Amazon Studios | Release Date: December 10, 2021
6.1
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 116 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
63
Mixed:
33
Negative:
20
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
3
FilmolJan 17, 2022
The underlying problem was the script and direction, it felt like Sorkin copied and pasted various highlights from Lucille Ball’s Wikipedia page to fill in the main story about Lucille’s Communist ties but it fell flat. Despite their efforts,The underlying problem was the script and direction, it felt like Sorkin copied and pasted various highlights from Lucille Ball’s Wikipedia page to fill in the main story about Lucille’s Communist ties but it fell flat. Despite their efforts, the main characters were miscast and Kidman distracted from the story, with only the supporting cast the redeeming part. This feels like a film will not stand up to the test of time and forgotten in a few years. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
Siddharth1997Dec 11, 2021
A ridiculous, disgusting mockery of the legendary Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
0
ConzillaDec 21, 2021
Complete and utter trash. This is what happens when you allow kids of subjects to control the narrative. I particularly "love" how they made Desi look like a sober saint when he was famously drunk by 11am daily. To say nothing of the horribleComplete and utter trash. This is what happens when you allow kids of subjects to control the narrative. I particularly "love" how they made Desi look like a sober saint when he was famously drunk by 11am daily. To say nothing of the horrible casting; Kidman's facial prosthetics are so bad they're distracting, and she's just not convincing as Lucy. I don't understand the positive reviews; the story itself is boring, hard to follow and convoluted. I was so triggered by how bad this movie was, I created an account here just to review it. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
relickushkingDec 12, 2021
What do you get when you combine pleasantville with modern day wokeness & a dash of smug? This travesty of a movie not fit for the bargain bin. This movie is like pulling teeth,Javier Bardem should have known better.

Typical Hollywood
What do you get when you combine pleasantville with modern day wokeness & a dash of smug? This travesty of a movie not fit for the bargain bin. This movie is like pulling teeth,Javier Bardem should have known better.

Typical Hollywood hypocrites,they destroy shows like the Simpsons because they don't want voice actors playing a different race,then they cast Spaniards to play latinos in 99% of the time,they cast a Spaniard to play a latino legend in Desi Arnaz despite the director being as woke as they come(as they do for 99.9% of movies because they're racists against casting actual latinos OBVIOUSLY)
Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
0
lalalallalDec 20, 2021
There was absolutely ZERO chemistry between "Lucy" and "Desi". Although Nicole Kidman did her best with what she was handed , the movie lacked depth and emotion . Lucille Ball had a spunk and energy that can not be replicated , andThere was absolutely ZERO chemistry between "Lucy" and "Desi". Although Nicole Kidman did her best with what she was handed , the movie lacked depth and emotion . Lucille Ball had a spunk and energy that can not be replicated , and unfortunately Kidmans performance fell flat . Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
3
MetacriticOnurJan 5, 2022
bad
[ bad ]

adjective, worse, worst;(Slang) bad·der, bad·dest for 36.
not good in any manner or degree.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews