Batman

7

diogomendesSep 15, 2014

While the famous character known as The Joker sometimes overshadows the character title (feeling more like a Joker movie), "Batman" offers dark,stirring and eerie entertainment thanks to a witty performance from Jack Nicholson and a creativeWhile the famous character known as The Joker sometimes overshadows the character title (feeling more like a Joker movie), "Batman" offers dark,stirring and eerie entertainment thanks to a witty performance from Jack Nicholson and a creative direction from Tim Burton.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Prodigy487Aug 3, 2014

Even though the film might be a bit too cartoony like the comics, Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson's performances as Batman and The Joker are portrayed well enough to make this film an enjoyable flick.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MrMovieBuffMar 29, 2016

'Batman' is a movie that's seen many times, and while it certainly is a classic, it does have its flaws, mostly in the central characters.

The movie stars Jack Nicholson as the Joker, and Michael Keaton as the title character. Yes, it is'Batman' is a movie that's seen many times, and while it certainly is a classic, it does have its flaws, mostly in the central characters.

The movie stars Jack Nicholson as the Joker, and Michael Keaton as the title character. Yes, it is in that order as well. Directed by Tim Burton, the movie has his own unique style with colorful characters and a darker, gloomy tone to avoid the camp-style of the Adam West "Batman" from the 1960s.

The plot revolves around Batman trying to catch the Joker from injecting Gotham city with crime, and exposing the citizens to some Smile gas which incidentally transforms the people into what the Joker has become. The Joker became the crazy maniac that he is after he fell into a pool of acid which disfigures his face to form a permanent grin. Nicholson gives a great performance as the crazy Joker, but having seen the movie recently, it almost seems as if he might be over-acting his role. The loud, maniac laughs and the over-the-top delivery of some of his lines can seem a little problematic.

But this is in no way Nicholson's fault, like I said, he did a fantastic job in the role... Director Tim Burton has been known for animating his characters on screen. Not just with the pale face make-up, but possibly how he tells his actors to deliver their lines. A huge part of the Joker's performance is obviously influenced by Tim Burton's vision.

Michael Keaton is great as Bruce Wayne/Batman, but we don't delve that deep into his character. It has been said many times by other critics that this is Jack Nicholson's movie, and not Keaton's. This is true, we get more of a Joker origin story rather than the title character. This may be due to the fact that the screenplay, written by Sam Hamm and Warren Skaaren were so focused heavily on creating such an iconic villain, that they got lost in translation and forgot who the movie was for in the first place.

Other than this, 'Batman' is a visual treat, a thrilling adaptation of the Caped Crusader of Gotham city, it does feel a little jarring that we get a glimpse of Bruce's childhood/origin story almost half way through the movie, but, when you have fun with what Burton presents you with, it's hard to stay mad.

Overall, if you want a good Batman movie, this will deliver what you might want. The actors' performances outshine the overall story.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

waronassermanMay 3, 2015

cool for its time! but now has gone down. Keaton is a great batman and Nicholson is a great joker and they both carry the movie. Tim burton nails the dark tone

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

7

DanBurritoJan 6, 2016

Jack Nicholson's Joker may not compare to the legendary performance by Heath Ledger but Christian Bale's Batman (as good as he was) is nowhere near as good as Keaton's. I enjoyed this movie. My biggest complaint was the fact that a little tooJack Nicholson's Joker may not compare to the legendary performance by Heath Ledger but Christian Bale's Batman (as good as he was) is nowhere near as good as Keaton's. I enjoyed this movie. My biggest complaint was the fact that a little too many scenes revolved around The Joker (I know Jack is a big star and all, but the movie is called "Batman" not "The Joker"). But nevertheless, Michael Keaton nails it. It's difficult to imagine the guy who played Beetlejuice could nail a tormented hero like Batman but he does. And don't get me wrong, Nicholson's Joker is fun to watch- he's just a little just a bit over-the-top sometimes. Overall, a good film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BroyaxJan 2, 2017

Une vision très personnelle que ce Batman de Tim Burton qui oscille souvent comme un pendule détraqué entre le loufoque et la folie, entre une sorte de dessin animé caricatural et le kitsch voire le bizarre le plus échevelé. Comme une bandeUne vision très personnelle que ce Batman de Tim Burton qui oscille souvent comme un pendule détraqué entre le loufoque et la folie, entre une sorte de dessin animé caricatural et le kitsch voire le bizarre le plus échevelé. Comme une bande dessinée en somme qui peut se permettre toutes les facéties qui lui passent par la tête... ou presque.

Il en résulte quelque chose de déconcertant mais de résolument original, car Gotham est une ville issue de l'imagination et à nulle autre semblable : architecture gothique, mélange d'ambiance entre années 80 et années 50 et bien entendu l'homme-chauve-souris dont l'avatar Bruce Wayne est étrangement à côté de la plaque, brillamment interprété par Michael Keaton. Un héros donc bien plus humain que les tentatives trop aseptisées de Christopher Nolan.

Quant au Joker, il se taille la part du lion et Jack Nicholson lui donne une épaisseur incomparable faite d'ironie, de drôlerie et de méchanceté gratuite... un cabotin irrécupérable, un "artiste"... et un vrai dingue !

Bien sûr, le personnage de Vicky Vale est important pour l'histoire et une plastique avantageuse est une qualité non négligeable mais Kim Basinger ne cesse de nous navrer d'un bout à l'autre et du début à la fin : cette nana, c'est une souffrance.

Heureusement, la musique tonitruante de Danny Elfman se plie avec un brio stupéfiant au délire ambiant, caricaturant juste ce qu'il faut ses nombreux accents héroïco-héroïques et suit les deux névropathes de près, alternant ironie et romance.

Les répliques d'une manière générale semblent tout droit sorties d'une série B (ou Z ?) comme si elles se parodiaient elles-mêmes : il faut entendre par exemple le couplet que sort le grand Jack Palance à l'autre Jack ou les interventions "télévisées" du Joker...

Malgré sa durée raisonnable, le film souffre encore d'un manque de rythme ici et là et son côté BD est finalement autant un atout qu'un boulet à traîner, car rien n'est vraiment "sérieux" ou réaliste. Un Batman pas croyable mais auquel on adhère pour tous ses excès, loin du balai dans le fion de nombre de super-héros.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

flylexMay 21, 2017

Tim Burton finally showed that a superhero movie could have a darker and more adult tone, in addition to showing a more serious and bitter fun of the batman very different from the version shown in the series of 1966, the ambiance of gothamTim Burton finally showed that a superhero movie could have a darker and more adult tone, in addition to showing a more serious and bitter fun of the batman very different from the version shown in the series of 1966, the ambiance of gotham city is perfect is dark , Somber, cloudy and with a nostalgic tone mainly for the readers of the old HQs. The film has a good frame and does not use cuts in these, the special effects are very outdated to evaluate today and the soundtrack is classic and Perfect for the movie, Michael Keaton is adventurous as batman has all the qualities to be idealized as the best actor for the character but that does not happen lack cunning, charisma, loneliness and bitterness for him to be the ideal bruce wayne, Jack Nicholson this great As a joker, he really is a crazy pisicopata and deserves the clown clown of crime already Kim Basinger is in the movie to serve as a loving pair for the bruce wayne and endowment in danger in the hands of the jo Ker the film still has many errors in the script, mainly in what is said the convictions of the batman, and the first two acts are a bit tiring doing with spectacular third act.note 76… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CoreGamer1408May 2, 2023

Unlike the timeless Batman Returns this one is more dated and rough looking. That being said this has plenty of cool Batman moments and lots of fun Joker scenes. This version of the Batman does have a high body count. So this is the BatmanUnlike the timeless Batman Returns this one is more dated and rough looking. That being said this has plenty of cool Batman moments and lots of fun Joker scenes. This version of the Batman does have a high body count. So this is the Batman you really wouldn't want to mess with as a criminal.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LoletinAlexisSep 24, 2018

The limitations of that time, the deficient combat and the main plot affect negatively.

However, it is a very complete and well made movie, with a well-acted Bruce Wayne, a perfect Batman (despite the ironic performance thanks to his limitedThe limitations of that time, the deficient combat and the main plot affect negatively.

However, it is a very complete and well made movie, with a well-acted Bruce Wayne, a perfect Batman (despite the ironic performance thanks to his limited hood) and the best Joker (based on the comics) that it has existed.

In definitive, a great Batman movie and a great Tim Burton movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

noob328Dec 8, 2020

this film was really good for it's time. the music is iconic and Nicholson's peformance was one of the best

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

HeroicAge616Nov 1, 2021

Batman has the actors, atmosphere, and music down, if not a stellar script.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

HappyliveMay 7, 2022

zamanına göre güzel işleyiş konu ve dokusuyla kendine hayran bırakan yapımdır

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BrokenChildJul 12, 2022

Batman (1989) is a classic movie and it is pretty solid. Although it isn’t the best Batman movie and it isn’t anything special, the movie is still very unforgettable and Michael Keaton did a decent job at playing Batman and the story isBatman (1989) is a classic movie and it is pretty solid. Although it isn’t the best Batman movie and it isn’t anything special, the movie is still very unforgettable and Michael Keaton did a decent job at playing Batman and the story is pretty solid too.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DavidHJan 24, 2007

Decent, but it never quite comes together. Kim Basinger has no screen chemistry with Keaton, while the character arc is oversimplified by turning the Joker into a psychopath and while the visuals are impressive, they're not Decent, but it never quite comes together. Kim Basinger has no screen chemistry with Keaton, while the character arc is oversimplified by turning the Joker into a psychopath and while the visuals are impressive, they're not groundbreaking. Both of these points would be improved upon in Batman Returns.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

6

joao1198pedroOct 27, 2013

the first batman movie was somewhat gothic, but that does not mean it was a cool movie or has not changed the way to see superhero movies, this film is cool thanks to good acting jack nicholson.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AkashVijayJan 22, 2015

The characters are interesting but they're terribly overplayed (particularly the Joker). It's very superficial and very much all surface. But what keeps it interesting is its unpredictability and it's dark and gothic atmosphere. It's fairlyThe characters are interesting but they're terribly overplayed (particularly the Joker). It's very superficial and very much all surface. But what keeps it interesting is its unpredictability and it's dark and gothic atmosphere. It's fairly Juvenile compared to todays flawed heroes but back in 89 this was widely seen as the first sign of the maturing of superhero movies. The Casting was spot on. Nicholson is perfect for the Joker and Keaton is perfect as Batman. They're polar opposite personalities but not so different at heart.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AaronWasserman2May 6, 2014

For its time Batman was a good comic book movie. but now watching it with an older eye, its not that good. Keaton is a good batman but not so much bruce. Nicholson kills it as the joker. and the score by danny elfman is the most memorial part

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

MarickDec 10, 2014

Batman is a 1989 American superhero film directed by Tim Burton and produced by Jon Peters, based on the DC Comics character of the same name. It is the first installment of Warner Bros.' initial Batman film series. The film stars JackBatman is a 1989 American superhero film directed by Tim Burton and produced by Jon Peters, based on the DC Comics character of the same name. It is the first installment of Warner Bros.' initial Batman film series. The film stars Jack Nicholson, Michael Keaton in the title role, Kim Basinger, Robert Wuhl, Pat Hingle, Billy Dee Williams, Michael Gough, and Jack Palance. In the film, Batman deals with the rise of a costumed criminal known as "The Joker".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ZerpnosMar 4, 2017

Zamanına göre düşünecek olursak eğer, Joker ve Batman tanıtımı açısından yeterli bir filmdi. Aksiyonu ve diğer durumları için söylenecek pek bir şey yok. Ortalama bir filmdi.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

amheretojudgeNov 17, 2018

there is real ruggedness in here..

Batman Burton's taken on the cape crusader of the Gotham city is much more practical and grounded than it claims to be. Don't get it wrong, it has its weak moments and it gets cheesy at times with itsthere is real ruggedness in here..

Batman

Burton's taken on the cape crusader of the Gotham city is much more practical and grounded than it claims to be. Don't get it wrong, it has its weak moments and it gets cheesy at times with its cheap gadgets and tacky physical sequences that is clearly off putting, but amidst all these outdated thrills lies a stunning performances, a performance so mesmerizing that it has the potential to carry off the entire movie. There is real ruggedness in here, mano-y-mano as Nicholson calls it, and it's that humane emotion that makes it more gritty and smart. The screenplay is tightly packed that keeps offering twists and turns in this cat and mouse chase until it grows mature and fiddles with character's emotions.

The conversations are pragmatic but the dialogues are cinematic, they demand attention through it especially Nicholson's ideologies that are expressed through monologues and one liners that may or may not crack you up but it surely is palpable to the bold decisions the character makes. It might be gullible, but it also keeps you thoroughly busy in its crime world, from fake advertisement to press news and from cutthroat politics to slick agendas that keeps flipping like a coin, it is immensely enthralling to encounter a good old protagonist-antagonist striking their horns on screen.

Aforementioned, Nicholson is the heartbeat of this case, he is hilarious, intriguing, impressive, at times predictable but not scary as he should have been. Keaton as Batman is over chewing stuff and other supporting cast fades away in front of Nicholson's cynical laugh. Burton needs to up his game whilst pulling off heist and explosions, the fighting sequences could have easily been convincing. Batman works as far as it is a political drama as soon as it starts paying its due to the comic book fans, it dips vigorously down.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

CTHReviewsMar 8, 2018

While Keaton isn't that convincing as Bruce Wayne, Vicki Vale is pretty useless as a character, the pacing can drag, and Batman seems to always be on top of things, Tim Burton's Batman is still an okay superhero flick that changed the genre,While Keaton isn't that convincing as Bruce Wayne, Vicki Vale is pretty useless as a character, the pacing can drag, and Batman seems to always be on top of things, Tim Burton's Batman is still an okay superhero flick that changed the genre, allowing us to take them more seriously.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Tez555Jul 4, 2020

I've never been a massive fan of the older Batman movies and recently me & the mrs decided to rewatch all the Batmans and honestly, so far this is possibly the worst. OK technically it's a better film (obviously) than Batman & Robin, but thisI've never been a massive fan of the older Batman movies and recently me & the mrs decided to rewatch all the Batmans and honestly, so far this is possibly the worst. OK technically it's a better film (obviously) than Batman & Robin, but this was just so slow and felt like a REALLY old movie. I mean, at this point Die Hard, Predator, Terminator & Aliens had all come out, but this feels like a film from 10 years before them. Some of the FX are laughable, it has that weird gun sound effect that no gun has ever sounded like that sounds like a 60's action film. It's not bad, it just feels sooo dated.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

movielover28Jul 13, 2020

Sure, this is a good movie, but if you compare it to any of the Dark Knight Trilogy entries it is nothing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

imthenoobFeb 1, 2020

It's certainly watchable but not without its flaws. There is too much focus on the Joker, not enough on Batman. There really isn't much character building and not once do you feel Batman is in danger or that any of his opponents are a threatIt's certainly watchable but not without its flaws. There is too much focus on the Joker, not enough on Batman. There really isn't much character building and not once do you feel Batman is in danger or that any of his opponents are a threat to him. And I felt that it totally falls apart in the last third of the movie. The ending was simply awful and highlights just how poorly written this movie was.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

MalevolentJun 9, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Well, I finally watched this movie and I was not impressed. Maybe its because I watched the Nolan films first. Jack Nicholson as the Joker was weird. I didn't like him. I wasn't a big fan of Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne or Batman. Vicki Vale annoyed the hell out of me. I REALLY did not like the music by Prince. The part where Batman killed the thug really bothered me and yes, I know that Batman has killed people before, but that was a long time ago. And then there was the part where Joker shot down the Batwing with a bullet. A bullet. Really? I liked the music by Danny Elfman and I liked Alfred, but other than that I can't think of other things I liked about this movie. I didn't like the movie, but I didn't dislike it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Potarto72Dec 21, 2014

This film has a great atmosphere, and is very well-executed on a technical level, but none of the substance really works. The acting is dry, the characters are insufficient, and the story serves only to force the Batman logo onto the bigThis film has a great atmosphere, and is very well-executed on a technical level, but none of the substance really works. The acting is dry, the characters are insufficient, and the story serves only to force the Batman logo onto the big screen. It all just feels like a cash-in that happened to turn out looking pretty cool, but beyond that there isn't much to behold.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

coywowJan 30, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. astronomically mid. its not a bad movie at all, not a big michael keaton fan at all… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

RirenJan 30, 2007

Good for children and little more, Tim Burton's vision of Gotham is underwhelming. Every set is either boring or art designed to death. The score is legendary, but can't save the wooden acting of all but one cast member - Jack Good for children and little more, Tim Burton's vision of Gotham is underwhelming. Every set is either boring or art designed to death. The score is legendary, but can't save the wooden acting of all but one cast member - Jack Nicholson, who turns in an all-time great performance as the villain, the Joker. He gleefully steals every scene he's in, and thank goodness for him. The action is overwrought and cloying. Worse, several of its plot decisions (no spoilers here) became cliches that ruined several other franchises, including this one.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful

4

crstfrFeb 1, 2011

Perhaps it is because I saw the Nolan films first but I was unimpressed with the lack of plot and the mix and match thing they've got going on with the set. Keaton was decent and Nicholson a redeemer, but I maintain there was a negligiblePerhaps it is because I saw the Nolan films first but I was unimpressed with the lack of plot and the mix and match thing they've got going on with the set. Keaton was decent and Nicholson a redeemer, but I maintain there was a negligible storyline and the poor pacing results in a film that is not engaging.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

3

Batman97Jun 18, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What the hell is this, this barely has anything to do with the comic first off Batman dosent kill people, second Joker disnt kill Batman's parents that is stupid… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

FilipeNetoFeb 17, 2018

This movie is the film adaptation of the comic-strip where Batman was born. Directed by Tim Burton (who became famous at this time thanks to this film and "Edward Scissorhands"), has Michael Keaton (in the title role) and Jack Nicholson (asThis movie is the film adaptation of the comic-strip where Batman was born. Directed by Tim Burton (who became famous at this time thanks to this film and "Edward Scissorhands"), has Michael Keaton (in the title role) and Jack Nicholson (as the villain Joker) among others talented actors. But in this movie the actors weren't well, they simply failed to adapt to the way Tim Burton, a sui generis director, wanted the film.

In fact, in this film (and in the following sequels), Tim Burton has shown that knows nothing about comics, and his love for his personal way he understands cinema is greater than his ability to adapt comic strip for cinema. Merely copying one thing to another?! A film that is comic-strip is not a movie nor a comic-book! The interpretation of the characters is too stylized, the costumes are too unrealistic, the cinematography is too dark and the absurd scenarios are worthy of an Orwellian dystopia. Everything has been thought to refer the public to the comics and strengthen the dystopian character of the city where the story takes place. Thus, as in the comics, Batman is the product of reality where he lives: a good and noble man who uses the violence to brings justice where it fails, turning perversity against the perversity he fights. Still, it's a comic-book Batman, not a cinema Batman, and the film doesn't even tries to bridge's the gap between reality and comics, something that surely would make the film more interesting.

Mr. Burton, who want a comic-book buys it, who is going to the movies normally expects to see something different...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

MindurbidnissAug 28, 2021

Garbage. Tim Burton just making another "Tim Burtonv film, not a Batman film.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

1

scorpius952Jun 5, 2012

I was 15 when I heard they were making a Batman movie. I couldn't wait. I went out and bought all of these Batman comics to prepare myself for this monumental occasion. Then the news starting pouring in. Tim Burton was directing.I was 15 when I heard they were making a Batman movie. I couldn't wait. I went out and bought all of these Batman comics to prepare myself for this monumental occasion. Then the news starting pouring in. Tim Burton was directing. REALLY??? The director of Beetlejuice was directing??? Then came the announcement of Michael (Mr. Mom) Keaton as Batman. WHAT??? Are you **** kidding me? It just got worse from there, but as a kid, I still had to see this for myself. I was there at the first showing with the rest of the poor suckers hoping to see a good superhero movie. Boy were we wrong. Wrong in the worst way. There is no way that someone can do this much stupid by accident! The acting was atrocious, no story, the worst Joker of all time, a rubber Batman costume, a city painted black, and a director that didn't seem to give even one **** about what he was doing and how many people he was hurting. The only way anyone could possibly like this movie is if they are legally retarded, or this is the fist movie that anyone has ever seen!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

1

Cayton32Feb 21, 2014

So I watched this the other night having never seen the original batman movie by Tim Burton. I heard arguments from people that it was better than the Dark Knight Trilogy created by Christopher Nolan. Um....might be one of the worstSo I watched this the other night having never seen the original batman movie by Tim Burton. I heard arguments from people that it was better than the Dark Knight Trilogy created by Christopher Nolan. Um....might be one of the worst incarnations of the Caped Crusader ever made. First off, there is a major problem with michael keaton as batman. This fool was wearing glasses as bruce wayne, had kinda of curly hair and had absolutely no suave of any kind. I was trying to figure out if this guy was supposed to be a grown up peter parker or something instead of bruce wayne. But the bigger problem is Jack Nicholson as the Joker. You friken kidding me? Joker has always bean kinda of lean and skinny. Nicholson had too broad of shoulders to sell as the Joker. Didn't have the voice, didn't have the look, and minimized the craziness of the Joker. And the biggest flaw in the whole movie was that they changed Batmans orgin story of who killed his parents. A common thug kills his parents in the allyway. But not in this movie. Instead it was friken Joker when he was younger. Joker? Bullcrap man. And batman doesn't realize until near the end of the movie. The man who killed my parents was the Joker! Okay Tim Burton. Thanks for killing my fascination with batman.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

papa_miguelJan 22, 2012

What do people see in this movie? I saw it when it came out when I was a little kid and hated it. Now that I'm an adult, I thought that perhaps I didn't have the ability to appreciate whatever it was that people loved about this movie, so IWhat do people see in this movie? I saw it when it came out when I was a little kid and hated it. Now that I'm an adult, I thought that perhaps I didn't have the ability to appreciate whatever it was that people loved about this movie, so I watched it again. And I still hate it, LOL. I don't know where to begin, frankly, because every aspect of this movie, from the completely unfaithful representation of the comic book characters to the cringingly awkward dialogue and perplexing moment to moment decisions to the stiff and contrived flow of action, made this one of the biggest wastes of time I've spent in a while. I just finished watching the scene where Bruce Wayne confronts the joker in Vicki Vale's apartment. Oh yeah, you fanboys know what I'm talking about and every one of you knows when you saw that scene even your reaction was, "And Bruce Wayne did that because....?". That reaction pretty much sums up my sentiments for almost every character in every scene in the entire movie. Don't waste your time with this movie. The new Chris Nolan ones are at least compelling and rational, even if they aren't completely adherent to the comic book themes. Stick with them and may this movie be buried for eternity at the bottom of the $5 DVD bin at your local Walmart!… Expand

2 of 28 users found this helpful226

All this user's reviews

Batman

User Reviews