Annihilation
Paramount Pictures | Release Date: February 23, 2018
7.1
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 990 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
698
Mixed:
170
Negative:
122
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
MrQmackDec 28, 2020
I like how the movie explain the story one by one,and the movie is easy to understand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
2
Gamzguy17Aug 22, 2021
Nothing is remotely scary or destructive in this film entitled "Annihilation". All characters/performances, particularly from lead Natalie Portman, are extremely weak and unnaturally stiff. The choices in sound design and special effectsNothing is remotely scary or destructive in this film entitled "Annihilation". All characters/performances, particularly from lead Natalie Portman, are extremely weak and unnaturally stiff. The choices in sound design and special effects don't do it any favours with creatures that look ripped off from crummy early 3D video games and a villain who speaks in deep wah-wah bass. I'm talking about the frequency, not a voice. It's laughably bad. Finally, to top it all off, the film believes it has succeeded in telling a psychedelic existentialist story, expecting the audience to question about life and the unknown once its credits roll.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
2
CharlieSGFeb 23, 2018
This was just a very sad movie, all around. The trailer was excellent but what they showed there, were the highlights...period! Very much a dead teenager movie, with a little Alien thrown in to keep it even more predictable.
10 of 21 users found this helpful1011
All this user's reviews
2
JudMar 8, 2018
It never ceases to amaze me how film critics are attracted to vapid and tedious films like this one, almost like their careers depend on them, but in self-abusive way. Lame from beginning to end, it attempts to liven things up by dabbling inIt never ceases to amaze me how film critics are attracted to vapid and tedious films like this one, almost like their careers depend on them, but in self-abusive way. Lame from beginning to end, it attempts to liven things up by dabbling in many genres: Horror, Action, Sci-Fi, Suspense, Fantasy, Thriller, Romance, Soap Opera and even Unintended Humor but fails at every attempt.
A cautionary note: if our Defense Department ever attempts to treat annihilation events like this one was, we are in deep trouble.… Expand
8 of 17 users found this helpful89
All this user's reviews
2
SexyMangoMar 12, 2018
To everyone saying the movie is deep. I’m glad you liked it. It felt to me like someone got really impressed by DMT and failed to recreate his experience.
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
3
preciouskikiMar 5, 2018
I must admit, sci-fi is not my thing, so if you are a sci-fi fan, you might enjoy this. As for me, I kept checking my watch. It felt long to me, with stilted dialogue and two many pauses in an already long movie. And I was put off by NatalieI must admit, sci-fi is not my thing, so if you are a sci-fi fan, you might enjoy this. As for me, I kept checking my watch. It felt long to me, with stilted dialogue and two many pauses in an already long movie. And I was put off by Natalie Portman still doing that breathy Jacqueline Kennedy/Marilyn Monroe voice. Although I am a woman and love seeing women get their fair share of action movie roles, I have to say: Why would the expedition team not include any males? In the three rows in front of me, I saw several people fiddling with their cellphones dozens of times, like practically nonstop. Maybe they were bored, too.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
4
GinaKFeb 26, 2018
I thought this movie was very mediocre. There was no chemistry between Natalie Portman and Oscar Isaac, and none between her and the other women in the expedition, all of whom were more interesting as actresses and as characters. TheI thought this movie was very mediocre. There was no chemistry between Natalie Portman and Oscar Isaac, and none between her and the other women in the expedition, all of whom were more interesting as actresses and as characters. The “monsters” were very derivative – I had time to think about all the other movies I had seen that were better (for example, all the Alien movies) and the alien area (or whatever) was not very creative either. I was not bored, but I wasn’t very interested or excited either. A great disappointment after "Ex Machina".… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
7
KeithDowFeb 27, 2018
"Am I you? Are you me?"

These are the pivotal words spoken late in 'Annihilation,' Alex Garland's directorial follow-up to his breakout hit 'Ex Machina.' The film is unequivocally high-concept--perhaps too much for its own good--in a"Am I you? Are you me?"

These are the pivotal words spoken late in 'Annihilation,' Alex Garland's directorial follow-up to his breakout hit 'Ex Machina.'

The film is unequivocally high-concept--perhaps too much for its own good--in a dazzlingly-shot, heady sci-fi thriller. The more one understands biology--specifically cell biology--the more one is able to appreciate how tightly woven the plot is, and how insanely clever and audacious the ending turns out to be.… Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
3
GittoploMar 20, 2018
Sci-fi thriller? Great trailer? Sign me up..

..and then I watched it. I do not remember last time I was this bored. Everything is ridiculous in this film but not in a good way. It tries to be like Predator/Stalker and fails miserably. WeakSci-fi thriller? Great trailer? Sign me up..

..and then I watched it. I do not remember last time I was this bored. Everything is ridiculous in this film but not in a good way. It tries to be like Predator/Stalker and fails miserably. Weak acting, poor plot, extremely tedious watch, scenes seem contrived, no sense of danger, no sense of anything. Bland Central.… Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
1
shermyFeb 26, 2018
I went to see it because of the good ratings. But the acting and dialogue were poor. The story-line lacked a backbone. The movie was filled with two things, Natalie Portman frowning and shooting her AR-15, and second rate CGI. I think thatI went to see it because of the good ratings. But the acting and dialogue were poor. The story-line lacked a backbone. The movie was filled with two things, Natalie Portman frowning and shooting her AR-15, and second rate CGI. I think that the plot was defective because you never could get a clear vision of the adversary. It just seemed like an amalgam of random special effects and strange uninteresting life forms.

They even threw in some generic sex scenes that had just about nothing to do with the plot (and almost nothing to do with sex).

The last time I saw a movie this bad was "Lobster".… Expand
8 of 18 users found this helpful810
All this user's reviews
0
AproxxAug 16, 2018
So. It seems that its enough to put some fantastical visuals here and there, plus an open ending that doesn't make sense but "it is cool" to make some get a little bit confused about the quality of a movie.

This is trash. All the flaws haveSo. It seems that its enough to put some fantastical visuals here and there, plus an open ending that doesn't make sense but "it is cool" to make some get a little bit confused about the quality of a movie.

This is trash. All the flaws have excuses "we are experimenting the events by an unreliable source"

"the aliens aren't good nor bad and don't want anything and aren't anything but a reflection"... except when the movie needed them NOT TO BE that to make the movie more entertaining. If someone question this: "We can't be sure if we can trust the one telling the story (unreliable)".

Nah.

Besides. The movie is just absolutely boring. And the characters half dimensional and BORING.… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
10
AGeekNamedBobFeb 28, 2018
Edited from my blog review. ANNIHILATION is a divisive film. There are many who, once they realize the film isn’t exactly the alien action romp promised from the trailers, will check out early and not allow themselves to be on an originalEdited from my blog review. ANNIHILATION is a divisive film. There are many who, once they realize the film isn’t exactly the alien action romp promised from the trailers, will check out early and not allow themselves to be on an original and thought-provoking journey. There are others who will get on this train, allowing the curiouser and curiouser ideas to start to sink in; but many of them will get off - or be stuck aboard unwillingly- as ANNIHILATION’s train throttled full steam ahead in a pile of weird akin to 2001 taking a ride on Willy Wonka’s Boat Tunnel Hellscape. Or if like me, will station themselves in the Engine car tossing every ounce of coal into the fire screaming MORE MORE MORE.

A careening train isn’t perhaps the best metaphor. ANNIHILATION is a slow burn, much like the novel by Jeff Vandermeer. The first of the three “Southern Reach” books is deeply unsettling, imbued with an unquiet dread as we follow The Biologist and her three teammates sent to explore the aforementioned Area X - an area where biology and evolution has gone haywire. And where-from no one returns the same. I loved it, and immediately ran out to buy the other two books - but felt the story of how Area X alters and maddens the women wouldn’t be very filmmable. Writer-director Alex Garland apparently thought so to. The film for ANNIHILATION is rather different than the source; keeping the very basics but changing just about everything else. But that’s fine. He carries over the tone perfectly, and taking the internal novel and making it visual. It is remarkable; feeling like the previous version but still being entirely it’s own thing.

This matches with the world of Area X. Inside The Shimmer, the film’s name for the purple glow creating the barrier (an example of visual changes in that the book version is invisible), evolution has gone haywire. Mutations of plants and animals live in this new ecosystem. Some gorgeous and harmless; some bone-chillingly terrifying. I don’t write about specifics in my reviews, but there is one sequence was so far the scariest of the year, perhaps of the last several. The sounds. THAT sound. Thus, reconfiguring of the book into the feature fits. Garland builds a more directed narrative, continually sending the crew deeper into Area X, themselves and their madness. Before I move on, those designs are grotesque and beautiful. Is is odd to call gore beautiful? If not, the disturbing beauty of some of the dead is one of the most impressive designs I’ve seen in ages. Gorehounds like me will appreciate several sequences but the disturbing nastiness isn't the focus although it does get a rise. Garland chose well with Director of Photography Rob Hardy. Hardy creates a lush world of evolutionary change and destruction; simultaneously engaging and endangering. As I sat in the theater marveling, I could hear Garland in my ear “Things are going to get weird, I’m going to make it weird.” I thank him for it. Garland has made a career of some of the best sci-fi /horror scripts: SUNSHINE, DREDD, 28 DAYS LATER…, and his directorial debut: EX MACHINA, my favorite film of 2015. Like EX MACHINA, Garland explores many questions, but doesn’t always give solid answers. But he finds the right balance; the audience is left pondering - but in the good way of eagerly waiting to find people to discuss and dissect. Garland trusts his audience to come along without having their hands held. There are many portions of the film, where a less trusting filmmaker would have continued on to inserted a particular shot or some explaining line to bring a concept home. Especially in the bonkers third act, which both brings everything to conclusion and goes full crazygonuts. Garland doesn't play it safe and I applaud him for it. It's too bad many will not, to be left cold by not having it all spoon-fed and wrapped in a bow. I’ve talked concept, but it wouldn’t have worked without a great cast to usher through Area X. The Biologist, played by Natalie Portman is the audience anchor, searching for answers for her husband Oscar Isaac’s reappearance 18 months after venturing into Area X. Like the other 4 women - Jennifer Jason Leigh’s aloof Psychologist, Gina Rodriguez's tough Paramedic, Tessa Thompson’s quiet Physicist, and Tuva Novotny’s Geologist; the Biologist is self-destructing and looking for something to hold on to. Many may say we don’t really get to know these women. I say that is much the point. This isn’t a trained squad; these are individuals there for their own internatal reasons. No one is open to fully bond; but instead to be torn apart and changed by their environment. Annihilation sticks with the audience. An appreciative audience will be as changed and altered as the characters. Garland made a new sci-fi masterpiece in EX MACHINA a; and he has done so again. Audiences will debate and and re-watch. Now if we can only get enough to see it that first time. A… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
10
shuruppakFeb 28, 2018
This film is more challenging than typical sci-fi, superhero offerings -- but well worth it. I'm sure it will be divisive, but for those who prefer cerebral films that don't provide ready-made or easy interpretation, 'Annihilation' will be aThis film is more challenging than typical sci-fi, superhero offerings -- but well worth it. I'm sure it will be divisive, but for those who prefer cerebral films that don't provide ready-made or easy interpretation, 'Annihilation' will be a treat. Gorgeous visuals and great musical/sound track. Doesn't follow the book that closely, but I liked the choices that were made in the screenplay. Well cast. Prefer to see in theater over small-screen.… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
6
whoischarlotteMar 13, 2018
Overall, I thought this was poor, after seeing 5 star reviews of a 'science fiction masterpiece' I expected big things from this film with what seemed to be a solid cast and good direction. But the film was a total headache. 
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
9
CrispyboiMar 26, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is pretty mind boggling in my opinion, so this is just my take on it..I found myself contemplating and discussing this film for hours after with friends and or myself. A movie where existentialism and introspection are both prevalent and well intertwined throughout the entire film. Lena and her team, all women scarred by traumas in their life embark on a search, seeking answers for something greater (the shimmer). However as they delve deeper, each character has their moments of reflective insight in which they realise they need to look inward to find answers or in some cases a route of pure self destruction, which is another theme that it really lends itself to. Specifically when Lena reaches the lighthouse, where she is mirrored identically by this altered version of herself, it is an initial terrifying struggle for both Lena and the viewer, as it really encapsulates the feeling of constriction as when she moves, it moves with her. If she fights it fights back, if she runs it runs. It’s like a beautiful dance of unease and torment, that is until she realised that all she has to do is accept and come to terms with this version of herself, it’s only then when she can escape. This is all showcased through the trippy cinematography and deep colour pallet that engulfs the environment the film is set in. The juxtaposition of breathtaking colour and art, and the dreary undertone of the unknown & the ever-changing refraction of DNA leaves the viewer with a genuine unique and memorable visual journey, regardless of what you can take from the films multi faceted and interpretational meanings (anything goes, really.. I've read theories that this film is just basically an allusion to cancer). Also Let us not forget that this film at its core is reminiscent of a cerebral sci-fi film with a twang of absurdist horror, for example the scene with the bear and it’s roar mixed with the harrowing shrieks of pain from shepherds final moment is utterly disturbing and terrifying. One last thing, can we not forget about the score. Ben Salisbury and Geoff Barrow, bravo my dudes. The pure unease and tension of the build up of abstract, environmental noises with harrowing synths and bellowing surges of sub-bass to keep you planted on your seat. Just brilliant music imo.… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
9
UltimatmovieguyFeb 28, 2018
From writer and director Alex Garland, Annihilation is about a team of researchers who go into this unknown zone that has appeared called ‘The Shimmer’ to investigate what it is, why it’s here, and how it’s growing and changing itsFrom writer and director Alex Garland, Annihilation is about a team of researchers who go into this unknown zone that has appeared called ‘The Shimmer’ to investigate what it is, why it’s here, and how it’s growing and changing its surroundings so rapidly. I was a fan of Garland’s last film he wrote and directed, Ex Machina, for his tightly written dialogue and mesmerizing scene development with great acting and a surprising amount of action as well. His work on that film transfers over beautifully to Annihilation with a substantially bigger budget and a wider variety of acting as well. Even though this script has substantially less dialogue than his last film, each and every line is executed beautifully and the audience feels the impact of every one as well. His direction in this movie is flawless with the proper use of slow motion and the mix of special effects and practical makes it mesmerizing every second the cast is in the shimmer. Like I said the dialogue is practically flawless with it’s variety of characters and unique builds in this film. The twists written come across very well and are fleshed out beautifully with its amazing cast and great direction. Rob Hardy’s work on cinematography is amazing with his offsetting shots and beautifully crafted scenes. With him working on Ex Machina with Garland they have now developed a system that is just pumping out more and more beautiful movies every few years now. Acting wise everyone did a flawless job in this film. Natalie Portman I believe has never done a bad or even a decent performance, when she hits the screen she’s impeccable with every role, every character, every scene, every line of dialogue that she executes in every film she’s in. Jennifer Jason Leigh did an amazing job once again as Dr. Ventress in this film, I grew a very big liking for her from her performance in The Hateful Eight. Even Gina Rodriguez and Tessa Thompson did amazing jobs for their polar-opposite characters in this film. One of the biggest parts of this film is the make p done on the cast and it’s by far the best looking makeup of the year. The scars on characters and tattoos being strategically placed on the characters makes this films story just more and more impactful with every watch. The blood and gore used is beautiful combined with great prosthetics and for gore and creatures as well. Annihilation I believe will be one of the best sleeper movies of the year with it’s highly original sci-fi story and great direction and acting with a flawless blend of CGI and practical effects used. My only complaint has to be a subplot that attempts to flesh out Portman's character a bit more, I felt it’s not necessary and drags the runtime out a little bit too long. Minus that it’s a near perfect sci-fi movie. I have to give this film a 9.25/10… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
9
MaxJadueFeb 27, 2018
With mesmerizing visuals, a chilling score, and strong performances, Alex Garland's book to film adaption "Annihilation" doesn't disappoint. From start to finish, your eyes are glued to the screen and you can't look away from an almostWith mesmerizing visuals, a chilling score, and strong performances, Alex Garland's book to film adaption "Annihilation" doesn't disappoint. From start to finish, your eyes are glued to the screen and you can't look away from an almost masterpiece of a film, leaving the audience with chills down their spines. "Annihilation" is sure to go down as one of the great Sci-Fi films and, no doubt, one of the best films of the year thus far.… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
3
wandering_droneMar 19, 2018
I has so hype for this movie because i read the book that this movie is, SUPPOSEDLY, inspired. I loved the book and i was hoping for a stunnig movie from the directer of the Ex-machina (one of my favoriete movie from 2014). What i get is oneI has so hype for this movie because i read the book that this movie is, SUPPOSEDLY, inspired. I loved the book and i was hoping for a stunnig movie from the directer of the Ex-machina (one of my favoriete movie from 2014). What i get is one visual good movie but with the content of one pseudo-intellectual **** movie. That ending was a **** mess. For the people who didn't read the book (which was completely set aside by Alex Garland), you don't have any idea of a great movie you could have had. The character of the biologist is so great in the book, but in the movie it was a **** cliche of a character. All the structure of the book, and the misteries of the area X are but better that in the movie. I know my opinion is greatly influnced by my apreciacion of the book, but, i assure you, that if most people had read the book the score of this movie was way lower.
ps(sorry for my english)… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
4
NBNEMar 12, 2018
Great premise, falls short. Plot just kind of unravels and doesn't hold together. As mediocre as this is - TONS BETTER THAN BLACK PANTHER!
6 of 14 users found this helpful68
All this user's reviews
3
BooyahMediaMar 10, 2018
Confusing storyline and plot but amazing visual and audio effects, so vivid, bright and beautiful. but absolutely no direction with the first 30 minutes a total waste.
6 of 14 users found this helpful68
All this user's reviews
2
Jes1310Mar 19, 2018
I loved ExMachina, which i tought was surprising, dark and added some new things to the sci-fi genre. This movie tries but never succeeds in the same things. The plot is poor, effects are ok (but nothing more) and the overall impression isI loved ExMachina, which i tought was surprising, dark and added some new things to the sci-fi genre. This movie tries but never succeeds in the same things. The plot is poor, effects are ok (but nothing more) and the overall impression is that this is just garbage. The first 30 minutes are irrelevant and could easyli have been edited out, without and effect on the movie.
Many times they do not follow up on earlier scenes and things just happen for no reason what so ever.
And without spoiling anything…. Are they afraid of sailing….

Netflix really needs to step up. Animated Carbon, Mute, Cloverfield Paradox and Bright have all been really poor movies. And I had some hopes for Annihilation, but this was just as terrible. Using are loosing it Netflix, and please step up asap.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
9
OmarGarciaMar 28, 2018
The film could’ve benefited from a few tweaks here and there but this is the best sci-fi gilm since Arrival.
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
7
Compi24Feb 27, 2018
Like writer/director Alex Garland's last effort, "Ex Machina," "Annihilation" -- for me at least -- is a rich, entertaining, and scientifically thought-provoking ride from beginning to. . .about ten minutes from the end. And though this one'sLike writer/director Alex Garland's last effort, "Ex Machina," "Annihilation" -- for me at least -- is a rich, entertaining, and scientifically thought-provoking ride from beginning to. . .about ten minutes from the end. And though this one's ending is definitely less of a buzzkill, there's still an overall sense of coldness and confusion that I can't seem to shake. So much of the film's first 90% feels so meticulously well thought-out and crafted. Whether its from a visual, thematic, or character-based standpoint, the majority of this movie rings true. It's just the last sliver of the running time that adds so much, yet explains so little, ultimately rendering everything into one of the most frustrating additions to the sci-fi genre I've seen in recent memory.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
Brent_MarchantMar 1, 2018
A mind-blowing, sophisticated sci-fi tale masterfully brought to the screen by director Alex Garland, who has upped his game considerably here, even outstripping the success of his previous work, "Ex Machina." The film's richly layered,A mind-blowing, sophisticated sci-fi tale masterfully brought to the screen by director Alex Garland, who has upped his game considerably here, even outstripping the success of his previous work, "Ex Machina." The film's richly layered, deftly nuanced, insightful script, combined with gorgeous cinematography and an inventive production design, make for riveting viewing. Note, however, that this is not a picture to be watched casually or when one is easily distracted. But an attentive screening is sure to captivate, providing much to think about in terms of metaphysics, spirituality, existence and evolution -- and possibly forever changing one's views on these heady subjects.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
mcq767Feb 26, 2018
This movie is not for everyone but I loved every part of it, and at the very least, everyone should be able to appreciate the art direction and some of the more tense scenes. It's not a movie you should see if you want answers to all yourThis movie is not for everyone but I loved every part of it, and at the very least, everyone should be able to appreciate the art direction and some of the more tense scenes. It's not a movie you should see if you want answers to all your questions. It's a movie you should see if you like thinking about answers to big philosophical questions, told in the context of hard sci-fi.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
8
mace8704Feb 28, 2018
Based on the trailer, I was expecting a very different movie than what I got. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but let's be very clear here. This is an abstract, cerebral, sci-fi film that offers very few concrete answers. To understandBased on the trailer, I was expecting a very different movie than what I got. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but let's be very clear here. This is an abstract, cerebral, sci-fi film that offers very few concrete answers. To understand the film with any degree of depth, I had to go online, and read fan interpretations and explanations and the directors commentary. This film is not self contained, and is highly open to personal interpretation, which some audience members will inevitably find frustrating. I'd recommended going to see in theaters if you're looking for an abstract and contemplative film about human nature. I'd avoid if you're looking for a film that is light, fun, or scary.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
7
GunnerMcDaggetMar 17, 2018
This movie is very much a love/hate affair. On one hand the movie gives you amazing visual effects, an interesting premise, stellar performances by the mainly female cast, and excellent direction... On the other hand we have lazy writing, noThis movie is very much a love/hate affair. On one hand the movie gives you amazing visual effects, an interesting premise, stellar performances by the mainly female cast, and excellent direction... On the other hand we have lazy writing, no commitment to an actual conclusion, and no explanation of what any of it had to do with anything.

TLDR; a great movie let down by terrible writing.

Definitely worth a watch but don't expect much depth from the shallow story line.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
8
CarFan1999Mar 6, 2018
It's an interesting sci-fi film that has a lot of beautiful and sometimes horrifying imagery. More of a slower moving, high-concept sci-fi rather than a strait-up thriller. It's worth seeing.
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
9
TheRussianatorMar 21, 2018
Directed by Alex Garland, this unique sci-fi thriller is filled with top notch performances from Natalie Portman and Jennifer Jason Leigh and an amazing finale
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
tylerkellrFeb 24, 2018
This is an instant cult classic. A movie that only Alex Garland could have made. Will likely remain my top film of 2018. An absolute marvel and a masterpiece. Please go support this movie.
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
8
gazzeberFeb 24, 2018
This was a very interesting and visually stunning film to watch. Based on the book with the same name "Annihilation" does well to show us the world in which this took place and the story to support it. Not sure of director, Alex Garland, willThis was a very interesting and visually stunning film to watch. Based on the book with the same name "Annihilation" does well to show us the world in which this took place and the story to support it. Not sure of director, Alex Garland, will continue with the other 2 books in the trilogy but I am very satisfied with how he put this all together.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
caf2042Mar 1, 2018
Annihilation is directed by Alex Garland, and is based off of a massively successful novel by Jeff VanderMeer. This was one of my most anticipated movies of the year, and having finally seen it, I am blown away. Annihilation is incredible.Annihilation is directed by Alex Garland, and is based off of a massively successful novel by Jeff VanderMeer. This was one of my most anticipated movies of the year, and having finally seen it, I am blown away. Annihilation is incredible. Alex Garland had already knocked it out of the park with Ex Machina, and Annihilation is even better. This is full on 2001 style insanity, and it is glorious. Everything about this movie is so finely crafted and carefully constructed that the finished product is like almost nothing i’ve ever seen. The performances are all exceptional, especially from Natalie Portman. She has a lot of difficult work do, and she handles it with such a resolve. The standout in the film, is how it looks. Alex Garland has crafted a visual wonder. Then comes the end. No spoilers, but the final 20 minutes of the film are so insane, that the only thing I can compare it to is the ending of 2001. This movie also has one of the scariest scenes of the decade so far. Again no spoilers, but the way tension is created is masterful. Honestly, 2018 is gonna have to try really hard to give me a movie that is better than Annihilation.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
8
jldude84Mar 2, 2018
First of all, don't mind the negative Nancy haters bashing this movie. If you enjoy legit sci fi movies, you will not regret watching this. I happen to love creepfest sci fis, and this covers all the bases. It's not even meant to be "scary",First of all, don't mind the negative Nancy haters bashing this movie. If you enjoy legit sci fi movies, you will not regret watching this. I happen to love creepfest sci fis, and this covers all the bases. It's not even meant to be "scary", which is really unique and it's NOT the typical "aliens are coming to annihilate us" as the title suggests. But at the same time, it has one or two LEGIT creepy scenes. Most of all the mutated bear(no spoiler). I couldn't help but be amazed at just how creative this movie is. I can't remember the last time I saw such amazing creativity and imagination.

ONLY thing I didn't care for was the tempo of the film was a bit slow, but I guess that's ok since it's all meant to tell the story.

I would definitely recommend this if you like unique sci fi movies instead of the stupid Cloverfield crap.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
23GMar 3, 2018
A transcendent masterpiece. It is a movie that asks you to keep pace and fill in the blanks, so if you are looking for cheap sci-fi/horror thrills, look else-where. Be ready to give yourself completely to this vision, and the result isA transcendent masterpiece. It is a movie that asks you to keep pace and fill in the blanks, so if you are looking for cheap sci-fi/horror thrills, look else-where. Be ready to give yourself completely to this vision, and the result is something that you will not soon forget. Haven't stopped thinking and talking about it since I left the theater...… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
KalleeMar 5, 2018
Wow. I am in awe of this movie. If you want your brain to get scrambled, to have your view of life as you know it expanded, then this is the movie for you. I highly recommend watching it in the theaters, as it is one of those movies that isWow. I am in awe of this movie. If you want your brain to get scrambled, to have your view of life as you know it expanded, then this is the movie for you. I highly recommend watching it in the theaters, as it is one of those movies that is larger than life.… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
8
oac1982Mar 15, 2018
Far from the usual blockbuster, the film is introspective and heavy with its enervating atmosphere.
Don´t expect jump scares, you´ll find none here (maybe one). Instead, you have a tense plot that leaves you wandering what´s going to happenFar from the usual blockbuster, the film is introspective and heavy with its enervating atmosphere.
Don´t expect jump scares, you´ll find none here (maybe one). Instead, you have a tense plot that leaves you wandering what´s going to happen next (or even what´s going on "right now").… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
Minh18121999Mar 19, 2018
Visually Stunning,Creepy as hell with captivating performances,great twists and unique score.Alex Garland has created one of the most original films that is intense,brutal,emotional weight and i had a blast from start to finish.Definitely theVisually Stunning,Creepy as hell with captivating performances,great twists and unique score.Alex Garland has created one of the most original films that is intense,brutal,emotional weight and i had a blast from start to finish.Definitely the best Sci Fi films since Blade Runner 2049… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
9
Grueny7Mar 6, 2018
This film cannot be summed up or described in a short review. It exists somewhere between an indie horror film and a psychological art project. Clearly made by a director way smarter than myself, I could not begin to understand the nuancesThis film cannot be summed up or described in a short review. It exists somewhere between an indie horror film and a psychological art project. Clearly made by a director way smarter than myself, I could not begin to understand the nuances and meaning behind the gorgeous imagery, nor do I need to in order to appreciate its beauty. The visuals are remarkably stunning for not being a big budgeted blockbuster and the performances are subtly strong. Recommended for the hardcore fans of sci-fi and Indie Cinema rather than those seeking an accessible horror/fantasy experience.… Expand
7 of 17 users found this helpful710
All this user's reviews
8
WiscoJoeFeb 24, 2018
Annihilation is a terrifying journey into the unknown that will be achingly familiar to anyone who has pondered the nature of existence. It's a dazzling chimera combining the DNA of H.P. Lovecraft and Virginia Woolf. Like life itself, theAnnihilation is a terrifying journey into the unknown that will be achingly familiar to anyone who has pondered the nature of existence. It's a dazzling chimera combining the DNA of H.P. Lovecraft and Virginia Woolf. Like life itself, the film is driven by an unsettling mix of beauty and horror, love and loss, desire and fear, exploration and obfuscation. The puzzle may ultimately be missing a few pieces, which is sure to confuse or disappoint some people, but for fans of sophisticated sci-fi and emotional horror this film will be a dark, enthralling oasis in a multiplex full of otherwise dull and phony escapism. Hollywood doesn't often make movies like this anymore, so take advantage while you can.… Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
9
aguila9May 30, 2018
I generally cannot stand Natalie Portman. But this movie is simply stunning. It's not only a great story well told, it's a brilliant story told mesmerizingly well. Visually stunning, devoid of heroic pandering and, yes, Portman has shut me upI generally cannot stand Natalie Portman. But this movie is simply stunning. It's not only a great story well told, it's a brilliant story told mesmerizingly well. Visually stunning, devoid of heroic pandering and, yes, Portman has shut me up on this one. That's second time she does that.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
CineAutoctonoMar 24, 2018
"Annihilation" was a film that despite being heavy to watch, so boring and dark, has a good potential to be a great movie. Natalie Portman achieves another good role in her palmarés of actress, she becomes the center of attention of the film"Annihilation" was a film that despite being heavy to watch, so boring and dark, has a good potential to be a great movie. Natalie Portman achieves another good role in her palmarés of actress, she becomes the center of attention of the film and the key to the construction of the film. The photography is very good and the special effects spectacular. The story is very slow and boring, but very constructive and artistic.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
thedaywalkerMar 19, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I think it's a solid good movie.

It's premise keeps it interesting, with yet another fresh look at what an alien invasion could be. Natalie Portman and Jennifer Jason Leigh were terrific, but other characters failed the get the attention they deserved. Josie (Tessa Thompson) is a great example of this, for most of the movie, seems like she is just there.

The score is beautiful, it just keeps you hooked. They just knew exactly what to give you in every single scene

The ending was so well directed, so well choreographed, the mirror scene between Lena (Natalie Portman) and the Alien was great, and it plays out well in the end where you don't know who exactly got out, the alien or Lena.

Very slow at times even more than needed and some visuals are very unclear, together with the explanation of the mutations and the flowers, maybe if i watch it again i'll understand, but at first i didn't understand 1 thing

I hope Alex Garland keeps making good movies like this… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
zapVMar 17, 2018
Mysterious and sometimes terrifying movie about people facing tragedy and their psychological journey in attempt to overcome it and face the dark, cruel side of nature.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
9
AugustKellerJun 4, 2018
Annihilation is a movie so ambitious and fabricated with such detail, it must be celebrated. From its grand themes to its petrifying atmosphere, Annihilation is an illumination that takes its audience to parts unknown. The literal,Annihilation is a movie so ambitious and fabricated with such detail, it must be celebrated. From its grand themes to its petrifying atmosphere, Annihilation is an illumination that takes its audience to parts unknown. The literal, psychological and spiritual are seamlessly woven together through elite writing, direction and editing. Like a true sci-fi, this film takes its time to carefully build its characters, environment and subtext while submerging its viewers in visuals that won’t soon be forgotten. Some may question moments of overdone acting or unclear writing but, when dealing with a project this purposeful, those complaints can be excused.

Annihilation truly excels because it’s intention is unwavering. The slow pace, dramatic scoring and detailed effects are all geared towards the common cause of immersing its audience into an alien land, making the bizarre familiar. Not only does this create an electric experience but it also contributes to the overall message of the film. In the end, everything comes together so masterfully that Annihilation is indisputably a triumph. From elite shot selection to unforgettable sound, Annihilation is one of the better movies around this year.

Writing: 9/10
Direction: 9/10
Cinematography: 10/10
Acting: 8/10
Editing: 10/10
Sound: 10/10
Score/Soundtrack: 10/10
Production Design: 9/10
Casting: 9/10
Effects: 9/10

Overall Score: 9.2/10

Original Article: https://thefilmguys.blog/reviews/augusts-reviews/annihilation-2018/… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
9
LulzTVJun 20, 2018
This movie was amazing I was left stunned at the first view but at second view its not the same thing. The soundtrack was original and amazing but we can clearly see that Garland is a second time director because he doesnt really know how toThis movie was amazing I was left stunned at the first view but at second view its not the same thing. The soundtrack was original and amazing but we can clearly see that Garland is a second time director because he doesnt really know how to construct a very complicated plot even if he tries. What I really loved was the visual storttelling. This movie doesnt have much dialogue and some images were just eye popping. Another flaw I have with it was Lena's relationship with the black man. It was just there with no reason, it was awkward and it was just popping out in random scenes of the movie which takes it out from a 10/10. Overall I loved this movie because it was ambițios and pretentious. Also I saw someone who gave it a 2 only Because of the soundtrack. Please delete your metacritic account.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
0
jimhillmeyerMar 11, 2018
Terrible movie. Incoherent jumble of absurd, weakly-related incidents trying to hinge on a totally murky attempt at a plotline. Had the feeling a Hollywood techie was fascinated with some 4th of July-like special effects equipment, and theTerrible movie. Incoherent jumble of absurd, weakly-related incidents trying to hinge on a totally murky attempt at a plotline. Had the feeling a Hollywood techie was fascinated with some 4th of July-like special effects equipment, and the writer, director, producers tried to construct a story around the CGI's. The 'ME TOO' group must have like it, because the military-style incursion into the film's Never-Neverland was replicated right from the standard male, testosterone format. Sorry, ladies, it might conceivably work somewhere, sometime, somehow, but not here. Final word: a psychedelic conglomeration of movie trash.… Expand
7 of 18 users found this helpful711
All this user's reviews
4
OlivierPielMar 17, 2018
A mediocre effort to revisit Stalker by Tarkovsky. While the Russian master used Tchernobyl and the possibilities of supernatural phenomena to make us dream and dance around epistemology, the concept of nature and art, Hollywood only knowsA mediocre effort to revisit Stalker by Tarkovsky. While the Russian master used Tchernobyl and the possibilities of supernatural phenomena to make us dream and dance around epistemology, the concept of nature and art, Hollywood only knows the ham-fisted, immature and naïve approach. In one scene, Portman stumbles on a couple of deer/antilopes with flowering antlers (DNA echoes itself to create hybrids or alter egos) in the cliched moment of "this world can be beautiful too, you see"). This is supposed to pass as art despite the fact that many 6 year old have come up with the exact concept with her unicorns. Compare this with the scene of Stalker where the three learned men and the stalker fall asleep near a brook where human artifacts lay submerged under algae; a moment of exquisite melancholy.

Only the end sequence in the lighthouse has a brilliant visual scene. Jennifer Jason Leigh is also excellent, her impatience and taciturn air seem directed as much as the other characters than as to the whole enterprise… Expand
6 of 16 users found this helpful610
All this user's reviews
8
WintxMar 7, 2018
Scifi geek here. Still obsessing over this film. Missing many of the novel's scenes/narrative, yet does embrace the essence. Yes, it could be tweaked (would like even longer 2nd act!). But Jesus, not to hyperbolize too much -- I felt asScifi geek here. Still obsessing over this film. Missing many of the novel's scenes/narrative, yet does embrace the essence. Yes, it could be tweaked (would like even longer 2nd act!). But Jesus, not to hyperbolize too much -- I felt as confused & enlightened as much as I did watching Kubrick's 2001. Although I hear it has director's blessing - hoping for an extended "director's cut" in the future. You may hate it now, but give it 10 years... and don't sit near any popcorn eaters!… Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
7
BeeceeFeb 26, 2018
The film is well-paced, the visuals are very striking, and it does keep up the suspense (although we know that Natalie Portman's character Lena survives, since the story is told through flashbacks). Natalie Portman does an expectedly goodThe film is well-paced, the visuals are very striking, and it does keep up the suspense (although we know that Natalie Portman's character Lena survives, since the story is told through flashbacks). Natalie Portman does an expectedly good acting job, and it is good to see this many women and minorities in a major studio release. On the other hand, Jennifer Jason Leigh generally speaks in a monotone, the multiple flashbacks are sometimes confusing and the film's conclusion isn't completely logical or satisfying.… Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
8
jackmorMar 9, 2018
It was strange but very entertaining. I would watch it again of TV just to see what I might have missed.
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
3
RenovatiaApr 15, 2018
I saw this movie yesterday. The idea - the narrative - is good. The implementation is not. First of all the acting isn't spectacular or anything; Fairly basic. Natalie Portman does an OK job, but Jennifer Jason Leigh is so so.

What you needI saw this movie yesterday. The idea - the narrative - is good. The implementation is not. First of all the acting isn't spectacular or anything; Fairly basic. Natalie Portman does an OK job, but Jennifer Jason Leigh is so so.

What you need to know is that besides the narrative, again which is quite good, it's one of those modern male-unfriendly movies. It's about an alien crash site. Male soldiers were sent first, but they failed their mission. So now they send scientists. All of them women. But what happens next is that they wear militarized outfits and brought military combat rifles with them...

The movie refuses to be smart enough so they could send both scientists and soldiers. No sir, these days men, especially white men are too much for Hollywood. Needless to say the added value of a female-only "science" team with M16's was never shown, but that's how it works these days. In fact, at one point they were surprised one of them could actually wield a rifle (Portman was former Marine).

So the bad is the feminized picture, the often stupid dialogue and the overall bland acting. The good contains some action and a good (but Hollywood style superficial) story with a few nifty interesting details. But not interesting or nifty enough for you to see the movie again. Once is enough and I'm not sure anyone should pay for it.

I wouldn't recommend you to give it a go because of the anti-male undertone. It fits Portman's overly liberal political activism by the way. Also, it doesn't strike me as a main screen movie. It's more like a TV production to me. Besides all of the previously mentioned subjects, you need to know that this movie is a "slow burner". But it's not slow because it's so genius. Despite the interesting narrative, again, it's thinly implemented, so not much is said or done. The movie wanted to compensate with interesting shots instead, but I dispute the level of "interesting", so to speak.

Many slow burners aren't genius at all, despite the pretentiousness. Again, understand that this is a typical Hollywood movie: the main script was probably written in a day. Then a few more details are added or altered throughout the shoot. And that's it.

Too bad. A very good idea with an interesting message ruined by a poor implementation on a wide scale, as well as due to a politicized undertone. You can throw money at it for some special effects (no better than amateur Adobe After-Effects hobbyists on YouTube) and pay money to stars like Portman and Jennifer, but it didn't help.… Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
9
alejandro970Mar 25, 2018
Excels the previous Garland opus -Ex machina- with a sci-fi story that reminds and blends witty The invasion of body snatchers and H. P. Lovecraft The colour out of space. A good choice for a weekend evening.
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
8
TheLaughingTechFeb 24, 2018
Do not go into this movie thinking you going to get something to the likes of "Alien" think more of " The Arrival " slow burn, and when you walk out you keep thinking on it...
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
5
ProfPandemoniumMar 12, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The poor man's version of Arrival with a heavy dose of Hollywood Feminism. A women with an expertise in cell multiplication is enlisted to save her sick husbands life. Upon arrival she and 4 other women are sent into a near suicidal mission to find the underlying cause of an alien invasion on earth. So many holes in the underlying plot including a moment where the party realizes that going to the coast is the easiest way to the lighthouse where the hive of the alien species exists. Which bodes the question why didn't they just start at the coast in the first place?

To many holes in this poor boy.… Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
1
MikefromAngusFeb 27, 2018
One of the WORST science fiction movies I ever seen. The movie is so illogical, it makes a comic book genius compare to this movie. But the comic book movie is fun to watch unlike this movie.
7 of 19 users found this helpful712
All this user's reviews
0
gloukasMar 7, 2018
ok. i will keep it simple. i love complex, confusing movies. loved the directors other movie. this movie however, is probably the worst movie i have ever seen in my entire life. i am not sure where or how any decent ratings are coming from.ok. i will keep it simple. i love complex, confusing movies. loved the directors other movie. this movie however, is probably the worst movie i have ever seen in my entire life. i am not sure where or how any decent ratings are coming from. everyone in the theater also was baffled, confused, laughing at the film (not the funny parts) and disoriented. the film had no purpose, an resolved nothing. it was complete garbage and the ending was so predictable. again, i repeat. this is by far, the worst movie i have ever seen. i cannot think of another movie that was worse than this. i think people feel they "have" to like it, or that it is more complex than it is. to not like it would mean they are stupid. but don't be tricked or lie to yourself. this is the worst movie ever made (on a hollywood/higher budget scale)

terrible and without purpose or resolution..… Expand
8 of 22 users found this helpful814
All this user's reviews
0
AlmostpilotApr 17, 2018
I had not seen such a bad movie in a long time. Horrible idea, script very poorly performed and totally out of reality and yet with a fully predictable end.
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
0
ichemandrewJan 2, 2019
This movie isn't just bad... it is mind-breakingly terrible, with a story even more incomprehensibly stupid that a C-grade made-for-TV from the 80's (but with worse special effects). Save yourself the waste of two hours and watch a 2-starThis movie isn't just bad... it is mind-breakingly terrible, with a story even more incomprehensibly stupid that a C-grade made-for-TV from the 80's (but with worse special effects). Save yourself the waste of two hours and watch a 2-star horror movie on NetFlix. I guarantee you will have a better time. Literally one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my life, and that is coming from someone who has sat through an awful lot of garbage in his time.… Expand
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
2
billb3469Feb 23, 2018
I'm a casual movie goer and not a professional reviewer. Here are some of my thoughts.

Science: Refraction of a wave only alters it's direction through a medium. The idea that DNA would be combined with other surrounding DNA because ofI'm a casual movie goer and not a professional reviewer. Here are some of my thoughts.

Science: Refraction of a wave only alters it's direction through a medium. The idea that DNA would be combined with other surrounding DNA because of Refraction makes no sense. Science Grade F.

Logical Character Actions: The gov't has been trying to figure out the shimmer for 3 years. No one comes out alive. A. Why would the Army send in the wife of a KIA soldier?
B. Why didn't the Army send in a monkey in a cage for 1 second and then pull it out and test it? Then do it for 1 minute? Then 1 hour?
C. Electronic equipment doesn't work in the Shimmer. Ok, why not buy a Polaroid camera on ebay and get a long pole and push it in there and snap a few pictures and pull it out?
D. The expedition couldn't remember what happened the day before. Why not take out a notepad and pen and write down a log?
E. The 4 women that are on the expedition seem like poor choices for this Save the World mission.
F. Why did the Army use those Hi-8 video cameras for recording? If you can record on magnetic tape, you can record on a cell phone and bring a USB charger.
LOGICAL Grade: F

Ok, so let's forget the Sci-Fi and the illogical plot. How were other aspects of the movie?

Script, Direction and Acting: Natalie Portman and Jennifer Jason Leigh were a major reason I went to see the movie. How was it possible to make both monotone, unemotional, and boring? The script left them with boring conversation and thoughts. The director took almost all emotion out of them. Portman's husband was not developed enough for me to care about his character. I didn't know him to start, the gave me more info, but I never was invested in him.

One of the worst things about the movie is the end. After sitting through the entire movie, a little fire destroys the world threatening shimmer problem and saves mankind. That's the pay off that had me stand up and say "I've been fooled by the critics again, shame on me". It had me wondering why the Army hadn't previously shot a Rocket Propelled Grenade into the shimmer or a bomb. How fortunate that a forest fire didn't start and destroy the shimmer.
How fortunate nobody sent in was a smoker or started a camp fire.
The only thing the Army could figure out was to send in people who never came out. Then send in more people and more people. For THREE YEARS.

Script: Grade F.
Direction: Grade F.
Acting: Grade C.

OTHER: Various DNA combinations led to special effects that were very good and interesting.
OTHER grade: B

Overall, I can't say it was a complete waste of time. However, I wish I would have chosen a different movie to see at the theater, eventually seen Annihilation at home and not spent $14 a ticket on it.

The more I think about it, I feel 1 star would be more appropriate than 2 stars. However, I'm not going to think about it.… Expand
13 of 37 users found this helpful1324
All this user's reviews
0
cinewatcherMar 17, 2018
I started to see watch this movie, but stopped halfway towards the end. It was confusing, going back and forth, and took a while to give you the plot. Part of the movie was already done many times before - start with a group of people, andI started to see watch this movie, but stopped halfway towards the end. It was confusing, going back and forth, and took a while to give you the plot. Part of the movie was already done many times before - start with a group of people, and one-by-one they get killed. Why the rest of the soldiers would stay around is beyond me. I'm surprised that so many reviewers gave this movie high number reviews!… Expand
4 of 12 users found this helpful48
All this user's reviews
2
Chriss6277Mar 22, 2018
This is the perfect example of a flashy movie that tries way to hard to prove that is something more and deeper than that. Very predictable and unoriginal.
Appreciated efforts in special effects but not enough to save the movie.
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
8
RoccosRantMar 21, 2018
Great Sci-Fi movie. Keeps you guessing until the end. Visuals are spectacular with creature design that rivals any Hollywood blockbuster out there.
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
6
Voodoo123Mar 13, 2018
+Thought provoking sci-fi plot
+Great cast
+Excellent visual style -Pacing feels a little off I really enjoyed watching annihilation, couldn't help but feel this could've pushed to a 9 or 10/10 movie if the acting was a little tighter with+Thought provoking sci-fi plot
+Great cast
+Excellent visual style
-Pacing feels a little off

I really enjoyed watching annihilation, couldn't help but feel this could've pushed to a 9 or 10/10 movie if the acting was a little tighter with another director... Saying that it totally works and if your'e a sci-fi fan you owe it to yourself to check this gem!… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
5
muldjordMar 12, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie should be called Assimilation, not Annilihation. There's absolutely no annihilation going on.
You'll hear the phrase "I don't know" a lot. Which is seemingly also what the script writers said whenever they asked themselves the question "So, then what happens?".
It's a tedious mess that has no idea what it is or what it's trying to achieve. Ultimately it ends with a whimper leaving basically no questions answered. But then again, I never figured out what the questions were to begin with.

Ugh... Waste of time. Ex Machina was amazing! This movie is just weirdness for weirdness' sake.… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
6
TrevorsViewMar 8, 2018
As it starts, Lena, a biologist, sits in a glassy room, questioned by a scientist in protection equipment who stands over her. She says she has no recollection on whatever just happened, compelling the viewer to remember events as she does.As it starts, Lena, a biologist, sits in a glassy room, questioned by a scientist in protection equipment who stands over her. She says she has no recollection on whatever just happened, compelling the viewer to remember events as she does. After photos in Lena’s sepia-tinted home illustrate her husband’s army life, he returns, devoid of previous recollection himself as to how he returned. Outside her own awareness, a comet strikes a lighthouse, warps its sense of shape or texture, then sets off an expanding rainbow bubble, its shimmery wall set to mutate cell reproduction.

Paralleling scene number one, Lena questioning her husband’s activity in war reverses her interrogation; she stands over him slumped in his seat. Once seated across each other at the table, held hands reflected backwards behind a water glass, his blood appears in said glass, the first sign of his multiple organ failure. Any focus on their eyes throughout this crisis implements whenever they witness obliteration, up until the last frame addresses all you need to know and all you wish to know.

I love underseen independent films like Annihilation, those following nontraditional narrative conventions to take creative liberties in discussing the inner human condition. Alex Garland already perfectly accomplished his breakout art-house feature Ex Machina, so now he brings out another visual delight in his second project, thus far the only movie of 2018 I’ve anticipated the release of!

Garland conveys his actors’ own bent genes, each performance almost appearing alien in a series unevenly blank appearances. Of the talented cast members, Oscar Isaac (Ex Machina, Inside Llewyn Davis) happily sells it best as Lena’s husband. His illness deflects his voice to transparently reveal the sad lack of identity in his eyes: a slow, troubled, very real war veteran. It’s easy to see why Garland works well off Mr. Isaac!

Besides Garland’s attentive direction, the work by production designer Mark Digby (Ex Machina, Slumdog Millionaire) symbolically suggests a DNA strand’s deconstruction and reconstruction. You always seem boxed inside a different world larger than life in the Shimmer’s chaotic colors chosen to suggest self-destruction in a stark contrast against Lena’s boxy interrogation room. Inside the void grows beautiful yet strange flowers living together on a single branch, despite being of diverse species, alongside some technicolor moss and man-shaped bushes. These outlandish mutations hold beauty, although plenty of gruesome, supernatural appearances never shy away from any bodily imagery in its graphic detail that catches you off guard.

But honestly, Alex Garland has got room for improvement, particularly in helping the typical viewer care about the story. The on-the-nose dialogue said by such cold characters also tosses out more expositional information than the average viewer could handle, especially in the first act, all writing the names in the script out to model figures of altered chromosomes rather than well-fleshed out people.

This excess of information attempts to counteract the lack of sincere emotion with a cliché catalyst of Lena’s husband leaving her alone, a plot device done rather weakly compared to other similar scripts. Further validating the cliché, Lena cheats on her husband, in turn making her less sympathetic—would you root for some unfaithful whore? I sure wouldn’t! Especially since Lena expresses few tangible opinions about her team of four other women in their mission through the Shimmer, older viewers might not embrace something as absurd as this journey into the unknown.

However, Annihilation still meets the expectations of art cinema lovers in Alex Garland’s near-horror approach. In each disorienting time narrative beneath the Shimmer, suspense eliminates clear signs of what happens next. Soon, after several attacks by a creature shrouded in darkness, a horrific faceless bear’s roar mixed with a woman’s screams leaves both everything and nothing to the imagination. These are not the types of images you’re able to forget easily, regardless of whether you want it to.

With these brave woman leaders who willingly face up to such horrors previously unimagined, they warn us all, of our eventual end as we watch their individual paths to insanity inside the Shimmer. Likewise, this alternate future’s continental board steers clear of personal demolition, suggesting that the damaged male leaders in the United States wrongly believe women are the true unidentifiable Extra-Terrestrials in the foreign land that is masculine privilege. Considering Hollywood’s confused gender equality nonsense, it deserves some compliments when a motion picture like this one empowers women without devaluing men; they remind us that if equal treatment to both sides is achieved, we have no need to fear an annihilation.… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
4
amheretojudgeMar 13, 2018
did it communicate with you..

Annihilation The far fetched idea is not only visible miles away before its station but even the priorities seem to fade off quite early before the scrutiny even begins. A smart adaptation with strict editingdid it communicate with you..

Annihilation

The far fetched idea is not only visible miles away before its station but even the priorities seem to fade off quite early before the scrutiny even begins. A smart adaptation with strict editing on writing section by Alex Garland is possibly the only reason why someone might survive this feature. But unfortunately as much as to-the-point and gripping the screenplay is, the execution lacks better editing as it chews on this slow pill for almost an extra half an hour (the runtime could have easily been of 90 minutes). Natalie Portman is devastatingly good and there is no flinching on that and on her supporting side Oscar Issac justifies its presence on the screen. Even though the genre depicts horror; which is on a head-scratching level (the "help me" cries will be enough for your nightmares) where even the elders might cringe on the seat, there are some genuinely good visuals that brightens the tone a bit. Annihilation is without a doubt no short on execution (Alex Garland hits perfect mark on executing the paper on screen) then whether it is to project a heart breaking action sequences or horror chills or even creative creatures but what it fails is on offering a newer perspective, better plotline and a good old tale.… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
9
gamedevilbeeApr 11, 2018
สิ่งที่ข้าชอบในหนังคือ...
- การแสดงของแม่นางนาตาลี แม่นางไม่เคยทำให้ข้าผิดหวังเลย ข้าภูมิใจในตัวเจ้ามาก ข้าไม่เสียแรงที่ติดตามเจ้าตั้งแต่ ราชินีหงส์ดำเลยนะขอรับ
- งานภาพและชีจีมันช่างตระการตาพิศวงยิ่งนัก -สิ่งที่ข้าชอบในหนังคือ...
- การแสดงของแม่นางนาตาลี แม่นางไม่เคยทำให้ข้าผิดหวังเลย ข้าภูมิใจในตัวเจ้ามาก ข้าไม่เสียแรงที่ติดตามเจ้าตั้งแต่ ราชินีหงส์ดำเลยนะขอรับ
- งานภาพและชีจีมันช่างตระการตาพิศวงยิ่งนัก - ในด้านเนื้อเรื่องมันช่างล้ำจนต้องกลับไปคิดตาม คนทั่วไปไม่ชอบก็ไม่แปลก เพราะมันล้ำยิ่งนัก
- ส่วนด้านเพลงประกอบของออเจ้า Ben Salisbury และ Geoff Barrow มันช่างไพเราะและตราตรึงยิ่งนัก มันลึกลับน่าค้นหา
- ส่วนชีนระทึกก็มีน้อยแต่น่าจดจำ สยองติดตาข้ามาก
สัตว์ประหลาดก็ช่างพึลึกชะจริง
- องค์ท้ายของเรื่องก็ทำให้สมองข่้าตายไปชั่วขณะเลยขอรับ
ข้อเสีย....
- การเดินเรื่องอาจจะช้าชีนระทึกไม่เยอะมาก และมันน่าจะทำให้ระทึกกว่านี้

สรุป
หนังเรื่องนี้เป็นอีกเรื่องที่ทำให้ข้าเปลี่ยนความคิดกับผู้มาเยือน ที่ไม่ใช่มาเพื่อครองโลก แต่มันมาเพื่อเปลี่ยนบ้างอย่าง
ถ้าออเจ้าอยากรู้และชอบหนังแนวระทึกวิทยาศาสตร์ลึกล้ำลับ ห้ามพลาดเลยนะขอรับ… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
10
norseJun 27, 2018
Oh wow - I had heard not so great things about the movie and was blown away how extremely well it dealt with a difficult subject matter. The visuals are outstanding but I didn't much care for the score. Actors are top notch throughout and theOh wow - I had heard not so great things about the movie and was blown away how extremely well it dealt with a difficult subject matter. The visuals are outstanding but I didn't much care for the score. Actors are top notch throughout and the story is something entirely new. Congrats to the team and director, extremely worthwhile movie.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
3
ErimudDec 7, 2018
Plot holes, poor script, painfully stupid character decisions. I can't think of anything positive to say about this film. I guess the cinematography is good in some sections..
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
1
sy19890515Nov 18, 2019
So, the shimmer refracted everything, that could explain the facts about radio waves and signals, but how does it explain the compass? sure if you say that the magnetic forces are refracted as well, but why didn't it refract gravitationalSo, the shimmer refracted everything, that could explain the facts about radio waves and signals, but how does it explain the compass? sure if you say that the magnetic forces are refracted as well, but why didn't it refract gravitational force and Van der Waals force? why are they still standing on the ground? why is everything still keeping togethre instead of shattering into molecules?… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
PanchogulJul 24, 2020
Me gustó mucho el apartado visual y los efectos especiales, las actuaciones estuvieron buenas pero tampoco magníficas, pese a que se disfruta viéndola, la historia en sí se siente un poco floja. Entretenida, más no excepcional.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
MothmannJun 10, 2019
This is John Carpenter's "The Thing" in essence, in concept, story and some set pieces. Nobody really minds reinvention except when it has been done as poorly as this has. Very slow paced it was quite a drag with very little drama and takingThis is John Carpenter's "The Thing" in essence, in concept, story and some set pieces. Nobody really minds reinvention except when it has been done as poorly as this has. Very slow paced it was quite a drag with very little drama and taking much too long to get going. I give extra points for Portman's convincing performance excellent sound and for the delightful visual spectacle the movie was, and that's about all.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
jimulkaMar 11, 2018
A big fat -0- for this mess of a movie. SEE 'Critic Reviews', Rex Reed's (New York Observer) review. That is precisely my review.
5 of 16 users found this helpful511
All this user's reviews
1
Qgal5kapMar 14, 2018
This was pretty bad... It's quite boring, so you'd better have something else to do while watching. Like sorting nuts and bolts, or wrapping coils for your e-cig.
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
2
geodeoMar 14, 2018
Terrible film - watching a all female cast is as interesting as watching an all male cast (sarcasm). Film has no real build up of suspense, characters that are stereotype and where the acting is obvious and the only interesting component isTerrible film - watching a all female cast is as interesting as watching an all male cast (sarcasm). Film has no real build up of suspense, characters that are stereotype and where the acting is obvious and the only interesting component is rushed in the last 10 minutes rather than exploring the topic in depth. For such a nihilistic title - the reasoning behind the visit seems more plausible, realistic and less menacing than the spectacular headline.

A fail unless quotas for all female cheesy sci fi is important to your viewing pleasure.… Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
0
zaksommerfieldMar 18, 2018
This film is a plotless mess that takes some of the weirdness from the book but removes literally all of the story. More an impressionist painting then a film. Skip it.
5 of 17 users found this helpful512
All this user's reviews
2
raporgiMar 13, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Its Alien and then some through the eyes of hack derivative director Alex Garland. Its boring and unentertaining. Garland pads out this crapbird with all sorts pointless musings. Portman gets blacked and via guilty conscience follows in the footsteps of her husband. Syfy channel level effects and not enough interesting goings on. Predictably the women turn on each other at various points in the movie only to get slaughtered.Dont waste your time its not even funny.… Expand
4 of 14 users found this helpful410
All this user's reviews
7
Meth-dudeFeb 23, 2018
Although the dialogue was most of the time very cliché, the characters were stereotypical and the movie was predictable, it was still surprisingly enjoyable. The acting was quite good, the CGI effects weren't that bad and the movie wasAlthough the dialogue was most of the time very cliché, the characters were stereotypical and the movie was predictable, it was still surprisingly enjoyable. The acting was quite good, the CGI effects weren't that bad and the movie was entertaining. Sure, the movie had it's problems, but it's still a more than decent sci-fi movie.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
3
cas514Mar 16, 2018
good set up, good horror'sci-fi ideas, bad execution...Terrible casting with Natalie Portman, Im suppose to believe she spent 7 years in the army yet she looks like she can barely handle a sandwich. Yeah no.. The rest of the cast was wastedgood set up, good horror'sci-fi ideas, bad execution...Terrible casting with Natalie Portman, Im suppose to believe she spent 7 years in the army yet she looks like she can barely handle a sandwich. Yeah no.. The rest of the cast was wasted and not given enough to do. Should of casted someone that atleast looks like they can hold a machine gun.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
5
joshwallFeb 26, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Pure silliness. The premise is great but the movie lands quite far from the book. Ridiculous end with a man in what looks like a rubber suit miming with Natalie Portman.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
1
DragonSEGMar 15, 2018
Far too slow of a story. I thought it would pick up when they entered the shimmer, but I was wrong. There were a few parts that made me think that maybe it would become worth it. Those parts, sadly, were few. I guess I think that if itFar too slow of a story. I thought it would pick up when they entered the shimmer, but I was wrong. There were a few parts that made me think that maybe it would become worth it. Those parts, sadly, were few. I guess I think that if it has 'Action' as a listed genre, it should have, well... action. This felt like a college lecture when the professor is half asleep.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
3
drippelFeb 27, 2018
Turned a very good book into a anti-male, multi-culti political statement. Good visuals but ultimately, extremely disappointing.
4 of 15 users found this helpful411
All this user's reviews
2
ManutddabestFeb 28, 2018
Why is an Oscar winner acting in this heap of thrash. Cheap effects and lousy storyline. For real sci fi, watch Underworld. I support Man Utd!
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
9
thefressMar 20, 2018
I cannot stress enough the importance of repeated viewing of this movie. It’s not that it’s the most genius piece of film ever caught on camera, but it is intentionally packed with details that go unnoticed upon one’s first watch, detailsI cannot stress enough the importance of repeated viewing of this movie. It’s not that it’s the most genius piece of film ever caught on camera, but it is intentionally packed with details that go unnoticed upon one’s first watch, details that emphasize the movie’s themes and help develop the main players featured throughout. In a way, the story isn’t dissimilar to that of Garland’s directorial debut, „Ex Machina“. In E.M., one is presented with a moral dilemma of sorts: does the viewer root for the human or the machine, both of which gain one’s sympathy but have very different agendas? „Annihilation“ plays out similarly, only in a much different way and on a grander scale. I’m not going to go into any specific details here, but after three viewings, I can safely say that this is one of my favorite movies to be released in years. Anchored by a typically strong performance by Natalie Portman, whose complex character work ranks among some of her best work in years, a brilliantly understated score by Portishead/ Invada Records mastermind Geoff Barrow and Ben Salisbury, as well as gorgeous visuals and cinematography, „Annihilation“ is a head scratcher that keeps you coming back for more - and not necessarily out of a desire to understand the mysteries surrounding Area X and the shimmer; it’s a story of death (both physically and metaphorically) and the budding of new life under the most extreme of circumstances. It gives as much as it takes. Easy 9/10.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
5
TheBlurbMar 1, 2018
Alex Garland's adaptation of Annihilation is ambiguous at best. The film is loosely based off of Jeff VanderMeer's best selling 'Southern Reach' trilogy. The plot of the film follows the basic outline of around four experts entering theAlex Garland's adaptation of Annihilation is ambiguous at best. The film is loosely based off of Jeff VanderMeer's best selling 'Southern Reach' trilogy. The plot of the film follows the basic outline of around four experts entering the Shimmer to investigate the root cause. Natalie Portman plays the film's lead Lena, with Jennifer Jason Leigh as the psychologist, Tessa Thompson, Gina Rodriguez, and Tuva Novotny.

The film is told in the perspectives of flashbacks and real time. This makes the viewer easily lose interest in the story if it it doesn't have some sort of consistent thread running through. One of the effects of being in The Shimmer is that you develop a form of dementia. After crossing over, the team awoke with no memory of what happened but deduced through food rations they had been inside for at least three days.

This would have been a very interesting perspective of story telling, however the time jump between the flashbacks, Lena's interrogation, and time spent in the Shimmer is so large that you can never fully get invested. The best parts of the films were when they were inside The Shimmer.

The set director created a world much like that of The Last Of Us with a seemingly constant growth of fungi. It's sort of explained that the rate of evolution moves much faster in this zone and therefore animals and plants take on an other-worldly appearance. Again, just as you are beginning to really get into these moments you are ripped out by a flash back or the interrogation.

On top of this, any time you begin to get a hint of an explanation as to what is going on you are pulled to a totally different scene. It get's more frustrating as the movie goes on because things just stop making sense. This makes it sound like one of those movies that you have to be an intellectual to understand, but it just doesn't make sense. It's almost like Alex Garland took the main parts of the book he liked and then tried to put them together with not much in between.

If you want to make an intriguing sci-fi movie, all the dots need to connect at the end. A lot of the scenes seemed either out of context or just very badly timed, moments that seemed shocking or intriguing were dropped or instantly switched gears. With all of this being said the movie isn't completely terrible.

In fact, the five characters we follow are portrayed very well by the respective actors. Each character had a slightly obscured past, after all this 'suicide mission' is volunteer, that you wanted to know more about. Unfortunately the film didn't offer much character growth for any of them, including the lead.

All things considered this probably wouldn't be your best choice for a movie date, but if you really wanna see it give it a shot. For this writer, the movie wasn't very intriguing as a whole and did many things that reminded me of other sic-fi's I would rather have watched. I understand what the director was going for but in all honesty, I don't feel it was achieved.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
5
JoeCoolApr 15, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film has some really nice visuals. Nothing like Valerian of course but nicely done for the budget. More women scientist trying to save the day nonsense. Having it take 3 years for the military to succeed at anything that could be perceived as life-threatening is an insulting bad joke. It's all metaphores for self-destruction and cancer and what not. I'm really not into metaphores for the sake of metaphores. No hazmat suits to go into the shimmer, absurdly long timeperiods pass but the batteries on the camera last a whole year. Too many things just don't make any sense.
The idea was interesting, I'd guess they could have come up with something better if they'd had a bigger budget, but it's pretty flawed to me storywise. Nice visuals so not a complete waste of time, but otherwise pretty meh.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
silveradoMay 22, 2018
Masterpiece scifi thriller about the question wheater our personality is a part of our body or trancendent and migrational. Beautiful nature scenery, great acting by Natalie Portman and a story that goes full circle.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
MorganOlsonApr 3, 2018
Annihilation is a bold, brave, and “intellectual” film. Intellectual in the sense that if want your films to have clean, straightforward answers, this will not be your movie. The film confidently asks significant, cosmic questions aboutAnnihilation is a bold, brave, and “intellectual” film. Intellectual in the sense that if want your films to have clean, straightforward answers, this will not be your movie. The film confidently asks significant, cosmic questions about identity, creation, and destruction. Annihilation is an existentialist’s wet dream, a prosthetic fanatics’ next obsession, and a horror fan’s unexpected surprise. Natalie Portman gives a grounded performance as Lena, a biologist empowered by her grief and the film’s center star. Oscar Isaac (Kane) is sublime as always, delivering some particularly impactful lines with nuance and mysterious grace. The supporting cast is solid, though unfortunately Jennifer Jason Leigh (Dr. Ventress), Tessa Thompson (Josie Radek), and Tuva Novotny (Cass Sheppard) aren’t given much room for character growth. Gina Rodriguez (Anya Thorensen) gets the most time of the background cast and gives a convincingly twisted, hysterical performance that briefly falters on the merging of deniability and believability. On the subject of faltering, the film briefly stumbles with callbacks to an unnecessary side-plot. While people flocked to Ex Machina (2014), Alex Garland’s previous work, for the characters, one should go to Annihilation for the visuals. This is a gorgeous movie, with wide shots, saturated colors, and imaginative creations (there’s a particularly frightening and haunting animal scene; be warned). Ben Salisbury’s and Geoff Barrow’s score supplements the film perfectly, with acoustic guitars and orchestral pieces moving in and out of an ethereal mix of heavy synth by the final act. Annihilation deserves praise for its ambition alone. Garland’s a stunning, female-led, hard sci-fi movie to in this modern age is a wonder to behold and a joy to watch.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
OddomaticApr 11, 2018
Annihilation is a dark, beautiful, and thoughtfully made film. It's conceptually rich and well-acted, with stellar performances delivered by the entirety of the cast, particularly the team of five that the movie focuses on; they all fit theirAnnihilation is a dark, beautiful, and thoughtfully made film. It's conceptually rich and well-acted, with stellar performances delivered by the entirety of the cast, particularly the team of five that the movie focuses on; they all fit their roles quite well. Some might say it's too slow, or the plot's too simple, or accuse the characters of being shallow, but I would argue the contrary. Sometimes a lot can be communicated with fewer words; the lead characters' pasts are implied through concise and fitting dialogue, the pace careful and contemplative, and the plot as complex as it needs to be. The true strength of Annihilation is in the visual and audio experience it provides. Like in the detailed forest park set pieces, unnaturally overgrown with vibrant, almost otherworldly flora. The stillness, the quietness, always humming with the subtle movement of bizarre wildlife. The woods, as beautiful as they are dangerous, won't hesitate to plunge you into an atmosphere of fear and unease. This film contains truly effective horror, the kind that gets a real reaction from me. It had me shifting in my seat, unable to rip my eyes away from the unsettling imagery before me. It's not just frightening, but thought-provoking, giving enough hints for you to get a grasp on what you need to know, but not so much that there is no uncertainty or tension left. Easily one of my new favorite films.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
ricouda59Mar 14, 2018
awesoooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmme
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
fantasticasm89May 6, 2018
Annihilation speaks, and I would only muddle the crystalline clarity in a retelling. Brilliant performances and gorgeous effects coalesce a fluid, telling, terrifying conclusion. In many ways, this film is a test of heart, demanding weAnnihilation speaks, and I would only muddle the crystalline clarity in a retelling. Brilliant performances and gorgeous effects coalesce a fluid, telling, terrifying conclusion. In many ways, this film is a test of heart, demanding we orient ourselves against the universe, certain to be devoured. Deliberate, economic, and visionary, the volatile alien world excites and terrifies on the surface. That’s just the beginning.

I went to post the picture for this review, and I realized that this movie left me so speechless that I almost forgot to mention: the characters are all women scientists. Furthermore, this film takes leave from the typical plot tropes that you would expect to emerge from its premise: people, leaders, the government are all innocent. The dystopia in this film isn’t human-made - it’s all-natural, and this leads to the film’s finest philosophical point: in nature’s eyes, we’re the aberration.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
1
WaffenherrmuffNov 15, 2018
Garbage. This is not sci-fi. It is sci-fi like Star Trek is sci-fi i.e it is pure garbage fantasy. Though at least Start Trek has a plot and characters. I do not understand how anyone can think this is an intelligent movie and I amGarbage. This is not sci-fi. It is sci-fi like Star Trek is sci-fi i.e it is pure garbage fantasy. Though at least Start Trek has a plot and characters. I do not understand how anyone can think this is an intelligent movie and I am shocked and horrified I believed the reviews. Outsides of the fact I can hopefully save others from watching this steaming pile of manure. Intelligence implies learning, and there is nothing to learn here. It is one dimensional tripe.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
nuwaveFeb 25, 2018
Bad movie. Long boring. Very little action. Acting is fair at best. Don't waste your $$$$
7 of 29 users found this helpful722
All this user's reviews
9
HealingToolboxAug 25, 2018
More Arrival, director's last film, than Star Wars. As noted by many critics an unusual blending, heightening of the genre monster movie and and exploration into our own unconscious. I think better than Arrival as the third act pays offMore Arrival, director's last film, than Star Wars. As noted by many critics an unusual blending, heightening of the genre monster movie and and exploration into our own unconscious. I think better than Arrival as the third act pays off better than the first two strong acts of Arrival. A story for writers and explorers, not action junkies.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
8
MaxPayneIsGodMar 18, 2018
An intriguing, thought provoking Sci-Fi thriller guaranteed to keep you thinking after the final scene. An unsettling and (almost) original concept with some genuine shocks and a good dose of horror. The casting was a bit questionable, notAn intriguing, thought provoking Sci-Fi thriller guaranteed to keep you thinking after the final scene. An unsettling and (almost) original concept with some genuine shocks and a good dose of horror. The casting was a bit questionable, not Miss Portman's best work, Jennifer Jason-Leigh was a miscast based on talent alone, and Oscar Issac was underused (again) I really enjoyed it, but a sequel is unnecessary.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
8
WhiskeyStoriesMar 23, 2018
Annihilation is a film of beautiful contradictions. It's the most boring and most fascinating film I've seen in 2018 so far. The first half is dry as all hell (kind of a chore to get through), but the second half truly makes up for it in itsAnnihilation is a film of beautiful contradictions. It's the most boring and most fascinating film I've seen in 2018 so far. The first half is dry as all hell (kind of a chore to get through), but the second half truly makes up for it in its underlying themes, tension and creativity in f#cked-upness (the bear scene is absoluetly terrifying). The symbolisms are left to your own interpretation, yet some of the clues are extremely on the nose; the writing is sloppy, but genius at the same time etc. - the list goes on and on, but the most important aspect of it is that it leaves a really strong impression. This film will be remembered for years to come that's for sure. Annihilation is not perfect, but it is a damn good piece of hard sci-fi.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
10
akenaton1984Apr 15, 2018
Una mezcla de Lovecraft y Stalker. Una gran obra, indiscutible. No sólo se trata de la auto-destrucción del planeta sino de un análisis de los diversos niveles de auto-destrucción humana. Quizás, sí, algunos efectos pudieron ser mejores; peroUna mezcla de Lovecraft y Stalker. Una gran obra, indiscutible. No sólo se trata de la auto-destrucción del planeta sino de un análisis de los diversos niveles de auto-destrucción humana. Quizás, sí, algunos efectos pudieron ser mejores; pero eso no le resta nada al planteamiento original.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
1
RudygerDec 11, 2018
I hate this kind of movie. Everything is so artsy and pretentious. The plot is pushed back, far behind ultra-feminism, SJW agenda, and gibberish philosophy. It's the kind of movie people don't admit they don't like, because otherwise theyI hate this kind of movie. Everything is so artsy and pretentious. The plot is pushed back, far behind ultra-feminism, SJW agenda, and gibberish philosophy. It's the kind of movie people don't admit they don't like, because otherwise they will be judged for not understanding EVERY metaphore in it. First, a movie should tell a story. Then, only then you can infuse discrete political or philosophical messages. Not the opposite, it only makes a boring, pretentious film… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
7
drlowdonApr 7, 2018
A sci-fi horror film based on the novel of the same name “Annilhilation” follows a group of military scientists who enter "The Shimmer", a mysterious quarantined zone full of mutating landscapes and creatures.

Annihilation has a veryA sci-fi horror film based on the novel of the same name “Annilhilation” follows a group of military scientists who enter "The Shimmer", a mysterious quarantined zone full of mutating landscapes and creatures.

Annihilation has a very interesting central concept and features a host of excellent scenes, one in particular is so creepy it’ll haunt me for the rest of my days, but overall it doesn’t quite all come together in a completely satisfactory way.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
ViolettJul 15, 2018
Pretty nice if you ask me. I like this kind of "Stalker"-movies, games or books. But while idea is great, this movie looks so ... unreal? I cant believe in Lena-Isaac story, I cant believe nervous girls were successful where soldiers failed,Pretty nice if you ask me. I like this kind of "Stalker"-movies, games or books. But while idea is great, this movie looks so ... unreal? I cant believe in Lena-Isaac story, I cant believe nervous girls were successful where soldiers failed, I cant believe they just walked without any special equipment (at least they had one binoculars with night vision). One of my favorite books is Roadside Picnic - about alien Zone on Earth - in this book everything looks so real, even if it just a book, there are no plot holes, compared to Annihilation. Still, if you like such kind of genre I can recommend to watch this - once.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

79 Critic Reviews

7.1 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 71 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL