Annihilation
Paramount Pictures | Release Date: February 23, 2018
7.1
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 990 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
698
Mixed:
170
Negative:
122
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
1
SkateNYFeb 25, 2018
Bring a book. Or your Kindle device.

It’s been said that the only legitimate philosophical question is in the form of “Why is there something instead of nothing?” Annihilation reverses the two subjects of that question. I don’t mean toBring a book. Or your Kindle device.

It’s been said that the only legitimate philosophical question is in the form of “Why is there something instead of nothing?” Annihilation reverses the two subjects of that question.

I don’t mean to dismiss anyone’s experience in watching the film, but I found nothing intellectually challenging about either the story. The largely meaningless interpersonal exchanges among and between the characters offered little in the way of much-needed distraction. The scientific revelations that at least three characters advance during their slow walk to a parking lot in a mall that closed decades ago are earth-shattering only if your imagination doesn’t allow for the existence of other forms of life. Even their hypotheses were dull. And you don’t need to be a biologist to figure out what’s different within the alien forest (the writers use the word “shimmer”) in comparison to everyday, carbon-based existence. I won’t give my explanation here since it may be one of a few mundane mysteries in a script that favors only those who delight in disappointment.

The narrative is both uninspired and uninspiring, and the writers provide several opportunities to stop caring about the story and the characters. Unfortunately, this apparent attempt to tamper enthusiasm about the project and the characters who work ay getting us to dislike them spills over into the ending which then steers viewers to ask themselves a very limited set of questions about what may have happened in the film. At least those who were still interested enough to care. I was not among them. I also had the dreaded “embarrassed-for-someone-else” experience more than once, both for a meandering story that seems satisfied to make halfhearted attempts at being interesting and the portrayal of a land that was too often straining to be different in ways that might move viewers to be left in awe. Never happened. CGI and special effects are bland; nothing new to see here that hasn’t already been portrayed (badly) in Sci-Fi TV series. A walk through a rain forest is more visually compelling, even if taken on the National Geographic Channel. The alien world that’s presented evokes images of a darker though ultimately lackluster Walt Disney World in a sometimes cartoonish way rather than shuttling back and forth through the multiple levels of being presented in Interstellar. It portrays a different kind of reality as a blunt object in a world that cries out in desperation for a finer, simpler touch. What’s supposed to be frightening is too often unwittingly comical; the gravity of the mission and the vulnerability of the characters lose their narrative force as a result. (If you haven’t seen it, check out The Forbidden Planet -- a film released more than sixty years ago -- for its compelling narrative and limited but, within the context of the story, realistic special effects.)

Annihilation is not worth seeing, even if you have MoviePass. Not a single “ooh” or “aah” throughout though there was some suppressed laughter along the way. Probably the worst movie I’ve seen in more than a year. I doubt that Annihilation will show up on a “One Hundred Underrated Sci-Fi Movies from Twenty Years Ago” list. There just isn’t very much to it.… Expand
18 of 28 users found this helpful1810
All this user's reviews
2
DoxdivaFeb 25, 2018
Don't waste your time on this movie..it's awful. The only reason I gave it a 2 is because of the soundtrack.
19 of 33 users found this helpful1914
All this user's reviews
10
joylitFeb 23, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "Annihilation" is based on a novel of the same name by Jeff Vandermeer, a writer specialized in a sci-fi/fantasy sub-genre known as "Weird Fiction". This book is the first from a trilogy: the "Southern Reach Trilogy"; however, director/screenwriter Alex Garland ("Ex Machina") wrote this adaptation before the next two books were even published. "Annihilation" follows the story of a Lena, a biologist with military background, whose life has been shattered by the disappearance of her soldier husband who had gone on a secret mission into an ecological disaster area presumably harboring by an alien presence. At the beginning of the movie, we witness the return of the hubby, who unexpectedly comes back home in a confused mental state, soon becomes ill and is taken to a secret facility together with his wife. The place is a scientific research installation, built on the vecinity of an ever growing quarentined site known as "Area X", which comprises a coastal area and its adjacent forest, permanently enveloped in a phenomenon called "the shimmer"; this is an iridiscent wall of light that enshrouds the entire area, disconnecting it from the external world, which originated years prior when a meteorite hit a nearby lighthouse. Little is known about what is going on on the other side of "the shimmer", since several expeditions have gone missing and its members are presumably dead. Lena will meet doctor Vendress, a psychologist and authority figure, who explains to her that her husband is in the facility, suffering from multiple organ failure and massive bleeding. Both women agree that Lena should be part of the next expedition to Area X (it is argued she might be able to find a cure for her ailing husband), an all-female team that includes the rather obscurely motivated psychologist, all of whom seem to have very little to lose appart from their own lives. The movie weaves different timelines in a very seamless way: the very beginning is an interrogation scene where Lena is being inquired by a scientist about her experience in the Area X and the fate of her party; the second timeline kicks off with the husband's reappearance and continues with Lena meeting the members of the expedition and departing into the unknown. There are also flashbacks of Lena's immediate past with her husband, which provides information about their relationship that is crucial for establishing the dramatic core of the story. Alex Garland shows an assured hand with the complex narative, a combination of economy and elegance that that is both elocuent and easy to follow; this allows him to introduce different layers of meaning within the narrative (psychological, scientific, philosophical), and to tackle big themes without becoming pretentious or obtuse. The movie has memorable dialogue not included in the original novel and the characters are much more fleshed out (the conversation between the biologist and the psychologist about the nature of self destruction is a highlight, and a pivotal moment in the film).
As someone who have read the books, I have taken notice of the multiple changes that have been introduced by Garland, and even though a favorite character and storyline from the novel have been eliminated, and some elements have traded background/foreground places, I appreciate the way the director has made this story his own, taking enough from the book to make the story recognizable, but at the same time making his own interpretations and connections, expanding on its themes and characters. There is much wonder, weirdness and visual poetry to be found in the beautiful and exceptionally well crafted film, and to my surprise there is also plenty body horror and sudden outbursts of gnaly monster action, with one scene being particularly brutal and effective. This is a film where you can clearly appreciate the simbiotic relationship between these two highly imaginative thinkers, maybe the best collaboration since Kubrick and Arthrur C. Clarke in "2001: An Space Odyssey"). "Annihilation" represents the type of reflexive science fiction that ponders about our place in the cosmos, our intrinsic mutability, and the horrors this conjures; it amounts to a surreal, sciency phantasmagoria about desintegrating identity, deeply rooted in cosmic horror. It is the rare high concept movie that is both extremely entertaining and dazzingly thought provoking. And I have no words to describe that climax apart from saying it left me in complete awe. This is for sure a new sci-fi classic that consolidates Garland as one of the major sci-fi visionaries of our time.… Expand
25 of 45 users found this helpful2520
All this user's reviews
1
JlarFeb 23, 2018
This was one of the the most pretentious and awful Sci Fi horror'esque movies I have seen in a long time. Save your money. Terrible casting, Jennifer Jason Leigh is so bad I actually almost fell asleep. The rest of the supporting cast isThis was one of the the most pretentious and awful Sci Fi horror'esque movies I have seen in a long time. Save your money. Terrible casting, Jennifer Jason Leigh is so bad I actually almost fell asleep. The rest of the supporting cast is terrible. Terrible dialogue as well. One scene in particular with Portman and her colleague in a private moment actually made me laugh out loud. That never happens to me. The movie has no idea what it wants to be. The ending is NOT thought provoking, it's lazy, under developed and full of superficial substance leaving the innards as hollow as can be. I didn't even pay to see this and felt robbed. This is coming from a life long sci Fi and horror junkie. I loved ex machina but this was a huge let down. What is wrong with critics? If they are rating the movie based on visual aesthetics and a diverse cast meaning ladies only, then sure this is an 8 out of 10, but when digging deeper, this is a hollowed out experience with little substance, much like the majority of new theatrical IP we are seeing today. This was a mish mash of ex machina, the thing, predator, the arrival etc... You're better off sticking to those movies, they did it better...1/10 for me.… Expand
22 of 48 users found this helpful2226
All this user's reviews
6
blastgordonApr 5, 2018
Not the best perfomance of Natalie Portman, and probably to expensive ... some effects are poorly and especially the scene which shows the outside of the house, CGI??? Its an awesome idea, but for me it was poorly written, it needs someNot the best perfomance of Natalie Portman, and probably to expensive ... some effects are poorly and especially the scene which shows the outside of the house, CGI??? Its an awesome idea, but for me it was poorly written, it needs some tension, when it’s building up, it is falling down very quickly. It feels like it is trying to find a claustrophobic feeling. It is overrated, I rather take my time to watch the first Alien movie the 100th time again!… Expand
7 of 7 users found this helpful70
All this user's reviews
5
twkonefalApr 20, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. None of the decisions these characters make any sense.

After years of the "shimmer" existing, they plow deep into it the exact same way they have since the beginning. Let's not bother sticking a hand in and pulling it out then studying the result. They say "... nothing ever came out". Throw something in, pull it out with a rope. SMH.

There are many other examples of characters making stupid decisions which constantly pulled me out of the suspension of belief and enjoyment of an otherwise interesting premise.… Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
5
DodgerMar 14, 2018
This felt like a film that had potential, but squandered it in a weird predicatable twist and an overly arty last 10-15 minutes. Some of the effects and scenes were really well done, offset by some weird story line focuses and glaring andThis felt like a film that had potential, but squandered it in a weird predicatable twist and an overly arty last 10-15 minutes. Some of the effects and scenes were really well done, offset by some weird story line focuses and glaring and frequent plot holes.

