Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: June 23, 1989
8.1
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 944 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
821
Mixed:
73
Negative:
50
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
MovieLonely94Oct 30, 2010
best Michael Keaton movie ever!
26 of 28 users found this helpful262
All this user's reviews
9
Edmundo6190Jul 17, 2012
By no means is this is a
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
8
dharmaAug 29, 2012
The blockbuster that started it all. It may not be the first superhero film, but it sure was the first that was a genuine phenomenon. So much so that it eclipsed the movie itself. The T Shirt with the BAT symbol...the PrinceThe blockbuster that started it all. It may not be the first superhero film, but it sure was the first that was a genuine phenomenon. So much so that it eclipsed the movie itself. The T Shirt with the BAT symbol...the Prince soundtrack...the endless merchandise. How about the movie itself? It always was an unconventional film, from its choice of male cast (comedian Michael Keaton) to its Blade Runner influenced Art Design.Yes.. the narrative took strange turns, the fighting scene looked really stiff. But the spectacle is still present, two decades after its release. While the Nolan trilogy brought the Dark Knight to the 21st century, Tim Burton's version was the first super hero film that showed the true potential of the genre. Not the best, but still pretty great stuff. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
10
12hilbkeJul 30, 2013
Due to its' creativity, fantastic story and characters, Tim Burton's Batman is a fantastic superhero movie that I will never get tired of, and, in my opinion, Tim Burton's masterpiece.
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
10
TheDude-Aug 3, 2015
Batman is still one of the best superhero films ever made it has a perfect cast with some sweet visuals and action sequences and an iconic performance from jack Nicholson as the joker and Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne/Batman definitely one ofBatman is still one of the best superhero films ever made it has a perfect cast with some sweet visuals and action sequences and an iconic performance from jack Nicholson as the joker and Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne/Batman definitely one of my personal favourite movies!. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
9
tontoJun 24, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This was the first big budget Hollywood production of a live-action Batman movie not including the serial from the 1940’s or the campy movie from the 1960’s starring Adam West. It is presented as a darker story than the original comic series, as the Batman comics were starting to explore more mature themes in the 1970’s and 1980’s with graphic novels such as The Killling Joke and The Dark Knight Returns. The film is set in the fictional Gotham city, which is constructed using visual effects for the film. The city is a cool setting, with gothic architecture and towering skyscrapers and bustling city life with traffic, hookers and panhandlers. There is a good tone-setting scene at the start of movie where Batman confronts a couple of thugs who mug a family in a sketchy part of town. At the start of the movie, Batman is a mysterious vigilante who little is known about and kind of seen as a urban legend. He hasn’t started his relationship with Commissioner Gordon yet. Beautiful blonde photographer meets billionaire playboy and philanthropist owner of Wayne Enterprises Bruce Wayne at a party at Bruce’s mansion and tells him she is trying to get pictures of Batman for the Gotham Times. She and Bruce start dating and sleep together, little does she know that he is the caped crusader himself. Meanwhile, mobster Jack Napier, a wise-cracking goon who is having an affair with Mafia Boss Grissom’s young mistress is set up to break into Axis Chemicals, a factory that has ties to the mob, just to be confronted by dirty cop Lieutenant Eckart and his police squad, based on Harvey Bullock from the comics. Napier kills Eckart and almost manages to escape, but is apprehended by Batman who ends up making him fall into a vat of chemicals or acid although he tries to save Napier. Napier survives this and is left at a cheap emergency clinic where the doctor does surgery on him to get rid of the damage done by the chemicals. The procedure was done so poorly that it result in Jack Napier having something that looks like a permanent grin on his face. Also, now Jack’s hair is green, his lips are ruby red, and his skin is bleached white. He looks like a clown. In despair after he sees his reflection, Napier begins to laugh maniacally in a chilling scene at the clinic and leaves to cause mayhem. He starts calling himself the Joker, kills Boss Grissom, and takes over the mob. Joker utilizes weaponized clown props such as an electrocuting joy buzzer, an acid spraying flower, a spring-loaded boxing glove, and guns that he can stretch into hand-canons which also sometimes just eject a flag that says “bang.” The rest of the movie is pretty much just the Joker causing mayhem and Batman preventing it. Vicki Vale learns that Bruce Wayne is Batman by the end of the movie and she chooses to stay with him. Batman also learns that Jack Napier was the true killer of his parents when he was a child ( as opposed to Joe Chill like in the comics) and makes the connection to the Joker. He stops the Joker from attempting to gas the city streets with Smilex gas, which causes people to start laughing uncontrollably and die laughing and then kills the Joker. I liked the movie’s depictions of Bruce Wayne and his alter ego Batman, Joker, Alfred, and Vicki Vale. It was good how they actually established that the Joker was proficient in chemistry as he is in the comics, and the Joker was funny in the movie often making quips and saying punchlines. The Joker’s origin was similar to his origin in the comics as the Red Hood, although the film took some liberties in making him a mobster named “Jack Napier.” Sometimes in the comics, when Joker’s real name from his past is alluded to it is “Jack.” Michael Keaton’s performance as Batman is probably my favorite out of all the Batmen I have seen in the movies, as he doesn’t go too over the top but still manages to seem imposing. A classic, this might be my favorite Batman movie other than maybe The Dark Knight from 2008 which incidentally also stars the Joker. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
BrianMcCriticJun 22, 2013
The first time that Batman is seen on screen in this way leads to a darkly funny comic book film. Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson give good performances and Tim Burton continued a solid early career.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
akus_1985Feb 15, 2017
Nostalgia can be a very powerful thing. I admit that. This was the first VHS I ever owned as a child, and I remember it very fondly, even the preceding Warner Brothers ad starring Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck. I have re-watched Tim Burton'sNostalgia can be a very powerful thing. I admit that. This was the first VHS I ever owned as a child, and I remember it very fondly, even the preceding Warner Brothers ad starring Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck. I have re-watched Tim Burton's 1989 adaptation of Batman several times, and even after re-evaluating the film as an adult, I still believe it to be the best Batman film to date. I was too young to comprehend or care about the controversy surrounding the casting of Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne, or Nicholson working out a deal regarding the movie's profits. I didn't care about any of that. And honestly, I still don't. This is simply one of my favorite comic book movies of all time that I rarely tire of watching. The tone is dark and brooding, which is a far cry from the campy Batman television show/movie that came before it, starring Adam West. The story is quite grim, and Gotham City is a bleak, crime-infested place that is visually accentuated with hues of black and grey, a lot of grey. Nicholson and Keaton play their parts very well, with Nicholson being the stand out as Joker. The supporting cast is also stellar, particularly Kim Basigner, as the determined photojournalist who is investigating Batman. The plot is straightforward, and the pace is good, if somewhat slow. But the action scenes are amazing, and are all accentuated with Danny Elfman's brilliant score, which sets the mood perfectly throughout the film. Director Tim Burton did an extraordinary job with this movie, and as terrific as his sequel Batman Returns is, Tim Burton's first attempt at Batman was his best. There's not much to dislike here. Even though Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight Trilogy was better received critically and by fans, I never cared for it that much. For me, Batman 1989 is the only Batman movie I'll ever need. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
DK_AbleJul 9, 2017
This is the first great super hero film. It holds up very well even approaching 30 years into the future. It also introduced the world to Batman the way he is meant to be seen: a creature of the night, fighting against dark, twistedThis is the first great super hero film. It holds up very well even approaching 30 years into the future. It also introduced the world to Batman the way he is meant to be seen: a creature of the night, fighting against dark, twisted characters.
Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson deliver flawless performances, creating the iconic Batman/Joker cinematic rivalry.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
NolanLundgaardJun 30, 2018
I was blown away by the storyline and the amazing acting by all the actors in this film, especially from Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson. I happily give this film full points. Much better than the Adam West 1966 Batman. Definitely exceededI was blown away by the storyline and the amazing acting by all the actors in this film, especially from Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson. I happily give this film full points. Much better than the Adam West 1966 Batman. Definitely exceeded my expectations. I highly recommend Batman. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
OriginalDangerJun 30, 2020
Tim Burton's BATMAN was made in 1989 by Tim Burton obviously and stars Jack Nicholson, Kim Basinger, Jack Palance and Michael Keaton..... Jack Palance in Batman looks the same as he does in Tango & Cash and his performance is quite similarTim Burton's BATMAN was made in 1989 by Tim Burton obviously and stars Jack Nicholson, Kim Basinger, Jack Palance and Michael Keaton..... Jack Palance in Batman looks the same as he does in Tango & Cash and his performance is quite similar and he's not a great actor but his character in the movie worked... Batman for a 1989 film is cleverly directed and made and some of the film is pretty dark, some of the villains are laughable like Joker's troops because they seem a bit sloppy and not up to standards, as far as Jack Nicholson's role as the Joker was concerned he did a great job and certainly the best movie villain ever... Batman is full of great stunts, chases, shootings, fights, explosions and twists and turns that keep the viewer entertained from start to finish. The acting overall is pretty good and some scenes are hilarious like Bob the goon who works for the Joker because he gets asked by the Joker for his gun then the Joker kills him so some of the Joker's men are a bit dumb bit still a classic and a masterpiece of film making by Tim Burton... The action scenes are excellent and the story is okay so I've no negatives really to say about the movie because it's near perfect for me. The best Batman film ever made and that will never change. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
geewahJan 26, 2021
The first of the dark, brooding superhero movies.
Tim Burton's gothic tone, with just a touch of camp, combine beautifully in this classic.
One of 1989's best movies.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
MATMApr 22, 2021
“Batman” is such a great movie movie. Every scene is iconic. I wish I knew the secret for pulling this Tim Burton out for every project, but, alas, the world will forever have to take its chances, never knowing until too late if they will“Batman” is such a great movie movie. Every scene is iconic. I wish I knew the secret for pulling this Tim Burton out for every project, but, alas, the world will forever have to take its chances, never knowing until too late if they will get the “Batman” Burton or the “Mars Attacks” one. I give it an A, make a point to go see this movie. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
FranzHcriticJun 28, 2014
Adapts the comic book to the screen in a very dark, almost ghoulish (Tim Burton) style, that remains relatively faithful to the basis of the comics. Jack Nicholson is the iconic Joker, though he is out-acted by Heath Ledger. Michael KeatonAdapts the comic book to the screen in a very dark, almost ghoulish (Tim Burton) style, that remains relatively faithful to the basis of the comics. Jack Nicholson is the iconic Joker, though he is out-acted by Heath Ledger. Michael Keaton proves by far the better Batman than any other Bruce Wayne's (Clooney, this is directed towards you). The story keeps you interested, and the ending doesn't disappoint. Two on the list of best Batman movies. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
Kai82Aug 15, 2021
This was for a long time the definitive Batman movie until “The Dark Knight” took the crown. It was dark, matured and had a good cast atop on director Tim Burton. Strangely it was the first Batman movie since “Batman The Movie” from 1966 withThis was for a long time the definitive Batman movie until “The Dark Knight” took the crown. It was dark, matured and had a good cast atop on director Tim Burton. Strangely it was the first Batman movie since “Batman The Movie” from 1966 with Adam West. Compared to the lighter and humorous setting of the 1966 movie this is much darker and a grim representation of Gotham City, Batman and society. I don't think I need to introduce Batman as anybody has heard of him even people who never read the comics. He is probably the most famous superhero and also commercially successful. This movie does tell the beginnings of Batman and the Joker with all struggles. Batman is just a rumor at the beginning and the Joker just Jack Napier a criminal on his way to the top of the food chain. The story works well for its genre while the characters and visuals enhance the experience. I should also say that this movie did not shy away from showing some drastic things for its time and age rating. I was impressed by this and a bit shocked back then. The characters did their best and Michael Keaton was a surprisingly good Batman aka Bruce Wayne. I did not think he could pull this off but he surprised me positively. As fun fact Bill Murray was a candidate for this role too and this would be the stuff of legends ;-). Many say Batmans strength is the best villains gallery in fiction and I agree. It is only natural to pick the Joker for this. Jack Nicholson is just amazing as Joker / Jack Napier. He is crazy, scary and insanely intimidating. He was the definitive Joker for a long time too and I can even understand those who still think he is the best. Then we have Viki Vale who is a photographer who is drawn into the struggles when she does an investigation about a rumor of a crime fighter in a bat costume. She delivers a good performance and I was invested in her character. Other than those I always love to see Billy Dee Williams and Michael Gough is a good Alfred Pennyworth. Side note: Alfred is probably the greatest bad ass in the Batman family. Just look up the one time he beat up Superman or escaped captivity with Bane who immediately recolonized his potential (Both examples are no jokes and really happened). In total we got a good cast and well done performance by genre standards. Jack Nicholson's performance was quite famous and left an impact here. Presentation wise the movie creates a dark atmosphere. Gotham City is a grim place, run down and a fine mixture of former greatness and decay. The costumes and practical effects work well. The Joker make up / mask alone is incredibly good. I must praise Tim Burton here as director. He made a really good movie with a clear vision. Of cause Danny Elfman made a good soundtrack that enhances the atmosphere and still works well. The rest was history as this movie was financially successful, impressed fans and most critiques and laid the foundation for the next movies. Overall I think this movie holds up well enough to recommend it. The Dark Knight took the crown but this was the gold standard before. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
MrMovieBuffMar 29, 2016
'Batman' is a movie that's seen many times, and while it certainly is a classic, it does have its flaws, mostly in the central characters.

The movie stars Jack Nicholson as the Joker, and Michael Keaton as the title character. Yes, it is
'Batman' is a movie that's seen many times, and while it certainly is a classic, it does have its flaws, mostly in the central characters.

The movie stars Jack Nicholson as the Joker, and Michael Keaton as the title character. Yes, it is in that order as well. Directed by Tim Burton, the movie has his own unique style with colorful characters and a darker, gloomy tone to avoid the camp-style of the Adam West "Batman" from the 1960s.

The plot revolves around Batman trying to catch the Joker from injecting Gotham city with crime, and exposing the citizens to some Smile gas which incidentally transforms the people into what the Joker has become. The Joker became the crazy maniac that he is after he fell into a pool of acid which disfigures his face to form a permanent grin. Nicholson gives a great performance as the crazy Joker, but having seen the movie recently, it almost seems as if he might be over-acting his role. The loud, maniac laughs and the over-the-top delivery of some of his lines can seem a little problematic.

But this is in no way Nicholson's fault, like I said, he did a fantastic job in the role... Director Tim Burton has been known for animating his characters on screen. Not just with the pale face make-up, but possibly how he tells his actors to deliver their lines. A huge part of the Joker's performance is obviously influenced by Tim Burton's vision.

Michael Keaton is great as Bruce Wayne/Batman, but we don't delve that deep into his character. It has been said many times by other critics that this is Jack Nicholson's movie, and not Keaton's. This is true, we get more of a Joker origin story rather than the title character. This may be due to the fact that the screenplay, written by Sam Hamm and Warren Skaaren were so focused heavily on creating such an iconic villain, that they got lost in translation and forgot who the movie was for in the first place.

Other than this, 'Batman' is a visual treat, a thrilling adaptation of the Caped Crusader of Gotham city, it does feel a little jarring that we get a glimpse of Bruce's childhood/origin story almost half way through the movie, but, when you have fun with what Burton presents you with, it's hard to stay mad.

Overall, if you want a good Batman movie, this will deliver what you might want. The actors' performances outshine the overall story.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
kyle20ellisMar 14, 2022
The only reason why I didn't give this a 10, was that the film itself is a bit too long. But putting that discrepancy aside, this is still a solid and sophisticated film, that is undoubtedly one of Tim Burton's better film efforts along withThe only reason why I didn't give this a 10, was that the film itself is a bit too long. But putting that discrepancy aside, this is still a solid and sophisticated film, that is undoubtedly one of Tim Burton's better film efforts along with Edward Scissorhands and Corpse Bride.

The cinematography was spellbinding. The view of Gotham City from the air was brilliantly shot and very well realised. The music by Danny Elfman perfectly matched the cinematography, as that was outstanding. I also liked the mixture of darkness and tragedy wrought into the characters, as is so typical of Burton.

As for the acting, that was equally outstanding. I couldn't think of a better cast for this type of film. Michael Keaten was suitably brooding as Batman, and Kim Basinger matched him wonderfully in an innocent but sophisticated role as Vicki Vale. However, it is Jack Nicolson's mind-blowing performance as the rather sadistic joker that holds this film together. If I have to decide who was better as the joker between Jack Nicolson and Heath Ledger, it would be an extremely close call, but Jack Nicolson for me. He was both scary and comical, which reminded me of Tim Curry's(who was 2nd choice for the role of the Joker) Pennywise in It.

