Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)

5

zouz123Jan 26, 2015

I can't say it's awful and can't say it's excellent. This is is an overrated average movie that is completely forgettable. This is the type of movie that you watch once, and only once, and you may even think that it would've been better ifI can't say it's awful and can't say it's excellent. This is is an overrated average movie that is completely forgettable. This is the type of movie that you watch once, and only once, and you may even think that it would've been better if you didn't see it at all. The life of a demented Broadway actor, who gives a damn. Was completely bored and uninterested throughout the whole movie.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

1

supemoneylifeJan 25, 2015

I saw this described as a comedy but i cant say that it made me laugh even once. It seems more like some arty pose stuff to 'showcase' actors. I didnt like it tbh. I left half way thru so maybe it gets good about a hour in.

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

8

geedupJan 24, 2015

Keaton was very good in this flick and Norton was perfectly cast at his opposite. The story meanders a bit but the film does not seem to be too long with a message of self reaffirmation tied with self doubt/past success.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

tjuradosJan 23, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Master piece. It`s a piece of modern art. A new classic. Perfect script. Talent acting. Revolution editing. .... YOU NEED TO WATCH IT. BUY A TICKET AND ENJOY.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

pacame13Jan 23, 2015

By far the best movie of the year. Best written and best acted. Should win the oscar!! Alejandro revolutionizes film-making. I can´t believe they are comparing the failure of Boyhood with this piece of art.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

duncan1964Jan 23, 2015

A biting satire on the entertainment industry, Birman is a tour de force of filmmaking that will take your breath away. An actor once famous for super hero movies is trying to reinvent himself as a serious actor on Broadway, but at every turnA biting satire on the entertainment industry, Birman is a tour de force of filmmaking that will take your breath away. An actor once famous for super hero movies is trying to reinvent himself as a serious actor on Broadway, but at every turn he is beset by problems, both professional and personal. Keaton gives a career best performance, and the directing and editing will have you scratching your head as you try and work out just how they did it… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Fb29Jan 22, 2015

The best film I have seen in a couple years. Very hard to explain. I think every explanation falls short. I recommend watching this when you are in the mood for a serious movie that rewards close attention.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

kinoralphJan 22, 2015

This is art in its best form. The direction, the music, the editing are so well build. The best part is the conclusion because makes me realize how powerful the films can be in your own life.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

0

LeesaPeaceJan 22, 2015

Should have walked out in the first 10 minutes because it only got worse! Some viewers did walk out half way through. A load of egocentric rubbish that's as American as it can get. Lousy plot with terrible ending.

5 of 23 users found this helpful518

All this user's reviews

9

Toecutter71Jan 21, 2015

This movie maybe have on few spots some attempts to little bit downplay main intellectual force which are leading one and talk about emptiness of 99% present productions of Block Buster Hollywood philosophy which to be sincere is so selfThis movie maybe have on few spots some attempts to little bit downplay main intellectual force which are leading one and talk about emptiness of 99% present productions of Block Buster Hollywood philosophy which to be sincere is so self destructive in sense of U.S cinematography, that movie Birdman if somebody ask me maybe was not dare to go further,best proof is opinion from user jhull123 quote "The movie may seem difficult to understand for most" Does really exist need that movie be even more tough towards mediocrity and spiritual laziness of Hollywood's almighty's such as average cinema spectators.That is main motive behind all others , "black humor""gray humor " etc scene. Should i say "Our Hero" struggle to not surrender and signed "Birdman 4" aka "BATMAN 6" or "TAKEN 9" Acting is excellent on the moments even above, I wish not to Michael Keaton take main role because of course some of acting bravuras executed by Edward Norton, Such as my favorite U.S actress of Younger-middle age(sory Naomi) generation Naomi Wats which simply blow me in the 21-gr...over all others participant actors...… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

mrhonthyJan 21, 2015

The sound of drums play as we hear Riggan Thomson (Michael Keaton) for the first time. We see him from behind, in just his underwear, levitating off the ground. The former superhero movie star is in his Broadway dressing room looking out ontoThe sound of drums play as we hear Riggan Thomson (Michael Keaton) for the first time. We see him from behind, in just his underwear, levitating off the ground. The former superhero movie star is in his Broadway dressing room looking out onto the world from his window. All the while a voice in his head is growling, the devil on his shoulder, judging his every move.
Keaton plays a washed up actor who used to be a box office superhero star decades before. He is trying to get his last big hit on Broadway, which he directs and in which stars. But for Riggan, it is hard because his alter-ego makes him doubt himself all the time. His alter superhero background in the film is clearly an allusion to Keaton’s role as Batman back in 1989 and this realistic film references other box office superheroes such as Robert Downey Jr. and Jeremy Renner by making jokes about how they’re all “wearing capes now.”
Birdman guides you through a journey of tight staircases and crowded hallways. You experience the fictional flight of Riggan, escaping his daily stress as he soars above skyscrapers. You can feel the pain of Emma Stone’s character, Sam, as she watches her father’s rapid break down. These perfectly choreographed shots are just the beginning of the many things that are great about Birdman. Every scene is accompanied by a powerful score and incredible acting.
The biggest struggle Riggan has with his play,“What We Talk About When We Talk About Love,” is his co-star, Mike Shiner. After the lead actor gets injured on set, Shiner is called to fill in before audience previews. Shiner, portrayed by Edward Norton, known for Fight Club and American History X. He is an outgoing actor who acts as if he is just being himself on stage, but he is self-absorbed and shallow off it. Shiner struggles to find his way as a human being and how to become the best he can be. Lesley, played by Naomi Watts who is known for The Impossible, Shiner’s significant other, is fulfilling her childhood dream of playing on Broadway. Her stress over her first Broadway role, coupled with Shiner playing her stage love interest, is a recipe for disaster.
Another actor who pulls off a great role, is none other than Zach Galifianakis. As Riggan’s manager and best friend, Brandon Vander Hey, he helps him through his toughest moments and does his best to make everything right. Amy Ryan, who was in Gone Baby Gone, plays Riggan’s ex-wife. She only has brief screen time, but through her presence, we witness Riggan at his lowest and highest points.
In the end, every actor in this movie does a huge amount work to pull of such a phenomenal production and the director, Alejandro G. Iñárritu, made a fantastic film. Birdman is a rollercoaster that shows us that we must hit rock bottom to rise back up, and it is one of the best movies you will see all year.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

0

TomMattJan 20, 2015

The first hour is too boring. The drums playing in the back all the time makes me wanna go home. Edward Norton was the true star in this movie, is ridiculous how the other guy is overrated. He doesn't deserve to be nominated for a Oscar.

9 of 17 users found this helpful98

All this user's reviews

2

royphishoohJan 19, 2015

Yet another overrated Oscar nomination. Keaton's character is interesting, but overall the film is dull and pretentious. The irony bludgeons when is should deliver a light touch.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

3

HeiligebimbamJan 19, 2015

Maybe the euphoria surrounding this film pushed my expectations too high, but whatever the reasons I found this to be an average film. It was enjoyable, but nothing out of the ordinary. Considering that they give Oscars for a lot of rubbishMaybe the euphoria surrounding this film pushed my expectations too high, but whatever the reasons I found this to be an average film. It was enjoyable, but nothing out of the ordinary. Considering that they give Oscars for a lot of rubbish films these days, I am not surprised at the nominations, but I would not give it any awards whatsoever.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

5

dennismachJan 19, 2015

Such a very self-indulgent movie. More about "the actor" and the acting profession than a watchable movie. As a side note, mental illnes of the magnitude shown in the moive typically on-sets at age 20 - 30, and by age 50 - 60, the person isSuch a very self-indulgent movie. More about "the actor" and the acting profession than a watchable movie. As a side note, mental illnes of the magnitude shown in the moive typically on-sets at age 20 - 30, and by age 50 - 60, the person is well medicated or at least not surprised by its onset. I'll pass.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

8

AndoniZarrJan 18, 2015

Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu's finest work. Unfortunately to me, it still feels pretentious in many ways. Somehow A.G.I. always gives the impression that the only thing he is interested in when making a feature is in winning awards. He reallyAlejandro Gonzalez Inarritu's finest work. Unfortunately to me, it still feels pretentious in many ways. Somehow A.G.I. always gives the impression that the only thing he is interested in when making a feature is in winning awards. He really knows the "Hollywood critics recipe" (if we can call it that way), trying to be objective here, not everyone can manage to create a film that will be effective for the award season, so lets say he excels at doing that. Putting that judgement aside, the fact is that Birdman includes outstanding performances from Micheal Keaton, Edward Norton (in my opinion he is even more impressive than Keaton) and Emma Stone. As always, Emmanuel Lubezki showcases a visual delight that proves why he is one of the most talented cinematographers of the century. The film's score is also something that must be appreciated as one of a kind.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

ThegodfathersonJan 18, 2015

Birdman is my favorite movie ever made, not even The Godfather has brought us masterful direction, acting and the most brilliant writing ever in history. Micheal Keaton deserves an Oscar and Edward Norton has done the best role since FightBirdman is my favorite movie ever made, not even The Godfather has brought us masterful direction, acting and the most brilliant writing ever in history. Micheal Keaton deserves an Oscar and Edward Norton has done the best role since Fight Club. Loved it, please give this a watch on the big screen. Its not another boring drama, its a superhero drama with soul.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

0

WindupgirlJan 18, 2015

I walked out after an hour. Don't worry...I've read how this piece of trash ends.

The people reviewing on this site are delusional...I'd much rather watch Seth Lloyd give a You Tube lecture on quantum mechanics. His laugh alone is moreI walked out after an hour. Don't worry...I've read how this piece of trash ends.

The people reviewing on this site are delusional...I'd much rather watch Seth Lloyd give a You Tube lecture on quantum mechanics. His laugh alone is more engaging than this nonsense...… Expand

13 of 19 users found this helpful136

All this user's reviews

2

AkashVijayJan 18, 2015

All credit to Lubezki for his stunning camera work and to all the actors for bringing their A game. But despite their best efforts Birdman doesn't work. So much of it feels self-consciously quirky and in many cases, downright sophomoric. TheAll credit to Lubezki for his stunning camera work and to all the actors for bringing their A game. But despite their best efforts Birdman doesn't work. So much of it feels self-consciously quirky and in many cases, downright sophomoric. The film's most embarrassing attempt at humour is when Mike (Edward Norton) describes an ageing theatre critic (Lindsay Duncan) as having a face that looks "like she just licked a homeless man's ass." Really? That’s what passes for funny these days?
But the biggest problem with the film is its utter superficiality and pretentiousness. Tackling everything from the challenge of living in the present in a post-as-it-happens world, to the struggles of modern-day parenting, to the uncomfortable compromises made for celebrity status, to the folly of critics who aren't "courageous" enough to offer the world anything but cynicism, this film is all over the map. Sadly not one theme is explored with a shred of depth. Same can be said for a lot of Inarritu's previous films (babel most notably). Birdman is ambitious but flawed and ultimately self-defeating.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

0

dierregiJan 18, 2015

Washed up Hollywood star Riggan wants to prove he is a “real” actor by directing and starring a play on Broadway. But perhaps he cannot, because he is mental.

Wrapped around the claustrophobic world of actors, the movie is an exercise inWashed up Hollywood star Riggan wants to prove he is a “real” actor by directing and starring a play on Broadway. But perhaps he cannot, because he is mental.

Wrapped around the claustrophobic world of actors, the movie is an exercise in navel-gazing and smugness. I guess it must be a big deal for a Hollywood superstar to prove to his peers that he is not just a money-making machine but also a talented actor. However, I truly do not care about the hysterics and anguish of Hollywood actors.

That is why, when Birdman was acclaimed by the critics I already suspected yet another inflated balloon full of nothing. I waited until I could watch the movie for free, because I was very reluctant to waste money on yet another “Academy-worth” piece of crap and I am very happy I saved my hard-earned money.

The joke is twice on the audience, because the other theme explored by Birdman, besides narcissist actors, is audience stupidity. Not being the sort of person who cares about superheroes movies, I was nevertheless annoyed by the fact that the public of said movies is vilified by this piece of elitist crap.
It is difficult to point out what I disliked most about Birdman, since I hated everything: the overbearing drum soundtrack, characters shouting their lines, the smugness of the whole concept, the patronizing dialogues, etc… I do not even think Keaton was so great in it.

Finally, it is depressing to notice that the number of movies I want to walk out from is increasing exponentially. After decades of watching movies, what I expect is an interesting story told in an engaging way, but what I find is more and more egotistic directors busy only with producing crap bearing their trademark signature, being it Tim Burton Goth-chic or Wes Anderson smug-naïve.… Expand

13 of 19 users found this helpful136

All this user's reviews

3

shaunmedJan 17, 2015

Not without merit but reviews of this film are again an example of an industry that celebrates itself. The story is just plain uninteresting and never gains any emotional involvement from the viewer as the protagonist is confused even in hisNot without merit but reviews of this film are again an example of an industry that celebrates itself. The story is just plain uninteresting and never gains any emotional involvement from the viewer as the protagonist is confused even in his own role.… Expand

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

10

TheDavoJan 17, 2015

A remarkable movie for an American movie. If you are looking for the hallmarks of a typical American movie like fart jokes, juvenile humor, meaningless nudity or super heroes, this is the wrong movie. Wonderful story, wonderfulA remarkable movie for an American movie. If you are looking for the hallmarks of a typical American movie like fart jokes, juvenile humor, meaningless nudity or super heroes, this is the wrong movie. Wonderful story, wonderful performances. Probably the best American movie of the year.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

5

21gramsJan 17, 2015

This movie is so overrated, I almost cannot believe it got so many nominations for oscars. The movie has nothing to offer apart Michael Keaton. It's just mediocre movie about mediocre theater play. Don't know why, but critics buy thisThis movie is so overrated, I almost cannot believe it got so many nominations for oscars. The movie has nothing to offer apart Michael Keaton. It's just mediocre movie about mediocre theater play. Don't know why, but critics buy this pseudo-innovative weirdness as a pure art, but it's just lots of bull*** squeezed into one movie.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

6

alexnexusJan 16, 2015

If Ego were a human been, it would have casted, co-written and directed this movie long, long, long time ago..... -having Pretentious as its producer.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

9

patty2koolJan 16, 2015

First of all a very fine cinematography by Alejandro G. Iñárritu,the movie speaks the fine realm between truth and ignorance .The more the protagonist (riggan) fights with his own ignorant truth the more virtue he gets from the realisticFirst of all a very fine cinematography by Alejandro G. Iñárritu,the movie speaks the fine realm between truth and ignorance .The more the protagonist (riggan) fights with his own ignorant truth the more virtue he gets from the realistic cult of film art.
Moreover, the scene by Michael Keaton,where he fights with Zach Galifianakis ,the imitation is commendable hats off,u need to be the best actor in this academies.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

nicholasbertJan 16, 2015

Birdman is a powerhouse of a film that never stops entertaining - the devil is in the details here more than anywhere, and one can't quite name what is it that grips so much. The satire is rampant though dismissive, the irony is subtle, theBirdman is a powerhouse of a film that never stops entertaining - the devil is in the details here more than anywhere, and one can't quite name what is it that grips so much. The satire is rampant though dismissive, the irony is subtle, the double identity dilemma is plain fantastic. There's wide use of some Lynch-esque magic, paired with brutal reality, and a great performance by Michael Keaton. Edward Norton is hilarious as the hyperbolic Hollywood superstar, and Emma Stone's fierce acting is spot-on.

There are few missteps in Birdman, and they're forgotten quite soon. A limping drumset sets the score to the best comedy of the past year.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

4

gdog243Jan 15, 2015

I don't understand the love this movie is getting. It seems to be riding on a gimmick of shooting it on one shot, but I found it nauseating and just ok. Also, the score might be one of the most annoying scores I've heard in film in a long time.

8 of 14 users found this helpful86

All this user's reviews

10

anshimanJan 15, 2015

Its deft balance between dark and light elements as well as its strikingly original cinematography, grit, and epiphanic insights into identity and individuality distinguishes it as one of the best of the year, if not the very best. InarrituIts deft balance between dark and light elements as well as its strikingly original cinematography, grit, and epiphanic insights into identity and individuality distinguishes it as one of the best of the year, if not the very best. Inarritu immaculately chooses bleak colour palettes and a nuanced percussive score to illustrate an atmosphere that teems with energy, electricity and realism, fleshing out vivid characters with great acting and even better dialogue. 'Birdman' is a character study, a deliciously intelligent satire and a dark comedy, all wrapped up in one gorgeous masterwork of true visual art.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

3

Tone01Jan 15, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Look at me! My film is brilliant, the rest are crap.

While there are strokes of brilliance and humor in "Birdman," the sum effect is ennui and shock at the narcissistic disdain the director holds for audiences.

The plot is simple enough: a huge action star (Keaton) refusing to add another franchise film to his resume attempts to break away by mounting a pretentious, overstuffed play based on Raymond Carver's writings. A coterie of malcontents and neurotics abet Keaton. Using an experimental brush loaded with mysticism, surrealism and existential angst, Iñárritu follows the on and off stage drama in one take. (Acclimating to the lack of cuts takes a few moments, but an unbroken shot does not really add to this story just as it failed in Hitchcock's "Rope.")

The good is aforementioned. Unfortunately, the bad tilts the scale way over.

Partly meant as commentary about the nature of art and distilling culture to the lowest common denominator, the director beats a dead horse, resuscitates, and then beats it to death again.

Add commentary about the craft of acting on stage and film and stumbling upon success.

Ironically, those who are drawn by this big budget art film have the sophistication to realize the message already. Those who wouldn't see "Birdman" on a bet, the audience whose nose elitist Iñárritu tweaks, will never receive the message. Why should they? People like what they like, and if they like cotton candy let them go forth and eat. Only one with a huge ego – this director – would have the temerity to call anyone on their preferences.

Then add narcissistic, whining actors portraying every showbiz cliché while the film spools on and on and on.

Then add the irony of effects like those in frowned upon action tentpoles are what made the single shot possible in "Birdman."

The actors bought into this story. They give it their all and do good work, particularly Edward Norton. However, Zach Galifinakis proves he's out of his depth outside man-child roles for which he's best known. One wonders if Galifinakis was cast to prove the director's corollary.

Slow, boring, distasteful and insulting does not offer a pleasant experience. The best to be said is "Birdman" tried for heights others fear to attempt. Like Icarus, the wax melted.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

8

ToFewViewsJan 14, 2015

Birdman is a step forward in Filmaking, It adds a whole new level of immersion to the film by making it seem like one contentious shot. Other films like "Children Of Men" Have used the same method but never to this extent. This film gives youBirdman is a step forward in Filmaking, It adds a whole new level of immersion to the film by making it seem like one contentious shot. Other films like "Children Of Men" Have used the same method but never to this extent. This film gives you the feeling of being right there with the actors. The story follows Michael Keaton as an actor on Broadway trying to put together a play after quitting his roll as "Birdman" in 1992. The play he is in is becoming increasing difficult to keep together and the pressure starts to weight down upon him and the other actors.
The acting in this film is easily one it's strong points, with most actors/actresses having extremely deep and well preformed monologues as well as great overall performances.
The story has great writing as well with tons of commentary on Actors and Hollywood of Today. From Horrible Media, Hateful Critics and Actors ego's/Persona's.
Overall this film is beautiful and very enjoyable. I found myself captivated by it, But by the end of the film I had a bit of that "Um, What" Felling but in a good way.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

1

Mancunian2014Jan 13, 2015

I went in to see Birdman with zero expectations and thank goodness I did. Aside from the lovely Naomi Watts and the newcomer (to me) Miss Riseborough, there is very little I could like, let alone tolerate, in this movie. The continuousI went in to see Birdman with zero expectations and thank goodness I did. Aside from the lovely Naomi Watts and the newcomer (to me) Miss Riseborough, there is very little I could like, let alone tolerate, in this movie. The continuous camera rolling is really nothing innovative (way to copy Russian Ark, Inarritu...) so I don't understand what all the fuss over that was. Moreover, the film was simply loud with too much yelling, breaking and torturous drum-beat music. I had a headache after leaving the theatre. Just because it's "New Yawk and Broadway, baby" doesn't mean poor viewers need to be practically browbeaten into loving it with noise, aggression and uncontrolled emotions that are impossible to empathize with.

And of course the movie's failed plot line and tasteless attempt attempt to make light of a has-been actor's possible schizophrenia was probably a better idea on paper than in "real", cinematographic life. Birdman is really just the result of a film student not listening to his elders when they've said, "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should." And all of you should not watch this demnetia, whether you can or can't. Please do not feed this giant troll of movie that so many otherwise logical and nice people seem to love and urinate adulation over.… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

1

MurrayTJan 11, 2015

This is a good example of the disconnect between film critics and movie goers. The critics watch so many movies, and here they see something different and they're intrigued. However, different doesn't mean good, and this movie is not good. ItThis is a good example of the disconnect between film critics and movie goers. The critics watch so many movies, and here they see something different and they're intrigued. However, different doesn't mean good, and this movie is not good. It spans from boring to ridiculous to can't-wait-until-it's-over.
Critics fawn over the art of the film, and there indeed it may earn 8 of 10. The rest of us are interested in the entertainment of the movie, and that's where it earns 1 of 10.… Expand

12 of 19 users found this helpful127

All this user's reviews

10

Beardfull1Jan 11, 2015

Excellent movie, has all the right ingredients. Great script, fantastic acting an masterful execution.
A masterpiece.
The filming, camera movement and placement and specially the direction was just outstanding.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

tvnewsguidoJan 11, 2015

It's a movie about neurotic actors.

If you think you would enjoy spending two hours with a neurotic actor - you should enjoy this film. I found every "twist" predictable which was annoying. The performances are great but the fact thatIt's a movie about neurotic actors.

If you think you would enjoy spending two hours with a neurotic actor - you should enjoy this film.

I found every "twist" predictable which was annoying. The performances are great but the fact that they are so convincing as neurotic actors means you really have to enjoy that world to enjoy the film.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

SoxerJan 10, 2015

This has to be probably the worst film I have seen in easily the last 15 years. I agree with the others on this platform who low rated it. Yes the camera work was highly irritating as was the be bop (if that's what it was) music drumwork. NoThis has to be probably the worst film I have seen in easily the last 15 years. I agree with the others on this platform who low rated it. Yes the camera work was highly irritating as was the be bop (if that's what it was) music drumwork. No story, complex dialogue that said nothing. I too regret sitting through this movie. I certainly didn't see it as a black comedy or as any form of entertainment.… Expand

18 of 26 users found this helpful188

All this user's reviews

4

markmunroJan 9, 2015

i will start by saying i didn't particularly enjoy this film, i will agree with what many others have said and that it was a good idea and had some hugely interesting themes and sub-plots running throughout, sadly i just found it long,i will start by saying i didn't particularly enjoy this film, i will agree with what many others have said and that it was a good idea and had some hugely interesting themes and sub-plots running throughout, sadly i just found it long, ponderous and pretentious, i got how the lead character was portraying how we are all trying to find our place in the world and how he was scared he was going to be forgotten after he was gone and I also got how the film was about the lead character's personal battles vs schizophrenia and also on how to be a success in hollywood (make something 'meaningful' vs selling-out and also a comment of what these two things actually mean and whether or not these things are actually nonsense when compared to real-life success in being a man, being a good father, husband etc), it was also a comment on big hollywood blockbusters vs real art whilst also simultaneously mocking the over-pretentious nature of theatre, all very clever, it was just delivered in an overly-long and slow manner, i also hated the inane freestyle jazz drumming which constantly repeated itself throughout and the single shot camera trickery did my head in too, this though is just my opinion, if you don't agree fair enough, i don't care.… Expand

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

10

JurassicParkFanJan 8, 2015

Great Movie and I love every minute of it. I don't know who the director of the movie is, bit this is a movie worth watching at home on your very own blu-ray set. ****

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

manofthemoonJan 8, 2015

Fascinating character story of a faded movie actor breaking down in his one last shot at being taken seriously at he stages his self written, directed, starring ego trip to Broadway. Keaton is first rate in the central role, as are the restFascinating character story of a faded movie actor breaking down in his one last shot at being taken seriously at he stages his self written, directed, starring ego trip to Broadway. Keaton is first rate in the central role, as are the rest of the cast, especially Norton as the quintessential Method flake who brings additional press and unpredictable chaos to Keaton's already crumbling world. Not an easy watch but worthwhile. As to whether the end is rewarding or a cop out...?… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

TheRocksBarneyJan 8, 2015

“Birdman (Or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)” is a simply excellent film. Why? There is a scene in “Birdman” where Riggan Thompson (played by Michael Keaton), who is trying to direct and star in his Broadway adaptation of the Raymond“Birdman (Or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)” is a simply excellent film. Why? There is a scene in “Birdman” where Riggan Thompson (played by Michael Keaton), who is trying to direct and star in his Broadway adaptation of the Raymond Carver play “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love”, walks towards the front of the stage and talks about love, what it is to be loved, and how we all crave that. But is it love we crave? Or, as Sam (played by Emma Stone) puts it, is Riggan confusing love with admiration? These are some of the many wide-ranging questions that “Birdman” leaves you with as you leave the cinema and you thus don’t really realise how good the cast, direction, dialogue and score are until you’ve given up on those questions, realising that they are just too difficult to answer.
The cast is simply stellar in “Birdman”, brilliantly led by Michael Keaton in what Variety’s Peter Debruge calls the “comeback of the century” and which I agree with him over. However, I’m not sure if Michael Keaton would accept this title, in a recent interview promoting the film he laughed at the concept, yet the comparisons between his career and that of Riggans are unavoidable, he also laughed when this was bought up too. But, to be fair, all I knew of Michael Keaton before I saw “Birdman” was that he had starred in the 1989 “Batman” film as well as in its 1992 sequel “Batman Returns”. His career hasn’t been stellar and it’s a surprise I even knew his name before I saw “Birdman” really… But his performance in this film deserves all the attention he gets and all the awards he is being nominated for. Riggan is a complex character and you are never quite sure about him, how he feeling and how he feels towards others, not only because of how Riggan changes as the film goes on but also because of how that reflects the ever-changing nature of the film, moving from one question or theme to the other without actually leaving it behind, instead leaving it in the back of your mind for you to think about later.
Again, as I said earlier, the rest of the cast is great too. Edward Norton is brilliant (playing the self-obsessed, ego-driven actor who feels more real on the stage than off it, Mike Shiner). But then Miles is so much more than that and again it’s hard to put your finger on what or who he is and what he is looking for. Zach Galifanakis (playing Riggan’s agent, Jake) who is trying to keep Riggan grounded, is also brilliant and then so is Emma Stone and Naomi Watts (although both seem to be in very familiar roles). I could go on listing actors and actresses but it would just be a paragraph of names. (Last one I promise but Amy Ryan also does well playing Riggan’s ex-wife Slyvia.)
But each of these is alleviated, and should thanking him in any of their Oscars speeches, by the film’s director, Alejandro González Iñárritu. Alejandro hasn’t done many English-Language films before (except Babel in 2006 and 21 Grams in 2003), and considering that, it makes his direction in “Birdman” even more outstanding. Where he really excels is in how “Birdman” is seemingly filmed in one take. These really emphasise how good the acting is in this film, be it a monologue by Emma Stone as she rants at her dad, a take that involves Michael Keaton walking in just his underpants through Times Square, or a scene where Keaton and Edward Norton rehearse on stage. What makes these one takes even better is how the film is almost entirely set in St. James Theatre and you really get a feel for it as you glide around it in these one takes, feeling, seeing and hearing everything that is going on. It truly is an experience. I loved every moment of it and what this ultimately did for me was make me feel like I was part of the production, as if I was being given this behind the scenes look at what was going on. This thrill inspired me to get back into acting, something that I used to do a lot of. What happens with this you as the film goes on, you begin to realise that this is less of a trip to the cinema and more of a trip to the theatre. It’s a good mix of both and I can’t really imagine it being the same on DVD, although it never is. I will definitely be seeing it again.

Birdman’s dialogue is great too and it matches the fast-paced score of “Birdman”. Both match how unique “Birdman” is. And that is where its brilliance lies. Just like how when you are in a production and the curtains come down on closing night you come to think that you really did not want that to end, and I had the same feeling when “Birdman” did. Its cast, score and direction are all what will be directly nominated come the Oscars, but there is no specific award for the questions “Birdman” made me think about, the way “Birdman” made me feel and the lessons “Birdman” taught me.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

zimmyJan 8, 2015

If you continue to believe that cinema is an important art-form despite all the formulaic dross, dumb gross-out comedies and save the world action 'heroes' that are now the standard fayre of most multiplexes then prepare to be delighted withIf you continue to believe that cinema is an important art-form despite all the formulaic dross, dumb gross-out comedies and save the world action 'heroes' that are now the standard fayre of most multiplexes then prepare to be delighted with Alejandro González Iñárritu's modern masterpiece. The story is gripping and groundbreaking, the performance from the stellar ensemble are awesome and the filming is a joy to behold. Edward Norton and Michael Keaton in particular give performances of towering splendour. The last movie I saw twice at the cinema was Pulp Fiction but I found I could not resist re-watching this. Having seen it a second time I feel it's like a great album...very good at first but something that reveals itself more clearly with repeated listenings (or in this case viewings). I could happily see it for a third time.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

ajarias96Jan 8, 2015

Birdman is indeed a cast effort. The entire cast gives exceptional performances and there is no weak link, it's as if each actor raised the other to the next level. The best example of this is with Emma Stone who gives her best performance toBirdman is indeed a cast effort. The entire cast gives exceptional performances and there is no weak link, it's as if each actor raised the other to the next level. The best example of this is with Emma Stone who gives her best performance to date. Stone goes head to head with veterans like Michael Keaton and Edward Norton and stays right there with them. The true highlight of Birdman is the cinematography by the genius that is Emmanuel Lubezki, after receiving his much deserved first Oscar for Gravity just a year ago he will surely win another this year for his superb work. The writing is funny and smart, the acting is brilliant, and the technicals are outstanding. Birdman is superbly directed and is truly an overall great movie… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

CalciferusJan 7, 2015

A very well made, well executed piece. Masterful performance from cast (Keaton in particular), superb soundtrack, disorienting yet unique cinematography and brilliant story, with an ending that would be discussed for quite sometime ;).

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

jhull123Jan 5, 2015

The movie may seem difficult to understand for most, but for some who have identified the film's connotations believe the film to shed light on some of the idiocies that today's audience has developed. In addition to its compelling contextThe movie may seem difficult to understand for most, but for some who have identified the film's connotations believe the film to shed light on some of the idiocies that today's audience has developed. In addition to its compelling context the ambiguity of the ending ranks this movie above all.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

Eon2323Jan 3, 2015

I cannot find anything wrong with this film. These are the types of films that remind the masses why movies are so important and entertaining. This film offers themes of duality, comedy, family, depression, drug/alcohol abuse, and esteem;I cannot find anything wrong with this film. These are the types of films that remind the masses why movies are so important and entertaining. This film offers themes of duality, comedy, family, depression, drug/alcohol abuse, and esteem; everything you would not only want but need in a piece of art like this. Such an unorthodox and nontraditional movie, but that's what makes it perfect. I love how the film looked like it was done in one shot as well. Definitely the best movie of 2014.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

oDjentoJan 2, 2015

This film could quite easily be the best film of the year, or maybe even the decade. Alejandro González Iñárritu wonderfully makes it feel like you are fully involved with the whole cast and film with his excellent camera work and editing,This film could quite easily be the best film of the year, or maybe even the decade. Alejandro González Iñárritu wonderfully makes it feel like you are fully involved with the whole cast and film with his excellent camera work and editing, making it feel like it’s all one shot: which it almost is. The acting is also top notch with elevated performances from Michael Keaton and Edward Norton and every other actor being superb in all their roles too. The story is also quite possibly the most original thing to have come out in the last 5-10 years maybe. The use of cinematography along with symbolism is flawlessly executed throughout the film and it is a joy to watch from start to finish, never dipping.
Now, the plot is basically a man who used to be a superhero star (Michael Keaton) wants to become relevant again and be taken seriously 20 years after his money making break as Birdman, and to do so he is putting on a Broadway theatre play that he writes, directs and stars in. However, he is struggling to keep stable as many things awry up and make him even more anxious about showing the play. It also doesn’t help that his old Birdman persona is mocking him narratively in his head. Each character is then fleshed out through the stories happenings and every character feels necessary and put to full affect in the film.
Another thing, this film gets it spot on with one scene that had me grinning about snooty, up themselves critics that see themselves above the theatrical world and how they label things instead of actually dissecting films/theatre etc. The scene played out wonderfully, but then again every scene does in this film.
Overall, this film was masterfully crafted. Acting, directing, characters, plot, cinematography, dialogue, themes and comedy are all implemented in an untouchable way that cements it as one of the greatest films of this day and age.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

NerdConsultantJan 2, 2015

this is a very good movie that is really well made and acted but I didn't love the film and i'm not quite sure why. maybe theres something wrong with me cause i was watching it thinking i should love this. maybe it's cause the films style isthis is a very good movie that is really well made and acted but I didn't love the film and i'm not quite sure why. maybe theres something wrong with me cause i was watching it thinking i should love this. maybe it's cause the films style is a bit overpowering and can be exhausting or that it goes on a bit too long and has a really bizarre ending. but i think it's down to it's implied contempt towards blockbusters which is distracting. that being said it's still a good movie with some of michael Keaton ,Zach Galifianakis and emma stone's best perfomances… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

2

ealeydJan 2, 2015

This is a hugely disappointing film - some funny lines but the overall whole is just not up to it. Very up itself and desperate to show how clever the filmmaker is

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

0

screenqueenJan 1, 2015

This film should be called the Emperor's New Wings. It's as irrelevant and pretentious as the characters on screen. I was thankful for the gimmicky "single shot" technique as it gave me something to watch for two painful hours. Of course, IThis film should be called the Emperor's New Wings. It's as irrelevant and pretentious as the characters on screen. I was thankful for the gimmicky "single shot" technique as it gave me something to watch for two painful hours. Of course, I fell for the hype surrounding this awful film. The drum track is annoying.As others have said, "different" does not mean "better." As far as calling it a comedy, I'm not sure what idiot decided that. I snickered maybe twice, but never even laughed aloud. This movie was pigeon poop.… Expand

14 of 22 users found this helpful148

All this user's reviews

10

TheFilmFanaticDec 31, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Birdman is an unusually fulfilling black comedy with superb writing and excellent direction. The cinematography is absolute perfection with the use of one continuous shot throughout the entire film, giving cohesion to the narrative. The story was realistic and intriguing putting a washed-up superhero actor into the shoes of a washed-up superhero actor. Keaton's portrayal of Kiggan is brilliant, giving an Oscar-worthy performance that raises the question of how much of it was really acting? Edward Norton and Emma Stone also deliver phenomenal performances in an all around fantastic film.

Of course Birdman isn't for everyone given its use of art film techniques, but that should not detract from its brilliantly obscure story-telling. If this film is foreshadowing the future of superhero actors then bring on the Robert Downey Jr theatre productions.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

WheelzFourReelzDec 28, 2014

No movie this year has full capitalized movies as art like Birdman did. Everything from the cinematography to the acting to the premise to the dialogue to the humor to the drama to the score is nailed perfectly. My only gripe is that the filmNo movie this year has full capitalized movies as art like Birdman did. Everything from the cinematography to the acting to the premise to the dialogue to the humor to the drama to the score is nailed perfectly. My only gripe is that the film runs a little long, but it's a small nitpick. Every movie lover needs to see this film at some point in their life.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

8

omnificentDec 26, 2014

This a very exciting film visually, with almost every scene shot with close-ups that so much in your face that it feels like the action is crowding your personal space. Also, the scene in which Keaton and Norton engage in an actor'sThis a very exciting film visually, with almost every scene shot with close-ups that so much in your face that it feels like the action is crowding your personal space. Also, the scene in which Keaton and Norton engage in an actor's version of a fistfight is one the funniest things I've seen in the movies this year (although I was the only one in the theater laughing uproariously). I was not bothered by the many shifts between fantasy and reality, as this is what the theater and movies are all about. The many points at which things seem to be heading towards a disaster that never comes reminded me of dialogue from Shakespeare in Love--

HENSLOWE

"Mr. Fennyman, let me explain about the theatre business The natural condition is one of unsurmountable
obstacles on the road to imminent disaster...."

FENNYMAN
So what do we do ?

HENSLOWE
Nothing. Strangely enough, it all turns out well."… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

tonysopranozDec 23, 2014

this movie has very unlikeable, stupid, weird, creepy, annoying, depressing, and pretentious characters. this was probably intentional, but it makes watching the movie difficult because its very uncomfortable. you will want to punch everythis movie has very unlikeable, stupid, weird, creepy, annoying, depressing, and pretentious characters. this was probably intentional, but it makes watching the movie difficult because its very uncomfortable. you will want to punch every main character in the face because they deserve it. sometimes its hard to tell if the movie is encouraging this kind of terrible behaviour, or if it is just doing these characters very well as a way of satirizing it. if it is taken satirically, the movie goes down a lot smoother, but sometimes it seems like the movie actually wants you to take these characters seriously, which is very frustrating because they are all idiots....

however, somehow, the movie feels high quality and made me think. it wasn't a very comfortable or enjoyable experience, but it did get my mind working in ways it normally doesn't work, which was nice. so i give it a 6/10.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

2

lauranycDec 21, 2014

To see a would-be artist suffer, be consumed by her art while producing a masterpiece, go watch Black Swan. To be dragged along on every drinking binge you've had with your suffering, drunk, artist friends who hang on too long to the dreamTo see a would-be artist suffer, be consumed by her art while producing a masterpiece, go watch Black Swan. To be dragged along on every drinking binge you've had with your suffering, drunk, artist friends who hang on too long to the dream only to be destroyed by it, go see Birdman. Good acting, interesting direction, terrible script. Boring after 20 minutes.… Expand

11 of 16 users found this helpful115

All this user's reviews

10

OpinionatedGuyDec 20, 2014

I swear if this movie is not nominated for Best Picture in the Oscars, I am going to kill myself.

Watching Birdman is like riding a great two hour long roller coaster. It goes up when an intense scene goes on and it goes down whenI swear if this movie is not nominated for Best Picture in the Oscars, I am going to kill myself.

Watching Birdman is like riding a great two hour long roller coaster. It goes up when an intense scene goes on and it goes down when everything seems fine and then it goes up again when it’s intense and so on.

Birdman feels like it’s a semi-autobiography movie for Michael Keaton. I did not see his other movies including his run as Batman but his performance in this movie alone is enough for me to agree that he is one of the most underrated actors in Hollywood. I do hope this movie gives him more roles to do in the future now he received tons of critical acclaim on his performance.

I like how Michael Keaton did not overshadow the other cast in the movie because the cast performance is brilliant. It seemed like they’re real people in this movie. My favorite performers in this movie besides Michael Keaton were Edward Norton and Emma Stone. They both had their great moments in this movie.

The movie’s plot relies on character development and they did a good job doing that. The movie’s plot also relies on social commentary about Hollywood which they were on point about it especially about “washed up” actors trying to be relevant again as well as the “snobby critics” which was my favorite scene in the entire movie.

I don’t usually comment on musical scores in this movie but I cannot ignore the score in this movie because it was really good. The use of the drums in this movie as a score is perfectly used considering the intense tone of the movie.

The direction from Alejandro González Iñárritu in this movie is amazing. Not to forget that this movie excel the “shot in one take” style of filming very well. It feels like they really shot the movie in one take thanks to clever editing skills.

Birdman could be an Oscar winner next year thanks to its brilliant cast performance especially from Michael Keaton, Edward Norton and Emma Stone as well as great character development, on-point social commentary about Hollywood, really good musical score, amazing direction from Alejandro González Iñárritu and its well-done “shot in one take” filming style.

Birdman is easily not only one of my favorite movies of 2014 but as well as one of my favorite movies of all-time.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

petrocsDec 17, 2014

There are films you experience and there are films you view. Do you know the difference? A film you experience is one that you become completely immersed, that you lose yourself to the world in which you are subjected to. Experiences likeThere are films you experience and there are films you view. Do you know the difference? A film you experience is one that you become completely immersed, that you lose yourself to the world in which you are subjected to. Experiences like Birdman do not come along everyday. Director Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu opens his film with his main character hovering, weightless, in his underwear, deciphering the current state of his life. It's the only time the camera, and the audience, are given a reprieve in the film, as it is shot completely in long takes. It's a movie in name, but a test of endurance for your mind. So come along with me now and enjoy the tale of the Birdman.
Riggan Thomson (Michael Keaton) is a washed-up Hollywood actor looking to reinvent his career. Thomson is best known for his role as the Birdman, a successful superhero franchise that skyrocketed the actor to worldwide popularity. After leaving the franchise after three mega hits, Thomson found that replicating the success for his Birdman persona was a lot easier said than done. Spending the next twenty years wallowing in mediocrity takes a toll on a man, and Riggan Thomson is ready for a change. The actor decides the best way to do this is by writing, directing, and starring in a play, an adaptation of Raymond Carver's short story "What We Talk About When We Talk About Love".
Knowing the challenge ahead of him, Thomson enlists the help of his best friend/lawyer Jake (Zack Galifianakis) to produce the film and his daughter Sam (Emma Stone), a recovering drug addict, to serve as his assistant. The cast is made up of Riggan's girlfriend Laura (Andrea Riseborough), first-time-Broadway-actress Lesley (Naomi Watts), and Mike (Edward Norton), Lesley's troubled boyfriend. With the show about to open, Riggan begins to hear the voice of his alter ego, Birdman, berating him for the life choices he's made. Experiencing these bouts also leads to fits of anger which are depicted in Riggan's mind by the way of telekinesis and levitation.
After the first of a series of preview nights for the play, Riggan reads some early reviews and becomes enraged that Mike has stolen the spotlight. Riggan desperate to be relevant again, begins to spiral into an emotionally conflicted state which pits him against the people he loves and the success of the play. A man who has spent the majority of his life searching for answers to how to sustain his relevance is now faced with the harsh realities that he, like the rest of the world, do not matter. The time may have arrived to accept the truths about his current state of being and learn to adapt, but can Riggan dismiss his need for acceptance?
Birdman is an astonishing technical film from start to finish. Emmanuel Lubezki's camera work is phenomenal and the transition from scene to scene is magically edited to appear as one long take. Iñárritu (21 Grams) navigates this extremely ambitious film with spectacular skill and creates not only a technically beautiful film, but a movie that's intimate and emotional at it's core. Michael Keaton is absolutely astonishing as Riggan Thomson. The characters mental roller coaster allows Keaton to explore his characters emotional core and he succeeds in his portrayal with an Oscar worthy performance. Edward Norton is fantastic as the arrogant Broadway lifer. An actor known for his difficulties on sets feel right at home in this role. Naomi Watts and Zach Galifianakis are truly delightful as well but it is Emma Stone who steals the show. Stone's character represents hope to Keaton's Riggan and the two are magical together.

Overall, Birdman is a movie that is ambitious and thought-provoking which will delight film goers who search a movie with style and substance. We will definitely be hearing from this movie come award season.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

DedBraneMikeDec 16, 2014

A fascinating experiment to say the least. It's good to see a film that tries to tell a story in a different way. Despite some scenes not working very well at all (which is expected for a movie faked to look like one long take). Other thanA fascinating experiment to say the least. It's good to see a film that tries to tell a story in a different way. Despite some scenes not working very well at all (which is expected for a movie faked to look like one long take). Other than that, it's a very good little movie worthy of your time.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

netflicDec 14, 2014

This movie is about an actor who used to be famous playing an iconic super-hero and now, many years after, is trying to prove himself as an actor, a director, a father, etc. All the action happens inside a small and worn-out Broadway theater.This movie is about an actor who used to be famous playing an iconic super-hero and now, many years after, is trying to prove himself as an actor, a director, a father, etc. All the action happens inside a small and worn-out Broadway theater.
The movie is stylish, it is trendy, I would say, sexy and jazzy but black comedy is definitely not my genre.
Great performances, sound track and cinematography. But overall, too crazy for me. Critics love this movie. I guess they think schizophrenia is a good thing...… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

4

CalimackDec 12, 2014

What a badly paced and ill-conceived "black" comedy. Movie was too long and full of pretentious bits of "knowledge" that were "dropped" on our heads. Rather watch Todd Solondz films that don't take themselves seriously, the first step inWhat a badly paced and ill-conceived "black" comedy. Movie was too long and full of pretentious bits of "knowledge" that were "dropped" on our heads. Rather watch Todd Solondz films that don't take themselves seriously, the first step in actually being a "comedy."

Don't buy into the Oscar hype machine on this. This movie will be forgotten much like Michael Keaton's career.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

9

monica424Dec 12, 2014

Birdman is an amazing film and i watched it in the cinema. When the blu-ray will come? Hope to watch blu-ray version by my Aurora blu-ray player. Now it is on Christmas sale season.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

3

clivelipsettDec 10, 2014

Fun central idea about a theater production takes an off-kilter approach to conventional character foibles, cliche relationships and stereotypes. It's all familiar except for the stylistic way it's put together. The magical realism theme isFun central idea about a theater production takes an off-kilter approach to conventional character foibles, cliche relationships and stereotypes. It's all familiar except for the stylistic way it's put together. The magical realism theme is kept barely alive just to have a fanciful set-piece in the third act which doesn't add any depth. The contrast of an Ex-Blockbuster Superhero actor clawing his way back to Broadway Stage legitimacy is occasionally rewarding in a handful of scenes spaced between too many predictable ones.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

5

BshopDec 7, 2014

Hard to watch. Maybe I'm not as entertained by theater, but this movie seemed to blend the fantasy with reality.
Keaton plays a mixed up character, with a host of equally messed up family/co-stars on the stage.
In the end, some surprises IHard to watch. Maybe I'm not as entertained by theater, but this movie seemed to blend the fantasy with reality.
Keaton plays a mixed up character, with a host of equally messed up family/co-stars on the stage.
In the end, some surprises I was not expecting, but kinda hard to watch and stay entertained.
Then again, I've never really like "theater-type" productions, so maybe a little biased.
In summary, see it if you like theater or the draw of "Broadway" production. Otherwise, wait for the rental to see it, if at all.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

gfnyDec 5, 2014

A most unusual movie with unique camera techniques. Michael Keaton and Edward Norton do a superb acting job. I enjoyed the movie though I am at a loss to completely understand it. The critics rating have it just about right. If you are aA most unusual movie with unique camera techniques. Michael Keaton and Edward Norton do a superb acting job. I enjoyed the movie though I am at a loss to completely understand it. The critics rating have it just about right. If you are a New Yorker give it an extra star.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

IndiefilmloverDec 2, 2014

In this day and age, it is rare to see a film that doesn't look like it was shaped from a cookie cutter. "Birdman" is a breath of fresh air, much in the same way as "Being John Malkovich" and "Her" were when they came out. From the firstIn this day and age, it is rare to see a film that doesn't look like it was shaped from a cookie cutter. "Birdman" is a breath of fresh air, much in the same way as "Being John Malkovich" and "Her" were when they came out. From the first scene until the last, "Birdman" moves in unexpected ways. Like any film, you can nitpick here and there, but I'll take a film that takes chances like this over 90% of the mediocrity that Hollywood spews out every year. The cast is first rate. A lot has been said about the performances of Michael Keaton, Edward Norton and Emma Stone in the film, but Naomi Watts is also very good. I don't understand why she isn't getting the same Oscar buzz as the other three cast members. Alejandro González Iñárritu has done it again.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

FilmGuy619Nov 30, 2014

Birdman is not just a reminder of why we watch movies, but it serves as a reminder of why some of us want to make them. Filmmakers always look to try and reinvent the wheel and that is certainly what film does. Not only that, but it managesBirdman is not just a reminder of why we watch movies, but it serves as a reminder of why some of us want to make them. Filmmakers always look to try and reinvent the wheel and that is certainly what film does. Not only that, but it manages to showcase quite a bit of social commentary, as it deals with Hollywood, franchises, social media, and even LA vs NY.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

5

ExistentialmanNov 26, 2014

While the film is interesting throughout, in end the whole is considerably less than the sum of the parts. I was never bored, but my feelings about all of the characters, with no exceptions, were left unresolved. I wanted more and I wasWhile the film is interesting throughout, in end the whole is considerably less than the sum of the parts. I was never bored, but my feelings about all of the characters, with no exceptions, were left unresolved. I wanted more and I was left feeling that the ending was really a cop-out, given the complexity of everything that led up to it. I'm trying avoid spoilers here. The ending was foreshadowed so often and in so many ways that when it finally happens my reaction was, "So what?" While all great films foreshadow the conclusion in one way or another, the best films surprise you as well. This one didn't so I was left feeling empty. The filmmaking technique is great, but the conclusion of the story needed to be a lot better to justify the "one continuous take" style employed here.… Expand

1 of 15 users found this helpful114

All this user's reviews

5

Eilidh2Nov 21, 2014

An over-long and annoying exercise in (sort of) magical realism. Michael Keaton is fine in the title role and goes a long way towards redeeming the project. But Edward Norton and Emma Stone's aggravatingly over-the-top performances areAn over-long and annoying exercise in (sort of) magical realism. Michael Keaton is fine in the title role and goes a long way towards redeeming the project. But Edward Norton and Emma Stone's aggravatingly over-the-top performances are exhausting to watch. The conceit of the 'single take' is claustrophic and ultimately pointless.

I had been looking forward to this one. Very disappointing.… Expand

8 of 10 users found this helpful82

All this user's reviews

4

argaliteNov 21, 2014

What a piece of crap. The characters are miserable losers that you do not want to know. It gets good reviews because it is about critics and actors. Lame and stupid, with no redeeming qualities.

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

1

amboyNov 20, 2014

This is a mixture of backstage comedy and science fiction; they don't mix. All About Eve and Batman must forever remain strangers. The result is a miserable hash that has nothing to say about creativity, fantasy, or indeed anything else.This is a mixture of backstage comedy and science fiction; they don't mix. All About Eve and Batman must forever remain strangers. The result is a miserable hash that has nothing to say about creativity, fantasy, or indeed anything else. The cast tends to mumble, and that may be a mercy. Profoundly awful.… Expand

12 of 21 users found this helpful129

All this user's reviews

9

KristianBKNov 20, 2014

A very, very good film by Inarritu. Masterful execution of the one-shot technique, brilliant and definitely one of the best screenplays of this year, great performances, one of the funniest films of the year, and time only flies whileA very, very good film by Inarritu. Masterful execution of the one-shot technique, brilliant and definitely one of the best screenplays of this year, great performances, one of the funniest films of the year, and time only flies while watching it. It flies so damn fast, that the movie feel much too short. Behind the masterful overall execution of the film and the main story, there is a somehow tragic story about an actor, who doesn't find his place on the world and starts to wonder, if he really matters on this world. A film that shows the true side of the entertainment business as well as it shows the "bad" side of being an actor. Not typical performances from Keaton, Norton and Galifianakis, but they fit in very well. A weird, genius, and awesome film.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

sebastianglzNov 18, 2014

My expectations of this movie were really high after I read the amazing reviews. It's cool, but not to cool enough. Something in the story is missing, but González Iñárritu's direction is amazing, so its the cinematography by EmmanuelMy expectations of this movie were really high after I read the amazing reviews. It's cool, but not to cool enough. Something in the story is missing, but González Iñárritu's direction is amazing, so its the cinematography by Emmanuel Lubezki. Maybe another Mexican year at the Oscars®.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

MovieGuysNov 17, 2014

After seeing an amazing film like Birdman, one has the urge to reevaluate his own life. Only the most powerful, prestigious pictures can make that happen, and add Birdman to that list. Everything from the amazing acting to the superbAfter seeing an amazing film like Birdman, one has the urge to reevaluate his own life. Only the most powerful, prestigious pictures can make that happen, and add Birdman to that list. Everything from the amazing acting to the superb cinematography (which never lets a scene cut , but rather fade into the net one) is achieved with grace authenticity. Director Alejandro G. Iñárritu (21 Grams, Amores Perros) has made some pretty great films, and this definitely goes in his top three. Needless to say, Oscars will be a-comin' to this one.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

10

ahasaNov 17, 2014

Birdman is a revelation in terms of how a movie is a spectacle and what a movie (as a definition) stands for. From the power house acting to the masterclass direction along with its brilliant script. This is probably the best film this year,Birdman is a revelation in terms of how a movie is a spectacle and what a movie (as a definition) stands for. From the power house acting to the masterclass direction along with its brilliant script. This is probably the best film this year, and Micheal Keaton definitely gives an astounding and phenomenal performance, along with Alejandro González Iñárritu's inescapable direction which consists of very long takes and seems like the movie is done in one big shot. Brilliant, extraordinary and stunning… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

gwamNov 17, 2014

Wonderful movie exploring a less visual poetic style! Every dialog is epic and intense. Characters are intriguing and unique in their ways. The constant drum background sets tone for intense dialogs and action sequences, music is wonderful inWonderful movie exploring a less visual poetic style! Every dialog is epic and intense. Characters are intriguing and unique in their ways. The constant drum background sets tone for intense dialogs and action sequences, music is wonderful in general. The end sequence can be a bit misleading nonetheless significant and poignant. By far my favorite Iñárritu!… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

10

PsychefanNov 17, 2014

The Ascent into Madness: Birdman is a truly creative, amazing movie for many reasons including the acting, script and cinematography. I'd like to focus on the portrayal, through the script and Michael Keaton's outstanding performance, ofThe Ascent into Madness: Birdman is a truly creative, amazing movie for many reasons including the acting, script and cinematography. I'd like to focus on the portrayal, through the script and Michael Keaton's outstanding performance, of the lead character's "ascent" into madness as he becomes more like the Birdman. As a mental health professional, I would recommend this movie to all others in the field and anyone interested in mental health. Although the movie is about an actor searching for meaning, validity and understanding in life, these are universal issues which most people seek answers to. Whether or not we are successful in reconciling these issues in our own minds goes a long way in determining our psychological balance.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

3

NeilG1217Nov 16, 2014

Hollywood has a long and hostile tradition of mocking theater, and this movie is part of that tradition. We are supposed to both care about, and laugh at, Keaton's character's attempts to go from Hollywood to Broadway. However, the tensionHollywood has a long and hostile tradition of mocking theater, and this movie is part of that tradition. We are supposed to both care about, and laugh at, Keaton's character's attempts to go from Hollywood to Broadway. However, the tension and the humor are both based on something that resembles mental illness but is passed off as magical realism, which felt out of place. While there are things to like, mixing all these elements and more made the movie feel confusing, and undermined both the tension and humor for me.… Expand

14 of 20 users found this helpful146

All this user's reviews

1

rbmccawNov 15, 2014

Read the NY Observer review before wasting your money on this "miserable load of deranged, deluded crap masquerading as a black comedy." This is really an awful movie. I nearly walked out after the first half hour and was ultimately sorryRead the NY Observer review before wasting your money on this "miserable load of deranged, deluded crap masquerading as a black comedy." This is really an awful movie. I nearly walked out after the first half hour and was ultimately sorry that I didn't.… Expand

29 of 52 users found this helpful2923

All this user's reviews

1

killingspreeNov 15, 2014

I don't understand why this has so many good critical reviews. It's boring, pointless, and the shaky super tight camera work is obnoxious. The first 3/4 of the movie doesn't even matter because there's no plot.

22 of 44 users found this helpful2222

All this user's reviews

9

BrianMcCriticNov 15, 2014

A film shot in such an unconvientional way mixed with great performances by Keaton and Norton demands to be seen. Birdman shines a light on celebraties and their status and how important it is to be remembered. A

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

1

DOUGKNov 14, 2014

In spite of having good actors, this movie is a waste of time. Terrible story, including the use of terrible Raymond Carver book as basis for the play. Nothing about it makes sense or makes you want to watch it.

9 of 25 users found this helpful916

All this user's reviews

10

CriticAlmightyNov 10, 2014

Not only was the single camera-shot technique brilliantly executed, we are treated to a front row seat to witness the paranoid and insecure perspective of the film's main character, Riggan Thompson. The dialog was masterful and and theNot only was the single camera-shot technique brilliantly executed, we are treated to a front row seat to witness the paranoid and insecure perspective of the film's main character, Riggan Thompson. The dialog was masterful and and the performances had me believing I, too, was paranoid and insecure. Kudos to director Alejandro González Iñárritu and his financial backers for taking such a bold risk, something largely absent in Hollywood. And any film that questions the credibility and relevance of critics get extra points. GO SEE!… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

JamesLNov 9, 2014

I have seen everyone of the director's films and this just does not live up to the hype. The acting is great but I cannot tell you why it is so highly rate or what the point of the film was. The obvious point was for Keaton be a successfulI have seen everyone of the director's films and this just does not live up to the hype. The acting is great but I cannot tell you why it is so highly rate or what the point of the film was. The obvious point was for Keaton be a successful actor on the stage but there are numerous other currents running through the film. Most of them are left unexplored and the illusory effects of Keaton losing his clarity only come to play near the end.. The film left me speechless because it is so overrated. It is this year's "Inside Llewellyn Davis".… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

8

LynNov 9, 2014

Michael Keaton and Edward Norton are both excellent, and Inarritu has a terrific way of bringing actors' emotions to the forefront (e.g. "21 Grams," so intense I'm not sure I could watch it again). Really enjoyed watching "Birdman," thoughMichael Keaton and Edward Norton are both excellent, and Inarritu has a terrific way of bringing actors' emotions to the forefront (e.g. "21 Grams," so intense I'm not sure I could watch it again). Really enjoyed watching "Birdman," though I'm liking it a little less upon reflection. I guess that when it comes to magical realism, I tend to favor the realism over the magical. Reviews say "dark comedy," but do NOT expect something like "Harold & Maude"! Some of the insights are stirring, but while you may marvel at the film's visuals, you also may puzzle over what it all means. Random note: Really interesting score.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

8

ledaumasNov 8, 2014

This is a movie that's not for everyone. I like what one critic said about the audience needs to be capable of understanding this "cinematic stretch" because a lot of imagination needs to be used to make this story work. It has a greatThis is a movie that's not for everyone. I like what one critic said about the audience needs to be capable of understanding this "cinematic stretch" because a lot of imagination needs to be used to make this story work. It has a great variety of characters who have one goal, have a successful play, but they're having trouble getting along. Along with that, the primary character appears to be having a mental breakdown. The film rings very true until the end. Once I figure out the ending, I'll be able to say I understood the entire movie.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

TotallyEpicHDNov 8, 2014

Although it may be a little weird, Birdman's all-star cast, great storytelling, and original plot places Birdman as one of the best films that we have seen from Fox Searchlight, and put together beautifully by Alejandro González Iñárritu.

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

9

deanableNov 7, 2014

Brilliant all the way around and therefore a very rare American film. Nothing this original has come along since Pulp Fiction.
And like Pulp Fiction every actor who opens their mouth does a great job. The Sag award goes to best ensemble.Brilliant all the way around and therefore a very rare American film. Nothing this original has come along since Pulp Fiction.
And like Pulp Fiction every actor who opens their mouth does a great job. The Sag award goes to best ensemble. This film is the winner.
Inarritu's direction is pure and clean and exciting.
See this film and then see it again… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

Mike_MNov 6, 2014

On second viewing:

The film's technical merits are without exception. Most predominant is that the whole movie feels like one long sequence shot, from about minute 2 until nearly the end. There are disguised cuts, and the movie findsOn second viewing:

The film's technical merits are without exception. Most predominant is
that the whole movie feels like one long sequence shot, from about
minute 2 until nearly the end. There are disguised cuts, and the movie
finds moments to settle down the camera to contrast the movement. But
the orchestration of actors, the re-framing of the camera, and the
support of crew outside the frame, are nothing short of phenomenal.

The film's artistic merits are easy to see in the performances, design
and composition, but harder to puzzle out emotionally/intellectually.
They rely partly on multiple ambiguities, and the audience will need to
do some broad-view thinking about life and art to really crack open the
movie. For all of this, I would not say that the merits are so rarified
that they should push away anyone who wants to see a challenging movie.
They are hard to crack, but not because you really have to understand
all the references.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

moviemitch96Nov 5, 2014

In this genius film, Michael Keaton plays a washed up Broadway actor attempting to make a comeback by putting together a play, risking is sanity in the process. The film managed to surprise and impress me several times. Going in, I had noIn this genius film, Michael Keaton plays a washed up Broadway actor attempting to make a comeback by putting together a play, risking is sanity in the process. The film managed to surprise and impress me several times. Going in, I had no idea it used one take for the majority of the film. However, it worked and looked so well. The cinematography and sharp dialogue were only a couple of things that made this film so great. The main highlight was easily the acting. Every single actor in the film does a superb job! Michael Keaton, without a doubt, deserves an Oscar for this one! Edward Norton also deserves a best supporting actor nod for his performance. The other supporting actors that included the likes of Emma Stone, Zach Galifianakis, Andrea Riseborough, Amy Ryan, and Naomi Watts also did amazing. Overall, it's easily one of the best films I've seen all year!… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

TVJerryNov 4, 2014

Michael Keaton plays an actor who's struggling to mount his Broadway debut. In addition to the challenges of the show and confrontations with his family, he's in constant conflict with the shadow of the superhero that made him a star. AsMichael Keaton plays an actor who's struggling to mount his Broadway debut. In addition to the challenges of the show and confrontations with his family, he's in constant conflict with the shadow of the superhero that made him a star. As expected, Keaton is outstanding, but the rest of the cast turns in rich and nuanced performances (Emma Stone is a revelation). What makes this film so brilliant is director Alejandro González Iñárritu's inspired vision. It's shot as one continuous take, which is not only a tech challenge, but creates a sense of fluid time and continuous stress. A slightly surreal, constantly compelling and richly realized combination of personal drama and theatrical send-up.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

9

jorgenricNov 2, 2014

Well acted, technically spot on, engaging and demands a conversation afterward. If you can't handle a little bit of weird in your cinema, look elsewhere, otherwise make sure to see it.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

Compi24Nov 2, 2014

In a glorious mish-mash that results in a kind of "American Beauty" retelling mixed with elements of "Synecdoche New York," Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu's masterfully shot and edited masterpiece "Birdman" sprawls across every color on theIn a glorious mish-mash that results in a kind of "American Beauty" retelling mixed with elements of "Synecdoche New York," Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu's masterfully shot and edited masterpiece "Birdman" sprawls across every color on the spectrum of human emotion and absolutely wows with a career-changing performance from Michael Keaton.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

9

Grill3dCh33zNov 2, 2014

Birdman is a washed up actor's struggle with, what we think as, schizophrenia. It really portrays in a clear and concise way, how actors are always falling in and out of the spotlight. With 10 out of 10 performances by Ed Norton, Emma Stone,Birdman is a washed up actor's struggle with, what we think as, schizophrenia. It really portrays in a clear and concise way, how actors are always falling in and out of the spotlight. With 10 out of 10 performances by Ed Norton, Emma Stone, and Michael Keaton, as well as the amazing head rush you get whilst watching this movie, it is a must-see. From it's black comedy, to it's choppy drum score courtesy of Antonio Sanchez, this movie really made me think.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

8

AxgrinderNov 2, 2014

An industry insider’s movie. Heavy on the Freud. If you like it, it’s probably something you’ll want to watch twice just to make sure you didn’t miss anything. Michael Keaton plays Riggan Thomson, a former movie star who is best known forAn industry insider’s movie. Heavy on the Freud. If you like it, it’s probably something you’ll want to watch twice just to make sure you didn’t miss anything. Michael Keaton plays Riggan Thomson, a former movie star who is best known for his role as comic book superhero Birdman. Riggan walked away from the role many years ago and is tormented by his decision. No longer of interest to anyone in Hollywood, Riggan writes, directs and stars in his own Broadway play in an effort to stay relevant and prove (mostly to himself) that his success as Birdman was not a fluke, and that he has real acting talent.

By all appearances, Riggan is well beyond the zenith of his career. His desire to be an actor in the limelight has cost him dearly over the years in terms of his relationship with daughter (Emma Stone), his ex-wife (Amy Ryan) and his current girlfriend (Andrea Riseborough). Possibly due to his lack of subsequent success, Birdman has become Riggan’s alter ego and his sense of reality is becoming increasing warped. The movie seems to be asking questions like: What kind of person seeks a career in acting? Do actors start out as insecure egomaniacs incapable of real intimacy and emotion or is there a real danger that years of trying to make it as an actor will make you this way? Or is film is poking fun (tongue in beak) at the public’s hackneyed perception of actors and acting. Hmmm? Overall it’s just enjoyable, not stunning or profound.

The story is told mostly from inside the head of Keaton, but deftly moves around to show you the chaos and insecurity enveloping lives of everyone associated with acting or the stage. Reminiscent of Bob Fosse’s 1979 musical All That Jazz. Extremely well-acted by everyone involved. Expect several Oscar nominations for this one, including best actor for Keaton and best actor in a supporting role for Edward Norton, who is absolutely hilarious. Nice change of pace performances from both Emma Stone and Zach Galfianikis. The cinematography is also excellent.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

7

MCSNov 2, 2014

Though I do understand the brilliance of the script, cinema, and acting, I choose not to reiterate the praise for Birdman. Instead, I prefer to give fair warning to movie goers that this is not a universally enjoyed movie. It is clearly aThough I do understand the brilliance of the script, cinema, and acting, I choose not to reiterate the praise for Birdman. Instead, I prefer to give fair warning to movie goers that this is not a universally enjoyed movie. It is clearly a movie for the industry of the arts, whether it is literature, film, music, dance, drama, and much of the joy from the movie is in sharing that perspective with the characters, whether it is the drama of backstage Broadway, literary references by the street characters, or watching and listening to the hum of NYC perched on a gritty roof top sign. Much of the drama and comedy will be lost on average movie goers, and the irritating jazz drum beat, disturbing voice in Keaton's head, and occasional physical tantrums will drive some to distraction. While I enjoyed this movie, laughed at and with its characters, and appreciated all of the incredible performances, especially of Stone, Watts and Norton, I'm fairly certain that many will have expected to see something more formulaic and might leave the film scratching their heads or crawling the walls.

The film reminds me of The Dresser, a fine film and extraordinary performance by Albert Finney, but one that also shares an uncomfortable story line of a back stage drama. See the movie, but discard your expectations and don't expect to relax.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

5

analogkid280Nov 2, 2014

I left the theater not really knowing if I liked this movie or not. I still do not even know. I might have to think about it some more. One thing I did like is seeking Keaton! I miss the days when he was an A list actor. Now we just have thisI left the theater not really knowing if I liked this movie or not. I still do not even know. I might have to think about it some more. One thing I did like is seeking Keaton! I miss the days when he was an A list actor. Now we just have this semi-parody of a fictional version of him. The long shots were cool. The annoying pressure building non stop drama was not cool. Dang, I almost thought I liked this movie for a minute.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

8

CMCNov 1, 2014

As is usual, highly stylistic films like this will draw a range of reactions. I got off to a slow start because I think too much style usually gets in the way and is considered sufficient; flowy kinetic tracking shots accompanied by surrealAs is usual, highly stylistic films like this will draw a range of reactions. I got off to a slow start because I think too much style usually gets in the way and is considered sufficient; flowy kinetic tracking shots accompanied by surreal time changes and aggressive sound design. However, the story takes enough turns and the acting is mostly excellent. As the film progressed, I increasingly enjoyed being along for the ride. In its terms, it was mostly successful. In fairness, it is hard to reach the highest levels of profundity in black comedy, but it is certainly possible to be more edgy or more dark. I think the film is unique and worth seeing.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

2

GreatMartinOct 31, 2014

Without fail 1-2 times a year I get suckered in by a PR campaign and this year it is “Birdman The Unexpected Virtue Of Ignorance” being the full title but being known as “Birdman”. The film is being herald as a movie making technical feat,Without fail 1-2 times a year I get suckered in by a PR campaign and this year it is “Birdman The Unexpected Virtue Of Ignorance” being the full title but being known as “Birdman”. The film is being herald as a movie making technical feat, acting at its best, plus definite Oscar nominations for Michael Keaton and Edward Norton in some of the lesser media oversell. I bought in to it!

Keaton is a one time movie star who became famous playing the superhero Birdman who decides to come to Broadway in a play he has written, is producing, directing and is starring in for a comeback. Playing opposite is another film star (Naomi Watts) making her Broadway debut and Mike Shiner (Norton) a method actor who believes you use a real gun in a scene when he is going to be shot and drinking real gin on stage. Also involved is Laura (Andrea Riseborough), Keaton’s sometime lover, his daughter Sam, (Emma Stone) just recently out of rehab being her Dad’s assistant, his ex-wife Sylvia (Amy Ryan) and his attorney Zach Galifianakis.

It has been described as a comedy/drama, a first rate back stage story but regarding the former I laughed once and as far as the latter comes nowhere near “All About Eve”. There is one scene far fetched scene where The New York Times fictional critic, played by Lindsay Duncan, tells Keaton she will destroy his play, and him, for having the nerve to come to Broadway for his comeback.

Yes Keaton does a good job with what has to work with, Norton has some good moments but it is Emma Stone who makes the strongest impression.

Director Alejandro G. Inarritu, who co-wrote the film with Nicolas Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris and Armando Bo, also produced it. His gimmick, working with his cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki, making it seem like the movie, even though taking place over a few days, was filmed in one continuous take and is very successful at it. The music, mainly drumming by Antonio Sanchez, at times is affecting but most of the time annoying.

I may wind up in the minority, and Keaton and Norton may get the Oscar nominations that are being talked about, but as a comedy or a drama or a satire “Birdman” doesn’t rate a worth seeing from me.… Expand

10 of 24 users found this helpful1014

All this user's reviews

9

kevtheobaldOct 31, 2014

If you like Black Swan or Fight Club, there is a good chance you will like Birdman. The cast is talented and delivers some great performances. The camera work is impressive. The pacing can be little slow in parts. It is not your standardIf you like Black Swan or Fight Club, there is a good chance you will like Birdman. The cast is talented and delivers some great performances. The camera work is impressive. The pacing can be little slow in parts. It is not your standard blockbuster style film. It is a nice break from those cookie cutter style films. If you are expecting a super hero flick, this is nothing of the sort. If you want a drama with good writing, good acting, and not just the same old story, this is a great choice.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

Ianita88Oct 28, 2014

I just love this film its all about entretenimient , simply fun , you just know when 120 mins fells like 15 mins.At léast I see 3 Oscars awards for sure (Best Leading Actor , Best Support Actor & Sound )

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

8

JUIKEROct 28, 2014

Rex Reed "seems to have aged 40 years" since the last time he gave a relevant film review. The only guy in the world who hated Inception. I bet this is great.

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

9

JoshFriesenOct 27, 2014

The must-see spectacle of 2013 was Alfonso Curron’s technically brilliant Gravity, widely praised for its innovative use of the long take. This year’s Birdman, made by fellow Mexican director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, seeks to one-up theThe must-see spectacle of 2013 was Alfonso Curron’s technically brilliant Gravity, widely praised for its innovative use of the long take. This year’s Birdman, made by fellow Mexican director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, seeks to one-up the long takes of Gravity by seemingly having one continuous shot.

It isn’t a single take but that in no way diminishes the superb camera work. Instead of cutting between characters the camera glides to them, taking on a life of its own at times. The disembodied camera floating down hall ways and stairs feels both surreal and exhilarating when paired with the upbeat jazz score. The behind the scenes of a theatre production have never been more thrilling. Birdman is a bold technical exercise and instead of the B-movie that Gravity was under the surface, Birdman has soul.

Michael Keaton plays Riggan, a washed up ex-Hollywood Superhero who is attempting to restart his career by staging and staring in a Broadway play. However, Riggan hasn’t left the past behind and the Birdman character that made him famous still plagues his thoughts. He is a man divided, in Freudian terms his psyche is split. Part of him longs for the glory days of Birdman while part of him wants to prove critics wrong, showing them he is more than just a celebrity.

The internal turmoil of his life mirrors the external chaos of his stage play. In an act of fate, a falling camera takes out the sole incompetent actor working for him who is replaced by the talented and egotistical Mike Shiner (Edward Norton on top form). At first Mike appears to be a god-send but quickly becomes another obstacle for Riggan. Besides stealing the spotlight in the play, Mike also develops an interest for Riggan’s daughter (Emma Stone) who is fresh out of rehab and has clear daddy-issues. One of the female leads in the play claims to be pregnant with Riggan’s child. Stuffed to the brim with dramatic tensions, Birdman is reminiscent of the high-speed comedy dramas of Howard Hawks.

Birdman is the first of two mainstream Hollywood satires this year, the second being David Cronenberg’s Maps to the Stars. Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu (who also wrote the screenplay) fires shot after shot at the self-obsessed culture of Hollywood. This culture which at least in myth was one confined to the California hills, has now transcended Tinsletown with the dawn of the internet. Now with Facebook and Twitter everyone is just a video post away from fame and, as Edward Norton reminds us after his massive on-stage erection goes viral; there is no such thing as bad press.

If there is a criticism of Birdman, it’s how ambitious the film is. Alejandro seemingly throws all his ideas at us and the film moves at such a brisk pace that they all can’t be absorbed in a single viewing. A more restrained approach, focusing on fewer topics but in more detail instead of attempting to take on all of celebrity culture in 119 minutes may have better served the film. However, despite the chaos, the film still works, thanks in no small part to the outstanding performances in the leading and supporting roles.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)

User Reviews