If youv got Netflix and you like sci-fi give it a watch, seeing as its free, otherwise you can safely give it a miss.… Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
5
RealMuthaFMar 17, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. After "Ex Machina" I expected more from director Alex Garland. Annihilation is pretentious, boring and ultimately style over substance.

The premise itself is intriguing - there is an expanding supernatural Zone out of which nobody has returned, except for Natalie Portman's husband, who appears to have no memory of prior events. Portman herself is a university professor who presumed her husband dead.

However, everything goes downhill really quick. First, literally on the 3rd minute of the movie we are shown a comet hitting a lighthouse, which immediately eliminates any mystery regarding the Zone's origins, as it's clearly extraterrestrial. Then we are led to believe that the Zone has been expanding for 3 years already. And what has the government organization overseeing it done in the meantime? Perhaps, send a large-scale military/scientific expedition with lots of gear and vehicles? Well no Sir! They have only sent a few small teams, none of which ever communicate or come back. So, by the movie's events, the current squad consists of 5 suicidal women who barely have any relevant skills for the mission. And while all are "scientists", the only person who tries to do some research is Portman, who at least takes biological samples along the way.

And how our 5 girl-scouts act once they enter the zone is unspeakable. They go in without any protective gear(!) and only M4s for weapons(!!), with only Portman having prior shooting experience(!!!), follow no plan and just wander around wasting time(!!!!) and leave no marks to be able to find their way back, as GPS and even compasses don't work(!!!!!).

Besides the sci-fi-ish premise, the movie also has some horror elements, so there are obligatory scenes of a team member being snatched from behind, and one team member losing their mind and acting hostile towards others. The latter scene looks very lame, by the way. There is some suspense in the film, but not enough of it.

While Annihilation has some pretty, albeit low-budget, imagery, the story feels like its writer just came up with some creepy moments but didn't care to stitch them together in any sensible way. There isn't any sense in Thessa Thompson's turning into some sort of discount Poison Ivy and disappearing. There isn't any sense or consistency in the CG-alien's actions. Why has it "entered" Jennifer Jason-Leigh and obliterated her? Why hasn't it done so with Portman, and played some copycat game instead? The alien core can be burned to the ground with a single phosphorus grenade, really? Why didn't Isaac's duplicate (whose reveal was as obvious and predictable as possible) also burn down, while all the other alien constructs were destroyed?

The answer to all those questions is because the writer did a sh***y job, that's why. Unfortunately, Annihilation is a disappointment.… Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
4
DovahKJul 2, 2018
Realmente parece más interesante de lo que es, se queda en película del montón diga de ver en televisión a las cuatro de la tarde en cualquier canal para rellenar el tiempo hasta el prime time
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
5
gamer1234Oct 26, 2018
A shallow movie with pretentions of depth. Full of paper-thin pseudoscience and vague handwavings towards cosmic mind, as well as guns and monsters. Some cool digital art and some atmospheric scene setting, but altogether it falls far shortA shallow movie with pretentions of depth. Full of paper-thin pseudoscience and vague handwavings towards cosmic mind, as well as guns and monsters. Some cool digital art and some atmospheric scene setting, but altogether it falls far short of what it wishes it was. Given other people's ratings I really expected more.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
DukeJonNov 21, 2022
Go and see John Carpenter's "The Thing" instead. It's a much better movie than what's on offer here. A confused movie with underwhelming characters and a payoff which you can see 100 miles away. Not enough scares for a horror movie. NotGo and see John Carpenter's "The Thing" instead. It's a much better movie than what's on offer here. A confused movie with underwhelming characters and a payoff which you can see 100 miles away. Not enough scares for a horror movie. Not enough action for an action movie. Not enough psychology for a psychological thriller.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
bobpotatoJan 9, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie starts with a spoiler for the whole movie. That made me very angry. The caracters are acting very unreal and
the end is one of the baddest ending i ever seen in a movie.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
CathexisArcanaMar 27, 2018
I like to keep my reviews brief and in list form, so I will assume the reader has a basic understanding of the movie's plot and and an awareness of the main cast. PROS:

-Interesting concept, and has at least a good sense of mystery at theI like to keep my reviews brief and in list form, so I will assume the reader has a basic understanding of the movie's plot and and an awareness of the main cast. PROS:

-Interesting concept, and has at least a good sense of mystery at the beginning. I like the general idea of a phenomenon causing rapid mutations / evolution in a contained area.

-Solid cast (if not entirely accurate, ahem). Although Gina Rodriguez was weirdly channeling Michelle Rodriguez for some reason. Still, it's Jane, so it's fine.

-There was a moment with a certain mutant bear that was genuinely creepy AF. Also, slithering intestines.

CONS:

-The backstory of Lena (Portman) is slow and nuanced to the point of being boring. She and her husband (Isaac) don't really have strong enough chemistry in the beginning to make us care about their relationship and what happens to them -- or at least I didn't.

-The visual look of the "Shimmer" was not effectively alien to me. It just seemed like a soapy, rainbow-hued veneer, like something you would see in a music video.

-Portman's ragtag team were not interesting or developed (even as supporting characters), and there was very little interplay between them to provide a reason to care what happened to them.

-The ending, while visually interesting, was entirely unsatisfying and inexplicable. Then again, I'm not a fan of the pretentious "so vague it's genius" tactic that some high-minded movies aim for. But the alien mime-off was still kinda cool...… Expand
7 of 8 users found this helpful71
All this user's reviews
4
DamnedThingMar 20, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Another one of those what ifs that could have been so much better with a more experienced director. One of the problems with Garland is that he's idolised as a voice of a generation and so carries a weight of expectation on anything he puts his hand to. Along with that, there's more a hint of fawning from British reviewers - so knock at least a star off Empire and Guardian reviews.

Ex Machina was relatively tight, set in a confined space with few characters, it did pose some good questions on AI, humanity, and ego, before setting them aside to focus on manipulation and thrills.

Annihilation is broader in scope but less interesting, less well structured, and confused about what it wants to be; tonally it shifts all over the place. It begins with a meteorite hitting earth. It carries a life form that replicates and mutates across species, as well as between plant and animal. Its effects are spreading outwards from the point of impact at an increasing rate, and the edge of its area of influence can be seen as a shimmer. Teams of people have gone into the 'shimmer', but none have ever come out.

Then one man does, except there's something wrong with him: he's bleeding internally and apparently close to dying. His wife joins up with a team going into the Shimmer in order to get to the source in the hopes that she'll find something that will help.

This is all standard fare for Science Fiction - it's kind of The Andromeda Strain meets War of the Worlds meets Contact meets Alien meets Deliverance; the basic set up could be told in minutes, but it takes forever to get its arse in gear. That's a big part of the problem, the film can't decide what tone to take - it starts off as a drama, then tries to switch up gears to being an adventure into the unknown before switching gears again to survivor horror before going for something trippy.

It just doesn't gel as a whole story, it's more a collection of influences strung together in a manner that's less than the sum of its parts.

Natalie Portman does well with a character who has to be strong enough to survive but who seems too often to be asked to play her part as over-wrought. She's fearless bringing down sharkgator, but that moment is the only one where she seems in command of herself.

Jennifer Jason Leigh rasps her way through things with scene stealing disinterest, which is at least notable. Everyone else is cardboard thin so that by the time they start disappearing one by one, as people in these things are wont to do, it's impossible to care either way.

Aside from Sharkgator there's a Cowbear auditioning for a sequel to the Revenant but it fails because it makes our 13yo boy laugh - this scene goes on far too long and is so clumsily handled that any necessary tension for it to work is lost in a miasma of hohumness. There's another faux Alien bit that's supposedly gory, but again the fakery can be seen a mile off so that when things happen there's no shock or disgust. The idea of an alien virus mutating DNA is interesting, but here it's just used as background wallpaper onto which has been slapped a generic story about a group of red shirts on a mission where things go wrong and they die one by one until there's a lone survivor left. The more interesting story to me was what was happening with Oscar Isaacs character. He turns up bleeding internally on the brink of dying but somehow manages to survive for months - what happened there? Was he being studied? Did they find a 'cure'? He's obviously been quarantined so they must have done tests, even at a cellular level there must have been some discrepancies? How come neither of them turned into tree people?

There are no shocks. There's no horror. It's a bit gory in one scene. There are no thrills at all. The pacing is clunky. It looks very pretty in one or two places.

This isn't so much a deliberately slow-paced film as a low energy one consumed by indecision. Paramount dodged a bullet by Netflixing it.

Meh!… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
6
AcaciaFeb 27, 2018
For the most part, this was a pretty good movie. Loved the scary parts and the story is very intriguing. I was totally feeling it all the way until the end when I just got a bit lost. Still not completely sure what exactly was going on orFor the most part, this was a pretty good movie. Loved the scary parts and the story is very intriguing. I was totally feeling it all the way until the end when I just got a bit lost. Still not completely sure what exactly was going on or exactly what happened at the end, but it was a bit out there for me. I thought the first at least 45 minutes were kind of slow for me. I just wanted the story to get going. Once it did get going, it was very engrossing and I was really along for the ride. It just kind of left me in the dust in the end.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
6
ishadowMar 12, 2018
If you're even remotely interested, watch it on Netflix.
It's a weird movie, pretty much average in everything.
There's no highlights really, but bad moments aren't too often or important. It could better, it could have more logical plot, butIf you're even remotely interested, watch it on Netflix.
It's a weird movie, pretty much average in everything.
There's no highlights really, but bad moments aren't too often or important.
It could better, it could have more logical plot, but it doesn't matter in the end. It's a simple movie, with simple plot, and a lot of overused themes. You watch in anticipation for a big twist or something innovating, but you won't get it.

Pretty much very similar quality to Prometheus or Alien: Covenant. A bit more artistic, but same in the end.

I would regret going to cinema, but it's OK for a Netflix movie, especially with good HDR.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
5
bkristmanMar 13, 2018
A film that tries to make you think you should like it more than you do just because it's 'artsy'.
Wooden,comatose uninspired acting and dialogue .
Starts getting interesting at the end but by then it's too little too late.
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
9
temptershellMar 12, 2018
This spectacle is not for everyone and I have to make it clear. This film is a very oneiric, story that does not fully give any answer, and the attempt to translate the novel was, in my opinion, an unrealizable project - and it was doneThis spectacle is not for everyone and I have to make it clear. This film is a very oneiric, story that does not fully give any answer, and the attempt to translate the novel was, in my opinion, an unrealizable project - and it was done great. Beautiful pictures, wonderful music and a plot that gives a lot to think about, even opening the mind.… Expand
10 of 13 users found this helpful103
All this user's reviews
7
Solid_SnackFeb 23, 2018
The movie and the book(s) are so very different, yet the book offers integral insight into what the movie is trying to achieve. I can see how the movie might fail some who didn't read the book. I'd probably have to see it again to reach aThe movie and the book(s) are so very different, yet the book offers integral insight into what the movie is trying to achieve. I can see how the movie might fail some who didn't read the book. I'd probably have to see it again to reach a more definitive conclusion.… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
7
Mafia1Mar 17, 2018
The visuals are stunning. The plot not so much. The take of not explaining or simplifying keeps you curious. the gory stuff is just about right. a new idea at least for me that an alien invasion will not be about guns and destruction can beThe visuals are stunning. The plot not so much. The take of not explaining or simplifying keeps you curious. the gory stuff is just about right. a new idea at least for me that an alien invasion will not be about guns and destruction can be so much more scarier and invisible and uncontrollable.… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
5
JDDallas1Apr 8, 2018
HIGHLIGHTS of this movie were all in trailer..and I get real angry when moive is hyped to be one thing (action flick) when it is basically another (head trip)..FAR more slow and cerebral than action. I was bored and disappointed. Tone andHIGHLIGHTS of this movie were all in trailer..and I get real angry when moive is hyped to be one thing (action flick) when it is basically another (head trip)..FAR more slow and cerebral than action. I was bored and disappointed. Tone and pace reminded me of The Arrival..if you liked THAT then by all means give this look..just IMO wait for DVD..maybe a 5 is a little unfair..but then again you got my money and time cuz you led me to believe this was gonna be an action roller coaster..and I was stoked for THAT.. not some lame kiddie ride… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
5
jazzy_jeffFeb 27, 2018
A great soundtrack and cool overall style don't make up for the disappointing realization that Annihilation is ultimately a very shallow film. You just think it's going to end up having more to say.
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
6
MustardTiger4Feb 24, 2018
Feeling underwhelmed from this. Typically with a good sci-fi movie, I leave the theater thinking about the movie and it's implications in our daily lives. In the vein of Ex Machina's exploration of consciousness and artificial intelligence'sFeeling underwhelmed from this. Typically with a good sci-fi movie, I leave the theater thinking about the movie and it's implications in our daily lives. In the vein of Ex Machina's exploration of consciousness and artificial intelligence's need for humans, Arrival's dissection of time, and even Blade Runner 2049's creation of a feeling through the exploration of a consciousness in a dystopic future.

Here, we have what feels like a typical survival movie wrapped in some interesting biological science. The major difference is that, the plot of surviving feels more central to the movie than the human implications of this biological phenomenon. I think a good sci-fi movie should package this in the reverse, where the plot is simply the device they express their greater idea. This was absolutely lacking in Annihilation.

Maybe it's because I went into this with the expectation of an Arrival-like experience, that I left disappointed.… Expand
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
8
ElWrayMar 14, 2018
Annihilation is a movie I personally needed. In more general terms, I think it show's everyone how a great movie is made. Great cast of characters. It's mostly female, but it does it in class. Never does it feel like it wants to beAnnihilation is a movie I personally needed. In more general terms, I think it show's everyone how a great movie is made. Great cast of characters. It's mostly female, but it does it in class. Never does it feel like it wants to be "culturally important" but it just tells a story where the main characters 'just so happen' to be women. The acting and writing overall was mature and left a lot to the imagination. Besides that the visuals and score (oh my god that score) were mind blowing. Besides that I think it's best if you go in blank en just experience it for yourself to make your own conclusions. In the end I think that, when everyone forgot about Marvel movies in the next decade, this one will still be fondly remembered by artists, creative people, people who have the ability to enjoy and understand abstraction and intellectual theme's. It's very high on my list of 'best of the decade' so far. Would recommend it to anyone, but it's a must see for fans of good sci-fi/horror.… Expand
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
7
Tcurran2Feb 23, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Annihilation may not be entirely successful, but when it works, it really clicks. The last act's ambition was set for the stars, which is why it was such a shame to see the first 2/3rds carry on as a standard sci-fi schlock fest riddled with clunky dialogue and genre cliches. Coming off the success of Ex Machina, writer/director Alex Garland is probably one of the few individuals who would've been able to get this film made, being as strange as it is. The studio appears to have little faith in the project, as they've dumped the international release straight to Netflix. Substantively, Ex Machina this film is not. Though Annihilation's final images leave something for the viewer to chew on, Lena (Natalie Portman) and the rest of the group of female scientists assigned to investigate "the shimmer" are not nearly as compelling as Alicia Vikander and Domnhall Gleeson were in Garland's previous directorial effort. The mystery and suspense built up during the film's first act is quickly dissipated as CGI creatures come barreling through forest environments to pick off the group members. When Annihilation is subtle, it is at its creepy best. Unfortunately though, the script is nowhere near subdued nor intelligent enough to sustain compelling drama for the length of its two hour run time. The rumbling, ethereal sound design does most of the heavy lifting in providing the appropriate atmosphere. The operatic chorus that accompanies Lena and the squad's revelations is a nice touch. Largely how one will feel about this film is their reaction once Natalie Portman reaches the Lighthouse. I bought into it. Its creepy. Its disturbing. But most of all, it carries the film's intellectual heft. Self-destruction is the theme, but you're liable to self destruct yourself after trying to wrap your head around the film's final images. But that fundamentally is what keeps things interesting.… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
6
eagleeyevikingApr 6, 2018
More vague than illuminating, "Annihilation" is captivating throughout but ends up feeling like it grasped more than it could hold.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
Captain105Aug 6, 2018
The effects and analog in annihilation are stellar with lots of colors and monsters. A good movie isn’t just affects and monsters it needs a relatable storyline that the audience understands and this was lacking it. The shimmer has noThe effects and analog in annihilation are stellar with lots of colors and monsters. A good movie isn’t just affects and monsters it needs a relatable storyline that the audience understands and this was lacking it. The shimmer has no realistic laws and this makes it sloppy. At any point you can learn a new weird thing that has nothing to do with the movie. It was still going all right and interesting until we got to the end of the movie where (like all movies) it went down hill. I don’t think even the directors know what it means. Audience will love a movie if it is incomprehensible and will think it is brilliant, but I’m not so sure.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
annbdJan 16, 2019
The 'I don't know' movie shows how stupid looking are the too many 'I don't know-s' answers. Visually stunning, great effects, nice to watch. It's not waste of time, because you see the potential - there is a big one. You can see how theThe 'I don't know' movie shows how stupid looking are the too many 'I don't know-s' answers. Visually stunning, great effects, nice to watch. It's not waste of time, because you see the potential - there is a big one. You can see how the imagination of the story teller has grown in the first 45 minutes and then suddenly stopped - literately you can see the end of this imagination.I hope this movie has remake, it would be very interesting Sci-Fi to watch, but now it is not finished.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
SeussMyTubSep 2, 2018
It starts off real well, but like all Alex Garland movies, it peters out in the end.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
LordOMOApr 4, 2020
Annihilation is a very fascinating SciFi movie and something I would reccomend to everyone with an interest in cosmic horror.
I think something that will rub people the wrong way is that there is a huge plot hole early on in the movie inAnnihilation is a very fascinating SciFi movie and something I would reccomend to everyone with an interest in cosmic horror.
I think something that will rub people the wrong way is that there is a huge plot hole early on in the movie in order to get the story going. But if you can look past that and have an interest in thoughtful SciFi movies you will be very pleased with the themes presented in this movie as well as the audiovisual experience it provides. Following the group of characters decent further and further into the unknown was both fascinating and thrilling.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
greenisgoodNov 12, 2018
TL;DR Another case of misleading trailers contributing to negative reviews as well as another case of 'WTF Was That ?' just like John Carpenters The Thing which was similarly snubbed for being stupid and gory with no explanations, it is aTL;DR Another case of misleading trailers contributing to negative reviews as well as another case of 'WTF Was That ?' just like John Carpenters The Thing which was similarly snubbed for being stupid and gory with no explanations, it is a whole different case now and similarly I think this movie will gain a cult status.

Also I completely understand the negative reviews since even I went into the movie expecting just another Action Sci-Fi FX fest with over-exposition of plot points which propel the killing of human imagination. Personally I enjoyed it every time someone in the movie said "I Don't Know". It is amazing to let you own imagination interpret what is happening.

The acting is solid all around, the atmosphere was enjoyably scary, the all female Team not acting like unnecessary SJW Champions (aka Ghostbusters 2016) was refreshing.
The CGI was not the most excellent at all times but will fill you with dread when needed and get you confused and horrified, the music was also a big part in the overall experience.

Though it is quite a slow burn I encourage everyone to keep aside any expectations of a conventional action sci-fi and just watch this movie with an open mind and let your imagination wander.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
thefakepierreNov 12, 2019
A great omage to Lovecraft!!! It's just the CGI in some parts that is kinda off. Really love the cinematography and sound.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
DiptanshuApr 1, 2020
Beautiful and calm!awesome screenplay,score,story and acting it kept me engaging and made me feel whats behind this everything and ending was awesome as hell!A great movie!
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
jared1209Feb 5, 2020
Brilliant film that is thought provoking with refreshingly original ideas and terrific use of scifi tropes. Maybe this experience should be endured sober otherwise you may have no idea whats going on.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
ajzeg01Sep 21, 2019
This movie was awesome! It was written for the screen (it’s based on a book) and directed by Alex Garland, who also wrote 28 Days Later and wrote/directed Ex Machina, one of my personal favourite sci-fi films! Annihilation is very much in theThis movie was awesome! It was written for the screen (it’s based on a book) and directed by Alex Garland, who also wrote 28 Days Later and wrote/directed Ex Machina, one of my personal favourite sci-fi films! Annihilation is very much in the same vein as Ex Machina, it is a thinking person's artsy sci-fi film (with horror elements). That genre does not appeal to everyone, but if you like sci-fi like Arrival, Blade Runner, Star Trek, 2001: A Space Odyssey, THX 1138 or, of course, Ex Machina, you will probably get a kick out of it! I actually don’t know how much detail I want to go into about this movie, I went in completely blind and was very pleasantly surprised! It only had a short theatrical run before being dumped on Netflix so I never saw any trailers or any promotional material. I had never even heard of it until recently, so I recommend that you just watch it without knowing anything about it. You’ll be glad you did! It’s a hidden gem! Also, it has an all-female main cast, if you care about that sort of thing.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
AWESOM-0Jan 27, 2020
Better the second time around, but still not that good. It kind of changes the basis of what the novel is about, not minor changes but major. I’m on the fence on whether it’s good or bad seeing as I was not a huge fan of the novel to begin with.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
VancomycinFeb 24, 2018
With all the depth and most delightful elements of a Michael Crichton film (Jurassic Park, Sphere) and the visuals of a James Cameron movie (think The Abyss) you'll leave the theater thinking about this one for a few days.
11 of 17 users found this helpful116
All this user's reviews
9
ViniciusBritoMar 13, 2018
When, possibly, a meteor falls on Earth and hit a lighthouse in an isolated location creating a bubble called "The shimmer" that anything that cross it, never comes back. The mysterious bubble keep expanding and taking more land with anyoneWhen, possibly, a meteor falls on Earth and hit a lighthouse in an isolated location creating a bubble called "The shimmer" that anything that cross it, never comes back. The mysterious bubble keep expanding and taking more land with anyone apart of what is going on. During one expedition, one person returns for the firs time, Kane(Soldier), Husband of Lena (Biologist, ex military), he comes different and she wants to understand what happend inside the dome.
This movie is by essence sci-fi but have a bunch of elements from horror and thriller that worked highly, using many open plans for you to get tense that something could come out from here or there technically this movie is phenomenal. I loved the cinematography that they presented, a bunch of moments they show the image obfuscated, with some blur, refracted.. Giving signs of what actually hapens in the shimmer, they show hands touching themselves on the other side of a glass of water, things that will echo later on. The scenario are just phenomenal, the way that they put the forest was simply amazing, how it was dominating the hole place and creating things, making something evolved.. this part really reminded me of the last of us, some scenes and places of the movie, the hole scenario, it gave me flashes from the game.
I like how the movie could be a metaphor for somethings, like for us, that couldn't let the natives dress what they wanted and put on them what we dressed, can't make it to a new place and let it how it is, not just refering to people, but to nature itself, modifying stuff. To a cancer, where want to face it, other fight(showing that you end up becoming what you fight against) or neither of those, leading that the cancer are oursleves. This movie is much about self-destruction, like a cancer, when everybody is blaming themselves or did something that literally destroyed them, is getting themselves destructed.
The track of the movie also are great, having somethings that complete the scene, sometimes with something supernatural, exemplifying in sound what is going on, sometimes a calm and peaceful that complete the beautiful environment, wich remembered me a lot of the last of us as well. Some moments of panic and scary being well represented by the song as well, helping to let you tense.
All the acting worked here, Natalie Portman can express herself with eyes and mouth, passing an idea of doubt and at the same time without expression, having a pretty good chemistry with Oscar Isaac, that also have a good job with his character, passing the idea of hapiness and later frustration. Gina Rodriguez did a very good job on two different moments of her character. Tessa Thompson as always delivered a much different character as usual, doing a much different interpretation, she is one of my favorite actress right now, her character is the most sweet from all of them and she phrase with calm and wisdom, just how her character is needed. Tuva Novotny did a character that was afraid, but could stand firm. Jennifer Jason Leigh did a hell of a great job, doing expression less character, cold that you can literally feel in her way of talk, in her eyes and mouth that doesn't have anything to lost, are all the way in for whatever she is up to.
The montage of the film, maybe could have be done a little better, some scenes are throw on us that just gonna make sense later on, wich is not bad, but how it is mounted i'm not so sure. The director choose to separate the acts for all of us, pointing the titles of each one.
It's a very pessimistic movie, expressing by metaphors how we are, how we are destroying ourselves and other ones. That all of us in some moment of our lives we ruined life, it's part of human nature destroy to construct or just destroy around you. Philosophical and social criticism, how we rational and evolved can destroy ourselves if we know that it ain't gonna do any good it is a genetic failure in all of us. A movie that will make people discuss and talk about it, keeping people's heads for a long time, wich is great, causing discussions and differently interpretations. Discussing creation, evolution, science, religion and, for sure, humanity.
The movie reminded me of a Fight Club quote: "Maybe self-improvement isn't the answer, maybe self-destruction is the answer."… Expand
11 of 17 users found this helpful116
All this user's reviews
6
wollam11Feb 23, 2018
If you ever wondered what it would look like if an advanced alien race decided to terraform our planet right out from under us, look no further. It's as bizarre, disgusting, and beautiful as anyone has any right to ask for. It will definitelyIf you ever wondered what it would look like if an advanced alien race decided to terraform our planet right out from under us, look no further. It's as bizarre, disgusting, and beautiful as anyone has any right to ask for. It will definitely stick in your mind far longer than most movies do.… Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
7
KannibalMar 4, 2018
Annihilation is a solid film, it features some stunning high-points and drags during a few fallow periods all in all I wanted more from the movie but I enjoyed it. Annihilation will occupies space in you head for a while, in spite of its flaws.
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
8
mdbackesMar 12, 2018
Genuinely intelligent and thoughtful science fiction film that confirms Alex Garland's subtlety as a writer/director, especially after his recent Ex Machina. Veers into Alien/Thing body horror with somewhat mixed results, but stays smart.Genuinely intelligent and thoughtful science fiction film that confirms Alex Garland's subtlety as a writer/director, especially after his recent Ex Machina. Veers into Alien/Thing body horror with somewhat mixed results, but stays smart. Like most of these films, there are a few characters that just seem compelled to make obviously dumb decisions. Hope the studio commissions the rest of the trilogy's adaptation.… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
4
moviecritic68Mar 22, 2018
This sci-fi film was a real "yawner". The acting was sub-par and the story just dragged on & on. If not for some neat special effects I would have voted in the red area. Watching the reaction of the exiting audience I was not alone in myThis sci-fi film was a real "yawner". The acting was sub-par and the story just dragged on & on. If not for some neat special effects I would have voted in the red area. Watching the reaction of the exiting audience I was not alone in my disappointment… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
8
DubeauMar 14, 2018
One of the rare movie that mix well horror and sci-fi together. The story is one of discovery, some fascinating. The actors and actress are pretty well balanced in their performance. No overacting here. The music helps a lot. It's eerie andOne of the rare movie that mix well horror and sci-fi together. The story is one of discovery, some fascinating. The actors and actress are pretty well balanced in their performance. No overacting here. The music helps a lot. It's eerie and mystical. Visually the FX is quite colourful, sometimes stunning or just well placed for a good effect. You get engage in Lena story, mainly because Portman is taking us slowly with her. There is a lot that is not explain in the movie and with it's peoples. That makes the film feels more real. I give it an 85%. Absolutely loved it.… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
2
bobbymcdMar 17, 2018
Slow and boring. Watching it was almost torturous. Can't believe this is getting good reviews. One of the worst films I've seen in some time.

I think some critics are mistaking somber vagueness for profundity.
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
8
arielprimeFeb 24, 2018
Annihilation, directed by Alex Garland is the most intriguing sci-fi film I’ve experienced in a long time. It’s really obscure to describe, but its about an alien meteorite that crash lands in a park on earth and it proceeds to bizarrelyAnnihilation, directed by Alex Garland is the most intriguing sci-fi film I’ve experienced in a long time. It’s really obscure to describe, but its about an alien meteorite that crash lands in a park on earth and it proceeds to bizarrely affect the environment flora and fauna. Natalie Portman delivers a solid performance as well as Gina Rodirguez and Tessa Thompson. To be honest with ya’ll there were plenty of times that I was just looking over to my girl saying “what the hell is going on?” but don’t take it negatively, we were extremely invested. There’s plenty of ambiguity, it really made me think. It’s the kind of film you see and will likely speak for 30 minutes or more about it after watching it. I love that, especially in the sci-fi genre, a film that makes you think. Overall Annihilation is the best sci-fi film I’ve seen in a while, it made me think, beautiful cinematography, super trippy, it made me ask what the hell is going on, and it a visually engaging.… Expand
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
5
robbywarren93Feb 24, 2018
I'm a film nerd but this is a poor man's Arrival. First two acts are solid but the third act ruins it, completely predictable and unoriginal reveal. No wonder why Paramount was scared about this...
9 of 15 users found this helpful96
All this user's reviews
2
RickBellMay 31, 2018
Highly disappointed in this overrated film. It was confusing, boring at many times, very unsatisfying outcome in the end. Totally puzzled why the critics raved about this weird pretentious flick. Stupid plot and stupid movie.
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
7
TVJerryMar 2, 2018
Natalie Portman takes her whack at a sci-fi story, playing a biologist who joins a mission to penetrate the "shimmer" (one of the dumbest visual effects in recent films). She and a crew of 4 other women set out to find what's causing thisNatalie Portman takes her whack at a sci-fi story, playing a biologist who joins a mission to penetrate the "shimmer" (one of the dumbest visual effects in recent films). She and a crew of 4 other women set out to find what's causing this mysterious phenomenon, but they do so very slowly. There are some interesting visuals and one scary scene (the sloth-like monster), but most of its suspense is doled out with lots of anticipation and ominous music. Ultimately, there's a compelling creepiness that propels this puzzle forward, although at a glacial pace.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
7
ernis_vMar 16, 2018
Part Stalker, part Ghostbusters, part the Twilight Saga Soundtrack, part The Tree of Life, part Alien.
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
8
LatinCritic13Feb 23, 2018
For those that seen Alex Garland’s Ex-Machina, get familiar with Annihilation because it’s terrifyingly great. Since Annihilation is based on a book, the director makes us questioned about what is the biology of life behind it. Sure, thisFor those that seen Alex Garland’s Ex-Machina, get familiar with Annihilation because it’s terrifyingly great. Since Annihilation is based on a book, the director makes us questioned about what is the biology of life behind it. Sure, this film did a good job with the female leads, but the whole thing shines on the philosophy of this movie. This film is familiar for those that have seen Denis Villeneuve’s Arrival or played Naughty Dog’s The Last of Us, but it takes in a more serious and terrifying approach that would take audiences in a adventure to unravel the mysteries of life. Moreover, this film has extremely well done cinematography, performances, sound mixing, and visual effects that made it great to watch. Most people may experience this film as a slow jumping-up-to-conclusions film, but it’s Alex Garland’s R-rated gory film that would make you experience the terror as you watch it for the first time.… Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
7
JLuis_001Mar 15, 2018
I don't usually read many reviews of so-called ''professional critics'' because several times they don't manage to be as objective as I would like and in many cases they practically tell you the whole movie, but incredibly I was saturatedI don't usually read many reviews of so-called ''professional critics'' because several times they don't manage to be as objective as I would like and in many cases they practically tell you the whole movie, but incredibly I was saturated with Facebook and Twitter notes about opinions of this film and an interesting pattern was highlighted, and almost all mentioned the same: ''Annihilation, the film that was too smart for the audiences.''

To mention the distribution method the film got it seems irrelevant by now, it's already on Netflix so there's nothing to do anymore. I admit the film would had been a box office failure to have achieved a release in theaters worldwide but that has nothing to do with the film being ''too smart'' for the regular public, but it's because the film is indeed far from any mainstream standard.

I find ridiculous to label Annihilation as a film too smart for the masses, first because it's not and second because mentioning that kind of things is why these types of non-commercial films are completely ignored. By assuming that the product is smarter than the consumer this will inevitably catalog the product as snobbish and pretentious because by assuming the consumers didn't understand the film then you're automatically calling them stupid, even if it's not the case. That is why today ''professional critics'' are already considered tremendously irrelevant.

But speaking of the film, I must say the plot is quite interesting but far from complex, in addition to the fact that the film spoils at the beginning what happened to the characters, it takes away all the mystery to the subject because you no longer feel any link with them, you're just waiting to see what will happen to them and therefore all the narrative and character development is practically null.
Apparently all them have their secrets and dark sides but none of that is explored and therefore when they start to disappear from the screen and from the story you couldn't care less. But at least the most important mystery remains intact and it directs the film until its ending.

Of the cast only Natalie Portman has a real acting weight, the rest of the cast is disposable, I'm sorry but it's true, even Oscar Issac who despite being the trigger of the journey Portman's character, has no real relevance except with the ending.

I really liked the soundtrack, the cinematography, I listened to a lot of complaints about the CGI but I think that if you consider its budget it was quite decent, the production design is also of a very good level, it immerses you in the situation and becomes a real complement to the story.

At the end of the day I think Annihilation is a good movie, it's interesting and entertaining, not so satisfying but rewarding, personally I prefer Garland's debut; Ex Machina but I would recommend the film to anyone without hesitation and I would definitely tell them that it's not too smart for them.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
8
GBG_JasonMar 16, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Love him or hate him, Alex Garland has become popular in the sci-fi and horror community for penning thought provoking films for a number of years. While some of his works have been masterpieces (28 Days Later), others have been commercial and critical bombs (Sunshine). Garland’s latest work, Annihilation, falls somewhere in between.

The film follows Natalie Portman (Black Swan, The Star War Prequel Trilogy) as Lena, a biologist and former Army vet who embarks into what is called the Shimmer. The Shimmer is a mysterious area that appears to reflect light from the outside akin to the colorful patterns you’d see when light shines through a bubble. The entity landed 3 years prior to the film in a southern region of the US and is slowly growing. Every team, electronic device, and animal sent into it has never been heard from again. That is, until Lena’s husband was sent in and returns after being thought dead for a year. Soon after his return, Kane, played by Oscar Isaac (X-Men Apocalypse, Ex Machina), is rushed to the ER after acting extremely strange. He is then transported with his wife to a hidden base just outside of the mysterious environment. In an effort to find out what is wrong with her husband, Lena heads out with a new team in the hopes of unraveling the mystery of the Shimmer.

As the team sets off on foot into the bubble (which perplexed me as to why they did not use some sort of tank or hovercraft), they see that the Shimmer is changing the flora and fauna in dreamlike (or nightmare-ish) ways. Literally, everything that the Shimmer has touched, even abandoned homes and shacks which grow a strange type of mold or moss, have been modified. Flowers that stem from the same root systems will bloom in various flower patterns, and animals feature new defensive and terrifying features to the point they are barely recognizable. In addition to this, the team keeps experiencing a severe loss of time as well as vivid dreams which may be hallucinations, but the film never is clear on this. While we only get insight into the ones experienced by Lena, the rest of the group does mention experiencing similar situations. These story devices are used sparingly and typically offer more insight to Portman’s character, but also cause the film to lose momentum here and there.

The CGI visuals depicting the changes are acceptable and occasionally stunning, although certain creatures, especially those at the end of the film, look somewhat dated. Others, such as one featured heavily in the midpoint of the film, look downright terrifying. The worst part of the visuals are very much like recent episodes of The Walking Dead; a green screen method is used for a backdrop in almost every scene, giving most of the film a “soap opera” look. While it does paint a pretty picture, it’s often a bit too distracting.

The opening of the film hurts the overall story quite a bit – seeing Lena in the facility wearing what looks like prison garbs gives away a lot of the film, since the remaining team’s fate is put out there for the viewer within the first few minutes. The omission of these details would have given the film a much needed boost to the tension, as it does lull at times. The acting pushes the characters outside of the token roles found in the genre, but knowing the rest of the team will die makes it hard to grow attached to them.A

Much like the opening, the ending will divide or disappoint many viewers as it leaves the fate of a few of the surviving characters open to interpretation. Like many of Garland’s other works, the film questions what it is to be human and if some of our worst traits are by choice or incorporated into our DNA, and whether we are self-destructive by nature or if we are this way due to our environment. I found the ending to be fitting, while my wife was a bit let down. Much like the recent Mother!, which I loved and my wife (along with most of the world) hated, the ending will probably define your thoughts on the film.

With a few pacing issues and occasional poor CGI, Annihilation doesn’t break new ground for the genre, but it does ask some thought provoking questions about what it is to truly be human. If you’re a fan of the horror sci-fi genre, this film should not be missed.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
8
jzornotMar 16, 2018
Well, now we know where Paddindton comes from. I mean it means perfect sense: he is a talking bear who can make marmalade. He also tends to walk through shimmery screens and lives somewhere which looks quite similar to the zone.
As to theWell, now we know where Paddindton comes from. I mean it means perfect sense: he is a talking bear who can make marmalade. He also tends to walk through shimmery screens and lives somewhere which looks quite similar to the zone.
As to the movie, the atmosphere draws you in. I didn't really notice how well the actors perfored which for me is a good thing for this type of movie. Overall it's mildly new to the general audience who is typically not into this genre. The clifhanger at thiend was over the top though.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
6
moviemitch96Feb 23, 2018
Disappointing and underwhelming follow-up to Alex Garland's brilliant film 'Ex Machina' if you ask me. Definitely had some huge pacing issues and dragged quite a bit throughout most of it, with only a few moments of real intrigue orDisappointing and underwhelming follow-up to Alex Garland's brilliant film 'Ex Machina' if you ask me. Definitely had some huge pacing issues and dragged quite a bit throughout most of it, with only a few moments of real intrigue or excitement. The whole cast felt under-utilized, and even Natalie Portman had only so much to work with in her lead performance. Overall, like I said, it was definitely pretty disappointing on all counts, with a cast that deserved more of an intriguing story and script to work with, and a story that could've expanded more on its ideas rather than just toying with them.… Expand
9 of 16 users found this helpful97
All this user's reviews
3
RockydogMar 17, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I usually like Scifi. However, keeping in mind that this is fiction there has to be some logic in the movie. For instance if small groups of soldiers kept disappearing why didn't they just send in like 200 tanks at once? Or since the Lighthouse is on the coast, why not approach from the sea? Also they were woefully under-equipped. How about for instance illumination flares? or something heavier than an M-16? I'm a Biologist and I can tell you that the "Biology" in the movie is simply a joke. 99.99999999999% of mutations are fatal. Finally, the acting was just terrible. All of it.… Expand
10 of 18 users found this helpful108
All this user's reviews
0
andrewsalgadoJun 24, 2018
Read the book ... which was problematic. But this was a pile of rubbish, nonsensical crap.
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
9
ohnomrbillMar 8, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. i enjoyed this movie as a metaphor. its about communication and not meeting our humanity in this missed communication. the country is divided into factions, like congress and we never seem to meet as one. this is how i enjoys this movie. yet, as sci fi, at a point near the end, there is an explosion of light which is really cool. at first i was struggling to like it above the horror i was seeing. in the end was an unusual resolve. for me, this was the movie of the year and kind of better than the shape of water which had originality yet the same story as always. this movie was a little different and a little more original.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
8
Geng1sMar 12, 2018
Director has done a great job of taking the themes from the booking and rolling them into a movie that honestly is a lot easier to follow then the books were.

Felt like there were probably some points that needed further explanation butDirector has done a great job of taking the themes from the booking and rolling them into a movie that honestly is a lot easier to follow then the books were.

Felt like there were probably some points that needed further explanation but overall it was a great experience.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
9
JPKMar 3, 2018
Chilling And Mysterious
This Film Is Suspenseful And Intense From Start To Finish.
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
2
rhldrFeb 24, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I kept waiting, and waiting for a unique conclusion with such a meticulous setup. Nope. I did enjoy the music and the visuals effects, especially the last 15 minutes. But the rest was a mix of sci-fi, b-horror "don't go into the dark hole, but there you go", wrapped in a pretentious, intellectual blur wanting to be another Alien movie.… Expand
12 of 22 users found this helpful1210
All this user's reviews
1
ThomassJun 23, 2018
God awful. A mismatched stew of half considered ideas and themes combined with cheesy special effects that cannot be taken seriously. No theme or message dominates, just a collection of pseudo-scientific pretentious trash. I cannot believeGod awful. A mismatched stew of half considered ideas and themes combined with cheesy special effects that cannot be taken seriously. No theme or message dominates, just a collection of pseudo-scientific pretentious trash. I cannot believe the makers weren’t laughing at the positive reviews. Seriously, I would vote it worst movie I have ever seen. If Natalie Portman has to do this sort of movie nonsense we should take up a collection for her. Characters fly in and out, then come back again after they died in prior scenes. Heavy on the gruesome scale but the special effects had me laughing by the end. Should have rated it zero.… Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
9
DeadlyCarrotFeb 24, 2018
This is very likely not a movie that everyone will understand, and that's the whole point. The beginnning is slow, but once it get's good, it stays like that. This is the kind of movie you'll still be thinking about days after, because it'sThis is very likely not a movie that everyone will understand, and that's the whole point. The beginnning is slow, but once it get's good, it stays like that. This is the kind of movie you'll still be thinking about days after, because it's plot actually challenges your mind, which is rare these days. The only issue with this movie is it's slow start and sometimes strange dialogue.… Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
3
OrcfleshMar 17, 2018
This would have died at the box office, not because as some reviews suggest because its too avant garde ...but because its boring.
The characters are expendable and are devoid of any personality.
These are supposed to be intellegent people,This would have died at the box office, not because as some reviews suggest because its too avant garde ...but because its boring.
The characters are expendable and are devoid of any personality.
These are supposed to be intellegent people, but there decisions make no sense.
The actors try their best with a terrible script, but for all their efforts they cant salvage anything.
The story is predictable and formulaic.
The indoor sets are low quality, which is a stark contrast to the great open locations.
The green screen and CGI are poor in general throughout the movie,but more care seems to have gone into the effects in the climax.
There seems to be a trend among 'professional' reviewers at the moment, where anything they can latch onto and call cerebral is touted as a new dawn in cinema and a modern classic.
I assure you, this is not that movie… Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
3
shoulderoforionMar 13, 2018
This gets a big no go from me, guys. This is SciFi 101 blown up into trying to be something it isn't, this isn't transcendent or even close to the same level as Ex Machina, this a boring Invasion Of The Body Snatchers rehash
8 of 16 users found this helpful88
All this user's reviews
9
BrianMcCriticMar 4, 2018
These are the types of films that really captivate the imagination. Annihilation still has me thinking about it a week later and I don't even come close to having all the answers. A
7 of 14 users found this helpful77
All this user's reviews
4
VDSMar 14, 2018
This started off in a very average fashion and went quickly downhill. The people in charge might have been under the impression they were making a ‘think piece’, but not so. This was Sci-Fi by numbers and lucky to even find a home onThis started off in a very average fashion and went quickly downhill. The people in charge might have been under the impression they were making a ‘think piece’, but not so. This was Sci-Fi by numbers and lucky to even find a home on Netflix.

It reminded me a bit of Arrival, insomuch as it was right up itself and adrift at sea on a plot of vapid tripe.

Natalie Portman’s unfortunate cohorts were just there as cannon fodder, to be gobbled up by a not unimpressive beasty. But this wasn’t the thrust of the story, which instead centred around a mysterious lighthouse (Scooby-Doo where are you?), a secret government ops team, missing soldiers and gene mixing aliens. Sound stupid? That’s because it was.

But the best stuff came at the end with super nonsense overdrive and some truly daft scenes between Natalie and the lighthouse keeper.

If you’ve watch the Netflix Cloverfield and then Mute, you’ll know what level of film making craft to expect here. But at least it wasn’t as bad as the uber-ultra hyped not in the least bit scary Veronica, which must surely win the inaugural Netflix Razzie prize.… Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
9
bfoore90Feb 28, 2018
This isn't a movie for everyone, it's a hugely thought provoking and terrifying in the sense that you don't know what's going on once they enter the environment.The performances are all very good and the direction and shots are all insanelyThis isn't a movie for everyone, it's a hugely thought provoking and terrifying in the sense that you don't know what's going on once they enter the environment.The performances are all very good and the direction and shots are all insanely good. It's a rare film, thats saying the least.… Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
6
TryASummersaultMar 5, 2018
3.1/5 Quite underwhelming other than the visuals honestly, and the epitome of style over substance. Plotting was quite nonsensical and directionless.Some very hollow acting other than Portman and some extremly unnecessary sex flashbacks3.1/5 Quite underwhelming other than the visuals honestly, and the epitome of style over substance. Plotting was quite nonsensical and directionless.Some very hollow acting other than Portman and some extremly unnecessary sex flashbacks injected into the film for nothing but shock value. Tried to be way deeper than it was. The only truly exciting scene was in the house with the mutated bear. Both this film and ex machina had extremely misleading trailers making the appear to be sci/fi horror’s and they were drawn out sci fi dramas that lacked anything remotely worthy of being hailed masterpieces. The whole supposed deeper message and symbolization interpretation that so many of these self proclaimed internet geniuses seem to have is quite funny and pretentious. This was a scattered mess with some really interests visuals which at times had some mediocre cgi.… Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
3
EludiumQ36Jul 14, 2018
Great concept and some of the execution was really good, but much of it was kind of dumb. Take for instance the all female team sent into The Shimmer. That's a bit too much grrl power and ultra-feminist to be plausible. The pace of the filmGreat concept and some of the execution was really good, but much of it was kind of dumb. Take for instance the all female team sent into The Shimmer. That's a bit too much grrl power and ultra-feminist to be plausible. The pace of the film and the wait-till-the-end-for-the-payoff was very similar to "Arrival" which I also didn't like, but wanted to. Look, I'm biased to like these sci-fi films but they keep failing to deliver and that's borne out in its revenue, only $32M domestic and not even released internationally. It also proves that Natalie Portman is NOT a box office draw, but who's surprised by that?!… Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
4
ScienceAdvisorMar 12, 2018
All FX flash, and little substance, wrapped around intellectual ideas that do not adequately tie together. Though the writer/director is hoping you cannot figure that out. It really starts to break down about half-way through when convienceAll FX flash, and little substance, wrapped around intellectual ideas that do not adequately tie together. Though the writer/director is hoping you cannot figure that out. It really starts to break down about half-way through when convience replaces continuity, especially with the environment of the anomaly. This continues the Netflix run of quantity over quality, unfortunately.… Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
7
dangerfarMar 3, 2018
Annihilation is a captivating and slow burning fantasy/sci-fi that manages to overcome its narrative hollowness through a very strong audio-visual presentation, which especially in the last fifth of the film offers a uniquely rivetingAnnihilation is a captivating and slow burning fantasy/sci-fi that manages to overcome its narrative hollowness through a very strong audio-visual presentation, which especially in the last fifth of the film offers a uniquely riveting experience. The first 4/5 of the movie are, though intriguing, fairly ho-hum. Perfectly watchable as the suspense and mystery are well orchestrated, however many of the characterizations, scares, tension, and plot directions are heavily borrowed and often non-sensical from any viewpoint tied to the real world (hence more in the fantasy realm). It leans a bit heavily on flashbacks that don't hold much meaning, save for one which tries to explain a central theme in the story but gets the biology mostly wrong (or if being charitable vastly oversimplified), thus somewhat souring the note. The characters can at times be frustrating as well, taking predictably rash and irrational directions plucked from generic horror or thriller movies that have been recycled over and over. The last 1/5 is what really saved the movie for me though. It doesn't offer a particularly satisfying resolution or anything, indeed if I'm being honest the core plot itself even when brought to bare really is mostly derivative nonsense that merely pretends to offer insight and answers by vaguely making suggestions about dubious things like "refracting DNA" to move things along in a traditional sense. However the audio-visual presentation of the climax is absolutely arresting, and so well done so as to give one an a small taste of a psychedelic experience, a chance to with the right eyes peer into the nature of creation and the self in a way that is difficult to do without the right stiumulation. It drew me in completely during this sequence, so much so that immediately after it returned to normalcy I wanted to go back. It's a rare and precious thing in movies these days, and it was worth the cost of admission alone. Sound editing and design, cinematography and visual presentation, and acting by the ever charismatic and engaging Portman are all top notch. The rest is well executed but fairly forgettable and uninteresting. It is a rare experience that managed to leave me with a positive impression even as it mostly failed to deliver anything meaningful narratively. I will certainly return to those final minutes again on the smaller screen and marvel at their wonder.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
FyilMar 13, 2018
People are too much used to have everything chew up in details to them. Annihilation is a great science fiction that requires you to think and interpret what is going on, is not thet complicated.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
IamTrinaFeb 28, 2018
Pros: Interesting. Different. "Cool." Some pretty scary intense scenes/creatures and weird sounds. Great special effects. Good acting. Memorable. Cons: A little slow at times, but that should be expected for the plot. Got better (faster andPros: Interesting. Different. "Cool." Some pretty scary intense scenes/creatures and weird sounds. Great special effects. Good acting. Memorable. Cons: A little slow at times, but that should be expected for the plot. Got better (faster and more action/drama) in the middle to end of movie. Could have more sound in these slow places. Only a couple things not explained. Maybe these things are in the book. Neither pro nor con: a few gory and bloody scenes (well done)
All in all the mesmerizing parts will stay with me. I would have given it an 8.5, so I rounded up to a 9.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
Davrosdaleks1Mar 2, 2018
I was really surprised by Annihilation. It's a sci-fi/horror/thriller. It's equally weird, intriguing, and unsettling. Basically, what Prometheus should have been.

One of the most visually unique films I've seen. There is so much memorableI was really surprised by Annihilation. It's a sci-fi/horror/thriller. It's equally weird, intriguing, and unsettling. Basically, what Prometheus should have been.

One of the most visually unique films I've seen. There is so much memorable imagery, beautiful, creepy, and sometimes both at once. The whole film has a unique style that I dig. The lightning has a sunsetsey 70's feel to it. Rather than a traditional score, a good portion of the music goes for a folksy style, which actually meshes very well with the swampland the characters are trekking through.

I've heard complaints that the film is too slow. Personally, it went fine with me. I don't think there were any scenes they could've cut. However, some of the dialogue does slow things down sometimes. It's very deliberate and intellectual -ish and doesn't always sound natural. Though this mostly occurs in the opening chapter where all the exposition comes from. (Jennifer Jason Leigh's character is especially a bit of a boring chore to get through in beginning. Can't tell if it's the dialogue, her acting, or a bit of both.)… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
FlexedacornMar 2, 2018
As soon as I saw this movie was being adapted by Alex Garland, I knew it was a must see for me. I loved the slow burn and unique feeling of Ex Machina and was hoping for a similar feel. In anticipation for the movie I picked up the firstAs soon as I saw this movie was being adapted by Alex Garland, I knew it was a must see for me. I loved the slow burn and unique feeling of Ex Machina and was hoping for a similar feel. In anticipation for the movie I picked up the first book of the Southern Reach trilogy to read beforehand. Let me just say, I loved the movie and the book for two different reasons. Both book and film adaptation had amazing visuals that are a must read and/or see. I felt the movie was more action oriented whereas the book was a very ambiguous slow burn thriller. I wouldn’t say the movie was a faithful adaptation, but I found Alex Garlands take on the story to be easier to digest then its source material. There is a particular seen at the end of the movie that will probably go down as one of the top sci-fi scenes of all time. If you are looking for an interesting original sci fi movie, this is your film. Be forewarned if you read the book(s), this movie has a lot of creative differences… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
NeutralMilkHMar 9, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. If you have a problem with some some of the acting and the (initially) mediocre... that's fine, it threw me off too the first time I watched it. However, the second time I watched it with all of my information gathered, a lot of things clicked for me, such as why a certain character says the line, "It's a trick of the light!"

Summary before spoilers: The story's actually good in my opinion, characters are developed (if somewhat underacted and underwritten at points), the visuals are **** amazing, and it actually made me sit and watch the credits for a few minutes... I know it says its underacted and underwritten, but that's only in retrospect after my initial viewing which put me on the edge of my seat. So yeah, it's "almost" a 9/10. Best movie I've seen so far this year, there will probably be a bunch of better ones that come out, but yeah, for now, I love this one.

Also, as a response to Gloukas ridiculous belief that this is the worst movie ever made on a big-budget scale, I've written down a list of a bunch of movies that everyone will agree is worse than this one. -Transformers Franchise
-Beowulf (2007)... it's obscure now for a reason
-Pixels
-Jupiter Ascending
-R.I.P.D.
-The Last Airbender
-Batman and Robin
-Disaster Movie
-The Fifty Shades Franchise
-Charlie's Angels

In terms of Science fiction
-Battlefield Earth
-Jurassic Park 3
-Planet of the Apes (2001, the original is a classic)
-Terminator 5 (which is honestly more confusing that Annihilation since they just stopped giving a **** about the timelines.)

--At this point, I delve into much deeper "spoilers," so if you clicked on this knowing that it contained them, and you actually want to watch the movie, then you should probably turn back from this point.--

My theory, is that this movie is about cancer, or relates to cancer in some way. It's about how cancer effects and changes certain people, especially the scientists, who might all be getting killed by "cancer" except for Natalie Portman... essentially, the ending with the plasma grenade might be chemotherapy, and the reason as to why the shimmer is in her eye and as to why Oscar Isaac is so weird is a sign that the cancer might be coming back... this just so happens to be a movie about cancer that pretends to be one about the unknown (which is revealed to be aliens). Anyway, this is just my theory, and it probably sucks ass, if you want to take this movie literally, the ending could just be that the "fake" Natalie Portman came up with a convincing story (albeit, with a bunch of "I don't knows," and also, she would have to know information about the other characters) or that the "real" Natalie Portman simply came back with a trace from the shimmer.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
CTHReviewsMar 12, 2018
Annihilation is a horror movie in disguise, and one of the creepiest ones I've seen in a while.

The best part of this movie are its concepts. Now, hear me out on this, the execution is done brilliantly, but the ideas and concepts for some ofAnnihilation is a horror movie in disguise, and one of the creepiest ones I've seen in a while.

The best part of this movie are its concepts. Now, hear me out on this, the execution is done brilliantly, but the ideas and concepts for some of the creatures and phenomenons are brilliantly well thought-out, especially when you see this bear-like creature. It honestly scared the sh*t out of me.

It's such a bizarre film with a fantastic mythos behind it.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
7
SonrisasFeb 24, 2018
In a nutshell, an alien meteorite hits earth, thus creating a zone called the Shimmer. When you walk into it, you slowly become part of it. It causes super refraction of light and DNA and so if DNA mixes across species then each speciesIn a nutshell, an alien meteorite hits earth, thus creating a zone called the Shimmer. When you walk into it, you slowly become part of it. It causes super refraction of light and DNA and so if DNA mixes across species then each species picks up part of the other species. Usually people who enter end up dead or turned to dust or something. I would call this a thriller/horror/fantasy/sci-fi genre. I was very engaged even though the move runs 2 hours plus. I love Natalie Portman and Jennifer Jason Leigh and both had big parts in this film. I had no idea how it would turn out. If you usually like Sci-fi/thrillers, I think this is your movie.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
FranbarrmanMar 12, 2018
This film is a mindblowing sci-fi beautifull thing, since it starts you know youre watching something different something unique, natalie is at her very best so are the rest of the crew oscar and jennifer, the sets are amazing, theThis film is a mindblowing sci-fi beautifull thing, since it starts you know youre watching something different something unique, natalie is at her very best so are the rest of the crew oscar and jennifer, the sets are amazing, the cinematography is so colorfull and beautifull and god that endind is a big wow. This one will stick with me for a long time. The only issue are some cgi scenes that looked a bit off but youll forgett this. With only two films Alex Garland is one of muy top ten directors what he has achived with this movie and ExMachina is something i cant describe.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
BradHughesFeb 28, 2018
If you loved Ex Machina, you will love this. Wonderfully acted and thought provoking, it builds towards a riveting and justified climax that manages to provide both a sense of completion and moral/intellectual ambiguity. I wish there could beIf you loved Ex Machina, you will love this. Wonderfully acted and thought provoking, it builds towards a riveting and justified climax that manages to provide both a sense of completion and moral/intellectual ambiguity. I wish there could be a sequel, but despite strong action scenes in the second half of the film, it is not commercial enough for the mainstream audience.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
TheRedSnifit1Mar 6, 2018
A surreal, trippy movie following as they enter a region where reality isn't what it used to be. Visually stunning and well-written. Only downside is that there was maybe a touch too much time spent on flashbacks, especially at theA surreal, trippy movie following as they enter a region where reality isn't what it used to be. Visually stunning and well-written. Only downside is that there was maybe a touch too much time spent on flashbacks, especially at the beginning.

This is one of the best, if not *the* best, "Lovecraftian" (an overused term but it fits this movie well) film out there.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
NShep53Feb 27, 2018
Alex Garland is the man. 28 Days Later, Sunshine, Ex Machina and now ANNIHILATION. Annihilation is his best work so far. The shimmer is a place of horror and true wonder. And so is this film.
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
im_so_metaMar 13, 2018
It's a slower, deeper, more ambiguous film than, for instance, a comic book movie. If this is your cup of tea though, then its brillliant. The visuals are stunning and the narrative was interesting on my first watch, but actually afterIt's a slower, deeper, more ambiguous film than, for instance, a comic book movie. If this is your cup of tea though, then its brillliant. The visuals are stunning and the narrative was interesting on my first watch, but actually after thinking about it, watching a few YouTube analyses (e.g. the AtZ Show) and interviews with the director (Alex Garland), I re-watched it and got so much more out of it; understanding more of the concepts… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
8
bigscreen454Mar 16, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Annihilation on the surface sounds more violent than it actually is but there are some gore moments like when a woman with a lot of feminine angst takes a machine gun and blows away a giant mutant alligator. Let me tell you if you are ever wondering whether Natalie Portman can handle a machine gun I can answer you the affirmative yes and it is quite cool. Make no mistake, it’s an Estrogen pumped film, and with a strong-willed female protagonist that perhaps could win an Oscar as well. Natalie Portman’s performance is outstanding and supporting characters did a good job as well. Some of the characters go psycho but I guess that’s to be expected when you encounter too many flowers and rainbows. This all-lady team sent out to achieve success ‘where no man has gone before’ (and achieved success) didn’t end too well. They go out to the danger zone to solve the mystery and things take a turn for the worse. The five women collectively hit menopause at the same time on a ‘very bad day’, and meet stressors such as a Mutant Aligator and Giant Bear with a skull head. This and many other unfortunate events remind us that Dorothy is not in Kansas anymore. The visuals were outstanding. Complete with rainbow anamorphic flares, this scifi film was a visual treat and something different and more interesting than the most recent scifi films. Natalie’s CG alter ego is taller than her, I get that everyone wants to be taller but this was a bit much, Natalie is a ‘shortie’. The special effects of the alter ego were done well and obviously very high budget. The set design was overwhelmingly cool. Very creative flowers and foliage really added to the environment and feel of the film.

Overall I’d say it’s good storytelling and the film kept my attention which is sometimes difficult to do with adult ADHD onset so early, so 8 out of 10 stars for an engaging film.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
8
The4thBillboardMar 11, 2018
Movie was better than I was expecting. Based on the trailer I thought it would be a little more like a horror movie but this is a good solid SciFi.
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
1
OtjituuoMay 11, 2018
Pretentious garbage. I enjoy the type of movie this was trying to be, Ex Machina as well, but an awful, awful script and terrible acting sank the whole thing. Great visuals and a few interesting ideas, but I was literally laughing at some ofPretentious garbage. I enjoy the type of movie this was trying to be, Ex Machina as well, but an awful, awful script and terrible acting sank the whole thing. Great visuals and a few interesting ideas, but I was literally laughing at some of the clunky dialog rolling out of actors who looked like they were as bored as me. An insult to the genre.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
AndresAlfonsoMar 14, 2018
I love this movie , it takes it time , but once arrives goes directly to you , some scenes are one of the most iconic of scy fy in years .
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
1
AmacfaNov 30, 2020
I’m pretty open minded. I liked ad astra even though it was a bit boring.

This movie, however, I cringed all the way through. It’s like a lifetime movie. Normally I’d recommend even a bad movie for a few good scenes, this movie sucked, II’m pretty open minded. I liked ad astra even though it was a bit boring.

This movie, however, I cringed all the way through. It’s like a lifetime movie. Normally I’d recommend even a bad movie for a few good scenes, this movie sucked, I can’t remember a single scene that was good.


It’s literally a lifetime sci-fi movie. Too much emotion, focus on relationships, cheating. Jesus this is bad. Instead of panning shots on the world and how it changed, they focus on each other relationships and boyfriend issues.

BAD… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
10
MaxkhoMar 22, 2019
Great film that will leave a long-lasting impression on you, and will sure as hell keep you entertained throughout the duration of the film. The direction of this film is mind-boggling, and some of the scenes will genuinely catch you offGreat film that will leave a long-lasting impression on you, and will sure as hell keep you entertained throughout the duration of the film. The direction of this film is mind-boggling, and some of the scenes will genuinely catch you off guard. It will also leave you scratching your head about the ending, message, and how the world of Annihilation works in general. Annihilation is a masterpiece in a very special way, and a must-watch for every Sci-fi fan.

Only grip with the film: the movie uses some pseudoscientific ideas, and the story is somewhat inconsistent. However, that only fills it with even more mystery and adds to the brilliant mysterious vibe that permeates the world of Annihilation.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
0
JLauNov 1, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Sci-fi nonsense about evolution or mutation that doesn't seem to know just how dreadful it is on every level.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
8
mbeckfordOct 27, 2020
It helps to have an open mind and just let yourself go with the flow of the story ... most plot elements align about half-way through the film. Meanwhile just lean back and enjoy the outstanding visual effects, cinematography and soundIt helps to have an open mind and just let yourself go with the flow of the story ... most plot elements align about half-way through the film. Meanwhile just lean back and enjoy the outstanding visual effects, cinematography and sound design. And it has a few very disturbing/creepy scenes that may be tough for some.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
JessTurnerMar 29, 2018
It's not a bad _beginning of a story_, if you ignore the uninteresting 'human interest' element that takes up most of it. And I now see that it is only the adaptation of the first of a trilogy. I'll watch the other two if adapted (which meansIt's not a bad _beginning of a story_, if you ignore the uninteresting 'human interest' element that takes up most of it. And I now see that it is only the adaptation of the first of a trilogy. I'll watch the other two if adapted (which means they probably won't get adapted).… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
CoKronakanMar 20, 2019
This movie was filled with jaw-dropping visuals, directing and cinematography style with amazingly shot scenes, complex mind boggling plot and great acting. It is nothing less of an amazing movie that gives you a lot to think of. TheThis movie was filled with jaw-dropping visuals, directing and cinematography style with amazingly shot scenes, complex mind boggling plot and great acting. It is nothing less of an amazing movie that gives you a lot to think of. The attention to detail in the scenes is amazing. The script however simple it is it has the contents of much more, but it is up to the audience to figure it out. The music in the scenes is amazing and most importantly original and helps the immersion and the action of the characters. Simply put this movie is to complex for everyone to understand, but non the less it is pleasing for the eye, fun to watch and it keeps the tension going through out the movie with new mysteries and threats. Also this film can be entertaining for everyone, even for those who don't get the message of the movie at the end due to it's complex nature. Overall this is an amazing movie that is almost close to a legendary 10/10 if not for it's minor misplaced elements and events that felt pushed in the story, and minor biology plot-wholes.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
LegitSaltFeb 25, 2020
The only way this film doesn’t improve upon the previous entry in Garland’s oeuvre is regarding existentialism – if Ex Machina leaves the viewer questioning theirs and others’ identities, Annihilation leaves the viewer stunned, in surrealistThe only way this film doesn’t improve upon the previous entry in Garland’s oeuvre is regarding existentialism – if Ex Machina leaves the viewer questioning theirs and others’ identities, Annihilation leaves the viewer stunned, in surrealist horror and beauty. Where this film excels is its presentation of the unknown, its worldbuilding. Annihilation presents its characters and audience with an unknown world, a scary world, and despite it being a world of secrets, we are let into it alongside Lena (Natalie Portman). The visuals of the movie are very Lovecraftian and, in all but two or three scenes, they were incredibly well done and surreally real. The characters were well developed and cast. Despite lesser screen time, they all felt true to their scenarios and personalities. Oscar Isaac (Ex Machina) returns in his second Alex Garland film, and, while he plays a smaller role this time, his performance and character are still pivotal to the film’s success. The film develops almost an air of McCarthyism to it, characters come to fear unknown creatures, secrets, entities, and forces. The most stunning element of the film is the cinematography. “The Shimmer” provides some of the most alien and vibrant structures, flora, and fauna. Overall, this film merges some of the best elements of sci-fi, horror, and Lovecraftian fiction to create a truly unique piece.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
PalpetineSheevMar 20, 2020
What a delightfully bizarre nightmare of a film this was. That ending. Man, that ending.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
ClancyBrownNov 19, 2019
Dark and thought provoking. The Screen play is co written by the author of the book in which the movie is loosely based on. The movie inspired me to read the book which is vastly better. Not saying this a bad movie, but the book conveyed muchDark and thought provoking. The Screen play is co written by the author of the book in which the movie is loosely based on. The movie inspired me to read the book which is vastly better. Not saying this a bad movie, but the book conveyed much deeper haunting thoughts and brought my imagination to life with fascinating mental images.The movie well acted with images and soundtrack. That works to make a mysterious atmosphere and story worth watching.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
FilmanwaltDec 17, 2020
[Half the point counts.

(I liked Annihilation a lot better than Birdbox. The whole story about the shimmer was simply more interesting and better presented. The whole cast looks wonderful here and gives the film the necessary depth. The[Half the point counts.

(I liked Annihilation a lot better than Birdbox. The whole story about the shimmer was simply more interesting and better presented.

The whole cast looks wonderful here and gives the film the necessary depth.

The scenario is well staged and you really just want to see more of this world.

The end here is much stronger and also more impressive than the 0815 end from Birdbox. The whole thing makes you think and leaves clearly differentiated scope for interpretation.)

.stnuoc tniop eht flah]… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
AtLeastITriedJul 18, 2020
After watching interstellar I realized how mind bending movies can be. I watched this before interstellar and now that I have seen botb i can confirm. Both are a must-watch. Annihilation had amazing cinematography with a good soundtrack.After watching interstellar I realized how mind bending movies can be. I watched this before interstellar and now that I have seen botb i can confirm. Both are a must-watch. Annihilation had amazing cinematography with a good soundtrack. Great for those whole love sci-fi thrillers.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
Morze232Sep 19, 2020
It was a movie that really made life question, progressing in a slow tone, but it will be worth the end.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
geewahJan 6, 2021
This is a beautifully shot, well executed and captivating sci-fi/thriller movie. Alex Garland is making his mark in this genre.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

79 Critic Reviews

7.1 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL