing the original movie in every aspect, at least for yours truly.

Be warned: not only does it last for close to three hours, it’s so artsy that you may feel the need to go grab some junk food later. Just to, you know, compensate.

The story is slow, not too eventful, a few action setpieces, not much dialogue – and the existing sounds more like monologue than real natural conversation between persons.

Filled with futuristic landscapes and environments, the movie looks gorgeous but there’s a noticeble discord between viewer and characters/events. The experience is cold and disheartening by design, always keeping you at arms length, so to speak.

It does have Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford starring, but the result is far from perfect date movie… unless both are big movie lovers and/or loved the original „Blade Runner“.

You may also have trouble with understanding the backstory and certain things about the characters. It is even difficult to say whether everything is meant to feel so ambiguous, asking us to offer our own answers, or the makers have tried to remain as „artsy“ as possible. I think it’s meant to be that hard to grasp. It’s directed by Denis Villeneuve after all („Prisoners“, „Enemy“, „Sicario“, „Arrival“).

To be honest, the movie does not have any good reason to last for close to three hours, but at least it’s full of thoughtful and well-crafted material, not filler crap like many „event“ movies.

The main topics such as the future of artifical intellect and the value of life, especially human life versus the artificially created one, are intriguing if you are able to open up to the whole experience.

And if you manage to open up already, you may admire how spiritual this bleak and cold futuristic story can be at its core. I dug throught the symbolism evident in the story and found out that it is really about the importance of feelings – this is all you really have to get through life. Just what the spiritual systems have taught us for thousands of years.

There will be many who will feel turned offed by this approach, I am sure. For an expensive 150 million U.S. dollar movie, it sure tries its earnest not to be easily liked and digested.

But it’s gorgeous and after a while, you may notice that it really speaks to you. Some may dig the moodiness, or Gosling’s face, but there’s enough serious content beneath the surface.

For all it’s emotional distant-ness and terrifying length, „Blade Runner 2049“ is not my cup of tea, but I think it’s a noteworthy piece of modern art. Considering the hefty budget, it is also probably the most expensive piece of modern art ever made.

All in all, for what it is, the movie could not be better in any aspect. Except for maybe giving Leto a bigger role.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

PotaeSuprakitNov 19, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Blade Runner 2049 returns very few of the characters from the original film but they manage to breathe life into this movie through the new ones they created. Officer K isn't the most lively protagonist but he gets an eye-opening character arc that kept me involved. Deckard doesn't appear till later in the movie but he remains interesting and what they decide to do with him makes his appearance worthwhile. I also really liked some of the smaller supporting characters. Sapper really helps kick off the movie, what Joi represents is extremely emotional and Mariette is so mysterious that her involvement brings up more and more questions. Add in that Niander Wallace and Luv make for pretty menacing villains and you have a pretty well-rounded and fascinating script.

I don't think that the actors/actresses will be the focal point of the awards attention that this movie will get but that doesn't mean there aren't exemplary performances. Gosling is good as K, he's deliberately robotic and he accomplishes a lot through his subtlety. Harrison Ford isn't in the movie as much as I wanted him to be (he's still one of my all-time favourite actors) but he holds up his end. He works with Gosling well and they have a solid rapport. Surprisingly, I really liked Sylvia Hoeks. She stole a lot of her scenes and I thought she was great even acting against a stacked cast. Dave Bautista showed he has a lot more range than people give him credit for. Jared Leto is in a very Jared Leto role (deliberately weird and hard to understand) but he does it well and although he might be a little creepy, the guy is still a great actor. I also want to credit Ana de Armas, she was distinctly warm and she showed a lot more emotion than I had seen from her previously.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

BlakDak666Oct 18, 2017

I never had seen the first Blade Runner film in any of its versions, so when watching this film I was nervous that I would not understand certain parts that referenced it. Thankfully, the film does nods and respectfully grows from itsI never had seen the first Blade Runner film in any of its versions, so when watching this film I was nervous that I would not understand certain parts that referenced it. Thankfully, the film does nods and respectfully grows from its previous entry and sparingly gives those references.

The visuals and technology used in this is phenomenal and this makes it one of the most impressively shot and well constructed worlds and society I have seen in films for years. The technology is believable and the apocalyptic-like world Blade Runner presents is creative and yet relative to the viewer. The acting was pretty dam good with Ryan Gosling , Harrison Ford and a few other characters putting a really impressive display of emotions and realistic humanity to the scenes. The action is a bit low, but it serves to move the plot forward and can be somewhat unnerving to watch. If you were expecting constant action in a sci-fi noir film, you will be very disappointed.

While I think the film was shot excellently, the cast did a great job on acting, I feel the story and certain scenes could have been better improved or toned down. The running length of the film has become a sort of like a joke for critics and they are not wrong as it is nearly two and half hours. Certain scenes could have been cut out and shorten a bit to propel the plot forward much more effectively. A couple head scratches came from me when certain plots were revealed and felt some moments were sort of cheesy to boot, so I would say that going in to see this film has to be under a certain mindset and test in patience. If you like constant action and ADHD style pacing, you will not enjoy this movie. Blade Runner 2049 is a well done film that successfully stands as its own sequel rather than a copy and paste of the original. Its world and visuals are award winning excellent, the casting was pretty good and only through excessive use of scenes and certain confusing areas do I feel the only cons for this film. If you like films and appreciate art, you are required to see this film. If you like a good detective movie, this is a recommendation. If you seen the original Blade Runner and not this yet, you should as soon as possible. This will not get everyone on board loving it, but those who appreciate its world and film as art will relish in this films for years to come.… Expand

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

8

TwomblerOct 16, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Like many of us I've seen the original Blade Runner movie countless of times (Director's Cut is, by the way, the only version I acknowledge) but I've also read late Philip K. Dick's novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Unfortunately this movie isn't a masterpiece although director Villeneuve has left his mark to every frame. And those frames are beautiful!

Blade Runner 2049 will receive Academy Award for best cinematography without a doubt. But it will not receive such honours for its screenplay.

If you've read Dick's novel you may share my opinion which is that this movie totally dismisses its biggest catch, androids. Now we have an android Blade Runner which has a virtual girlfriend. We have also an blind oligarch who desires to spread his androids to the rest of the universe. We have a retired Blade Runner who's gone missing and at some point you'll have a deja vu regarding Harrison Ford if you have seen Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of The Crystal Skull. Heed my words!

It takes a bit too long to build the athmosphere for the plot twist and we spend too much time inside this android Blade Runners apartment. His female supervisor is also quite useless and I felt she was in the movie only to emphasize how heartless android villain can be. But then again, android doesn't have a heart.

Our protagonist does wonder if he's something more than a mere machine. However writers didn't had the courage to write a human character because there is a quite popular theory about Deckard being a android himself.

In conclusion Blade Runner 2049 is a great movie but unfortunately doesn't beat the original. If you like Villeneuves earlier works you'll love it and if you love Ryan Gosling you'll probably watch it more than once.… Expand

6 of 20 users found this helpful614

All this user's reviews

8

FlexedacornOct 23, 2017

The Blade Runner sequel was an unexpected surprise, seeing how the original is now over 30 years old. I have a love hate relationship for the original as it was a bit of a slow burn, but I respected it for its world building, uniqueThe Blade Runner sequel was an unexpected surprise, seeing how the original is now over 30 years old. I have a love hate relationship for the original as it was a bit of a slow burn, but I respected it for its world building, unique cinematography and great ending. That being said the sequel did a great job of building upon the already established mythos.
Blade Runner 2049 did not feel revolutionary to filmmaking, but was an overall very good Sci Fi film. The acting was great, most notably the performances by Sylvia Hoeks and Jared Leto. Both actors really stole the show for every scene they were in. Some audiences reviews stated the movie felt too long, but honestly the pacing felt fine to me. My only critique of the film is that it did not have the bizarre vibe of the original. Gone were the mini clockwork replicants, crazy night clubs and claustrophobic streets. This is less of a knock on the film and more of a nod to how much work went into making the original film.
Overall I recommend this film to any fan of Sci-Fi films or those who like the original 1982 film.… Expand

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

8

robertoiglesiasJan 13, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is a nice movie that can be slow, but will most likely put a smile on your face.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

MrNikitaTVNov 1, 2017

Бегущий по лезвию 2049- качественный и прекрасно сделанный фильм, не утративший дух оригинала. Это фильм с хорошим актерским составом и с неплохим сценарием и отличной картинкой. Что в фильме не понравился, так это слабый злодей и ляпы вБегущий по лезвию 2049- качественный и прекрасно сделанный фильм, не утративший дух оригинала. Это фильм с хорошим актерским составом и с неплохим сценарием и отличной картинкой. Что в фильме не понравился, так это слабый злодей и ляпы в сюжете. В целом фильм отличный, всем рекомендую идти!… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

FonkeOct 28, 2017

Great movie, really enjoyed watching it. The movie was a bit too long for my liking, but but the music and acting is on point. Definitely worth watching.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

FillTheAndroidOct 30, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Yes, they do. So the film says, not the book. And new part of the Blade Runner continues the story of those who have souls, even if they're nothing more but replicants. Deep loud music written by Hans Zimmer with bright neon pictures of the future draws this world you'd never want to live in, but the world you'd want to take a look at. Blade runners still chasing replicants, replicats still trying to save their lifes. But now there's a greatest goal in this world. Replicants need to find a messiah, who will lead them to the freedom.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

BBQTuckOct 9, 2017

To keep it simple, Blade Runner 2049 is a visually stunning neo-noir sci-fi film. If you see it in the theater, don't get a drink because the 2 hr and 44 minute run time will surely lead to a mid-movie piss break.

Overall the film is moody,To keep it simple, Blade Runner 2049 is a visually stunning neo-noir sci-fi film. If you see it in the theater, don't get a drink because the 2 hr and 44 minute run time will surely lead to a mid-movie piss break.

Overall the film is moody, heavy, deliberate and did I mention it was long? Ryan Gosling does his typical Ryan Gosling thing where he kind of skulks around with an blank look on his face, but it somehow looks cool. Imagine his character from "Drive", but somehow with an even cooler jacket. Harrison Ford continues to do his excellent "grumpy reprisals" of classic roles, and he handles this role about as well as he handled Han Solo in "The Force Awakens". The plot is solid, but nothing that will blow you away, and the setting of the film along with the soundtrack seem to be what's stuck in your head after viewing instead of the actual events that take place in the film. There's also Robin Wright Penn providing exposition, a hologram waifu, sequel bait, and Dave Bautista. Despite having a massive budget, there is no giant action set-piece scene in the third act, so don't go in expecting one, but to be honest it really wouldn't fit with the tone of this movie. There is however a beautifully crafted scene involving a sinking car that will give you an anxiety attack. Long story short. See this movies in theaters if you can stomach the giant run-time. It's an absolute treat on the eyes and ears, and Gosling and Ford provide excellent performances that prop up an fine but mostly serviceable plot.… Expand

6 of 17 users found this helpful611

All this user's reviews

8

VoloxiOct 6, 2017

As someone who loved the original, I'm very happy this movie was made. But I have to say that all the grandeur that this movie is and represents is ruined by one simple thing. Ryan Gosling. Oh yes, he at first seems like the obvious choiceAs someone who loved the original, I'm very happy this movie was made. But I have to say that all the grandeur that this movie is and represents is ruined by one simple thing. Ryan Gosling. Oh yes, he at first seems like the obvious choice for the roll, I see that. Except that he plays the same character in all his movies; a person who expresses nothing. You can shoot him, stab him, kick him square in the balls, and the most you'll ever get as a reaction is that faint, quirky smile he's so known for. Personally, I don't see any difference between his characters, and how he behaves as a person off-camera. And I want to like him. I really do. But when he's put next to any other actor in the film, especially someone like the charismatic Harrison Ford, his brooding sense of quiet falls flat. When they told him he was to play a robot, did he envision something from a 50's sci-fi classic? All he needs are the short jerky movements and some beeps and boops and there it is. And Jared Leto is just as guilty. His calm and cool sociopathic representation of corporate owner just did not bring anything to the performance. Villian 101: you have to almost like them and fall to their charms to truly despise them when they are bad. In this respect, the original still wins out as the better film in my opinion.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

8

soydansilvaOct 25, 2017

visually glorious, intense and dark; this direct sequel to 'Blade Runner' works as a futuristic journey with a mixture of nostalgia, but ultimately disappoints with a basic and repeated story - "more a machine than a person"

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

superproblemOct 29, 2017

typical slightly prolonged movie w/ Gosling. you can easily not watch a 1982 film, if you look at the prologue. Gosling is a god. symbols symbols symbols xd.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

kiankFeb 18, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is a visually stunning movie. It is the most beautiful movie I've seen since Interstellar. That being said, I wasn't a fan of the pace of story and felt like it dragged on a bit. Don't get me wrong, I think the story isBlade Runner 2049 is a visually stunning movie. It is the most beautiful movie I've seen since Interstellar. That being said, I wasn't a fan of the pace of story and felt like it dragged on a bit. Don't get me wrong, I think the story is good but the pace of it was too slow at some points. Overall, I would give it a 8.1.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

JohnvincentDec 21, 2017

This movie was visually amazing. The sound in the theater was hard to sit through however. I hope it was just the theaters sound system.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

LoletinAlexisSep 8, 2018

The sequel that we all expected. Excellent, although inferior to the unsurpassed Blade Runner of 1982

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

timpfelFeb 17, 2018

A good sequel to the original Blade Runner with excellent visuals - but is to long, the main villain is not that interesting and Deckard doesn't do much in the movie. Also music is better in original movie.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

AndrewBurgeMay 17, 2018

In essence, Denis Villeneuve's 'Blade Runner 2049' aims to up the ante on its original film. Everything is taken to a larger and broader scale. And this, most of the time, is a good thing. It improves upon all the technical elements andIn essence, Denis Villeneuve's 'Blade Runner 2049' aims to up the ante on its original film. Everything is taken to a larger and broader scale. And this, most of the time, is a good thing. It improves upon all the technical elements and directorial techniques of the original, although losing a bit of focus in the process.

Overall, though, this is a really pretty film. Thanks, in a very large part to legendary cinematographer Roger Deakins' bold imagery and cutting edge luxurious filming techniques; but also thanks to Villeneuve's directorial chops. He borrows, from the original film, the method of presenting us a world drowned in gigantic buildings, surrounded by choking industrialism filled with commercials to gigantic brands and sexual fantasies. It succeeds in building on the idea of showing us a utopic life beyond the slums of Earth and brilliantly creates a personal story with bold plot twists. And like the imagery and the futuristic and roaring soundtrack, the story revolves around hope.

The characters, like 'K' (Ryan Gosling), the silent and collected blade runner, Joshi (Robin Wright) the imposing Police Chief and most others are emptied of feelings and there is a certain coldness between them. This is not an issue, but an observation, as this emotional separation reflects perfectly the tone of the film. Sure, there are a few characters which offer more emotion, like Deckard (Harrison Ford) who is the most human character of them all and also has his own personal motives and regrets. And then there is Niander Wallace (Jared Leto), a powerful CEO of a company making a new generation of replicants; although he looks imposing, his appearances are not only brief, but his character comes along as pretentious, constantly babbling in a Shakespearean manner about his goals and motives.

Despite this slightly wasted villain and pacing which could have been sped up on certain occasions, making this film a bit shorter, 'Blade Runner 2049' is a beautifully designed experiment in the philosophy of futurism; ideas like the humanity of machines and even a few ironic references to virtual reality. Of course, we've heard these all before, but this really does not matter when you have such a brilliant execution.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Snowden111Feb 7, 2020

Let me get perhaps one of the best elements of this film out of the way, the visuals. The visuals in this film are amazing. This movie is worth watching just because of the visuals. The acting is also amazing, Ryan Gosling is a fantasticLet me get perhaps one of the best elements of this film out of the way, the visuals. The visuals in this film are amazing. This movie is worth watching just because of the visuals. The acting is also amazing, Ryan Gosling is a fantastic actor. But this film feels over stuffed and might have been better as a tv show because there were so many plot lines and characters that it was overwhelming. There was so much going on that when the big reveal happened I didn't care because there was no setup. This movie also felt weirdly pretentious. Overall this movie was well made and had great acting.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

johnnywilliamMay 24, 2020

Um bom filme.. com efeitos especiais muito bons.. mas o roteiro é mais ou menos..

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

OnaskOct 21, 2018

Me gusta mucho más todo el universo y la ambientación del clásico de 1982, pero esta gana en gran medida en otros muchos apartados, como personajes mil veces más carismáticos e interesantes, la dirección de la acción y una trama mucho másMe gusta mucho más todo el universo y la ambientación del clásico de 1982, pero esta gana en gran medida en otros muchos apartados, como personajes mil veces más carismáticos e interesantes, la dirección de la acción y una trama mucho más elaborada. Mantiene un universo espectacular, al igual que la música, pero creo que no a la altura de la obra original de Ridley Scott.

Gosling funciona de manera sorprendente y de nuevo da un golpe en la mesa quitándose todos los prejuicios que le llevan asignando durante años. Película muy disfrutable (especialmente para los fans del género de ciencia ficción) y muy recomendada.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Kirollos-NoahNov 29, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is definitely a great movie, it was only missing some stuff. Those stuff didn't blow up the movie, but they annoyed me though!

The soundtrack was totally annoying and in some important scene like the final fight (the oneBlade Runner 2049 is definitely a great movie, it was only missing some stuff. Those stuff didn't blow up the movie, but they annoyed me though!

The soundtrack was totally annoying and in some important scene like the final fight (the one between Luv and Officer K), actually, most of the fights, there wasn't any music, it really really annoyed me, I really expected more from Hans Zimmer!
The surprising element was totally poor.
Sometimes the movie was hard to digest.

But on the other hand, it kept the excitement that I want and need to see in any movie.
The performance was impressive, I didn't expect that actually, but the cast surprised and got me into the movie.
The CGI was mistake-less.
There wasn't a lot of action scenes, but the action scenes -as it's not too much- were really thrilling!
The story was good.
And most important thing, that this movie did not get me bored in any second.

So it was really good and catching. I loved that brilliant movie! So I'm gonna give it an A-.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

helorareygaysDec 11, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is a great movie, maybe not as good as the original but still holds the viewer with a good plot, performance, direction and a beautifull cinematography but i found it a bit too contemplative

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

Blade Runner 2049

User Reviews