Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)

7

ZChongMay 27, 2015

I like this movie, but I will say Whiplash was robbed. Michael Keaton, Ed Norton and Emma Stone were really good in their performances. Lindsey Duncan (despite seeing her in other performances) really broke out. I enjoyed the plot and theI like this movie, but I will say Whiplash was robbed. Michael Keaton, Ed Norton and Emma Stone were really good in their performances. Lindsey Duncan (despite seeing her in other performances) really broke out. I enjoyed the plot and the "confusing" ending. Well done, but not best picture.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

AwesomeRaiderMay 13, 2015

Birdman is a good joke about the Superhero movie and actors who live only in a one character.
Its enjoyable and smart in many moments
Great actuations of Keaton ,Norton and Stone. It is not to Taken seriously, if you like the commercialBirdman is a good joke about the Superhero movie and actors who live only in a one character.
Its enjoyable and smart in many moments
Great actuations of Keaton ,Norton and Stone.

It is not to Taken seriously, if you like the commercial films.
Just only Relax!!!

Birdman es una buena burla acerca de las películas de Superheroes y de los actores que solo viven de un papel o personaje
Es disfrutable e inteligente en varios momentos.
Grandes actuaciones de Keaton,Norton y Stone.

No es para tomársela en serio, si te gusta el cine comercial.
Solo relájate!!!!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

fernandodlcMay 12, 2015

Great performances but one of the most pretentious storylines in years. Really not particularly funny and based around an actor trying to put on his own vanity stage play. If you work in the theater or are an aspiring actor I'm sure this isGreat performances but one of the most pretentious storylines in years. Really not particularly funny and based around an actor trying to put on his own vanity stage play. If you work in the theater or are an aspiring actor I'm sure this is great but for everyone else this it is a boring and unrelatable film… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Jackson861May 2, 2015

Great plot, great visuals and the fantastic acting make this one of the most interesting films of 2014. It's a wildly fun film to watch and is only made better by the fact that Micheal Keaton played Batman in the late 80s and It'sGreat plot, great visuals and the fantastic acting make this one of the most interesting films of 2014. It's a wildly fun film to watch and is only made better by the fact that Micheal Keaton played Batman in the late 80s and It's underwhelming sequel in the 90s. The interesting camera work that makes this film look like it was all filmed in one shot is a unique idea, however, it seems a bit too gimmicky and even then they cheated by transitioning between days by pointing the camera at the sky.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

heromoderApr 21, 2015

Very weird and very funny. Some strong performances from Emma Stone and Edward Norton elevate this clever film even more. Perfect casting choice regarding Michael Keaton (the irony was not lost on any of us).

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

LordOfTheFilmsApr 19, 2015

In my opinion the best movie of the year. Not just because of a well written screenplay and extraordinary acting, but because the cinematography could keep any audience at the edge of their seat even in a very simple story. A personalIn my opinion the best movie of the year. Not just because of a well written screenplay and extraordinary acting, but because the cinematography could keep any audience at the edge of their seat even in a very simple story. A personal favorite from 2014, and an example of originality in a business which becomes less original for every decade.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

MetaVinceApr 18, 2015

Wow, won best movie because the Oscars refused to give American Sniper its due. This movie was just not good. Don't see Iñárritu's Babel or Biutiful, either. Overrated, just bad. Should have walked out...

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

8

BradySmithApr 18, 2015

Birdman is an energetic, original, and very entertaining movie. There is creativity in spades here. From the clever screenplay and the way it was edited to all look like one take to the vibrant cinematography and outstanding performances,Birdman is an energetic, original, and very entertaining movie. There is creativity in spades here. From the clever screenplay and the way it was edited to all look like one take to the vibrant cinematography and outstanding performances, this may very well be many movie buffs' dream film. Keaton, Stone, and Norton all give great, perhaps career best performances. It's absolutely crazy but it's also very buzzy and the characters are all extremely well written. It's one of the best movies of 2014, but it does lack a certain lasting resonance. I had to drop it to an 8 from a 9 because of this. It just isn't quite as good a movie as American Hustle or Her, or in my own opinion which I know is in the minority, Interstellar. But if you're looking for something different, fun, funny, and sometimes emotional, go for Birdman without hesitation.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

CherryxldApr 11, 2015

Birdman es una película que resulta ser satisfactoria en practicamente todos los aspectos de este film.

Esta película resulta un intrépido largometraje que tiene varias características potentes, como la muy buena dirección de AlejandroBirdman es una película que resulta ser satisfactoria en practicamente todos los aspectos de este film.

Esta película resulta un intrépido largometraje que tiene varias características potentes, como la muy buena dirección de Alejandro Gonzales Iñárritu y también la sublime e impresionante fotografía del ganador del Oscar Emmanuel Lubezki, además de sus grandes actuaciones. Así que, por tanto, Birdman es un film que logra abrir sus alas, y también logra volar en lo alto.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

VinceRocks123Apr 10, 2015

A backstage satire of life on broadway and haunting pasts decorated in urbanism, where former celebrities are portrayed as eccentrics who want to see the world as they see, and the people who weigh in against his passion for utter nonsenseA backstage satire of life on broadway and haunting pasts decorated in urbanism, where former celebrities are portrayed as eccentrics who want to see the world as they see, and the people who weigh in against his passion for utter nonsense out of pity Alejandro G Innaritu did a perfect job trying to tell a story of the virtue of the mangled sole searching for a new meaning in life. A modern shakespeare dramedy with a little sentimental thought

Michael Keaton is amazingly alive in a worthy comeback that is one of those transcendental overlooked performances of the decade… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SpangleApr 8, 2015

Birdman is one unique film. A riveting character study from beginning to end, Birdman features many, many positives that make it deserving of the acclaim it received. Firstly, the cinematography is impeccable, as are the editing andBirdman is one unique film. A riveting character study from beginning to end, Birdman features many, many positives that make it deserving of the acclaim it received. Firstly, the cinematography is impeccable, as are the editing and soundtrack. The acting from Michael Keaton, Edward Norton, Naomi Watts, and everyone else, is great. The casting and the way the characters almost match the actors playing them was also an awesome little touch. The direction from Alejandro Gonzalez Innarritu is also very good, as is the writing. Ultimately, Birdman is a tale of a man trying to regain past glory and dealing with his own high expectations for himself. Though, to say I understand this one is far off from the truth. In fact, I found it quite confusing. All the same, Birdman is a great film that really succeeds on the back of its many strong features and touching romantic/familial elements.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

kingofkoopasApr 7, 2015

This movie is one of the worst things I have ever seen. I had fifteen minutes left and I had to turn it off, I just could not leave my brain off any longer. This pile of crap won best picture? This movie is pointless, and extremely boring,This movie is one of the worst things I have ever seen. I had fifteen minutes left and I had to turn it off, I just could not leave my brain off any longer. This pile of crap won best picture? This movie is pointless, and extremely boring, nothing ever happens. What a pretentious pile of ****. I know that there are people in this world who will call something like "Schindler's List" crap. And even though that person is probably a moron, it is still just an awful OPINION. Birdman being a pile of **** is not one of those opinions, it's a FACT. Bandwagon idiots want to feel smart and act like they see something that we cannot, lol. You idiots want to feel smart huh? Well then get me an A on my calculus homework. Or write me my five page essay on J.S. Bach!… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

10

truckproductionApr 6, 2015

Wow! Absolutely incredible filmmaking here. The film perfectly captures the narcissism and obsession that comes with a career in the creative arts. The cinematography was perfection. And every actor and actress in the picture was at the topWow! Absolutely incredible filmmaking here. The film perfectly captures the narcissism and obsession that comes with a career in the creative arts. The cinematography was perfection. And every actor and actress in the picture was at the top of their game. This film will be remembered for decades. Bravo!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Asif-khanApr 2, 2015

A brilliant movie with an even more brilliant cast. Hats off to Edward Norton, perhaps the best thing in the film along with it's unique Cinematography.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

yezoMar 30, 2015

I think most people are going to hate. I personally did not enjoy the movie. The story was quite confusing and probably I am a bit dumb to understand. I admit both Michael Keaton and Edward Norton acted extraordinary well. However, I do notI think most people are going to hate. I personally did not enjoy the movie. The story was quite confusing and probably I am a bit dumb to understand. I admit both Michael Keaton and Edward Norton acted extraordinary well. However, I do not understand why people like how Emma Stone acted in that particular movie. I like Emma in many movie, but in Birdman she did not play a big role and I did not see much acting from it. Overall, I do not like the movie and probably not going to watch it again.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

1

evearcherMar 28, 2015

Wow, all we can say is this film was soooo boring. It takes a long time to get started and yes the whole entire movie is about a theatre play (which in itself is really boring) there are very few interesting moments. Michael Keaton doesWow, all we can say is this film was soooo boring. It takes a long time to get started and yes the whole entire movie is about a theatre play (which in itself is really boring) there are very few interesting moments. Michael Keaton does well with the material but the film is weird in a boring way, it just never goes far enough. Rent it, or just watch the trailer. It is not best picture material at all.....… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

9

ozzsoffyMar 27, 2015

Amazing, must see movie,
from the second it start's you understand that it is something else, after two hours that non stop trip, you are leaving with a very good ending. it need to be an oscar movie and in did it is!!!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Justcool777Mar 26, 2015

'Birdman' or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance-
A Unique layered Storyline following the Character's Life as an undefiningly unkown yet renowned superhero, as a Father, as an Actor, and a Director/Writer who wishes to renew himself into'Birdman' or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance-
A Unique layered Storyline following the Character's Life as an undefiningly unkown yet renowned superhero, as a Father, as an Actor, and a Director/Writer who wishes to renew himself into what he wishes to be.
Birdman composes of great acting and everything what so in it although not a movie that is for everyone.
I would recommend for a one time watch.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

SkulbMar 18, 2015

Some mildly interesting performances raise a forgettable affair from abysmal to mediocre. Some cheap symbolism and some even cheaper pop psychology apparently has critics raving like a flock of seagulls during mating time. Stupid idiot that ISome mildly interesting performances raise a forgettable affair from abysmal to mediocre. Some cheap symbolism and some even cheaper pop psychology apparently has critics raving like a flock of seagulls during mating time. Stupid idiot that I am I assumed that this was because the annual intelligent Hollywood movie had been released. But as it happened all the racket was in aid of a tedious navel gazing exercise of dubious quality. But then it`s always one or the other with Hollywood`s "intellectual" movies apparently.

Someone more intelligent than I, as well as all the people engaged in the production of Birdman, once said that a tragedy displays the misfortunes of man while a comedy displays the misfortunes of the individual. The only funny thing about Birdman then was me and the other silly sods who were fooled into watching it by all the hype. And I suppose the only tragedy was the other silly sods who watched it and liked it because they imagine it to be witty and intelligent. It is neither. Avoid with fingers in ears to drown out the noise and while loudly singing "doodah doodah!" to make doubly sure you don`t get hypnotized by critics into watching it.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

At_chMar 18, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The very same critics that couldn't figure out why they weren't laughing at Gilliam's film "Zero Theorem" now find themselves guffawing at this "Comedy" about a washed up schizophrenic actor on the brink of murdering his co workers and killing himself.
Where I'm from... Suicide is not funny, nor do you gain the adulation of critics by pointing a loaded gun at co workers and then shooting yourself. This is the true theme of the movie... Which isn't funny at all. It's terrifying, and this why this movie is a slap in the face to even the critics who hail it's achievement because if you understand this film... Everyone's ignorance about it is blatantly obvious. This is a movie about a psycho who is teetering on the edge of murder suicide. This psycho (played by Michael Keaton) is further pushed toward his boiling point by ego driven, narcissistic characters who are too self absorbed to realize how terrifyingly close they come to getting their heads blown off by pushing the buttons of a washed up actor who wants to be serious but isn't taken seriously after playing the role of an action hero 20 years prior. After reaching his boiling point in the theater and nearly executing his co workers with a loaded gun... He shoots himself... Misses... And ends up in the hospital where he is extolled for his magnificent achievement in theater... He jumps from a window... Killing himself and further scars his emotionally disturbed daughter who imagines him flying around which portrays the solidification of her psychosis after years of his psychological abuse. The theme of this movie is buried under the pretentiousness of it. AND THAT IS THE POINT. "The unexpected virtue of ignorance" is what this film represents. At first, I didn't understand what the hubbub was about... I was ignorant. Then I realized that it was MY problem because the only thing that caught my attention (ego) was all the pretentious (ego) stroking going on. I almost missed the point entirely. This isn't a comedy... It's a horror flick. It's a film about ignorance or "Bird brains". The lead character played by Keaton is a psycho! He believes he has super powers. He is schizophrenic. He has conversations with himself. Purely nuts... But on the surface this all seems playfully dramatic to the ignorant ego driven viewer, or critic. The other characters are simply cannon fodder for the lead. It was good. I watched it all the way to the end. Perhaps I have yet to understand the significance of the drums throughout the score however... I felt like the score was lacking somewhat in originality. Overall... It was a good movie. I think most audience members, critics, and industry people will fail to see the real theme here.... As usual.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

j3015Mar 17, 2015

Alejandro Gonzalez Innarritu's surreal masterpiece Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) tackles the internal/external conflict of making art. The film revolves around Riggan Thomson (played by an excellent Michael Keaton), a washedAlejandro Gonzalez Innarritu's surreal masterpiece Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) tackles the internal/external conflict of making art. The film revolves around Riggan Thomson (played by an excellent Michael Keaton), a washed up actor who decides to direct, write, and star in his own Broadway adaptation of Raymond Carver's short story "What We Talk About When We Talk About Love". All of Riggan's struggles with his personal life and his ego manifests itself in the days leading up to the play. The film is very self aware and it definitely challenges audiences with its concepts. Those concepts, mind you, are open to interpretation. There's some irony that it won Best Picture and not in a good way. I was actually hoping it wouldn't win because it kind of takes the bite out of the satire.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

rpmMar 16, 2015

I like Keaton as an actor. Magic Realism is a genre I enjoy. I like jazz music. I've only seen one Broadway play (Pippin) and consider it one of the highlights of my life.

That should add up to me really loving this film right? OhI like Keaton as an actor. Magic Realism is a genre I enjoy. I like jazz music. I've only seen one Broadway play (Pippin) and consider it one of the highlights of my life.

That should add up to me really loving this film right?

Oh well...I guess the whole does not equal the sum of its parts in this case.

Keaton mumbles his way through this film, even when on stage in a play (who mumbles line in a play?). The Magic Realism elements are interesting but seem mostly out of place amongst the grunge of backstage Broadway. The jazzy drum soundtrack didn't so much support the film as it distracted from the film. The play within the film was so briefly shown and so stunted as a plot element that it seemed to me much ado about nothing.

I didn't hate the film but after having read so many positive reviews from critics I'd say I was immensely disappointed. The critic I now most agree with on this film is Rex Reed, except he thought Keaton's performance was a bright note and I wouldn't even give him that.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

10

PfenderStrat621Mar 15, 2015

One of the greatest cinematic achievements ever, this is a film that i can consider a modern-day masterpiece, without doubt, the best of 2014 in my opinion. To describe how perfect the movie is i have to describe the whole movie. TheOne of the greatest cinematic achievements ever, this is a film that i can consider a modern-day masterpiece, without doubt, the best of 2014 in my opinion. To describe how perfect the movie is i have to describe the whole movie. The directing is amazingly stunning, the performances are dazzling and every actor felt natural, the screenplay is brilliant treating with a lot of themes without being a mess, the characters are extremely well written and very developed, the cinematography is ground-breaking and the story is something that has been done but it was made in the most original and fantastic way. It was a mesmerizing movie from start to finish, everything felt so honest and natural, it was a relief to see something so original and different but with a purpose, and it is one of the best movies i have ever seen. This film is Iñárritu's black sheep. A film that it is misunderstood by a lot of people because of it's controversies but i can assure that it is something that is going to remembered and discussed for years.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

9

danippMar 13, 2015

Despite unnecessary things like a kiss between two women and a relationship between Stone and Norton, Birdman is another incredible film by Iñárritu. Funny, exciting, with an amazing drum sound on the background and scenes filmed on a singleDespite unnecessary things like a kiss between two women and a relationship between Stone and Norton, Birdman is another incredible film by Iñárritu. Funny, exciting, with an amazing drum sound on the background and scenes filmed on a single shot. You won't see an original and entertainment movie like that so soon! Besides, it's nice to watch Keaton playing basically himself on screen and giving us a superb performance.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MattBrady99Mar 10, 2015

Riggan: I'm nothing. I'm not even here.

The story to Birdman is about an wash up actor (Michael Keaton) - famous for portraying an iconic superhero - as he struggles to mount a Broadway play. In the days leading up to opening night, heRiggan: I'm nothing. I'm not even here.

The story to Birdman is about an wash up actor (Michael Keaton) - famous for portraying an iconic superhero - as he struggles to mount a Broadway play. In the days leading up to opening night, he battles his ego and attempts to recover his family, his career, and himself.

Okay in my review of Whiplash I bought this movie up mid way through the review just to give a heads up of when I'm going to watch it, because Birdman was my most hyped film of 2014. But just like every time I really wanted to see a film so baldy I have to wait for a while until I finally get a chance to watch it, story of my life really. But anywhere I was really looking forward to this movie ever since September, and now finally seeing the film I can safely say that Birdman is one of the best movie of 2014.

I always know that Micheal Keaton was the kind of movie star that will pick any random movie role just because... well he what's to be important and still show to everyone that he still got it, I guess?. Like early last year now he was in two movies that were pretty blah, and that was The Robocop remake and the film Need for Speed, and those films just made Keaton look like he was just cashing it in just for the sake of it. Until when I watched this movie and seeing Micheal Keaton's performance and thinking to myself "Wait is Keaton giving probably his best performance I've ever seen in my life? I think he is", because Keaton in this movie pretty much pulls of the best performance I've seen him in his all career. His character in this movie is like a wash up actor who had everything like love from the critics, his fans. Yeah he still dose have that Keaton thing that he always dose in his previous movies, but the scenes where he plays his character (Which is himself if you really look at his character in this movie) but anywhere he still gives a strong and believable performance that at times give me flashbacks of the good old days where he still had roots and felt like he isn't just cashing it in. I hear a lot of Oscar buzz about his performance in this movie, and I wouldn't be surprise if he wins because he totally deserves it. Excellent work Keaton.

Edward Norton is this movie pretty much plays a familiar character to himself has the hard to work with actor that at times doesn't follow the lines that he was given or even the direction he was told. We already know that Norton is a fantastic actor in his previous work, but in this movie his performance could be descried has stellar and insanely good.

Emma Stone is this movie and of course like most of the actors I named of so far of who outstanding they were in this movie and well you can already guess what I'm going to say next. Emma Stone acting in this movie was just terrific and marvellous to watch in this movie and it's good to see a real break out performance from her more than the lay back ones in her other movies. Nice one Emma. The other cast in the movie like Naomi Watts, Zach Galifianakis both did good as well.

The movie is shot to look like it's all one shot take and my mind was just blown away by that fact. There where screens were I said to myself "Oh my god is it one shot?", well I can already imagine the stress, hard work and how many takes they had to do to get it, and boy did it pay off nicely, because I couldn't take my eyes off the screen. I dared myself to look away from the beautiful cinematography and the impressive editing used in the film.

The movie has a brilliant message about film critics today that doesn't feel like it's in your face message that you normally get in movies. There is a scene in this movie and it's not a spoiler by the way, but I really need to get this out the way first. So anywhere Micheal Keaton character just starts having a rant over this theater critic who is going to give a bad review to his play when she hasn't even seen it or seen any of the premieres. He talks about how she only users big words that nobody will say in person and shes to lazy to come up what she really thinks about it so she users big words just to fill in the sentence. This movie probably has the best rant in movie history and Keaton in that scene shows how good of a actor that he is.

For problems in the movie... I really don't have any to be honest.

I loved this movie and yes I'm coming out be saying that. This isn't just the best movie of the year and such, no this is just flawless film making right here. Birdman and Whiplash are the two films I will highly recommend to people because those two films are my favorite films of 2014.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

Bio-Machine-AbhMar 9, 2015

I literally fell asleep. Maybe at another time I could appreciate a movie like this, but ultimately it came off as overly narcissistic, basically it was by thespians, about the struggle of being a thespians, then promoted or highly rated byI literally fell asleep. Maybe at another time I could appreciate a movie like this, but ultimately it came off as overly narcissistic, basically it was by thespians, about the struggle of being a thespians, then promoted or highly rated by thespians to help their friend thespians. Nothing is wrong with that, but a film should be rated on its merit, not how much your friends like it. It also comes off as lazy writing. Autobiographical type fiction, that basically means all you have to do is write down what events happened during the day. "I woke up, took a shower, went to work, ate a sandwich."… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

9

googolendtimesMar 8, 2015

Masterfully assembled, "Birdman" is an electrifying and innovative technical tour de force on every feasible level. It showcases exceptional performances by Michael Keaton and Edward Norton who execute their roles with self-deprecatingMasterfully assembled, "Birdman" is an electrifying and innovative technical tour de force on every feasible level. It showcases exceptional performances by Michael Keaton and Edward Norton who execute their roles with self-deprecating reckless abandon.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

4

tomizawaMar 7, 2015

Extremely disappointing. I expected too much from this movie, but it turned out not to be my cup of tea. There I was, expecting a relevant and extraordinary plot, and all I got was some absurdist film. If you like that kind of thing, this isExtremely disappointing. I expected too much from this movie, but it turned out not to be my cup of tea. There I was, expecting a relevant and extraordinary plot, and all I got was some absurdist film. If you like that kind of thing, this is for you. The writing (dialogues) was pretty messy and failed to portray "realism". This movie is good if you wanna have a topic of conversation or you are a film critic/fan. Otherwise either you love Absurism or you will just hate this movie.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

silveradoMar 7, 2015

Some of my very favorite movies are about the subject of taking a look behind the curtains of the movie industry. I'm talking about the brilliant films All About Eve and Sunset Boulevard. Both movies featured an actress, struggling with ageSome of my very favorite movies are about the subject of taking a look behind the curtains of the movie industry. I'm talking about the brilliant films All About Eve and Sunset Boulevard. Both movies featured an actress, struggling with age and a declining career. As I am writing this I realize why I probably loved these film's anti hero's and why I hate Birdman: only women are awesome when hysterical, defenitely not men. Lately I kind of start to hate modern 'art house' movies. These movies take themselves so serious, and that's why they are so boring. In my opinion, opposite a cynical caracter should be a loveable and warm caracter. But in the movies of especially this Inarrity guy, all caracters drown in their indulging misery. It's like you, the movie goer, is forced to agree with him, which I completely reject.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

7

jgzegerMar 6, 2015

Although this film is superbly acted and directed, it is flawed by an ending that is confusing at best and perhaps totally meaningless. I have read a few critics reviews of this movie and the word pretentious pops up in those reviews that areAlthough this film is superbly acted and directed, it is flawed by an ending that is confusing at best and perhaps totally meaningless. I have read a few critics reviews of this movie and the word pretentious pops up in those reviews that are less than glowing. I think they have a point here.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

percypoosMar 5, 2015

It is very hard to describe this film. Spellbinding but at the same time bordering on the ridiculous. Great acting and some poignant comments. However, this film bore the Oscar award banner and is definitely not the best film of the year.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

codayopMar 4, 2015

Clever, slightly self-indulgent, insight into an ex-movie stars attempt to reinvent himself in the thespian world.

The Look Smooth, long transitions from one scene to another using (very) long simulated single cut scenes. TheClever, slightly self-indulgent, insight into an ex-movie stars attempt to reinvent himself in the thespian world.

The Look
Smooth, long transitions from one scene to another using (very) long simulated single cut scenes.

The Soundtrack
Jazz. Fits the film, does not fit my taste.

The Adventure
Oddly rewarding escapism which kept me enthralled till the end.

Conclusion
Entertaining, funny, weird.
8/10… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

DavidV293Mar 2, 2015

It was okay. Is not the type of movie that you could watch again over and over. But it's an average comedy with great Performances by Michael Keaton And Ed Norton. Emma Stone also did a great job

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

2

jlplandMar 2, 2015

Boring, boring, Slow and uncomfortable. There's nothing interesting except for a lot of great actors wasting their time making you waste yours , do not Recomendate, Dont waste your time

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

9

ellimar188Mar 2, 2015

I absolutely loved Birdman! The writing is clever, engaging, and interesting, while Alejandro Inarritu does a brilliant job directing. I was amazed at the length of the shots in Birdman. In fact, I could not actually tell when one shot endedI absolutely loved Birdman! The writing is clever, engaging, and interesting, while Alejandro Inarritu does a brilliant job directing. I was amazed at the length of the shots in Birdman. In fact, I could not actually tell when one shot ended and another began; the entire film seemed to flow seamlessly as one scene. Furthermore, the use of magical realism was extremely interesting, showing the tormented and conflicted mental state of the protagonist, Riggan Thomson (played to perfection by Michael Keaton). As you have likely already heard, all of the actors in this film have performed extremely well.

My only minor gripe with Birdman is its use of Edward Norton's character, Mike Shiner, an unorthodox and unpredictable Broadway actor. The character takes a major role from the start to middle of the film, with hints at his troubled personal life present throughout, only for Mike to be nearly disregarded by the end. However, I am unsure how an adequate amount of time could have been devoted to Mike without infringing on Riggan's struggles. Regardless, Birdman is a great film that I would recommend to anyone looking for a thought provoking, black-comedy drama!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

sobellejanetMar 1, 2015

We watched it because it won Best Picture. Why I don't know (that it won). For a film to truly connect and be likable, it's helpful to be able to like some of the characters. I can't remember when I've ever been introduced to such aWe watched it because it won Best Picture. Why I don't know (that it won). For a film to truly connect and be likable, it's helpful to be able to like some of the characters. I can't remember when I've ever been introduced to such a shallow, angry, selfish, bunch of hipsters. For that's what they are. Just edgy hipsters with lots and lots of "clever" snarky lines. I suppose Hollywood finds this meaningful as that is about all they know, but the rest of us are lucky enough to live away from that empty world of full time self absorption. Maybe the way it was shot was innovative; that certainly doesn't make it worthy of anything more than some technical achievement. I had stopped reading the 1st book in Will Durant's History of Civilization series to watch this movie. What a mistake. There is more value for the soul and intellect in any 1 page of that book than anywhere in the entire length of this movie.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

0

Knux0rzFeb 28, 2015

This movie is not for people who enjoy movies. It is for people who would interpret a black & white video of a rat as a metaphor for America's sins. Not enjoyable in any way, not funny, not dramatic. The movie made me feel uncomfortable andThis movie is not for people who enjoy movies. It is for people who would interpret a black & white video of a rat as a metaphor for America's sins. Not enjoyable in any way, not funny, not dramatic. The movie made me feel uncomfortable and bored the entire time. Also, I feel like the trailers for the movie should qualify as false advertising. 0/10, worst movie of the decade.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

8

rBoseFeb 28, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I couldn't find anything negative about it except the ending which in fact was put there to let the viewer decide the fate of the movie. He is definitely dead but she may have wanted to see him as he really was, Birdman.

And again, I would have liked if The Grand Budapest Hotel had won the Best Picture oscar.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

hshjeannieFeb 27, 2015

The acting is stellar, this includes not just Keaton and Norton, but also Naomi Watts, Emma Stone, Zach Galifianakis, Amy Ryan and Andrea Riseborough. The film is heavy on style - and yes it's a refreshing style. But the intense "edginess"The acting is stellar, this includes not just Keaton and Norton, but also Naomi Watts, Emma Stone, Zach Galifianakis, Amy Ryan and Andrea Riseborough. The film is heavy on style - and yes it's a refreshing style. But the intense "edginess" created by Inarittu is not my idea of "comedy" black or otherwise. The the appeal of this type of intensity is highly subjective - at times it was simply too much for me. The jagged tone and intensity made it difficult to appreciate what was a dramatic tool - this Birdman / alter-ego that we hear in Keaton's head. It's not entertaining when you can't help but wonder if the man is seriously suffering from mental breakdown marked with schizophrenia. ( No spoilers here) And then there's the whole BIG fact that this is film is for movie/stage insiders, yes the actors and the director are having a grand time, and those in the industry can thoroughly enjoy this self-indulgent vanity piece - but as for the rest of us?… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

jppl1999Feb 27, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It is unique and, even with slights, that same uniqueness will never overrate the film. "The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance" is just a bubble that develops as part of the identity of Riggan during the film and the constant apparition of characters like Sam and even Birdman create the sense of reality that was missing inside Thomson's appreciation of life; the end is different and it makes the audience decide whether the movie is worth it or not (it is!).… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

ScarziFeb 27, 2015

There was a couple good moments in this movie but it was just bad. This is just one of those movies that is hyped into the sky that just doesn't deliver. I am sure a lot of people in the movie/theatre industry can relate to and is the soleThere was a couple good moments in this movie but it was just bad. This is just one of those movies that is hyped into the sky that just doesn't deliver. I am sure a lot of people in the movie/theatre industry can relate to and is the sole reason its gotten so much hype. At most its a 6.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

10

JohnMasterLFeb 27, 2015

Birdman odia las criticas al igual que a los críticos. Es un espectáculo, a todos aquellos que disfruten del cine, lo comenten entre sus amigos, familia, hacen debates sobre una pelicula de cualquier genero al momento de salir de la función;Birdman odia las criticas al igual que a los críticos. Es un espectáculo, a todos aquellos que disfruten del cine, lo comenten entre sus amigos, familia, hacen debates sobre una pelicula de cualquier genero al momento de salir de la función; quedaran totalmente satisfechos, porque Birdman no es solo una obra de Arte con su excelente Guion, Actuaciones, Soundtrack, Fotografía, Edición y Dirección, también es una critica social, donde nos recuerda que ahora el cine es comercial, la mejor pelicula es aquella que gana mas dinero, y no solo eso; aquella pelicula también tiene que tener acción, explosiones, efectos especiales, sexo, pornografía y drogas para ser considerada "una obra maestra" y cualquier otra que no cuente con esto y solo incluya un Guion inteligente y filosófico es mala y aburrida. ¿Estos tiempos son una mierda no? Birdman es una pelicula que critica a otras películas y ellos se critican a si mismos, un circulo vicioso de la ignorancia. Esos 4 OSCARS los tiene muy bien merecidos, mi favorita del 2014.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

kokolittFeb 26, 2015

Je ne comprend pas pourquoi ce film a une telle note... Je n'ai rien compris a l'histoire, film sans queue ni tete... en plus de ca il dure 2h... bref a ne pas voir...

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

7

KenmeiFeb 25, 2015

Very dark and extremely funny and uplifting at the same time, this movie is about as contrasting as you can possibly have it. The one continuous shot that is used to film the movie is a nice touch and is definitely different than what I"veVery dark and extremely funny and uplifting at the same time, this movie is about as contrasting as you can possibly have it. The one continuous shot that is used to film the movie is a nice touch and is definitely different than what I"ve seen before. The main issue I have here is the movie definitely thinks it's alot smarter than it really is with its portrayal of a man slowly realizing he's not what he once was then coming to terms with that. There are a ton of little stories here and there that make up the entire movie and he addresses most of them, but leaving a fairly important story behind.
I loved what Edward Norton did in this movie and he definitely stole the show for me. However his character was left in the dust toward the end. Michael Keaton did a good job here but it is Norton who I'll most remember from this movie.
I just couldn't over the fact that this movie felt like Oscar bait the entire way through. And for a movie that tries to keep you on the edge of your seat the entire time, the big scene at the end was fairly predictable. I'm not entirely sure if I liked this movie but I can definitely say it was good enough to watch.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

1

diondiikaFeb 25, 2015

I don't understand of all the critics praising this dull movie, and what really inconvenient is that this movie won Academy Award's Best Picture, this movie should've nominated at Razzies anyway, rather than Oscars

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

10

bungdoodserfurrFeb 24, 2015

This movie was amazing! So glad it won Best Picture. I would've been disappointed if Boyhood won, sure it was extremely ambitious ambitious filmmaking, but I feel that overshadowed the fact that the movie was kind of bland and aboutThis movie was amazing! So glad it won Best Picture. I would've been disappointed if Boyhood won, sure it was extremely ambitious ambitious filmmaking, but I feel that overshadowed the fact that the movie was kind of bland and about nothing. Birdman, however, was a equally ambitious filmmaking and a great story and characters to boot. Keaton deserved the Oscar for best actor. He gave the best performance of last year, and if J.K. Simmons wasn't so fantastic in Whiplash, Norton would be putting a golden man in his bathroom too. See this film if you haven't, it's one of the most original films of the past decade.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

2

skykappahFeb 24, 2015

The only reason I can think of, how people could like this film was because they were afraid of snooty alternative types calling them dumb. Really... it was crap... and for it to win an Oscar... well it figures, because awards mostly goThe only reason I can think of, how people could like this film was because they were afraid of snooty alternative types calling them dumb. Really... it was crap... and for it to win an Oscar... well it figures, because awards mostly go against the grain. Good acting by Keaton though, everybody else seemed too absorbed in the fact that they were in an Oscar baiting movie. I watched the nominated films before the awards and knew Birdman would win. So embarrassingly predictable.… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

9

flametail23Feb 24, 2015

Birdman was the first movie to come out in 2015 here in the UK, it is also the best movie of 2015 so far. The acting and writing is SUPERB, the cast is also very great. The thing I love most tho is that the movie feels like a one shot, whichBirdman was the first movie to come out in 2015 here in the UK, it is also the best movie of 2015 so far. The acting and writing is SUPERB, the cast is also very great. The thing I love most tho is that the movie feels like a one shot, which is hard to pull off.
9/10… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

Gerry863Feb 23, 2015

Only Hollywood types would love this weird film. Music was terrible, filmography was worse. Acting consisted of shouting at each other. I certainly wasn't entertained by this crap. If this was a film about Hollywood it shows how bad it has become.

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

9

teaguewdFeb 23, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Occasionally a film comes along that really kicks ass. As this is basically the full-package, I’m going to focus first and foremost on the performances.

Acting is foregrounded in this film as a primary stylistic device. We see the tandem of realism and exaggerated acting styles perfectly navigate the meta-ness of the film, as we go through a backstage broadway show within a film, at times not quite sure if they are performing within the diegetic world the way its 'edited'. The decision to do the whole bit in a 'single shot' ensures we don't cut away and miss any of the great interactions that the narrative is positively bulging with(Although the camera moves at just the right rhythm for us to lose track of the contents of one scene and make room for the next). Scenes are divided in a way that is genuinely unique, cuts presumably coming as the camera wanders away as characters disperse, makes its way through the dark halls and reassimilates to a new encounter, unencumbered by traditional impeding notions of spatial or temporal continuity(but still keeping an interestingly motivated progression of events).

Ed Norton is pretty forceful in this film, it seems he's really come to terms with some of the lore around his being a pain in the ass to work with. Early scenes between he and Keaton are made exceptionally intense and riveting by the perpetually moving camera, its propensity to lunge in for close-ups and orbit the face give them great opportunities to lash out at one another, of which they take full advantage.

A thinner, almost sickly Emma Stone moves outside her previous typecast persona into something a little edgier and more utilitarian; its always a milestone when an actor finally gives you performance that allows us to forget our glaring yet superficial associations with their typical roles(for her, this is it).

Of Michael Keaton, someone said this was his best performance, it may have been he himself, and of what I’ve seen, I’m inclined to agree.

The show within the show ends with a brilliant reflexive moment, echoing in meaningful homage, as Keaton's character points the gun at the audience before turning it on himself, perhaps invoking the final shot of the indelible 'Great Train Robbery', as if to signal the film's knowledge of its place in the contemporary industry flooded with the kind of escapist mass-production that the devil(bird) on his soldier tempts him with throughout.

In many ways it is both truly unique and masterfully executed, and comes in under the definition of those films that are objectively ‘worth seeing’, as even if they aren’t your cup of tea, or whatever, there is something of intrigue that will inevitably strike.

The incompatibility of Hollywood and art is the primary issue that the film, and its main character deal with in the film, and I think it will take audiences and critics alike, awhile to collectively and retrospectively make the utmost of sense out of this movie, but in the aftermath of its winning of the Oscar for Best Picture, among others, it only complicates the issue. If you have any stake in it, and you do, you should go see this film.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

hugoactiviaFeb 23, 2015

Great movie overall, screenplay was perfectly written and actors came through. Outstanding directing indeed and "one take" style very appealing, however, it seemed to me that the movie itself lacked a bit of action - not talking aboutGreat movie overall, screenplay was perfectly written and actors came through. Outstanding directing indeed and "one take" style very appealing, however, it seemed to me that the movie itself lacked a bit of action - not talking about shootings and car chases - just something that would have kept me more into the movie. I got bored in some parts.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

exceeder616Feb 23, 2015

THsi movie was extremely boring. The camera moved way to much, i dont care if thats artictic it blows. I really didnt even know what the hell was going one because of it.

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

9

DarthAlcoholicFeb 23, 2015

Funny, gripping, fantastical. Three of the many words I could use to describe this excellent film. Everything about it caught my imagination but one thing I'm very impressed with is the lenght of scenes and the continuous camera shots.

TheFunny, gripping, fantastical. Three of the many words I could use to describe this excellent film. Everything about it caught my imagination but one thing I'm very impressed with is the lenght of scenes and the continuous camera shots.

The acting was great especially Michael Meaton portrayal of a man who is trying to keep it all together and balance his work and family life.

Superb!… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

ConjureFeb 23, 2015

My god, what a piece of junk Hollywood foisted on the general public with this movie.
After watching the first 25 minutes of it I realized that I had wasted 30 minutes of my life.
The movie should have been titled “The Bird” because itMy god, what a piece of junk Hollywood foisted on the general public with this movie.
After watching the first 25 minutes of it I realized that I had wasted 30 minutes of my life.

The movie should have been titled “The Bird” because it was so awful. Overacting, poor script, and unrealistic dialogue all fitted into the formula for this flick. It was Hollywood’s overindulgence to itself.

I am glad Michael Keaton got a chance to star in a movie but his acting was so over the top. And the same applied to Edward Norton, who is a fine actor.

I am sure a better movie could have be written about an actor who wanted to transition from Comic Hero to a dramatic actor. But this movie falls so flat on its face it needs nose surgery.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

8

WellerFeb 23, 2015

Although I personally don't believe this film should have won Best Picture, I still very much enjoyed the film. Keaton gave a strong performance as a former acting star suffering mid life crisis. The supporting cast is also pretty good, andAlthough I personally don't believe this film should have won Best Picture, I still very much enjoyed the film. Keaton gave a strong performance as a former acting star suffering mid life crisis. The supporting cast is also pretty good, and the film as a whole was a fun, creative concept.

I'd recommend seeing it, but in light of it's Best Picture win, if you haven't already seen it, you probably will soon.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

0

victoratorFeb 23, 2015

My God. What a complete disaster and disgrace to moviemaking. This 'movie' is a bunch of jibberish that makes no sense. It's painful to watch, it's boring and while you sit there waiting for something to happen every passing minute is justMy God. What a complete disaster and disgrace to moviemaking. This 'movie' is a bunch of jibberish that makes no sense. It's painful to watch, it's boring and while you sit there waiting for something to happen every passing minute is just another nail to the coffin. Spoiler: Nothing happens! It's a load of crap. AVOID AT ALL COSTS!… Expand

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

0

FILMCRITIC22Feb 23, 2015

Honestly this movie doesn't deserve to win anything! It is SO BAD that when I saw it in theaters back in December, I yawned 15 times then left disappointingly. The Script was terrible, Storyline awful and the acting- I have never Emma Stone'sHonestly this movie doesn't deserve to win anything! It is SO BAD that when I saw it in theaters back in December, I yawned 15 times then left disappointingly. The Script was terrible, Storyline awful and the acting- I have never Emma Stone's acting be so horrible that this is definitely her worst movie that she has ever done! I can't even sleep knowing that this piece of garbage won best film of 2014. What was the Hollywood Foreign Press and The Academy of Motion Pictures and Science thinking by having this film win best picture!?… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

0

franissavioFeb 22, 2015

Wow, this BIRDCRAP swept Oscar, an award made by, of , to hypocrites in Hollywood. Like the movie title says 'the unexpected virtue of ignorance'‼‼‼‼‼‼‼‼‼‼

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

0

loulou11Feb 22, 2015

This is the worst picture I had to sit through. It was depressing an not entertaining at all. Acting may have been good but the movie was one I wish I had not bothered to see.

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

2

AvgassFeb 22, 2015

Detestable egocentric narcissistic selfish main characters mean you just don't care what happens to any of them. Four of us watched this and all agreed it was pretty disappointing. It offers not much more than gimmicky continuous shooting andDetestable egocentric narcissistic selfish main characters mean you just don't care what happens to any of them. Four of us watched this and all agreed it was pretty disappointing. It offers not much more than gimmicky continuous shooting and mild offensive shocks. I'm genuinely surprised at the number of positive reviews.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

0

vickyxs12Feb 22, 2015

Worst waste of time ever. Bad acting, bad plot, bad directing, bad edit, bad script, with empty scenes. The main character is a psycho-loser with a huge ego, just like the actor who plays it. Just awful.

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

3

henrickzFeb 22, 2015

I'm glad my wife and I rented this on iTunes and didn't spend the money at a theatre. I can't believe this film is rated as highly as it is. I've seen worse films but I have seldom been this disappointed. It's highly overrated. My onlyI'm glad my wife and I rented this on iTunes and didn't spend the money at a theatre. I can't believe this film is rated as highly as it is. I've seen worse films but I have seldom been this disappointed. It's highly overrated. My only thought is it's unique so all of the critics just fell in love with the idea that it's not some type of sequel, prequel, crap fest that Hollywood usually puts out. I will say this is a unique film and it's definitely different.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

8

FactsFeb 22, 2015

Go into seeing this movie with an open mind, because it will certainly surprise you. The visuals are sleek and impressive, the sound track is innovative (and frankly, a little bizarre) and the acting will absolutely knock your socks off. TheGo into seeing this movie with an open mind, because it will certainly surprise you. The visuals are sleek and impressive, the sound track is innovative (and frankly, a little bizarre) and the acting will absolutely knock your socks off. The script is a little ambiguous towards the end, but I think purposely so. If you're not willing to risk seeing such an odd movie in theaters, I at least highly recommend picking it up digitally or on DVD, it's worth it.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

lyonsd78Feb 22, 2015

The star of the show here is Alejandro González Iñárritu, make no mistake about that. The innovative way he uses his photography here is what makes this movie stand out. Of course, his vision couldn't have worked with sloppy actors; andThe star of the show here is Alejandro González Iñárritu, make no mistake about that. The innovative way he uses his photography here is what makes this movie stand out. Of course, his vision couldn't have worked with sloppy actors; and Keaton, Norton and Galifinakis nail their roles. In my opinion, this isn't Emma Stone's finest moment as she constantly looked like she was acting, which has left be bewildered at her Oscar nod. The film's surrealness will work for some, but not for others. A great movie because it is uniquely shot, but falls just short of being a classic.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

2

jaytcachedFeb 22, 2015

pre·ten·tious This years critics darling is like last years American Hustle good character acting in a utterly boring movie. How do these artsy idiots brainwash themselves into giving accolades to this overrated piece of **** If this ispre·ten·tious This years critics darling is like last years American Hustle good character acting in a utterly boring movie. How do these artsy idiots brainwash themselves into giving accolades to this overrated piece of **** If this is movie of the year then it was a bad year. No real laughs or cries and the ending was totally predictable and par for the course of the new trend of movies never reaching a true conclusion. **** you academy!… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

9

JaketheClickerFeb 21, 2015

It has been a couple of months since my first time watching "Birdman" and the more I think about it, the more I love it!

From every angle, this movie succeeds. The cinematography is done with outstanding effects to make about 90% of theIt has been a couple of months since my first time watching "Birdman" and the more I think about it, the more I love it!

From every angle, this movie succeeds. The cinematography is done with outstanding effects to make about 90% of the film in a single, artificial shot. The free flowing nature of the camera work fits into the film so well by bringing us into the pressure that these actors must feel (both as the characters must feel as well as the pressure of not screwing up a 10 minute take). Everything feels real, everything feels on edge and everything feels like it's one long continuous disaster an inch away from falling apart. It's an extra layer in what the characters are feeling. It's also an outstanding achievement in cinema. Everybody in front of the camera does a fantastic job, bringing in their A game. Keaton, Norton, Stone, everybody is incredible here. The film explores the idea of artistic creation vs. Hollywood fame and what the two mean for actors, critics and audience expectations. Keaton's character struggles to shake off the perception of him being a Hollywood, one hit wonder as the superhero Birdman by writing, directing and starring in his own adaption Raymond Carver for Broadway. The writing is clever and helps dissect what this all means for the film industry while at the same time giving this black comedy some style. It's also worth pointing out how brilliant the casting of Keaton is in this main role, he must have had a great time playing this role. The soundtrack also goes without saying, it's so damn good! This film is satire, clever and delivers on being a simply next-level film in every way. I recommend everybody watch this movie, but remember, don't be the audience that expects and wants "blood, action, not this talking, depressing, philosophical bulls***".… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

1

FairFaithFeb 21, 2015

In recent weeks I have read a number of critics reviews and recommendations for the movie and it's worthiness of an Oscar. I was also curious about the themes of art imitating life with Michael Keaton's performance, as well as a cinemaIn recent weeks I have read a number of critics reviews and recommendations for the movie and it's worthiness of an Oscar. I was also curious about the themes of art imitating life with Michael Keaton's performance, as well as a cinema verite look at fame, ego, and art. While it is true these themes were explored, it didn't seem authentic, rather just another exercise in ego for these actors and Director. This is a congratulatory piece of film making made for the critics to validate THEIR wit, intelligence and insight on what poses as Art. Hope you all had fun, but I a real ticket purchasing human thought it was a scam......… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

5

swammerdamFeb 19, 2015

Great acting from Michael Keaton but a flat scenario which make a long film.
An average movie about critics and acting industries and only critics will love it.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

7

pesho_oneFeb 18, 2015

It is probably hard to really like a product if you have your expectations high on the first place. I guess this is one of the reasons, I didn't like it that much. I did enjoyed it though, but only to a certain degree. And that degree wasIt is probably hard to really like a product if you have your expectations high on the first place. I guess this is one of the reasons, I didn't like it that much. I did enjoyed it though, but only to a certain degree. And that degree was limited by this sense I got throughout the whole movie. The characters were actors and the actual actors... well.. where also... uh... actors. But never mind, it was one chain reaction of acting all over the place. And don't get me wrong, - it was all good acting both pretended-real, real and real but pretended to be pretended-real. And it was wise and daring... If you think about it, it can even be sum up by these words: acting, wise thoughts, daring,.. and probably... twitter? I don't know it is a strange movie, which interestingly, also succeeds to be entertaining.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

The__ShowmanFeb 17, 2015

Birdman or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance is an American Black Comedy directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu. This movie is highly appreciative for it camera work and editing. Emmanuel Lubezki (Cinematographer), Douglas Crise andBirdman or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance is an American Black Comedy directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu. This movie is highly appreciative for it camera work and editing. Emmanuel Lubezki (Cinematographer), Douglas Crise and Stephen Mirrione (Editors) deserves a big round of applause for most intensive care they took for this film as the whole movie looks like a single cut. This style of single-cut making is highly comparable to Alfred Hitchcock's 'Rope' which is an epic dramatic thriller. Although this movie 'Birdman' is touted to be a Black Comedy, it lacks that F*****g comedy because it is a drama based on a drama and what we hear most of the time is 'F**K'. You will get to know the theme of the movie at the pre-climax and it is hard for a common audience to sit 100 minutes listening to the word F**K and try to understand its meaning metaphorically. This story is about an impatient orthodox director cum actor who is trying to make a 60 year old miserable drama to reach this generation audience and believes that, it will redeem his career. Michael Keaton did a wonderful job and he is the heart and soul of this movie. But the misery is his fight with his own alternative character who is hampering him to be some other who the world really likes. This melodrama is throughout the movie and for a normal cine-goer, it is a painful watch. Do watch this movie if you want to really know how cinematography and editing looks like and if you are ardent fan of Micheal Keaton. Else forget it.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

NedRyerson1Feb 17, 2015

Birdman is a type of movie that doesn't fit in Inarritu's filmography, because the kind of characters portrayed; and that doesn't fit in any previous category at all, because the way of filming it. The protagonist described is fighting for anBirdman is a type of movie that doesn't fit in Inarritu's filmography, because the kind of characters portrayed; and that doesn't fit in any previous category at all, because the way of filming it. The protagonist described is fighting for an ideal much bigger than himself, looking for transcendence and this obsession will take him to the edge (it sounds more as an Aronofsky's character than an Inarritu's one). From the cast, I can only save Sam (the stereotype of misunderstood and abandoned daughter), Mike (another stereotype of the pedantic and self-centered actor that does what we wants on the stage) and Ms. Dickinson (stereotype of the critic that hates everything and has an opinion even before seeing the play); the rest are a bunch of filling. About the story it's better not to talk about, doomed from the beginning, any outcome will be boring or cliche. What really shines on this film is the form of making it: long shot, cinematography, score, the use of the play inside a play, the voice-over that finally becomes tangible and the acting, highlighting Michael Keaton, Edward Norton and Emma Stone.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

ashraf3812Feb 17, 2015

This is a wholly different , original and audacious film. About what ?? well the story is simple. a washed up actor trying to come back with a Broadway play. However , it's ambiguous and you've (me too) watch it more than once to dig more andThis is a wholly different , original and audacious film. About what ?? well the story is simple. a washed up actor trying to come back with a Broadway play. However , it's ambiguous and you've (me too) watch it more than once to dig more and more of its precisely-packed layers. Is it about art versus commerciality?? Is it about the stress and urgency of life ?? for me, it's about what we do here in our lives and what the point is and the seeking of happiness and being loved.
Alejandro G. Iñárritu is great here creating magical realism with different new tone. It's sad and funny at the same moment , a fantasy that tells the very truth.
The actors are all great especially Keaton whose background as batman adds to the background of birdman and the movie uses that very well leading to a heartfelt performance.
The technical aspects are great especially the cinematography which is another character. The movie is shot into a seemingly continuous one shot creating a marvelous experience. The camera flows through and around characters , corridors of the theater and the street creating a sense of being trapped into this this life. It left me dazzled and exhausted.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

adpirtleFeb 14, 2015

I can't think of a bad thing to say about this film. The direction and cinematography are very well done, making the theater in which the bulk of the film occurs a character in itself, rather than just a series of settings in which scenesI can't think of a bad thing to say about this film. The direction and cinematography are very well done, making the theater in which the bulk of the film occurs a character in itself, rather than just a series of settings in which scenes happen. The screenplay is top-notch, for the most part avoiding cliches in its rather unique telling of a familiar story. The actors are terrific. Nobody holds anything back, least of all Keaton, who gives the performance of his life.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

RamonGuerreroFeb 13, 2015

A visual masterpiece, well written, amazingly acted and terrifically directed.
Birdman follows the story of Riggan Thompson, played masterfully by Michael Keaton, and his descent into madness, by showing up metaphors and amazinglyA visual masterpiece, well written, amazingly acted and terrifically directed.
Birdman follows the story of Riggan Thompson, played masterfully by Michael Keaton, and his descent into madness, by showing up metaphors and amazingly choreographed long shots.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

JULIUSCORREAFeb 13, 2015

O filme conta a história de Riggan, um ator experiente, mas que ficou marcado por interpretar um super-herói, o Homem-Pássaro, e agora tenta mostrar que ele pode mais do que isso, investindo tudo em uma apresentação na Broadway. Peça escrita,O filme conta a história de Riggan, um ator experiente, mas que ficou marcado por interpretar um super-herói, o Homem-Pássaro, e agora tenta mostrar que ele pode mais do que isso, investindo tudo em uma apresentação na Broadway. Peça escrita, dirigida e atuada por Riggan. O filme se passa na semana de estreia de sua peça.

O diretor Alejandro González Iñarritu tem a intenção de fazer um plano-sequência, onde não há cortes drásticos ou são quase imperceptíveis, pois o filme se passa basicamente no teatro onde será realizada a peça. E ele o faz com excelencia, não se vê o tempo passa muito bem, por culpa das cenas sequenciais. O elenco mostra a que veio, principalmente com as ótimas atuações de Michael Keaton, Edward Norton e Emma Stone, mas até Zack Galafianakis, conhecido por seu papel em 'Se Beber, Não Case!' e Naomi Watts, tem atuações boas no filme.

Cheio de dramas e surtos, o longa tenta mostrar os problemas e desavenças dentro do show business, transmitindo a ansiedade da estreia através dos personagens em diversas maneiras. E a forma usada para demostrar o passado sobre a vida de Riggan, através de uma voz falando como se fosse a sua consciência, é um bom ponto do filme. Cercado de ótimas atuações o filme convence, mas passa longe de ser uma obra-prima a ser revista mais de uma vez.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

DoovdahFeb 12, 2015

Didn't know really what to expect going along to see this, and I have to say I was pleasantly surprised. Keaton plays his part very well indeed, and the supporting cast are great.

The visuals are quite mesmerizing too. Happy to recommend it.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

2

vrchrisFeb 12, 2015

Once you get over the clever "one take" filming method its just a bore-fest with a few funny moments scattered about. Very well acted though just a shame the story is too minimal.

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

10

Arthur_S_PoeFeb 11, 2015

I must admit that my first 'meeting' with Iñárritu turned out to be quite a fascinating experience. The concept of the movie is absolutely fantastic and it is certainly a film about art and artists, a classical literal theme transferred toI must admit that my first 'meeting' with Iñárritu turned out to be quite a fascinating experience. The concept of the movie is absolutely fantastic and it is certainly a film about art and artists, a classical literal theme transferred to the screen with such masterful skill that you can't help but admire the art.

It is a brilliantly devised black comedy, full of sardonic humor but also a very specific viewpoint that allows the viewer to look into the mind of an artist, in this case both the actor and the director, as the border between the movie and reality, between what is actually the plot of the movie and what is the artistic idea of Iñárritu, is very fluid, sometimes even non-existent. Iñárritu actually utilizes a theatrical method, a characteristic of modern theatre, thereby destroying the classical border between several aspects - the film itself, the viewers, the director, the plot and the idea. It is a metaesthetical analysis of the visual arts and Iñárritu realized it masterfully.

The acting is also a very strong aspect of the movie. All of the actors fulfill their roles brilliantly, but you cannot escape from the magical interpretations of Edward Norton and Michael Keaton. Norton, one of my favourite actors, is absolutely amazing, is a cynic and a bohemian, a master of the theatre enjoying the praise of a master actor, of a true artist positioned above the more popular yet artistically weaker Michael Keaton, whose Riggan Thomson is trying to revitalize his career and find true artistic meaning through the theatre, an institution so familiar to Norton's brilliant Mike Shiner. It is an absolute shame that Norton found himself alongside the brilliant J.K. Simmons this year (a sure victor at the Oscars), because he undoubtedly delivered an Oscar-winning performance. The same goes for Michael Keaton, who, in addition to that, certainly delivered the role of his career. His Golden Globe-winning performance is an absolute hit, in every way adapted to the idea Iñárritu envisioned with this film and certainly an internal battle for Keaton himself, who had to wait up until now to deliver such a dramatically and artistically strong role. Riggan Thomson is a psychologically polarized actor, an ex-star realized through shallow superhero roles, looking to prove to the world and to himself that he is wroth something, that he is actually an actor. His internal struggle, his obsession and his self-devouring psyche - all of them brilliantly portrayed by the excellent Keaton who managed to give us a look into a very specific mental construction (I thought to myself - now I finally know what went through Heath Ledger's mind before his tragic death).

Iñárritu has also presented us with a very specific aesthetic in 'Birdman', a very gentle approach to the technical and visual realization of the film combined with a series of surreal elements that wonderfully add up to the concept itself, thereby creating a magnificent blend only a few selected directors can create.

To conclude, 'Birdman' is truly a wonderful movie with a very specific set of exceptional strengths that are masterfully combined with a strong crew and a powerful idea. It is a surrealist retelling of a psychological process often foreign to the common viewer, but nonetheless amazing and wonderful.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

lasttimeisawFeb 11, 2015

Finally I can get around to watch several current Oscar contenders before this year’s ceremony arriving in mere two weeks. BIRDMAN is the most intriguing one, it might give Alejandro González Iñárritu the prestige which his fellow MexicanFinally I can get around to watch several current Oscar contenders before this year’s ceremony arriving in mere two weeks. BIRDMAN is the most intriguing one, it might give Alejandro González Iñárritu the prestige which his fellow Mexican compatriot Alfonso Cuarón has received one year earlier for GRAVITY (2013, 9/10), simply because the film is the another formidable labour-of-love with a paradigm-shifting cinematographic endeavour, not a coincidence, the two films share the same DP Emmanuel Lubezki, not even detractors can deny BIRDMAN’s spurious one-long-take gimmick is a wonder to witness, sometimes viewers are so much so that being overpowered by the slithering camera movements in the masterly spatial structures and even overlook the proceedings on screen, so, a re-watch is highly recommended.

keep reading my review on my blog, google: cinema omnivore… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

5

AxeTFeb 9, 2015

Yet another obscenely over-rated film by jackass critics. Well acted yes. Very hard to do with the single long take camera moves. Technically very impressive. A good immersive movie with strong story that works fully on an audience? NotYet another obscenely over-rated film by jackass critics. Well acted yes. Very hard to do with the single long take camera moves. Technically very impressive. A good immersive movie with strong story that works fully on an audience? Not even. The director likes to think of himself as a challenging filmmaker, but really it's more about being pretentious and kissing the ass of a stuffy New York Broadway live theatre intelligentsia to get attention which it sure got. To make a movie with a strong narrative that moves viewers along is far harder. I like Michael Keaton and he's very good in a role made for him, but sorry this is not great. Watch now as the sheep of the Academy vote for it anyway.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

FyanElFeb 8, 2015

A splendid film that can make the audience relate to their matters in reality. This is a movie about a man trying to succeed in becoming a theater actor,but his fans only cared about his past works. Get ready to laugh your socks out with oneA splendid film that can make the audience relate to their matters in reality. This is a movie about a man trying to succeed in becoming a theater actor,but his fans only cared about his past works. Get ready to laugh your socks out with one liners,also do pay attention to rants the characters did on the issues we face in the current society.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

beycauseFeb 6, 2015

Achei interessante a crítica que o filme faz ao cinema atual, realmente é bem do jeito que eles retrataram. Se não for um filme Marvel/DC cheio de efeitos, explosões e uma produção caríssima, dificilmente você irá conseguir holofotes. EmmaAchei interessante a crítica que o filme faz ao cinema atual, realmente é bem do jeito que eles retrataram. Se não for um filme Marvel/DC cheio de efeitos, explosões e uma produção caríssima, dificilmente você irá conseguir holofotes. Emma Stone teve um belo "highlight".… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

chidimeFeb 6, 2015

This was such a fantastic movie. I kind of was bored at the beginning but as soon as it kicked into gear I was instantly in love. This is such an emotional roller-coaster of sort with superb acting. movies that get me to question life are theThis was such a fantastic movie. I kind of was bored at the beginning but as soon as it kicked into gear I was instantly in love. This is such an emotional roller-coaster of sort with superb acting. movies that get me to question life are the kind of movies I love and support. And again the acting was just superb. This is what is meant when you hear acting. Raw, perfect and emotional performances. This movie is art! Plus the twist at the end! I kinda saw it coming but I was still in suspense as to whether it was actually gonna happen or not! And the very last scene! Awesome movie! A must watch especially for those involved in theater and who see acting as art rather than mere fun.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

Kacy00Feb 6, 2015

New York's background and temporal attitude was perfect to highlight the film's central topic of ignorance and egotism. Birdman is a must-see movie that demands we look at ourselves and others without judgement.

Realism and surrealism areNew York's background and temporal attitude was perfect to highlight the film's central topic of ignorance and egotism. Birdman is a must-see movie that demands we look at ourselves and others without judgement.

Realism and surrealism are excellently executed in this movie. Tastefully acted, The Virtue of Ignorance is a great look at what it is like to be an artist on stage and in television. Riggan is an insightful flawed protagonist, as a representation of the struggles of real life actors. His pain is not something the ordinary man would understand and his actions mirror his pain.

The cast acted tremendously well and careers were solidified and made with this film. I found myself laughing out loud at the incredibly dark writing and mesmerized by the raw and honest editing choices.

Birdman is many things but most importantly, it is a love story. A love story of a man's love for his ex-wife and daughter. The struggle to love himself, his art, and love, love itself.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

borderlinefilmsFeb 4, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Mounting Spontaneity

It's not fair.

I love Raymond Carver, long takes, theatre, Batman, NYC rooftops and alleyways, the blending layers of self-referential fiction, delirious fantasy, the creative process, the insane logistics of run-on cinematography, the seamless assembly of shifting environments, stepping into unresolved mental spaces, demonstrations of solitary madness and the unbearable anticipation of being, being judged, being booed, un-being, unhinging, delusional uppers, existential downers, magic surrealism, telekinetic fury, dreams of flying, throwing tantrums, the fragile yet invincible ego, immaculately constructed chaos, the recurring climax of ending it all -- where the blazes is that blasted improvisational drumming coming from? -- oh there, and there, so absurd, don't stop, the shot must go on, the show must go on, "You are not important, get used to it," she said, but so much angst overwhelms him, tethered to a feathered fantasy, a nagging reminder of what once was, or could have been, refusing to believe it's too late to soar to former heights, yet grounded by time and gravity, trapped in a narrative, caged in a fabrication, "You're an actress, honey," says another, "you have no self-respect" and all actors are game, Keaton and Stone zoned-in, knowing the pain, pretending to not care or pretending to matter, failing to be authentic, acting over acting, meta-acting meta-fiction meta-filmed with a meta-critical message: yeah, we're all messed-up and meta-fµcked, but after shooting your nose to spite the ruse, by unmasking the unexpected virtue of ignorance, peeling off layers of pretence and self-importance, you just might find a momentary strain of pure, uncomplicated innocence.

It's not fair. I love this sh*t!… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

ydnar4Feb 4, 2015

Birdman is like no movie I've ever seen before. Way to go Michael Keaton! If you ever watch this movie be prepared to see the revival of Keaton. This is a man who has been hidden behind other characters for several years in movies like TheBirdman is like no movie I've ever seen before. Way to go Michael Keaton! If you ever watch this movie be prepared to see the revival of Keaton. This is a man who has been hidden behind other characters for several years in movies like The Other Guys and Robocop. Now he is the centre of attention and the performance is so good it earned him a Oscar nomination. Keaton also already played Batman and he has become the forgotten Batman thanks to the new Dark Knight trilogy. That only makes his Birdman role more appropriate. I would be completely happy with Michael Keaton winning the Best Actor Oscar this year and it is well earned. There are some other great performances on here from Edward Norton who really surprised me for the first half of the movie and Emma Stone who really shows that she can take on a dramatic role. I will likely only see Birdman once, but I am still glad I watched it. This movie may lack action but there is still never a dull moment.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

HomeCriticFeb 4, 2015

Tired of writing long reviews...
Movie's absolutely fantastic, I was left inspired and mesmerized.
Don't waste time here, go and watch the film! NOW!

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

GustavoTalainiFeb 3, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Quando levamos um banho de criatividade e Hollywood vem à tona!

Quem sou eu? Você é BIRDMAN.
A busca. Uma simples busca pode custar uma vida ou quase isso, mas uma busca pelo quê? Com qual propósito?
O EU – Quem você quer ser?
Inúmeras perguntas com infinitas respostas saem desta questão.

Birdman o incrível super-herói que já teve seus anos de fama e sucesso encontra-se agora substituído pelos heróis da Marvel; Riggan (Michael Keaton) foi o Homem- Pássaro, porém seu momento de enorme poder acabou e atualmente ele está falido e luta para que sua nova produção, uma inovadora peça de tetro seja seu triunfo novamente.

O elenco da peça tem sérios problemas e conflitos logo no começo do filme quando acidentalmente ou não eles perdem um ator e assim nas pressas tiveram que encontrar um substituto , Mike (Edward Norton) que acabará causando mais problemas em parte por uma ereção acidental em uma cena com Lesley (Noami Watts); Riggan tem nos seus pensamentos, uma voz que o desafia e questiona, que faz a pergunta do quem sou eu, mas não é só essa voz que atormenta o antigo super-herói, o roteiro do filme é tão brilhante, criativo e esperto que acaba por si só criando várias situações desse questionamento, Alejandro González Iñárritu apresenta seu melhor trabalho até agora como um afiado diretor e roteirista.

Emma Stone interpreta Sam, a filha de Riggan em uma atuação impressionante, mas os que realmente roubam a cena são, Edward Norton com sua terrífica performance e ele, o genial Michael Keaton o único Birdman, que nos presenteia com a melhor interpretação da sua carreira, tecnicamente o filme é impecável a cinematografia não deixa nenhum espaço em branco até os minutos finais do filme, Birdman ou (A Inesperada Virtude da Ignorância) recebeu merecidas nove indicações ao Oscar, por que realmente é um dos melhores filmes de 2014, é Surrealístico, porém real, não estou me contradizendo, quando você começar a perceber que o filme acabou, algumas perguntas surgirão nos seus pensamentos, te inspirarão e certamente farão você rir e refletir sobre quem realmente você é!… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

Movi3R3vi3werFeb 1, 2015

Birdman is a holy original and masterful piece of work from Alejandro G. Iñárritu. This features the best ensemble cast of 2014, some of the best editing I’ve ever seen and is one of the best movies of 2014.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

MantisFeb 1, 2015

This movie is just fantastic! Just went to see it without knowing what to expect. What a surprise! Lovely work of acting, and portraying rightly the ridiculous time we live in. Loved it and highly recommend it to anyone who wants to seeThis movie is just fantastic! Just went to see it without knowing what to expect. What a surprise! Lovely work of acting, and portraying rightly the ridiculous time we live in. Loved it and highly recommend it to anyone who wants to see something unexpected and clever.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

PontificatorJan 31, 2015

A great film with superb acting and plenty of material to have you discussing it into the wee hours of the night, this film is profound as it is entertaining and delivers seven (7) feathery delusional blocks to take us soaring

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

HSPLazerzJan 30, 2015

By far the best movie I have ever seen. There is truly no way to describe it well, you just have to experience it for yourself. I am just dazzled by how amazing it is.

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

3

Loler13grJan 28, 2015

I regret every single euro I gave to watch that movie. The only good things about it was the directing and some of the performances. Other than that the plot is really boring and did not keep me interested , only the main character has anyI regret every single euro I gave to watch that movie. The only good things about it was the directing and some of the performances. Other than that the plot is really boring and did not keep me interested , only the main character has any development , the camera that follows the actors around is interesting at the beginning but gets tiring after a while and the drum effect also get annoying. IMDb claims this movie is a comedy/drama which makes things even worse since the comedic parts are really awkward and do not fit in the movie at all. Finally I was really disappointed with the ending since the movie could have finished 10 minutes earlier during the final act of the play which may not seem a lot but it would really make a difference. The only enjoyable thing other than the pop-corn was the confrontation scene between Keaton and the play critic. I would suggest watching it only so you can form your own opinion about it.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

GWisahoaxJan 28, 2015

This movie is a classic, original and funny wonderful performances all round, I don't understand how anyone could give it a bad review. We need more films like this, I am sick of killer robots, this is in a class of it's own, love it,This movie is a classic, original and funny wonderful performances all round, I don't understand how anyone could give it a bad review. We need more films like this, I am sick of killer robots, this is in a class of it's own, love it, congratulations to all involved.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

moviegoerMAJan 27, 2015

Michael Keaton, as Birdman, is brilliant in this dark comedy movie. Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu takes a big risk to be different in a super hero movie, and it pays off. When you think the movie is getting predictable, it changes gears inMichael Keaton, as Birdman, is brilliant in this dark comedy movie. Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu takes a big risk to be different in a super hero movie, and it pays off. When you think the movie is getting predictable, it changes gears in his constant struggle to put on a great Broadway play, and balance with his family.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

JonDocJan 27, 2015

This one trick pony of a movie might appeal to self-referential AKtors or theatre luvvies but most normal people will find this a bit of a chore. It feels like a play (no cuts, see?) and had a few fleeting moments of interest but why theyThis one trick pony of a movie might appeal to self-referential AKtors or theatre luvvies but most normal people will find this a bit of a chore. It feels like a play (no cuts, see?) and had a few fleeting moments of interest but why they hell couldn't they hire a proper screen writer and editor?… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

9

JunghovaJan 26, 2015

Awesome movie with some fresh directing, great acting and a decent story. Knowing Michael Keaton's past and him even using his "batman" voice as a narration voice, combined with Edward Norton's acting and the behind the scenes with him andAwesome movie with some fresh directing, great acting and a decent story. Knowing Michael Keaton's past and him even using his "batman" voice as a narration voice, combined with Edward Norton's acting and the behind the scenes with him and Marvel over the Hulk franchise, kind of blends fantasy and reality which to me made for a pretty captivating movie - considering the theme and story of the movie.

Makes one wonder how much "acting" either actor had to do since neither of their careers are where they were once before....… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

unionjack26Jan 26, 2015

Firstly, I have to say it was refreshing to finally see a movie fully deserving of all the accolades and awards it's being nominated for and winning... After seeing the horrible and over-hyperd Boyhood and the lackluster Gone Girl, this was aFirstly, I have to say it was refreshing to finally see a movie fully deserving of all the accolades and awards it's being nominated for and winning... After seeing the horrible and over-hyperd Boyhood and the lackluster Gone Girl, this was a much needed glimmer of hope.

This film grabbed my attention from the get-go. It was a mish mosh of arthouse, big-budget, independent but with a theatre feel to it. I was about 5 mins in before I had to ask myself, 'Is this all one shot?!" The film flowed scene to scene effortlessly, giving the feeling of one continuous shot, a remarkable feat by director, cinematograher and editor (all deserving of awards). It gave a sort of theatre atmosphere to the film that brought you into their world and made you feel like a fly on the wall, observing but not intruding.

The dialogue was well-written and the acting performances all around were top notch. Michael Keaton is phenomenal, as he portrays an actor in the twilight and dwindling years of his career, trying to stay relevant and risking everything to do so. His alter-ego subconcious plays a significant role in his psyche that appears to affect the world around him. It gives us a glimpse into his world and allows us to better understand the character.

You can easily tell that a lot of planning, consideration, care and thought went into making this film. It's not a gimmick, but an amazing accomplishment by everyone involved in the making of. It's not a movie that needs to be explained or defended, it stands on it's own, delivers a clear message, but still leaves a little personal interpretation for the audience.

For those of us who grew up with Keaton films, there's the added nostalgia and links to his film past as the Batman and his alter-ego (Birdman) almost as a Beetlejuice feel to it. I can't say enough good things about his performance, watching him reminded me of what real acting should be and I have no doubt that his co-actors raised their game to this new standard.

The arthouse-like score blended the film together from beginning to end, giving a more anxious feeling and sense of urgency, appropriate to the scenes and story. There were few slow spots in the film, but were necessary for the audience to relax before bringing us back into the moment. The SFX were very well done and again, major kudos have to be given considering this appeared to be a single shot throughout (I'm still blown-away by it).

NYC was the perfect backdrop; the landscape and sounds virtually took me there and for 2 hours I forgot I wasn't.

This is a must-see film for anyone (except those who only like $200 million Michael Bay action/explosion-porn movies). Easily in my top 5 of all time… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

psyberdelicJan 26, 2015

Not for fans of Michael Bay. Birdman is a movie about a play while the movie is done like a theater piece. Sound confusing? Think "mashup" where two different things are put together to create something new while retaining elements ofNot for fans of Michael Bay. Birdman is a movie about a play while the movie is done like a theater piece. Sound confusing? Think "mashup" where two different things are put together to create something new while retaining elements of both. I can understand why some viewers wouldn't "get it".

I loved it. I also love live theater and movies so I got the best of both worlds. The acting is excellent. Keaton, of course, but also Edward Norton, Emma Stone, Naomi Watts, Zach Galifianakis and the rest of the ensemble are clearly cut characters.

Suspend your disbelief and enjoy the fantasy.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

michael1208Jan 26, 2015

It is not a usual drama full of dialogue or a superhero film, but the way that the screenwriters manipulate to present the whole story is surprisingly stunning. It ventures into the stage performance, film industry, the fight between theIt is not a usual drama full of dialogue or a superhero film, but the way that the screenwriters manipulate to present the whole story is surprisingly stunning. It ventures into the stage performance, film industry, the fight between the integrity and mind of the artists, the critics, the over bloating superheroes film in Hollywood; all are perfectly crafted into the life of an old actor who is struggling with his egoism in attempting to recover both his career and family. This journey of crisis, transformation, battling of stressful emotions and the inner powerful demon of himself are well played by Michael Keaton, thanks to the strong and loud jazz drum scores as well as magical, thrilling, ambitious style of delivering by Mexican director Alejandro González Iñárritu. The mind blowing and overwhelming development might make the audiences to feel that this film about art and life is imitating Nolan's style of cinematography, but the ambiguous ending has rather more complex which gives the opportunity to the audiences to decide whether to end it positively or negatively.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)

User Reviews