The direction by Burton was tight, and he assured us that the high-tension of this film rarely slipped. In conclusion, a must-see if you love sophisticated and dark films, with a touch of edge, because this film has plenty of that. 9.5/10 Bethany Cox
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
gameguardian21Mar 20, 2016
While not as good as the dark knight trilogy, this is still the batman movie fans have wanted, well in the 80"s. With a great cast, story, and entertainment, this is one batman fans should not miss.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
TheMoeJan 4, 2017
A legendary achievement of making Batman dark on screen. Well done by Tim Burton. Michael Keaton was a great Batman and Jack Nicholson killed it as the Joker. Amazing dynamic between the two in this class movie. It is a stunning masterpiece.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
JPKMay 19, 2018
I'm Batman
This Is A Great Take On The Caped Crusader With Terrific Performances From The Cast.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
MrPajamasSep 9, 2020
Batman's 1989 role as Michael Keaton is an excellent film. The story is excellent and the action scenes are also surprisingly very well filmed at the time. The very best thing about the film is the atmosphere, which was a success here, andBatman's 1989 role as Michael Keaton is an excellent film. The story is excellent and the action scenes are also surprisingly very well filmed at the time. The very best thing about the film is the atmosphere, which was a success here, and overall it's an excellent Batman film, and if you're a DC fanboy, you have to see this. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
noob328Dec 8, 2020
this film was really good for it's time. the music is iconic and Nicholson's peformance was one of the best
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
d0chasDec 14, 2020
Michael Keaton'ın muhteşem oyunculuğu, yılına göre görselliğiyle düşünüldüğünde bugün bile izlenebilecek ve keyif verecek bir film. Bugünün CGI şartlarını tabi ki sağlayamaz ama çok sevdiğim bir Batman filmidir.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
TheIrishmanJan 29, 2022
This movie is the best Batman solo movie so far. Michael Keaton as Batman and Jack Nelson as the Joker shine. The film is very loyal to the originals and the characters are excellent. The duality of Batman and Bruce Wayne is best illustrated.This movie is the best Batman solo movie so far. Michael Keaton as Batman and Jack Nelson as the Joker shine. The film is very loyal to the originals and the characters are excellent. The duality of Batman and Bruce Wayne is best illustrated. One of the points that bothers you in the film is the comic part: Why does Batman know about the identity of the Joker? Why was it the Joker who killed Bruce's parents? These twists were very extra. In general, Batman 1989 is an action, enigmatic and very attractive film that creates a very pleasant atmosphere of the film and a lot of symbolic scenes. Tim Burton Tosente shows a fascinating world of Batman in his own style, which ends in a fascinating ending. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
DunkaccinoFeb 3, 2022
This is a very dark Batman film. I mean it literally. It has one of the most atmospheric settings in the dark and gritty Gotham city. It's a truly immersive atmosphere done well by director Tim Burton. This is a superhero film in 1989 thatThis is a very dark Batman film. I mean it literally. It has one of the most atmospheric settings in the dark and gritty Gotham city. It's a truly immersive atmosphere done well by director Tim Burton. This is a superhero film in 1989 that still holds up. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
grandpajoe6191Sep 18, 2011
What makes "Batman" impressive is the unpredictable creativity and live art director Tim Burton mixes in with the original idea. Very impressive and well made.
11 of 12 users found this helpful111
All this user's reviews
10
TylerDurden900Jul 9, 2014
Nicholson and Keaton are excellent in Batman. The action is very cool and all the cast fit their characters.
Keaton should've stayed with the Batman franchise but he dropped out of it after the sequel. Batman
is one of smartest comic book
Nicholson and Keaton are excellent in Batman. The action is very cool and all the cast fit their characters.
Keaton should've stayed with the Batman franchise but he dropped out of it after the sequel. Batman
is one of smartest comic book movies ever made.
Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
4
crstfrFeb 1, 2011
Perhaps it is because I saw the Nolan films first but I was unimpressed with the lack of plot and the mix and match thing they've got going on with the set. Keaton was decent and Nicholson a redeemer, but I maintain there was a negligiblePerhaps it is because I saw the Nolan films first but I was unimpressed with the lack of plot and the mix and match thing they've got going on with the set. Keaton was decent and Nicholson a redeemer, but I maintain there was a negligible storyline and the poor pacing results in a film that is not engaging. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
10
Steven1981Mar 20, 2020
Quite simply the best Batman movie ever made, the sequels were not great except Batman Forever which was pretty good.... Tim Burton's original batman movie made in 1989 mixes violence with humour which works. Batman is a good film and MichaelQuite simply the best Batman movie ever made, the sequels were not great except Batman Forever which was pretty good.... Tim Burton's original batman movie made in 1989 mixes violence with humour which works. Batman is a good film and Michael Keaton as the caped crusader is good and Jack Nicholson is excellent as the perfect villain (The Joker). Batman contains some of the best action scenes ever made and is pure genius! Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
1
scorpius952Jun 5, 2012
I was 15 when I heard they were making a Batman movie. I couldn't wait. I went out and bought all of these Batman comics to prepare myself for this monumental occasion. Then the news starting pouring in. Tim Burton was directing.I was 15 when I heard they were making a Batman movie. I couldn't wait. I went out and bought all of these Batman comics to prepare myself for this monumental occasion. Then the news starting pouring in. Tim Burton was directing. REALLY??? The director of Beetlejuice was directing??? Then came the announcement of Michael (Mr. Mom) Keaton as Batman. WHAT??? Are you **** kidding me? It just got worse from there, but as a kid, I still had to see this for myself. I was there at the first showing with the rest of the poor suckers hoping to see a good superhero movie. Boy were we wrong. Wrong in the worst way. There is no way that someone can do this much stupid by accident! The acting was atrocious, no story, the worst Joker of all time, a rubber Batman costume, a city painted black, and a director that didn't seem to give even one **** about what he was doing and how many people he was hurting. The only way anyone could possibly like this movie is if they are legally retarded, or this is the fist movie that anyone has ever seen! Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
10
DeepakG.Apr 5, 2007
Definitely one of the best looking action films of ALL time. Tim burton is god.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
4
RirenJan 30, 2007
Good for children and little more, Tim Burton's vision of Gotham is underwhelming. Every set is either boring or art designed to death. The score is legendary, but can't save the wooden acting of all but one cast member - Jack Good for children and little more, Tim Burton's vision of Gotham is underwhelming. Every set is either boring or art designed to death. The score is legendary, but can't save the wooden acting of all but one cast member - Jack Nicholson, who turns in an all-time great performance as the villain, the Joker. He gleefully steals every scene he's in, and thank goodness for him. The action is overwrought and cloying. Worse, several of its plot decisions (no spoilers here) became cliches that ruined several other franchises, including this one. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
10
MichaelJul 16, 2008
The best (numero uno) superhero movie of all time. Mops the floor with Batman Begins a thousand times over. Will never be topped.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
9
LukeTJul 18, 2007
Having seen this on AMC and just bought it on DVD, i can say with some certainty that this is one of the best superhero movies I've ever seen. Jack as the Joker is deliciously evil (could have done without the Prince music though) and Having seen this on AMC and just bought it on DVD, i can say with some certainty that this is one of the best superhero movies I've ever seen. Jack as the Joker is deliciously evil (could have done without the Prince music though) and Keaton captures the psychological pain of Bruce/Batman. I gave this the same rating I gave to Batman Begins because both EXCEL with strong performances and the serious atmosphere of Gotham. However, it looks increasingly that The Dark Knight will surpass both with an even better cast and a truly menacing-looking Joker (played by Heath Ledger). May Nolan continue to build on the seriousness and quality of, not only Batman Begins, but also Burton's (while maintaining his own style). Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
9
TheNewSpielbergApr 1, 2011
The most successful outing of the Caped Crusader before the 2007 smash hit Dark Knight, the 1989 Tim Burton version offers a straight up comic book movie with a crap load of action, explosions and overall mayhem. Michael Keaton stars as BruceThe most successful outing of the Caped Crusader before the 2007 smash hit Dark Knight, the 1989 Tim Burton version offers a straight up comic book movie with a crap load of action, explosions and overall mayhem. Michael Keaton stars as Bruce Wayne, a sly and unassuming businessman who by day deals with documents and contracts and who by night is a one man army, stopping crimes all over Gotham City. He forms a relationship with photojournalist Vicki Vale, played sexily by Kim Basinger, who wants to write a story about the Batman legend and crack the truth once and for all. Meanwhile, a citywide spree of madness and murder is being perpetrated by The Joker, played excellently by Jack Nicholson who is perfect for the role. Quite simply, when it comes to portraying crazy people, he is THE best. As mentioned before, the movie was in the hands of extraordinary artist Tim Burton, four years after his big screen debut with the 1985 comedy Pee-Wee's Big Adventure. The movie looks great, and the DVD quality is top-notch for a movie that is nearly 25 years old. I have to say, this movie in particular is the best looking action movie I have ever had the pleasure of seeing. However, the film does have some flaws, my biggest complaint being a sometimes cheesy soundtrack (Prince). In sum, a truly great film experience that all fans of the genre should check it out. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
ThatCooperGuyJun 25, 2015
While Jack Nicholson is entertaining, he takes much more screen time than, well, Batman. The story isn't as great and there are a few points where the tone can be a bit jumpy.
However, Michael Keaton made a great Batman, the cinematography
While Jack Nicholson is entertaining, he takes much more screen time than, well, Batman. The story isn't as great and there are a few points where the tone can be a bit jumpy.
However, Michael Keaton made a great Batman, the cinematography and art design are both beautiful, and the score by Danny Elfman is amazing.
It's a flawed, but satisfying superhero movie.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
RedrealJul 17, 2019
Brilliant movie, made in different more innocent time. Tim Burton's unique style works perfectly with Batman. Jack Nicholson is still one of best Joker's ever and Michael Keaton as Batman even though as a kid i thought it was odd choice hasBrilliant movie, made in different more innocent time. Tim Burton's unique style works perfectly with Batman. Jack Nicholson is still one of best Joker's ever and Michael Keaton as Batman even though as a kid i thought it was odd choice has turned out to be one of the best actors to ever don the mantle of Batman. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
JacobOct 26, 2014
Batman is good. Its hard for me to love this movie given that I’ve seen the later and superior versions of Batman and have been spoiled by so many comic book movies but I appreciate for what it is. This comes from a time when comic bookBatman is good. Its hard for me to love this movie given that I’ve seen the later and superior versions of Batman and have been spoiled by so many comic book movies but I appreciate for what it is. This comes from a time when comic book movies were not that common and if they did exist they weren’t taken as seriously as they are today. The fact that a dark comic book movie came out that was good was a big deal and the film did lay the groundwork for future comicbook movies and later versions of the character that I love specifically Batman: The Animated Series as well as the Nolan films. What makes this film entertaining are the characters primarily the Joker with Jack Nicholson giving an excellent performance. If this is your introduction to Batman you’ll probably love this movie but if not you won’t be blown away by it but it is still entertaining. Had this been my first time seeing Batman I would’ve probably really enjoyed it but instead its entertaining. As it is I enjoy the movie and appreciate what it did for comicbook movies. Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
papa_miguelJan 22, 2012
What do people see in this movie? I saw it when it came out when I was a little kid and hated it. Now that I'm an adult, I thought that perhaps I didn't have the ability to appreciate whatever it was that people loved about this movie, so IWhat do people see in this movie? I saw it when it came out when I was a little kid and hated it. Now that I'm an adult, I thought that perhaps I didn't have the ability to appreciate whatever it was that people loved about this movie, so I watched it again. And I still hate it, LOL. I don't know where to begin, frankly, because every aspect of this movie, from the completely unfaithful representation of the comic book characters to the cringingly awkward dialogue and perplexing moment to moment decisions to the stiff and contrived flow of action, made this one of the biggest wastes of time I've spent in a while. I just finished watching the scene where Bruce Wayne confronts the joker in Vicki Vale's apartment. Oh yeah, you fanboys know what I'm talking about and every one of you knows when you saw that scene even your reaction was, "And Bruce Wayne did that because....?". That reaction pretty much sums up my sentiments for almost every character in every scene in the entire movie. Don't waste your time with this movie. The new Chris Nolan ones are at least compelling and rational, even if they aren't completely adherent to the comic book themes. Stick with them and may this movie be buried for eternity at the bottom of the $5 DVD bin at your local Walmart! Expand
2 of 28 users found this helpful226
All this user's reviews
10
SamOct 7, 2005
A fantastic film, with an interesting plot, and the joker has some laughs, but the sad part is, it's only third best in terms of the top (and only) 5 Batman movies. Here, I'll give you the Batman movies in order of the best to the A fantastic film, with an interesting plot, and the joker has some laughs, but the sad part is, it's only third best in terms of the top (and only) 5 Batman movies. Here, I'll give you the Batman movies in order of the best to the worst with the score I give them. 1. Batman Begins (10) 2. Batman Returns (10) 3. Batman (10) 4. Batman Forever (8) 5. Batman and Robin (3). However, I must agree on the fact that this movie does have a memorable line, "He stole my Baloons!" And, of course, who could forget the Joker's question that was answered in the other classic, Batman Begins? "Where does he get all those wonderful toys?" Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
HenryT.Dec 30, 2007
I love this film best batman film ever the joker's great and batman's great I don't like the new Dark knight film the joker looks terrible.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
6
DavidHJan 24, 2007
Decent, but it never quite comes together. Kim Basinger has no screen chemistry with Keaton, while the character arc is oversimplified by turning the Joker into a psychopath and while the visuals are impressive, they're not Decent, but it never quite comes together. Kim Basinger has no screen chemistry with Keaton, while the character arc is oversimplified by turning the Joker into a psychopath and while the visuals are impressive, they're not groundbreaking. Both of these points would be improved upon in Batman Returns. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
H.IdentityApr 23, 2007
This movie was probably the best superhero movie I've seen. Michael Keaton made the character of Batman a dark and menacing figure of the night which made him my favorite Batman of all time. And Jack Nicolson's portrayal of the This movie was probably the best superhero movie I've seen. Michael Keaton made the character of Batman a dark and menacing figure of the night which made him my favorite Batman of all time. And Jack Nicolson's portrayal of the Joker was creepy yet genius. I loved the movie all around. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
8
[Anonymous]Sep 22, 2007
First Batman doesn't have the personal moral resonance and depth of Batman begins. However, this films got another card to play...the brilliant Jack Nicholson cranks out the ultimate joker.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
ShockJul 8, 2008
This film and Batman Returns are the only films to actually explore the psychology of Batman. It doesn't rely on cliche characterization of the title character or heavy handed moralizing either - just a dark and brooding Batman.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
SamS.Oct 20, 2005
A masterpiece. It makes every other bat film that has come since then (with the exception of Burton's HIGHLY under rated Batman Returns) look sub-standered.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
Myles#13Sep 6, 2006
This is the superhero movie of our day and defined the genre. Burton delivered the Batman that Bob Kane envisioned when he first developed the character. Don't listen to the doubters... Michael Keaton IS Batman and Jack Nicholson IS the This is the superhero movie of our day and defined the genre. Burton delivered the Batman that Bob Kane envisioned when he first developed the character. Don't listen to the doubters... Michael Keaton IS Batman and Jack Nicholson IS the Joker- both actors are at the top of their game in this film. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
JaredB.Sep 25, 2007
I saw this movie when it first came out in 1989. To me, this is how action films are supposed to be done. Michael Keaton was a better Batman than even Adam West, and certainly better than Val Kilmer or George Clooney. Jack Nicholson was I saw this movie when it first came out in 1989. To me, this is how action films are supposed to be done. Michael Keaton was a better Batman than even Adam West, and certainly better than Val Kilmer or George Clooney. Jack Nicholson was perfect as the Joker. He was mean, menacing, and very, very funny. Kim Basinger made an absolutely beautiful Vicki Vale. Tim Burton's visual style is astounding. If you want an action-packed film with an uncomplicated plot, "Batman" is just what you are looking for. On a scale of 1-10, this movie rates a ten, only because the scale doesn't go to 11. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
RickFAug 4, 2008
The only film to still capture every essence of my imagination.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
8
FredB.Oct 21, 2006
This movie, for being so old, is nicely done. The cast of Keaton, Nicholson, and Basinger really bring the movie to life.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
8
DeVr33zAug 11, 2010
Not as good as Batman Begins, but a pretty great movie nonetheless. However, if Nicholson weren't there to steal the show from Keaton's dull Bruce Wayne, I would probably have given it a lower score.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
GUe1Feb 6, 2011
I watched this movie a couple of days ago after so many years and while Batman's stiffness in his movements kind of gets in the way, the movie is still as spectacular as ever, specially the musical score.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
TheQuietGamerFeb 14, 2011
The only flaw I can find with this movie is Micheal Keaton, his interpretation of Batman is poorly done, but Jack Nicholson's performance as The Joker easily makes up for this, he really shows the Joker for who he is, a psychotic prankster,The only flaw I can find with this movie is Micheal Keaton, his interpretation of Batman is poorly done, but Jack Nicholson's performance as The Joker easily makes up for this, he really shows the Joker for who he is, a psychotic prankster, all in all if you can put up with Keaton than you have yourself a great movie. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
asthobaskoroNov 3, 2012
Batman is both silly and thrilling at the same time. Fun adaptation on franchise entry, gothic, Tim Burton's style. There were nothing best Bruce Wayne and Batman, and there were no best Batman movie. Everyone has a style. Michael Keaton wasBatman is both silly and thrilling at the same time. Fun adaptation on franchise entry, gothic, Tim Burton's style. There were nothing best Bruce Wayne and Batman, and there were no best Batman movie. Everyone has a style. Michael Keaton was terrific. Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
9
HalfwelshmanFeb 27, 2012
Batman is a truly fine superhero film. It's not just that, though - most of the film more closely resembles an action-orientated film noir, and it has a finale that appears to have been taken straight out of a Gothic horror movie. MichaelBatman is a truly fine superhero film. It's not just that, though - most of the film more closely resembles an action-orientated film noir, and it has a finale that appears to have been taken straight out of a Gothic horror movie. Michael Keaton is the best film Batman, no question. While I can understand his casting raised a few eyebrows, but his portrayal of Bruce Wayne is very human and sincere, and very likeable, and his portrayal of the Dark Knight is unexpectedly effective, and highly influential (Christian Bale wasn't the first to adopt a different voice for the bat and the man). His successors never reach the heights Keaton does, with Val Kilmer being too camp and George Clooney being completely lifeless. Jack Nicholson's Joker makes for an extremely entertaining, scary villain. While he will now always be compared to Heath Ledger's Oscar-winning performance, you can't avoid the fact that they're very different roles. Ledger's Joker is uncontrollable and without any clear aim - he's a rabid dog. Nicholson's Joker is a sociopathic gangster with fame on his mind, is far more calculated and aware of what he is doing, and I personally find that far more scary. Like I say, they're different interpretations of the character, and impossible to rank one above the other. Kim Basinger's Vicki Vale makes a good damsel in distress, Michael Gough makes the perfect Alfred, and Jack Palance growls through his lines as another despicable villain, crime boss Carl Grissom. It's such a shame that Billy Dee Williams never got to play Two-Face (as he really wanted to) with his version of Harvey Dent being such an intriguing, ambiguous, image-obsessed character - he would have made a really memorable villain. Like all of Tim Burton's films, Batman is a visual feast, with Gotham city presented as a murky, industrial, crime-ridden dystopian metropolis, but with a striking ahistorical mix of architecture by designer Anton Furst. Appropriately enough for a film which is so influenced by Brazil in its design, the cinematographer is regular Terry Gilliam collaborator Roger Pratt, and his steady, measured filming style marries very well with Burton's dark, focused vision. As well as being a very engaging and well constructed superhero film and crime thriller, Batman has a surprising amount of comedy in it. This isn't the campy, pun-laden humour of the Schumacher Batman films - these are clever, self-aware jokes about social convention (the scene where Bruce Wayne is having a meal with Vicky Vale across a ridiculously long dining table before Wayne admits that he doesn't think he's ever been in this particular room of his vast mansion before is incredibly funny, helped no small measure by Keaton's impeccable comic timing) and the affectionate mockery of the ridiculousness of the source material (two thugs looking over an apparently unconscious Batman wonder who he is, but rather than immediately thinking to remove his mask, one suggests that they should "check his wallet"). The addition of humour adds a lot to the film, but never at the expense of story or character. Schumacher took this too far in his films, but Burton gets the balance between humour and seriousness just right. Finally, Danny Elfman's score is among the best of his career, providing a consistent moody and mysterious tone to the film, and creating a memorable hero theme to rival even John Williams' iconic theme for Superman. Batman is a truly great superhero film. So visually striking, it looks like it was torn straight out of the comic books it was based on, and the two most recognisable characters from those pages are brought wonderfully to life by Keaton and Nicholson. The film retains the tragedy and darkness of Batman as a character and the world he inhabits, but never gets carried away with it to the extent that the film becomes depressing. The addition of a liberal dose of humour is a welcome one, and it's nice to see a decent big budget superhero film confident enough to incorporate comedy into its story (something we have seen more of recently, with Iron Man and Thor). A great superhero film, a nice call-back to film noir and Gothic horror of classic Hollywood, and one of Mr Burton's very best - Batman really is rather fantastic. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleSep 17, 2016
Dripping with gooey 80s action movie goodness, Batman features Jack Nicholson unleashing his crazy on the world as the Joker. While the modern day films have decided that doom, gloom, and Henry Cavill brooding, are the ways to make aDripping with gooey 80s action movie goodness, Batman features Jack Nicholson unleashing his crazy on the world as the Joker. While the modern day films have decided that doom, gloom, and Henry Cavill brooding, are the ways to make a successful Batman movie, Tim Burton's version embraces the crazy. As with all Burton films, it can be wildly over-the-top at times, but never ceases to entertain as Batman (Michael Keaton) squares off with the Joker and has sex with Vicki Vale (Kim Basinger). Go get 'em, champ.

Far more entertaining than Zack Snyder's slop, Tim Burton ensures that in portraying the Joker's madness, he never loses sight of the key to all action: FUN. And boy oh boy is this one fun. Gloriously 1980s in its approach to action and fight sequences, the film's special effects and choreography may be a bit stilted and unseemly by today's standards, but were more than good for the time. Plus, they feel very in line with the comic books. From the set pieces to the costumes to the dialogue, Tim Burton's Batman feels like a comic book and this is why the film is ultimately so fun. It knows none of it is too serious, so it has fun with an outrageous premise, plot, and scenarios, as it knows what it is: a summer blockbuster adapted from a comic book that is made to please. This, of course, is not to imply it is not dark. It is far darker than, say, Marvel movies nowadays. However, it stops well short of the grim nature of the new DC adaptations.

Michael Keaton does a very good job in the lead role as Bruce Wayne/Batman, but the real star is Jack Nicholson. Crazy Jack rears his head yet again and has a blast with the absolutely nutso Joker/Jack Napier. From hardcore gangster to gleeful murderer, Nicholson does a killer job capturing the Joker and bringing him to life. He has been upstaged in more recent times by Heath Ledger, but this does nothing to diminish Nicholson's turn as the famed comic book villain. The costume design of the Joker is also stellar. The same goes for Batman with both of their "outfits" being well crafted and, honestly, how I often view the characters. Along a similar line, the production design is also killer. The scene in which the Batplane rains hellfire on the Joker and the scene on the cathedral both highlight this look. Not cartoonish, but decidedly comic book, which is perfect for this type of film.

With solid dialogue, fun action, a compelling plot that does not pertain to blowing up planet Earth (oh boy a throwback to the good old days), and good acting, Tim Burton's Batman features all of the wackiness one might expect from a Burton film (especially in the portrayal of the Joker), but is simply an incredibly well done comic book film that captures the fun, atmosphere, and look of a comic book.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
Compi24Nov 28, 2012
An excellently written and technically superb action film, featuring one of the greatest turns of the titular character by way of Michael Keaton.
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
3
Batman97Jun 18, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What the hell is this, this barely has anything to do with the comic first off Batman dosent kill people, second Joker disnt kill Batman's parents that is stupid Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
1
Cayton32Feb 21, 2014
So I watched this the other night having never seen the original batman movie by Tim Burton. I heard arguments from people that it was better than the Dark Knight Trilogy created by Christopher Nolan. Um....might be one of the worstSo I watched this the other night having never seen the original batman movie by Tim Burton. I heard arguments from people that it was better than the Dark Knight Trilogy created by Christopher Nolan. Um....might be one of the worst incarnations of the Caped Crusader ever made. First off, there is a major problem with michael keaton as batman. This fool was wearing glasses as bruce wayne, had kinda of curly hair and had absolutely no suave of any kind. I was trying to figure out if this guy was supposed to be a grown up peter parker or something instead of bruce wayne. But the bigger problem is Jack Nicholson as the Joker. You friken kidding me? Joker has always bean kinda of lean and skinny. Nicholson had too broad of shoulders to sell as the Joker. Didn't have the voice, didn't have the look, and minimized the craziness of the Joker. And the biggest flaw in the whole movie was that they changed Batmans orgin story of who killed his parents. A common thug kills his parents in the allyway. But not in this movie. Instead it was friken Joker when he was younger. Joker? Bullcrap man. And batman doesn't realize until near the end of the movie. The man who killed my parents was the Joker! Okay Tim Burton. Thanks for killing my fascination with batman. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
AaronWasserman2May 6, 2014
For its time Batman was a good comic book movie. but now watching it with an older eye, its not that good. Keaton is a good batman but not so much bruce. Nicholson kills it as the joker. and the score by danny elfman is the most memorial part
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
waronassermanMay 3, 2015
cool for its time! but now has gone down. Keaton is a great batman and Nicholson is a great joker and they both carry the movie. Tim burton nails the dark tone
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
8
22WZJan 12, 2018
Before 1989, super hero films where all bright costumes and chessy catchpharses. Now, i'm not saying that they were bad, but everything changed when Tim Burton's 'Batman' was released. The film was nothing short of a mile-stone in the superBefore 1989, super hero films where all bright costumes and chessy catchpharses. Now, i'm not saying that they were bad, but everything changed when Tim Burton's 'Batman' was released. The film was nothing short of a mile-stone in the super hero genre. Even today, the film holds up well. I will say that it isnt the best superhero movie, but if you have never seen it, i would suggest give it shot! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
MindurbidnissAug 28, 2021
Garbage. Tim Burton just making another "Tim Burtonv film, not a Batman film.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
MrNightOwlOct 28, 2019
This movie started a dark style of DC and it is an important part of today blockbuster films. Anyway, soundtrack by Elfman Is fantastic and Burton style is here on top. Keaton and Jack do fantastic job too. For 80s movies is this very bigThis movie started a dark style of DC and it is an important part of today blockbuster films. Anyway, soundtrack by Elfman Is fantastic and Burton style is here on top. Keaton and Jack do fantastic job too. For 80s movies is this very big blockbuster step. Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
10
Ascended333Oct 26, 2021
Batman is a perfect summertime fare. Its secret is levity hidden in a dark and troubled
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
TokyochuchuAug 5, 2012
Tim Burton's Batman might not pack the epic punch of the later Nolan incarnation of the dark knight, but it still stands as a thoroughly enjoyable Bat-romp. Silly and gothic in equal measure, the movie is buoyed by a charismatic performanceTim Burton's Batman might not pack the epic punch of the later Nolan incarnation of the dark knight, but it still stands as a thoroughly enjoyable Bat-romp. Silly and gothic in equal measure, the movie is buoyed by a charismatic performance from jack Nicholson, a rousing classic theme tune and the coolest batmobile to ever grace the screen. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Spielberg00Aug 28, 2011
We can express how clear it is that Christopher Nolan's take on Batman (a trilogy consisting of BATMAN BEGINS, THE DARK KNIGHT, and the upcoming THE DARK KNIGHT RISES) is much better than this. This 1989 edition of Batman is often cheesyWe can express how clear it is that Christopher Nolan's take on Batman (a trilogy consisting of BATMAN BEGINS, THE DARK KNIGHT, and the upcoming THE DARK KNIGHT RISES) is much better than this. This 1989 edition of Batman is often cheesy (though definitely not as much as BATMAN: THE MOVIE from 1966 or the 1960s television series it was based on), but otherwise thrilling, intriguing, and irresistibly intense. It is some of Tim Burton's very best work, though not his best collaboration with Michael Keaton (that would be BEETLEJUICE). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SlasherVoorheesAug 30, 2011
Batman is a Dark Film with great action sequences and good all around acting performances from Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson its a Classic Movie that will be marked in history as one of the most memorable Super Hero movies of All time
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
imthenoobFeb 1, 2020
It's certainly watchable but not without its flaws. There is too much focus on the Joker, not enough on Batman. There really isn't much character building and not once do you feel Batman is in danger or that any of his opponents are a threatIt's certainly watchable but not without its flaws. There is too much focus on the Joker, not enough on Batman. There really isn't much character building and not once do you feel Batman is in danger or that any of his opponents are a threat to him. And I felt that it totally falls apart in the last third of the movie. The ending was simply awful and highlights just how poorly written this movie was. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
PatrykGApr 25, 2014
Batman 1989 is my favourite superhero film, Michael Keaton is the best Batman because you never would have suspected that it's him, he as Bruce Wayne keeps all his troubles and worries inside not showing it when around other people, and whenBatman 1989 is my favourite superhero film, Michael Keaton is the best Batman because you never would have suspected that it's him, he as Bruce Wayne keeps all his troubles and worries inside not showing it when around other people, and when he is Batman he lets all that anger and hate out, then there is Jack Nicholson as the Joker he was the one who stole the whole movie and well he is the best movie Joker because he is funny and creepy. This is also by far the best superhero-villain relationship I've seen in a comic book movie, first of all Joker killed Batman's parents, if that doesn't make him his enemy than I don't know what will. The soundtrack is amazing and the last third of the movie is definitely the best part of the movie, you see the Batmobile, you see the Batwing, you see Joker, and Batman kicking ass. 10/10 Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
NecromusDec 29, 2012
This movie was alright and had some great actors in it but I think it is overrated. People say they like this movie because Tim Burton put a very dark spin on it, but personally I did not find it to be that dark. Maybe it is because it had aThis movie was alright and had some great actors in it but I think it is overrated. People say they like this movie because Tim Burton put a very dark spin on it, but personally I did not find it to be that dark. Maybe it is because it had a top-40 Artist (formerly known as? currently known as?) Prince doing the soundtrack along with a cheesy medley song with samples from the movie playing regularly on top 40 radio. Maybe it was because it was being promoted by fast-food franchises like McDonalds/Burger King (don't remember which). In any case it seemed really mainstream in many ways that a Tim Burton film usually isn't. It was, at least, definitely better than the 3rd and 4th sequels to come when the torch was passed to Joel Schumacher. Jack Nicholson has an interesting interpretation of The Joker. It is worth watching but overrated. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
btzneb92Aug 12, 2012
A film I adored as a kid, I was surprised to rewatch it now as a grown 20-year old, and coming out of it as not as great as I remembered it to be. The chess match between Batman and Joker is good, Jack Nicholson is great as the Joker, MichaelA film I adored as a kid, I was surprised to rewatch it now as a grown 20-year old, and coming out of it as not as great as I remembered it to be. The chess match between Batman and Joker is good, Jack Nicholson is great as the Joker, Michael Keaton actually made Batman a little scarier and more menacing than any other who played the character in the series, with some good production values, and damn the Prince songs were awesome. But other than that, this is a silly movie with an annoying damsel-in-distress, so many plotholes, and just a hot mess. It's still a good movie, but not as good as I remembered it to be, and definitely not as good as the Nolan films. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
gzayas91Jul 21, 2018
This is not my favorite Batman movie, but good popcorn movie that I can watch it any time. Keaton was okay, Nickolsan was great, the atmosphere was great, and decent story.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Skullgirlsfan13May 15, 2013
Probably one of my most nostalgic movie franchise was the batman series, from Tim Burton's original to even Batman and Robin. With that said, this one was one I never watched as much compared to the sequal. I just didn't get into it. WatchingProbably one of my most nostalgic movie franchise was the batman series, from Tim Burton's original to even Batman and Robin. With that said, this one was one I never watched as much compared to the sequal. I just didn't get into it. Watching it now I realize it's probably one of the best ones, in my opinion I like Batman returns more. I got this movie along with the next three in what's probably now called a box set, I watched all of them multiple times; I didn't know how bad the last one was, and enjoyed watching most of them. I guess I should start talking abut the movie now instead of how I got it, the best things in this movie are shown right in the opening. The score to this is now iconic, I think it's better than Nolan's score. It sets the mood, it gets exciting, and just feels so triumphant. The actors are a good choice as well. Michael Keaton is now famous for his role as Batman, giving a settle Bruce Wayne character and the bruting Batman. Jack Nicolson; I'm a big fan of his now, he gives a sorta hoakey performance. I mean, he's not at all scary, more funny in fact, but he does what he wants and we love him for it. The supporting cast from Bruce's butler Alfred are good, and the reporter is...okay. Okay so she isn't anything great, if anything she's annoying. I think the plot is interesting; being Tim Burton he gives a shot at 60's culture, satire of how people fancy themselves with make-up and other products, and decide to use it against the populous. The sleek and dark look of gotham is forever remembered in the eyes of filmmakers, having essence of Chicago and other crime driven cities. Also this film was I believe criticised for its dark tone; when that would come full bloom in the next installment, and in all honesty it's not that dark, it's darkly shot if that's what they meant. Now my final verdict for this film is what it is because it holds good nostalgia; even if it's not my favorite in the series, some good performances, and it's just to see the caped crusader on the big screen done right. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MalevolentJun 9, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Well, I finally watched this movie and I was not impressed. Maybe its because I watched the Nolan films first. Jack Nicholson as the Joker was weird. I didn't like him. I wasn't a big fan of Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne or Batman. Vicki Vale annoyed the hell out of me. I REALLY did not like the music by Prince. The part where Batman killed the thug really bothered me and yes, I know that Batman has killed people before, but that was a long time ago. And then there was the part where Joker shot down the Batwing with a bullet. A bullet. Really? I liked the music by Danny Elfman and I liked Alfred, but other than that I can't think of other things I liked about this movie. I didn't like the movie, but I didn't dislike it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
BatfanJul 3, 2013
Batman is a dark and violent superhero movie. Michael Keaton is the best Batman ever! The best Batman movie ever! Batman must stop the evil Joker from destroying Gotham City in this superhero blockbuster. Batman has everything a goodBatman is a dark and violent superhero movie. Michael Keaton is the best Batman ever! The best Batman movie ever! Batman must stop the evil Joker from destroying Gotham City in this superhero blockbuster. Batman has everything a good superhero film should have. While not that close to the comic it still has some comic book things in it. It defiantly the best. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
askewglassesAug 28, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This has been one of my favourite movies for years and years. This is the comic book movie at it's best, realistic enough but sticking to it's roots of the impossible. Keaton's performance remains to be the best Batman. Jack Nicholson gives us performance as the Joker, and with it is his dark and morbid sense of humour that appeals to me, I find him absolutely hilarious. The visuals and music fit perfectly together and to a visual artist like it's just perfect. What really works for this movie is that Batman's character is kept more of a mystery and because of that it's a better performance, and the Joker's story we learn the details of and is written and performed perfectly. Tim Burton's greatest film and one of my all time favourites. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
cag11Nov 29, 2013
Although there are some ridiculous sets, such as three mile high buildings and such, the acting is good, with great villains. Nicholson does one of his better performances to date.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
joao1198pedroOct 27, 2013
the first batman movie was somewhat gothic, but that does not mean it was a cool movie or has not changed the way to see superhero movies, this film is cool thanks to good acting jack nicholson.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
marcmyworksDec 2, 2013
This film is a classic and follows the archetype of the brooding Batman almost to a 'T". The only problem is that Tim Burton's vision sometimes gets bogged down with Prince's soundtrack and the "Pee Wee Herman"/"Beetlejuice" themes he usedThis film is a classic and follows the archetype of the brooding Batman almost to a 'T". The only problem is that Tim Burton's vision sometimes gets bogged down with Prince's soundtrack and the "Pee Wee Herman"/"Beetlejuice" themes he used in previous films. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
cjm868May 17, 2016
"You ever dance with the devil in the pale moonlight?"

The Caped Crusader of Gotham comes up against the Clown Prince of Crime. Batman '89 is a movie I will always remember fondly, because in a time before Nolan's Batman movies this
"You ever dance with the devil in the pale moonlight?"

The Caped Crusader of Gotham comes up against the Clown Prince of Crime.

Batman '89 is a movie I will always remember fondly, because in a time before Nolan's Batman movies this (and the 1992 sequel Batman Returns) was the ****

Michael Keaton gives a good understated performance as both Bruce Wayne and the Dark Knight which is nice because as good as Christian Bale is in the role, the growl of his can get a little... eh. Jack Nicholson's performance is gloriously over the top, and he's playing the Joker so I'd say it was called for. He was clearly having a ball because I'm sure Tim Burton said "you-know what, Jack, just do whatever and we'll keep filming and see how that goes."

I really like the gothic aesthetic that Tim Burton brought to his version of Batman, the movie looks fantastic.

My love for this film is not purely bred from nostalgia (although that helps), it's also a really solid flick. Have you seen it recently? Go back and watch it, it holds up.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
bfoore90Sep 5, 2015
Probably one of my favorite Batman movies of all time, Burton did an incredible job with this film and bringing "The Gotham Knight" to the big screen. It also can't be understated how good Michael Keaton is as Bruce Wayne and Batman, heProbably one of my favorite Batman movies of all time, Burton did an incredible job with this film and bringing "The Gotham Knight" to the big screen. It also can't be understated how good Michael Keaton is as Bruce Wayne and Batman, he really plays both sides incredibly well despite being known as a man of comedy at the time of accepting the role. Jack Nicholson was just incredible as well, though his Joker is more of a gangster gone mad than a truly unhinged clown as you might know Heath Ledger's iconic performance or Mark Hamill's adaption of the character. The CGI and special effects obviously don't age well and the films overall gothic tone is dark enough to make even Zack Snyder quiver in his boots. But even then, Batman is a classic. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Potarto72Dec 21, 2014
This film has a great atmosphere, and is very well-executed on a technical level, but none of the substance really works. The acting is dry, the characters are insufficient, and the story serves only to force the Batman logo onto the bigThis film has a great atmosphere, and is very well-executed on a technical level, but none of the substance really works. The acting is dry, the characters are insufficient, and the story serves only to force the Batman logo onto the big screen. It all just feels like a cash-in that happened to turn out looking pretty cool, but beyond that there isn't much to behold. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SeanandethanDec 31, 2016
In terms of design, this is the best Batman ever, and strikes a perfect balance between the gothic and gloomy and comic book levity. Batman's suit is awesome. The Joker is absolutely unwholesome. The action is pre-cgi, but it is great to seeIn terms of design, this is the best Batman ever, and strikes a perfect balance between the gothic and gloomy and comic book levity. Batman's suit is awesome. The Joker is absolutely unwholesome. The action is pre-cgi, but it is great to see the sets and models of another era of film. Love the Bladerunneresque film noir. For Batman fans this is a must. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
diogomendesSep 15, 2014
While the famous character known as The Joker sometimes overshadows the character title (feeling more like a Joker movie), "Batman" offers dark,stirring and eerie entertainment thanks to a witty performance from Jack Nicholson and a creativeWhile the famous character known as The Joker sometimes overshadows the character title (feeling more like a Joker movie), "Batman" offers dark,stirring and eerie entertainment thanks to a witty performance from Jack Nicholson and a creative direction from Tim Burton. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
AkashVijayJan 22, 2015
The characters are interesting but they're terribly overplayed (particularly the Joker). It's very superficial and very much all surface. But what keeps it interesting is its unpredictability and it's dark and gothic atmosphere. It's fairlyThe characters are interesting but they're terribly overplayed (particularly the Joker). It's very superficial and very much all surface. But what keeps it interesting is its unpredictability and it's dark and gothic atmosphere. It's fairly Juvenile compared to todays flawed heroes but back in 89 this was widely seen as the first sign of the maturing of superhero movies. The Casting was spot on. Nicholson is perfect for the Joker and Keaton is perfect as Batman. They're polar opposite personalities but not so different at heart. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MarickDec 10, 2014
Batman is a 1989 American superhero film directed by Tim Burton and produced by Jon Peters, based on the DC Comics character of the same name. It is the first installment of Warner Bros.' initial Batman film series. The film stars JackBatman is a 1989 American superhero film directed by Tim Burton and produced by Jon Peters, based on the DC Comics character of the same name. It is the first installment of Warner Bros.' initial Batman film series. The film stars Jack Nicholson, Michael Keaton in the title role, Kim Basinger, Robert Wuhl, Pat Hingle, Billy Dee Williams, Michael Gough, and Jack Palance. In the film, Batman deals with the rise of a costumed criminal known as "The Joker". Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Prodigy487Aug 3, 2014
Even though the film might be a bit too cartoony like the comics, Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson's performances as Batman and The Joker are portrayed well enough to make this film an enjoyable flick.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SythusRATINGSOct 17, 2014
Gotham City: dark, dangerous, 'protected' only by a mostly corrupt police department. Despite the best efforts of D.A. Harvey Dent and police commissioner Jim Gordon, the city becomes increasingly unsafe...until a Dark Knight arises. We allGotham City: dark, dangerous, 'protected' only by a mostly corrupt police department. Despite the best efforts of D.A. Harvey Dent and police commissioner Jim Gordon, the city becomes increasingly unsafe...until a Dark Knight arises. We all know criminals are a superstitious, cowardly lot...so his disguise must be able to strike terror into their hearts. He becomes a bat. Enter Vicky Vale, a prize-winning photo journalist who wants to uncover the secret of the mysterious "bat-man". And enter Jack Napier, one-time enforcer for Boss Grissom, horribly disfigured after a firefight in a chemical factory...who, devoid of the last vestiges of sanity, seizes control of Gotham's underworld as the psychotic, unpredictable Clown Prince of Crime...the Joker. Gotham's only hope, it seems, lies in this dark, brooding vigilante. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SSKellyHulseOct 19, 2014
I love this movie! It's the best one in the whole franchise and a true classic. The role as Batman was tailor made for Michael Keaton he's just perfect as Bruce Wayne. A bit cheesy at times and outdated a bit as far as special effects butI love this movie! It's the best one in the whole franchise and a true classic. The role as Batman was tailor made for Michael Keaton he's just perfect as Bruce Wayne. A bit cheesy at times and outdated a bit as far as special effects but makes up for it with the talented cast. Tim Burton is so cool! Definitely watch this movie! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MaxthemcgcriticNov 27, 2014
If I chose this or dark knight, I probably chose this because It feels like a dark batman comic was transformed in to a dark comic book movie, and I respect that. So yeah tough call but I half to go with this awesome movie and it's one of myIf I chose this or dark knight, I probably chose this because It feels like a dark batman comic was transformed in to a dark comic book movie, and I respect that. So yeah tough call but I half to go with this awesome movie and it's one of my favroite movies of all time:) Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SAVJul 13, 2015
Batman, uscito nel lontano 1989 e diretto dal talentuoso Tim Burton, è un ottimo film che ricrea perfettamente le gotiche atmosfere della famosa opera a fumetti che vede il plurimiliardario Bruce Wayne combattere il crimine di Gotham City neiBatman, uscito nel lontano 1989 e diretto dal talentuoso Tim Burton, è un ottimo film che ricrea perfettamente le gotiche atmosfere della famosa opera a fumetti che vede il plurimiliardario Bruce Wayne combattere il crimine di Gotham City nei panni del suo oscuro alter ego. Bellissima scenografia e grande recitazione, con Michael Keaton nei panni di Batman e lo straordinario Jack Nicholson nei panni del Joker. Un film che visto oggi sembra un po ridicolo in confronto alla monumentale trilogia di Nolan, ma che ai tempi della sua uscita era il massimo. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DanBurritoJan 6, 2016
Jack Nicholson's Joker may not compare to the legendary performance by Heath Ledger but Christian Bale's Batman (as good as he was) is nowhere near as good as Keaton's. I enjoyed this movie. My biggest complaint was the fact that a little tooJack Nicholson's Joker may not compare to the legendary performance by Heath Ledger but Christian Bale's Batman (as good as he was) is nowhere near as good as Keaton's. I enjoyed this movie. My biggest complaint was the fact that a little too many scenes revolved around The Joker (I know Jack is a big star and all, but the movie is called "Batman" not "The Joker"). But nevertheless, Michael Keaton nails it. It's difficult to imagine the guy who played Beetlejuice could nail a tormented hero like Batman but he does. And don't get me wrong, Nicholson's Joker is fun to watch- he's just a little just a bit over-the-top sometimes. Overall, a good film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
EpicLadySpongeApr 7, 2016
Batman has a few exceptions to what makes this Batman look dark and evil before the Dark Knight trilogy. For example, Micheal Keaton is a promising Batman actor, but the way he looks in this movie is poorly made. Could've gave him make-up toBatman has a few exceptions to what makes this Batman look dark and evil before the Dark Knight trilogy. For example, Micheal Keaton is a promising Batman actor, but the way he looks in this movie is poorly made. Could've gave him make-up to make his face look like the true Batman in the comics. Despite that, Batman looks too great to end up in the mixed or negative section. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AbeMCJul 26, 2016
Absolutely love the atmosphere and characterization of Burton's Batman universe. Keaton, Basinger, and of course Nicholson (among many others) all bring their A-game, Elfman's score is fantastic, the visual look and feel is dark, gloomy, andAbsolutely love the atmosphere and characterization of Burton's Batman universe. Keaton, Basinger, and of course Nicholson (among many others) all bring their A-game, Elfman's score is fantastic, the visual look and feel is dark, gloomy, and mysterious. Dated special effects and lackluster fight choreography take away from the experience, but not too much. The plot is built around impactful moments instead of large-scale coherence. Still a great Batman film; a solid 8 out of 10 despite the drawbacks. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
superbatApr 27, 2020
The movie which bought Batman to the big screen. Keaton does a great job as Batman. However, the best part of the movie was Jack Nicholson's Joker, who stole every scene he was featured in. In addition, the score and the gothic look of GothamThe movie which bought Batman to the big screen. Keaton does a great job as Batman. However, the best part of the movie was Jack Nicholson's Joker, who stole every scene he was featured in. In addition, the score and the gothic look of Gotham help to improve this movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SpyingPuppet363Jun 8, 2016
This film is truly a classic, if you haven't seen this movie yet, then what's wrong with you? This is the best out of the batman anthologies, no question about it. A minor flaw with a bunch of superhero movies is that you mainly see theThis film is truly a classic, if you haven't seen this movie yet, then what's wrong with you? This is the best out of the batman anthologies, no question about it. A minor flaw with a bunch of superhero movies is that you mainly see the movies to see the said superhero in action and don't care about most other scenes, but this movie executes those scenes so perfectly that it can't be considered a flaw. Not to mention the acting is spectacular, Michael Keaton as Batman and Jack Nicholson as the Joker are roles that they were both born to play. This movie HAS aged though, most of the effects can come off as pretty bad, especially the batwing scenes, but that hardly clouds my judgement. All in all, great film even after almost 30 years. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SadovLaxerJul 22, 2016
Tim Burton was the best director for this movie, it has action. but nobody knows who is the joker, he's not Jack Naiper. but this was a amazing job 8/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alejandro970May 20, 2018
Tim Burton stablished a brand new way of how adapt superhero comics to movies, with complex, compelling characters and a eerie atmosphere nearby to expresionism. It changed forever the profile of Batman wipping out the shadow of Adam West.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
BroyaxJan 2, 2017
Une vision très personnelle que ce Batman de Tim Burton qui oscille souvent comme un pendule détraqué entre le loufoque et la folie, entre une sorte de dessin animé caricatural et le kitsch voire le bizarre le plus échevelé. Comme une bandeUne vision très personnelle que ce Batman de Tim Burton qui oscille souvent comme un pendule détraqué entre le loufoque et la folie, entre une sorte de dessin animé caricatural et le kitsch voire le bizarre le plus échevelé. Comme une bande dessinée en somme qui peut se permettre toutes les facéties qui lui passent par la tête... ou presque.

Il en résulte quelque chose de déconcertant mais de résolument original, car Gotham est une ville issue de l'imagination et à nulle autre semblable : architecture gothique, mélange d'ambiance entre années 80 et années 50 et bien entendu l'homme-chauve-souris dont l'avatar Bruce Wayne est étrangement à côté de la plaque, brillamment interprété par Michael Keaton. Un héros donc bien plus humain que les tentatives trop aseptisées de Christopher Nolan.

Quant au Joker, il se taille la part du lion et Jack Nicholson lui donne une épaisseur incomparable faite d'ironie, de drôlerie et de méchanceté gratuite... un cabotin irrécupérable, un "artiste"... et un vrai dingue !

Bien sûr, le personnage de Vicky Vale est important pour l'histoire et une plastique avantageuse est une qualité non négligeable mais Kim Basinger ne cesse de nous navrer d'un bout à l'autre et du début à la fin : cette nana, c'est une souffrance.

Heureusement, la musique tonitruante de Danny Elfman se plie avec un brio stupéfiant au délire ambiant, caricaturant juste ce qu'il faut ses nombreux accents héroïco-héroïques et suit les deux névropathes de près, alternant ironie et romance.

Les répliques d'une manière générale semblent tout droit sorties d'une série B (ou Z ?) comme si elles se parodiaient elles-mêmes : il faut entendre par exemple le couplet que sort le grand Jack Palance à l'autre Jack ou les interventions "télévisées" du Joker...

Malgré sa durée raisonnable, le film souffre encore d'un manque de rythme ici et là et son côté BD est finalement autant un atout qu'un boulet à traîner, car rien n'est vraiment "sérieux" ou réaliste. Un Batman pas croyable mais auquel on adhère pour tous ses excès, loin du balai dans le fion de nombre de super-héros.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews