Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: October 6, 2017
8.3
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 2670 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
2,297
Mixed:
169
Negative:
204
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
Obstinate177May 15, 2021
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
Tendril28May 29, 2021
&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=&=
&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+&+
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
ReceptacleJun 22, 2021
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
Abso_lute1Jul 14, 2021
A visually stunning, beautifully shot, and absolutely gorgeous cinematography, Blade Runner 2049 is mesmerizing as well as narratively satisfying.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
hunterlizeJul 22, 2021
I though that I wouldn't like the movie, to be honest. But, then, I let it play and wow... Found out it was really beautiful and intense, with an amazing cyberpunk vibe, showing a future that could be real. I had happy moments and some otherI though that I wouldn't like the movie, to be honest. But, then, I let it play and wow... Found out it was really beautiful and intense, with an amazing cyberpunk vibe, showing a future that could be real. I had happy moments and some other I was left hanging in anxiety and the plot was very well constructed in my view. Very well done! Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
KitzuuJun 18, 2023
Stunning, beautiful, realistic, amazing. This movie portraits possible problems of the future world so well. Besides, good storyline.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Celestial91Sep 15, 2021
Mixed reviews 160, Negative Reviews 183, Positive Reviews 2,094. 343 of these reviews are incorrect. Blade Runner 2049 is easily one of the perfect sequels to a Classic Sci Fi action opus. Blade Runner 2 is an instant classic from one of theMixed reviews 160, Negative Reviews 183, Positive Reviews 2,094. 343 of these reviews are incorrect. Blade Runner 2049 is easily one of the perfect sequels to a Classic Sci Fi action opus. Blade Runner 2 is an instant classic from one of the savviest directors working in Hollywood these days. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
HeroicAge616Oct 25, 2021
One of the rare sequels that transcends the original, Blade Runner 2049 is a work of art that sits among the greatest films ever created.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
MantasRantasNov 18, 2021
Given Hollywood's usual approach to blockbuster sequels, I'm astonished this film turned out as well as it did. A rare case of a sequel being superior to it's predecessor, it masterfully expands on the themes of the original, boasts anGiven Hollywood's usual approach to blockbuster sequels, I'm astonished this film turned out as well as it did. A rare case of a sequel being superior to it's predecessor, it masterfully expands on the themes of the original, boasts an amazing cast, enriches the world of the franchise, has arguably Roger Deakins' best work as cinematographer and a brilliant soundtrack by Benjamin Wallfisch and Hans Zimmer. Depending on your preferences and parameters, this could be considered a perfect film. It certainly is for me. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ChanekeCholoDec 13, 2021
Blade Runner 2049 looks like the most expensive film ever made. It really feels like all that places, events and characters exists, Denis Villeneuve transforms his complex writing (Incendies, Maelstrom and August 32nd on Earth) to a new stepBlade Runner 2049 looks like the most expensive film ever made. It really feels like all that places, events and characters exists, Denis Villeneuve transforms his complex writing (Incendies, Maelstrom and August 32nd on Earth) to a new step into the complexity of the audiovisual field. This is the most undervalued film event of all time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
21rioDec 27, 2021
Seeing the original Blade Runner wasn't my thing on how good it was but this film has proven itself to be the best of all. To any of those people who are Blade Runner fans I'm really sure that you would enjoy much of rewatching this movie forSeeing the original Blade Runner wasn't my thing on how good it was but this film has proven itself to be the best of all. To any of those people who are Blade Runner fans I'm really sure that you would enjoy much of rewatching this movie for most of your times thinking how brilliant it gets within every inch of the writing, the editing, cinematography, sound, score, design, casting, and even the effects. This film expands and grows what came before. It’s a deep, rich, smart film that’s visually awesome and full of great sci-fi concepts, and one that was better than the original movie from Ridley Scott. To be real I'd applaud Denis Villeneuve on making an amazing sci-fi film this better than any sci-fi films in the filming industry in Hollywood. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DarkwingSchmuckMar 8, 2022
A sci-fi masterpiece, and one of the few sequels to a classic that improves upon its predecessor in nearly every way. Denis Villeneuve once again proves he is one of the top directors currently working within the Hollywood system.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Kingly01Mar 5, 2022
A very philosophical sci-fi with breathtaking visual storytelling and ncredible atmosphere.
it leaves you thinking just like the first one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
HeroponXCApr 28, 2022
best movie ever made. Ryan Gosling does such a great preformance in this film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
siggi104Jul 8, 2022
It's one of those movies that just work. Can't think of a negative point that's noteworthy. 1ß/10 cinematography so I gave it an extra point.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JJTorrensJul 16, 2022
A total MASTERPIECE!

One of the best sequels ever made, with an excellent story, great cast and performances and beautiful cinematography.
One of my favorite movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ArTyOm1991Jul 24, 2022
Фильм пиздат. Одобряем ребенка аутиста. Прекрасно, захотел прочитать бледный огонь от самого либертарианского писателя России после просмотра. Баба с плаката в наших сердцах И ВООБЩЕ ЖДЕМ ФИЛЬМ БАРБИ 2023. УЖЕ В ИЮЛЕ СЛЕДУЮЩЕГО ГОДА.Фильм пиздат. Одобряем ребенка аутиста. Прекрасно, захотел прочитать бледный огонь от самого либертарианского писателя России после просмотра. Баба с плаката в наших сердцах И ВООБЩЕ ЖДЕМ ФИЛЬМ БАРБИ 2023. УЖЕ В ИЮЛЕ СЛЕДУЮЩЕГО ГОДА.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MrNikYMay 20, 2023
The thought of not being able to watch it again, like the first time, throws me in cold...
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Melo138Apr 22, 2023
Achei o filme incrível, o personagem principal, as cores, a temática futurista e sua história, o lado ruim é que o filme é bem longo mas fora isso muito bom
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
fuor22May 31, 2023
this film is one of the best films I have ever watched. The story is riveting, the acting is great, and the visuals are stunning too.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Stanley3563May 17, 2023
the greatest cinematic marvel the world has ever seen, yet again carried by the grand master gos.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
kheasOct 8, 2017
Having grown up in the 80's and 90's I was exposed to many amazing films.   Films that set the stage for the cinema we now know.  Groundbreaking themes, visuals, sound and more.   The original film, Blade Runner, was one of these films andHaving grown up in the 80's and 90's I was exposed to many amazing films.   Films that set the stage for the cinema we now know.  Groundbreaking themes, visuals, sound and more.   The original film, Blade Runner, was one of these films and when a sequel was (finally) officially announced, I was both delighted and skeptical of this new film. Having seen it today, I am pleased to announce that I feel it was the perfect sequel, flaws and all. for more: http://wp.me/p93it6-Ik Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
9
SirwootalotOct 6, 2017
This is the closest thing we will ever have to a new movie by Andrei Tarkovsky.
The slow, deliberate pacing is crucial; it is meditative and entrancing, and the scenes between K and his "wife" are thoroughly Lynchian in their drawn-out
This is the closest thing we will ever have to a new movie by Andrei Tarkovsky.
The slow, deliberate pacing is crucial; it is meditative and entrancing, and the scenes between K and his "wife" are thoroughly Lynchian in their drawn-out intense discomfort.

I don't want to spoil too much, but there is a gun battle in a special sort of abandoned room - and it just might be the most bizarre, haunting, and perfect scene in Sci-fi cinema since the 1970s.

The only things holding me back from giving a perfect 10/10 are that the music, while very good, wasn't as "Vangelis-ey" as I would have liked - and that Jared Leto's performance stands out as being very awkward and overwrought in a movie that is otherwise a broiling ocean of wordless emotion and memory.
Expand
11 of 21 users found this helpful1110
All this user's reviews
9
GreggorDec 21, 2017
Blade Runner 2049 is a shining successor to the original. It stays true to the first movie in almost every way. While there were a few dry sections toward the beginning, the overall design of the film begins to dawn on you toward the end. IBlade Runner 2049 is a shining successor to the original. It stays true to the first movie in almost every way. While there were a few dry sections toward the beginning, the overall design of the film begins to dawn on you toward the end. I reconsidered my entire opinion of this movie from a negative to a positive one somewhere past the halfway point. I hope the success of this one means many more additions to the Blade Runner universe. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
currer_bellOct 13, 2017
It's not quite the instant classic the first movie was, but it was nearly impossible to do so anyway. This new Blade runner a an excellent movie nonetheless. I've read some bad reviews before watching the film and was kinda sceptical, but inIt's not quite the instant classic the first movie was, but it was nearly impossible to do so anyway. This new Blade runner a an excellent movie nonetheless. I've read some bad reviews before watching the film and was kinda sceptical, but in the end this movie is about as good a sequel can get. The visuals obviously are astonishing, the music is creepy and moody, and the story is gripping, good enough for me. Still It has some weaker moments, especially the last 20-30 minutes. The movie then become a bit messy and schizophrenic. But It's those crucial last 20 minutes that would have made Blade Runner 2049 a masterpiece like the first, but it kinda miss the spot. I also didn't like the Jared Leto character, the guru who speaks in parabolas and metaphors...it felt a bit cliché to me. Despite all that i can't give a lower score than 9, since the movie overall really lives up to the expectations. It's the kind movie I will watch 5-6 times without getting tired, this Blade Runner universe is just too fascinating. Expand
7 of 9 users found this helpful72
All this user's reviews
9
RoosterJuiceOct 7, 2017
Best creative direction since Mad Max: Fury Road. Like Mad Max it improves on the world building and aesthetics of the original. Such amazing visuals, soundtrack and direction. If you do not like movies that are a dramatic slow burn (like theBest creative direction since Mad Max: Fury Road. Like Mad Max it improves on the world building and aesthetics of the original. Such amazing visuals, soundtrack and direction. If you do not like movies that are a dramatic slow burn (like the original Blade Runner) it will not be for you. Creepy, weird, brooding, dark, and mindbogglingly creative.
This is a truly rare science fiction world that the directors and writers take extremely seriously, reminiscent of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Expand
8 of 16 users found this helpful88
All this user's reviews
9
jdb26354Oct 6, 2017
First time I saw the original Blade Runner (“2019”), I just stayed in my seat at the theater until the next showing and watched it again. I taped the movie at the theater to have the soundtrack, whose official version wasn’t released forFirst time I saw the original Blade Runner (“2019”), I just stayed in my seat at the theater until the next showing and watched it again. I taped the movie at the theater to have the soundtrack, whose official version wasn’t released for years. These facts put me in a 0.1% slice of fans of the movie.
So what to say of Blade Runner 2049 (“2049”)?
2019 pulled you into a world and a mood. The opening scene of Los Angeles in 2019 is not matched in 2049.
Making a virtue of necessity, Ridley Scott set 2019 at night (except for the controversial ending scene), which is cheaper to convey in the grimly grand manner he sought. Denis Villeneuve had the budget to venture into the day, which pays off best at the end, with the rest resting in an uneasy truce with sepia. The plot of 2019 was pedestrian; I think a Harrison Ford quote can be found that he played a detective who did not detect much. The plot of 2049 is hardly elaborate, but is more developed and satisfactory. Gosling is a god, and 2019 fans owe him a great debt for his embrace of the project despite the cult. 2019 actually aspired to the epic more in portrayal than in theme. 2049 has greater pretense to the epic—I spoil nothing, just watch the trailer (“the world is built on a wall that separates kind”). 2049 settles for less, but less ends up more. 2049 has a cracker jack supporting cast, although none delivers a line like Rutger Hauer’s “tears in the rain” from 2019. That’s what makes magic magic.
I’m glad that age and 2019’s cult status brought Harrison Ford back to the wisdom of his original choice to play Deckard. Sometimes you don’t give your younger self enough credit. Score honored the original, and sound generally was solid.
In sum, the army assembled by the hope of a reprise captures the prize of a wonderfully worthy movie in its own right. Doing justice to both 2019 and 2049, you watch no mere sequel. Too long? Perhaps. But better than gone.
Expand
10 of 19 users found this helpful109
All this user's reviews
9
MrDevianceOct 15, 2017
This movie is everything that I expected of it and more.
It's amazing to see how a sequel in 2017 can top what used to be the best sci-fi of all time. This movie is actually better than the first Blade Runner movie.
7 of 9 users found this helpful72
All this user's reviews
9
pixelcraftablesOct 7, 2017
A fantastic visual spectacle in which the scenes speak stronger than the dialogue, forcing you to think and reflect on the themes touched. The story's focus is indirectly Deckard (Harrison Ford), and the mystery and intrigue of the desolate,A fantastic visual spectacle in which the scenes speak stronger than the dialogue, forcing you to think and reflect on the themes touched. The story's focus is indirectly Deckard (Harrison Ford), and the mystery and intrigue of the desolate, emotionless, replicant society where K (Ryan Gosling) operates keeps pushing the story forward towards its climax. Excellent performances by all actors, with Harrison Ford and especially Ana de Armis being the highlights, however I felt that Jared Leto's character Wallace was written to stylistically different from the other characters, and felt out of place compared to everyone else. Expand
10 of 19 users found this helpful109
All this user's reviews
9
TryASummersaultOct 6, 2017
8.6/10 Not a Sci/Fi masterpiece overall but definitely an astoundingly incredible spectacle to behold with some of the greatest imagery of all time. Villeneuve has solidified himself as probably the most visually brilliant director around8.6/10 Not a Sci/Fi masterpiece overall but definitely an astoundingly incredible spectacle to behold with some of the greatest imagery of all time. Villeneuve has solidified himself as probably the most visually brilliant director around right now with grand scapes of vast meticulous detail. As far as the story goes however there are some unnecessarily lengthy scenes/dialogues/plotting that aim to be far bigger than what they end up being and come off as somewhat pretentious at times. The plotting was exceptionally clever yet just suffered from pacing issues and odd twists that are perplexing yet frustrating. Gosling was fantastic as always, but Jared Leto was once again under utilized and his intriguingly fascinating character was barely extrapolated upon. Zimmer yet again crafted a perfect soundtrack and is an utter master of sonic brilliance. Expand
11 of 22 users found this helpful1111
All this user's reviews
9
SupR_GOct 6, 2017
This is a stunning visual masterpiece. An absolute feast for the senses. A true spiritual successor to the original, with an excellent story and script to follow the first pioneer film. I knew going in, it would be a long and slow paced film,This is a stunning visual masterpiece. An absolute feast for the senses. A true spiritual successor to the original, with an excellent story and script to follow the first pioneer film. I knew going in, it would be a long and slow paced film, and so instead of holding my breath for the climax, I admired and soaked in the amazing world Villeneuve built. Any fan of the original will adore this film. Expand
11 of 21 users found this helpful1110
All this user's reviews
9
ejbeebyApr 4, 2021
I'm going to voice an unpopular opinion: This movie is better than the original.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MerrOct 6, 2017
Beautiful, suprising, sad, tragic and timely made. Not as good as first one, but a worthy sequel. First Blade Runner was asking a questions revelant for times it was made. Blade Runner 2049 asks question revelant for times we all live in andBeautiful, suprising, sad, tragic and timely made. Not as good as first one, but a worthy sequel. First Blade Runner was asking a questions revelant for times it was made. Blade Runner 2049 asks question revelant for times we all live in and the times soon to come. Expand
11 of 21 users found this helpful1110
All this user's reviews
9
PeabarterOct 8, 2017
I cautiously got excited to see this movie. Of course, I watched the Final cut version of Blade Runner with my son 2 days before. My anticipation increased when I saw overwhelming critic ratings, but I only read one review ahead of time. II cautiously got excited to see this movie. Of course, I watched the Final cut version of Blade Runner with my son 2 days before. My anticipation increased when I saw overwhelming critic ratings, but I only read one review ahead of time. I was worried that too high expectations would result in my being disappointed with the film. I did note that the film was 2 hrs and 40 minutes long so I prepared myself for a long movie. The obvious place to see this film was the IMAX at the MN zoo which has a true 70 mm screen (97 ft high!!!) and the most awesome sound presentation that I have ever heard.

I'm happy to say that I was not let down by my high expectations. I loved the story, visuals and sound track of Blade Runner 2049! The movie plays like a mystery/detective story and keeps the audience immersed and thinking about what they are watching. This movie may not be for everyone since there are many scenes with no talking as it follows the protagonist, detective K (played well by Ryan Gosling), while he works the clues and moves around the futuristic world. Just sit back and enjoy the visuals and music score during these scenes. It is so nice to see a movie that is built around an intricate story with character development and not just how many chase scenes they can string together. Hollywood are you listening??? Blade Runner 2049 does a great job stitching the special effects into the movie to complement the story rather than vice versa. Be sure to watch the original Blade Runner before going to see this movie. The stories are linked and you will be doing yourself a disservice otherwise.
Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
9
Gamed2longNov 5, 2017
Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful unicorn of a film. The kind of film that only comes along once every few years. And it'll probably be talked about for years. Its very much art house film but with a modern blockbusters budget and resources.Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful unicorn of a film. The kind of film that only comes along once every few years. And it'll probably be talked about for years. Its very much art house film but with a modern blockbusters budget and resources. The film plays with complex concepts that can quickly turn into debates. People have complained that the film is long and drags on. And if your looking for action events and plot twists that will be your experience. The film is like a 10 layer puzzle. The problem, like the original, is that the simplest layer on the bottom is strange and doesn't have much going on. Since that is usually all there is to simpler action flicks, if you don't look on other levels for more then you get bored. But on every other layer of the puzzle the pieces add up. The rules of the universe are self consistent and not broken. The narrative makes certain logic jumps without spoon-feeding you the information. Again, off-putting to people used to being spoon-fed every plot point. My experience for the first viewing of the film was with a language I am not yet fluent in. So a lot of the conversation was lost on me. I was amazed by the visual storytelling that was going on. My second viewing, in my native language, only added to it, though it helped I could focus on other details the second time around. More than 1 viewing suggested! Overall it is an incredibly impressive film, toying with the fundamental concept of what it means to be human. And what it means to be human in a world where memory can be implanted, where creations are becoming more perfect than their creators and what it means when you can't tell the difference anymore. In a way the film borrows ideas from other P.K.Dicks novels and takes them great places. True to the universe of the original film it also cut key elements of the book out. Overall best film I've seen in ages. Also props to the director. The romantic encounter scene is something absolutely unique. Given how often that contents been put to film, truly a feat! Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
9
LauberfenOct 8, 2017
Matches the tone, style and philosophical reflections of the original, while clearly advancing the plot, rather than attempting a re-boot. Moves into a more clearly dystopia setting, which is a plus in my book. Sound track has clearMatches the tone, style and philosophical reflections of the original, while clearly advancing the plot, rather than attempting a re-boot. Moves into a more clearly dystopia setting, which is a plus in my book. Sound track has clear similarities to Arrival, but ends up a little aggressive; both uncomfortably loud at points and some too quiet dialogue. Demands a second viewing. Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
9
lenny68Oct 6, 2017
There's certainly more style than substance on show in the new sequel, but the story is still engaging. At no point during the nearly three hours running time did I feel bored or frustrated with how the plot was moving along. There willThere's certainly more style than substance on show in the new sequel, but the story is still engaging. At no point during the nearly three hours running time did I feel bored or frustrated with how the plot was moving along. There will obviously be negative comparisons with the original, but this film should taken on it's own merit, and great merit it has. Expand
31 of 47 users found this helpful3116
All this user's reviews
9
MaxsonOct 8, 2017
The movie might be a bit too long for some people, and there's definitely a lot to take in while watching this movie. Blade Runner 2049 is a great sequel, and very faithful to the original. The movie is absolutely gorgeous, every scene isThe movie might be a bit too long for some people, and there's definitely a lot to take in while watching this movie. Blade Runner 2049 is a great sequel, and very faithful to the original. The movie is absolutely gorgeous, every scene is like a piece of art. Surprisingly, I was never bored with the movie thanks to the captivating dialogues and great acting from the cast. Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
9
Notarius2323Oct 7, 2017
p«Бегущий по лезвию 2049 »: Снятся ли андроидам достойные сиквелы? В 1982 году, с жанром научной фантастики произошел феномен имя которому Бегущий по лезвию, за авторством сэра Ридли Скотта. Центральной темой фильма были взаимоотношения междуp«Бегущий по лезвию 2049 »: Снятся ли андроидам достойные сиквелы? В 1982 году, с жанром научной фантастики произошел феномен имя которому Бегущий по лезвию, за авторством сэра Ридли Скотта. Центральной темой фильма были взаимоотношения между репликантами (искусственной формой жизни) и людьми, а так же затрагивалась тема: жизни и смерти. Критики смешано отреагировали на картину и их мнения разделились: кто-то ругал фильм за излишнюю монотонность, а кто-то хвалил визуальную составляющую. В прокате у кинокартины Скотта дела тоже не заладились, где ее ждал провал. И все же, это не помешало «Бегущему по лезвию» выдержать испытание временем и приобрести статус культовой кинокартины. Прошло 30 лет, на большие экраны выходит сиквел, «Бегущий по лезвию 2049» в режиссерском кресле Дени Вильнев, Ридли Скотт значится продюсером, а за сценарий отвечает автор оригинала Хэмптон Финчер. Что же получилось у канадского кинорежиссера? Вильнев не скрывал, что многие элементы в сценарии он переработал под свое видение, при этом развивая основную идею оригинала. Фильм затрагивает тему человечности и поднимает ряд вопросов: что делает человека, человеком? Наличие души? Мораль или может быть эмоции? Вопросы, проходят сквозь сюжет поделенный на 3 акта – ближе к финалу, которого, ожидает Рик Декард 30 лет хранивший тайну способную перевернуть мир. В «Бегущем по Лезвию 2049» окончательно размыта грань между человеком и новыми моделями репликантов, оно и неудивительно ведь главный девиз Tyrell Corporation: "больше человек, чем сам человек". Как и в оригинале у картины неспешный темп повествования и большой акцент на деталях, а хронометраж составляет неполные 3 часа. Вообще любая попытка углубления в тему сюжета - спойлер, поэтому детали стоит опустить. Одна из сильнейших сторон фильма – визуальная составляющая, каждый кадр настоящее произведение искусства: его построение, плавность переходов, великолепная работа с цветовой гаммой и неважно будь то урбанистические джунгли дождливого Лос-Анджелеса, усыпанные тысячами неоновых вывесок и голограмм или апокалиптические руины старого города. Роджер Дикинс – настоящий маэстро, в его послужном списке такие работы, как «Побег и Шоушенка», «Старикам тут не место» и 7 номинаций на премию Оскар. «Бегущий по лезвию 2049», образцовый сиквел и значимое событие для современной кинофантастики, в то время пока некоторые студии продолжают штамповать ремейки или продолжения на грани ремейка, Дени Вильнев, снимает свое авторское видение «Бегущего по Лезвию» развивая идеи оригинала, а не эксплуатирует старые. Итог: к просмотру обязательно Expand
10 of 19 users found this helpful109
All this user's reviews
9
LynnuxOct 9, 2017
Well done, Mr. Villeneuve. Finally a good example for Jar Jar Abrams and Disney how to make a sequel.
The sound was a bit too obtrusive and oversteered in the cinema I watched this.
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
9
ElucidateDec 1, 2019
If you don't think that highly of this movie, I can relate, because I didn't either after the first time I watched it. But it's amazing how everything can change with a second viewing. The plot and characterization are handled with incredibleIf you don't think that highly of this movie, I can relate, because I didn't either after the first time I watched it. But it's amazing how everything can change with a second viewing. The plot and characterization are handled with incredible subtlety and finesse. There is just so much to unpack in each scene. Add all this to the stunning visuals and the result is a work of art that is as emotional as it is profound. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
eagleeyevikingOct 7, 2017
While it doesn't raise thought-provoking questions as effectively as the original, "Blade Runner 2049" earns its position as a worthy sequel thanks to a captivating mystery, action that feels earned, intelligent themes & world building, andWhile it doesn't raise thought-provoking questions as effectively as the original, "Blade Runner 2049" earns its position as a worthy sequel thanks to a captivating mystery, action that feels earned, intelligent themes & world building, and lush cinematography which synthesises perfectly with an unearthly soundtrack. Never felt bored throughout the runtime and could have watched it for longer. Expand
19 of 31 users found this helpful1912
All this user's reviews
9
IttiacesOct 11, 2017
As a sequel to the original 1982 film, this latest chapter from the blade runner universe holds its own. We find our protagonist, played by Ryan Gosling, working with the police to hunt down replicants, cyborgs indistinguishable from humans.As a sequel to the original 1982 film, this latest chapter from the blade runner universe holds its own. We find our protagonist, played by Ryan Gosling, working with the police to hunt down replicants, cyborgs indistinguishable from humans. A special mission sets him on a particularly dangerous path of self-discovery. Gosling is superb here. I initially criticised him as a choice for this role, but I was hands down wrong. He portrays the character with an innocence and sense of vulnerability that is very touching and heartfelt. Harrison Ford is excellent but doesn't have as much screen time as I'm sure fans were expecting. The story is well paced for the most part and manages to keep the audience engaged. I saw this in a huge theatre that was packed to the brim and you could've heard a pin drop throughout the entire screening. The visuals are stunning and progressive without being separated too far from the first outing. It's creatively graded to emphasise certain atmospheres and moods which I found interesting. The attention to detail in the sets is impressive although most of it is CGI. The cinematography is also very impressive, and overall it's a beautifully conceived film. On the downside, at nearly 3 hours it's incredibly long, and you do start to feel that towards the last 30 minutes or so. Disappointingly, I also found some of the themes to be quite derogatory to women. Lots of brothels, hookers, nakedness, digital women created as companions. There was no gender balance in this somewhat sordid area. Although we did have a female villain, and head of police so at least some attempt at strong female characters admittedly. Overall, it's one of the best films of the year and will probably make the list as one of the finest sequels ever made. Highly recommended. Expand
10 of 14 users found this helpful104
All this user's reviews
9
ahnehnoisOct 10, 2017
The tone of the original has been recreated and advanced in a convincing and worthwhile way, for better or for worse. Where the original inspired many sci-fi pieces over the last twenty or thirty years, the sequel clearly borrows from theThe tone of the original has been recreated and advanced in a convincing and worthwhile way, for better or for worse. Where the original inspired many sci-fi pieces over the last twenty or thirty years, the sequel clearly borrows from the genre, with one of its several twists being borrowed from the very Blade-Runner-ish Battlestar Galactica.

As many references to the original as there are, some work better than others. I can live with an Edward James Olmos cameo, but Sean Young was really awkwardly shoehorned in. The funny references to long lost companies permeate the background and that's cool, but what's less cool is the ubiquitous Hans Zimmer aping the electronic soundscape of the original but completely missing the meditative quality of Vangelis' original.

On its own merits though, the new Blade Runner is more of a thinker's movie than most, and offers several intriguing twists, memorable characters, and iconic imagery. It's worth seeing, and going in without spoilers, and giving a think as to how far away we are from its world right now.
Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
9
allisonjane65Oct 7, 2017
I think negative comparisons with the original Blade Runner are unfair and unwarranted because BR2049 is an excellent stand alone movie. A knowledge of the original isn't really necessary {although an understanding of Deckard and Rachel'sI think negative comparisons with the original Blade Runner are unfair and unwarranted because BR2049 is an excellent stand alone movie. A knowledge of the original isn't really necessary {although an understanding of Deckard and Rachel's relationship would help}. Go and see it on the biggest screen you can and prepare to be wowed! Expand
14 of 26 users found this helpful1412
All this user's reviews
9
antmolly1995Oct 8, 2017
Blade Runner 2049 is a beautifully crafted film and as good as any fan of the original could realistically expect it to be. I was nervous about what Villeneuve would come up with as I was not a fan of Arrival which I thought was far tooBlade Runner 2049 is a beautifully crafted film and as good as any fan of the original could realistically expect it to be. I was nervous about what Villeneuve would come up with as I was not a fan of Arrival which I thought was far too ponderous. Fortunately he's delivered the goods and then some! Expand
25 of 35 users found this helpful2510
All this user's reviews
9
lennycliff123Oct 7, 2017
I generally hate the word 'awesome' but it's a fitting description of Blade Runner 2049. Watching it {on the biggest screen I could find} took me back to the days when going to the cinema was an 'event'. The film, while not without its flawsI generally hate the word 'awesome' but it's a fitting description of Blade Runner 2049. Watching it {on the biggest screen I could find} took me back to the days when going to the cinema was an 'event'. The film, while not without its flaws is a mesmerizing experience as a whole. Highly recommended. Expand
10 of 21 users found this helpful1011
All this user's reviews
9
ukrScorpionApr 17, 2018
This film is like a good wine....
slows and small sips
warms and leaves a pleasant aftertaste...
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
chesaroNov 19, 2017
A good movie, and good sequel, i watched the first one (for the first time) the day before, and i think it is the best movie i've watched this year so far.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
Kai82Jan 30, 2020
This is an interesting case. When I got out of the cinema I would have given 10/10. Then I started thinking about the movie and it got worse. Lets start with the movie: It starts 30 years after the prequel and follows the story of Officer KThis is an interesting case. When I got out of the cinema I would have given 10/10. Then I started thinking about the movie and it got worse. Lets start with the movie: It starts 30 years after the prequel and follows the story of Officer K (Ryan Gosling) as he hunts Replicants and makes an astonishing discovery that could shaken the world. I wont spoil the story but say they got the most out of it. Then there is the setting: They nailed it. A world where nature has died and such a miserable and hopeless place. It is an outlook to a wretched future where mankind has failed. Then there are the Replicants. I will say they created a slave race that mankind mistreated. Then I saw how they treated other humans (orphans) and will say it is not much different. For the actors: This is an amazing cast and I will praise the actors for the brilliant performance. It is like they don't act instead they became the characters. Ryan Gossling is perfect for this role. You can see his emotions and struggles. Then there is Joi played by Ana de Anmas. Her acting is equal if not a bit better than Ryan Gosslings. The performances from Jared Leto (Niander Wallace) and Sylvia Hoels (Luv) are also praiseworthy. While they have not as much screen time they nail their characters. At last there is Harrison Ford. They did him justice and use his character well (I am pointing at “The Force Awakens”). You can not rate this movie without talking about philosophies. This movie has a lot to make you think. What is the meaning of being a human? At what point is a Replicant or AI indistinguishable from a human? Are humans only biological computers? Am I the sum of my memories? What is a life worth? Should a creator have this much power over his creations? Ethics? There is a lot worth discussing with friends. Thoughts about the movie: As I thought about the movie I had following realisations: 1. The things that happen before (After Blade Runner) and after this movie (If I am reading the implications correctly) are far more interesting than this movie or lets say have more potential.2.What was archived in this movie? There is a lot of character development but what has changed in the grand picture? 3. Why did they chose this fate for Rachael and Rick? Even in a broken and hopeless world they should deserve at least a bit of a happy ending. 4. How did no one find Rick in all this years? His hiding place is good but nothing a cop, officer or bounty hunter will miss in the long run. Overall it was one of the best movies of the year and worth watching. It is sad that it made not enough money at the box office to get a sequel. Dont let my thoughts louse your enjoyment. I still give 8,5/10. Bonus knowledge: Did you know that Blade Runner and the Alien franchise share the same universe? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
evokingsMay 31, 2018
I watched the original 80s blade runner film, and then this back to back, I like both movies, but I'd give the edge to BR 2049, thats not to say that the first BR is a horrible movie or anything, it was a visionary movie for it's time and hadI watched the original 80s blade runner film, and then this back to back, I like both movies, but I'd give the edge to BR 2049, thats not to say that the first BR is a horrible movie or anything, it was a visionary movie for it's time and had a great ending, and it's vary rare to see modern sequel get as many of the elements as right as it does and expand upon it without totally wrecking the original, I did have some criticism about what happens, but I enjoyed how they tried to keep the same flavor of the original movie it was not some total cash grab that we are used to seeing,for example you can tell the cars, and building architecture look vary much like what people would think is futuristic looking in the 80s. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
LukibusOct 10, 2017
Stunning, immersive, thrilling. A special mention deserves the photografy, colors, music and sound effects, which creates a wonderful sense of immersion. The story is surely more complex and rich compared to the first one (it has more twistsStunning, immersive, thrilling. A special mention deserves the photografy, colors, music and sound effects, which creates a wonderful sense of immersion. The story is surely more complex and rich compared to the first one (it has more twists and complexity). I was amazed and captivated till the end of the movie. Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
9
ChickenphOct 6, 2017
This is an outstanding movie. Very well-directed, and the design (and attention to detail) is exceptional...I can’t believe it, but this is a worthy sequel to the original.
It’s definitely atmospheric, so don’t go in expecting the emphasis to
This is an outstanding movie. Very well-directed, and the design (and attention to detail) is exceptional...I can’t believe it, but this is a worthy sequel to the original.
It’s definitely atmospheric, so don’t go in expecting the emphasis to be on action. I don’t know how else to say it: my friends and I left the theater and agreed that we were blown away.
Instant classic. There, I said it!
Expand
10 of 21 users found this helpful1011
All this user's reviews
9
jcanfisFeb 6, 2018
Most sequels can not keep up to their high expectations. Blade Runner 2049 does.
i was satisfied with story, visuals and pacing. Not boring at all.
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
9
FurtinDec 21, 2017
Was totally blown away as I really feared a sequel to the original masterpiece and one of the best Sci-Fi movies ever made.

2049 is what SW:TLJ is not: aware of its heritage and completely absorbs its world building and pacing. Another
Was totally blown away as I really feared a sequel to the original masterpiece and one of the best Sci-Fi movies ever made.

2049 is what SW:TLJ is not: aware of its heritage and completely absorbs its world building and pacing.
Another masterpiece, just like the original that aged so very well and yet we have a modern one. Great visual and auditive experience too.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
MattBrady99Oct 9, 2017
"Pain reminds you the joy you felt was real".

Wow! WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW! And another WOW! "Blade Runner 2049" is a fantastic follow up to the first and fixes a lot of the issues people had with the 1982 film. Without any director or
"Pain reminds you the joy you felt was real".

Wow! WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW! And another WOW!

"Blade Runner 2049" is a fantastic follow up to the first and fixes a lot of the issues people had with the 1982 film. Without any director or extended cut. It's everything a sequel should do. Hell, you can watch this without watching the first and wouldn't get lost. Something "Force Awakes", "Jurassic World", and "Finding Dory" should take notes on. This is the type of film that will inspire young film makers out there to pick up a camera and make art. It's that great.

As I said in my "Arrival" review, Denis Villeneuve can release a movie every year and be close of making a masterpiece. This is the masterpiece. When "Prisoners" and "Enemy" was released, a lot of people saw great promise for him in the future, but never has a director live up to that praise. You can see the love and respect he has for the original without cheating out by playing on your nostalgic to win you over, not with Blade Runner. He also brings something new to the universe and made the whole thing thought-provoking.

Roger Deakins continues to out shine himself with every film his apart of, however this might be his best work yet. The beautiful imagery, framing, the use of darkest and neon lights really adds to the amazement of the world building. It's one of the most good looking films I've this year and nothing will top it. I swear if this doesn't get him that long and well deserved Oscar, then nothing will. I lost respect for the Academy a long time ago, but this will make them look spineless.

The performances from everyone were all fantastic. Ryan Gosling and Robin Wright are great as always. Harrison Ford gave probably the best performance I've seen from him. And Jared Leto redeeming himself after the garbage fire that was "Suicide Squad", despite the small screen time. I finally saw him playing a character, not a try-hard 'look at my method acting'.

The score was incredible and has this blasting roar to it that the speakers at my cinema literally vibrated every time. I didn't see it in IMAX, it's that effective.

What surprised me more is how engaging the story was and how emotional it got. By the end, I felt a tear coming down my eye. Little CGI was used in certain aspects as it went for a more practical path with it's effects. The final result is remarkable.

Overall rating: Villeneuve nailed what many thought was impossible. My eye for his next movie has gone up sky high. Please go support this.
Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
9
thebombOct 19, 2017
Blade Runner 2049 is a audio-visual masterpiece which thrives on its innovative scenery - each location is unique. It's hard not to get mesmerized by it's thrilling story which leaves as many questions open as it answers. The three hourBlade Runner 2049 is a audio-visual masterpiece which thrives on its innovative scenery - each location is unique. It's hard not to get mesmerized by it's thrilling story which leaves as many questions open as it answers. The three hour experience holds your attention up to a point where you don't want it to stop. While the acting doesn't deliver anything out of the ordinary, the attention-grabbing unlinear storytelling combined with purely beautiful cinematography makes this film a true gem. This is one to watch over and over again. Expand
6 of 8 users found this helpful62
All this user's reviews
9
QuietGiantOct 6, 2017
Creating a worthy sequel to one of the most influential films of all time is one hell of a tall order. It deserves no less than a dream team of talent and thankfully that's exactly what it got. The direction is sharp, the visuals pop, theCreating a worthy sequel to one of the most influential films of all time is one hell of a tall order. It deserves no less than a dream team of talent and thankfully that's exactly what it got. The direction is sharp, the visuals pop, the performances emanate, and the writing is true to the source without merely aping all the old notes or ruining all the mystery. Core themes of the genre it helped create like the line between illusion and reality or defining humanity and one's identity are both upheld and explored in increasingly nuanced ways. Those worried about a neo noir film devolving into an action fest can breathe too as that was oversold by the marketing. The one trademark I do miss though is Vangelis' multilayered, ever present composition. 2049 strikes a different tone and isn't afraid of quiet moments, but the absence of one of its predecessor's most defining features remains conspicuous. Still, nearly everyone involved in the project is at the top of their game and should be proud of the work they've accomplished. Time will tell exactly how well the sequel stacks up to the 'original', but in any case it comes as close one could ask for today. I can still scarcely believe it, myself. Expand
18 of 32 users found this helpful1814
All this user's reviews
9
mace8704Oct 7, 2017
A true Blade Runner sequel that shares both the strengths and the flaws of its predecessors. Beautiful cinematography, ambiguous character motivations that leave a lot open to personal interpretation, slow pacing....Yep, that's the ol' BladeA true Blade Runner sequel that shares both the strengths and the flaws of its predecessors. Beautiful cinematography, ambiguous character motivations that leave a lot open to personal interpretation, slow pacing....Yep, that's the ol' Blade Runner. I'd strongly recommend this to any fan of the original film. **IMPORTANT** The film does a poor job of catching newcomers to franchise up on important plot details. It assumes you are familiar with Deckard and Rachel. To appreciate the narrative, you must be at least mildly familiar with the original 1982 Blade Runner film. I'd recommend the Final Cut version of the film. There are also 3 short animated prequels to 2049 that will help you understand the setting more. Strengths: Amazing cinematography, Great acting from the female supporting actresses and Gosling, ambiguous plot that will leave you debating with friends. Weakness: Poorly acted and written antagonist. Narrative is NOT self contained and demands a sequel and some familiarity with previous lore, slow pace. Expand
11 of 21 users found this helpful1110
All this user's reviews
9
gq_foineOct 9, 2017
My review after watching IMAX. Having seeing the first Blade Runner and how amazing I thought the original movie was, I had extremely high expectations on the sequel. This is not a perfect movie and had some missed opportunities where theMy review after watching IMAX. Having seeing the first Blade Runner and how amazing I thought the original movie was, I had extremely high expectations on the sequel. This is not a perfect movie and had some missed opportunities where the story could have further developed and shined more to have it become a true masterpiece, but overall this was definitely a solid 8+. Let's starts with the pros:

Amazing cast of characters and actors! I really thought Ryan Gosling (Officer K) did a fantastic job! And the other two amazing characters was Officer K - AI lover- JOI (Ana De Armas) and Jared Leto (Wallace). Visuals- Were amazing and loved them the artistic theme and colors.. But I wished they used less CGI and more real and authentic sceneries. The CGI felt to sterile, clean and less grit in the real world. Music- was great! But, I felt they tried very hard to keep it up with the original Blade runner. I really loved the Jazz tones and 60's nostalgia- that was amazing!!. But I would have preferred more classical synthesized electronic tones and the credits music was horrible- heavy metal. They could have put like 80's theme style music/ song rolling through the credits. My biggest beef was the story and some of the sterile CGI stuff. While I don't want to spoil anything, I just felt they could have really done a better job building the character's relationships and development. I would have been more emotionally attached vs feeling I don't care if this person dies. Something that Nier Automata (Video Game) does a much better job making feel more attach to "replicants". Frankly, I was more attached to Officer's K AI relationship more than Deckard to his..... I think this was a great movie but maybe I need to watch it again to say it's was a masterpiece. I didn't go away saying ahhhhhhh.... Or really felt emotional connected to Officer K, or Deckard. I was more connected to the AI than these characters. But visually, music and acting was on point except the CGI crap. I would give it 8.5/10. And the original blade runner is 9.5. I hope the next Blade Runner they work on developing the Characters better and relationships so I can feel emotionally connected, less CGI, and a stronger Plot.
Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
9
Tony1984Jan 15, 2018
The original Blade Runner was my first introduction to metaphysical philosophy. It was one of most profound and beautiful movies of the 20th century and it still affects me to this day..When I saw Ryan Gosling cast in the 2049 I was veryThe original Blade Runner was my first introduction to metaphysical philosophy. It was one of most profound and beautiful movies of the 20th century and it still affects me to this day..When I saw Ryan Gosling cast in the 2049 I was very disappointed. I swore to myself never to attend a movie of his again after the disgusting abomination that is "Only God Forgives" but I relented eventually, Blade Runner is that important.. He is the weakest part of the movie for me. I just don't like his voice or face. Thats personal preference.
And what is the movie? A continuation of the transhumanist question from Blade Runner 1. Can replicants ( or even AI's who receive very positive treatment here) have souls? Can man be a God and create life? My anwswer is no and the movie answers in the affirmative, understandably. Judge for yourself.
Symbolism and esotericism saturate every scene. Every line of dialogue, prop, stance, quirk, image,prominent and obscured has an obvious meaning ...and hidden one...It feels religious in its exposition because in a way it is. Its arcane and occultist. It makes one think and want to return for closer inspection. Whatever your philosophical position there can be no denying the beauty visually and aurally of this devastated dystopia. Gosling apart, a masterpiece..
Expand
7 of 8 users found this helpful71
All this user's reviews
9
parallax_84Jan 12, 2018
A worthy successor of the original Blade Runner. The story is good, the acting is also very good (specially Sylvia Hoeks), The lighting, Framing , special effects, Ambience , Music...
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Mragusa2Oct 8, 2017
A true masterpiece, both in terms of science fiction, and the art of cinema in general. Visually, it's one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen, period. Nearly every scene looks like something out of a painting. The acting isA true masterpiece, both in terms of science fiction, and the art of cinema in general. Visually, it's one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen, period. Nearly every scene looks like something out of a painting. The acting is phenomenal, with a near perfect cast. One of my biggest criticisms with most of today's movies is that they never take the time to tell their story. Blade Runner does exactly the opposite: each & every scene is critical to the plot of the film, so when you hear someone say it's sucks because of how long it is, they probably prefer loud, boring movies like Michael Bay's crapfest. Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
9
VadertimeApr 2, 2018
I heard good reviews about this movie from the critics, but mixed feedback from general movie goers. So, I decided to wait for it to come out on DVD, like I do for many of the movies these days. This movie was surprisingly good and well-made.I heard good reviews about this movie from the critics, but mixed feedback from general movie goers. So, I decided to wait for it to come out on DVD, like I do for many of the movies these days. This movie was surprisingly good and well-made. My only two complaints are that it's about 40 minutes too long and it bogs down at times. I paused the DVD at least 6 times as I went to the kitchen for beer or snacks. I am not a big Ryan Gosling fan, but he did a good job in this moviel. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
hugoferreiraSep 13, 2018
Perfectly filmed, beautiful image and a perfectly paced, succeeding perfectly to its predecessor. Denis keeps on surprising the audience. The villain could have been better constructed though, it had more potential. Enjoy
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ThazariDec 26, 2021
This movie does everything right: Amazing visuals, audio and atmosphere, a well-crafted story with interesting characters and good dialogue, and a pleasant pacing in which the director just takes the time for exposition so the audience canThis movie does everything right: Amazing visuals, audio and atmosphere, a well-crafted story with interesting characters and good dialogue, and a pleasant pacing in which the director just takes the time for exposition so the audience can take in the scene. Some very interesting villains and deep plot, without it being convoluted or condenscating. Different from the original, but in my opinion it's done in a good way to keep the franchise fresh and modern. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
RabidBetaOct 6, 2017
The original is my favorite film, I should start with that. Is the sequel a masterpiece...no, but I'm more than happy with what I saw (in IMAX). Incredible world-building on par with the original, great casting/characters, award-winningThe original is my favorite film, I should start with that. Is the sequel a masterpiece...no, but I'm more than happy with what I saw (in IMAX). Incredible world-building on par with the original, great casting/characters, award-winning cinematography, great direction, excellent score, and a solid script. I felt it went on a bit too long, and a couple of scenes could be cut, and a few trimmed. But this long run doesn't hurt the film. I really liked it. I'll have to watch it a few dozen more times, and maybe I'll even come to love it as I do the original. Four star film, but I gave it five stars for not screwing up a franchise I thought couldn't possibly be sequel-ed well. Expand
9 of 18 users found this helpful99
All this user's reviews
9
miccaelMar 17, 2018
really like the art and sound, story is cool too!
Very well rebooted / sequel'd. Actors are nice too and colours are amazing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
The3AcademySinsOct 11, 2017
This is the amazing sequel to Blade Runner that we definitely did not deserve. It's better than any Blade Runner sequel I could have imagined. The direction is fantastic, and it might be Dennis Villeneuve's best work to date. The acting isThis is the amazing sequel to Blade Runner that we definitely did not deserve. It's better than any Blade Runner sequel I could have imagined. The direction is fantastic, and it might be Dennis Villeneuve's best work to date. The acting is beautiful, and there is not a weak link in the cast. The script is mind blowingly incredible, and very true to the original Blade Runner film.

This movie is an experience. You will be transported to this other world and blown away. Watch this movie on the biggest screen that you can, it will only add to how beautiful this movie looks. I spent the rest of the day thinking about life after I walked out of the theater. This movie will inspire you. Go see it.
Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
9
movieconsultantDec 31, 2017
A beautifully shot film. The story is carefully crafted and realistic. The cinematography and music are terrific and they work well together to deliver a truly immersive film despite its long runtime. It deals with issues similar to the firstA beautifully shot film. The story is carefully crafted and realistic. The cinematography and music are terrific and they work well together to deliver a truly immersive film despite its long runtime. It deals with issues similar to the first film and is a great addition that not only expands the blade runner universe but also keeps the sense of mystery surrounding that world. Expand
6 of 8 users found this helpful62
All this user's reviews
9
eva3si0nJan 4, 2018
The best movie cyberpunk of 2017 and in general last 5 years. Yes the sequel is much simpler than the original. In general Denis Villeneuve the excellent director, has perfectly reported the atmosphere of the original, but after all the firstThe best movie cyberpunk of 2017 and in general last 5 years. Yes the sequel is much simpler than the original. In general Denis Villeneuve the excellent director, has perfectly reported the atmosphere of the original, but after all the first hour of the movie is tightened and in general almost doesn't bear important semantic loading. Jarrett Leto has perfectly played the antagonist, will be sure continuation soon and he will be revealed completely as personnel. And the main thing, is an ending. She has a little disappointed, after all there is a wish to see the complete final, let and open, but complete. As in the first part, but not just end of a deytstviye and credits. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
MrLissOct 19, 2017
For me, the "Blade Runner, 2049" was the most anticipated film of the year. Ditched the pair for first in session and in view I can say that the expectations are justified. We have the same old Blade Runner — the philosophy in the cyberpunkFor me, the "Blade Runner, 2049" was the most anticipated film of the year. Ditched the pair for first in session and in view I can say that the expectations are justified. We have the same old Blade Runner — the philosophy in the cyberpunk world of the future, which is accompanied by gorgeous visuals, sincavage sound and neon signs. As a sequel, the tape looks incredibly well from the first minute it is visible that the project was a true fan of the original film. The atmosphere absorbs the head, the events stretch smoothly and slowly, which is a characteristic feature of the series and for many it is a minus (but not me). Despite the close relationship with the original, tape Villeneuve is sure to surprise and show something new. Almost completely disappeared aesthetics of film Noir, and instead proposed increased portion of action and a greater variety of locations, introduces viewers to the world of the future outside of big cities. Speaking about the actors and their characters I would like to highlight Dave Batista, which was very little, but in such a short amount of screen time he managed to create a memorable and interesting way, the background which can be seen in the short prequel to "2048: Nowhere to run", filmed by Luke Scott. Also for a small fraction of the duration in time perfectly to reveal the characters of Jared Leto and Harrison Ford. The latter even in the joint scenes with the main character managed to pull the viewer's attention on himself his endless charisma. The Key Officer in the performance of Ryan Gosling is ambiguous. In General, the role of the canadian classic — Ryan plays silent maloemotsionalny young people with a sad look, and in this film it is also due to the peculiarities of the character.

There were, of course, and without the drawbacks. For me, the obvious shortcomings of steel sagging narrative at the end of the first hour timekeeping, small, slow, even compared to the original tape, not until the end of the open arches of the characters (mostly Wallace), as well as the soundtrack. He, of course, good, Hans Zimmer as always on top, but still a new "Running" lacks the charm that gave the tracks by Vangelis, composer of the first part. But none of these minuses can not name at least serious, why the impressions of the paintings remain very positive. Done a great job with the material, the technical side of the film is just beyond praise and deserves at least Oscar nominations for the soundtrack, visual effects and cinematography. A worthy continuation of the classic, which once again proved to everyone that Denis Villeneuve is one of the best directors of our day.
Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
9
Passingby777Oct 12, 2017
First of all what i loved the most is the atmosphere and the story telling. I had watched the first one before and was impressed by how little dialogue was needed to move the plot along and to convey the message. Most recent movies left meFirst of all what i loved the most is the atmosphere and the story telling. I had watched the first one before and was impressed by how little dialogue was needed to move the plot along and to convey the message. Most recent movies left me with a sower aftertaste and with the impression that it was numbed down by having a huge amount of dialogue and explanations. The original used the atmosphere, the sounds and the characters to tell it's story and the difference from the modern approach was really obvious. The feeling i had while watching the original i found again while seeing 2049.
It is a sequel but without making you feel that not watching the original was a big mistake. This was the one movie in a very long time that did not disappoint me. I have loved it. It is something else and i could go on and on about the plot twist that was introduces incredibly well but at the same time was not in your face and then what happened afterwards when you felt that you passed the traditional twist... Anyway, if you love SciFi movies and have felt violated by the abortions that came out in the last years (at most 3 were good) or the traditional Hollywood recipes i cannot recommend this one enough.
Expand
7 of 9 users found this helpful72
All this user's reviews
9
akenaton1984Nov 4, 2017
Gran obra que retoma la película de 1981 desde un ángulo distinto. Lleno de híper-textualidades y un uso maravillosos de las tomas panorámicas en una civilización colapsada. Ejercicio de reflexión sobre la importancia de la memoria.
7 of 10 users found this helpful73
All this user's reviews
9
SaydaNeenDec 18, 2017
Very good, movie. Keeps you entertained and engaged in the story throughout its long playtime. The lore, the environment and the risks it takes with the subplots is well written.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
Mariel33Feb 26, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The themes of Blade Runner 2049


1) Reality has no right to smear its source for being identical to it

2) History can be supported by the parts that make up the history

3) It isn't possible to experience bias

4) Symmetry can freely observe itself without hurting itself

5) Reality can help God find the inability to plan the creation of reality

6) The past can manipulate the present before the past has happened

7) Any experience is a machine

8) A discovery can create the censorship that precedes its existence

9) The same movement can always reach its destination without the ability to see 10) The origin of life can be fooled into thinking it's its creation

11) The force of observation and the self are separate realities

12) Unification can't have an origin if it's to function

13) It isn't possible to see any image

14) The experience of sharing is the experience of observation

15) Analysis is a living force, which uses technology

16) Experience is created by the clash of symmetry
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DubeauOct 9, 2017
BR 2049 continues the story of the replicants and blade runner. It does so by branching new intrigues into the original script and adding dept. The presentation of the future is still a great warning for all of us. The movie has amazing FXBR 2049 continues the story of the replicants and blade runner. It does so by branching new intrigues into the original script and adding dept. The presentation of the future is still a great warning for all of us. The movie has amazing FX and has some actions. But the main effect of this movie is still the atmosphere and partially Vangelis alike music. I say alike, because it's a pale imitation of Vangelis style and the music is sadly not always that great, and become too many times a collection of sound effects. The actors are excellent, even the side characters are interesting. Don't go to that movie if you want an action flick or you are tired. The movie required your attention, even if it's mostly a visual film, the plot can be elaborate enough. Villeneuve did a fascinating movie that will go into the rank of classic, with the original one...no less. The music is maybe the aspect where it seems too loud and lacking variety. I give it a 90%, go see it if you love scifi. Update: At second viewing, I found that it lacked some action in the middle of the movie. The problem is that maybe, for a Blade Runner, he didn't do much of it in the movie (except at the beginning). Also many scenes linger too much, and it slow down the pace when they come in succession. But if you approach this as a detective movie, it kind of fits better. Still think it's a good movie. Expand
8 of 15 users found this helpful87
All this user's reviews
9
jacoobi456Oct 6, 2017
Blade Runner 2049 is a sequel to the amazing 1982 film, this time directed by Denis Villeneuve. This film was aesthetically outstanding in every way. The costumes were incredible, the sets and set design made you connect so much more with theBlade Runner 2049 is a sequel to the amazing 1982 film, this time directed by Denis Villeneuve. This film was aesthetically outstanding in every way. The costumes were incredible, the sets and set design made you connect so much more with the characters because they felt so real, especially in downtown LA. You could tell a lot of effort went into the different sets, as each one is son unique, from K's (Ryan Gosling's) bedroom to the offices in the LAPD tower to the farm etc. Speaking of Ryan Gosling, he's done another great job in this role. Not once did I doubt he was a Blade Runner, and he effortlessly explorers his characters' subplot (one which I will not elaborate on for obvious reasons), and he just radiated bad-assery. There were a lot of takes with little to no sound/script, and all we had to look at were the amazing sets and emoting of the actors, which was pretty much always impeccable. All the actors and actresses involved did great performances - Harrison Ford slipped back into his role as Rick Deckard just like he was back in the 80's, and the villain(s) were menacing and equally as compelling as Gosling & Ford. (If it's not obvious already, the cameos of people in the 1982 version were very, very much appreciated!)

Probably my favourite aspect was the multitude of different angles and shots that Villeneuve used, as it constantly gave so many different perspectives of the sets and the characters and told the story in a very technical yet beautiful way, which leads me to congratulate the editors on a very good job well done. Not only did they tell the story well, they seamlessly linked flashbacks with the present plot, and often films can suffer from poor/excessive flashbacks, and I am happy to say: this one doesn't. As for issues, the pacing suffered on a few occasions, and to be perfectly honest I felt the film went on a little too long. There were some long takes (only some, as some were extremely effective) that dragged on a bit, and made me almost wish that it would cut to a different character/scene. Also,even though the sound was outstanding in this film and so sheerly loud, I sometimes felt the music was a little out of place in some scenes. This is probably one of my personal nit-picks, but in a couple of occasions I was like 'why is there music playing right now?' However, when there needed to be music there was, so there weren't scenes where I was asking for it to be added, just a couple where I think it should've been removed, (again, probably a personal thing.) The action scenes were great and well-choreographed, but to be honest I was expecting a few more that there actually was. Conclusion: if you liked the first one, definitely see this one (but I think you'll prefer the first one, I know I did), and even if you haven't seen the first one you should check it out, as it is visually stunning.
Expand
10 of 19 users found this helpful109
All this user's reviews
9
getsmeliftedJul 23, 2023
Due to how poorly this was received on release I didn't watch it but I'm glad I finally did. I have no idea why people hated it so much. It's great. My only issue is that it could have been streamlined a little but the cinematography is soDue to how poorly this was received on release I didn't watch it but I'm glad I finally did. I have no idea why people hated it so much. It's great. My only issue is that it could have been streamlined a little but the cinematography is so good that the runtime didn't bother me at all. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ConorMacleodDec 18, 2017
Blade Runner 2049 is one of the greatest science fiction noir films of this decade. It's rich with VFX and a narrative that builds upon the world and characters of the previous film. The slow burn of the runtime pulls off a third act that isBlade Runner 2049 is one of the greatest science fiction noir films of this decade. It's rich with VFX and a narrative that builds upon the world and characters of the previous film. The slow burn of the runtime pulls off a third act that is just **** awesome, and the filmmakers should be commended for their work. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
EricgriffinloveMar 18, 2018
Stunning cinematography, set design; and breathless visuals- Blade Runner 2049 is a slow burn of rich visual, and symbolic story telling that gives you chills with its end result. Stellar characters, and a gorgeously developed, and thrillingStunning cinematography, set design; and breathless visuals- Blade Runner 2049 is a slow burn of rich visual, and symbolic story telling that gives you chills with its end result. Stellar characters, and a gorgeously developed, and thrilling world. A stellar score, with excellent directing, Blade Runner 2049 is a true testament of the Scifi genre. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
maugzzOct 15, 2017
This is the first movie that truly fills up my senses in almost every way; it kept me nervous and anxious in my seat, wishing that it would not end, even if it is +2 hours long. The environment they create is perfect and even better than theThis is the first movie that truly fills up my senses in almost every way; it kept me nervous and anxious in my seat, wishing that it would not end, even if it is +2 hours long. The environment they create is perfect and even better than the one in the first one, with a better arraignment of colors and perfect acting from the cast, making me believe every action and phrase they said. The story is very good, much better than the first one, but leaving me wishing for more of this world, something that I would not have said from watching the first one. Expand
8 of 11 users found this helpful83
All this user's reviews
9
ilyakorenevskyiOct 16, 2017
Film was great (in my point of view). Long but realy great. Fantastic atmosphere,beautiful audio, good actors job and nise plot. But you realy need to watch first Blade Runner to understand everyting. On the other side film is specific andFilm was great (in my point of view). Long but realy great. Fantastic atmosphere,beautiful audio, good actors job and nise plot. But you realy need to watch first Blade Runner to understand everyting. On the other side film is specific and long.
(Sorry for my grammar, i am not a native speaker)
Expand
7 of 10 users found this helpful73
All this user's reviews
9
PericowskyOct 12, 2017
There is nothing that Denis Villeneuve has done wrong lately, after his hits with Sicario and Arrival, comes the sequel to one of the most beloved cult films in all of film history. Visually it is majestic, the visual effects, theThere is nothing that Denis Villeneuve has done wrong lately, after his hits with Sicario and Arrival, comes the sequel to one of the most beloved cult films in all of film history. Visually it is majestic, the visual effects, the photography, the design of production and even the costumes are great executions. Ryan Gosling embodies well in bad roles like Drive, and in this is no exception, he stays to perfection. Maybe not be better than the first movie, but handles other issues, so that good work of the screenwriter. Expand
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
9
HannahKOct 6, 2017
I went in with low expectations and a feeling that I was going to come out disappointed. I'm thrilled to say that while not perfect, Blade Runner 2049 is in my opinion the best film of the year {so far} and unlikely to be topped. Worth theI went in with low expectations and a feeling that I was going to come out disappointed. I'm thrilled to say that while not perfect, Blade Runner 2049 is in my opinion the best film of the year {so far} and unlikely to be topped. Worth the wait? You bet! Expand
23 of 36 users found this helpful2313
All this user's reviews
9
JLuis_001Oct 11, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Blade Runner is one of my favorite movies of all time, let's start out there, not only it's a great movie; it's also one of the fundamental pieces of science fiction in cinema. Ridley Scott's vision, the images, the music, another legendary role for Harrison Ford, the cult to the film, everything that encloses the name Blade Runner implies too many things.

Now let's take into account a director like Denis Villeneuve who in recent years has been cementing an exceptional career, his last five films have been among the best of cinema in their respective years of release.

Now bring those things together in a sequel, a sequel to a movie that many fans consider untouchable, a sequel that comes thirty five years after the original. To say that the expectations were gigantic is to stay too short, not only for everything that represents the original film but for the reputation of its director, but I also realized that it was completely unfair to judge the film for that.

But what was of Blade Runner 2049? Honestly? I honestly am very happy about the movie I watched, 2049 is a movie that did not damage the legacy of the original but rather enhances it, a sequel worthy of the name and in my opinion one of the most beautiful films visually speaking in the last decade.

I will not reveal anything independently of all those who have already seen it but what I can say that despite the simplicity of the plot in general, this is a coherent and functional story, everything is in place and pretty much works really good. Ryan Gosling as K manages to create an interesting, complicated, deep enough character completely different from what Harrison Ford did. Obviously the difference lies in that K is a replicant, therefore his path is different. The plot follows a simple but profound argumentative line; after all, the repercussions of the events that develop after the discovery of K are enormous and somehow establish what could give rise to another or other films, although it's something I doubt enormously.

The themes of 2049 deal with identity, the soul, love, artificiality, evolution, faith, hope and yes in the end talks about revolution, the lesson that is learned and the film belongs to Gosling's character, there should be no doubt about that. Harrison Ford makes his appearance like Deckard but he is not the focus of this movie, although its character has a substantial weight in the plot.

Now let's talk about the technical marvel that is 2049, let's start with the visual, **** me, Roger Deakins created something awesome, the shots in their entirety are intoxicating, Blade Runner 2049 is a visual orgasm, I don't have the slightest doubt, I haven't seen another film this year that looks like this one, I must emphasize it, it is ridiculous the visual level of this film and also the sets play a very important role and these are also first class, especially those of the offices of Wallace Corporation and in Las Vegas, that scene in which Ryan Gosling is walking through the sand with that brutal orange palette is beautiful, to hang it in a museum, what else can I say? is just spectacular.

Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch's score, while it does not live up to what Vangelis did is actually pretty good, coupled with the outstanding sound design and sound effects, the film sounds awesome, I had never felt a movie theater vibrate that way.

Now I must speak of the bad things, which is not much but undoubtedly they do have effects in the film, the main one has to do with the way in which certain elements of the plot are carried and the rhythm of the narrative, that has nothing to do with the film's length because even though it lasts almost three hours, the film does not feel overlong at all, it's just that there are slow passages that stop the film a lot and they affect the general fluidity of the narrative.
Another problem has to do with the loose ends, the most surprising one has to do with Wallace - Leto's character - because we do not know what the **** happens with him and it's clear that his character has more at stake than what was seen and the way he disappears from the film is rude and unbelievably unsatisfactory. Those are the only reasons why I don't give it a ten but after that threshold, the movie is excellent.

Blade Runner 2049 is one of the best sequels in history, as I said it earlier is totally worthy to carry the title and also has the total right to erect itself as a complete and solid work of its own. Another home run for Villeneuve I'm more than ready and excited to see what he will do with Dune.

You may not like it; I honestly think it's not for all audiences, especially those who consume mostly or totally commercial films, nothing bad in it but at least if you are going to judge the film, judge it for what it is, no for what you expected.
Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
9
GrendizerOct 3, 2021
Clearly a movie not for the mainstream audience. It's long and not action packed as the usual Hollywood movies. It takes its time to tell a story, focus on the character and expand the universe, scene by scene. Cinematography is great, theClearly a movie not for the mainstream audience. It's long and not action packed as the usual Hollywood movies. It takes its time to tell a story, focus on the character and expand the universe, scene by scene. Cinematography is great, the music of Vangelis fits as in the 80s movie.

My only gripe is, that we knew from the trailers that Harrison Ford will be in it. Could have been a nice reveal. Denis Villeneuve is clearly, after seeing Dune, one of the best film makers to date. Too bad, we live in a world where this kind of movies doesn't attract the masses and does good money for the studios. Films like this is why I go to the cinema.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
SergioAllIndieOct 6, 2017
The sense of sobriety within the cinematographic language, as used on the 1982 film, remains there and is in my opinion enhanced. It couldn´t fell on better hands than Villeneuve´s, who with his usual shocking and raw depictions of violenceThe sense of sobriety within the cinematographic language, as used on the 1982 film, remains there and is in my opinion enhanced. It couldn´t fell on better hands than Villeneuve´s, who with his usual shocking and raw depictions of violence (not only physical, but emotional and dark-side-of-the-soul violence), make this film a truly complementary piece for the original Blade Runner; far from an excuse of just doing one. Deakins is the only master of his craft, sound design, original score and production design are exquisite too. Gosling´s performance is heartfelt and complex. Two thumps up for this one! Expand
9 of 18 users found this helpful99
All this user's reviews
9
CurlleeOct 9, 2017
The 1982 film did not impress me, not even the final cut version. It was simply too boring. So I was not excited about 2049. But I found myself glued to nearly every frame. While the cinematography is the main attraction, most of theThe 1982 film did not impress me, not even the final cut version. It was simply too boring. So I was not excited about 2049. But I found myself glued to nearly every frame. While the cinematography is the main attraction, most of the characters, story, and score were interesting. Great direction and acting. The only things that I was not overly fond of were Leto's character and the last segment of the movie (except the last scene), where it felt out of place compared to the rest of the film. But one of the year's best for me. Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
9
MichaelObeOct 6, 2017
Thirty years after the events of the original film, a new line of replicants was created, more humble and subordinate. The corporation is headed by Mr. Wallace (Jared Leto). Officer LAPD K (Ryan Gosling) learns top-secret information thatThirty years after the events of the original film, a new line of replicants was created, more humble and subordinate. The corporation is headed by Mr. Wallace (Jared Leto). Officer LAPD K (Ryan Gosling) learns top-secret information that threatens the existence of the whole world. Trying to find answers to his questions, Kay begins looking for the former "blade runner" Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), who disappeared without a trace 30 years ago. The extraordinary work of Roger Dickins deserves all sorts of praises and awards (Oscar winner finally?), and Denis Villeneuve continued the film of Sir Ridley Scott with dignity. This is a Denis's own film, which hardly fit into the standard understanding of the sequel. But a very long timing (~2 hours 43 minutes) is able to tire even those who are very pleased with the movie. Expand
9 of 18 users found this helpful99
All this user's reviews
9
yadevolOct 6, 2017
An absolute feast for the eyes {and ears} and despite it's running time and pace, absorbing and captivating. Unlike Arrival which I thought was very overrated and dare I say dull, Villeneuve has triumphed with this definitely worth the wait sequel.
16 of 30 users found this helpful1614
All this user's reviews
9
whoischarlotteNov 16, 2017
This was beautifully crafted and has a lovely style to it. Even with an almost 3 hours running time, it didn't drag and I didn't feel bored. Definitely recommend if you're a fan of the original.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
Butterbean1Oct 9, 2017
It's movies like Blade Runner 2049 that are keeping the magic of cinema alive and it absolutely demands to be experienced on the biggest screen available. Ignore the relatively few low scores and see arguably one of the best ever films of it's genre.
11 of 18 users found this helpful117
All this user's reviews
9
LUKEOPERCOUPJan 7, 2018
Easily one of the best movies in the gere among years.. since Avatar i think. With a lot of turn, while it's amazing to watch also catch your mind to think about things that are happening
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
BarreOct 6, 2017
Blade Runner 2049
Director: Dennis Villeneuve
Release Date: October 6, 2017 I cannot stress enough to see this movie only seeing the first trailer to come out and because I don’t want to spoil the story I wont be delving into the summary of
Blade Runner 2049
Director: Dennis Villeneuve
Release Date: October 6, 2017

I cannot stress enough to see this movie only seeing the first trailer to come out and because I don’t want to spoil the story I wont be delving into the summary of the film only the reasons it deserves your attention.. My expectations were set at this middling point of ok fro this film. I though they are either building upon the classic sci-fi masterpiece Blade Runner (released in 1982), or they are delivering this film for a complete cash in and an investment banking on the new generation liking it inevitably setting up future films they aren't necessary franchise films. But that’s the key word in describing Blade Runners brilliance, necessary. Sequels hardly ever do good because they weren't planned to be made, they feel like excess lore that usually feels only questionably fitting. But Blade Runner 2049 not only fits into the blade runner universe, but after seeing it I realized it filled a whole in my heart I didn’t realize I had. Blade Runner 2049 is going to be a pillar of a film I point to that stresses the masterful skill we have today. Roger Deacons , Hans Zimmer, and Dennis Villeneuve form a cinema dream team. The music rumbles with prestige at the perfect moments to exemplify the intensity in the scene. The cinematography is simply some of the best work I've seen from Roger Deacons (also known as one of the most revered and talented cinematographers to hit the industry) with such an expanded amount of colors and riveting set pieces truly do the job of immersing you in this universe. And Dennis Villeneuve has proven himself a master in this new era of film making; transcending one of the greatest films ever made with a story (which I wont spoil) that hooks you with thought provoking themes, sharp turns to keep from falling into predictableness and tugging on the moral heartstrings fantastically all while building these few but very memorable characters with unflinching performances. Everything is delivered with such refinement, Blade Runner 2049 earns the respect from new film goers and fans of the original alike, being one of the greatest sequels ever made and the best film of the year.
Expand
11 of 23 users found this helpful1112
All this user's reviews
9
imraankOct 8, 2017
Visually stunning. Lack of context may come about for some who have not seen the original and may not result as an enjoyable experience within terms of storyline. Denis Villeneuve is the next Nolan.
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
9
OctavisOct 8, 2017
BR2049 is a masterpiece, a brilliantly directed and absolutely visually stunning film. BR2049 compliments the original 1982 Blade Runner cult classic with action, drama, suspense and a plot which connects the original film perfectly. The filmBR2049 is a masterpiece, a brilliantly directed and absolutely visually stunning film. BR2049 compliments the original 1982 Blade Runner cult classic with action, drama, suspense and a plot which connects the original film perfectly. The film is a must see in an IMAX theater to fully appreciate everything BR2049 has to offer however it is a must see on the big screen. Finally a film has been made that reminds me of why we go to the movies. One of the best films you will ever experience in IMAX or the big screen. Blade Runner 2049 is a must see... Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
9
Jibun86Oct 9, 2017
First of all I must say the original movie is my favorite movie of all times. That said, and taking into account the expectations I had over the movie I must say it is a remarkable film.
Its pacing is similar to the original and not even
First of all I must say the original movie is my favorite movie of all times. That said, and taking into account the expectations I had over the movie I must say it is a remarkable film.
Its pacing is similar to the original and not even closer to what the trailer let us thought would be a frenetic action film.
Plot is deep and well led by the main mystery which I found unexpected and very well-chosen. And the cast performs really well, special mention to Ryan Gosling and its character.
There is not doubt the movie is visually impeccable, however I had opposed feelings about it. I found it not to be exactly faithful to the original with too much light in general and partially losing the retro aspect of the original.
The sound was OK, but far away from the greatness of the original and you can easily notice it when a piece of the 82's movie sounds in the new film.
I cannot say if new audiences will like it, but for those who already knew Blade Runner it will be at least a decent sequel.
Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
9
adamako666Oct 11, 2017
One of the best films i have seen in a long time. This film takes the concepts of the first film and expands on them beautifully. The cinematography is awesome making every scene a feast for the eyes. The soundtrack accompanies thisOne of the best films i have seen in a long time. This film takes the concepts of the first film and expands on them beautifully. The cinematography is awesome making every scene a feast for the eyes. The soundtrack accompanies this marvelously, at times invading your personal space. It was also nice to hear some of the original soundtrack included in the film. I would recommend this film to anyone, including people who did not enjoy the first one (although you really should watch the first before viewing). Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
9
SomeRandomGuy00Oct 11, 2017
It's been years since I've experienced a movie in theatres where almost every image left me in awe. Not impressed, not merely captivated, but in awe. In most “good looking” films, it's easy to find several scenes in images where your eyesIt's been years since I've experienced a movie in theatres where almost every image left me in awe. Not impressed, not merely captivated, but in awe. In most “good looking” films, it's easy to find several scenes in images where your eyes feel like shrugging compared to the rest of the film's imagery. It was difficult to find very many scenes like that in Blade Runner 2049. Even when there's next to no visual action going on in the frame, these images still find a way to impress. But thankfully, there's more to Blade Runner 2049 than just pretty pictures. Director Denis Villeneuve never forgets that this is a Blade Runner movie, a dark mystery about what it really means to be human in a world filled to the brim with advanced technology. The lovely visuals aid the story, instead of trying to bury it.

The sound design also really helps in bringing this troubled world to life. The musical score, while lacking the magic of Vangelis's score for the original film, still works in harmony with the moods and emotions for each scene. From throat-singing in Wallace's (Jared Leto) chamber, to the menacing drums used for a futuristic L.A.P.D. tower, to the playful chimes used in Detective K's romantic encounters with the optimistic Joi (Ana De Armas); these little touches in the soundtrack truly emphasize the emotion of each scene. Again, supporting the film, not trying to make up for it. It's a miracle that this soundtrack turned out as good as it did, considering the last minute change of composers and the fact that the soundtrack is almost entirely original. And of course, a dystopia could never come to life without convincing sound effects, and Blade Runner 2049 is no exception. This is an overused statement, but every sound used outside of the soundtrack truly feels real. No blaster sounds, no explosions that sound way quieter than they should, and no other silly overused sci-fi sound effects. Every bang, crash, jump, shot, step, and yell sounds exactly like it should. For example, in Dave Bautista's scene, we originally find him farming in a heavy radioactive suit. And with that moment, we can hear the heavy steps, echoes, and breathing that would go on in such a suit. The audience is there in his suit, and we didn't need any cheap POV or overlong establishing shots to get that level of immersion. It's such a short, inconsequential scene, but it's impressive that even the smallest scenes in Blade Runner 2049 are trying to pull you into its world instead of pushing you away.

And then, we arrive at the final stage of crafting a fictional world: the characters. Admittedly, there are few characters that feel like they never get any time to properly develop. Although, looking back at the film, maybe that's because I enjoyed their company so much. Ryan Gosling, an actor who should win the most improved actor award at this point, is perfect as a morally conflicted detective. I truly believed every step of his struggle, every emotion he conveyed, and every blow to his face. And this is all done without a shred of overacting or “phoning it in”, so to speak. Harrison Ford, reprising his role as Deckard, feels like he's actually acting this time. I was afraid that he was gonna “Bruce Willis” this important role, but he actually delivered. Is it because Harrison actually cares about this character? Or because the director cared enough to get him to actually act? Who knows? What matters is that he conveys a character that is both emotionally devastated and slightly desensitized to his previous events. All of the actors also suit their characters quite well, especially Jared Leto as Wallace and Ana De Armas as Joi. The actors certainly make the film's world all the more interesting and emotional, even when the story and writing fail to do so.

It truly shows how special this film is, however, that these story flaws seem so small. This is still an intriguing mystery story with a lot of tricks up it's sleeve, even for longtime fans of Blade Runner and dystopian Science Fiction. It's also impressive that the film never loses touch of it's themes, like the first film this is still a story about how life and reality can even be considered special in a society filled with technology and prejudice. And it's a breath of fresh air that every aspect of the film effectively conveys that message, instead of just a clever script and a few great performances. Yes, the film isn't quite as smart or clever as it's predecessor, but any movie that gets even close to reaching the magic of Blade Runner is well worth your time. The visual experience alone is worth the price of admission, but thankfully there's so much more lurking beneath the smooth surface.

See it in IMAX if you can.
Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews