Read User Reviews and Submit your own for 300 - Page 5

7

JamesV.Mar 17, 2007

It makes me laugh to see that people are putting a 0 for a rating. my reason is that it should disserve at least a 4. bio-dome is considered one of the worst most movies ever and even that waist of celluloid recieved more than 0. alot ofIt makes me laugh to see that people are putting a 0 for a rating. my reason is that it should disserve at least a 4. bio-dome is considered one of the worst most movies ever and even that waist of celluloid recieved more than 0. alot of these critics don't even know how a tv spot is made, let alone an entire movie. yes, the acting seemed sub-par, but the visuals were done very well with the combinations of blue and green screening and a ton of miniatures. they did what they set out to do and that was to turn Frank Miller's 300 into a live action, and they did that well, not great, but well done.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RalphPicciottoMar 17, 2007

Good action movie. Graphics were amazing. I got what i payed for.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

MimiB.Mar 17, 2007

Lots of style, lots of bellowing instead of acting and comic book violence for it's own sake. The portrayal of the Persians is absurdly biased, inaccurate and zenophobic. Butler is ripped and loud, but nothing else about his performance Lots of style, lots of bellowing instead of acting and comic book violence for it's own sake. The portrayal of the Persians is absurdly biased, inaccurate and zenophobic. Butler is ripped and loud, but nothing else about his performance will be remembered. He's Gerard One Note in this film, but then, it's a comic book/video game brought to the big screen after all, so maybe he's just right, considering. I found the film unpleasant and over the top.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

JesusC.Mar 16, 2007

After watching the first 30 minutes, you've basically seen the whole movie. The fight scenes were awesome at first, but just keeps getting recycled over and over again. 300 also lacks a real plot and is hampered by subpar acting. All After watching the first 30 minutes, you've basically seen the whole movie. The fight scenes were awesome at first, but just keeps getting recycled over and over again. 300 also lacks a real plot and is hampered by subpar acting. All the hype for nothing. 3/10 for decent visuals.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

NataliaR.Mar 16, 2007

It was a very good movie. A lot of action in this movie which was good for this boring time of the year. We needed this movie to get us ready for the summer season.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AaronP.Mar 16, 2007

This is the best movie I've seen this year so far.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

PaulMar 16, 2007

Just an average movie. Yeah it was pretty, but the disappearing blood bothered me a bit. It's just ehhhhh. Wait for a rental.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

MattM.Mar 16, 2007

A letdown. If you look at it historically, if you look at it from having read the original graphic series, if you look at it from simple film-making. I came into the theatre *thrilled* to be there -- shelled out the extra money for IMAX, A letdown. If you look at it historically, if you look at it from having read the original graphic series, if you look at it from simple film-making. I came into the theatre *thrilled* to be there -- shelled out the extra money for IMAX, even. I love the original story of the Spartans, I loved Sin City (same writer and director pair as 300) -- how could it lose? I was so completely disappointed with this. Crazy-stupid mutants, for no reason. Ridiculous lines thrown in, like Miller is trying to enter current U.S. politics. What a waste.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JBMar 16, 2007

I find it very odd that there are so many bad reviews on here, when I have met no one that disliked the movie. Sure, it might not have been historically accurate, but keep in mind that it is based on a GRAPHIC NOVEL (meaning, in a sense, a I find it very odd that there are so many bad reviews on here, when I have met no one that disliked the movie. Sure, it might not have been historically accurate, but keep in mind that it is based on a GRAPHIC NOVEL (meaning, in a sense, a comic book.) You have to suspend disbelief for a few hours and just ENJOY the movie. 300 is the kind of movie that makes me want to be a better filmmaker. The cinematography of the film is gorgeous. The intensity of the film kept the entire theatre at the edge of their seats. The beginning is a little slow, as are most scenes that explain the exposition and background of a character. Other than that, the scenes were beautifully crafted so that there wasn't too much action without a storyline. Definately see this film in the theater if you can. Make your own judgment about it. There is a story, and there is a purpose, but it will be different for everyone.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

RolloT.Mar 16, 2007

I liked it. So what if it wasnt accurate. Most movies are? It entertained me.....thats what counts.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

HeatherC.Mar 16, 2007

This movie is gorgeous to behold! There is bloodshed, but that is unavoidable in a tale that pits 300 Spartans protecting their right to live as free men against a massive army of invading Persians. The bloodletting is not so much extreme as This movie is gorgeous to behold! There is bloodshed, but that is unavoidable in a tale that pits 300 Spartans protecting their right to live as free men against a massive army of invading Persians. The bloodletting is not so much extreme as it is relevant and poetic and stylized. Zach Snyder has portrayed this battle - which includes skewered limbs and decapitations - with an artistic grace that removes the 'cringe' factor. The spattering blood is not overdone. It is relevant and understandable. It is elemental. I am a woman and I drank this movie in. 300 strips away all the nonsense that we are sometimes subjected to in story telling and gets to the basics. There is no foolish fluff in this movie. It is raw! Every word, move, action, look and sound is relevant. The soundtrack blends flawlessly. There is nothing to distract you from the pure beauty of the visuals and the unprocessed emotion portrayed. 300 is about strength and honor and courage and even love. I know… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

NicholasB.Mar 16, 2007

Overall, the movie was fine. But for something one ths scale I expect more than just fine. I would have liked to see more plot, but I guess that wasn't the point of the movie. The ending was pretty weak sauce, as they fight for days to Overall, the movie was fine. But for something one ths scale I expect more than just fine. I would have liked to see more plot, but I guess that wasn't the point of the movie. The ending was pretty weak sauce, as they fight for days to die in about 2 minutes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SyedI.Mar 16, 2007

It's a visual treat. Go watch it guys.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

BobC.Mar 16, 2007

If I were a 15 yr. old boy, this would be the greatest movie ever (until the next epic came out). But I'm not, and while the visuals are well-done; there is nothing really new or ground-breaking here - and the REAL story of Thermopylae If I were a 15 yr. old boy, this would be the greatest movie ever (until the next epic came out). But I'm not, and while the visuals are well-done; there is nothing really new or ground-breaking here - and the REAL story of Thermopylae is so much more interesting. Sin City is a MUCH better adaptation of Frank Miller's Work. So much potential and hype left me disappointed and somewhat bored.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

BrandonD.Mar 16, 2007

I've seen it twice (don't ask). It's not so much the acting but the script....it seemed as if it was read right from the comic book. The action is good but the Spartans are kind of hard to like. Yes, they are tough as hell but I've seen it twice (don't ask). It's not so much the acting but the script....it seemed as if it was read right from the comic book. The action is good but the Spartans are kind of hard to like. Yes, they are tough as hell but they come off football player jock dicks, dumb lines like "you fight like a girl" and the annoying "whoo whoo whoo" chants.. The sex scene and the hunchback could have been left out.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JulieM.Mar 16, 2007

This movie was a visually stunning and artistic way to express the idea that was Sparta. If this movie was supposed to be an exact history lesson, it would not have been made in this fashion. It would have been shot on location. The This movie was a visually stunning and artistic way to express the idea that was Sparta. If this movie was supposed to be an exact history lesson, it would not have been made in this fashion. It would have been shot on location. The computerized scenes were different and refreshing and I believe mandatory to express Frank Miller's novel. I highly enjoyed this movie and cannot wait to buy it on DVD.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JohnMar 16, 2007

Brilliant execution throughout of bringing a graphic novel to film. If as much focus was given to casting and writing as was allocated for visual effects; this movie would be disgustingly awesome! 9 out of 10.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ArionS.Mar 16, 2007

Fantastic movie that entertained for the the whole 2 hours. I got my money's worth and will see it again and again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

sluzeMar 15, 2007

this film is one the most visually beautiful films i've ever seen in my life. its more epic then braveheart, more violent then the matrix films, and about as historically accurate as pearl harbor (by far one of the worst films i'vethis film is one the most visually beautiful films i've ever seen in my life. its more epic then braveheart, more violent then the matrix films, and about as historically accurate as pearl harbor (by far one of the worst films i've ever seen). the violence is very prominent but stylized and entertaining in a way that makes it matter of fact (as opposed to purposeful a la Schindler's List; what i thought was a very violent film). the love scene is shot in such a way that you fall in love with the couple; in a way so you believe in their love (the essence of all love making is the expression of such; its an entirely different thing to exude that feeling visually...quite impressive).
is the film campy? yes and no; this is how we believe they would talk and look and feel. we all watched braveheart and thought, 'ya that's how they'd talk and act and live etc.' b/c we look at that time period as dark and unsophisticated. we look at the greeks at socialized and understandable and that's what we get. it is definitely a love or hate film, i don't think there is an in the middle with this one nor do i think you can blame someone for hating or loving it. its one of those films that you see and think one of two ways; 1. amazing, beautiful, epic or 2. gratuitous, spacious, pointless. and depending on what your expectations were is where you'll sit. a note to those that have not seen the film: expect a violent, fast paced and action driven film not a historical, slow, plot/dialogue drive piece.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

SteveAMar 15, 2007

Basically, you have a king who is so stubborn that he defies oracles, elders, politicians, and even some of his own people to go to war. He charges into battle and is victorious at first, but then begins to lose. Discontent grows at home, Basically, you have a king who is so stubborn that he defies oracles, elders, politicians, and even some of his own people to go to war. He charges into battle and is victorious at first, but then begins to lose. Discontent grows at home, and the leader of the senate tries to halt sending more soldiers into war....You can see where I'm going. I loved this movie, though. I liked its message of never giving up in the face of adversity. The visuals were great, and I found the pacing taut. I also loved the hard rock soundtrack.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BruceF.Mar 15, 2007

Pleasing to the eye,gritty,a tale of strength and honor and glory.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

RaymondR.Mar 15, 2007

This film intentionally twists the history and tells a highly inaccurate tale of the battle between the Persians and Greeks. As for entertainment value: you'll get bored after 30 minutes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

ManM.Mar 15, 2007

You can watch this movie without even going to the movie theatre! Just stay at home and play Gladiator, Braveheart, Van Helsig, and Gigli at the same time and you will see the same two hours of crap! Worst movie ever (until Transformers).

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

Jonathanf.Mar 15, 2007

Visually arresting, and great fun. although quite strange and unbelievable at times.. you'll know what i'm talking about once you've seen it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnB.Mar 15, 2007

I give this movie an 8 not because it is a good movie but because it is a good movie to watch. There is a delineation between the two. 300 is not thought provoking or extraordinarily deep...but DAMN is it fun to watch! The cinematography was I give this movie an 8 not because it is a good movie but because it is a good movie to watch. There is a delineation between the two. 300 is not thought provoking or extraordinarily deep...but DAMN is it fun to watch! The cinematography was gorgeous and seamless and the fight scenes were very well choreographed. For those who complain about its historical accuracy...people...this movie was based on a graphic novelist's exaggeration of the original story. And to add to the people who complain that it's a "propaganda movie:" This was a historical event that took place 2000 some odd years ago, so to say that we are giving it modern attributions is borderline ridiculous. Also...300 vs. a metric ton of soldiers sounds more like the insurgency vs. the US rather than the other way around. That being said, I would highly recommend going to see this movie for its sheer entertainment value. If you go expecting to see a "Best Picture of the Year" movie then don't. If you go expecting to see eye candy in every sense of the word then absolutely go.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BrandonMMar 15, 2007

This film is all about bending history and art, from my eyes. Sure, it might not follow the true story. But what hollywood movie/comic does? Galdiator did not follow the truth. If a movie were to follow the true story of anything, no one This film is all about bending history and art, from my eyes. Sure, it might not follow the true story. But what hollywood movie/comic does? Galdiator did not follow the truth. If a movie were to follow the true story of anything, no one would watch it, at least the mass. This movie has a great mixture of art and the art of war. A very poetic movie based off a graphic novel. Along with the violence you have nudity, but not demeaning at all. To me this film reminded me of all the old ancient greek/roman statues we all see. Like Nike adjusting her sandles, the oracle dances in the nude with similar thin silky robes wrapped around her body. One thing that bugs me about the whole Sparta vs Persian debate is that people try to nit pick everything they see. Right now the Iranians are having an uproar because they think the "persians" in the movie depick them as what they used to be. First thing first. This movie does not say "america vs Iraq." This movie is about the 300 spartans that went to war with all of persia. Persia is not Iraq. Sure, they are in the same place...but Persia is dead. This is just a movie off of a Graphic Novel. The monsters in the movie are creative, they remind me of something you will see in a comic book. Anyways, enough of my rant. If you have not seen the movie yet because of the reviews on this site, then you are missing out on a great experience. I went into this movie not knowing anything really and came out excited and ready to see it again. 300 is a masterpiece.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AaronEMar 15, 2007

You know a movie is good is when the only people who don't like it either support a country who denies the holocaust, works for the AP and/or can't realize that history is full of heroes and villians. This movie doesn't singleYou know a movie is good is when the only people who don't like it either support a country who denies the holocaust, works for the AP and/or can't realize that history is full of heroes and villians. This movie doesn't single out a culture it singles out an event in history that is both brilliant and compelling and adds some hollywood flare to bring in the money.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

SJ.Mar 14, 2007

Worst film of the year. This proves that not anybody can make a good movie from miller's books. I love sin city.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

RomanZ.Mar 14, 2007

Cool special effects but after a good hour it could bore your eyes out. Poorly written, dialogue was very amatuer and characters were not at all convincing. The whole glam-metro look with the costumes and make-up really reminded me of "Zena Cool special effects but after a good hour it could bore your eyes out. Poorly written, dialogue was very amatuer and characters were not at all convincing. The whole glam-metro look with the costumes and make-up really reminded me of "Zena Warrior Princess" television series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

SharonMar 14, 2007

Everyone knows that the first signs of civilization was seen in "modern Iran". Persian Empire was the most powerfull empire at the time. This movie is historically inaccurate. The question here is, how it got permission to come out on the Everyone knows that the first signs of civilization was seen in "modern Iran". Persian Empire was the most powerfull empire at the time. This movie is historically inaccurate. The question here is, how it got permission to come out on the screen and tell people that "yeah, this is how persians were (violent and stupid) and this is how greeks were (spritual and passionate)"! It doesn't make any sense. Anyone who knows a little bit about world's ancient history would know that this is not true.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TheKingMar 14, 2007

Awesome. "300" is why people go to see movies. If not, it's why they should go to see movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

JonasM.Mar 14, 2007

Being a fan of comic books, greek mythology, and ancient history, it would seem that someone like me would like this movie. But you know what; I'm also a fan of good movies. I'll start with the positives. The movie is extremely Being a fan of comic books, greek mythology, and ancient history, it would seem that someone like me would like this movie. But you know what; I'm also a fan of good movies. I'll start with the positives. The movie is extremely good-looking, and I wouldn't be surprised if it gets nominated for art direction. And people are complaining about it being historically inaccurate. Duh! Didn't you see the previews. This movie's about a certain style, not a history lesson. Having said that, the action was boring because most of it was in slow motion. It seemed like half the movie was in slow motion. I've also read that people say its really manly, but its dumb, meat-head manly. And I'm all for sex, but what's the deal with the awkward, pointless sex scene. And it was hard to get "inspired" by this movie (unless inspired means going to the gym, but still, I would rent "Pumping Iron.") I didn't leave it thinking "man, those spartans went through a lot, dealing with giant rhinos, giant deforms with axes, and ninjas." It would have been good if it was a stupid, fun movie, like Sin City, but a stupid, inspirational movie?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DizzleMar 14, 2007

This film was just complete and utter sex. I'm certain everyone got a hard on after watching. INCLUDING THE GIRLS! From viewers in the theater the terms 'Filmgasm' and 'Epicgasm' were stated. I know people This film was just complete and utter sex. I'm certain everyone got a hard on after watching. INCLUDING THE GIRLS! From viewers in the theater the terms 'Filmgasm' and 'Epicgasm' were stated. I know people who've went to see it at least twice. And people who've went to see it in the IMAX. I usually don't even enjoy these types of movies. But this one stole my heart.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AlexanderN.Mar 14, 2007

I can totally see this as a 'love it or hate it' type movie. Visually it is stunning. The action sequences are well shot, and it has some pretty quarky one-liners that will get you a laugh. On the other hand, there's not a lot I can totally see this as a 'love it or hate it' type movie. Visually it is stunning. The action sequences are well shot, and it has some pretty quarky one-liners that will get you a laugh. On the other hand, there's not a lot of character development. Some plot lines seem like they could of done without (the wife trying to get reinforcements). And if you're not into that kind of humor, those quarky one-liners could be just cheesy and dumb. I liked it. I will buy it when it comes to DVD. But honsetly I thought Sin City was better.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CharlesW.Mar 14, 2007

Beautiful movie in the graphic novel style. It's clear that most critics just don't understand the medium because it is still relatively new. If people don't understand that this movie is not intended to take itself as Beautiful movie in the graphic novel style. It's clear that most critics just don't understand the medium because it is still relatively new. If people don't understand that this movie is not intended to take itself as historical fact, they will enjoy the movie far more.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

niazMar 14, 2007

please! if someone is making a movie , it has to be representing the whole true face of that nation. we are not here to restate the histrory as 300 is trying to do. characters are not and not representing anything but a false idea about theplease! if someone is making a movie , it has to be representing the whole true face of that nation. we are not here to restate the histrory as 300 is trying to do. characters are not and not representing anything but a false idea about the persians and their nations, if u read the history you will see what i am saying, a movie has to be based on reality not a personal view of what u think or what u want other ppl to think.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful

10

KB.Mar 14, 2007

An excellent film, stylish looking, with superbly crafted battle scenes, that clearly show the audiance the art that is Spartan combat. I have seen and read the negative reviews others have written and can only say this. If you go to this An excellent film, stylish looking, with superbly crafted battle scenes, that clearly show the audiance the art that is Spartan combat. I have seen and read the negative reviews others have written and can only say this. If you go to this movie understanding that this is a comic book adaptation of an actualy historic event, you won't be disappointed. However, if you are looking for historic accuracy you will be greatly disappointed. This is a BIG movie, with BIG lines. There are very few subtlety with the exception being between Queen Gorgon and King Leonidas, but the movie conveys pure power of conviction, all the more palitable because it did happen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

IanI.Mar 14, 2007

I'm suprised this has such a low metascore, thought perhaps it was for the better because its score deffinatly lowered my expectations when going in to see the film, before reading the reviews here I was rather excited about the film, I'm suprised this has such a low metascore, thought perhaps it was for the better because its score deffinatly lowered my expectations when going in to see the film, before reading the reviews here I was rather excited about the film, thankfully I let my curiosity get the better of me and went and saw it anyways. It was a great film, I'm not sory at all I saw it. Many reviewers have stated the the film is hallow and lacks emotion or substance, and to some extent this is true. This is (suprisingly) not a movie you will be thinking about the next day for any reason other than the cenamatography. Its the first matrix film if you compleatly removed the plot. Its well done and pretty to look at and has exelent action but that realy is the extent of the offer for the most part...but it deffinatly does not feel "hallow", but like I said, you won't be thinking about it tomarow. It tells the story its trying to tell in a very mater of fact manor and it does that well. Its no Gladiator, but its deffinatly worth seeing in a time where most movies are compleate let downs. You will only be unhappy if you go in thinking is another epic, it falls a bit short but if you expect little, you will be pleasently suprised. This movie is diserving of a green score in my book.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ConnorB.Mar 14, 2007

Simple Movie on the surface, But it entertains throughout. Overall I thought it was very worth the $8 I spent to go see it. No character depth, but it sucked me in.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TB.Mar 14, 2007

Gladiator meets Sparta. I wanted to go lift weights or cut people's heads off after this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

BrioneMar 14, 2007

It is a beautiful film and other than that, there isn't much to it but 300 spartan men who don't want to give up.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

HeruclesDohMar 14, 2007

This has to be the first movie since Hitlers propaganda movies in the 40's to depict an entire civilisation (Persian) as subhuman. Way to go guys... so the "ragheads" are demons and goblins now. Was the shock and awe not effectiveThis has to be the first movie since Hitlers propaganda movies in the 40's to depict an entire civilisation (Persian) as subhuman. Way to go guys... so the "ragheads" are demons and goblins now. Was the shock and awe not effective enough?
You know what this movie needed!
Terror Alert:High… Expand

13 of 26 users found this helpful

10

ChrisR.Mar 13, 2007

It shows you what real men are.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RyanPMar 13, 2007

This is truly a next-generation film. While the story may be lacking, the photography and design is amazing and epic. This is some of the best action I've seen ever! If you're into epics and action, this is something you MUST see This is truly a next-generation film. While the story may be lacking, the photography and design is amazing and epic. This is some of the best action I've seen ever! If you're into epics and action, this is something you MUST see on the big screen, don't just watch the DVD!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

CasperMar 13, 2007

Simply put, if you are looking for a movie with complex characters, keep looking. If you want to be inundated with Playstation 3 gore and pseudo-sexual closeups of muscular men, run to see this "film".

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

Edee^_^Mar 13, 2007

If you are looking for an intellectual movie, please turn now and go see Children of Men, if you are looking for a movie with testosterone you are in for a treat. I was flabbergasted by the picture; frame by frame it unveiled a masterpiece If you are looking for an intellectual movie, please turn now and go see Children of Men, if you are looking for a movie with testosterone you are in for a treat. I was flabbergasted by the picture; frame by frame it unveiled a masterpiece of art. I did not stop ceased to be astonished by the visual effects. Then there were the battle scenes that definitely got your adrenaline rushing through your veins. I believe that men will love this movie, but women will also hop on the band wagon, I certainly did! 300 men, scantly clad with bulging muscles, it gave me heart palpitations throughout the entire movie! All in all, I give it a 10 because it advertised exactly what it is, a battle epic which will make you want to be a testosterone filled Spartan!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

OrenKMar 13, 2007

Absolutely visually stunning. The departures from the graphic novel (extended role of the queen) kinda pissed me off, but other than that -- great movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

KobeeH.Mar 13, 2007

I gotta be honest. Probably the most honest as you're gonna hear about this movie. 300 is just...OK. The visual style, while pretty cool, wasn't evolutionary or revolutionary. Just....cool. As for the story...meh. Don't really I gotta be honest. Probably the most honest as you're gonna hear about this movie. 300 is just...OK. The visual style, while pretty cool, wasn't evolutionary or revolutionary. Just....cool. As for the story...meh. Don't really care about the characters or the emotions they're conveying. Pretty forgettable. Just pretty much interested in seeing what would happen in the next battle. To be honest, the CG background, while beautiful at times, can kinda take away from the look and just be distracting. I appreciate 300 for trying some new things from the cinematography standpoint, but otherwise don't go in looking for anything else except for kinda cool eye candy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

KatieS.Mar 13, 2007

Everybody who is not white, male, heterosexual, and physically un-handicapped is a good guy. Everybody else... is not.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JayV.Mar 13, 2007

No movie will top this all year! If you are a girl and cant tolerate an action packed movie on steroids with a great story behind it, this film is not for you (you might say it has a poor script and give it a 4, stay home you fruit!). Never No movie will top this all year! If you are a girl and cant tolerate an action packed movie on steroids with a great story behind it, this film is not for you (you might say it has a poor script and give it a 4, stay home you fruit!). Never a dull moment in the whole movie, i recommend it to everyone.... you will want to see it again the moment you leave the theatre.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

KevinL.Mar 13, 2007

I agree with Shawn M. - "Great visuals. Poor scripts. Laughable acting." Halfway through, all I could think about was how I couldn't wait to watch Gladiator instead of this.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PeteL.Mar 13, 2007

People need to realize that the movie was taken directly from a graphic novel. Frank Miller isn't exactly known for the dialogue in his work. It is essentially a live action version of the work on the page, from the costumes, sets, People need to realize that the movie was taken directly from a graphic novel. Frank Miller isn't exactly known for the dialogue in his work. It is essentially a live action version of the work on the page, from the costumes, sets, watercolor emulation, to the bad dialogue. Just take it for what it is and don't try to project the standards of cinema onto something that is outside those bounds.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MikeJ.Mar 13, 2007

It is a visually beautiful film, and it allows that to remain the focal point. Not every film needs deep, complex story lines or character development. Sometimes, all a film needs to be is visually stunning and slightly engaging. If the It is a visually beautiful film, and it allows that to remain the focal point. Not every film needs deep, complex story lines or character development. Sometimes, all a film needs to be is visually stunning and slightly engaging. If the visuals are not top notch, the film will be weak. This film is not weak. Why do so many people need huge character issues and development for a movie to be classified as "good". The Spartans in the film were who they said they were...to the end. That is what makes it great.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

RichardM.Mar 13, 2007

Lame, lame, lame, lame and lame. Only adolescent fanboys (and those who wish they still WERE one) will be impressed by this tortuously slow six-pack-ab-fest. If the whole thing were run at normal speed, it would have been over in an hour and Lame, lame, lame, lame and lame. Only adolescent fanboys (and those who wish they still WERE one) will be impressed by this tortuously slow six-pack-ab-fest. If the whole thing were run at normal speed, it would have been over in an hour and we could have salvaged our night...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RugbyLoverMar 13, 2007

This movie would be hated by movie critics. It wasn't made for them. It was made for us who love a movie where determination, fraternity, no fear and over confidence are shown so beautifully. This movie was amazing. When the characters This movie would be hated by movie critics. It wasn't made for them. It was made for us who love a movie where determination, fraternity, no fear and over confidence are shown so beautifully. This movie was amazing. When the characters have dialogues, it's meant to be over the top and humorous. The decapitations even become humorous. It's meant to be!! And I loved every minute of it. It also didn't hurt that every man wore just a cape and leather briefs.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AnonymousMCMar 13, 2007

Battles are not about dialogue and the Spartans were notoriously terse. The choreography and gritty, surreal CG made up for the simplistic plot line. Why expect anything but laconic wit (google it) and brutal violence from a movie about Sparta?!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ColinMar 13, 2007

Great movie, hey, if critics hate it, it means its going to be a hit. What do critics know? Nothing, they told me Titanic was a good movie and i wasted $5 to see it. Cant trust them, they dont know movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChristopherA.Mar 13, 2007

Forget the critics on this one; they dont have a clue. If this movie fails to make your blood red hot, then you arent a man. It was a simple movie, but pure and strong. This is a most excellent movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ChrisMar 13, 2007

This is a fantastic movie and does not deserve the rating that it got. Maybe if all the critics would actually watch the movie and see more than what is there rather than basing their judgement on the surface of the film they might become a This is a fantastic movie and does not deserve the rating that it got. Maybe if all the critics would actually watch the movie and see more than what is there rather than basing their judgement on the surface of the film they might become a little more respectable as people.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SamS.Mar 13, 2007

Just as the LA Times reviewer stated that "unless you love violence as much as a Spartan, Quentin Tarantino or a video-game-playing teenage boy, you will not be endlessly fascinated." But if you do fall under any of those categories, you are Just as the LA Times reviewer stated that "unless you love violence as much as a Spartan, Quentin Tarantino or a video-game-playing teenage boy, you will not be endlessly fascinated." But if you do fall under any of those categories, you are in for an excellent fusion of CG and acting.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

THEDAVEMar 12, 2007

This movie was the sh!t. If you haven't seen it, you need to. It is Gladitor times 10!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MikeS.Mar 12, 2007

I just cant believe these critics. Sure, we are all entitled to opinions, but I'm starting to question WHO decided that some of these critics are professionals in the motion picture industry? I'm assuming the critics were either a) I just cant believe these critics. Sure, we are all entitled to opinions, but I'm starting to question WHO decided that some of these critics are professionals in the motion picture industry? I'm assuming the critics were either a) having a bad day and needed to vent or b) watched the wrong movie, thinking it was 300. "300" is incredible. Everything from the acting, to the screenplay & cinematography was amazing. Not perfect, but very entertaining and visually stimulating the entire film. The visuals alone dictate a rating above "53" that the critics are giving it. Story wasn't the greatest, but as a whole, this movie is up there with "Gladiator" and "Braveheart". Better? I wouldn't dare go that far, but "300" is still a solid film from opening credits to the end. Fight scenes were intense and very realistic with a touch of CGI and cool camera effects to add some Miller-esque flavor to the mix. This movie makes me even more impressed with the Spartan warriors of their time. Simply amazing. Go see this film and be the judge yourself. I'm starting to doubt critics more and more often. I guess thats why they are called "critics".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ZackMar 12, 2007

300 is a visual feast. A breath taking picture and one step forward in terms of technological acheivement.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ThomasE.Mar 12, 2007

I preordered my ticket and waited for 20 minutes to get into the theater and got a seat way in front to the side and it was still worth it. This movie moved me. I wish i could have seen the IMAX but it was sold out for 3 days straight in my theater.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

RezaJ.Mar 12, 2007

Unfortunately, this movie is all lies and lies and lies. The most glorious civilization on the face of Earth throughout the history (Persian Empire) has been pictured so wrong that the movie has turned into a spagheti of historic lies and Unfortunately, this movie is all lies and lies and lies. The most glorious civilization on the face of Earth throughout the history (Persian Empire) has been pictured so wrong that the movie has turned into a spagheti of historic lies and not worth watching if one cares about the contents of what they're watching to be true or false. I'm sure reading a little history wouldn't hurt anybody and on the contrary, will shed some light on such misleading stories that try to degrade a civilization where the first statement of "Human Rights" came from.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DemetriS.Mar 12, 2007

Exquisite visuals, beautifuly staged battles and emotionally engaging story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DerekC.Mar 12, 2007

Are you serious 53 out of 100 This movie is my second favorite movie now The action in this movie just doesn't stop, the most unbelievable movie Ever and plus it was based on a true story a Easy 10/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DonE.Mar 12, 2007

The best movie I've seen in the theater since Silence of the Lambs.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

MoneyhausMar 12, 2007

A huge fan of Sin City, I had high hopes for this second Miller novel filmatization. The movie employs much of the same great visual style as Sin City, especially with the great backdrops. I'd give this movie a high rating purely in A huge fan of Sin City, I had high hopes for this second Miller novel filmatization. The movie employs much of the same great visual style as Sin City, especially with the great backdrops. I'd give this movie a high rating purely in terms of the visuals, but visuals alone do not make a movie. While the visuals are creative and original, the script unfortunately isn't, featuring cheesy lines and acting typical of any epic movie, and the action is woefully predictable. Besides the visuals, there is just nothing original about this movie, nothing that Braveheart, Troy, Alexander etc didn't already beat to death.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AnonymousMCMar 12, 2007

An incredible graphic novel adaptation. Frank Miller truly knows how to create an entertaining movie. Zach Snyder's direction and the post-production put into this movie make it as visually beautiful as "Hero."

If you are lookingAn incredible graphic novel adaptation. Frank Miller truly knows how to create an entertaining movie. Zach Snyder's direction and the post-production put into this movie make it as visually beautiful as "Hero."

If you are looking for a historically accurate movie, watch a documentary on the Battle of Thermopylae, because you will not find it here.

A stylized depiction that reminds me to never forget the real warriors who died to save everything they valued.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MattE.Mar 12, 2007

After seeing this movie, i am extremely tempted to: Get a short haircut, grow a mean goatee, and get jacked out of my mind. definitely one of the best movies of 07. so far.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JustinT.Mar 12, 2007

This movie is amazing, it captures Millers 300 in every single frame as intended by Snyder. This film isn't a historical film so by no means is it accurate, but thats the beauty of it, in those times war stories were hardly accurate This movie is amazing, it captures Millers 300 in every single frame as intended by Snyder. This film isn't a historical film so by no means is it accurate, but thats the beauty of it, in those times war stories were hardly accurate anyways, they were brought up to epic proportions, just like this film. The way the movie is put together is some of the most artistic work i have seen in a while. The only reason someone wouldn't like this film is if they had a personal grudge against Frank Miller, or were persian.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

CUMar 12, 2007

A dimly lit decapitation and nipple fest.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

DaveG.Mar 12, 2007

A silly, foolish film about nothing worthy or accurate. Garbage. F Tries to be visually stunning, and throws old techniques and annoying plot all over the place.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JFoxMar 12, 2007

I'm not a comic book fan ... but this is magnificent. Great art, action and a tale of bravery, honor, and sacrifice for freedom. No wonder so many critics don't like it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JordanQ.Mar 12, 2007

I don't know what the heck all the critics were talking about. I loved the movie and it was everything I had hoped it would be. I plan to buy the dvd when it is released. Finally a movie well worth the box office price!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AnthonyO.Mar 12, 2007

Action throughout 85 percent of the movie..loved it...

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

christosMar 12, 2007

This movie is great. Its action sences are pimpin', but some other parts are a little boring. But still the awsome fighting makes up for it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JimP.Mar 12, 2007

Some movies are meant to be over-the-top. 300 is a testosterone-dripping masterpiece laden with male-oriented dialogue, action, heroes, villians, action, and gore delivered with stunning scenic backdrops and a rocking score, making this an Some movies are meant to be over-the-top. 300 is a testosterone-dripping masterpiece laden with male-oriented dialogue, action, heroes, villians, action, and gore delivered with stunning scenic backdrops and a rocking score, making this an instant "guy movie" classic.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful

0

MattA.Mar 12, 2007

This might be the worst movie I have seen in a theatre in the last 5 years. The charachter development was non-existant, the story went nowhere, and the slow motion kill trick that the director utilized in a failed attempt at drama was used This might be the worst movie I have seen in a theatre in the last 5 years. The charachter development was non-existant, the story went nowhere, and the slow motion kill trick that the director utilized in a failed attempt at drama was used so many times that it must have added 30 minutes to the running time. I've played video games with better direction. I'm sure the comic book fans will love it, but everyone else should stay away at all costs.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

ArturoC.Mar 12, 2007

It is what it is. It would be wrong to expect more from an ultra-violent, macho film, about blood, guts, and heroic monologues. Oh and what is a movie for male adolescent without hot women and a steamy sex scene in slo-motion. C'mon the It is what it is. It would be wrong to expect more from an ultra-violent, macho film, about blood, guts, and heroic monologues. Oh and what is a movie for male adolescent without hot women and a steamy sex scene in slo-motion. C'mon the packaging is very straight forward. I think it would be the viewer's fault to expect some kind of responsible message from it. It's not like it was pretending to be higher than a blood and guts movie, let's just take it for what it is.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DroogMar 12, 2007

300 is not a great film. It's not even a good film. It's just awesome -- that's all there is too it. The awesomeness of 300 defies any notion of plot, characterization, or dialogue that a high-brow critic will try to attach to 300 is not a great film. It's not even a good film. It's just awesome -- that's all there is too it. The awesomeness of 300 defies any notion of plot, characterization, or dialogue that a high-brow critic will try to attach to it because this movie doesn't even pretend to have any of those attributes. The film eschews such pointless things as nuance and pacing to become the action movie every 13-year old boy has ever dreamed of seeing. Muscular men decapitating demon-warriors? Check. Elephants pushed off cliffs? Check. Hot women in pointless sex scenes? Check. Patriotic monologues about "freedom"? Check. 300, in other words, is a wet-dream on steroids. What's wrong with that?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AaronO.Mar 12, 2007

I dont know what all these critics are talking about. This was not supposed to be a historically accurate movie so i have no idea how it can be used against it. If you look from the visuals its not supposed to be realistic but look cool. The I dont know what all these critics are talking about. This was not supposed to be a historically accurate movie so i have no idea how it can be used against it. If you look from the visuals its not supposed to be realistic but look cool. The directing was awesome, the action was awesome, the acting was great(considering it also was not to be taken seriously), and the style of this movie was just phenomenal. These critics when they saw it were looking for the wrong thing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SaraMar 12, 2007

Visually amazing. Decent story, though it had some very weak plot points (especially the stuff that wasn't in the comic). The battle scenes coupled with the hot bodies will have the guys' AND the girls' pulses racing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TomSMar 12, 2007

Enjoyed this flick. Thought the visuals were great. Not sure why folks didn't like the acting. Sure I doubt that the Spartans went to battle naked as they were, but then I also doubt that wolves had glowing eyes back. It'sEnjoyed this flick. Thought the visuals were great. Not sure why folks didn't like the acting. Sure I doubt that the Spartans went to battle naked as they were, but then I also doubt that wolves had glowing eyes back. It's called 'imagination'. Use some.

All in all good movie.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful

9

NormanD.Mar 12, 2007

Absolutely fabulous movie that is both visually satisfying and emotionaly moving.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

YayaF.Mar 12, 2007

It's not based on history, and even sometimes it's not related to Frank Miller's comic book. It lacks truth and honesty. A Persian king as a black man! Persian people were as civilized as Greece people were. None of them were It's not based on history, and even sometimes it's not related to Frank Miller's comic book. It lacks truth and honesty. A Persian king as a black man! Persian people were as civilized as Greece people were. None of them were stupid and both believed in freedom and humanity. Once Xerxes attacked Greece and another time Alexander attacked Persia. BE HONEST! that's all.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JamesN.Mar 11, 2007

Take ear-plugs. Omitting the dialouge, and musical score is the best thing you can do to help this movie. Just admire the hypnotic visuals and create your own plot. No matter what your created plot is, it will be better than the one the Take ear-plugs. Omitting the dialouge, and musical score is the best thing you can do to help this movie. Just admire the hypnotic visuals and create your own plot. No matter what your created plot is, it will be better than the one the screenwriter has provided.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

WuzzaL.Mar 11, 2007

No shock that our nation's film critic vanguard - a wan and gloomy bunch whose chief product is ungratefulness and negativity - are widely appalled at the most pro-Liberty, pro-Western, dare I say pro-American and unapologetically No shock that our nation's film critic vanguard - a wan and gloomy bunch whose chief product is ungratefulness and negativity - are widely appalled at the most pro-Liberty, pro-Western, dare I say pro-American and unapologetically pro-martial film perhaps ever made. God forbid anyone tells the true story of free men of the West defeating an army of slaves from the East. It is such an inconvenient truth to those who are ashamed of the privileges they enjoy, and dismissive of their source. And because God doesn… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

ShawnM.Mar 11, 2007

Great visuals. Poor script. Laughable acting.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChristineG.Mar 11, 2007

This is the best movie that I have seen in quite a while. It should win awards for its style/visuals. Kept me entertained and emotionally involved the whole time. This is not a "movie" or a documentary for that matter. 300 is a film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

HootchieMommaMar 11, 2007

The Most incredible, heart pounding movie I have ever had the pleasure of viewing. Simply the best manly man, action packed, rip-your-face-off-and-kick-you-in-the-nuts flicks you will ever see!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CharlieW.Mar 11, 2007

One of the coolest movies I have ever seen. It could have benefitted from more plot development, but other than that, I was blown away by this film. The speech at the end is epic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

KentMar 11, 2007

Where's the Blood ? Ok, ok - there was lots of "CG" blood - but where was the blood that "should have been there" ? There were stabbings, impalings, decaptations and more - blood was "flying around", but apparently it all evaporated !! Where's the Blood ? Ok, ok - there was lots of "CG" blood - but where was the blood that "should have been there" ? There were stabbings, impalings, decaptations and more - blood was "flying around", but apparently it all evaporated !! None landed on anyone, on the ground, on the sheilds - no blood to be found anywhere ! Even the bodies of those killed with arrows lying on the ground there was no blood surrounding the punctures. Ok, so you may say that it was supposed to be "art" and not reality - fine - but for my tastes, it seems like a glaring omission of detail that would have made a bigger impact if they had actually left the blood in. Lastly - I have NO idea what was historically accurate versus what was made up - (and I don't really care) - but what struck me as odd was that why-oh-why, if you "had" hundreds of thousands of Spartans to send to battle, why would you only send 300 ?? If you were the King - just "do" it ! Why be a slaughtered lamb for nothing ?? This lack of logic is just as dumbfounding as that stupid Last Samurai movie, where they all went to battle for the sake of stupidity - and even after losing, life went on as it did before - (basically they fought and died for nothing). You would think that I did not like the movie from this review - but apart from the lack of "logical" blood and the fallacy of the slaughter of the 300 lambs - I thought the movie was thoroughly enjoyable. (Yes, I just said I thoroughly enjoyed it !)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NateC.Mar 11, 2007

Awesome!!! This movie is epic, deep, and just overall cool. The backrounds make it look like a painting. Spartans are like super-human. Don't listen to the the bad reviews. The critics need to get off their high horses and realize that Awesome!!! This movie is epic, deep, and just overall cool. The backrounds make it look like a painting. Spartans are like super-human. Don't listen to the the bad reviews. The critics need to get off their high horses and realize that movies like these aren't supposed to be realistic, or accurate, or original. They're supposed to be visually stunning and fun, which this movie is. See the movie, now, and in Imax to.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DaveMar 11, 2007

Going into the movie, I had a pretty high expectation of the movie from the previews. While it's certainly not one of the 50 best films of all time, I would have to say that I enjoyed watching it. The cinematography and effects were Going into the movie, I had a pretty high expectation of the movie from the previews. While it's certainly not one of the 50 best films of all time, I would have to say that I enjoyed watching it. The cinematography and effects were amazing. Like Paul K said, I would recommend the movie to anyone who was interested in the preview. Certainly not for those who hate to see ultra-violent flicks (which is definitely keeping within the style of Miller). Be prepared to see just about every human body part flying in the air at some point...just without the massive blood spurt that would come with its sudden removal. Now if you'll excuse me, I have about 10,000 crunches to do.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

JoeAverageMar 11, 2007

Was expecting something akin to the imagination and fun of Sin City. Instead, a HUGE disappointment. Not sure why they need someone else to direct this. Frank Miller could have done it while waiting for Sin City 2 to start up. A Was expecting something akin to the imagination and fun of Sin City. Instead, a HUGE disappointment. Not sure why they need someone else to direct this. Frank Miller could have done it while waiting for Sin City 2 to start up. A '1' for trying desperately to recreate the mini-series. Unfortunately, they forgot its visual imagination and to bring anything new to the table.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MelM.Mar 11, 2007

Beautifully realized, high octane film that delivers visual thrills from start to finish.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

KyleS.Mar 11, 2007

I was skeptical going into it, seeing as how Sin City was, in my humble opinion, horrible. But I thought this was pretty fantastic. I'm surprised the critics only gave it a 53. There was certainly nothing in it or missing to warrant I was skeptical going into it, seeing as how Sin City was, in my humble opinion, horrible. But I thought this was pretty fantastic. I'm surprised the critics only gave it a 53. There was certainly nothing in it or missing to warrant that low of a score, ESPECIALLY considering most of the movies that received comparatively higher scores. In the end, it was a solid movie, a fun one to sit through, and worth seeing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

KevinM.Mar 11, 2007

A very visually pleasing movie, and great effects. Who cares if the narrative or characterization isn't strong in the movie? That wasn't the point of it. It also was certainly not meant to be historically accurate (they had A very visually pleasing movie, and great effects. Who cares if the narrative or characterization isn't strong in the movie? That wasn't the point of it. It also was certainly not meant to be historically accurate (they had monsters back then!?). It's a fun movie to watch that will give you chills. If you want to see the true beauty of motion (or just the mostly manly movie ever) watch this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful