Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures | Release Date: July 17, 2015
7.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 2264 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,789
Mixed:
243
Negative:
232
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
arlethclarineSep 12, 2021
This movie is pretty good and creative.
He also made one of the most underappreciated characters in the Marvel universe popular.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
lennyiSep 24, 2021
I love this movie, it does not have the greatest villain, but it just has such great characters and it's really funny. I think every actor did an amazing job on this.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
netflicJul 25, 2015
Perfect visuals. Not much more. Actually, there is. Michael Peña is very good and funny in his supportive role. Main performances are not impressive but adequate for the genre.
Overall, it is a solid piece of entertainment with great special
Perfect visuals. Not much more. Actually, there is. Michael Peña is very good and funny in his supportive role. Main performances are not impressive but adequate for the genre.
Overall, it is a solid piece of entertainment with great special effects and plenty of humor.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
drlowdonJun 24, 2017
Believing it to be too dangerous, Hank Pym vows to hide his Ant-Man shrinking technology until he discovers that his former protégé is close to perfecting a shrinking suit of his own. He decides to enlist the help of thief Scott Lang to stealBelieving it to be too dangerous, Hank Pym vows to hide his Ant-Man shrinking technology until he discovers that his former protégé is close to perfecting a shrinking suit of his own. He decides to enlist the help of thief Scott Lang to steal the technology and keep it hidden from the world.

If you’ve been keeping up with the Marvel movies Ant Man will offer very little too surprise you but the mix of humour and spectacular action scenes still makes for an entertaining watch.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ColginatorJul 18, 2015
Whilst he had to wait for all the Super Soldiers and aggressive raccoons to have their movies, it's finally Ant-man's chance to make it to the big screen. And in spite of the unfortunate departure of Edgar Wright along with a short productionWhilst he had to wait for all the Super Soldiers and aggressive raccoons to have their movies, it's finally Ant-man's chance to make it to the big screen. And in spite of the unfortunate departure of Edgar Wright along with a short production time, Ant-man is still able to continue the style and quality of the Marvel cinematic universe.

Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) is a con-man and master thief who has recently been released from prison. Impressed by his skills, Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) recruits him to become the next Ant-man. He needs him to pull off a heist to retrieve the Yellowjacket suit, a costume with the same abilities of the Ant-man costume, being developed by Daren Cross (Corey Stroll) who intends to sell it to villainous corporations such as Hydra. Motivated by his desire to see his daughter again, Scott accepts his second chance in life and sets out to carry out the heist.

Whilst they try to raise the stakes at points (Pym reminds us every so often of how the Yellowjacket suit could change the world as we know it) the real charm of the film is in how low-key it is compared to the rest of the Marvel films. It's not some epic battle where the fate of humanity is at stake. Instead it's just a cool heist movie and a nice change of pace from the usual large scale tone used in most Marvel movies.

This low key style leaves a lot more focus on the characters to keep the film entertaining and fortunately the actors were up to the task. Paul Rudd is a great addition to the Marvel Superhero roster by being cool, likable and grounding Scott as a human character through bringing the same comedic skill that we loved in films like the 40 Year Old Virgin (albeit with less "You know how I know you're gay" jokes). Douglas is also memorable as his mentor and the original Ant Man, being an interesting take on a retired superhero. Instead of just being old and brooding, he still has the same courage and wit he had in his prime. Plus we get a few cool flashback scenes seeing a younger Michael Douglas (made with very convincing CGI) working as the original Ant- man in his prime, which looked so cool that it made me eager to see Pym get his own movie at some point.

Whilst Yellowjacket did seem to follow all the weak Marvel tropes for villains (rushed back-story, lack of screen time etc.) he was still surprisingly entertaining in the film. Largely because of Corey Stoll who not only gives a great menacing presence, but also plays it so over the top that he brings charm to an otherwise charmless character. The only weak character was Bobby Cannavale as Scott's ex-wives new douchey boyfriend. Mostly because the douchey boyfriend character is one of the most worn out clichés in cinema and didn't seem to have any real purpose in the film other than weak comedy relief. Plus it seems a shame that the film spends so much time with him whilst we hardly get any scenes with his wife and daughter (Judy Greer and Abby Fortson respectively) who are far more important to the story and should have had more screen time. It's especially disappointing Fortson didn't get more screen time since the few scenes she was in were amongst the funniest moments in the film.

However the centrepiece of this film is the action sequences, which contain the most creative fight scenes that Disney's Marvel have had in a while. The size shifting dynamic added a whole new element to the fight scenes visually, taking the usual destruction of a standard blockbuster and placing it inside a children's bedroom. Plus the scenes feel like they have Edgar Wright's fingerprints all over it having clever wordplay and great visual gags making the fights hilarious.

Though that's not to say that the fight scenes are flawless. At times their decisions to have the battles be created entirely with CGI are fairly distracting as most of the backgrounds are blurred out in the miniature scenes. It never ruins the fights, but it can be distracting. And it would have looked a lot better if they had been more creative for some of the sequences and used actual sets for some of the miniature shots.

But at the end of the film the lingering thought did remain, would Edgar White's Ant-man had been better? Maybe it would have been more visually creative. Or maybe it much of Wright was still in the film and it wouldn't be much different. But ignoring what it could have been, the films still great at what it does. It packs in the laughs, has likeable characters and does a decent origin story. However other than the fight sequences, there's nothing substantially different here that we haven't already seen from other superhero films.
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
lasttimeisawAug 2, 2015
A 3D cinema-going of Marvel’s latest offering ANT-MAN, which has always been in the pickle during its journey to the big screen, originally it had been a brainchild of Edgar Wright for years, then he dropped out in the relatively lateA 3D cinema-going of Marvel’s latest offering ANT-MAN, which has always been in the pickle during its journey to the big screen, originally it had been a brainchild of Edgar Wright for years, then he dropped out in the relatively late development due to creative disagreement, and Peyton Reed takes over the director chair. While Wright has a diehard fanbase and a distinct visual style (although his geeky smartness sometimes can go overboard, like SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD 2010), Reed can no more than be extolled as a slick journeyman in cranking up comedies like YES MAN (2008, 6/10), THE BREAK-UP (2006, 6/10), DOWN WITH LOVE (2003, 5/10) and BRING IT ON (2000), so fans should automatically lower their expectation.

keep reading my review on my blog, please google: cinema omnivore, thanks!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
T-rodneyAug 9, 2015
Antman was a gamble that paid off for Marvel. When Edgar Wright left i was'nt upset, but nervous because it was going under so many changes, but Peyton made Antman fun,emotional and enjoyable. The action was okay(good for an origin story), itAntman was a gamble that paid off for Marvel. When Edgar Wright left i was'nt upset, but nervous because it was going under so many changes, but Peyton made Antman fun,emotional and enjoyable. The action was okay(good for an origin story), it had a simple plot, but it was excecuted beautifly the performances from Micheal Douglas, Paul rudd and Evangeline Lilly were perfect and the secondary characters fit in well like tip harris and Bobby Cannavale although Judy Greer was't fleshed out. The father-daughter drama was spot on and Antman fit in to the Marvel universe perfectly.Whats not beautiful however is Corey Stoll as Yellowjacket before he was Yellowjacket he was an okay villian,BUT the transformation into yellowjacket took too long and he was sadly wasted, In the first act of the movie a few parts did'nt come together like Paul rudd becoming Antman and a few parts dragged on like Scott Lang's transition in to Antman,otherwise it was a fun movie, The humour, was amazing especially Michael Peña who was great comic relief. Antman was an enjoyable movie to watch with good action, cast and humour, and Marvel keeps on ticking with Good movies. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
mrmonsterJan 4, 2016
I'll start with what I liked, than I'll get to what I didn't. I liked the humor, and I liked how it was definitely a new take on the superhero genre. It was more of a heist film than anything. But the movie had plenty of flaws; the villainI'll start with what I liked, than I'll get to what I didn't. I liked the humor, and I liked how it was definitely a new take on the superhero genre. It was more of a heist film than anything. But the movie had plenty of flaws; the villain was as generic as you can get, and the movie's set up took more than an hour, I felt the exposition could have been a lot shorter. But other than that, the movie was fine. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleJul 22, 2015
At this point, if you walk into a Marvel movie you know what to expect. Ant-Man does not divert from the Marvel script at all and certainly finds a place within the Marvel Cinematic Universe (at least this one is self-aware). Yet, it managesAt this point, if you walk into a Marvel movie you know what to expect. Ant-Man does not divert from the Marvel script at all and certainly finds a place within the Marvel Cinematic Universe (at least this one is self-aware). Yet, it manages to be wildly entertaining and one of the funniest Marvel movies yet. Paul Rudd turns in a super charismatic performance as Scott Lang aka Ant-Man and Michael Douglas is very good as Hank Pym. As with all Marvel movies, the villain is pretty non-descript. However, the visuals are top-notch and the special effects are very well done throughout. A film that works well as a heist movie as well, Ant-Man pleads for you to care about its characters by playing on emotion and family. Though this fall flats, the film is fun and funny enough to overcome it. This is in large part due to Michael Pena who is hysterical here and honestly steals the show. If anybody needs a larger role in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it is obviously his character. Overall, Ant-Man is a well done superhero flick that will entertain people who like the Marvel formula. If you are tired of superhero movies, this one won't restore your hunger. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
Jack97Dec 17, 2016
It's a bit slow and choppy at the start, but Ant-Man quickly picks up with amazing CGI work and a nice smaller scale story that shows Marvel knows they don't need to make every film bigger than the last. This is a heist movie, a superheroIt's a bit slow and choppy at the start, but Ant-Man quickly picks up with amazing CGI work and a nice smaller scale story that shows Marvel knows they don't need to make every film bigger than the last. This is a heist movie, a superhero heist movie. And a pretty good one at that. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Compi24Jul 19, 2015
Wonky tones and lackluster baddies aside, "Ant-Man" still manages to further broaden the superhero film market with charming, heist-fueled antics and a winsome lead performance.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
MiljacAug 15, 2015
When I read that this movie was being compared to Guardians of the Galaxy, I thought I would hate it (cause I cannot stand GotG). But on the contrary, I really liked this one! Paul Rudd is such a great underrated comedic actor. Loved himWhen I read that this movie was being compared to Guardians of the Galaxy, I thought I would hate it (cause I cannot stand GotG). But on the contrary, I really liked this one! Paul Rudd is such a great underrated comedic actor. Loved him since his days on Friends. Corey Stroll was so good as the villainous Dr. Cross. Evangeline Lilly was also good, but it was really nice seeing Michael Douglas again. The story itself was fine. I really loved the visual effects when Ant-Man would shrink. There were a lot of funny moments. Character of Luis was a comic relief, maybe a bit over the top, cliche character, but still fun. All in all fun movie. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
cryhardhumorJul 23, 2015
It's action sequences are something to behold and more fun than you could believe, but there isn't a lot that ties them together except a few snappy one liners. In the end you walk out not regretting the $10 you paid for it, but at the sameIt's action sequences are something to behold and more fun than you could believe, but there isn't a lot that ties them together except a few snappy one liners. In the end you walk out not regretting the $10 you paid for it, but at the same time feeling like it was incomplete; fun, but incomplete. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
smodcastAug 2, 2015
With the bar marvel sets for its movies, this scores just above average. Not bad, but not great. Enough to keep you entertained for its run time, but nothing to write home about.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
moviemitch96Jul 18, 2015
Definitely not the best Marvel or Avenger film, but it's still pretty entertaining in its own right. Paul Rudd does rather well in the title role. The other cast members, such as Evangeline Lilly, Michael Douglass, Michael Pena, etc also didDefinitely not the best Marvel or Avenger film, but it's still pretty entertaining in its own right. Paul Rudd does rather well in the title role. The other cast members, such as Evangeline Lilly, Michael Douglass, Michael Pena, etc also did well. I was especially impressed with Corey Stoll's menacing performance as the villain Yellowjacket. In terms of story, the film didn't take itself too seriously, which is definitely a good thing since it is a Marvel film after all. Overall, it's another fun addition to Marvel's line of films. Stick around during the credits for another scene. Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
7
eagleeyevikingNov 25, 2018
Funny and action-packed but lacking an extra act, Ant-Man may not feel like a complete Marvel film but nevertheless still thrills.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AGarcia732Jul 28, 2015
“Ant-Man” is passable but could’ve been better. The humor, ‘heist’ aspect of the movie, and miniature-sized action scenes make it fun enough. The movie feels lively and cheery throughout, and I think this is one of the main reasons why it“Ant-Man” is passable but could’ve been better. The humor, ‘heist’ aspect of the movie, and miniature-sized action scenes make it fun enough. The movie feels lively and cheery throughout, and I think this is one of the main reasons why it works. The acting and story is average at best.

The humor is enjoyable and used well, in my opinion. It doesn't feel forced or unwarranted. The jokes and quips are at least more appropriately timed/placed than in Avengers: Age of Ultron.

The beginning of the film, showing a young Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) and a younger SHIELD, is pretty interesting. The younger Hank’s appearance is made possible using CGI to de-age actor Michael Douglas, and I would say it turned out pretty well.

*Michael Douglas managed to capture Hank's inner turmoil with what he was given. His anger, cynicism, and some tragic backstory (told to Scott + the audience by his daughter Hope) make Hank a compelling enough character. *Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) is perhaps the most relatable of the cast. He’s a nice guy, but the errors and mistakes of his past trouble his current life. He’s trying to mend family issues, and be a good father for his daughter Cassie. Paul Rudd brings a sort of average guy-charisma to the role, and you root for him and his redemption.

*Evangeline Lilly doesn’t have much to work with as Hank’s daughter Hope van Dyne. Her character could've used more development, but at least her dialogue with Scott and Pym is sometimes amusing. * “Ant-Man” unfortunately continues the trend of forgettable villains, as Corey Stoll plays Darren Cross (AKA cliche villain Yellowjacket). A businessman who wants to utilize revolutionary technology for evil purposes? This is not a new concept, and one already played out in “Iron-Man”. Remember Obadiah Stane? *Michael Pena brings the laughs as Luis (Scott’s old cellmate in prison who he lives with once he gets out).

The movie uses cliche tropes and storylines (strained family relationships, former criminal goes on quest for redemption, former protege turns against mentor, etc). There is nothing innovative about the story, and the scale of the finale might leave some to be desired. After Age of Ultron, you might be surprised at how small the ending might feel.

Ultimately, “Ant-Man” is average, but at least a fun time. If you like blockbusters and superhero films, then watch it. But if you’re more picky about your entertainment, then pass.

I have reviewed 43 movies (on Metacritic and IMDB), some recent ones, including: Minions (Despicable Me spin-off), Avengers: Age of Ultron, Fast and Furious 7, The Divergent Series: Insurgent, Taken 3, and more. I also review TV shows.

Notes:

*A good idea for a new Marvel One-Shot might be to have one about Hank Pym and his early adventures as Ant-man.
*Expect to see Hope van Dyne return in the MCU. She’ll probably take on the mantle of the Wasp, from her mother.
*R.I.P Anthony! That ant lived a good life :P
Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
7
tvnewsguidoJul 28, 2015
As a standalone superhero movie, Ant-Man is pretty great. It would be like an 8 if the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe didn't already exist.

Because we've been spoiled by the high quality of most of the rest of the MCU, Ant-Man is
As a standalone superhero movie, Ant-Man is pretty great. It would be like an 8 if the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe didn't already exist.

Because we've been spoiled by the high quality of most of the rest of the MCU, Ant-Man is like a 6 or a 7. It's fun and sciencey but most of the humor seems forced and many of the jokes just didn't land.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
DCEdmondsJul 17, 2015
"Ant-Man" 10 Scale Rating: 7.0 (Good) ...

The Good: As usual, Marvel did well in the casting department. Rudd delivers as a thief with a heart of gold, thrust into the world of super heroes. Corey Stoll was solid with what he had to work
"Ant-Man" 10 Scale Rating: 7.0 (Good) ...

The Good: As usual, Marvel did well in the casting department. Rudd delivers as a thief with a heart of gold, thrust into the world of super heroes. Corey Stoll was solid with what he had to work with, while Evangeline Lilly sulked through a large portion of the film before finally loosening up and turning in a decent performance. Micheal Douglas steals the show as Scott Lang's mentor, Hank Pym. The film also has a handful of cameos that will make fans of the Marvel Cinematic Universe smile. It takes some time to get around to it, but when we finally see Ant-Man involved in full bore action, it is very well done. The fight between himself and random goons, as well as the final battle with the villainous Yellowjacket, are very creative. The heist itself might be the most entertaining part of the film, as well as the ties to the greater Marvel Universe.

The Bad: While the film is pretty good, it just didn't wow me. Some aspects of it were too straight-forward and overly formulaic. Stoll's Daren Cross (AKA Yellowjacket) was a one-note villain and sort of a cliche character that we had already seen many times before. His backstory was somewhat force fed to us and you didn't feel much for him, thus making his motivations fall flat. The villain's ultimate fate was also a pretty big letdown. I also didn't mind the humorous elements of the film, but did feel they were a little over-done. It felt a lot like they were making as many attempts as possible, to insure that something would stick. While the film was entertaining and fits well into the shared universe, it falls squarely in the bottom half of my list when it comes to MCU offerings.
Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
7
ThePED7Jul 17, 2015
Marvel acerta mais uma vez em uma aventura leve, carismática e interessante, onde o filme se sustenta por si só, com pequenas referências bem colocadas sobre o universo Marvel e pela primeira vez um escalador de paredes é citado.ExcelenteMarvel acerta mais uma vez em uma aventura leve, carismática e interessante, onde o filme se sustenta por si só, com pequenas referências bem colocadas sobre o universo Marvel e pela primeira vez um escalador de paredes é citado.Excelente filme !!! Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
7
danippJul 19, 2015
I never thought Ant-Man was so cool. Despite some changes in the original comics that shouldn't have been ignored, the movie brings us humour and pretty exciting action sequences. This small superhero is funny, smart and lovely and wellI never thought Ant-Man was so cool. Despite some changes in the original comics that shouldn't have been ignored, the movie brings us humour and pretty exciting action sequences. This small superhero is funny, smart and lovely and well played by Rudd. Douglas and the rest of the cast are also amazing, including the hilarious Luis and his stories. We also have a cool relationship between him and his cute daughter, which adds some drama and family touch the story. In a nutshell, the film is great in introducing us the Ant-Man and how his path will cross Avengers in the future. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
TributeManMar 12, 2016
Mały, ale wariat!

Nie spodziewałem się po Ant-Manie tak dobrego filmu. Po wszystkich zapowiedziach wydawał się kolejnym filmem o super bohaterze z rozbuchanym ego ratującym w pojedynkę świat. Dostałem natomiast na prawdę śmieszną komedię.
Mały, ale wariat!

Nie spodziewałem się po Ant-Manie tak dobrego filmu. Po wszystkich zapowiedziach wydawał się kolejnym filmem o super bohaterze z rozbuchanym ego ratującym w pojedynkę świat. Dostałem natomiast na prawdę śmieszną komedię. Niestety Ant-Man ma jeden poważny problem. Są w nim okropne luki scenariuszowe. Na szczęście cała reszta jest jak najbardziej w porządku. Z czystym sumieniem polecam każdemu z Dobrym poczuciem humoru ;p
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
poser002Jul 20, 2015
Over all good movie, could have used a few more deeper parts, and a better villain fight. over all leads up to other avenger movies nicely with this one.
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
7
MattBrady99Jul 23, 2015
Scott Lang/Ant-Man: "Hello. I'm Ant-Man. Haven't you heard of me? No, you wouldn't have heard of me".

The story to Ant-Man is about Scott Lang who has worked alongside his friend and mentor Dr. Hank Pym but has never truly asserted
Scott Lang/Ant-Man: "Hello. I'm Ant-Man. Haven't you heard of me? No, you wouldn't have heard of me".

The story to Ant-Man is about Scott Lang who has worked alongside his friend and mentor Dr. Hank Pym but has never truly asserted himself. Now, armed with a suit that shrinks him in size but greatly increases his strength, Lang, now dubbed Ant-Man, will have to find the hero inside himself in order to pull off a heist that may very well be the key to saving the world.

The tiny superhero himself Ant-Man was originally going to be directed by the comedy genius himself Edgar Wright. Everyone and I do mean everyone was hyped about his next upcoming movie since this is the same guy who brought us such films as Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. But one day we all got the sad news that Edgar left the protect due to Marvel and him not agreeing on each other. It was so disappointing because I wonder what the movie would be like if Edgar Wright directed it. The movie was originally going to come out in 2014 but got pushed to 2015 due to that big delay. Now after seeing the movie I was surprised of how fun it was and how it was a solid movie even with the behind the scenes problems it all payed well.

Since Edgar was out we got another director that stepped in and that's Peyton Reed who did such movies like: Yes Man, The Break-up and Down with Love. I was a bit worried but at the same time a bit interested of what Peyton Reed will do with Edgar Wright source material and after seeing the movie I can safely say that Peyton Reed did a great job directing this movie. He directed the action scenes and the whole movie pretty well since he never directed action movies before and this is he's first time and he did it good. Nicely done Peyton Reed.

I never thought that Paul Rudd would be great playing superhero character when he was cast as Ant-Man, but Paul Rudd absolutely nailed it as Ant-Man as he had the charm, the right set of humor to balance his character nicely and he was the perfect actor for this comedic character like Ant-Man.

The humor in the movie are the basic Marvel humor that you always see in there movies. Edgar Wright also wrote the movie and at times I can tell what jokes and humor was his, but some other writers change a lot of the script (That's what I heard) adding some of the Avengers characters in the movie and at the end credit scene which Edgar didn't want and I can see why. Now it is good to see one or even more of The Avengers in another Marvel movie just for a little cameo but you know why they there to only set up the future Marvel movies and that's it really. That's just want it is really just a set up for the next movie and not let it be a good stand alone movie without other Avengers coming reminding you about the future Marvel movies. But that's just me. It's funny how I kept bringing up Edger Wright in this review, but what can say the guy is awesome.

The action scenes in the movie are just so stunning to watch. The action was excellently shot and when the character Ant-Man shrinks to ant size and takes down loads of enemies it was just awesome to watch it and it was a very creative action scene. The CGI in this movie really helped those action scenes or just the scenes where he's in ant size and everything around him is a size of a giant. Those scenes in the movie are worth the price of seeing.

I also love how this movie brought up the one thing that people always say "Why don't they just call The Avengers". In this movie they explain that it only takes a small person to do this small mission so you really don't need The Avengers to do this one small mission. I just love how the movie brought that up as it's saying shut the f**k up to those who are complaining about that.

Evangeline Lilly, Micheal Douglas, Michael Peña and the rest of the cast all did great in the movie as they were funny and truly enjoyable to watch.

Now for the problems: The villain of the movie Yellow Jacket played by Corey Stoll was a pretty weak villain and was kind of a cartoon villain at times. I think Corey Stoll is a great actor and I mean he was good in House of Cards and Midnight in Paris, but here he was the cliche I'm evil to do bad things to people and to are my character. He wasn't awful in the movie but he wasn't such a good villain.

Most of the character's in the movie felt like plot device like Scott's daughter in the movie as I could tell for a mile away what she's going to do later on in the movie and it happened as I expected.

Overall Ant-Man is another Marvel movie that turned out great just like Guardians. I like how Marvel are taking unknown comics that people never heard of and making them into big hits and everybody loving falling in love with them. Ant-Man was a lot of fun to watch and I actually like Ant-Man a little more than Age of Ultron, yeah I went there. Never again can anybody doubt Marvel for they next upcoming unknown project as you all known your going to eat it up.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
moviecritic68Aug 4, 2015
You know right off the bat if Michael Douglas accepted a role, the movie isn't going to stink. Again I say it's hard for me to score movies in this genre with real high marks. The average user score is reasonable. I would rate it a 7.5. KeptYou know right off the bat if Michael Douglas accepted a role, the movie isn't going to stink. Again I say it's hard for me to score movies in this genre with real high marks. The average user score is reasonable. I would rate it a 7.5. Kept my interest the whole time and made me laugh at times. What a fun movie should do. Very good casting & directing. Would recommend to friends Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RalfbergsDec 11, 2015
Even though I expected something different, this movie turned out to be quite good actually. If you like other Marvel movies you will definitely like this one too. Even if it is basically about an ant sized man fighting the so called evilEven though I expected something different, this movie turned out to be quite good actually. If you like other Marvel movies you will definitely like this one too. Even if it is basically about an ant sized man fighting the so called evil powers etc and doesn't make much sense, it is quite fun movie and quite interesting too to watch, even though maybe a bit predictable and cliche at some points. Still, good fun Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
PeterAlexanderJul 29, 2015
A combination of funny and well drawn out characters, immersive effects and an exciting story, help Antman to provide viewers with an engaging cinema experience. The contrasting serious and comedic personalities of Michael Douglas and MichaelA combination of funny and well drawn out characters, immersive effects and an exciting story, help Antman to provide viewers with an engaging cinema experience. The contrasting serious and comedic personalities of Michael Douglas and Michael Pena character's are matched with the more grounded performance of Paul Rudd as the protagonist. Whilst the films story is mostly immersive, it is the comedic elements and entertaining effects that steal the show. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
ValcanKrullJul 19, 2015
Middle of the road Marvel movie. Good MCU world-building but another forgettable villain. Humor was great but other than that it was nothing special. Not as good/entertaining as Winter Soldier/Guardians/IM1/Avengers1&2. Probably around TheMiddle of the road Marvel movie. Good MCU world-building but another forgettable villain. Humor was great but other than that it was nothing special. Not as good/entertaining as Winter Soldier/Guardians/IM1/Avengers1&2. Probably around The First Avenger as far as quality goes but far more lighthearted. This movie is a success in that it was not the failure I thought it would be. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
Jess_HillJul 17, 2015
Better than I was expecting, this is a fun, family-friendly addition to the Marvel franchise. The script is delightful, and Rudd's laconic humour and style is perfect throughout the film. Nicely paced, with really enjoyable, and funny, actionBetter than I was expecting, this is a fun, family-friendly addition to the Marvel franchise. The script is delightful, and Rudd's laconic humour and style is perfect throughout the film. Nicely paced, with really enjoyable, and funny, action sequences, as well as a compelling storyline, this is a light-hearted but engaging experience. Whilst it's not the best Marvel film, it's by no means the worst, and will act as a nice segue for younger audiences into the (oftentimes darker) universe. 7.21/10 Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
7
CineAutoctonoDec 5, 2015
A good movie , but I loved this clear visual effects and CGI of the microscopic world , a good script, a magnificent performance of the deal, Marvel and Disney partner still has its high quality
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
kyle20ellisMar 24, 2022
Having enjoyed a vast majority of Marvel's superhero output (more so than most) without worshipping them, 'Ant-Man' is a minor effort from them but there is still a good amount to like about it.

'Ant-Man' manages to be a better film than
Having enjoyed a vast majority of Marvel's superhero output (more so than most) without worshipping them, 'Ant-Man' is a minor effort from them but there is still a good amount to like about it.

'Ant-Man' manages to be a better film than expected. The character is not exactly a household name and is always tossed aside in favour of other superhero characters like Spiderman that have had longer longevity and perhaps have more compelling origins and stories, hence why they are adapted more. Also wasn't sure what to make of the trailer, which made the film out to be rather bland and too reliant on humour.

Seeing it for myself finally a year on, 'Ant-Man' could have been better. While the humour mostly works wonders, there are a few instances where it's not so funny and not very well placed, like in emotional scenes that are actually quite poignant and then interrupted by a joke that is not only forced and unfunny but also not belonging in the scene. The family scenes are a mixed bag, sometimes they are sweet and touching while at other times they're a little flat and predictable, contributing towards a few rare dull stretches. Corey Stoll also goes through the motions as the rather generic and under-characterised villain.

On the other hand, 'Ant-Man' is a great looking film, it's beautifully shot, very atmospheric, is very slick and the special effects, mostly the rapid size-changing and with the ants, are clever and of the usual high-quality Marvel standards. The music avoids being over-bearing, one-note, too quirky or too bombastic, fitting well tone, mood and pace-wise. Direction is more than competent, keeping the story going at a solid pace and the telling of it interesting enough, though maybe a little more flavour may have been more welcome. While the action is not as much as most Marvel films, it is fun, thrilling, nicely choreographed and tautly shot and edited, especially towards the end. Admittedly there are a couple of cheesy parts towards the end too, but kind of in an endearing rather than jarring way and it doesn't jar with the rest of the film.

There is some very smart and hugely entertaining scripting and dialogue here in 'Ant-Man' too. While it doesn't work completely seamlessly, 'Ant-Man' is one of Marvel's generally consistently funniest films, and the film doesn't take itself too seriously or too much of a joke either, instead not being afraid to embrace the silliness and humour while ensuring still that the subject matter is treated with respect. It is especially good with the title character's deadpan quips and Luis' fast-talking patter. The story is mostly diverting, it's narratively simpler than most Marvel outings and less risks here are taken than most Marvel films but it always makes sense, moments of dullness and jarring are few (while not being completely absent either), it's fun and it doesn't try to do too much or try to insert too many characters while not playing things too safe either.

While not complex as such, the characters are mostly engaging and are not too one-dimensional, only the villain could have had more done with him. Paul Rudd is a strong and hugely entertaining lead, while Michael Peña's hilarious in a role that could have been really annoying. The seasoned support of Michael Douglas adds hugely too, and Evangeline Lilly gives the film some much needed heart. Anthony Mackie is good too.

Overall, minor Marvel but good Marvel. Well-made and a lot of fun, but there is a personal preference to the Marvel films that took bigger risks with more and often richer characters, bigger bolder action and more going on in the story. 'Ant-Man' executes a vast majority of its components really well indeed, just that Marvel has done even better before and since. 7/10 Bethany Cox
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
nikmahmahSep 9, 2015
very good this movie. your watch or download free movies, and easily click the link below.
this link ht*tp:/*/hitzz*movi.blo*gspot.c*om/
remove the star code
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Redwarrior1upSep 11, 2015
A great addition into the MCU, the humor was on point, the acting was great especially from Michael Douglas, and the story better than a lot of the origin stories I've seen.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
RoniPogi77Nov 21, 2015
An entertaining addition to the Marvel cinematic universe. Like other movies where shrinking is involved, this one makes use of insects--either the shunken hero riding them or commanding them. The movie has many moments and at times quiteAn entertaining addition to the Marvel cinematic universe. Like other movies where shrinking is involved, this one makes use of insects--either the shunken hero riding them or commanding them. The movie has many moments and at times quite funny. But the science in this sci-fi flick is very flimsy. Maybe not enough to bother the casual viewer, but for a nerd like me it did. They could have left out the part (or done it better) where the villain explains how the shinking process works (it shrinks the distances between atoms, but mass remains the same). This explanation is completely ignored afterward since Antman's mass clearly changed--for example he can ride a winged ant and that ant can carry him easily in flight. That should be impossible if his shunken mass was the same as his normal mass. And then we have the whole "going subatomic" thing. If what the suit does is SHRINK the DISTANCE BETWEEN ATOMS how can it make the wearer shrink SMALLER THAN AN ATOM? I felt a better thought out explanation of the shrinking process (and what precisely happens to one's mass) should have been included. But other than that flaw, it was an entertaining film and quite different in many ways from Marvel's other superhero films. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
AWassermanDec 20, 2015
Very shocking at how much fun this movie is. Marvel took a silly character and made it work so well. I found so much fun with this movie. Better than most of the Marvel films, honestly. It was a refreshing take on a comic book character thatVery shocking at how much fun this movie is. Marvel took a silly character and made it work so well. I found so much fun with this movie. Better than most of the Marvel films, honestly. It was a refreshing take on a comic book character that worked beyond well. But as a movie, I can't say it was better than a 7.5/10. I don't have expectations for a sequel, but this movie surprised many, so who knows. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
aadityamudharApr 17, 2016
“Ant-Man” is passable but could’ve been better. The humour, ‘heist’ aspect of the movie, and miniature-sized action scenes make it fun enough. The movie feels lively and cheery throughout, and I think this is one of the main reasons why it“Ant-Man” is passable but could’ve been better. The humour, ‘heist’ aspect of the movie, and miniature-sized action scenes make it fun enough. The movie feels lively and cheery throughout, and I think this is one of the main reasons why it works. The acting and story is average at best. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
EpicLadySpongeJan 7, 2016
Now it's not that hard to give this one a 7. It's decently good from Marvel and company. The Ant-Man movie will at least shrink so you can at least see it one more time with the Ant-Man hero.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
AaronWasserman1Mar 26, 2016
A very fun Marvel movie, but not a movie i feel I need to see again, and that is a common trend I seem to experience with Marvel movies, they are fun in a theater and I look forward to them, but in the end, they are silly popcorn movies.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
ElectroNickMay 11, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Much like everyone else I was pretty doubtful about how this film would turn out. Even after the success of "Guardians of the Galaxy" I was expecting this film to bomb. Much to my surprise though it turned out to be a solid film. It is not groundbreaking as the other films but it is good at what it does. i was nervous about this film since Hank Pym had always been one of my least favorite heroes but they made the smart move of him being a mentor figure and having the spotlight be on Scott Lang. He is the typical reluctant hero with a criminal past and tries to redeem himself. He has a nice relationship with his daughter and has problems with his marriage due to his criminal past. The family is a big component of his character arc but there are still lasting consequences for his past. Even when he saves his daughter he still is divorced and is still living away from his daughter. The relationship he has with Hank is the the typical hero mentor relationship which reminds me of a similar relationship that Mr. Hun and Daniel from the Karate Kid remake had when the mentor learns from the student as well as the student learning from the mentor. His relationship with the future Wasp was also well done as they learn form each other as well as start to grow a fondness for the other. I am interested in seeing how Ant Man would fit into the Avengers and I would love to see Wasp enter the fray in the future battles ahead. The action scenes are fun to watch because they give creative elements to other wise standard action sequences. Unfortunately there are some problems that keeps this film from being only a good film to a great film. As well as the story line was told, it does rely heavily on cliches. The plot was well told and it did have some genuine surprises such as the time when Ant-Man shrunk so much that he was in another dimension which gives way to a visual spectacular visual set piece. Aside from that though the majority of the story line revolves around the standard tropes of a heist movie. As well developed as the main heroes are, the villain is once again bland. Marvel really needs more villains that stand out aside from Kingpin, Ultron, Loki, and Iron Monger. The side characters are really nothing more than stereotypes which includes a very problematic representation of Latinos in Lang's best friend. It is also strange that Wasp wasn't allowed to be part of the final battle even though it was heavily established that she was a better fighter than Lang. Although I still think this is a good film I did dislike that one aspect of it. It is a good film that could have been a great film if it wasn't tied down by it's reliance on cliches and stereotypes. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
MEFzelderMay 15, 2016
Para mi sorpresa "Ant-Man" es una gran película de Marvel Studios, se las arreglaron para poder adaptar por ser un héroe tan "random" y darle una personalidad carismática que te deja con ganas de querer más de él y, sobretodo, hacerloPara mi sorpresa "Ant-Man" es una gran película de Marvel Studios, se las arreglaron para poder adaptar por ser un héroe tan "random" y darle una personalidad carismática que te deja con ganas de querer más de él y, sobretodo, hacerlo creíble.
Si se nota que tiene actores bien involucrados en el proyecto como Paul Rudd, Michael Douglas y Evangeline Lilly, quienes tienen un muy buen desempeño, y crean una atmósfera entretenida y de relaciones bien marcadas (Como el amor de padre e hija de Hank Pym con Hope o el desarrollo romántico de Scott Lang con Hope). Los efectos especiales también son sobresalientes.
Lo que no hace que la película sea mejor es el villano, Corey Stoll esta bien en su papel pero es un villano que ya se vio varias veces en el UCM, en Iron Man 1, 2 y 3 los enemigos son un tipo que utiliza la misma tecnología que el héroe o un villano en traje, si no son ambas cosas.
Mi recomendación es véanla si les gusta el universo de Marvel o son nuevos, no hace falta conocer las otras historias para entender "Ant-Man" y las propuestas para las siguientes apariciones del personaje.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
HTGamerApr 25, 2018
Ant-Man is one of the better MCU movies, finally introducing one of its original Avengers from the comic books. Michael Douglas is great as Hank Pym (aka the original Ant-Man), and so is Paul Rudd as his successor Scott Lang. It's a heistAnt-Man is one of the better MCU movies, finally introducing one of its original Avengers from the comic books. Michael Douglas is great as Hank Pym (aka the original Ant-Man), and so is Paul Rudd as his successor Scott Lang. It's a heist movie with plenty of humor and personal drama. Ant-Man's ability to shrink down to the size of an ant and back to normal makes for some refreshing, entertaining action sequences. But the Yellowjacket villain is simply meh, as well as the few other baddies with ties to HYDRA. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
superbatMay 30, 2020
Ant-Man is a decent movie. It's different from most Marvel movies. The action, visuals, and humor were on point. Paul Rudd shines as Scott Lang. The big heist scene was quite entertaining. On the other hand, the villain was quite unmemorableAnt-Man is a decent movie. It's different from most Marvel movies. The action, visuals, and humor were on point. Paul Rudd shines as Scott Lang. The big heist scene was quite entertaining. On the other hand, the villain was quite unmemorable and the story was dry at times. Overall, it's still a fun watch. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
dislexicpotatoApr 14, 2019
Solid acting and plenty of fun ideas make this a unique film worth your time, even though the movie is kinda forgettable
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SonicHD7Jun 1, 2017
Forced out of his own company by former protégé Darren Cross, Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) recruits the talents of Scott Lang (Paul Rudd), a master thief just released from prison. Lang becomes Ant-Man, trained by Pym and armed with a suitForced out of his own company by former protégé Darren Cross, Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) recruits the talents of Scott Lang (Paul Rudd), a master thief just released from prison. Lang becomes Ant-Man, trained by Pym and armed with a suit that allows him to shrink in size, possess superhuman strength and control an army of ants. The miniature hero must use his new skills to prevent Cross, also known as Yellowjacket, from perfecting the same technology and using it as a weapon for evil. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Zummy1976May 11, 2017
This was great fun. Marvel movies tend to be better the smaller they are. This and Doctor Strange are far superior to the bloated team ups. And Thomas the Tank Engine totally steals the show.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
LillieyMay 28, 2017
A really nice surprise of a film. Paul Rudd is hilarious and down to earth as the (at times) pint sized superhero. Some great set pieces and supporting performances make this a welcome entry to the MCU. B-
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Bugger217Sep 14, 2017
Ant-Man tells a pretty straightforward superhero origin story that mostly adheres to the Marvel formula, with a few twists. It's a ton of fun, despite the familiarity, and the actors are incredibly charming. The movie really shines in its setAnt-Man tells a pretty straightforward superhero origin story that mostly adheres to the Marvel formula, with a few twists. It's a ton of fun, despite the familiarity, and the actors are incredibly charming. The movie really shines in its set pieces, which are visually inventive and add an interesting new fold to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Overall, it's a middling entry in the franchise, but we're talking about a franchise that doesn't have any awful movies. You could do a whole lot worse with a couple hours of your time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JLuis_001Sep 7, 2017
One more good work from Marvel, once again they have achieved a movie that it's fun, exciting and very entertaining.

Although we may mourn and grieve over what may have been a more inventive and original work in Edgar Wright's hands this
One more good work from Marvel, once again they have achieved a movie that it's fun, exciting and very entertaining.

Although we may mourn and grieve over what may have been a more inventive and original work in Edgar Wright's hands this franchise seems to have a solid base.

Can't wait for a sequel.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CoreGamer1408Apr 21, 2023
Likeable cast vs a forgettable villain. Lighthearted and jokey at times. Fun origins movie for sure.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
d0vla11Jul 10, 2018
I really liked it.
It's the movie that will keep you entertained till the end, has a solid story. Very good acting, especially by Michael Douglas and Paul Rudd.
Definitely recommended!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
LivingTribunalApr 23, 2018
Fantastic, I can say that it is the best first solo movie of Marvel as a marvel fan. However, if you expected a scale as winter soldier or avengers series, you might be disappointed. This movie wasn't that popular, but after you watch thisFantastic, I can say that it is the best first solo movie of Marvel as a marvel fan. However, if you expected a scale as winter soldier or avengers series, you might be disappointed. This movie wasn't that popular, but after you watch this movie, you'll really like this character. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
bertboy93Jun 28, 2020
Antman is just a fun and rewatchable movie. The characters were realy good and you felt for them during the movie. there is nothing too great about this movie it's just a good and fun movie
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018
With compelling action sequences and a charismatic performance from Paul Rudd, "Ant-Man" is another great addition to the already extremely successful Marvel movie franchise.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
OnaskOct 21, 2018
Ant-Man ha sido una de las grandes sorpresas del MCU para mí. Esperaba una bazofia de relleno para meter como fuera al personaje en el grupo Avengers, pero me encontré con una película increíblemente entretenida, muy bien dirigida e inclusoAnt-Man ha sido una de las grandes sorpresas del MCU para mí. Esperaba una bazofia de relleno para meter como fuera al personaje en el grupo Avengers, pero me encontré con una película increíblemente entretenida, muy bien dirigida e incluso graciosa. No es ninguna obra maestra, obviamente, pero se deja ver de principio a final sin tener que mirar el reloj o hacer algún gesto de puro cringe por algún chascarrillo típico del cine de Marvel.

Recomendada.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
PaulxavierfosteMay 23, 2019
Der Film hat seine witzigen Stellen, auch die Darstellung unter der Erde sind gut gemacht. Die Story ist Marvel-typisch und der Boss-Fight ist sehr witzig in einer eher untypischen Location gemacht worden. Also, eine solide 7/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
BlackHorse3339Jul 1, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So if u start watching this movie with a mind set of Paul Rudd being the true master mind then u will be dissatisfied. Paul Rudd gives his character a fullform and justice..he can put his life at stake for his daughters'life ... Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TaisenZAug 2, 2019
Não esperava absolutamente nada, pensava se tratar de apenas um filme genérico para dar mais volume ao MCU, mas fico feliz em admitir que estava errado. Scott Lang e seus amigos são muito engraçados e o filme tem uma vibe muito boa.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MahmusOct 20, 2020
It seemed like a weird way to end phase two, but after the bombastic Age of Ultron failed to live up to my expectations, the more small scale (no pun intended) Ant-Man surpassed them.

Paul Rudd, of course, is extremely likeable and I really
It seemed like a weird way to end phase two, but after the bombastic Age of Ultron failed to live up to my expectations, the more small scale (no pun intended) Ant-Man surpassed them.

Paul Rudd, of course, is extremely likeable and I really like the family drama elements of the story. Also, the shrinking effects are seriously impressive.

I really enjoy Corey Stoll as the villain. His character is far from complex, but I love how he hams it up as an unapologetically cartoony villain (he has a shrinking gun for Christ's sake!).

Why wasn't he Lex luthor instead of Jesse Eisenberg?
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Sosmooth1982Apr 17, 2023
This movie is like a mix of honey I shrunk the kids' with some action in it, and it's made by Marvel. Plus it's really funny.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Onlyclassicvg1Dec 8, 2020
The Incredible Hulk isn't very Incredible.
Edward Norton gives a good performance but the concept of Hulk itself just seems tired. There is no new outlook on the hero just simply a repeatedly mediocre take on a very one dimensiona
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Joseph13Nov 28, 2020
well to be honest my expectations were very low maybe that’s why i liked the movie a lot. anyways i love the plot & villian & characters. paul rudd did his thing! btw evangeline lilly is so **** sexy im in luvvvv
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
PhoenixReveiwsJan 21, 2021
This is one movie I went into not knowing what I was to expect. I thought "Ant-Man? of all the heroes they have to add they choose Ant-Man?" But when I saw it blew me away. Not because it's the best Marvel movie, as it's far from perfect. ButThis is one movie I went into not knowing what I was to expect. I thought "Ant-Man? of all the heroes they have to add they choose Ant-Man?" But when I saw it blew me away. Not because it's the best Marvel movie, as it's far from perfect. But Paul Rudd as Ant-Man changed my mind, I hope to see more of Ant-Man in the future. This film was very good, with the right amount of funny and comedic moments in it. This film was done very well. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
cdougallJul 21, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. After recovering from a shaky scene after the credits, Ant-Man becomes a mostly enjoyable film, led by a strong and charming performance from Paul Rudd. His charisma and chemistry with the other characters carries a lot of scenes and injects some funny moments into the film. This is a (fittingly) small scale heist movie with big repercussions that actually works, and shows that Marvel is expanding its comfort zone in terms of genres. The action is decent but it doesn’t quite live up to the standards set by other MCU installments. Anthony Mackie is nicely worked into the story and is a welcome appearance in the film, and his presence allows the movie to be connected to the Avengers franchise without spending too much time on the connection. With that said, the writing and directing are both a bit awkward at times which disrupts the flow of some scenes and just makes them feel a bit weird. The actors do their best to overcome this when it happens and are successful at times, and Peyton Reed does his best as well. Without Paul Rudd, this movie doesn’t work, since he brings, as mentioned above, charm and charisma to this movie that it badly needed and allows it work in many instances where it otherwise wouldn’t. While Ant-Man doesn’t set any gold standards for future Marvel movies, it does way better than it could’ve and is an interesting piece of genre deviation for the MCU. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021
----------------------------------7.0/10-----------------------------------
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DolphinReviewsJul 20, 2022
Surprisingly good. Marvel was able to take one of the lamest characters and make a great movie. The comedy, action, CGI, are all good. Good movie all around.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Fixer84Mar 15, 2023
Perhaps the best movie about the origins of a Marvel character. Not surprisingly, the screenwriter of this film is Edgar Wright.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
finelllaJun 24, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ant-Man, dirigida por Peyton Reed, presenta una propuesta refrescante dentro del universo cinematográfico de Marvel, y gran parte de su atractivo radica en sus efectos especiales innovadores. Esta película nos sumerge en un mundo donde la escala se transforma, y los efectos visuales juegan un papel fundamental para llevar esa premisa a la pantalla grande.

Los efectos especiales en Ant-Man son sorprendentes y creativos. La habilidad de cambiar la escala del protagonista, desde el tamaño de un insecto hasta el de un humano, es retratada de manera impresionante. La atención al detalle en cada escena, desde las minúsculas partículas hasta las imponentes vistas aéreas, es un testimonio del trabajo meticuloso realizado por el equipo de efectos visuales.

La secuencia más destacada es la del enfrentamiento final en la habitación de juguetes, donde Ant-Man se enfrenta a su némesis en una batalla épica. La forma en que se utiliza el entorno en miniatura para crear situaciones ingeniosas y emocionantes es un testimonio de la creatividad del equipo de efectos especiales. Los momentos en los que Ant-Man se reduce a un tamaño diminuto y luego regresa a su tamaño normal en medio de la acción añaden un elemento de sorpresa y emoción a las escenas.

Además de los efectos visuales, el diseño de producción en Ant-Man es impresionante. Los escenarios en miniatura, como la maqueta de la casa y el laboratorio, están llenos de detalles encantadores que ayudan a crear un mundo mágico y fascinante. Los efectos de sonido también contribuyen a la inmersión en el mundo de Ant-Man, ya sea a través de los ruidos característicos de los insectos o de los estruendos impactantes cuando cambia de tamaño.

Si bien los efectos especiales son uno de los puntos destacados de Ant-Man, la película también ofrece una historia entretenida y un elenco carismático. Paul Rudd se destaca en el papel de Scott Lang, ofreciendo un equilibrio perfecto entre el humor y el heroísmo. Michael Douglas aporta una presencia madura y convincente como el Dr. Hank Pym, mientras que Evangeline Lilly brinda una actuación sólida como la intrépida Hope van Dyne.

En resumen, Ant-Man es una película que destaca por sus efectos especiales innovadores y creativos. La habilidad de cambiar de escala y la atención al detalle en cada escena son prueba del talento del equipo de efectos visuales. Aunque la película también cuenta con una historia entretenida y un elenco carismático, son los efectos especiales los que elevan la experiencia y hacen que Ant-Man sea una adición interesante al universo de Marvel.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TVJerryJul 23, 2015
Paul Rudd adds his offhand comic delivery to the superhero genre as a man who can shrink small, while increasing in strength. He's recruited by Dr. Pym (Michael Douglas) to wear the super suit and lead an army of ants to save the world from aPaul Rudd adds his offhand comic delivery to the superhero genre as a man who can shrink small, while increasing in strength. He's recruited by Dr. Pym (Michael Douglas) to wear the super suit and lead an army of ants to save the world from a competing inventor. This latest Marvel movie has a lighter touch and goes for a more human connection. That means some enjoyable laffs and more chat than is needed for action films. When there is action, the miniature effects are fun and the sequences clip along at a snappy pace. Without Rudd's charm the movie would have "little" appeal. Even though it's entertaining, there's nothing especially incredible or original. NOTE: There are 2 post-movie teasers: 1 after the end title credits and the other at the very end. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
JohnnyCJul 17, 2015
More of a comedic heist film with superheroes thrown into the mix, than a flat out origin tale. Entertaining none the less with a great performance by Michael Douglas as Hank Pym, the original Ant-Man. Not one of Marvel's best, but definitelyMore of a comedic heist film with superheroes thrown into the mix, than a flat out origin tale. Entertaining none the less with a great performance by Michael Douglas as Hank Pym, the original Ant-Man. Not one of Marvel's best, but definitely family friendly, so take the kids. Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
6
FallsDownzJul 20, 2015
Just another Marvel movies that has nothing new to deliver , Super Cliche plot and characters with terrible screenplay this is like a kid movie that you just go in and then close your brain for 2 hours it's fun it's loud and it's dumb.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
njlakeAug 7, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I enjoyed this more than expected, but that's only because my expectations were not very high.

Ant-Man is a relatively minor character in Marvel comics but there's no telling how much of a role he'll play in the MCU. That's kind of where the problems (minor character) and the good parts are (MCU involvement).

This movie, when it didn't revolve around the Avengers or anything involving the rest of the MCU was a pretty ordinary superhero movie. What set it apart was Paul Rudd and Michael Douglas. Both play their characters very well. I liked the idea of Scott Lang (Rudd) being a burglar that Hank Pym (Douglas) was watching for a while. Inevitably Pym teams of with Lang through Michael Peña's character (good choice) getting a tip to break into Pym's house.

I enjoyed a lot of the moments and the comedy wasn't too over the top. But where this movie falls short is where a lot of other superhero movies fall. The villain. Basically, just like almost every other superhero movie, the hero is fighting a different version of himself. It's a tired and overused character at this point.

I'm interested to see where Marvel takes this character within the rest of the MCU, but this film also has me a little worried for the upcoming Doctor Strange and Black Panther standalone movies. I have no doubt that Marvel can make them work within an ensemble but unfortunately their stand alone films may be a little weak.
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
6
gracjanskiMay 26, 2022
On the one hand the visual effects are great and the play with size is fun. Also the humour was not bad sometimes.

But the focus of the movie is to show it for teenies and kids, so the story and dialogues are too easy to understand. Some
On the one hand the visual effects are great and the play with size is fun. Also the humour was not bad sometimes.

But the focus of the movie is to show it for teenies and kids, so the story and dialogues are too easy to understand. Some actors/characters were boring, especially Corey Stroll as Darren Cross and Evangeline Lilly as Hope van Dyne. Also the political correct elements were annoying.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
fusion_13Oct 3, 2015
Ant-Man was a really fun movie, probably one of the most fun Marvel movies to date similar to GotG, having said that, it ain't no Guardians. It is just simply a meh movie, Marvel's formula is becoming stale now, one liners left right andAnt-Man was a really fun movie, probably one of the most fun Marvel movies to date similar to GotG, having said that, it ain't no Guardians. It is just simply a meh movie, Marvel's formula is becoming stale now, one liners left right and center, just too many jokes. I loved the heist aspect of the movie, as it kept the movie fresh and not just a typical action movie. Douglas was great as Pym and Rudd was fantastic as Ant-Man. The easter eggs were great and the fight with Falcon was good too, Marvel have done a great job at building this universe.

Ant man's villain.....Ugh, Marvel can barely get a villain right other than Loki, hopefully Thanos doesn't continue this trend. Overall it was an enjoyable movie to watch, it just didn't wow me like other comic book movies have.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
oDjentoJul 22, 2015
Ant Man tries to do something different to break from the mould like 2014’s GOTG, but doesn’t end up accomplishing it as successfully.
Ant Man is a reasonably fun and self-aware action film that will entertain, but it doesn’t bring anything
Ant Man tries to do something different to break from the mould like 2014’s GOTG, but doesn’t end up accomplishing it as successfully.
Ant Man is a reasonably fun and self-aware action film that will entertain, but it doesn’t bring anything too unique or astounding to the table here. This feature being a heist film instead of a standard superhero film is a nice nuance that works well and Paul Rudd as the lead was a good casting choice; but most of the rest of the characters are pretty plain. The most entertaining characters are Rudd and his fellow thieves, and this probably goes down well due to the chemistry between them. Personally I think they didn’t get enough screen time.
Michael Douglas’ Dr Pym is quite a boring and typical character, nothing being wrong with Douglas’ acting here but his character is just too plain. His daughter is pretty average too, playing a daughter who hates her dad but will help him with this heist; oh and she also knows kung-Fu just for some plot development. The chemistry between these two doesn’t seem entirely there and so their scenes fall flat, but this isn’t just in part to the actors, the script is faulty for that (will explain after character section). Finally Corey Stoll’s character is so one dimensionally evil that he ends up becoming a pretty forgettable villain. It seems like when you’re watching it you are witnessing Frank Underwood inside Peter Russo’s body that is obsessed with science instead of politics. He does have a sweet-ass suit though.
Now onto the script, for the most part the heist mechanic worked well with Rudd and his crew but once it gets him into the Ant Man suit and he starts hanging around Douglas and Lilly’s characters it seems that the pages for these scenes got coffee spilt on them and they had to improvise half of it. The back story and clunky exposition behind Douglas and Lilly’s characters are so force fed to you it’s cringey, and to watch the sudden admiration/attraction that grows between Lilly and Rudd’s character is just clichéd and monotonously delivered. The scenes slow down majorly until a certain encounter involving an Avenger; which was an absolute blast. After that nothing too interesting until Rudd’s team arrive back on the job allowing some comic moments and then the finale- this finale also fully embraces its silliness and goes all out delivering probably the best sequence of the film. There was a small gap that seemed so forcefully put in the finale though that it detracted from the excitement for a second but then went straight back into it. One thing I must say though is the ending (NO SPOILERS) on how a certain character figures out how to come back from somewhere seemed like complete **** with how easy there character manages it.
Lastly, the visual effects of this film were pretty nice, although at times they could look a bit plain and out of proportion but overall the effects looked great and made for some really hectic action sequences.
The film is a fun comical ride but it hasn’t done anything new, and the main reason I’m guessing reviews are so high is probably because everyone is loving to get on the Marvel band wagon nowadays. I wouldn’t say avoid this film as it is enjoyable but don’t expect anything special. A worthwhile watch.
6.5/10
Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
6
brohugJul 20, 2015
Pretty tepid effort. Looks like the Marvel catalog pillaging by the studios is starting to expose the weaker source material. There is nothing innovative about the story or characters in this comic book outing. Evangeline Lilly is actuallyPretty tepid effort. Looks like the Marvel catalog pillaging by the studios is starting to expose the weaker source material. There is nothing innovative about the story or characters in this comic book outing. Evangeline Lilly is actually painful to watch in many scenes. Michael Douglas looks and sounds like Gordon Gecko hiding out from the IRS. Finally, Paul Rudd's smug charm should be pretty good in this sort of comic-con summer fare but it feels like he's struggling, even slightly disinterested. One positive: might be nice to see Michael Peña do more comedic material; at least he seemed to be enjoying himself.

This tired plot device of each film referencing other Marvel touchstones like the Avengers, Hydra, Stark Industries, etc. only works if those other films are successes in their own right. Not sure how many Ant-Man quips we will hear from Captain America.
Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
6
diogomendesJul 18, 2015
I thought "Ant-Man" was going to be last year's Guardians of the Galaxy, but I found myself disappointed while watching it. I was kind of bummed that this movie didn't go for the usual Marvel formula, but at least the movie did a good job inI thought "Ant-Man" was going to be last year's Guardians of the Galaxy, but I found myself disappointed while watching it. I was kind of bummed that this movie didn't go for the usual Marvel formula, but at least the movie did a good job in generating some laughs. And Paul Rudd's performance was appealing. I can't say there weren't parts that were particularly uninvolving but it got better over the second half of the movie. The villain is clearly one-note, and it doesn't seem like a character that anyone would like simply because he wears a badass yellow jacket (pun unintended). However, beyond the dazzling visuals, great cast and entertaining action, there was actually some easter eggs to be found, but the one that most excited me was the reference to Spider-Man in the end of the movie. As a Spidey fan, I'm looking forward to the new reboot produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Sony Pictures.

So... my take on "Ant-Man"? It was a solid movie, and if you're a fan of super-heroes, this film is watchable for you.

6.5/10.
Expand
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
6
MrMovieBuffJul 20, 2015
'Ant-Man' is a good old weekend entertainment for a film, a heist film if that's what you like.

The latest feature in the Marvel Cinematic Universe follows the story of a veteran hero named Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) who has created the
'Ant-Man' is a good old weekend entertainment for a film, a heist film if that's what you like.

The latest feature in the Marvel Cinematic Universe follows the story of a veteran hero named Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) who has created the technology of a suit that can shrink as well as the human being inside it. He needs a daring man to wear the suit and save his business from the evil Darren Cross (Corey Stoll) who is attempting to develop the similar kind of technology of shrinking suits.

The man Hank needs is Scott Lang (Paul Rudd, overflowing with charisma), what we know about Lang is that he has been arrested a few times for burglary and is trying to re-build a fading relationship with his daughter Cassie.

'Ant-Man' is more of a heist film than it is your typical, bombastic superhero film, ('Avengers: Age of Ultron'), but it's hard to stay mad when it gives you a great amount of character development and there is more substance than I thought there would be.

But why did I give it 6/10? This is mainly because there are many, many references to "The Avengers" which did feel forced and shoehorned into the film, this has something to do with the fact that Edgar Wright, who was tipped to direct but backed out because his vision of the film didn't have many references to the Avengers.

The villain was also very cliche and another forgettable one in the Marvel canon. The plot also resembles 'Iron Man' (2008), the idea of a businessman creating technology of a superior suit and there is another eager businessman creates a similar kind of technology to use it against them. Basically, it's a whole, "Apple iPhone vs Samsung Galaxy" story, and we have seen it before.

All in all, 'Ant-Man' is worth watching, it may not be the most superior entry to the Marvel canon, but fans will be satisfied.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
FilmPhonicJul 17, 2015
Bringing a character not well known outside of comic-book fandom into the Marvel Cinematic universe is a risk particularly considering the unique powers that ‘Ant-Man’ brings to the table scale-wise, but what it lacks in grandiose spectacularBringing a character not well known outside of comic-book fandom into the Marvel Cinematic universe is a risk particularly considering the unique powers that ‘Ant-Man’ brings to the table scale-wise, but what it lacks in grandiose spectacular set-pieces this movie makes up for with its very grounded comedic tone.
In part ‘Ant-man’ feels rather fittingly like a typical Paul Rudd comedy which happens to involve a heist and people dressing like superheroes which is where it’s at its most effective, but parallel to this runs a formulaic Marvel origin story that ticks all the necessary boxes without offering anything particularly memorable.

It seems like Marvel’s careful planning to ensure a family-friendly tone and narrative that adequately bleeds into the rest of the Marvel universe has resulted in a film that doesn’t take many risks, perhaps this is the cause and consequence of ‘Ant-man’s’ many production problems involving replacing directors and constantly changing scripts.

When risks are taken you get unique action sequences based on the comedic value of shrinking characters along with the heart of the film in Paul Rudd’s lead performance, backed up hilariously by his “Three Stooges-like” companions.

The Bottom Line…
Safe and sometimes clichéd, ‘Ant-man’ lacks the punch of some other Marvel outings but what it lacks in scale it makes up for in humour and charm, given all its production issues it seems like Marvel have done a commendable job in introducing a character that can quite literally slot into any space in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Expand
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
6
FilmGobJul 20, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Finally, Marvel's 'Ant-Man' has arrived, after what seems like a lifetime of promises and troubled development. More a low key and scaled down outing compared to 'Age of Ultron', it commits to a restrained approach, as it should, being an origin story centred around a heist concept.

First up, let's talk about the action. The effects were fantastic, even in the 2D screening i saw. The fight scenes are, although not mind blowing, more inventive and fun than what's been served in recent MCU releases. There are great uses of everyday environments and devices (bathtub, vacuum cleaner, record player) in the first shrinking scene. In the third act, we see our hero riding flying insects while dodging bullets, causing a giant Thomas the Tank Engine to crush a cop car, fighting Yellow Jacket in a briefcase while The Cure's 'Disintegration' plays on an iPhone (yes, all this happens).

How about the performances? Paul Rudd as the leading man is a good fit, a likeable down on his luck guy thrown into the battle between SHIELD and Hydra. Michael Douglas is great, and his relationship with Evangeline Lily is played out beautifully.

Now all that is fine, but there are problems that let the film down. In trying to keep the tone in line with the rest of the Marvel universe, there's a look of bland direction to much of it. Structure and pacing wise, at times it's too fast moving and later too drawn out. Try not to notice the score, which sounded like uninspired drivel. Another weak villain is introduced, this time played by Corey Stoll, almost a rehash of Jeff Bridges from 'Iron Man' but without the presence.

Marvel's basic **** humour once again rears it's ugly head at the most inappropriate moments. It's not clever, just unbelievably irritating. Michael Pena and his criminal colleagues are truly awful stereotypes here, too busy throwing around cliches like "dayumn" and "yo son" while the white heroes are saving the day. If you've read some of my other reviews on Marvel films, you know i don't let this kind of borderline racist crap pass!

At the end i was left wondering, is this a character that really needed a standalone film? Sure it's a welcome change of pace, however it's more filler than killer. The premise of a tiny hero who controls ants may seem problematic for some, but the real issue is that too many cooks have come and gone in the kitchen.
Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
6
SzenOct 3, 2015
It is funnier than it should be, even for a Marvel movie and the characters aren't anything special. In the end, "Ant-Man" is a nearly two hours movie but the exciting stuff is taking place in the second half of it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
HighBloodMageJul 17, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I watched ant-man earlier on today. First thing I notice is the movie mistake where pym punches the guy in the face bloody nose. Few camera angle changes and it's fine next thing you know stark hands the guy a tissue for the now yet again bloody nose. Not looking good. Well let's put aside the fact how wasp got very little scree time although I do like how they referenced the costume change from black and red to black yellow at this moment if you have seen the film but didn't watch the secret ending you'll be thinking what's this guy on about like many naive people who where in the cinema with me. Shame on you. Ok now it's time for yellow jacket. Yellow jacket was Hank pump in the comics which screws up the plot line with cross I got a few strange looks in the cinema when Yellowjacket was first introduced and I tried to claw m eyes out and the rest of the looks where in agreement with my pain. I mean how on earth does marvel turn this around thanks to the secret ending of avengers 2 we know that the suit stays in good hands so we knew how the fight was going to end or was just me putting far too much thought into it? Anyway the secret ending ruins the fact how pym used to be wasp for a short while. Not to mention no giant man / Goliath I mean what where they thinking! Who can put on a materminuplation suit in 10 seconds never mind 4! Oath and ohms line "your hitching a ride out side there 5 block perimeter" your the size of an ant they could have national guard waiting for you unless they are the size of an ant too it doesn't matter. And the helmet is meant to control the ants not an ear piece. Ramble finished as a movie it was decent as a comic book movie meh. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
preziJul 21, 2015
This is a solid movie no doubt .The visuals are perfect. No complaints about the special effects or the photography. The cast is also perfect. Michael Douglas does an awesome job as Dr. Hank Pym; Evangeline Lilly is really hot; and Paul RuddThis is a solid movie no doubt .The visuals are perfect. No complaints about the special effects or the photography. The cast is also perfect. Michael Douglas does an awesome job as Dr. Hank Pym; Evangeline Lilly is really hot; and Paul Rudd is Ant-Man, period! The weakness is in the script. It's uneven and spends too much time on Ant-Man's personal development and not enough on the villain, Darren Cross (Yellowjacket) played superbly by Corey Stoll. The movie does a poor job of expressing the urgency of preventing Cross from having Ant-Man's power. And because it spends so much time on Ant-Man's training, the movie starts to get tedious, albeit for a short time thank goodness.

Overall, I totally recommend this movie especially in 3D. I just wish the villain had been more developed so that I cared more about the climatic battle.
Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
6
DevilsndadetailJul 30, 2015
After the excellent CAtws marvel has fallen back into it's tedious grinding franchise ways again with AAOU and now Antman.

Marvel know Antman is a weak movie and seem to try to combat this with blundering references to all it's other
After the excellent CAtws marvel has fallen back into it's tedious grinding franchise ways again with AAOU and now Antman.

Marvel know Antman is a weak movie and seem to try to combat this with blundering references to all it's other movies, cameos, and end of credit scenes avid fans need to see to get ready for the next movie churned out of the franchise factory.

Clunky comedy, a dull lead, an even duller villain, and aptly a CGI and steals the show from the wooden cast. Only a cool Michael Douglas kept me interested as I sat there.

the best thing I can say about Antman is it's not as bad as Terminator Genisys.
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
6
StatlerWaldorfOct 27, 2015
I heard rumblings that this was supposed to be funnier, quirkier, et ceterier than other super hero movies in its family. It semi-delivered on this expectation, enough that it felt kind of fresh and made me wish other standalone hero moviesI heard rumblings that this was supposed to be funnier, quirkier, et ceterier than other super hero movies in its family. It semi-delivered on this expectation, enough that it felt kind of fresh and made me wish other standalone hero movies were equally entertaining (that is, about 23% more entertaining). The pacing is good in the first half and rushed in the second, which may be a consequence of the rewrites, who knows. Plenty goes unexplained but the pieces fit together nicely enough, a snug click but not an exciting clack. Michael Douglas beats the toy train for Official Highlight of the Film. Hank Pym has been conspicuously absence from the new Marvel movieland and I’d rather watch him ferreting around in a lab coat and telling people they’re full of **** for two hours than see another scientist fight his own ego while wearing a Mega Man suit. Watch Ant Man, it’s fun. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
YorkManFeb 10, 2016
Ant-Man is one of the Marvel comic universe's more obscure characters.... And there's a very good reason for that.
One of the biggest problems with Ant-Man, not just as a film, but as a character as a whole.... Is that his backstory, motives
Ant-Man is one of the Marvel comic universe's more obscure characters.... And there's a very good reason for that.
One of the biggest problems with Ant-Man, not just as a film, but as a character as a whole.... Is that his backstory, motives and development are things we've seen before. The annoying thing is that this is mainly down to the necessities of fitting the character into the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).

Unlike Captain America, where they took the comic's origin story and brought Cap' into the modern age via the 'frozen in ice for 70 years' idea, in Ant-Man they try to dispense with the original story altogether.

In this film, the 'Ant-Man' is effectively the second incarnation, the original being the 'old guy' scientist whose origin story would have been far more interesting. Instead we get a convoluted narrative that suggests a new 'Ant-Man' is needed to combat the machinations of the 'old guy' scientist's former assistant who is attempting to duplicate his miniaturisation processes.

What follows is a 30 minute training montage, involving more technology whose invention is never explained (i.e. the ability to control various species of ant), and then the 'surprise' discovery the young scientist is looking to sell miniaturisation tech to the army for profit, now he's worked out how to make things smaller....

Cue Ant-Man's heroic infiltration of the bad scientist's research facility, you know, the one bearing the name of the 'old guy' scientist who was ousted from the board etc. And the finale between Ant-Man and young scientist who has shrunk himself in his own combat suit.....

It's sooooooo predictable as to be patronising!

However, it's not all bad. Paul Rudd displays his usual comedic sensibilities as the 'hero', and Michael Douglas is also good as the 'old guy' scientist. Their interplay is very funny. Rudd's three criminal sidekicks are also good value, except that Michael Pena's Mexican Stereotype characterisations which do grate immensely very quickly!

Overall, it's a paint-by-numbers Superhero flick, but one that does benefit from a superior comic-interplay between the main characters.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
Rebecca31Nov 8, 2015
After Avengers 2 I have decided not to watch another Marvel movie with high expectations, that's exactly what happened with this and I can safely say that this is one of the best marvel movies I've seen in a while, sometimes the stand aloneAfter Avengers 2 I have decided not to watch another Marvel movie with high expectations, that's exactly what happened with this and I can safely say that this is one of the best marvel movies I've seen in a while, sometimes the stand alone films really are better. Surprisingly charming and very enjoyable, Paul Rudd fits the role of Ant-Man and alongside Michael Douglas and Corey Stoll the result is pure entertainment. Highly recommended and in case 2 hours wasn't enough there's two post credit sequences cause that's a thing now apparently. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
wolfkingdomOct 23, 2017
boring and uninteresting.almost every movie now is predictable,but at least some make it entertaining and makes you care about the characters.but not this movie.very average
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ChesterFTOFJan 31, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This review was previously posted on my blog, so apologies if bits don't make sense on another site!


Recently, I’ve been watching the MCU films again. This is mostly due to the run-up to Avengers 3. I haven’t felt the need to do reviews for most of them, but since my last post was semi-related to this film, I thought I might as well review it.

As mentioned in my previous post, Edgar Wright was briefly involved in this film. As a fan of his work, this naturally elevates the film for me. While I can’t know exactly what the director was involved with, you can still clearly see his fingerprints on the finished product. The editing is also brilliant at times, keeping the pacing of the film quick. A great soundtrack is present, and some comedy moments actually work, unlike my usual experience with recent Marvel movies. Unfortunately, the OST is a disappointment. This seems to be a frequent problem with most Marvel films. Can you, dear reader, remember an original song from a Marvel film? The only one people seem to be consistent with is the Avengers theme, which is rather odd; you have a cast of such varied and unique characters, and the music could really reflect that. Instead, songs feel like they could be taken from one film and added to another, and nobody would notice a difference.

The cinematography is decent enough. There’s rarely anything mind-blowing. Most of the highlights come from various jokes relating to the ever-changing size of the protagonist. Sharp cuts to reveal how mediocre the events occurring actually are happen frequently, and almost always to great effect.

The dialogue was middling. The film falls into a painful trap, where the mentor character dumps a full scene of exposition onto our uneducated protagonist. It’s rather frustrating given the fact that most viewers have already pieced the plot together. We don’t need a recap. Also, there’s various moments where lines are clumsily delivered. I don’t know it’s that’s due to the actors or the writers, but regardless, parts simply don’t work.

The actors in this film are also interesting. There’s very few poor performances, but at the same time, the writing can often let people down. Evangeline Lily is probably the most consistent of the performers, and Corey Stoll (ignoring the dodgy dialogue and poor writing) is perfectly fine as our antagonist.

Also, rather oddly, the film seems to slip between originality and cliches rather easily. Ant-Man relishes in the standard scenes of a ‘shrunken person’ film, with small things being scarier, almost being stepped on and apocalyptic baths all being present. At the same time, however, moments are peculiarly mature. The protagonist isn’t much of a hero. He’s a convicted criminal who’s just gotten out of jail. His partner has separated from him, and found a new lover, who is now acting as the father figure for their child. When I first watched the film, I expected it to end with Scott Lang (Paul Rudd)’s wife realising she really loves our protagonist, and has done all along. They’d get back together, and Scott would get full custody of his child again etc. Instead, it takes a far more mature route, and Scott finds a romantic interest of his own, while still remaining on good terms with his previous partner and her new lover.

Typically, the film has quite a few random issues. There’s a jarring absence of blood, despite characters being shot. There’s also moments where it’s clear we’re meant to be feeling some sort of emotion (and perhaps I’m just a sociopath) but I felt little to nothing at the ‘sad moments’. Also, the villain is simply awful. Again, however, this is annoyingly common with Marvel movies. Still, was a villainous Jeff Bezos the best they had to offer?

The film is ultimately bland, but perfectly serviceable. It’s an incredibly average Marvel movie, with depressing glimpses of real inspiration. I’ll give it a 6/10. If you’re a Marvel fan who’s yet to watch it, and are curious as to how important it is to the overarching MCU plot, I imagine you can skip it. The next film in the series, Captain America: Civil War does feature elements of this film, but it’s not really mandatory viewing. Still, if you have the time, there are worse ways to spend it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RaduAMar 28, 2019
60/100

  Umm ... whatever, I don't care ...   Annoying, very annoying characters. What the f#@! is with Luis and his gang? The rest of the characters are ok but the villain is so weak...   The action is ok, the heist is ok, the CGI is ok,
60/100

  Umm ... whatever, I don't care ...
  Annoying, very annoying characters. What the f#@! is with Luis and his gang? The rest of the characters are ok but the villain is so weak...
  The action is ok, the heist is ok, the CGI is ok, the jokes are... wait a little... they are not even ok, I haven't laughed at all.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
YungKangJun 18, 2018
As visual eye-candy, it's quite good. As a superhero film trying to stand out in a pantheon of ever-increasing numbers of such films, it's only decent.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DawdlingPoetNov 27, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I found this an amusing watch - it features some decent CGI and amusing plot elements - I wouldn't say it takes itself too seriously, thankfully as I'm not entirely keen on such superhero type films. This was categorised as an action comedy film, so I thought I'd give it a watch when it was on TV and I found it entertaining enough. I tried to second guess what might happen in the plot and there were one or two plot twists. Of course, like most superhero type films, it has the underdog element to it - it is a bit cheesy I suppose but I found it entertaining regardless.

Michael Douglas playing the doctor (Dr, Hank Pym) with some less than commendable goals in mind did well in being the main villainous type character, or certainly at first. I'm not sure if I've seen him play many such characters but he did well as the scheming type I'd say. Meanwhile, the main character of local criminal, average joy type Scott Lang is played by Paul Rudd and he also gave a pretty decent performance as a confused yet enthusiastic type. He does seem clueless and if I were in his shoes, I can understand why!.

I thought it was quite an engrossing film for a Marvel superhero type film - it reminded me a little of the early 1990s 'Honey I Shrunk The Kids films', only with better special effeects, for obvious reasons. I suppose its a bit (I said a bit!) like a sanitised kid friendly version of The Fly, in a sense, only the character becomes an ant, rather than a fly, obviously.

Its not a bad watch - not greatly memorable but not boring and with decent visual effects, I'd say this is a cautious 4 star watch overall. Its a little cheesy and possibly somewhat predictable but its an easy, light watch, which is not necessarily a bad thing.

Would I recommend it? if you like these sorts of films then yes. As a straight comedy film? no, not really. I wouldn't say its an all out action film as such either, although there are some decent scenes featuring action - its primarily a comic book/superhero film, with one or two morals in it but its not shoved down your throat too much. Hopefully this is enough to help you judge whether its worth you seeing it or not.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Luxas_9000Jul 2, 2020
This was smaller and more lighthearted MCU film. It was fun. Humor worked for the most part. Characters were likeable and actors did a good job (except Scott's crew). Characters had great chemistry and each one had an emotional core to them.This was smaller and more lighthearted MCU film. It was fun. Humor worked for the most part. Characters were likeable and actors did a good job (except Scott's crew). Characters had great chemistry and each one had an emotional core to them. Action was creative not in the presentation but in the smaller hero aspect was very creative especially climax. Story was predictable and film overall was cheesy. It had tonal problems like an emotional scenes and then joke. Villain started out kinda fun but then he turned into generic marvel villain. Film had no style. If Edgar Wright stayed at the project it would be much better. It was fun but standard nothing groundbreaking nothing awful. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Fatbob15Oct 21, 2022
The ant man movies fell very low budget in comparison to the other MCU movies, but it's stil ok, and the characters are likeable
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
PeteyPirahnaFeb 5, 2022
6/10
This was solid. (But the fact that the sequel has a higher average score than this film is sad to me)
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DarkwingSchmuckMar 13, 2022
Ant-Man is an at times funny, but wholly standard entry to the Marvel universe. Paul Rudd is great in the title role, and Michael Peña almost steals the show in his quirky sidekick role; however, a weak villain, unimaginative style, and aAnt-Man is an at times funny, but wholly standard entry to the Marvel universe. Paul Rudd is great in the title role, and Michael Peña almost steals the show in his quirky sidekick role; however, a weak villain, unimaginative style, and a useless sequence at the Avengers base -- which serves no other purpose than to remind you of the Avengers -- really hold the whole thing back. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Chriscorc876Apr 10, 2023
Ant-Man may not be the most
memorable superhero film in the
Marvel universe, but it's definitely worth a watch. Paul Rudd delivers a solid performance as Scott Lang, the charming and witty ex-con turned superhero. The action scenes are
Ant-Man may not be the most
memorable superhero film in the
Marvel universe, but it's definitely
worth a watch. Paul Rudd delivers a solid performance as Scott Lang, the charming and witty ex-con turned superhero. The action scenes are cleverly designed and offer a unique perspective on the world, as we see them from the ant-sized viewpoint. However, the film does fall short in terms of character development and emotional depth, which leaves the audience feeling somewhat disconnected from the story. Overall,
Ant-Man is an enjoyable and
lighthearted film that is perfect for a
casual movie night.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
YenAug 2, 2015
Genuinely funny moments but, ultimately, a sub-par film with a half-baked heist. If only it could have been a comedy with some action (a la Scott Pilgrim) rather than an action movie with some comedy. Standard Marvel money-maker.
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
5
JacobJul 18, 2015
Ant-Man is small, insignificant, and nothing special and if you are wondering who I am talking about the hero or the film both. I’m curious to see what the original script Edgar Wright wrote was because knowing him it would’ve been funny,Ant-Man is small, insignificant, and nothing special and if you are wondering who I am talking about the hero or the film both. I’m curious to see what the original script Edgar Wright wrote was because knowing him it would’ve been funny, smart, original, and madly entertaining. Instead, we are left with the most formulaic story Marvel’s ever written that while not bad has been seen before in several Marvel films. If the film had interesting characters like Guardians of the Galaxy or great action like Pacific Rim or The World’s End (seriously great action there) those flaws could be overlooked but unfortunately none of the characters are interesting and the film fails to do anything interesting with the heist premise or take advantage of the shrinking concept to provide creative action and visuals. As a result, Ant-Man comes across the way The Incredible Hulk, Thor, and Captain America come across for some people it just exists to set up another Marvel movie. Similar to The Wolverine, the end credits scene, the second one as the first one reveals something obvious, teases a bigger and more interesting movie and hopefully that makes up for it because if this is the approach Marvel will take to all non-Avengers films going forward then I grow increasingly worried about how they will treat future additions such as Dr. Strange and Spider-Man. Die hard Marvel fans will probably be satisfied with the film as the loud family behind me was but those looking for something special will not find it here just sneak in for the end credits scene, the only good part of the film, and/or wait for the DVD if you are curious. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
5
TyranianApr 11, 2019
I found this more tedious than fun, Rudd is fine but the writing is so childish its hard to care.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
mmweissAug 3, 2015
With a script that seems more interested in the MCU as a franchise than the film itself,"Ant-Man" commits the one sin an action-adventure movie cannot: it's boring.
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews