Read Mixed User Reviews for All the Money in the World

4

MercurioJan 6, 2018

I'm not sure how they managed to pull it off, but they turned what should have been a highly charged kidnapping caper into a big snooze. It might be because the only likeable character (the kidnapped teen) doesn't do much in the film.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

ledaumasDec 31, 2017

The only reason to watch this movie is for the performances of Michelle Williams and the last-minute replacement of Christopher Plummer. However...there was so much more that this story could have been about. The plot line is simple. MiserlyThe only reason to watch this movie is for the performances of Michelle Williams and the last-minute replacement of Christopher Plummer. However...there was so much more that this story could have been about. The plot line is simple. Miserly grandfather won't pay the ransom until his grandson gets an ear cut off. The movie dragged for most of the 2+ hours, but thank goodness, the two performances maintained my interest as they tried to keep the boy alive.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

alissa914Dec 25, 2017

Mark Wahlberg seemed miscast in this but Christopher Plummer and the rest of the cast seemed to be just fine. In many scenes, it did seem like they digitally edited in Christopher Plummer and you could tell by watching the film. In allMark Wahlberg seemed miscast in this but Christopher Plummer and the rest of the cast seemed to be just fine. In many scenes, it did seem like they digitally edited in Christopher Plummer and you could tell by watching the film. In all fairness, I couldn't see Kevin Spacey doing this roll as well as he did but that type of effect detracted from what was otherwise a decent movie. Still, after seeing this film, it made more sense why the Getty gas stations around here have equipment that hasn't been upgraded in about 25 years.... But it also reminded me of my father who when he was younger would make a lot of money but yet would never really spend it except to give it in taxes to the government. This was on another level but that kind of logic always escaped me and as his daughter in law stated in the movie, "what's the point of having all this money if you're not going to spend it?" All that she had to go through because he would rather buy paintings and houses worth millions instead of saving his grandson.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

eagleeyevikingJul 6, 2018

While the plot is interesting and the characters are well drawn, "All the Money in the World" wastes them in a draggy thriller.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

AxeTDec 30, 2017

Decent, solid filmmaking as always from Ridley Scott and surprising how substantial the role Christopher Plummer came in eleventh hour to replace Kevin Spacey is, and he may deserve an Oscar here even more than what he previously won for.Decent, solid filmmaking as always from Ridley Scott and surprising how substantial the role Christopher Plummer came in eleventh hour to replace Kevin Spacey is, and he may deserve an Oscar here even more than what he previously won for. What's not so surprising is the true story and its been seen countless times scenario, though it does offer some poetic insights into the human condition regarding family, legacy, and money.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

MorganOlsonDec 31, 2017

Ridley Scott’s “All the Money in the World” is a lifeless thriller; acceptable but not admirable. 6/10
The kidnapping of John Paul Getty’s grandson, J. Paul Getty lll is a rousing story, but it’s stifled by the bland, oppressively bleak, andRidley Scott’s “All the Money in the World” is a lifeless thriller; acceptable but not admirable. 6/10
The kidnapping of John Paul Getty’s grandson, J. Paul Getty lll is a rousing story, but it’s stifled by the bland, oppressively bleak, and muted cinematography of Dariusz Wolski. Getty’s estate is drenched in muddled and grainy blacks, much like his frugal soul. But the adherence to such a palette begins to wear on the viewer far before the meandering story concludes. With three time-jumps in the first twenty minutes, this is a story fixated on the journey of a Getty. From childhood, to confused and naïve middle years, to the final confident posture and astuteness of a tried a true Getty. It’s this intention, to span the mental and physical lifetime of a Getty, that ultimately drags the film into mediocrity. While the technicalities fall short, the acting is superb. It is impossible not to praise Christopher Plummer (J. Paul Getty) and Michelle Williams (Gail Harris) performances. With both displaying confidence, deep-seeded spite, and authority in every scene. Mark Walberg (Fletcher Chase) trails just behind, spending the film attempting to convince the audience he’s disappeared into his character only to break the illusion in the end with an unmistakably Walberg, verbal tirade. Romain Druis as Cinquanta also delivers in spades, masterfully pulling off the clichéd parental kidnapper with realism. Ultimately, this is a film that demands focus on the actors. If you look anywhere else, hear anything else but the dialogue, you’ll be sorely disappointed. With a tighter pace, some color saturation, and some desperately needed restraint from the score of the film, “All the Money in the World” could have been a rousing feature. Instead it drifts by, with the one memorable scene already claimed by Van Gogh.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

amheretojudgeJan 15, 2018

joke.. All The Money In The World

Cutting off an ear, pointing out mistakes in each other and overlapping in an argument are some off the intense moments in All The Money In The World by Ridley who is a master in depicting these things withjoke.. All The Money In The World

Cutting off an ear, pointing out mistakes in each other and overlapping in an argument are some off the intense moments in All The Money In The World by Ridley who is a master in depicting these things with conviction but here the script is the bad guy as it takes too much time to sink in and probably wanders off its first hour in prepping the audience for what's about to come. Mark Wahlberg and Christopher Plummer oozes power on screen as they counter attack their opposite characters and wins over the audience like a charm. All The Money In The World definitely stands alone considering its genre but audience seeks more.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

daryljonJan 17, 2018

great story. kidnapping of the grandson of j.paul getty. the acting could have definitely used ousted kevin spacey. both williams and wahlberg are VERY average. movie got long and slow about 2/3 through, which made it just AVERAGE. 6 out of 10.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

TVJerryJan 2, 2018

Of course, the big story here isn't the plot: Teenage grandson of John Paul Getty is kidnapped, while his mother (Michelle Williams) strives to save him. The real story is the re-casting of the patriarch role from Kevin Spacey to ChristopherOf course, the big story here isn't the plot: Teenage grandson of John Paul Getty is kidnapped, while his mother (Michelle Williams) strives to save him. The real story is the re-casting of the patriarch role from Kevin Spacey to Christopher Plummer. He creates a billionaire that's so mean and stingy, there's no option for sympathy. Even Williams' performance, while convincing, never generates any real emotion. Meanwhile, a bland Mark Wahlberg is thrown in the mix as the security advisor to help find the kid. While the story is compelling and Ridley Scott's direction is stimulating, the whole thing is more an interesting history lesson than a moving emotional thriller or a forceful examination of wealth.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

KeithDowJan 4, 2018

Even Michelle Williams couldn't save 'All the Money in the World.' Based on the true story of the 1973 kidnapping of John Paul Getty III, the script was promising enough to attract the likes of Ms. Williams, Kevin Spacey, Mark Wahlberg, andEven Michelle Williams couldn't save 'All the Money in the World.' Based on the true story of the 1973 kidnapping of John Paul Getty III, the script was promising enough to attract the likes of Ms. Williams, Kevin Spacey, Mark Wahlberg, and several other notable character actors. However, the framework ultimately proved to be overambitious, as evidenced by the non-linear structure that was abandoned halfway through the film and the unnecessarily long runtime.

Director Ridley Scott was put in a difficult situation as a result of Kevin Spacey's avalanche of sexual assault accusations, and handled it admirably by cutting the actor's scenes from the film. The role was then re-cast and re-shot with Christopher Plummer as J. Paul Getty, who was recently nominated for a Golden Globe for his performance. My biggest problem with the movie was the cinematography. Most of the film was shot with a blue filter, and while this in itself isn't an issue, certain accommodations on set--such as specific lighting--need to be made. This obviously didn't happen with 'All the Money in the World,' and as a result, countless scenes were drearily flat, if not entirely washed out.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

section20mi6Apr 19, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A tiresome kidnapping story that offers no real meaning behind it. Throughout the whole film, we watch Getty the old man with money continuously loving his money until his change of heart last minute while all the people around him even the kidnappers started acting out as humans with hearts. With solid performance by Christopher Plummer, melodramatic performance by Michelle Williams, endless cut-scenes that look like bad editing and of course a meaningless story about money, All the Money in the world is completely overrated in every way. Bottom line: we don't really care if the boy makes home alive or not because we are really tired.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

PeteOppelMay 3, 2018

The scenes featuring Christopher Plummer as J. Paul Getty are compelling -- he is easily the best thing about this film. The scenes without him are a crashing bore.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Voodoo123Aug 16, 2018

ATMITW should be a thrilling suspense filled story with an array of interesting characters shot to the highest production value. Instead I found there are terrible pacing issues and the sense of threat from the films premise is simply notATMITW should be a thrilling suspense filled story with an array of interesting characters shot to the highest production value. Instead I found there are terrible pacing issues and the sense of threat from the films premise is simply not conveyed well at any level. I felt little to no connection with the characters! No doubt the now infamous and tumultuous production woes didn't help but when it comes to depth in its storytelling there is only a shallow puddle.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RalfbergsAug 21, 2019

THe acting was great and in general it is a nice movie, but nothing great. I mean I read what happened in reality and I think this is depicted too mildly, like it couldve been much more of a thriller while here it mostly shows how greed canTHe acting was great and in general it is a nice movie, but nothing great. I mean I read what happened in reality and I think this is depicted too mildly, like it couldve been much more of a thriller while here it mostly shows how greed can make people act dumb.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

JLuis_001Jan 28, 2018

It's engaging?
Yes.
It's well made? Yes It's has an interesting real life story? Yes It's well acted? Yes It's well directed? Yes, it's Ridley Scott for christ sake Then why only 6? Because I found it incredibly underwhelming. It's evenIt's engaging?
Yes.
It's well made?
Yes
It's has an interesting real life story?
Yes
It's well acted?
Yes
It's well directed?
Yes, it's Ridley Scott for christ sake
Then why only 6?
Because I found it incredibly underwhelming.

It's even boring in some parts, I guess I was looking for something more absorbing, more attractive and entertaining. During the whole duration I felt like something was missing, a crucial turning point. I felt it like a tamed film, where everything is on point but nothing is memorable. Not a setback for Ridley Scott at all but he definitively can do a lot better. Also I cannot say if Kevin Spacey would've make a difference but Christopher Plummer did a pretty good job.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

KaustavApr 7, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This the worst Ridley Scott movie I have ever seen. To be fair, I have seen some of his amazing work in Blade Runner, Gladiator and The Martian. While I know there are other work too, in popular consensus, I have never gotten around anything else that interested me.
As much I dislike what Kevin Spacey did and knowing he was rightly replaced by Christopher Plummer, it is a very obvious observation that He was the best fit to play J Paul Getty ( Remember that shoulder-turn and glasses off makeup look in the trailer?). He was the perfect smokescreen to the story which is bland and almost as miserly as the Senior Getty. Luckily, Michelle William's Abigail Grace Getty is the pinnacle of the movie and she is the single reason why you should watch the movie ( and Mark Wahlberg's subtle machismo as Fletcher Chase is not too bad at all). I would have liked to have asked Mr. Scott and his financial supporters the logic behind paying Williams that much less money in the reshoot than Walhberg. If anything, that kind of additional fund should only be paid to Mr. Plummer who despite the somewhat bland material, does so much for the character, especially in that penultimate conversation in the movie. The guy is beyond legendary status and yet he is every bit as unbelievable as he ever was. Plus, he brought along his grandson, Charlie, whose opening bit and concurrent monologue is what hooks on you for the intended stretch of disappointment that is All The Money In The World.
Let's be honest, when we Ridley Scott make a movie and with a cast that seems that good, we will always come back. A Gladiator and A Blade Runner movie is enough achievement to keep us interested for his entire lifetime. But this movie is a mediocre pesticide to hunt down Spacey's rapey legacy and that is all it will be. Kudos to the Plummers and Williams for doing their best.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

CoKronakanFeb 8, 2019

This does deliver on all of it's genre tags, however it is really poorly executed and the general audience was very bored and they let their voices be heard. It was very un-entertaining and it wasn't fun at all. On top of all this it wasThis does deliver on all of it's genre tags, however it is really poorly executed and the general audience was very bored and they let their voices be heard. It was very un-entertaining and it wasn't fun at all. On top of all this it was really lazy and had a HUGE pacing issue and the plot did not take off even after 20 minutes in the movie. It was very simple, and the anti climactic ending just added to all the flaws this movie already had. The writing was lazy too, the acting was average at best (I love Mark Wahlberg's movies but I don't know how did he get involved with this) and the directing style wasn't creative either. It was 'Lazy' if it where to describe it with one word. I do not consider this movie to hold really amazing art value. I did expect more.
Overall it's an average movie with a decent message at the end but up until that point it was really awful.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

KenROct 9, 2018

OK, we all know that a movie based on ‘true’ events is going to feature some Hollywood style exaggerations but, for a story that so many details are known about - being produced and directed by a ‘big’ name - shouldn’t we expect much moreOK, we all know that a movie based on ‘true’ events is going to feature some Hollywood style exaggerations but, for a story that so many details are known about - being produced and directed by a ‘big’ name - shouldn’t we expect much more controlled believability? Here, we have the kidnapped victim’s mother being involved in close-proximity (and highly deadly) search situations - which we all know is simply outlandish, and unworthy of any work claiming to be a major ‘based on fact’ motion picture (this we expect from a ‘B’ grader but a big $50 million movie?) I had read nothing about the sacking of Spacey in the somewhat repugnant J.Paul Getty role, so the addition of re-shot scenes featuring Plummer offered no problem whatsoever (seems some people overreact to what they read about) The excellent opening line attributed to young Getty, promises more than the overall delivers. With that said...it’s still a good-looking, interesting, suspenseful story, and watch, but is also another reason to question the ability of Ridley Scott to be regarded as a respected mainstream director. It takes more than crowd-pleasing and control of the technical aspects of production - to qualify for the label of ‘great’ director. Michelle Williams as the distraught mother is the best thing about this one – she steals each scene she’s in - bringing a higher calibre to an otherwise ‘could have been better’ feature.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

FlipjeJun 8, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I agree with several other critics here, an interesting subject matter turned into a less-than-thrilling film yet Michelle Williams and Christopher Plummer are both captivating - pun intended. However, despite the two great performances, I spent the whole runtime struggling to feel for any of the main characters. Mark Wahlberg's CIA agent Chase is fine, yet you never get a sense his role is evolving until of all a sudden, he grows a sudden conscience and stands up to his employer, namely Mr. Getty. Plummer plays the billionaire miser with steel-cold callous and he exists in a fine mantle of the rich-man-obssessed-with-wealth yet you never real come to the tragic while Williams' Abigail is either no-nonsense, determined or wearied by her ex-father-in-law. Still, they are commanding but the movie is missing something with them. In contrast, I found I felt more for Paulo (Charlie Faulkner Plummer), the kidnapped grandson and his main kidnapper, Cinquanta (Romain Duris). The opening scene where the young Paolo is walking the streets of Rome... the way the actor carries himself, I was drawn to his portrayal and he brought to the screen a genuine pathos. Romain Duris also brought humanitas to his criminal. Their relationship would have been a more interesting tale. Otherwise, I finished the film with the same ho-hum attitude you get from reading a dry Wikipedia article. Interesting, I sat through the movie but I never felt I got to truly know any of the main three characters. Dramatic fast food... somewhat tasty that leaves you feeling hungry and ... meh.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews