400 Days

XLrator Media | Release Date: January 15, 2016

5.0	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 11 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

daveixoJul 2, 2016

"400 Days" is to "10 Cloverfield Lane" as "Deep Star 6" was to "Abyss." The writers heard the basic idea and said, "Yeah, we can do that easy." No, you really can't. Like 10 CFL, it starts with the craziness of isolation, and the audience can"400 Days" is to "10 Cloverfield Lane" as "Deep Star 6" was to "Abyss." The writers heard the basic idea and said, "Yeah, we can do that easy." No, you really can't. Like 10 CFL, it starts with the craziness of isolation, and the audience can feel the storm building, but when it breaks, it comes in a way that could have been interesting, but in the end devolves into cliche post-apocalyptic stupid. The movie ends in a way that answers a question, it's just not the question anyone cares about. That burning question (what the heck happened) is left completely unanswered, unless we're supposed to buy an answer given by a crazy man that makes no sense. I love weird stories, but you still have to make sense in the end. That's where this movie fails.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

NeelyryFeb 20, 2016

I thought this was great. I have no clue why the critic review are so bad. I feel like they just didn't understand the ending. SPOILER ALERT. Walters message was obviously pre recorded

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

abm0Nov 12, 2017

I liked the premise so I thought I'd give it a shot despite the rating, but it's actually seriously bad. Every major plot element is stupid, the only good thing in all this are the actors (except Dane Cook, of course, who constantly looksI liked the premise so I thought I'd give it a shot despite the rating, but it's actually seriously bad. Every major plot element is stupid, the only good thing in all this are the actors (except Dane Cook, of course, who constantly looks like he's mocking you). I could've lived with the cheap sets, I've seen amazing sci-fi made on a tiny budget before (Moon, Monsters, 3%), but there was no redeeming quality here. Just skip this one, it's a waste of time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews