Twentieth Century Fox | Release Date: September 20, 2019
6.2
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 914 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
510
Mixed:
213
Negative:
191
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
0
energystormSep 22, 2019
Rambo está mucho mejor que está peli ,prueba que los críticos solo complacen a quien pague con la cartera
7 of 18 users found this helpful711
All this user's reviews
0
BroyaxDec 8, 2019
Brad Pitre se fait vieux, même qu'il est devenu sérieux avec l'âge et peut-être moins mauvais acteur qu'avant ou bien plus supportable... c'est assez dingue de le dire mais c'est lui qui s'en sort le mieux dans ce psychodrame de l'espace à unBrad Pitre se fait vieux, même qu'il est devenu sérieux avec l'âge et peut-être moins mauvais acteur qu'avant ou bien plus supportable... c'est assez dingue de le dire mais c'est lui qui s'en sort le mieux dans ce psychodrame de l'espace à un demi-dollar (un demi-dollar, c'est ce que vaut le scénario comparé aux dizaines de millions -au bas mot je suppose- qu'ont dû coûter les effets spéciaux !).

L'âge, c'est aussi le troisième et bientôt le quatrième avec Jones et Sutherland... qu'on envoit en fusées dans l'espace, loin, très loin... mais depuis quand envoit-on des Mathusalem en série dans cette putain de galaxie ?!...

Tout ça pour guetter les **** hommes verts ou gris, il paraît... puis la psychologie reprend le dessus ou ce qui rend l'humain si vulnérable : les tourments de sa propre psyché... certes, il est intéressant de mettre en avant ces introspections de tous les instants, surtout lorsqu'on est dans des boîtes de conserve ou des stations claustrophobiques mais tout de même, pourquoi est-ce aussi mal fait et à peine au niveau des Feux de l'amour ou de Santa Barbara ?

Dans ce scénario aberrant qui part déjà d'une histoire à la Petite Maison dans la Prairie, il ne se passe de toute façon quasiment rien. Même la réalisation n'est pas sans défauts et souvent agitée dans ses rares scènes d'action. Evalutation psy : comment vous sentez-vous après avoir vu "Ad Astra" ? réponse : je me sens énervé et endormi, abruti et floué. Et très déçu. Et vindicatif aussi.

Ad purgatum donc ! (vers la poubelle en latin).
Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
0
TrapKing101Nov 27, 2019
Straight up garbage. RATHER WATCH LITERALLY ANYTHING ELSE. No wonder I have heard nothing about this film lol.
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
0
bojan1080Feb 2, 2020
The **** movie I have ever seen and believe you me I have seen a lot of **** movies
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
GalazarDec 8, 2019
One the dullest and most boring films I've had the displeasure of watching.
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
0
LodrianMar 25, 2020
It's a religious ****
Not scfi, not et life, not nothing... Only saints and angels.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
NakorenSep 28, 2019
I didn't actually know what film I am going to watch and after film I understood that I lost my money. I would say seriously nearly 6 people in cinema laughed, I also wanted to cry.
Film don't has bad picture. But it has very stupid plot. I
I didn't actually know what film I am going to watch and after film I understood that I lost my money. I would say seriously nearly 6 people in cinema laughed, I also wanted to cry.
Film don't has bad picture. But it has very stupid plot. I really don't know who think that it is good idea to sneak. Into the rocket in 5 minutes before launch and then kill all people inside ple inside
Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
0
FloridaMommaSep 20, 2019
Plain boring. Waste of 2 hours! Huge waste this is what they chose to put on Dolby screen.
13 of 32 users found this helpful1319
All this user's reviews
0
JadoaustinSep 20, 2019
This movie was an emotionless 2.5 hour movie without meaning or thrill. It takes you through space watching emotionless charters that you end up feeling no connections to. This movie over all was as life changing and entertaining as staringThis movie was an emotionless 2.5 hour movie without meaning or thrill. It takes you through space watching emotionless charters that you end up feeling no connections to. This movie over all was as life changing and entertaining as staring at wall for 3 hours! Expand
11 of 25 users found this helpful1114
All this user's reviews
0
ShibaboySep 21, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ad Astra is a new low for post-truth anti-science propaganda which bear hugs a dystopian fascist future. Avoid this movie! Expand
8 of 24 users found this helpful816
All this user's reviews
0
bryanjSep 21, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A very boring film, with a stupid ending. why would you park your spaceship on the wrong side of Neptune's rings? how can you then jump from one spaceship to another passing through the rings with a piece of metal in front of you then ride a nuclear blast home? Expand
7 of 22 users found this helpful715
All this user's reviews
0
Ope1Sep 21, 2019
What a piece of garbage. Do not waste 2+ hours of your life on this borrrrrring trash.
5 of 20 users found this helpful515
All this user's reviews
0
DirtyshoesSep 21, 2019
This movie is painfully slow. The characters are boring. Scenes meander and go no where. There are sequences that contribute nothing to the characters. The movie crutches on the pretense of being an artwork or philosophical piece. Oh it's aThis movie is painfully slow. The characters are boring. Scenes meander and go no where. There are sequences that contribute nothing to the characters. The movie crutches on the pretense of being an artwork or philosophical piece. Oh it's a piece alright. What did I learn at the end of the movie? I should have walked out and asked Brad Pitt personally to reimburse me.such a waste. So many special effects and nothing to say. I hated this movie so much I created an account to warn others. Expand
6 of 18 users found this helpful612
All this user's reviews
0
Just_DoSep 22, 2019
Borefest. The most boring **** ever. WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
6 of 20 users found this helpful614
All this user's reviews
0
DhSantaFeSep 22, 2019
I’m a sci-fi fan and was looking forward to this film. It was one of the worst sci-fi films I have ever seen. Correction: it was one of the worst films I’ve ever seen. Clearly, the producers thought that casting Pitt would excuse allI’m a sci-fi fan and was looking forward to this film. It was one of the worst sci-fi films I have ever seen. Correction: it was one of the worst films I’ve ever seen. Clearly, the producers thought that casting Pitt would excuse all shortcuts and low-budget cost-cutting that was needed.

With a budget of $85 million, reported, they clearly decided they could not afford to hire a reputable physicist-consultant. The abject disregard of physics made this film laughable. And pathetic. Want to see a film that actually thinks the laws of physics are real? Watch “The Expanse”, or better yet, read it, I was embarrassed to spend money seeing this film. I will lie if someone asks me if I’ve seen it.
Expand
11 of 22 users found this helpful1111
All this user's reviews
0
RmelsonjrSep 22, 2019
As beautiful and well acted as it was STUPID. Rewatch Interstellar if you are looking for a space odyssey.
6 of 19 users found this helpful613
All this user's reviews
0
DumplebugSep 24, 2019
I don't want to make a in depth review as not to waste more of my time being involved with this movie. Firstly, I am a sci-fi enthusiast. I saw the original Star Wars in the theater in 1977 over 30 times as a kid. Critics are different thanI don't want to make a in depth review as not to waste more of my time being involved with this movie. Firstly, I am a sci-fi enthusiast. I saw the original Star Wars in the theater in 1977 over 30 times as a kid. Critics are different than moviegoers. We are interested in being entertained. This movie was horrible. Snail paced and boring from the first scene to the last. Don't waste your time. Don't listen to critics. Just don't go. Expand
7 of 20 users found this helpful713
All this user's reviews
0
Seadog2019Sep 24, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Bad Astra; worst sci-fi movie of all time?


Basically this film steals from multiple movies to create the most terribly disjointed and inane plot that I've ever had the misfortune to see. From Last Man it steals it's depiction of Neal Armstrong and renames that character Roy McBride. From 2001 it steals the apes... (yes, there are apes in the film...) and the lunar transit scenes and from Guardians of the Galaxy it steals space pirates... (yeah, space pirates!) from Gravity it steals the space ships, space suits and tether lines. From Alien it steals the distress call... (see apes above). From Interstellar it steals the music and from Stars Wars it steals the son must kill father to destroy the deadly space station plot line. From the Red Green show, it steals the duct tape...(yes, really!) From Soylent Green it steals Saul's final moments (AKA "calming rooms") and from Blade Runner 2049 it steals the Baseline Psych Test... From 2010 it steals the shock-wave and from Independence Day it steals the bomb... Donald Sutherland simply reprises his role from JFK while Liv Tyler's scenes were just ripped off from LOTR. This movie is an insult to the intelligence of the audience and reveals just how much contempt Gray and/or the producers have for their audience. Basically this movie is a Voight-Kampff Test that ferrets out Replicant critics when they write glowing reviews for terrible movies. I gave the film a 0 out of 10 which I'm happy to do because on most review sites I can't give it a zero. If you watch it, treat it as a comedy and you'll have great fun. My wife and I compared notes after the movie and both realized that we were afraid during the movie that we somehow missed something that caused the critics to give it good reviews... then we laughed so hard that it was hard to stop because it really was terrible and it was the critics who were afraid to say so.
Expand
6 of 15 users found this helpful69
All this user's reviews
0
Catr3Sep 27, 2019
Mira esta peli es una mierda lenta floja y literal mente estoy escribiendo esto en el momento mas "Critico" de la peli
-1/10
3 of 18 users found this helpful315
All this user's reviews
0
Cyruss77Oct 5, 2019
honestly are we watching the same film here? no story to speak of an absolute flat line of a movie great actors talents wasted completely i want my 2 hours life back please!!
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
0
hovtekFeb 14, 2020
I’ve never been so riled up about a movie being so bad. I love space. I love dirt. This is more boring than the cats trailer If you stretched it out over 2 hours. It’s not deep, their are NO TWISTS AT ALL, the writing contains every tropeI’ve never been so riled up about a movie being so bad. I love space. I love dirt. This is more boring than the cats trailer If you stretched it out over 2 hours. It’s not deep, their are NO TWISTS AT ALL, the writing contains every trope ever said, and I’m literally mad I spent Valentine’s Day watching this. Even acid couldn’t make this movie compelling. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
UomovisoDec 24, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Do you even science bro?

Ad Astra is set in the near future, but anchors itself in the technological aesthetics of the present. Spacesuits look pretty much the same as they do now, spaceships are still launched with rockets, and air locks are still a thing. In other words, it looks like it's based on real science. No Klingons here.

But apparently the film's $100 million budget didn't extend to hiring an astrophysicist to sound the alarm whenever its already tenuous connection to the truth snapped like a space elevator made from chewing gum. So what follows is an indignant review of its six most shockingly awful violations of scientific principles.

There are plenty of spoilers, but don't worry, you're not going to see the film anyway.

1. Gravity on the Moon ain't what it used to be

The scene: Brad Pitt and Donald Sutherland arrive on the Moon. Travel bags over their shoulders, they ascend an escalator and saunter through the spaceport.

The science: gravity on Earth is 9.8m/s2, but gravity on the Moon is just 1.6m/s2. Unless Brad and Donald are both super comfortable suddenly weighing 16% of their usual weight, they would bounce their way straight into the spaceport ceiling and an unhealthy dose of brain damage.

The fix: install some handrails, Moon government.

2. You can't skid to a smoking stop in space

The scene: Brad hitches a ride on a cargo spaceship travelling from the Moon to Mars. Halfway there, the ship's captain receives a mayday call from another spaceship orbiting a nearby asteroid.

The science: since space is a vacuum, the only way a spaceship can slow down is to fire its rockets in the opposite direction of its travel. Brad's ride is well into its journey when the mayday call arrives, so it's going very, very fast. It would therefore be impossible to stop in time to help out without turning Brad and the ship's crew into meat paste.

The fix: ignore the mayday, captain.

3. We have a stowaway

The scene: Brad is on Mars but wants to go to Neptune to see Tommy Lee Jones. Unfortunately, Space Command doesn't want him to go. So Brad dives through a lake at the base of the spaceship that Command is preparing to launch to Neptune, climbs up the side of the ship as its rockets are firing and breaks in moments before it launches.

The science: the Martian permafrost is between 3.5-8km deep, which means there are no liquid lakes anywhere on the surface of Mars.

Bonus science: Climbing up inside the launch tube of a spaceship as its rockets are firing = instant and fiery death.

The fix: I can't even.

4. Life's pretty fine in Neptune orbit

The scene: Tommy is living in a small spaceship orbiting Neptune, which he has called home from the past twenty years. There is no gravity on the spaceship.

The science: in zero gravity, Tommy's bones should lose 12% of their density per year. As he has lived in zero gravity for twenty years, his bone density should be negative 140%. This would make Tommy a roughly human shaped sack of jelly.

The fix: design your ship to spin along its axis, Tommy, and use centrifugal force to create the impression of gravity. Duh.

5. Surfing the rings

The scene: Brad needs to get back to his spaceship after visiting Tommy's. Unfortunately, he forgot where he put his EVA shuttle. So he rips off a sheet of metal from Tommy's ship and jumps off it. Brad's jump is a good one, but the rings of Neptune stand between him and his ship. He uses his sheet of metal as a shield to protect him from harm.

The science: Brad's ship is 3-4km from Tommy's. Even assuming Brad has a superhuman jumping power that lends him incredible strength and accuracy, he still has to deal with the pesky rocks in Neptune's rings. The metal shield might stop the rocks from killing him, but each of the many impacts would still retard or deflect his path of travel, leaving him stranded to die.

The fix: don't lose your shuttle next time, Brad.

6. Everything can be solved with a nuclear bomb The scene: Brad makes it back to his spaceship, but doesn't have enough fuel for the return journey to Earth. Fortunately, he left a nuclear bomb on Tommy's spaceship so eyeballs the direction back to Earth, waits for the bomb to explode and rides its pressure wave all the way back home. The science: sweet baby Jesus, where do I start? First, space is a vacuum so a nuclear explosion does not create any form of pressure wave at all. Second, even assuming this isn't true, Neptune is 4.4 billion kilometres from Earth and Brad lines up his position between the explosion and Earth by eye. If Brad is even 0.1 degree out, he would miss Earth by 7.5 million kilometres, which is around twenty times the distance from the Earth to the Moon. The fix: don't fly to Neptune unless you've got the juice to get back home, Brad. I give this shockingly awful, steaming mess of a film zero stars and ask: who the hell keeps giving James Gray money? Definitely do not see it.
Expand
7 of 10 users found this helpful73
All this user's reviews
0
EnseedeeAug 8, 2020
Possibly the worst movie ever made. No coherent plot. Terrible acting. Horrid SFX. I, too died in space while watching this terrible movie.
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews