Beckett

Netflix | Release Date (Streaming): August 13, 2021

4.5	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 31 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

langeggAug 14, 2021

Horrible acting. Poor dialogue. No suspense. Vicki Krieps and Alicia Vikander were here for name only. Bad.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

Belen2095Aug 14, 2021

Wasted 1:50 minutes of my life. Really bad acting and very fake “action” scenes… don’t waste your time and watch something else instead ! You will thank me later!

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

JomzxAug 13, 2021

WHAT AN ABSOLUTE TRÀSH OF A MOVIE.
The pacing is as slow as my dad "just leaving to buy milk" only to come back 6 years later.
If you want to watch a movie that: · Has the most BORING PLOT EVER and even if you think it's not that bad, theWHAT AN ABSOLUTE TRÀSH OF A MOVIE.
The pacing is as slow as my dad "just leaving to buy milk" only to come back 6 years later.

If you want to watch a movie that:
· Has the most BORING PLOT EVER and even if you think it's not that bad, the EXECUTION IS.
· makes my classmate's school filmmaking project look like a masterpiece.
· has A. LOT OF injuries and still be able to run as if he's wolverine.
· has most of the protagonist's screentime just HIM RUNNING & WAVING HIS ARMS LIKE A F@€#ING DUCK. (FOR REAL THO)
· that wins MY AWARD for the MOST HORRIBLE ACTING of ALL TIME. · will make you lose your brain cells trying think of why & how this & that could possibly happen.

THEN feel to start feeling HUGE remorse & regrets for wasting 1 hour and 50 minutes of your life because you didn't f@#€ing listen to the review.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

MetacriticOnurAug 13, 2021

bad
[ bad ]

adjective, worse, worst;(Slang) bad·der, bad·dest for 36.
not good in any manner or degree.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

NoxiousAug 22, 2021

Dog **** sad part, is people get paid to make this trash and waste our time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Mauro_LanariAug 16, 2021

(Mauro Lanari)
"The feeling is that of finding oneself in front of a somewhat gratuitous exercise [...], devoid of a solid staging and capable of withstanding changes in scenery and rhythm, but the project is ambitious and all in all well(Mauro Lanari)
"The feeling is that of finding oneself in front of a somewhat gratuitous exercise [...], devoid of a solid staging and capable of withstanding changes in scenery and rhythm, but the project is ambitious and all in all well packaged" (Roberto Manassero), "the action envelope is flawless"(Emanuele Sacchi). Insignificant screenplay aside (Hitchcock, De Palma, Pakula, Pollack: are we kidding?), the expressive form is or pauperistic (a squandered budget for the cast, a John David Washington chosen before "Tenet" and a Vikander with an unrecognizable rounded face?) or of a sloppiness which by comparison "I Cesaroni" are a proof of professionalism. One is stunned by reading on the credits the names of Luca Guadagnino as producer, of Sayombhu Mukdeeprom his director of photography, of Ryūichi Sakamoto as composer of the score: were they on lunch break, on award holiday for no one knows what? Finally, the title: let's not bother and disturb the Greats without providing justifications.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Eddiecarter600Aug 18, 2021

Annoyingly bad from start to finish. JDW contributes about as much sincerity to this movie as Alan Ruck did to FBDO.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews