Annihilation

6

CathexisArcanaMar 27, 2018

I like to keep my reviews brief and in list form, so I will assume the reader has a basic understanding of the movie's plot and and an awareness of the main cast. PROS:

-Interesting concept, and has at least a good sense of mystery at theI like to keep my reviews brief and in list form, so I will assume the reader has a basic understanding of the movie's plot and and an awareness of the main cast. PROS:

-Interesting concept, and has at least a good sense of mystery at the beginning. I like the general idea of a phenomenon causing rapid mutations / evolution in a contained area.

-Solid cast (if not entirely accurate, ahem). Although Gina Rodriguez was weirdly channeling Michelle Rodriguez for some reason. Still, it's Jane, so it's fine.

-There was a moment with a certain mutant bear that was genuinely creepy AF. Also, slithering intestines.

CONS:

-The backstory of Lena (Portman) is slow and nuanced to the point of being boring. She and her husband (Isaac) don't really have strong enough chemistry in the beginning to make us care about their relationship and what happens to them -- or at least I didn't.

-The visual look of the "Shimmer" was not effectively alien to me. It just seemed like a soapy, rainbow-hued veneer, like something you would see in a music video.

-Portman's ragtag team were not interesting or developed (even as supporting characters), and there was very little interplay between them to provide a reason to care what happened to them.

-The ending, while visually interesting, was entirely unsatisfying and inexplicable. Then again, I'm not a fan of the pretentious "so vague it's genius" tactic that some high-minded movies aim for. But the alien mime-off was still kinda cool...… Expand

7 of 8 users found this helpful71

All this user's reviews

9

alejandro970Mar 25, 2018

Excels the previous Garland opus -Ex machina- with a sci-fi story that reminds and blends witty The invasion of body snatchers and H. P. Lovecraft The colour out of space. A good choice for a weekend evening.

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

8

CineAutoctonoMar 24, 2018

"Annihilation" was a film that despite being heavy to watch, so boring and dark, has a good potential to be a great movie. Natalie Portman achieves another good role in her palmarés of actress, she becomes the center of attention of the film"Annihilation" was a film that despite being heavy to watch, so boring and dark, has a good potential to be a great movie. Natalie Portman achieves another good role in her palmarés of actress, she becomes the center of attention of the film and the key to the construction of the film. The photography is very good and the special effects spectacular. The story is very slow and boring, but very constructive and artistic.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

WhiskeyStoriesMar 23, 2018

Annihilation is a film of beautiful contradictions. It's the most boring and most fascinating film I've seen in 2018 so far. The first half is dry as all hell (kind of a chore to get through), but the second half truly makes up for it in itsAnnihilation is a film of beautiful contradictions. It's the most boring and most fascinating film I've seen in 2018 so far. The first half is dry as all hell (kind of a chore to get through), but the second half truly makes up for it in its underlying themes, tension and creativity in f#cked-upness (the bear scene is absoluetly terrifying). The symbolisms are left to your own interpretation, yet some of the clues are extremely on the nose; the writing is sloppy, but genius at the same time etc. - the list goes on and on, but the most important aspect of it is that it leaves a really strong impression. This film will be remembered for years to come that's for sure. Annihilation is not perfect, but it is a damn good piece of hard sci-fi.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

2

Chriss6277Mar 22, 2018

This is the perfect example of a flashy movie that tries way to hard to prove that is something more and deeper than that. Very predictable and unoriginal.
Appreciated efforts in special effects but not enough to save the movie.

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

9

TheRussianatorMar 21, 2018

Directed by Alex Garland, this unique sci-fi thriller is filled with top notch performances from Natalie Portman and Jennifer Jason Leigh and an amazing finale

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

RoccosRantMar 21, 2018

Great Sci-Fi movie. Keeps you guessing until the end. Visuals are spectacular with creature design that rivals any Hollywood blockbuster out there.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

thefressMar 20, 2018

I cannot stress enough the importance of repeated viewing of this movie. It’s not that it’s the most genius piece of film ever caught on camera, but it is intentionally packed with details that go unnoticed upon one’s first watch, detailsI cannot stress enough the importance of repeated viewing of this movie. It’s not that it’s the most genius piece of film ever caught on camera, but it is intentionally packed with details that go unnoticed upon one’s first watch, details that emphasize the movie’s themes and help develop the main players featured throughout. In a way, the story isn’t dissimilar to that of Garland’s directorial debut, „Ex Machina“. In E.M., one is presented with a moral dilemma of sorts: does the viewer root for the human or the machine, both of which gain one’s sympathy but have very different agendas? „Annihilation“ plays out similarly, only in a much different way and on a grander scale. I’m not going to go into any specific details here, but after three viewings, I can safely say that this is one of my favorite movies to be released in years. Anchored by a typically strong performance by Natalie Portman, whose complex character work ranks among some of her best work in years, a brilliantly understated score by Portishead/ Invada Records mastermind Geoff Barrow and Ben Salisbury, as well as gorgeous visuals and cinematography, „Annihilation“ is a head scratcher that keeps you coming back for more - and not necessarily out of a desire to understand the mysteries surrounding Area X and the shimmer; it’s a story of death (both physically and metaphorically) and the budding of new life under the most extreme of circumstances. It gives as much as it takes. Easy 9/10.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

4

DamnedThingMar 20, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Another one of those what ifs that could have been so much better with a more experienced director. One of the problems with Garland is that he's idolised as a voice of a generation and so carries a weight of expectation on anything he puts his hand to. Along with that, there's more a hint of fawning from British reviewers - so knock at least a star off Empire and Guardian reviews.

Ex Machina was relatively tight, set in a confined space with few characters, it did pose some good questions on AI, humanity, and ego, before setting them aside to focus on manipulation and thrills.

Annihilation is broader in scope but less interesting, less well structured, and confused about what it wants to be; tonally it shifts all over the place. It begins with a meteorite hitting earth. It carries a life form that replicates and mutates across species, as well as between plant and animal. Its effects are spreading outwards from the point of impact at an increasing rate, and the edge of its area of influence can be seen as a shimmer. Teams of people have gone into the 'shimmer', but none have ever come out.

Then one man does, except there's something wrong with him: he's bleeding internally and apparently close to dying. His wife joins up with a team going into the Shimmer in order to get to the source in the hopes that she'll find something that will help.

This is all standard fare for Science Fiction - it's kind of The Andromeda Strain meets War of the Worlds meets Contact meets Alien meets Deliverance; the basic set up could be told in minutes, but it takes forever to get its arse in gear. That's a big part of the problem, the film can't decide what tone to take - it starts off as a drama, then tries to switch up gears to being an adventure into the unknown before switching gears again to survivor horror before going for something trippy.

It just doesn't gel as a whole story, it's more a collection of influences strung together in a manner that's less than the sum of its parts.

Natalie Portman does well with a character who has to be strong enough to survive but who seems too often to be asked to play her part as over-wrought. She's fearless bringing down sharkgator, but that moment is the only one where she seems in command of herself.

Jennifer Jason Leigh rasps her way through things with scene stealing disinterest, which is at least notable. Everyone else is cardboard thin so that by the time they start disappearing one by one, as people in these things are wont to do, it's impossible to care either way.

Aside from Sharkgator there's a Cowbear auditioning for a sequel to the Revenant but it fails because it makes our 13yo boy laugh - this scene goes on far too long and is so clumsily handled that any necessary tension for it to work is lost in a miasma of hohumness. There's another faux Alien bit that's supposedly gory, but again the fakery can be seen a mile off so that when things happen there's no shock or disgust. The idea of an alien virus mutating DNA is interesting, but here it's just used as background wallpaper onto which has been slapped a generic story about a group of red shirts on a mission where things go wrong and they die one by one until there's a lone survivor left. The more interesting story to me was what was happening with Oscar Isaacs character. He turns up bleeding internally on the brink of dying but somehow manages to survive for months - what happened there? Was he being studied? Did they find a 'cure'? He's obviously been quarantined so they must have done tests, even at a cellular level there must have been some discrepancies? How come neither of them turned into tree people?

There are no shocks. There's no horror. It's a bit gory in one scene. There are no thrills at all. The pacing is clunky. It looks very pretty in one or two places.

This isn't so much a deliberately slow-paced film as a low energy one consumed by indecision. Paramount dodged a bullet by Netflixing it.

Meh!… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

3

wandering_droneMar 19, 2018

I has so hype for this movie because i read the book that this movie is, SUPPOSEDLY, inspired. I loved the book and i was hoping for a stunnig movie from the directer of the Ex-machina (one of my favoriete movie from 2014). What i get is oneI has so hype for this movie because i read the book that this movie is, SUPPOSEDLY, inspired. I loved the book and i was hoping for a stunnig movie from the directer of the Ex-machina (one of my favoriete movie from 2014). What i get is one visual good movie but with the content of one pseudo-intellectual **** movie. That ending was a **** mess. For the people who didn't read the book (which was completely set aside by Alex Garland), you don't have any idea of a great movie you could have had. The character of the biologist is so great in the book, but in the movie it was a **** cliche of a character. All the structure of the book, and the misteries of the area X are but better that in the movie. I know my opinion is greatly influnced by my apreciacion of the book, but, i assure you, that if most people had read the book the score of this movie was way lower.
ps(sorry for my english)… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

10

Minh18121999Mar 19, 2018

Visually Stunning,Creepy as hell with captivating performances,great twists and unique score.Alex Garland has created one of the most original films that is intense,brutal,emotional weight and i had a blast from start to finish.Definitely theVisually Stunning,Creepy as hell with captivating performances,great twists and unique score.Alex Garland has created one of the most original films that is intense,brutal,emotional weight and i had a blast from start to finish.Definitely the best Sci Fi films since Blade Runner 2049… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

2

Jes1310Mar 19, 2018

I loved ExMachina, which i tought was surprising, dark and added some new things to the sci-fi genre. This movie tries but never succeeds in the same things. The plot is poor, effects are ok (but nothing more) and the overall impression isI loved ExMachina, which i tought was surprising, dark and added some new things to the sci-fi genre. This movie tries but never succeeds in the same things. The plot is poor, effects are ok (but nothing more) and the overall impression is that this is just garbage. The first 30 minutes are irrelevant and could easyli have been edited out, without and effect on the movie.
Many times they do not follow up on earlier scenes and things just happen for no reason what so ever.
And without spoiling anything…. Are they afraid of sailing….

Netflix really needs to step up. Animated Carbon, Mute, Cloverfield Paradox and Bright have all been really poor movies. And I had some hopes for Annihilation, but this was just as terrible. Using are loosing it Netflix, and please step up asap.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

7

thedaywalkerMar 19, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I think it's a solid good movie.

It's premise keeps it interesting, with yet another fresh look at what an alien invasion could be. Natalie Portman and Jennifer Jason Leigh were terrific, but other characters failed the get the attention they deserved. Josie (Tessa Thompson) is a great example of this, for most of the movie, seems like she is just there.

The score is beautiful, it just keeps you hooked. They just knew exactly what to give you in every single scene

The ending was so well directed, so well choreographed, the mirror scene between Lena (Natalie Portman) and the Alien was great, and it plays out well in the end where you don't know who exactly got out, the alien or Lena.

Very slow at times even more than needed and some visuals are very unclear, together with the explanation of the mutations and the flowers, maybe if i watch it again i'll understand, but at first i didn't understand 1 thing

I hope Alex Garland keeps making good movies like this… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

0

zaksommerfieldMar 18, 2018

This film is a plotless mess that takes some of the weirdness from the book but removes literally all of the story. More an impressionist painting then a film. Skip it.

5 of 17 users found this helpful512

All this user's reviews

8

MaxPayneIsGodMar 18, 2018

An intriguing, thought provoking Sci-Fi thriller guaranteed to keep you thinking after the final scene. An unsettling and (almost) original concept with some genuine shocks and a good dose of horror. The casting was a bit questionable, notAn intriguing, thought provoking Sci-Fi thriller guaranteed to keep you thinking after the final scene. An unsettling and (almost) original concept with some genuine shocks and a good dose of horror. The casting was a bit questionable, not Miss Portman's best work, Jennifer Jason-Leigh was a miscast based on talent alone, and Oscar Issac was underused (again) I really enjoyed it, but a sequel is unnecessary.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

3

RockydogMar 17, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I usually like Scifi. However, keeping in mind that this is fiction there has to be some logic in the movie. For instance if small groups of soldiers kept disappearing why didn't they just send in like 200 tanks at once? Or since the Lighthouse is on the coast, why not approach from the sea? Also they were woefully under-equipped. How about for instance illumination flares? or something heavier than an M-16? I'm a Biologist and I can tell you that the "Biology" in the movie is simply a joke. 99.99999999999% of mutations are fatal. Finally, the acting was just terrible. All of it.… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

7

Mafia1Mar 17, 2018

The visuals are stunning. The plot not so much. The take of not explaining or simplifying keeps you curious. the gory stuff is just about right. a new idea at least for me that an alien invasion will not be about guns and destruction can beThe visuals are stunning. The plot not so much. The take of not explaining or simplifying keeps you curious. the gory stuff is just about right. a new idea at least for me that an alien invasion will not be about guns and destruction can be so much more scarier and invisible and uncontrollable.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

0

cinewatcherMar 17, 2018

I started to see watch this movie, but stopped halfway towards the end. It was confusing, going back and forth, and took a while to give you the plot. Part of the movie was already done many times before - start with a group of people, andI started to see watch this movie, but stopped halfway towards the end. It was confusing, going back and forth, and took a while to give you the plot. Part of the movie was already done many times before - start with a group of people, and one-by-one they get killed. Why the rest of the soldiers would stay around is beyond me. I'm surprised that so many reviewers gave this movie high number reviews!… Expand

4 of 12 users found this helpful48

All this user's reviews

3

OrcfleshMar 17, 2018

This would have died at the box office, not because as some reviews suggest because its too avant garde ...but because its boring.
The characters are expendable and are devoid of any personality.
These are supposed to be intellegent people,This would have died at the box office, not because as some reviews suggest because its too avant garde ...but because its boring.
The characters are expendable and are devoid of any personality.
These are supposed to be intellegent people, but there decisions make no sense.
The actors try their best with a terrible script, but for all their efforts they cant salvage anything.
The story is predictable and formulaic.
The indoor sets are low quality, which is a stark contrast to the great open locations.
The green screen and CGI are poor in general throughout the movie,but more care seems to have gone into the effects in the climax.
There seems to be a trend among 'professional' reviewers at the moment, where anything they can latch onto and call cerebral is touted as a new dawn in cinema and a modern classic.
I assure you, this is not that movie… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

2

bobbymcdMar 17, 2018

Slow and boring. Watching it was almost torturous. Can't believe this is getting good reviews. One of the worst films I've seen in some time.

I think some critics are mistaking somber vagueness for profundity.

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

5

RealMuthaFMar 17, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. After "Ex Machina" I expected more from director Alex Garland. Annihilation is pretentious, boring and ultimately style over substance.

The premise itself is intriguing - there is an expanding supernatural Zone out of which nobody has returned, except for Natalie Portman's husband, who appears to have no memory of prior events. Portman herself is a university professor who presumed her husband dead.

However, everything goes downhill really quick. First, literally on the 3rd minute of the movie we are shown a comet hitting a lighthouse, which immediately eliminates any mystery regarding the Zone's origins, as it's clearly extraterrestrial. Then we are led to believe that the Zone has been expanding for 3 years already. And what has the government organization overseeing it done in the meantime? Perhaps, send a large-scale military/scientific expedition with lots of gear and vehicles? Well no Sir! They have only sent a few small teams, none of which ever communicate or come back. So, by the movie's events, the current squad consists of 5 suicidal women who barely have any relevant skills for the mission. And while all are "scientists", the only person who tries to do some research is Portman, who at least takes biological samples along the way.

And how our 5 girl-scouts act once they enter the zone is unspeakable. They go in without any protective gear(!) and only M4s for weapons(!!), with only Portman having prior shooting experience(!!!), follow no plan and just wander around wasting time(!!!!) and leave no marks to be able to find their way back, as GPS and even compasses don't work(!!!!!).

Besides the sci-fi-ish premise, the movie also has some horror elements, so there are obligatory scenes of a team member being snatched from behind, and one team member losing their mind and acting hostile towards others. The latter scene looks very lame, by the way. There is some suspense in the film, but not enough of it.

While Annihilation has some pretty, albeit low-budget, imagery, the story feels like its writer just came up with some creepy moments but didn't care to stitch them together in any sensible way. There isn't any sense in Thessa Thompson's turning into some sort of discount Poison Ivy and disappearing. There isn't any sense or consistency in the CG-alien's actions. Why has it "entered" Jennifer Jason-Leigh and obliterated her? Why hasn't it done so with Portman, and played some copycat game instead? The alien core can be burned to the ground with a single phosphorus grenade, really? Why didn't Isaac's duplicate (whose reveal was as obvious and predictable as possible) also burn down, while all the other alien constructs were destroyed?

The answer to all those questions is because the writer did a sh***y job, that's why. Unfortunately, Annihilation is a disappointment.… Expand

5 of 5 users found this helpful50

All this user's reviews

4

OlivierPielMar 17, 2018

A mediocre effort to revisit Stalker by Tarkovsky. While the Russian master used Tchernobyl and the possibilities of supernatural phenomena to make us dream and dance around epistemology, the concept of nature and art, Hollywood only knowsA mediocre effort to revisit Stalker by Tarkovsky. While the Russian master used Tchernobyl and the possibilities of supernatural phenomena to make us dream and dance around epistemology, the concept of nature and art, Hollywood only knows the ham-fisted, immature and naïve approach. In one scene, Portman stumbles on a couple of deer/antilopes with flowering antlers (DNA echoes itself to create hybrids or alter egos) in the cliched moment of "this world can be beautiful too, you see"). This is supposed to pass as art despite the fact that many 6 year old have come up with the exact concept with her unicorns. Compare this with the scene of Stalker where the three learned men and the stalker fall asleep near a brook where human artifacts lay submerged under algae; a moment of exquisite melancholy.

Only the end sequence in the lighthouse has a brilliant visual scene. Jennifer Jason Leigh is also excellent, her impatience and taciturn air seem directed as much as the other characters than as to the whole enterprise… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

7

GunnerMcDaggetMar 17, 2018

This movie is very much a love/hate affair. On one hand the movie gives you amazing visual effects, an interesting premise, stellar performances by the mainly female cast, and excellent direction... On the other hand we have lazy writing, noThis movie is very much a love/hate affair. On one hand the movie gives you amazing visual effects, an interesting premise, stellar performances by the mainly female cast, and excellent direction... On the other hand we have lazy writing, no commitment to an actual conclusion, and no explanation of what any of it had to do with anything.

TLDR; a great movie let down by terrible writing.

Definitely worth a watch but don't expect much depth from the shallow story line.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

zapVMar 17, 2018

Mysterious and sometimes terrifying movie about people facing tragedy and their psychological journey in attempt to overcome it and face the dark, cruel side of nature.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

cas514Mar 16, 2018

good set up, good horror'sci-fi ideas, bad execution...Terrible casting with Natalie Portman, Im suppose to believe she spent 7 years in the army yet she looks like she can barely handle a sandwich. Yeah no.. The rest of the cast was wastedgood set up, good horror'sci-fi ideas, bad execution...Terrible casting with Natalie Portman, Im suppose to believe she spent 7 years in the army yet she looks like she can barely handle a sandwich. Yeah no.. The rest of the cast was wasted and not given enough to do. Should of casted someone that atleast looks like they can hold a machine gun.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

8

GBG_JasonMar 16, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Love him or hate him, Alex Garland has become popular in the sci-fi and horror community for penning thought provoking films for a number of years. While some of his works have been masterpieces (28 Days Later), others have been commercial and critical bombs (Sunshine). Garland’s latest work, Annihilation, falls somewhere in between.

The film follows Natalie Portman (Black Swan, The Star War Prequel Trilogy) as Lena, a biologist and former Army vet who embarks into what is called the Shimmer. The Shimmer is a mysterious area that appears to reflect light from the outside akin to the colorful patterns you’d see when light shines through a bubble. The entity landed 3 years prior to the film in a southern region of the US and is slowly growing. Every team, electronic device, and animal sent into it has never been heard from again. That is, until Lena’s husband was sent in and returns after being thought dead for a year. Soon after his return, Kane, played by Oscar Isaac (X-Men Apocalypse, Ex Machina), is rushed to the ER after acting extremely strange. He is then transported with his wife to a hidden base just outside of the mysterious environment. In an effort to find out what is wrong with her husband, Lena heads out with a new team in the hopes of unraveling the mystery of the Shimmer.

As the team sets off on foot into the bubble (which perplexed me as to why they did not use some sort of tank or hovercraft), they see that the Shimmer is changing the flora and fauna in dreamlike (or nightmare-ish) ways. Literally, everything that the Shimmer has touched, even abandoned homes and shacks which grow a strange type of mold or moss, have been modified. Flowers that stem from the same root systems will bloom in various flower patterns, and animals feature new defensive and terrifying features to the point they are barely recognizable. In addition to this, the team keeps experiencing a severe loss of time as well as vivid dreams which may be hallucinations, but the film never is clear on this. While we only get insight into the ones experienced by Lena, the rest of the group does mention experiencing similar situations. These story devices are used sparingly and typically offer more insight to Portman’s character, but also cause the film to lose momentum here and there.

The CGI visuals depicting the changes are acceptable and occasionally stunning, although certain creatures, especially those at the end of the film, look somewhat dated. Others, such as one featured heavily in the midpoint of the film, look downright terrifying. The worst part of the visuals are very much like recent episodes of The Walking Dead; a green screen method is used for a backdrop in almost every scene, giving most of the film a “soap opera” look. While it does paint a pretty picture, it’s often a bit too distracting.

The opening of the film hurts the overall story quite a bit – seeing Lena in the facility wearing what looks like prison garbs gives away a lot of the film, since the remaining team’s fate is put out there for the viewer within the first few minutes. The omission of these details would have given the film a much needed boost to the tension, as it does lull at times. The acting pushes the characters outside of the token roles found in the genre, but knowing the rest of the team will die makes it hard to grow attached to them.A

Much like the opening, the ending will divide or disappoint many viewers as it leaves the fate of a few of the surviving characters open to interpretation. Like many of Garland’s other works, the film questions what it is to be human and if some of our worst traits are by choice or incorporated into our DNA, and whether we are self-destructive by nature or if we are this way due to our environment. I found the ending to be fitting, while my wife was a bit let down. Much like the recent Mother!, which I loved and my wife (along with most of the world) hated, the ending will probably define your thoughts on the film.

With a few pacing issues and occasional poor CGI, Annihilation doesn’t break new ground for the genre, but it does ask some thought provoking questions about what it is to truly be human. If you’re a fan of the horror sci-fi genre, this film should not be missed.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

8

jzornotMar 16, 2018

Well, now we know where Paddindton comes from. I mean it means perfect sense: he is a talking bear who can make marmalade. He also tends to walk through shimmery screens and lives somewhere which looks quite similar to the zone.
As to theWell, now we know where Paddindton comes from. I mean it means perfect sense: he is a talking bear who can make marmalade. He also tends to walk through shimmery screens and lives somewhere which looks quite similar to the zone.
As to the movie, the atmosphere draws you in. I didn't really notice how well the actors perfored which for me is a good thing for this type of movie. Overall it's mildly new to the general audience who is typically not into this genre. The clifhanger at thiend was over the top though.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

7

ernis_vMar 16, 2018

Part Stalker, part Ghostbusters, part the Twilight Saga Soundtrack, part The Tree of Life, part Alien.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

bigscreen454Mar 16, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Annihilation on the surface sounds more violent than it actually is but there are some gore moments like when a woman with a lot of feminine angst takes a machine gun and blows away a giant mutant alligator. Let me tell you if you are ever wondering whether Natalie Portman can handle a machine gun I can answer you the affirmative yes and it is quite cool. Make no mistake, it’s an Estrogen pumped film, and with a strong-willed female protagonist that perhaps could win an Oscar as well. Natalie Portman’s performance is outstanding and supporting characters did a good job as well. Some of the characters go psycho but I guess that’s to be expected when you encounter too many flowers and rainbows. This all-lady team sent out to achieve success ‘where no man has gone before’ (and achieved success) didn’t end too well. They go out to the danger zone to solve the mystery and things take a turn for the worse. The five women collectively hit menopause at the same time on a ‘very bad day’, and meet stressors such as a Mutant Aligator and Giant Bear with a skull head. This and many other unfortunate events remind us that Dorothy is not in Kansas anymore. The visuals were outstanding. Complete with rainbow anamorphic flares, this scifi film was a visual treat and something different and more interesting than the most recent scifi films. Natalie’s CG alter ego is taller than her, I get that everyone wants to be taller but this was a bit much, Natalie is a ‘shortie’. The special effects of the alter ego were done well and obviously very high budget. The set design was overwhelmingly cool. Very creative flowers and foliage really added to the environment and feel of the film.

Overall I’d say it’s good storytelling and the film kept my attention which is sometimes difficult to do with adult ADHD onset so early, so 8 out of 10 stars for an engaging film.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

7

JLuis_001Mar 15, 2018

I don't usually read many reviews of so-called ''professional critics'' because several times they don't manage to be as objective as I would like and in many cases they practically tell you the whole movie, but incredibly I was saturatedI don't usually read many reviews of so-called ''professional critics'' because several times they don't manage to be as objective as I would like and in many cases they practically tell you the whole movie, but incredibly I was saturated with Facebook and Twitter notes about opinions of this film and an interesting pattern was highlighted, and almost all mentioned the same: ''Annihilation, the film that was too smart for the audiences.''

To mention the distribution method the film got it seems irrelevant by now, it's already on Netflix so there's nothing to do anymore. I admit the film would had been a box office failure to have achieved a release in theaters worldwide but that has nothing to do with the film being ''too smart'' for the regular public, but it's because the film is indeed far from any mainstream standard.

I find ridiculous to label Annihilation as a film too smart for the masses, first because it's not and second because mentioning that kind of things is why these types of non-commercial films are completely ignored. By assuming that the product is smarter than the consumer this will inevitably catalog the product as snobbish and pretentious because by assuming the consumers didn't understand the film then you're automatically calling them stupid, even if it's not the case. That is why today ''professional critics'' are already considered tremendously irrelevant.

But speaking of the film, I must say the plot is quite interesting but far from complex, in addition to the fact that the film spoils at the beginning what happened to the characters, it takes away all the mystery to the subject because you no longer feel any link with them, you're just waiting to see what will happen to them and therefore all the narrative and character development is practically null.
Apparently all them have their secrets and dark sides but none of that is explored and therefore when they start to disappear from the screen and from the story you couldn't care less. But at least the most important mystery remains intact and it directs the film until its ending.

Of the cast only Natalie Portman has a real acting weight, the rest of the cast is disposable, I'm sorry but it's true, even Oscar Issac who despite being the trigger of the journey Portman's character, has no real relevance except with the ending.

I really liked the soundtrack, the cinematography, I listened to a lot of complaints about the CGI but I think that if you consider its budget it was quite decent, the production design is also of a very good level, it immerses you in the situation and becomes a real complement to the story.

At the end of the day I think Annihilation is a good movie, it's interesting and entertaining, not so satisfying but rewarding, personally I prefer Garland's debut; Ex Machina but I would recommend the film to anyone without hesitation and I would definitely tell them that it's not too smart for them.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

2

raporgiMar 13, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Its Alien and then some through the eyes of hack derivative director Alex Garland. Its boring and unentertaining. Garland pads out this crapbird with all sorts pointless musings. Portman gets blacked and via guilty conscience follows in the footsteps of her husband. Syfy channel level effects and not enough interesting goings on. Predictably the women turn on each other at various points in the movie only to get slaughtered.Dont waste your time its not even funny.… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

8

oac1982Mar 15, 2018

Far from the usual blockbuster, the film is introspective and heavy with its enervating atmosphere.
Don´t expect jump scares, you´ll find none here (maybe one). Instead, you have a tense plot that leaves you wandering what´s going to happenFar from the usual blockbuster, the film is introspective and heavy with its enervating atmosphere.
Don´t expect jump scares, you´ll find none here (maybe one). Instead, you have a tense plot that leaves you wandering what´s going to happen next (or even what´s going on "right now").… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

1

DragonSEGMar 15, 2018

Far too slow of a story. I thought it would pick up when they entered the shimmer, but I was wrong. There were a few parts that made me think that maybe it would become worth it. Those parts, sadly, were few. I guess I think that if itFar too slow of a story. I thought it would pick up when they entered the shimmer, but I was wrong. There were a few parts that made me think that maybe it would become worth it. Those parts, sadly, were few. I guess I think that if it has 'Action' as a listed genre, it should have, well... action. This felt like a college lecture when the professor is half asleep.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

4

VDSMar 14, 2018

This started off in a very average fashion and went quickly downhill. The people in charge might have been under the impression they were making a ‘think piece’, but not so. This was Sci-Fi by numbers and lucky to even find a home onThis started off in a very average fashion and went quickly downhill. The people in charge might have been under the impression they were making a ‘think piece’, but not so. This was Sci-Fi by numbers and lucky to even find a home on Netflix.

It reminded me a bit of Arrival, insomuch as it was right up itself and adrift at sea on a plot of vapid tripe.

Natalie Portman’s unfortunate cohorts were just there as cannon fodder, to be gobbled up by a not unimpressive beasty. But this wasn’t the thrust of the story, which instead centred around a mysterious lighthouse (Scooby-Doo where are you?), a secret government ops team, missing soldiers and gene mixing aliens. Sound stupid? That’s because it was.

But the best stuff came at the end with super nonsense overdrive and some truly daft scenes between Natalie and the lighthouse keeper.

If you’ve watch the Netflix Cloverfield and then Mute, you’ll know what level of film making craft to expect here. But at least it wasn’t as bad as the uber-ultra hyped not in the least bit scary Veronica, which must surely win the inaugural Netflix Razzie prize.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

2

geodeoMar 14, 2018

Terrible film - watching a all female cast is as interesting as watching an all male cast (sarcasm). Film has no real build up of suspense, characters that are stereotype and where the acting is obvious and the only interesting component isTerrible film - watching a all female cast is as interesting as watching an all male cast (sarcasm). Film has no real build up of suspense, characters that are stereotype and where the acting is obvious and the only interesting component is rushed in the last 10 minutes rather than exploring the topic in depth. For such a nihilistic title - the reasoning behind the visit seems more plausible, realistic and less menacing than the spectacular headline.

A fail unless quotas for all female cheesy sci fi is important to your viewing pleasure.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

5

DodgerMar 14, 2018

This felt like a film that had potential, but squandered it in a weird predicatable twist and an overly arty last 10-15 minutes. Some of the effects and scenes were really well done, offset by some weird story line focuses and glaring andThis felt like a film that had potential, but squandered it in a weird predicatable twist and an overly arty last 10-15 minutes. Some of the effects and scenes were really well done, offset by some weird story line focuses and glaring and frequent plot holes.

If youv got Netflix and you like sci-fi give it a watch, seeing as its free, otherwise you can safely give it a miss.… Expand

5 of 5 users found this helpful50

All this user's reviews

1

Qgal5kapMar 14, 2018

This was pretty bad... It's quite boring, so you'd better have something else to do while watching. Like sorting nuts and bolts, or wrapping coils for your e-cig.

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

8

DubeauMar 14, 2018

One of the rare movie that mix well horror and sci-fi together. The story is one of discovery, some fascinating. The actors and actress are pretty well balanced in their performance. No overacting here. The music helps a lot. It's eerie andOne of the rare movie that mix well horror and sci-fi together. The story is one of discovery, some fascinating. The actors and actress are pretty well balanced in their performance. No overacting here. The music helps a lot. It's eerie and mystical. Visually the FX is quite colourful, sometimes stunning or just well placed for a good effect. You get engage in Lena story, mainly because Portman is taking us slowly with her. There is a lot that is not explain in the movie and with it's peoples. That makes the film feels more real. I give it an 85%. Absolutely loved it.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

8

ElWrayMar 14, 2018

Annihilation is a movie I personally needed. In more general terms, I think it show's everyone how a great movie is made. Great cast of characters. It's mostly female, but it does it in class. Never does it feel like it wants to beAnnihilation is a movie I personally needed. In more general terms, I think it show's everyone how a great movie is made. Great cast of characters. It's mostly female, but it does it in class. Never does it feel like it wants to be "culturally important" but it just tells a story where the main characters 'just so happen' to be women. The acting and writing overall was mature and left a lot to the imagination. Besides that the visuals and score (oh my god that score) were mind blowing. Besides that I think it's best if you go in blank en just experience it for yourself to make your own conclusions. In the end I think that, when everyone forgot about Marvel movies in the next decade, this one will still be fondly remembered by artists, creative people, people who have the ability to enjoy and understand abstraction and intellectual theme's. It's very high on my list of 'best of the decade' so far. Would recommend it to anyone, but it's a must see for fans of good sci-fi/horror.… Expand

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

10

ricouda59Mar 14, 2018

awesoooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmme

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

ViniciusBritoMar 13, 2018

When, possibly, a meteor falls on Earth and hit a lighthouse in an isolated location creating a bubble called "The shimmer" that anything that cross it, never comes back. The mysterious bubble keep expanding and taking more land with anyoneWhen, possibly, a meteor falls on Earth and hit a lighthouse in an isolated location creating a bubble called "The shimmer" that anything that cross it, never comes back. The mysterious bubble keep expanding and taking more land with anyone apart of what is going on. During one expedition, one person returns for the firs time, Kane(Soldier), Husband of Lena (Biologist, ex military), he comes different and she wants to understand what happend inside the dome.
This movie is by essence sci-fi but have a bunch of elements from horror and thriller that worked highly, using many open plans for you to get tense that something could come out from here or there technically this movie is phenomenal. I loved the cinematography that they presented, a bunch of moments they show the image obfuscated, with some blur, refracted.. Giving signs of what actually hapens in the shimmer, they show hands touching themselves on the other side of a glass of water, things that will echo later on. The scenario are just phenomenal, the way that they put the forest was simply amazing, how it was dominating the hole place and creating things, making something evolved.. this part really reminded me of the last of us, some scenes and places of the movie, the hole scenario, it gave me flashes from the game.
I like how the movie could be a metaphor for somethings, like for us, that couldn't let the natives dress what they wanted and put on them what we dressed, can't make it to a new place and let it how it is, not just refering to people, but to nature itself, modifying stuff. To a cancer, where want to face it, other fight(showing that you end up becoming what you fight against) or neither of those, leading that the cancer are oursleves. This movie is much about self-destruction, like a cancer, when everybody is blaming themselves or did something that literally destroyed them, is getting themselves destructed.
The track of the movie also are great, having somethings that complete the scene, sometimes with something supernatural, exemplifying in sound what is going on, sometimes a calm and peaceful that complete the beautiful environment, wich remembered me a lot of the last of us as well. Some moments of panic and scary being well represented by the song as well, helping to let you tense.
All the acting worked here, Natalie Portman can express herself with eyes and mouth, passing an idea of doubt and at the same time without expression, having a pretty good chemistry with Oscar Isaac, that also have a good job with his character, passing the idea of hapiness and later frustration. Gina Rodriguez did a very good job on two different moments of her character. Tessa Thompson as always delivered a much different character as usual, doing a much different interpretation, she is one of my favorite actress right now, her character is the most sweet from all of them and she phrase with calm and wisdom, just how her character is needed. Tuva Novotny did a character that was afraid, but could stand firm. Jennifer Jason Leigh did a hell of a great job, doing expression less character, cold that you can literally feel in her way of talk, in her eyes and mouth that doesn't have anything to lost, are all the way in for whatever she is up to.
The montage of the film, maybe could have be done a little better, some scenes are throw on us that just gonna make sense later on, wich is not bad, but how it is mounted i'm not so sure. The director choose to separate the acts for all of us, pointing the titles of each one.
It's a very pessimistic movie, expressing by metaphors how we are, how we are destroying ourselves and other ones. That all of us in some moment of our lives we ruined life, it's part of human nature destroy to construct or just destroy around you. Philosophical and social criticism, how we rational and evolved can destroy ourselves if we know that it ain't gonna do any good it is a genetic failure in all of us. A movie that will make people discuss and talk about it, keeping people's heads for a long time, wich is great, causing discussions and differently interpretations. Discussing creation, evolution, science, religion and, for sure, humanity.
The movie reminded me of a Fight Club quote: "Maybe self-improvement isn't the answer, maybe self-destruction is the answer."… Expand

11 of 17 users found this helpful116

All this user's reviews

10

AndresAlfonsoMar 14, 2018

I love this movie , it takes it time , but once arrives goes directly to you , some scenes are one of the most iconic of scy fy in years .

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

im_so_metaMar 13, 2018

It's a slower, deeper, more ambiguous film than, for instance, a comic book movie. If this is your cup of tea though, then its brillliant. The visuals are stunning and the narrative was interesting on my first watch, but actually afterIt's a slower, deeper, more ambiguous film than, for instance, a comic book movie. If this is your cup of tea though, then its brillliant. The visuals are stunning and the narrative was interesting on my first watch, but actually after thinking about it, watching a few YouTube analyses (e.g. the AtZ Show) and interviews with the director (Alex Garland), I re-watched it and got so much more out of it; understanding more of the concepts… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

6

whoischarlotteMar 13, 2018

Overall, I thought this was poor, after seeing 5 star reviews of a 'science fiction masterpiece' I expected big things from this film with what seemed to be a solid cast and good direction. But the film was a total headache.

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

5

bkristmanMar 13, 2018

A film that tries to make you think you should like it more than you do just because it's 'artsy'.
Wooden,comatose uninspired acting and dialogue .
Starts getting interesting at the end but by then it's too little too late.

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

10

FyilMar 13, 2018

People are too much used to have everything chew up in details to them. Annihilation is a great science fiction that requires you to think and interpret what is going on, is not thet complicated.

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

4

amheretojudgeMar 13, 2018

did it communicate with you..

Annihilation The far fetched idea is not only visible miles away before its station but even the priorities seem to fade off quite early before the scrutiny even begins. A smart adaptation with strict editingdid it communicate with you..

Annihilation

The far fetched idea is not only visible miles away before its station but even the priorities seem to fade off quite early before the scrutiny even begins. A smart adaptation with strict editing on writing section by Alex Garland is possibly the only reason why someone might survive this feature. But unfortunately as much as to-the-point and gripping the screenplay is, the execution lacks better editing as it chews on this slow pill for almost an extra half an hour (the runtime could have easily been of 90 minutes). Natalie Portman is devastatingly good and there is no flinching on that and on her supporting side Oscar Issac justifies its presence on the screen. Even though the genre depicts horror; which is on a head-scratching level (the "help me" cries will be enough for your nightmares) where even the elders might cringe on the seat, there are some genuinely good visuals that brightens the tone a bit. Annihilation is without a doubt no short on execution (Alex Garland hits perfect mark on executing the paper on screen) then whether it is to project a heart breaking action sequences or horror chills or even creative creatures but what it fails is on offering a newer perspective, better plotline and a good old tale.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

Voodoo123Mar 13, 2018

+Thought provoking sci-fi plot
+Great cast
+Excellent visual style -Pacing feels a little off I really enjoyed watching annihilation, couldn't help but feel this could've pushed to a 9 or 10/10 movie if the acting was a little tighter with+Thought provoking sci-fi plot
+Great cast
+Excellent visual style
-Pacing feels a little off

I really enjoyed watching annihilation, couldn't help but feel this could've pushed to a 9 or 10/10 movie if the acting was a little tighter with another director... Saying that it totally works and if your'e a sci-fi fan you owe it to yourself to check this gem!… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

3

shoulderoforionMar 13, 2018

This gets a big no go from me, guys. This is SciFi 101 blown up into trying to be something it isn't, this isn't transcendent or even close to the same level as Ex Machina, this a boring Invasion Of The Body Snatchers rehash

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

9

temptershellMar 12, 2018

This spectacle is not for everyone and I have to make it clear. This film is a very oneiric, story that does not fully give any answer, and the attempt to translate the novel was, in my opinion, an unrealizable project - and it was doneThis spectacle is not for everyone and I have to make it clear. This film is a very oneiric, story that does not fully give any answer, and the attempt to translate the novel was, in my opinion, an unrealizable project - and it was done great. Beautiful pictures, wonderful music and a plot that gives a lot to think about, even opening the mind.… Expand

10 of 13 users found this helpful103

All this user's reviews

8

mdbackesMar 12, 2018

Genuinely intelligent and thoughtful science fiction film that confirms Alex Garland's subtlety as a writer/director, especially after his recent Ex Machina. Veers into Alien/Thing body horror with somewhat mixed results, but stays smart.Genuinely intelligent and thoughtful science fiction film that confirms Alex Garland's subtlety as a writer/director, especially after his recent Ex Machina. Veers into Alien/Thing body horror with somewhat mixed results, but stays smart. Like most of these films, there are a few characters that just seem compelled to make obviously dumb decisions. Hope the studio commissions the rest of the trilogy's adaptation.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

8

Geng1sMar 12, 2018

Director has done a great job of taking the themes from the booking and rolling them into a movie that honestly is a lot easier to follow then the books were.

Felt like there were probably some points that needed further explanation butDirector has done a great job of taking the themes from the booking and rolling them into a movie that honestly is a lot easier to follow then the books were.

Felt like there were probably some points that needed further explanation but overall it was a great experience.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

5

ProfPandemoniumMar 12, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The poor man's version of Arrival with a heavy dose of Hollywood Feminism. A women with an expertise in cell multiplication is enlisted to save her sick husbands life. Upon arrival she and 4 other women are sent into a near suicidal mission to find the underlying cause of an alien invasion on earth. So many holes in the underlying plot including a moment where the party realizes that going to the coast is the easiest way to the lighthouse where the hive of the alien species exists. Which bodes the question why didn't they just start at the coast in the first place?

To many holes in this poor boy.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

2

SexyMangoMar 12, 2018

To everyone saying the movie is deep. I’m glad you liked it. It felt to me like someone got really impressed by DMT and failed to recreate his experience.

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

6

ishadowMar 12, 2018

If you're even remotely interested, watch it on Netflix.
It's a weird movie, pretty much average in everything.
There's no highlights really, but bad moments aren't too often or important. It could better, it could have more logical plot, butIf you're even remotely interested, watch it on Netflix.
It's a weird movie, pretty much average in everything.
There's no highlights really, but bad moments aren't too often or important.
It could better, it could have more logical plot, but it doesn't matter in the end. It's a simple movie, with simple plot, and a lot of overused themes. You watch in anticipation for a big twist or something innovating, but you won't get it.

Pretty much very similar quality to Prometheus or Alien: Covenant. A bit more artistic, but same in the end.

I would regret going to cinema, but it's OK for a Netflix movie, especially with good HDR.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

4

NBNEMar 12, 2018

Great premise, falls short. Plot just kind of unravels and doesn't hold together. As mediocre as this is - TONS BETTER THAN BLACK PANTHER!

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

4

ScienceAdvisorMar 12, 2018

All FX flash, and little substance, wrapped around intellectual ideas that do not adequately tie together. Though the writer/director is hoping you cannot figure that out. It really starts to break down about half-way through when convienceAll FX flash, and little substance, wrapped around intellectual ideas that do not adequately tie together. Though the writer/director is hoping you cannot figure that out. It really starts to break down about half-way through when convience replaces continuity, especially with the environment of the anomaly. This continues the Netflix run of quantity over quality, unfortunately.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

5

muldjordMar 12, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie should be called Assimilation, not Annilihation. There's absolutely no annihilation going on.
You'll hear the phrase "I don't know" a lot. Which is seemingly also what the script writers said whenever they asked themselves the question "So, then what happens?".
It's a tedious mess that has no idea what it is or what it's trying to achieve. Ultimately it ends with a whimper leaving basically no questions answered. But then again, I never figured out what the questions were to begin with.

Ugh... Waste of time. Ex Machina was amazing! This movie is just weirdness for weirdness' sake.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

FranbarrmanMar 12, 2018

This film is a mindblowing sci-fi beautifull thing, since it starts you know youre watching something different something unique, natalie is at her very best so are the rest of the crew oscar and jennifer, the sets are amazing, theThis film is a mindblowing sci-fi beautifull thing, since it starts you know youre watching something different something unique, natalie is at her very best so are the rest of the crew oscar and jennifer, the sets are amazing, the cinematography is so colorfull and beautifull and god that endind is a big wow. This one will stick with me for a long time. The only issue are some cgi scenes that looked a bit off but youll forgett this. With only two films Alex Garland is one of muy top ten directors what he has achived with this movie and ExMachina is something i cant describe.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

10

CTHReviewsMar 12, 2018

Annihilation is a horror movie in disguise, and one of the creepiest ones I've seen in a while.

The best part of this movie are its concepts. Now, hear me out on this, the execution is done brilliantly, but the ideas and concepts for some ofAnnihilation is a horror movie in disguise, and one of the creepiest ones I've seen in a while.

The best part of this movie are its concepts. Now, hear me out on this, the execution is done brilliantly, but the ideas and concepts for some of the creatures and phenomenons are brilliantly well thought-out, especially when you see this bear-like creature. It honestly scared the sh*t out of me.

It's such a bizarre film with a fantastic mythos behind it.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

8

The4thBillboardMar 11, 2018

Movie was better than I was expecting. Based on the trailer I thought it would be a little more like a horror movie but this is a good solid SciFi.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

0

jimulkaMar 11, 2018

A big fat -0- for this mess of a movie. SEE 'Critic Reviews', Rex Reed's (New York Observer) review. That is precisely my review.

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

0

jimhillmeyerMar 11, 2018

Terrible movie. Incoherent jumble of absurd, weakly-related incidents trying to hinge on a totally murky attempt at a plotline. Had the feeling a Hollywood techie was fascinated with some 4th of July-like special effects equipment, and theTerrible movie. Incoherent jumble of absurd, weakly-related incidents trying to hinge on a totally murky attempt at a plotline. Had the feeling a Hollywood techie was fascinated with some 4th of July-like special effects equipment, and the writer, director, producers tried to construct a story around the CGI's. The 'ME TOO' group must have like it, because the military-style incursion into the film's Never-Neverland was replicated right from the standard male, testosterone format. Sorry, ladies, it might conceivably work somewhere, sometime, somehow, but not here. Final word: a psychedelic conglomeration of movie trash.… Expand

7 of 18 users found this helpful711

All this user's reviews

3

BooyahMediaMar 10, 2018

Confusing storyline and plot but amazing visual and audio effects, so vivid, bright and beautiful. but absolutely no direction with the first 30 minutes a total waste.

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

9

NeutralMilkHMar 9, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. If you have a problem with some some of the acting and the (initially) mediocre... that's fine, it threw me off too the first time I watched it. However, the second time I watched it with all of my information gathered, a lot of things clicked for me, such as why a certain character says the line, "It's a trick of the light!"

Summary before spoilers: The story's actually good in my opinion, characters are developed (if somewhat underacted and underwritten at points), the visuals are **** amazing, and it actually made me sit and watch the credits for a few minutes... I know it says its underacted and underwritten, but that's only in retrospect after my initial viewing which put me on the edge of my seat. So yeah, it's "almost" a 9/10. Best movie I've seen so far this year, there will probably be a bunch of better ones that come out, but yeah, for now, I love this one.

Also, as a response to Gloukas ridiculous belief that this is the worst movie ever made on a big-budget scale, I've written down a list of a bunch of movies that everyone will agree is worse than this one. -Transformers Franchise
-Beowulf (2007)... it's obscure now for a reason
-Pixels
-Jupiter Ascending
-R.I.P.D.
-The Last Airbender
-Batman and Robin
-Disaster Movie
-The Fifty Shades Franchise
-Charlie's Angels

In terms of Science fiction
-Battlefield Earth
-Jurassic Park 3
-Planet of the Apes (2001, the original is a classic)
-Terminator 5 (which is honestly more confusing that Annihilation since they just stopped giving a **** about the timelines.)

--At this point, I delve into much deeper "spoilers," so if you clicked on this knowing that it contained them, and you actually want to watch the movie, then you should probably turn back from this point.--

My theory, is that this movie is about cancer, or relates to cancer in some way. It's about how cancer effects and changes certain people, especially the scientists, who might all be getting killed by "cancer" except for Natalie Portman... essentially, the ending with the plasma grenade might be chemotherapy, and the reason as to why the shimmer is in her eye and as to why Oscar Isaac is so weird is a sign that the cancer might be coming back... this just so happens to be a movie about cancer that pretends to be one about the unknown (which is revealed to be aliens). Anyway, this is just my theory, and it probably sucks ass, if you want to take this movie literally, the ending could just be that the "fake" Natalie Portman came up with a convincing story (albeit, with a bunch of "I don't knows," and also, she would have to know information about the other characters) or that the "real" Natalie Portman simply came back with a trace from the shimmer.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

8

jackmorMar 9, 2018

It was strange but very entertaining. I would watch it again of TV just to see what I might have missed.

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

9

ohnomrbillMar 8, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. i enjoyed this movie as a metaphor. its about communication and not meeting our humanity in this missed communication. the country is divided into factions, like congress and we never seem to meet as one. this is how i enjoys this movie. yet, as sci fi, at a point near the end, there is an explosion of light which is really cool. at first i was struggling to like it above the horror i was seeing. in the end was an unusual resolve. for me, this was the movie of the year and kind of better than the shape of water which had originality yet the same story as always. this movie was a little different and a little more original.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

6

TrevorsViewMar 8, 2018

As it starts, Lena, a biologist, sits in a glassy room, questioned by a scientist in protection equipment who stands over her. She says she has no recollection on whatever just happened, compelling the viewer to remember events as she does.As it starts, Lena, a biologist, sits in a glassy room, questioned by a scientist in protection equipment who stands over her. She says she has no recollection on whatever just happened, compelling the viewer to remember events as she does. After photos in Lena’s sepia-tinted home illustrate her husband’s army life, he returns, devoid of previous recollection himself as to how he returned. Outside her own awareness, a comet strikes a lighthouse, warps its sense of shape or texture, then sets off an expanding rainbow bubble, its shimmery wall set to mutate cell reproduction.

Paralleling scene number one, Lena questioning her husband’s activity in war reverses her interrogation; she stands over him slumped in his seat. Once seated across each other at the table, held hands reflected backwards behind a water glass, his blood appears in said glass, the first sign of his multiple organ failure. Any focus on their eyes throughout this crisis implements whenever they witness obliteration, up until the last frame addresses all you need to know and all you wish to know.

I love underseen independent films like Annihilation, those following nontraditional narrative conventions to take creative liberties in discussing the inner human condition. Alex Garland already perfectly accomplished his breakout art-house feature Ex Machina, so now he brings out another visual delight in his second project, thus far the only movie of 2018 I’ve anticipated the release of!

Garland conveys his actors’ own bent genes, each performance almost appearing alien in a series unevenly blank appearances. Of the talented cast members, Oscar Isaac (Ex Machina, Inside Llewyn Davis) happily sells it best as Lena’s husband. His illness deflects his voice to transparently reveal the sad lack of identity in his eyes: a slow, troubled, very real war veteran. It’s easy to see why Garland works well off Mr. Isaac!

Besides Garland’s attentive direction, the work by production designer Mark Digby (Ex Machina, Slumdog Millionaire) symbolically suggests a DNA strand’s deconstruction and reconstruction. You always seem boxed inside a different world larger than life in the Shimmer’s chaotic colors chosen to suggest self-destruction in a stark contrast against Lena’s boxy interrogation room. Inside the void grows beautiful yet strange flowers living together on a single branch, despite being of diverse species, alongside some technicolor moss and man-shaped bushes. These outlandish mutations hold beauty, although plenty of gruesome, supernatural appearances never shy away from any bodily imagery in its graphic detail that catches you off guard.

But honestly, Alex Garland has got room for improvement, particularly in helping the typical viewer care about the story. The on-the-nose dialogue said by such cold characters also tosses out more expositional information than the average viewer could handle, especially in the first act, all writing the names in the script out to model figures of altered chromosomes rather than well-fleshed out people.

This excess of information attempts to counteract the lack of sincere emotion with a cliché catalyst of Lena’s husband leaving her alone, a plot device done rather weakly compared to other similar scripts. Further validating the cliché, Lena cheats on her husband, in turn making her less sympathetic—would you root for some unfaithful whore? I sure wouldn’t! Especially since Lena expresses few tangible opinions about her team of four other women in their mission through the Shimmer, older viewers might not embrace something as absurd as this journey into the unknown.

However, Annihilation still meets the expectations of art cinema lovers in Alex Garland’s near-horror approach. In each disorienting time narrative beneath the Shimmer, suspense eliminates clear signs of what happens next. Soon, after several attacks by a creature shrouded in darkness, a horrific faceless bear’s roar mixed with a woman’s screams leaves both everything and nothing to the imagination. These are not the types of images you’re able to forget easily, regardless of whether you want it to.

With these brave woman leaders who willingly face up to such horrors previously unimagined, they warn us all, of our eventual end as we watch their individual paths to insanity inside the Shimmer. Likewise, this alternate future’s continental board steers clear of personal demolition, suggesting that the damaged male leaders in the United States wrongly believe women are the true unidentifiable Extra-Terrestrials in the foreign land that is masculine privilege. Considering Hollywood’s confused gender equality nonsense, it deserves some compliments when a motion picture like this one empowers women without devaluing men; they remind us that if equal treatment to both sides is achieved, we have no need to fear an annihilation.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

2

JudMar 8, 2018

It never ceases to amaze me how film critics are attracted to vapid and tedious films like this one, almost like their careers depend on them, but in self-abusive way. Lame from beginning to end, it attempts to liven things up by dabbling inIt never ceases to amaze me how film critics are attracted to vapid and tedious films like this one, almost like their careers depend on them, but in self-abusive way. Lame from beginning to end, it attempts to liven things up by dabbling in many genres: Horror, Action, Sci-Fi, Suspense, Fantasy, Thriller, Romance, Soap Opera and even Unintended Humor but fails at every attempt.
A cautionary note: if our Defense Department ever attempts to treat annihilation events like this one was, we are in deep trouble.… Expand

8 of 17 users found this helpful89

All this user's reviews

0

gloukasMar 7, 2018

ok. i will keep it simple. i love complex, confusing movies. loved the directors other movie. this movie however, is probably the worst movie i have ever seen in my entire life. i am not sure where or how any decent ratings are coming from.ok. i will keep it simple. i love complex, confusing movies. loved the directors other movie. this movie however, is probably the worst movie i have ever seen in my entire life. i am not sure where or how any decent ratings are coming from. everyone in the theater also was baffled, confused, laughing at the film (not the funny parts) and disoriented. the film had no purpose, an resolved nothing. it was complete garbage and the ending was so predictable. again, i repeat. this is by far, the worst movie i have ever seen. i cannot think of another movie that was worse than this. i think people feel they "have" to like it, or that it is more complex than it is. to not like it would mean they are stupid. but don't be tricked or lie to yourself. this is the worst movie ever made (on a hollywood/higher budget scale)

terrible and without purpose or resolution..… Expand

8 of 22 users found this helpful814

All this user's reviews

8

WintxMar 7, 2018

Scifi geek here. Still obsessing over this film. Missing many of the novel's scenes/narrative, yet does embrace the essence. Yes, it could be tweaked (would like even longer 2nd act!). But Jesus, not to hyperbolize too much -- I felt asScifi geek here. Still obsessing over this film. Missing many of the novel's scenes/narrative, yet does embrace the essence. Yes, it could be tweaked (would like even longer 2nd act!). But Jesus, not to hyperbolize too much -- I felt as confused & enlightened as much as I did watching Kubrick's 2001. Although I hear it has director's blessing - hoping for an extended "director's cut" in the future. You may hate it now, but give it 10 years... and don't sit near any popcorn eaters!… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

9

Grueny7Mar 6, 2018

This film cannot be summed up or described in a short review. It exists somewhere between an indie horror film and a psychological art project. Clearly made by a director way smarter than myself, I could not begin to understand the nuancesThis film cannot be summed up or described in a short review. It exists somewhere between an indie horror film and a psychological art project. Clearly made by a director way smarter than myself, I could not begin to understand the nuances and meaning behind the gorgeous imagery, nor do I need to in order to appreciate its beauty. The visuals are remarkably stunning for not being a big budgeted blockbuster and the performances are subtly strong. Recommended for the hardcore fans of sci-fi and Indie Cinema rather than those seeking an accessible horror/fantasy experience.… Expand

7 of 17 users found this helpful710

All this user's reviews

10

TheRedSnifit1Mar 6, 2018

A surreal, trippy movie following as they enter a region where reality isn't what it used to be. Visually stunning and well-written. Only downside is that there was maybe a touch too much time spent on flashbacks, especially at theA surreal, trippy movie following as they enter a region where reality isn't what it used to be. Visually stunning and well-written. Only downside is that there was maybe a touch too much time spent on flashbacks, especially at the beginning.

This is one of the best, if not *the* best, "Lovecraftian" (an overused term but it fits this movie well) film out there.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

8

CarFan1999Mar 6, 2018

It's an interesting sci-fi film that has a lot of beautiful and sometimes horrifying imagery. More of a slower moving, high-concept sci-fi rather than a strait-up thriller. It's worth seeing.

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

TryASummersaultMar 5, 2018

3.1/5 Quite underwhelming other than the visuals honestly, and the epitome of style over substance. Plotting was quite nonsensical and directionless.Some very hollow acting other than Portman and some extremly unnecessary sex flashbacks3.1/5 Quite underwhelming other than the visuals honestly, and the epitome of style over substance. Plotting was quite nonsensical and directionless.Some very hollow acting other than Portman and some extremly unnecessary sex flashbacks injected into the film for nothing but shock value. Tried to be way deeper than it was. The only truly exciting scene was in the house with the mutated bear. Both this film and ex machina had extremely misleading trailers making the appear to be sci/fi horror’s and they were drawn out sci fi dramas that lacked anything remotely worthy of being hailed masterpieces. The whole supposed deeper message and symbolization interpretation that so many of these self proclaimed internet geniuses seem to have is quite funny and pretentious. This was a scattered mess with some really interests visuals which at times had some mediocre cgi.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

3

preciouskikiMar 5, 2018

I must admit, sci-fi is not my thing, so if you are a sci-fi fan, you might enjoy this. As for me, I kept checking my watch. It felt long to me, with stilted dialogue and two many pauses in an already long movie. And I was put off by NatalieI must admit, sci-fi is not my thing, so if you are a sci-fi fan, you might enjoy this. As for me, I kept checking my watch. It felt long to me, with stilted dialogue and two many pauses in an already long movie. And I was put off by Natalie Portman still doing that breathy Jacqueline Kennedy/Marilyn Monroe voice. Although I am a woman and love seeing women get their fair share of action movie roles, I have to say: Why would the expedition team not include any males? In the three rows in front of me, I saw several people fiddling with their cellphones dozens of times, like practically nonstop. Maybe they were bored, too.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

10

KalleeMar 5, 2018

Wow. I am in awe of this movie. If you want your brain to get scrambled, to have your view of life as you know it expanded, then this is the movie for you. I highly recommend watching it in the theaters, as it is one of those movies that isWow. I am in awe of this movie. If you want your brain to get scrambled, to have your view of life as you know it expanded, then this is the movie for you. I highly recommend watching it in the theaters, as it is one of those movies that is larger than life.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

7

KannibalMar 4, 2018

Annihilation is a solid film, it features some stunning high-points and drags during a few fallow periods all in all I wanted more from the movie but I enjoyed it. Annihilation will occupies space in you head for a while, in spite of its flaws.

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

9

BrianMcCriticMar 4, 2018

These are the types of films that really captivate the imagination. Annihilation still has me thinking about it a week later and I don't even come close to having all the answers. A

7 of 14 users found this helpful77

All this user's reviews

9

JPKMar 3, 2018

Chilling And Mysterious
This Film Is Suspenseful And Intense From Start To Finish.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

7

dangerfarMar 3, 2018

Annihilation is a captivating and slow burning fantasy/sci-fi that manages to overcome its narrative hollowness through a very strong audio-visual presentation, which especially in the last fifth of the film offers a uniquely rivetingAnnihilation is a captivating and slow burning fantasy/sci-fi that manages to overcome its narrative hollowness through a very strong audio-visual presentation, which especially in the last fifth of the film offers a uniquely riveting experience. The first 4/5 of the movie are, though intriguing, fairly ho-hum. Perfectly watchable as the suspense and mystery are well orchestrated, however many of the characterizations, scares, tension, and plot directions are heavily borrowed and often non-sensical from any viewpoint tied to the real world (hence more in the fantasy realm). It leans a bit heavily on flashbacks that don't hold much meaning, save for one which tries to explain a central theme in the story but gets the biology mostly wrong (or if being charitable vastly oversimplified), thus somewhat souring the note. The characters can at times be frustrating as well, taking predictably rash and irrational directions plucked from generic horror or thriller movies that have been recycled over and over. The last 1/5 is what really saved the movie for me though. It doesn't offer a particularly satisfying resolution or anything, indeed if I'm being honest the core plot itself even when brought to bare really is mostly derivative nonsense that merely pretends to offer insight and answers by vaguely making suggestions about dubious things like "refracting DNA" to move things along in a traditional sense. However the audio-visual presentation of the climax is absolutely arresting, and so well done so as to give one an a small taste of a psychedelic experience, a chance to with the right eyes peer into the nature of creation and the self in a way that is difficult to do without the right stiumulation. It drew me in completely during this sequence, so much so that immediately after it returned to normalcy I wanted to go back. It's a rare and precious thing in movies these days, and it was worth the cost of admission alone. Sound editing and design, cinematography and visual presentation, and acting by the ever charismatic and engaging Portman are all top notch. The rest is well executed but fairly forgettable and uninteresting. It is a rare experience that managed to leave me with a positive impression even as it mostly failed to deliver anything meaningful narratively. I will certainly return to those final minutes again on the smaller screen and marvel at their wonder.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

10

23GMar 3, 2018

A transcendent masterpiece. It is a movie that asks you to keep pace and fill in the blanks, so if you are looking for cheap sci-fi/horror thrills, look else-where. Be ready to give yourself completely to this vision, and the result isA transcendent masterpiece. It is a movie that asks you to keep pace and fill in the blanks, so if you are looking for cheap sci-fi/horror thrills, look else-where. Be ready to give yourself completely to this vision, and the result is something that you will not soon forget. Haven't stopped thinking and talking about it since I left the theater...… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

jldude84Mar 2, 2018

First of all, don't mind the negative Nancy haters bashing this movie. If you enjoy legit sci fi movies, you will not regret watching this. I happen to love creepfest sci fis, and this covers all the bases. It's not even meant to be "scary",First of all, don't mind the negative Nancy haters bashing this movie. If you enjoy legit sci fi movies, you will not regret watching this. I happen to love creepfest sci fis, and this covers all the bases. It's not even meant to be "scary", which is really unique and it's NOT the typical "aliens are coming to annihilate us" as the title suggests. But at the same time, it has one or two LEGIT creepy scenes. Most of all the mutated bear(no spoiler). I couldn't help but be amazed at just how creative this movie is. I can't remember the last time I saw such amazing creativity and imagination.

ONLY thing I didn't care for was the tempo of the film was a bit slow, but I guess that's ok since it's all meant to tell the story.

I would definitely recommend this if you like unique sci fi movies instead of the stupid Cloverfield crap.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

9

Davrosdaleks1Mar 2, 2018

I was really surprised by Annihilation. It's a sci-fi/horror/thriller. It's equally weird, intriguing, and unsettling. Basically, what Prometheus should have been.

One of the most visually unique films I've seen. There is so much memorableI was really surprised by Annihilation. It's a sci-fi/horror/thriller. It's equally weird, intriguing, and unsettling. Basically, what Prometheus should have been.

One of the most visually unique films I've seen. There is so much memorable imagery, beautiful, creepy, and sometimes both at once. The whole film has a unique style that I dig. The lightning has a sunsetsey 70's feel to it. Rather than a traditional score, a good portion of the music goes for a folksy style, which actually meshes very well with the swampland the characters are trekking through.

I've heard complaints that the film is too slow. Personally, it went fine with me. I don't think there were any scenes they could've cut. However, some of the dialogue does slow things down sometimes. It's very deliberate and intellectual -ish and doesn't always sound natural. Though this mostly occurs in the opening chapter where all the exposition comes from. (Jennifer Jason Leigh's character is especially a bit of a boring chore to get through in beginning. Can't tell if it's the dialogue, her acting, or a bit of both.)… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

9

FlexedacornMar 2, 2018

As soon as I saw this movie was being adapted by Alex Garland, I knew it was a must see for me. I loved the slow burn and unique feeling of Ex Machina and was hoping for a similar feel. In anticipation for the movie I picked up the firstAs soon as I saw this movie was being adapted by Alex Garland, I knew it was a must see for me. I loved the slow burn and unique feeling of Ex Machina and was hoping for a similar feel. In anticipation for the movie I picked up the first book of the Southern Reach trilogy to read beforehand. Let me just say, I loved the movie and the book for two different reasons. Both book and film adaptation had amazing visuals that are a must read and/or see. I felt the movie was more action oriented whereas the book was a very ambiguous slow burn thriller. I wouldn’t say the movie was a faithful adaptation, but I found Alex Garlands take on the story to be easier to digest then its source material. There is a particular seen at the end of the movie that will probably go down as one of the top sci-fi scenes of all time. If you are looking for an interesting original sci fi movie, this is your film. Be forewarned if you read the book(s), this movie has a lot of creative differences… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryMar 2, 2018

Natalie Portman takes her whack at a sci-fi story, playing a biologist who joins a mission to penetrate the "shimmer" (one of the dumbest visual effects in recent films). She and a crew of 4 other women set out to find what's causing thisNatalie Portman takes her whack at a sci-fi story, playing a biologist who joins a mission to penetrate the "shimmer" (one of the dumbest visual effects in recent films). She and a crew of 4 other women set out to find what's causing this mysterious phenomenon, but they do so very slowly. There are some interesting visuals and one scary scene (the sloth-like monster), but most of its suspense is doled out with lots of anticipation and ominous music. Ultimately, there's a compelling creepiness that propels this puzzle forward, although at a glacial pace.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

TheBlurbMar 1, 2018

Alex Garland's adaptation of Annihilation is ambiguous at best. The film is loosely based off of Jeff VanderMeer's best selling 'Southern Reach' trilogy. The plot of the film follows the basic outline of around four experts entering theAlex Garland's adaptation of Annihilation is ambiguous at best. The film is loosely based off of Jeff VanderMeer's best selling 'Southern Reach' trilogy. The plot of the film follows the basic outline of around four experts entering the Shimmer to investigate the root cause. Natalie Portman plays the film's lead Lena, with Jennifer Jason Leigh as the psychologist, Tessa Thompson, Gina Rodriguez, and Tuva Novotny.

The film is told in the perspectives of flashbacks and real time. This makes the viewer easily lose interest in the story if it it doesn't have some sort of consistent thread running through. One of the effects of being in The Shimmer is that you develop a form of dementia. After crossing over, the team awoke with no memory of what happened but deduced through food rations they had been inside for at least three days.

This would have been a very interesting perspective of story telling, however the time jump between the flashbacks, Lena's interrogation, and time spent in the Shimmer is so large that you can never fully get invested. The best parts of the films were when they were inside The Shimmer.

The set director created a world much like that of The Last Of Us with a seemingly constant growth of fungi. It's sort of explained that the rate of evolution moves much faster in this zone and therefore animals and plants take on an other-worldly appearance. Again, just as you are beginning to really get into these moments you are ripped out by a flash back or the interrogation.

On top of this, any time you begin to get a hint of an explanation as to what is going on you are pulled to a totally different scene. It get's more frustrating as the movie goes on because things just stop making sense. This makes it sound like one of those movies that you have to be an intellectual to understand, but it just doesn't make sense. It's almost like Alex Garland took the main parts of the book he liked and then tried to put them together with not much in between.

If you want to make an intriguing sci-fi movie, all the dots need to connect at the end. A lot of the scenes seemed either out of context or just very badly timed, moments that seemed shocking or intriguing were dropped or instantly switched gears. With all of this being said the movie isn't completely terrible.

In fact, the five characters we follow are portrayed very well by the respective actors. Each character had a slightly obscured past, after all this 'suicide mission' is volunteer, that you wanted to know more about. Unfortunately the film didn't offer much character growth for any of them, including the lead.

All things considered this probably wouldn't be your best choice for a movie date, but if you really wanna see it give it a shot. For this writer, the movie wasn't very intriguing as a whole and did many things that reminded me of other sic-fi's I would rather have watched. I understand what the director was going for but in all honesty, I don't feel it was achieved.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

10

Brent_MarchantMar 1, 2018

A mind-blowing, sophisticated sci-fi tale masterfully brought to the screen by director Alex Garland, who has upped his game considerably here, even outstripping the success of his previous work, "Ex Machina." The film's richly layered,A mind-blowing, sophisticated sci-fi tale masterfully brought to the screen by director Alex Garland, who has upped his game considerably here, even outstripping the success of his previous work, "Ex Machina." The film's richly layered, deftly nuanced, insightful script, combined with gorgeous cinematography and an inventive production design, make for riveting viewing. Note, however, that this is not a picture to be watched casually or when one is easily distracted. But an attentive screening is sure to captivate, providing much to think about in terms of metaphysics, spirituality, existence and evolution -- and possibly forever changing one's views on these heady subjects.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

10

caf2042Mar 1, 2018

Annihilation is directed by Alex Garland, and is based off of a massively successful novel by Jeff VanderMeer. This was one of my most anticipated movies of the year, and having finally seen it, I am blown away. Annihilation is incredible.Annihilation is directed by Alex Garland, and is based off of a massively successful novel by Jeff VanderMeer. This was one of my most anticipated movies of the year, and having finally seen it, I am blown away. Annihilation is incredible. Alex Garland had already knocked it out of the park with Ex Machina, and Annihilation is even better. This is full on 2001 style insanity, and it is glorious. Everything about this movie is so finely crafted and carefully constructed that the finished product is like almost nothing i’ve ever seen. The performances are all exceptional, especially from Natalie Portman. She has a lot of difficult work do, and she handles it with such a resolve. The standout in the film, is how it looks. Alex Garland has crafted a visual wonder. Then comes the end. No spoilers, but the final 20 minutes of the film are so insane, that the only thing I can compare it to is the ending of 2001. This movie also has one of the scariest scenes of the decade so far. Again no spoilers, but the way tension is created is masterful. Honestly, 2018 is gonna have to try really hard to give me a movie that is better than Annihilation.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

9

bfoore90Feb 28, 2018

This isn't a movie for everyone, it's a hugely thought provoking and terrifying in the sense that you don't know what's going on once they enter the environment.The performances are all very good and the direction and shots are all insanelyThis isn't a movie for everyone, it's a hugely thought provoking and terrifying in the sense that you don't know what's going on once they enter the environment.The performances are all very good and the direction and shots are all insanely good. It's a rare film, thats saying the least.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

9

BradHughesFeb 28, 2018

If you loved Ex Machina, you will love this. Wonderfully acted and thought provoking, it builds towards a riveting and justified climax that manages to provide both a sense of completion and moral/intellectual ambiguity. I wish there could beIf you loved Ex Machina, you will love this. Wonderfully acted and thought provoking, it builds towards a riveting and justified climax that manages to provide both a sense of completion and moral/intellectual ambiguity. I wish there could be a sequel, but despite strong action scenes in the second half of the film, it is not commercial enough for the mainstream audience.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

9

UltimatmovieguyFeb 28, 2018

From writer and director Alex Garland, Annihilation is about a team of researchers who go into this unknown zone that has appeared called ‘The Shimmer’ to investigate what it is, why it’s here, and how it’s growing and changing itsFrom writer and director Alex Garland, Annihilation is about a team of researchers who go into this unknown zone that has appeared called ‘The Shimmer’ to investigate what it is, why it’s here, and how it’s growing and changing its surroundings so rapidly. I was a fan of Garland’s last film he wrote and directed, Ex Machina, for his tightly written dialogue and mesmerizing scene development with great acting and a surprising amount of action as well. His work on that film transfers over beautifully to Annihilation with a substantially bigger budget and a wider variety of acting as well. Even though this script has substantially less dialogue than his last film, each and every line is executed beautifully and the audience feels the impact of every one as well. His direction in this movie is flawless with the proper use of slow motion and the mix of special effects and practical makes it mesmerizing every second the cast is in the shimmer. Like I said the dialogue is practically flawless with it’s variety of characters and unique builds in this film. The twists written come across very well and are fleshed out beautifully with its amazing cast and great direction. Rob Hardy’s work on cinematography is amazing with his offsetting shots and beautifully crafted scenes. With him working on Ex Machina with Garland they have now developed a system that is just pumping out more and more beautiful movies every few years now. Acting wise everyone did a flawless job in this film. Natalie Portman I believe has never done a bad or even a decent performance, when she hits the screen she’s impeccable with every role, every character, every scene, every line of dialogue that she executes in every film she’s in. Jennifer Jason Leigh did an amazing job once again as Dr. Ventress in this film, I grew a very big liking for her from her performance in The Hateful Eight. Even Gina Rodriguez and Tessa Thompson did amazing jobs for their polar-opposite characters in this film. One of the biggest parts of this film is the make p done on the cast and it’s by far the best looking makeup of the year. The scars on characters and tattoos being strategically placed on the characters makes this films story just more and more impactful with every watch. The blood and gore used is beautiful combined with great prosthetics and for gore and creatures as well. Annihilation I believe will be one of the best sleeper movies of the year with it’s highly original sci-fi story and great direction and acting with a flawless blend of CGI and practical effects used. My only complaint has to be a subplot that attempts to flesh out Portman's character a bit more, I felt it’s not necessary and drags the runtime out a little bit too long. Minus that it’s a near perfect sci-fi movie. I have to give this film a 9.25/10… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

8

mace8704Feb 28, 2018

Based on the trailer, I was expecting a very different movie than what I got. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but let's be very clear here. This is an abstract, cerebral, sci-fi film that offers very few concrete answers. To understandBased on the trailer, I was expecting a very different movie than what I got. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but let's be very clear here. This is an abstract, cerebral, sci-fi film that offers very few concrete answers. To understand the film with any degree of depth, I had to go online, and read fan interpretations and explanations and the directors commentary. This film is not self contained, and is highly open to personal interpretation, which some audience members will inevitably find frustrating. I'd recommended going to see in theaters if you're looking for an abstract and contemplative film about human nature. I'd avoid if you're looking for a film that is light, fun, or scary.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

9

IamTrinaFeb 28, 2018

Pros: Interesting. Different. "Cool." Some pretty scary intense scenes/creatures and weird sounds. Great special effects. Good acting. Memorable. Cons: A little slow at times, but that should be expected for the plot. Got better (faster andPros: Interesting. Different. "Cool." Some pretty scary intense scenes/creatures and weird sounds. Great special effects. Good acting. Memorable. Cons: A little slow at times, but that should be expected for the plot. Got better (faster and more action/drama) in the middle to end of movie. Could have more sound in these slow places. Only a couple things not explained. Maybe these things are in the book. Neither pro nor con: a few gory and bloody scenes (well done)
All in all the mesmerizing parts will stay with me. I would have given it an 8.5, so I rounded up to a 9.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

10

shuruppakFeb 28, 2018

This film is more challenging than typical sci-fi, superhero offerings -- but well worth it. I'm sure it will be divisive, but for those who prefer cerebral films that don't provide ready-made or easy interpretation, 'Annihilation' will be aThis film is more challenging than typical sci-fi, superhero offerings -- but well worth it. I'm sure it will be divisive, but for those who prefer cerebral films that don't provide ready-made or easy interpretation, 'Annihilation' will be a treat. Gorgeous visuals and great musical/sound track. Doesn't follow the book that closely, but I liked the choices that were made in the screenplay. Well cast. Prefer to see in theater over small-screen.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

10

AGeekNamedBobFeb 28, 2018

Edited from my blog review. ANNIHILATION is a divisive film. There are many who, once they realize the film isn’t exactly the alien action romp promised from the trailers, will check out early and not allow themselves to be on an originalEdited from my blog review. ANNIHILATION is a divisive film. There are many who, once they realize the film isn’t exactly the alien action romp promised from the trailers, will check out early and not allow themselves to be on an original and thought-provoking journey. There are others who will get on this train, allowing the curiouser and curiouser ideas to start to sink in; but many of them will get off - or be stuck aboard unwillingly- as ANNIHILATION’s train throttled full steam ahead in a pile of weird akin to 2001 taking a ride on Willy Wonka’s Boat Tunnel Hellscape. Or if like me, will station themselves in the Engine car tossing every ounce of coal into the fire screaming MORE MORE MORE.

A careening train isn’t perhaps the best metaphor. ANNIHILATION is a slow burn, much like the novel by Jeff Vandermeer. The first of the three “Southern Reach” books is deeply unsettling, imbued with an unquiet dread as we follow The Biologist and her three teammates sent to explore the aforementioned Area X - an area where biology and evolution has gone haywire. And where-from no one returns the same. I loved it, and immediately ran out to buy the other two books - but felt the story of how Area X alters and maddens the women wouldn’t be very filmmable. Writer-director Alex Garland apparently thought so to. The film for ANNIHILATION is rather different than the source; keeping the very basics but changing just about everything else. But that’s fine. He carries over the tone perfectly, and taking the internal novel and making it visual. It is remarkable; feeling like the previous version but still being entirely it’s own thing.

This matches with the world of Area X. Inside The Shimmer, the film’s name for the purple glow creating the barrier (an example of visual changes in that the book version is invisible), evolution has gone haywire. Mutations of plants and animals live in this new ecosystem. Some gorgeous and harmless; some bone-chillingly terrifying. I don’t write about specifics in my reviews, but there is one sequence was so far the scariest of the year, perhaps of the last several. The sounds. THAT sound. Thus, reconfiguring of the book into the feature fits. Garland builds a more directed narrative, continually sending the crew deeper into Area X, themselves and their madness. Before I move on, those designs are grotesque and beautiful. Is is odd to call gore beautiful? If not, the disturbing beauty of some of the dead is one of the most impressive designs I’ve seen in ages. Gorehounds like me will appreciate several sequences but the disturbing nastiness isn't the focus although it does get a rise. Garland chose well with Director of Photography Rob Hardy. Hardy creates a lush world of evolutionary change and destruction; simultaneously engaging and endangering. As I sat in the theater marveling, I could hear Garland in my ear “Things are going to get weird, I’m going to make it weird.” I thank him for it. Garland has made a career of some of the best sci-fi /horror scripts: SUNSHINE, DREDD, 28 DAYS LATER…, and his directorial debut: EX MACHINA, my favorite film of 2015. Like EX MACHINA, Garland explores many questions, but doesn’t always give solid answers. But he finds the right balance; the audience is left pondering - but in the good way of eagerly waiting to find people to discuss and dissect. Garland trusts his audience to come along without having their hands held. There are many portions of the film, where a less trusting filmmaker would have continued on to inserted a particular shot or some explaining line to bring a concept home. Especially in the bonkers third act, which both brings everything to conclusion and goes full crazygonuts. Garland doesn't play it safe and I applaud him for it. It's too bad many will not, to be left cold by not having it all spoon-fed and wrapped in a bow. I’ve talked concept, but it wouldn’t have worked without a great cast to usher through Area X. The Biologist, played by Natalie Portman is the audience anchor, searching for answers for her husband Oscar Isaac’s reappearance 18 months after venturing into Area X. Like the other 4 women - Jennifer Jason Leigh’s aloof Psychologist, Gina Rodriguez's tough Paramedic, Tessa Thompson’s quiet Physicist, and Tuva Novotny’s Geologist; the Biologist is self-destructing and looking for something to hold on to. Many may say we don’t really get to know these women. I say that is much the point. This isn’t a trained squad; these are individuals there for their own internatal reasons. No one is open to fully bond; but instead to be torn apart and changed by their environment. Annihilation sticks with the audience. An appreciative audience will be as changed and altered as the characters. Garland made a new sci-fi masterpiece in EX MACHINA a; and he has done so again. Audiences will debate and and re-watch. Now if we can only get enough to see it that first time. A… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

2

ManutddabestFeb 28, 2018

Why is an Oscar winner acting in this heap of thrash. Cheap effects and lousy storyline. For real sci fi, watch Underworld. I support Man Utd!

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

9

MaxJadueFeb 27, 2018

With mesmerizing visuals, a chilling score, and strong performances, Alex Garland's book to film adaption "Annihilation" doesn't disappoint. From start to finish, your eyes are glued to the screen and you can't look away from an almostWith mesmerizing visuals, a chilling score, and strong performances, Alex Garland's book to film adaption "Annihilation" doesn't disappoint. From start to finish, your eyes are glued to the screen and you can't look away from an almost masterpiece of a film, leaving the audience with chills down their spines. "Annihilation" is sure to go down as one of the great Sci-Fi films and, no doubt, one of the best films of the year thus far.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

7

Compi24Feb 27, 2018

Like writer/director Alex Garland's last effort, "Ex Machina," "Annihilation" -- for me at least -- is a rich, entertaining, and scientifically thought-provoking ride from beginning to. . .about ten minutes from the end. And though this one'sLike writer/director Alex Garland's last effort, "Ex Machina," "Annihilation" -- for me at least -- is a rich, entertaining, and scientifically thought-provoking ride from beginning to. . .about ten minutes from the end. And though this one's ending is definitely less of a buzzkill, there's still an overall sense of coldness and confusion that I can't seem to shake. So much of the film's first 90% feels so meticulously well thought-out and crafted. Whether its from a visual, thematic, or character-based standpoint, the majority of this movie rings true. It's just the last sliver of the running time that adds so much, yet explains so little, ultimately rendering everything into one of the most frustrating additions to the sci-fi genre I've seen in recent memory.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

1

shermyFeb 26, 2018

I went to see it because of the good ratings. But the acting and dialogue were poor. The story-line lacked a backbone. The movie was filled with two things, Natalie Portman frowning and shooting her AR-15, and second rate CGI. I think thatI went to see it because of the good ratings. But the acting and dialogue were poor. The story-line lacked a backbone. The movie was filled with two things, Natalie Portman frowning and shooting her AR-15, and second rate CGI. I think that the plot was defective because you never could get a clear vision of the adversary. It just seemed like an amalgam of random special effects and strange uninteresting life forms.

They even threw in some generic sex scenes that had just about nothing to do with the plot (and almost nothing to do with sex).

The last time I saw a movie this bad was "Lobster".… Expand

8 of 18 users found this helpful810

All this user's reviews

Annihilation

User Reviews