10 Cloverfield Lane

2

ianmustardMay 10, 2016

A large part of my dissatisfaction with this film comes with the fact that this movie attempts to be a kind of disturbing psychological thriller; then becomes annoying product of Hollywood. The first evidence of this comes from the overtlyA large part of my dissatisfaction with this film comes with the fact that this movie attempts to be a kind of disturbing psychological thriller; then becomes annoying product of Hollywood. The first evidence of this comes from the overtly dramatic music at the most inappropriate times throughout the film. In places where I wanted to feel a sort of suspenseful silence, there were these swashing of overpowering a overt strings that, rather than building suspense, completely took me out of the moment. The culmination of this was in the movies final moments. I yearned for a cliffhanger, or something that was less blaring with her escape, perhaps ending with the view of the helicopter, and the audience not knowing whether it is aliens or humans. But instead it had to make it BLATANTLY OBVIOUS what the MORAL STORY OF THE MOVIE IS by yelling it at the audience's faces. No tact, no subtlety. I had hopes for this film and was hugely disappointed.… Expand

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

8

dr34mf0xMay 8, 2016

You gotta respect a movie that ends the way this movie does. You just gotta, it's the law.

Aside from that, watch this movie because even if you hate it, you'll be supporting the good and pure original ideas department, which has beenYou gotta respect a movie that ends the way this movie does. You just gotta, it's the law.

Aside from that, watch this movie because even if you hate it, you'll be supporting the good and pure original ideas department, which has been starving in a basement for a long time now.

At least I think it's an original idea. Too lazy to research that.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

PurguinsMay 7, 2016

It was a fairly good film despite a little bit disappointing ending. The whole movie kept me on the edge of my seat and was suspenseful as well despite the last minutes of the movie which was cliche ish and not thrilling at all

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

bcdserraMay 6, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I really don't understand those high scores.
I love film, I almost love them all and I always find the good in them or at least appreciate what critics and other users saw in them. In this one however, the only good I found were the performances.
I don't get the "John Goodman is bad, no he's good, oh wait no he's bad with a little monster action in the last 5 minutes".
Make this a 100% psycho kidnapper movie or use that gimmick for suspense in the first half hour of a real monster movie and you've got a working formula.
Instead we get this schizophrenic treatment of the story that didn't make sense, and most viewers seem to think there's that brilliant twist, like nobody remembers the big spoiler that is THE TITLE OF THE MOVIE.
This leaves even the most openminded viewer with only one option when watching this: waiting for the creature to appear onscreen.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

anshimanMay 6, 2016

Shot with a pleasant paradigm shift from the found-footage style that 'Cloverfield' so famously helped popularise, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a powerful but wonderfully strange air-tight narrative about looking life in the face. Its transitionShot with a pleasant paradigm shift from the found-footage style that 'Cloverfield' so famously helped popularise, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a powerful but wonderfully strange air-tight narrative about looking life in the face. Its transition from a suspense thriller to a balls to the wall science fiction film shows its subversiveness - and flaunts itself proudly as an experiment - something that so many sequels (spiritual or chronological) dare not do.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

1

CharlemagneMay 5, 2016

Pointless cheap "wait, wait, wait, then jump out and shout boo" thrills. Looking up the background of this movie I see why, they took some unrelated movie "The Cellar" and made it into a 'spiritual' sequel to Cloverfield. The original wasPointless cheap "wait, wait, wait, then jump out and shout boo" thrills. Looking up the background of this movie I see why, they took some unrelated movie "The Cellar" and made it into a 'spiritual' sequel to Cloverfield. The original was pretty good because it made the science fiction feel real, but this... 95% hackneyed 'psychopath thriller', 5% C-grade science fiction. I gave it 1 star for Mary Elizabeth Winstead, but now think less of her.

OMG! I just found out this is another JJ Abrams destruction of a previously good franchise.… Expand

5 of 15 users found this helpful510

All this user's reviews

8

Jack97May 5, 2016

The mystery from the trailers thankfully paid off as no spoilers or major plot points where given. Therefore I was always engaged with this film since I never knew what was coming next, and the twists and turns caught me be surprise. Bravo toThe mystery from the trailers thankfully paid off as no spoilers or major plot points where given. Therefore I was always engaged with this film since I never knew what was coming next, and the twists and turns caught me be surprise. Bravo to the director and to the cast, John Goodman is terrifyingly awesome and Mary Elizabeth Winstead is very strong here. If you like thrillers, see this as soon as possible.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

csw12May 5, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is a smart psychological thriller that has deeper meanings within it. Great cast and a director that did a superb job of keeping you at the edge of your seat. The best movie so far this year.

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

7

shoulderoforionMay 5, 2016

I wasn't expecting much, having heard how people were disappointed, but I really did like this flick. Goodman was outstanding, Winstead & Gallagher both great, and there's more than a little actual SciFi going on at the end. I'd recommend it.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

Antgiog1202Apr 27, 2016

The greatest thing about 10 Cloverfield Lane was that I didn't know what to expect coming into this movie. This was an outstanding Sci-Fi Thriller with it's breathtaking acting performances and direction of new comer Dan Trachtenberg. The oneThe greatest thing about 10 Cloverfield Lane was that I didn't know what to expect coming into this movie. This was an outstanding Sci-Fi Thriller with it's breathtaking acting performances and direction of new comer Dan Trachtenberg. The one performance that stands out the most was John Goodman. He was fantastic and I truely believe that he is a definate Oscar contender for the Best Supporting Actor category. Unfortunately, the Academy snubs great performances every year -- including Albert Brooks in Drive.

The only problem I have with the film is the way they titled it 10 Cloverfield Lane. It has nothing to do with it's predecessor so why give it that name? I feel as if it was a way to lure the audience into seeing this film since the first one was a success they can receive a higher gross. Because who wants to see a film about a girl trapped inside a house after a nuclear reaction... right?

10 Cloverfield Lane is everything you'd want to see in a Sci-Fi Thriller and will make you remember it for years to come.

Rating: 8/10

A+ = 10
A = 9
A- = 8
B+ = 7
B = 6
B- = 5
C+ = 4
C = 3
C- = 2.5
D+ = 2
D = 1.5
D- = 1
F = 0… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

DualyApr 25, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is certainly one of the strangest films I've ever seen, yet it's strange in very good way. The 3 main actors we got were fantastic especially John Goodman, the script was great and those 3 characters we very interesting10 Cloverfield Lane is certainly one of the strangest films I've ever seen, yet it's strange in very good way. The 3 main actors we got were fantastic especially John Goodman, the script was great and those 3 characters we very interesting and the creepy factor throughout the film I think helped me like it more. I would recommend this film, unless you don't like creepy stuff.
Final Score-8/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AgentVenom117Apr 23, 2016

This movie has an incredible atmosphere,amazing build up,brilliant acting especially from John Goodman and it keeps you interested until the horribly disappointing ending which I won't get into. But overall 95% of this movie is great and youThis movie has an incredible atmosphere,amazing build up,brilliant acting especially from John Goodman and it keeps you interested until the horribly disappointing ending which I won't get into. But overall 95% of this movie is great and you should defiantly check it out.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

8

LoveeLandApr 21, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane may be the most suspenseful movie I have ever seen. John Goodman did an outstanding job in playing a truly unpredictable character that makes those watching question him the whole way. Mary Elizabeth Winstead did a great10 Cloverfield Lane may be the most suspenseful movie I have ever seen. John Goodman did an outstanding job in playing a truly unpredictable character that makes those watching question him the whole way. Mary Elizabeth Winstead did a great job in her role as well while bringing a little humor to the screen. The movie is truly remarkable, however I found the end to be rushed and a little underwhelming when you finally learn what happened on the surface. Overall it is definitely worth the money!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

So far the best film of 2016. The film is like an intense ride that keeps going. It keeps you at the edge of the seat waiting for moments and asking "What could possibly happen next?" The film mixes a slew of genre from sci-fi to horror toSo far the best film of 2016. The film is like an intense ride that keeps going. It keeps you at the edge of the seat waiting for moments and asking "What could possibly happen next?" The film mixes a slew of genre from sci-fi to horror to psychological thriller. John Goodman is at his peak and a defining role since Argo. Dan Trachtenberg is a new and promising director and delivered very well. Go see it and you won't be disappointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

lanceeyyApr 17, 2016

Well acted, and incredibly tense, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a well shot, well directed film that is completely different from its predecessor. The shaky cam is nowhere to be found here (thank God). Praise John Goodman's performance; he broughtWell acted, and incredibly tense, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a well shot, well directed film that is completely different from its predecessor. The shaky cam is nowhere to be found here (thank God). Praise John Goodman's performance; he brought constant chills down my spine as the film's antagonist.

I should also point out that I never knew that this movie was related to the original Cloverfield. I just thought it something of a coincidence, I made the connection late in the film. Eerie, thrilling, and well acted, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a must watch for anybody looking for a thrill!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MrJimmyApr 16, 2016

If you were planning on watching this film hoping to get answer to all the questions you have had since watching Cloverfield, this film will disappoint you as it has none. This film does have something much better than answer though, evenIf you were planning on watching this film hoping to get answer to all the questions you have had since watching Cloverfield, this film will disappoint you as it has none. This film does have something much better than answer though, even more questions! The film starts of with Mary Elizabeth Winstead character Michelle running away from her life before being run off the road and waking up in a bunker occupied by Howard (John Goodman), who claims to have brought her there to wade out the apparent attack on the country. Also in the bunker is Emmett (John Gallagher Jr) who says he there for protection. But through several twist and turns you start to question the nature of Michelle situation, the Motivation behind her abduction and the fate of the world above the bunker. As each new revelation into what is happening is revealed the tension grows and grows. John Goodman plays his role as dooms day prepper, conspiracy nut brilliantly. The film constantly makes you re-evaluate your opinion of him going from a nut to, good Samaritan who has your sympathy, to possible someone much sinister. The film however lies mainly on the shoulders of Mary Winstead as it is through her eyes the audience watches the film and she is excellent through out. Michelle is a thoroughly engaging and resourceful character who you are one hundred percent routing for from start to finish. Emmett is also well played and will have you hoping he makes it out okay as well as being a brilliant friend for Michelle and source of irritation for Howard. The ending is as tense as the rest of the film and shows of the how bad ass Michelle is whilst adding so much more to what intrigue to what Cloverfield is and what is to come next. All round the movie is superb and as much as I hope all this will be explained, having it be what it is and making no sense with no context to what is happening is equally as entertaining.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Filmcritic1Apr 15, 2016

Whether you saw the trailer on January 14th or just heard about it on your phone at the theater, you were glad you saw this movie. Not only does the creepy atmosphere get you enticed with the amazing performances by John Goodman and MaryWhether you saw the trailer on January 14th or just heard about it on your phone at the theater, you were glad you saw this movie. Not only does the creepy atmosphere get you enticed with the amazing performances by John Goodman and Mary Elizabeth Winstead, this movie sets up the Cloververse as the movie version of The Twilight Zone.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

micahezzesApr 15, 2016

Incredibly tense and well-paced with sudden bursts of comedy to relieve the tension, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a wonderfully dark look at a life spent entrapped and its toll on the human psyche, without preaching or talking down on its viewers.Incredibly tense and well-paced with sudden bursts of comedy to relieve the tension, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a wonderfully dark look at a life spent entrapped and its toll on the human psyche, without preaching or talking down on its viewers. It's incredibly suspenseful, with enough payoff at the ending to keep you satisfied with the build up. John Goodman, as always, steals every scene he is a part of, using phenomenally creepy yet endearing versions of his character one after the other.

My only complaint, and I understand why they did this, is that the ending felt a bit like a big-budget ending that didn't fit the rest of the film. Yes, the payoff is good and unexpected (at least for me), it drags on a bit out of its own bunker and dips its feet in the water of a big-budget action sci-fi film. I see why they did this; it leaves the opportunity for sequels of greater name value or production value. And there's not necessarily anything wrong with that concept, it's just that it didn't fit the rest of the film thematically.

Having said that, 10 Cloverfield Lane is one of the most suspenseful movies I've seen in recent years, keeping shots tight and balanced with great performances from all three of the main characters.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

DatamariApr 14, 2016

Very VERY good!
10 Cloverfield Lane, directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a fantastic film that can be enjoyed by anybody who enjoys thrillers. It's not necessarily a sequel to Cloverfield, but more like a spiritual successor. The two filmsVery VERY good!
10 Cloverfield Lane, directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a fantastic film that can be enjoyed by anybody who enjoys thrillers. It's not necessarily a sequel to Cloverfield, but more like a spiritual successor. The two films take place in the same universe, but they more or less happen at the same time. Don't go into this movie thinking it'll be a sequel. The movie itself is fantastic, it stars Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Michelle, a girl who, after getting into a car crash, wakes up in a fallout shelter with a mysterious man, played by John Goodman. He claims that the air above is unbreathable, and that he quickly took her and another man, played by John Gallagher, Jr., and they have to stay underground. I absolutely love this movie; Dan Trachtenburg was an amazing director. Although this isn't a horror movie, I was scared out of my mind that something bad was going to happen at every single situation. Throughout the film, we as the viewer have literally no idea what is going on, and if this guy is sane or not. We have no idea if the man is right, the air is toxic, and we're just seeing him the wrong way, or he's batsh*t insane and the air is just fine. Every time Michelle and Howard were in one scene at the same time, I was genuinely nervous as to what would happen between the two. The main selling point of this movie is it's tension, and it brought it. Sure, the ending was pretty abrupt, but I absolutely love this film, and is easily one of my favorite movies of 2016 so far.

10 Cloverfield Lane gets a 9/10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

NerdConsultantApr 11, 2016

Damn this was such a good movie. the story is great, the actors give good performances especially John Goodman who steals every scene he's in, and the cinematography is absolutely fantastic. it's only weakness is it's attempts to tie itselfDamn this was such a good movie. the story is great, the actors give good performances especially John Goodman who steals every scene he's in, and the cinematography is absolutely fantastic. it's only weakness is it's attempts to tie itself to the Cloverfield franchise towards the end of the movie which I don't feel fully works.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

5

skipper23Apr 10, 2016

The movie was boring at parts and the ending, in my opinion, was unsatisfactory. Other than that, I felt that John Goodman played a good antagonist and the movie was suspenseful at times.

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

9

tomtinApr 10, 2016

I enjoyed the original Cloverfield film and thought the trailer for this seemed good but very mysterious, I went to see it with a friend who didn't really want to go as she claimed 12A films are not scary or exciting. Well its safe to say sheI enjoyed the original Cloverfield film and thought the trailer for this seemed good but very mysterious, I went to see it with a friend who didn't really want to go as she claimed 12A films are not scary or exciting. Well its safe to say she was wrong, the film builds suspense brilliantly from the beggining all the way through till the very end, the shocks and turns at every corner are amazing and you dont see them coming. The film really shows how monsterous and unpredictable humans can be when stuck in a bunker together, fans of the original film wont be disappointed however as near the end you do get a glimpse of the how the world is now after the orginal film ended, and its great. The cast where well picked, with a decent female lead and of course John Goodman is outstanding, you dont know whether to fear him or feel sorry for him (till the truth eventually comes out). Overall a truly fantastic film that I cant wait to see again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TornadoCreatorApr 9, 2016

I went into this film without any knowledge of Cloverfield and from what I've heard that was the right choice. Eschewing the "found footage" style of the previous film, this is instead, a more traditionally shot psychological thriller and oneI went into this film without any knowledge of Cloverfield and from what I've heard that was the right choice. Eschewing the "found footage" style of the previous film, this is instead, a more traditionally shot psychological thriller and one of the better ones I've seen in a long time. With great pacing, fantastic acting, and a simple but well explored story I found myself on the edge of my seat throughout. The film manages to bring tension to simple scenes and explores our perceptions of others, our ability to trust, etc. multiple times. You'll find yourself questioning everything and repeatedly changing your mind as you watch this film, not knowing what to believe.

So far this is my favourite film of 2016, and I've seen pretty much everything that's come out this year so it's up against some stiff competition.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

LowrMrtnApr 9, 2016

This mystery thriller will have you on the edge of your seat the whole time. Darting rapidly back and forth between laughs and scares, you won't be able to take your eyes away. Just as you think you've grasped the plot it takes you in a wholeThis mystery thriller will have you on the edge of your seat the whole time. Darting rapidly back and forth between laughs and scares, you won't be able to take your eyes away. Just as you think you've grasped the plot it takes you in a whole new direction. If you are considering seeing this movie I implore you to do so, you won't be disappointed!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

papeadojhonApr 8, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is full of suspense and mistery until the end. Good performances by all the three leads, and, not exactly a Cloverfield sequel like, at all, but as a solid tension-filled thriller, it stands o its own. The third act10 Cloverfield Lane is full of suspense and mistery until the end. Good performances by all the three leads, and, not exactly a Cloverfield sequel like, at all, but as a solid tension-filled thriller, it stands o its own. The third act however, it felt rushed and abrupt, it feels like another movie, but I did like it, the problem is that, it's rushed and you want to see more, but it isn't necessarily a bad thing. At the end it was a very solid thriller and I liked it.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

MovieMasterEddyApr 7, 2016

When J.J. Abrams released Cloverfield in 2008, it arrived cloaked in secrecy. Now, some eight years later, the film’s so-called “blood relative” (Abrams’ term, not mine), comes with a similar marketing strategy. Going-in, viewers are unlikelyWhen J.J. Abrams released Cloverfield in 2008, it arrived cloaked in secrecy. Now, some eight years later, the film’s so-called “blood relative” (Abrams’ term, not mine), comes with a similar marketing strategy. Going-in, viewers are unlikely to be certain what to expect and, emerging, they might not be quite sure exactly what they witnessed. The problems with 10 Cloverfield Lane result from attempts to tie it, however tenuously, to the earlier movie. Take away the disappointing, disjointed, and anti-climactic final act, and this is an effective white-knuckle psychological thriller. And, although the final 15 minutes don’t ruin the movie, they detract from its better parts.

The premise is simple: following a car accident, Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) awakens to find herself chained to a wall in what appears to be a basement. She soon learns that she has been brought to this place by the hulking, rather scary Howard (John Goodman), for her “own good.” The basement is actually a doomsday bunker with three occupants: survivalist Howard; his former handyman, Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.); and Michelle, whom Howard rescued from her smashed car. In the outside world, all is not well. According to Howard, apocalyptic events have occurred. His plan is for the three of them to shelter in place and wait it out until things are safe. Michelle thinks he’s crazy. Emmett isn’t so certain.

By using double-bluffs and red herrings, director Dan Trachtenberg crafts a claustrophobic psychological thriller that hums along nicely. Hitchcockian misdirection abounds. From moment-to-moment we’re never quite sure who (or what) Howard really is: a lonely savior whose paranoia has been validated or a creepy kidnapper acting out a twisted delusion? Is the situation outside the bunker real or a figment of Howard’s warped mind? Did “the Ruskies” attack? Or aliens? Or nothing at all? Perhaps Howard faked the mutilations of some pigs to “prove” that the air isn’t safe? So many questions… At times, 10 Cloverfield Lane has a similar vibe as the TV series Lost which, not coincidentally, was produced by Abrams’ Bad Robot Productions.

While keeping us guessing, 10 Cloverfield Lane provides several nail-biting scenes. Sound is an important part of how the tension is amplified - every noise is loud and the insistent musical score throbs. 10 Cloverfield Lane doesn’t employ “found footage” like the original Cloverfield. Camera movement is smooth and clean and the shots are composed to emphasize how cramped and uncomfortable the limited space is. The movie is presented from Michelle’s perspective and its tone varies with her mood. Her opinion of Howard and the situation changes frequently and the film reflects that. There’s even a goofy musical montage that shows the three companions playing board games and putting together puzzles like any “normal” family.

Winstead is a good choice to play the heroine because she’s strong yet feminine. (She previously appeared as Bruce Willis’ daughter in the fourth Die Hard film and as the lead in the prequel to John Carptenter’s The Thing.) John Goodman is a perfect Howard - Goodman has the rare talent of being able to play both a cuddly, likeable guy and a frighteningly dangerous one. In 10 Cloverfield Lane, he’s asked to do both.

The film’s failing is that, in linking it to Cloverfield, it abandons the elements that made the majority of the movie effective. The final fifteen minutes don’t work as a way to wrap up this story or as an introduction to a larger (generic) canvas. They feel tacked-on and rushed. Nevertheless, as weak as the conclusion may be, it doesn’t obfuscate the good things to precede it. 10 Cloverfield Lane is packed with suspense and tension and offers some of the best bait-and-switch work of any recent psychological thriller. It’s easy to forgive any missteps toward the end when considering the entire package.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Apr 6, 2016

A claustrophobic, bite-your-nail-to-the-quick thriller that ultimately redefines franchise film development. Sure, the specific narrative thrills are different from those of Matt Reeves' 2008 creature-feature predeccessor, but make no mistakeA claustrophobic, bite-your-nail-to-the-quick thriller that ultimately redefines franchise film development. Sure, the specific narrative thrills are different from those of Matt Reeves' 2008 creature-feature predeccessor, but make no mistake - this quasi-sequel's heart is just as black, if not darker than the film before it. Thanks in no small part to one of the most impressive directorial debuts in recent memory, a truly engrossing mystery at the center of all things, and what could quite feasibly be John Goodman's best onscreen role since "Walter Sobchak," "10 Cloverfield Lane" places yet another clear tick mark in the "W" column for producer J.J. Abrams… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

6

KPWarriorApr 4, 2016

The characters and plot are excellent. My mind swung one way then another trying to decide which way to interpret the clues as they unfolded. However once I saw the ending I felt a little deflated, a bit like having a Michelin star dinnerThe characters and plot are excellent. My mind swung one way then another trying to decide which way to interpret the clues as they unfolded. However once I saw the ending I felt a little deflated, a bit like having a Michelin star dinner with a last course of jam roly poly.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

SamanthamccoyApr 3, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is an intense and compelling movie that keeps you guessing til the very end. It is a psychological thriller with twists and turns at every corner. The claustrophobic setting is suspenseful and truly chilling. With a10 Cloverfield Lane is an intense and compelling movie that keeps you guessing til the very end. It is a psychological thriller with twists and turns at every corner. The claustrophobic setting is suspenseful and truly chilling. With a captivating performance by John Goodman that keeps you guessing if he is crazy or not. Lives up to all of its horror and Sci Fi, with surprises along the way, enough to keep you on the edge of your seat. Definitely an intriguing yet disturbing 2016 film. Solid story and tension built up throughout the film. Well directed and worth the money! Recommended for anyone that is looking for a modernized suspenseful thriller… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

9

DavidV293Apr 3, 2016

I love Sci-Fi Movies and this one can at least be on my top 3. From the beginning the movie already made me have goosebumbs because of how alone and creepy the movie felt. John Goodman plays a well character that will leave you scared of him.I love Sci-Fi Movies and this one can at least be on my top 3. From the beginning the movie already made me have goosebumbs because of how alone and creepy the movie felt. John Goodman plays a well character that will leave you scared of him. Loved how it feels like it's a two part movie, because we get the John Goodman psychotic house of terror and than we get the rest, which answers the whole movie. 10 Cloverfield Lane is well Acted and Directed.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

DukemangApr 2, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is a good Sci-Fi movie packed with a ton of mystery. It is nothing like the original Cloverfield, and that's completely perfect. You're left in suspense for a lot of the movie, but those moments really pay off when you see10 Cloverfield Lane is a good Sci-Fi movie packed with a ton of mystery. It is nothing like the original Cloverfield, and that's completely perfect. You're left in suspense for a lot of the movie, but those moments really pay off when you see the outcomes of what's being illustrated. A movie worth seeing to say the least!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

bigmackkApr 1, 2016

One of the best films ive seen in the past 5 years or so years. It felt like an extended amazingly well shot Twilight Zone episode. The performances really help make the film too. John Goodman is terrifying and MEW is a badass! The endingOne of the best films ive seen in the past 5 years or so years. It felt like an extended amazingly well shot Twilight Zone episode. The performances really help make the film too. John Goodman is terrifying and MEW is a badass! The ending helped cap it off and put its stamp as a "Cloververse" movie. The score is phenomenal as well!

Director Dan Trachtenberg is the next big thing, mark my words.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Filmcritic1956Apr 1, 2016

Ending was bad, switched genres. First 90% - psychological thriller. Last 10% - science fiction. Would have been so much better with an ending that matched the rest of the movie. Either the writers don't understand the concept of genre orEnding was bad, switched genres. First 90% - psychological thriller. Last 10% - science fiction. Would have been so much better with an ending that matched the rest of the movie. Either the writers don't understand the concept of genre or they're lazy.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

8

cjm868Apr 1, 2016

What a fantastic movie! 10 Cloverfield Lane delivers, big time. It is one of the best thrillers to come out of Hollywood in awhile.

This movie along with Ex_Machina are leading the charge in the reemergence of the slow burn HitchcockianWhat a fantastic movie! 10 Cloverfield Lane delivers, big time. It is one of the best thrillers to come out of Hollywood in awhile.

This movie along with Ex_Machina are leading the charge in the reemergence of the slow burn Hitchcockian thriller. It's great to see this kind of film to come back into the fore.

It gets very tense throughout the course of this movie. There is a brilliant scene at a dinner table where two characters laughing and joking around with one another ratchets up the tension instead of relieving you of it. How many movies can you say have done that?

All the performances are superb. There are lots and lots of closeups of a characters face and all of the actors (but mostly Mary Elizabeth Winstead), have to convey many thoughts and feelings to the audience with just their facial movements. The standout performance though is John Goodman's, he is a very nuanced character who's lumbering presence is felt even when he is not onscreen.

This is a top notch thriller, the kind I would like to see more of in the coming years. I also hope there is a third installment in this "case file" movie franchise, because: so far, so great!… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

4

jez1968Apr 1, 2016

Good tension and build up for the first 90 minutes of the film totally ruined by the last 15 minutes of nonsense when the writer clearly didn't have a clue how to end it and rushed a ridiculous ending which got sillier by the minute. FeltGood tension and build up for the first 90 minutes of the film totally ruined by the last 15 minutes of nonsense when the writer clearly didn't have a clue how to end it and rushed a ridiculous ending which got sillier by the minute. Felt like the writer had given up after that first 90 minutes and given it to his 5 year old child to make up the rest.… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

9

griffey546Apr 1, 2016

The movie was great and truly scary, and they made the character Howard (played by John Goodman) an actually scary character. Being in a claustrophobic environment the majority of the movie with tensions building up, it really does make forThe movie was great and truly scary, and they made the character Howard (played by John Goodman) an actually scary character. Being in a claustrophobic environment the majority of the movie with tensions building up, it really does make for a great horror film. My only problem is the ending to the movie. The end to the movie is just saying that, "yep, Howard was right about everything, and you probably should've stayed down there in the shelter". It's both a good ending to tie everything up, but at the same time just felt really rushed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Unladenswallow0Apr 1, 2016

If you like the flintstones and you likes cloverfield, then this is the movie for you. There isnt any shaky cam for the most part, and the acting is absolutely fantastic, especially from John Goodman. He plays the part of the average RedditorIf you like the flintstones and you likes cloverfield, then this is the movie for you. There isnt any shaky cam for the most part, and the acting is absolutely fantastic, especially from John Goodman. He plays the part of the average Redditor who has planned for the end of the world for the majority of his life. There was not a single moment in the entire film (Other than the abismal ending) that i was not glued to the screen. I was however a little disappointing that the bunker was not further underground. The poster made it seem like the thing was kilometers below the surface, but when i think of it that would have been overkill.

Over all i rate this film a 7/10. I take one point off for the missing jigsaw piece, one point off for not being able to see them complete the game of monopoly over the 3 years they were down there, and one point off for the alien vagina spaceship that combusted on contact with whiskey. Also i add one point for just being so much better than all the other crap that has come out recently. So actually its an 8/10.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

9

DoctorFilmMar 30, 2016

“10 Cloverfield Lane,” a sensationally effective semi-sequel that bears virtually no narrative or stylistic resemblance to its predecessor.

Marking a rock-solid feature debut for director Dan Trachtenberg and screenwriters Josh Campbell“10 Cloverfield Lane,” a sensationally effective semi-sequel that bears virtually no narrative or stylistic resemblance to its predecessor.

Marking a rock-solid feature debut for director Dan Trachtenberg and screenwriters Josh Campbell and Matthew Stuecken (both credited for the story along with “Whiplash” writer-director Damien Chazelle), “10 Cloverfield Lane” is the rare follow-up that wasn’t even conceived with the first movie in mind. Developed for Paramount’s now-defunct Insurge Pictures genre label under the working titles “The Cellar” and “Valencia,” the film initially told a self-contained story before it was ingeniously reverse-engineered into an offshoot of the “Cloverfield” universe, all done under the sort of secrecy we’ve come to expect from the imprimatur of J.J. Abrams. (He’s credited here as a producer, while three collaborators from the first “Cloverfield” — director Matt Reeves, writer Drew Goddard and producer Bryan Burk — are listed as executive producers.)

It’s a terribly clever marketing move that will likely maximize the commercial intake of a picture that cost less than $10 million to make (and whose conveniently number-forward title will ensure excellent placement in VOD queues). Still, the studio may court some blowback from die-hard fans of the original film (which grossed $170 million worldwide on a $25 million budget), who may well reject Trachtenberg’s movie as a cynical cash grab, or take issue with the fact that it was shot on a tripod. It’d be easy enough to concur, if not for the simple fact that “10 Cloverfield Lane” is vastly smarter and more satisfying than its predecessor; every cynical cash grab should turn out this good.

Trachtenberg and his cinematographer Jeff Cutter — whose camera navigates the space with effortless ease, even when it has to squeeze inside an air shaft or down a garbage chute — treat their solitary location as both a physical refuge and a psychological trap. The lengthy midsection of “10 Cloverfield Lane” is a work of expertly modulated unease that alternates between claustrophobic suspense and doomsday panic; it’s the rare thriller in which the horror of what might be out there seems less threatening than the possibility that there may be no horror at all. For although there is persuasive, even irrefutable evidence that a cataclysmic attack has indeed taken place, the movie never allows us to forget the possibility that Howard might be a paranoid, delusional psychopath — someone who just happened to have a fully stocked shelter ready to go in case the world decided to end.

That sense of menace stems less from the occasional contortions of the script than from Goodman’s terrifying, richly fleshed-out performance. A brilliant character actor who has been on a hot streak of late — he was a memorable gargoyle in “Inside Llewyn Davis,” and brought his boisterous comic gusto to bear on “Argo,” “The Gambler” and “Trumbo” — Goodman makes Howard a memorably complicated villain. Michelle and Emmett are indebted to the man for his resourcefulness and foresight, and there are moments when Howard drops his guard to reveal a glimpse of a more reasonable, even likable person beneath the clenched, controlling surface.

But those moments don’t last, and even Howard’s hospitality feels conditional, tinged with spite, entitlement and barely suppressed rage. The more Michelle comes to grasp the nature of his particular pathology, the more she comprehends her need to escape, even if it means confronting whatever might be waiting on the other side of the door. Winstead, a seasoned scream queen and one of the most undervalued leading ladies around, emphasizes the character’s quicksilver intelligence and refusal to give up no matter how bad things get (which is often very, very bad), and she gives the second half of “10 Cloverfield Lane” its thrilling momentum as Michelle takes matters into her own hands.

Gallagher, so good opposite Brie Larson in “Short Term 12,” at once varies and complicates the dynamic between the two leads, even if Emmett’s role is necessarily the least developed of the three. Still, the psychological grounding that Trachtenberg achieves here provide more-than-sufficient ballast for the harrowing final moments, which send the movie in an appreciably wilder, more unhinged direction; rarely has “out of the frying pan and into the fire” felt more apt as a description. It would be unfair to say more, or to note exactly how “10 Cloverfield Lane” connects with “Cloverfield” — a question that matters more from a branding perspective, anyway, than a dramatic one. By the end of this tense and unexpectedly human-scaled movie, all that high-concept disaster porn feels like even more of a distant memory.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

intruder313Mar 29, 2016

Predictable but very good indeed. Goodman is getting a lot of praise but Mary Elizabeth Winstead was even better. The real star though is the pacing and tension.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

8

WheelzFourReelzMar 29, 2016

Although I'm not sure how I feel about its ending, 10 Cloverfield Lane, as a whole, is a phenomenal film. The performances are great (especially from John Goodman), the claustrophobic atmosphere is chilling, and the tension is handled veryAlthough I'm not sure how I feel about its ending, 10 Cloverfield Lane, as a whole, is a phenomenal film. The performances are great (especially from John Goodman), the claustrophobic atmosphere is chilling, and the tension is handled very well. This is definitely a film not worth missing out on.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

CapnAwesomeMar 28, 2016

This film is nothing like the first Cloverfield film, but it is great on its own. The film does an excellent job of building up suspense and making the audience question the motives behind the main characters. There are a lot ofThis film is nothing like the first Cloverfield film, but it is great on its own. The film does an excellent job of building up suspense and making the audience question the motives behind the main characters. There are a lot of intentionally unanswered questions that leave you thinking about the movie for hours after. You don't even need to watch the first Cloverfield to enjoy this incredibly well-made movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

coloradosnowmanMar 28, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Movie about a girl stuck in a bunker with a creepy John Goodman, she escapes, and yes, there's aliens flying around, in case that didn't seem already obvious given the movie's name. I just don't see why this has been getting good reviews, the acting is meh, the story doesn't really go anywhere and reveal anything you didn't already know was coming, and worst of all, there wasn't any point to making or releasing this film. NOBODY, I mean nobody, was asking for a Cloverfield spin-off film.… Expand

5 of 32 users found this helpful527

All this user's reviews

10

busbfranMar 28, 2016

Dan Trachtenberg has done a great job at bringing the Cloverfield world alive again. Witty, cleaver and amazingly performed, 10 Cloverfield Lane is the best movie of 2016 so far.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

Aaron_PaplaskasMar 27, 2016

Aaron Paplaskas : This is a good movie with a solid performance by John Goodman. The movie slowly comes to a boil while keeping you in its grip to the very end.

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

9

DConroyMar 27, 2016

Small, claustrophobic setting and well told. You're constantly swerved between feeling Howard is genuine if not a bit nutty, and being downright psychopathic. You feel for Michelle that even knowing what may or may not be outside, itsSmall, claustrophobic setting and well told. You're constantly swerved between feeling Howard is genuine if not a bit nutty, and being downright psychopathic. You feel for Michelle that even knowing what may or may not be outside, its better than being trapped with Howard. John Goodman once again nails it. The guy is criminally underutilized as an actor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

oDjentoMar 27, 2016

John Goodman definitely gives one of his best performances of his life in 10 Cloverfield Lane. The film has incredible tension that flips back and forth all the way through the film and keeps you very engaged. Mary Elizabeth Winstead and JohnJohn Goodman definitely gives one of his best performances of his life in 10 Cloverfield Lane. The film has incredible tension that flips back and forth all the way through the film and keeps you very engaged. Mary Elizabeth Winstead and John Gallagher Jr play their parts well too and you can really get behind them, but it is John Goodman that will chill you to the bone and keep you guessing about where and when he is actually lying.
The film is also so different from Cloverfield which is a beautiful contrast: the full scale first person destruction with constant alien attacks and military involvement to a 3 person bunker based claustrophobic film that psychologically messes with you and is more subtle in what it does with the aliens being more of a backdrop for the film.
The script overall was written pretty well and cinematography is pretty decent too, but it is definitely Goodman’s performance which keeps the film afloat and interesting.
I must say, the ending portion of the film was pretty decent too until it got to a part which seemed totally out of place with the tone of the film, reminding me more of a scene from War of the Worlds; and then the final scene just seemed a bit cheesy and setting up for another sequel. However, I must say that with what they left the film on makes me kind of interested in seeing the sequel as it seems like the tone might be very different again.
10 Cloverfield is definitely a film to check out; it is creepy, well paced, tense and while at some points it may strain your believability (a shower curtain being able to cover a whole body?) the film is well written throughout.
7.2/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

sophiebennett52Mar 26, 2016

The first 3/4 of the movie was wonderful. It was dramatic and exciting. But, tragically, the last 1/4 of the movie was absolutely horrendous. The effects were terrible. It didnt seem original or like it fit the rest of the movie at all. IfThe first 3/4 of the movie was wonderful. It was dramatic and exciting. But, tragically, the last 1/4 of the movie was absolutely horrendous. The effects were terrible. It didnt seem original or like it fit the rest of the movie at all. If you're looking for a movie with a great build and a terrible ending filled with mediocre, unoriginal plot devices, then go ahead and drop $10 on this poorly done film… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

9

keemtMar 25, 2016

A great suspenseful movie. John Goodman's character was incredibly complex and well written/acted. I found every scene enjoyable and the film excels at giving just enough on the surface.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

rentalspace04Mar 25, 2016

It's well shot, well directed, well written and brilliantly acted. The twist ending is the only thing I've really heard anyone pick on and, to be far it's pretty abrupt, and I can totally understand someone not loving it, but it really workedIt's well shot, well directed, well written and brilliantly acted. The twist ending is the only thing I've really heard anyone pick on and, to be far it's pretty abrupt, and I can totally understand someone not loving it, but it really worked for me.
Other than that, linking it to the original Cloverfield in name only seems to be an odd choice (and it's certainly one that has upset people) but I think a Cloverfield anthology series is an amazing idea. At least in a couple of years when the next one inevitably comes out we'll know what to expect.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

KielyMar 24, 2016

Great performances, solid story and great tension built throughout the film, if only the ending was as good as the rest of the movie. If you have any free time definitely check this out in theatres

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

tpabMar 24, 2016

Just saw the movie and it was surprising, one of a kind, and odd. If you are planning to watch the movie and aren't sure whether its good or not don't waste your time because you cant explain it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

themovieguy123Mar 24, 2016

I was surprised how interesting this move was there was no time i was waiting for something to happen it always had some kind of tension there was something always on the line a good watch.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

ChesterCheetoMar 23, 2016

Can't wait 'til next one. This is the dark, gritty, and thoughtful movie you waited for. I like the dark DC and kid friendly Marvel. I'd hate if they made movies in the same style.

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

0

chicalisdMar 23, 2016

This is one of the worst movies I have seen in years. Can't beleive that some people are giving good reviews.

Don't waste your time and money, it is pretty bad. If you really see it, it doesn't make sense, the effects at the end are the worst.

6 of 46 users found this helpful640

All this user's reviews

7

ReelViews94Mar 23, 2016

When J.J. Abrams released Cloverfield in 2008, it arrived cloaked in secrecy. Now, some eight years later, the film’s so-called “blood relative” (Abrams’ term, not mine), comes with a similar marketing strategy. Going-in, viewers are unlikelyWhen J.J. Abrams released Cloverfield in 2008, it arrived cloaked in secrecy. Now, some eight years later, the film’s so-called “blood relative” (Abrams’ term, not mine), comes with a similar marketing strategy. Going-in, viewers are unlikely to be certain what to expect and, emerging, they might not be quite sure exactly what they witnessed. The problems with 10 Cloverfield Lane result from attempts to tie it, however tenuously, to the earlier movie. Take away the disappointing, disjointed, and anti-climactic final act, and this is an effective white-knuckle psychological thriller. And, although the final 15 minutes don’t ruin the movie, they detract from its better parts.

The premise is simple: following a car accident, Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) awakens to find herself chained to a wall in what appears to be a basement. She soon learns that she has been brought to this place by the hulking, rather scary Howard (John Goodman), for her “own good.” The basement is actually a doomsday bunker with three occupants: survivalist Howard; his former handyman, Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.); and Michelle, whom Howard rescued from her smashed car. In the outside world, all is not well. According to Howard, apocalyptic events have occurred. His plan is for the three of them to shelter in place and wait it out until things are safe. Michelle thinks he’s crazy. Emmett isn’t so certain.

By using double-bluffs and red herrings, director Dan Trachtenberg crafts a claustrophobic psychological thriller that hums along nicely. Hitchcockian misdirection abounds. From moment-to-moment we’re never quite sure who (or what) Howard really is: a lonely savior whose paranoia has been validated or a creepy kidnapper acting out a twisted delusion? Is the situation outside the bunker real or a figment of Howard’s warped mind? Did “the Ruskies” attack? Or aliens? Or nothing at all? Perhaps Howard faked the mutilations of some pigs to “prove” that the air isn’t safe? So many questions… At times, 10 Cloverfield Lane has a similar vibe as the TV series Lost which, not coincidentally, was produced by Abrams’ Bad Robot Productions.

While keeping us guessing, 10 Cloverfield Lane provides several nail-biting scenes. Sound is an important part of how the tension is amplified - every noise is loud and the insistent musical score throbs. 10 Cloverfield Lane doesn’t employ “found footage” like the original Cloverfield. Camera movement is smooth and clean and the shots are composed to emphasize how cramped and uncomfortable the limited space is. The movie is presented from Michelle’s perspective and its tone varies with her mood. Her opinion of Howard and the situation changes frequently and the film reflects that. There’s even a goofy musical montage that shows the three companions playing board games and putting together puzzles like any “normal” family.

Winstead is a good choice to play the heroine because she’s strong yet feminine. (She previously appeared as Bruce Willis’ daughter in the fourth Die Hard film and as the lead in the prequel to John Carptenter’s The Thing.) John Goodman is a perfect Howard - Goodman has the rare talent of being able to play both a cuddly, likeable guy and a frighteningly dangerous one. In 10 Cloverfield Lane, he’s asked to do both.

The film’s failing is that, in linking it to Cloverfield, it abandons the elements that made the majority of the movie effective. The final fifteen minutes don’t work as a way to wrap up this story or as an introduction to a larger (generic) canvas. They feel tacked-on and rushed. Nevertheless, as weak as the conclusion may be, it doesn’t obfuscate the good things to precede it. 10 Cloverfield Lane is packed with suspense and tension and offers some of the best bait-and-switch work of any recent psychological thriller. It’s easy to forgive any missteps toward the end when considering the entire package.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TheFilmDoctorMar 22, 2016

When J.J. Abrams released Cloverfield in 2008, it arrived cloaked in secrecy. Now, some eight years later, the film’s so-called “blood relative” (Abrams’ term, not mine), comes with a similar marketing strategy. Going-in, viewers are unlikelyWhen J.J. Abrams released Cloverfield in 2008, it arrived cloaked in secrecy. Now, some eight years later, the film’s so-called “blood relative” (Abrams’ term, not mine), comes with a similar marketing strategy. Going-in, viewers are unlikely to be certain what to expect and, emerging, they might not be quite sure exactly what they witnessed. The problems with 10 Cloverfield Lane result from attempts to tie it, however tenuously, to the earlier movie. Take away the disappointing, disjointed, and anti-climactic final act, and this is an effective white-knuckle psychological thriller. And, although the final 15 minutes don’t ruin the movie, they detract from its better parts.

The premise is simple: following a car accident, Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) awakens to find herself chained to a wall in what appears to be a basement. She soon learns that she has been brought to this place by the hulking, rather scary Howard (John Goodman), for her “own good.” The basement is actually a doomsday bunker with three occupants: survivalist Howard; his former handyman, Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.); and Michelle, whom Howard rescued from her smashed car. In the outside world, all is not well. According to Howard, apocalyptic events have occurred. His plan is for the three of them to shelter in place and wait it out until things are safe. Michelle thinks he’s crazy. Emmett isn’t so certain.

By using double-bluffs and red herrings, director Dan Trachtenberg crafts a claustrophobic psychological thriller that hums along nicely. Hitchcockian misdirection abounds. From moment-to-moment we’re never quite sure who (or what) Howard really is: a lonely savior whose paranoia has been validated or a creepy kidnapper acting out a twisted delusion? Is the situation outside the bunker real or a figment of Howard’s warped mind? Did “the Ruskies” attack? Or aliens? Or nothing at all? Perhaps Howard faked the mutilations of some pigs to “prove” that the air isn’t safe? So many questions… At times, 10 Cloverfield Lane has a similar vibe as the TV series Lost which, not coincidentally, was produced by Abrams’ Bad Robot Productions.

While keeping us guessing, 10 Cloverfield Lane provides several nail-biting scenes. Sound is an important part of how the tension is amplified - every noise is loud and the insistent musical score throbs. 10 Cloverfield Lane doesn’t employ “found footage” like the original Cloverfield. Camera movement is smooth and clean and the shots are composed to emphasize how cramped and uncomfortable the limited space is. The movie is presented from Michelle’s perspective and its tone varies with her mood. Her opinion of Howard and the situation changes frequently and the film reflects that. There’s even a goofy musical montage that shows the three companions playing board games and putting together puzzles like any “normal” family.

Winstead is a good choice to play the heroine because she’s strong yet feminine. (She previously appeared as Bruce Willis’ daughter in the fourth Die Hard film and as the lead in the prequel to John Carptenter’s The Thing.) John Goodman is a perfect Howard - Goodman has the rare talent of being able to play both a cuddly, likeable guy and a frighteningly dangerous one. In 10 Cloverfield Lane, he’s asked to do both.

The film’s failing is that, in linking it to Cloverfield, it abandons the elements that made the majority of the movie effective. The final fifteen minutes don’t work as a way to wrap up this story or as an introduction to a larger (generic) canvas. They feel tacked-on and rushed. Nevertheless, as weak as the conclusion may be, it doesn’t obfuscate the good things to precede it. 10 Cloverfield Lane is packed with suspense and tension and offers some of the best bait-and-switch work of any recent psychological thriller. It’s easy to forgive any missteps toward the end when considering the entire package.… Expand

5 of 5 users found this helpful50

All this user's reviews

4

doodlermanMar 22, 2016

It's the kind of movie that's been made a thousand times, but this time in tight quarters, feigning originality. I wanted to love this movie, but I may have been too bound to my original expectations. I expected something much more seriousIt's the kind of movie that's been made a thousand times, but this time in tight quarters, feigning originality. I wanted to love this movie, but I may have been too bound to my original expectations. I expected something much more serious and tensely paced. This movie is cliched ridiculousness. It's done better than most cliched ridiculousness, sure, but it devolves into something so stupid that it can't be forgiven.

John Goodman is good, but not particularly menacing. I guess I have my perceptions of him as a lovable big guy to blame for that, but for the duration of the film, I never felt threatened by him. The writing could be to blame, here. His character is almost immediately too obviously whacko. In his introduction, he doesn't immediately try explaining what's going on up in the world above, but instead makes cryptic statements that sound like he plans on doing horrible things. I know this is the writers' way of building suspense, but it lacks the subtlety to succeed in being suspenseful.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead is fantastic - her character is not. Or mostly not. The character arc is more forced than Sandra Bullock's in Gravity. It frustrates me when apocalyptic movies feature characters telling miscellaneous stories from their pasts as though it constitutes as full-fledged development. It doesn't. I want to see a character develop throughout a movie. Instead, her character's development remains on a steady plateau up until the ridiculous ending where her character takes a complete 180 after the climax. Without spoiling anything, I just want to say, the reveal is stupid. I laughed out loud it was so dumb. I was convinced the movie was trying to end humorously, but it was legitimately trying to be chilling with a reveal so generic.

I have a lot more I want to say about his movie, but only so much time. I might continue writing later.… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

8

foxgroveMar 22, 2016

Tenuously connected to 2008’s ‘Cloverfield’ but very much its own film, this is a superbly acted thriller which is edge of the seat stuff. A lot of the drama takes place in a bunker that is sheltering three people from an unknown outsideTenuously connected to 2008’s ‘Cloverfield’ but very much its own film, this is a superbly acted thriller which is edge of the seat stuff. A lot of the drama takes place in a bunker that is sheltering three people from an unknown outside terror which, according to the viewpoint of one of the three- Michelle, may not exist. The actors are great and the claustrophobic feel in the bunker is well utilised enabling the suspense and tension to build effectively. In fact, so good are the scenes within the bunker at questioning the motives of John Goodman's character that one almost forgets to consider whether the terror they are hiding from is real or not. Only when the action moves outside does one immediately guess what the truth of the situation is. The score and the terrific sound effectively jangle the nerves throughout contributing to a very impressive feature film debut by director Dan Trachtenberg. The ending leaves some room for a sequel which, in the event, could be as different from this film as this one is from ‘Cloverfield’.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

ReySkywalkerMar 20, 2016

This movie is the definition of a psychological thriller. Going into it expecting it to be like Cloverfield, I was waiting for the connection..waiting..still waiting.. No. This is its own movie. Damn was my heart beating hard. It is so great.This movie is the definition of a psychological thriller. Going into it expecting it to be like Cloverfield, I was waiting for the connection..waiting..still waiting.. No. This is its own movie. Damn was my heart beating hard. It is so great. Never a dull moment, had me at the edge of my seat the whole time, and seldom have I seen such developed characters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SpangleMar 20, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane is a very well-crafted and intense film, elevated by a fantastic performance from John Goodman. A mix of thriller, sci-fi, horror, and drama, 10 Cloverfield Lane also works in some moments of comedy to lighten an10 Cloverfield Lane is a very well-crafted and intense film, elevated by a fantastic performance from John Goodman. A mix of thriller, sci-fi, horror, and drama, 10 Cloverfield Lane also works in some moments of comedy to lighten an incredibly bleak mood. Director Dan Trachtenberg does a great job here creating tension and letting it build to a very good pay-off. As mentioned, Goodman is phenomenal with an intense and entirely gripping performance that plays very well into the air of mystery the film possesses. Mary Elizabeth Winstead is great here and John Gallagher Jr was also quite good. The film is a very compelling and thought-provoking one, lending itself greatly to further study as to character motivations and what all is really going on throughout the film. Some have criticized the ending, but I really am a fan. I thought it was a thrilling end to a thrilling film. Overall, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a very good film that has some filler and is not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, but it still a good thriller that really gets the gears in the brain turning.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

3

jrodfilmsMar 20, 2016

this movie could have been more of an episode for a tv show than an actual feature length film. not much happens except these three people are stuck in a bunker. its very boring and then some action happens but its so dark you cant seethis movie could have been more of an episode for a tv show than an actual feature length film. not much happens except these three people are stuck in a bunker. its very boring and then some action happens but its so dark you cant see anything. avoid this movie.… Expand

6 of 22 users found this helpful616

All this user's reviews

8

RobBob99Mar 20, 2016

John Goodman, Mary Elizabeth Winstead and first time director Dan Trachtenberg takes the audience on a heart pounding thrill ride that is 10 Cloverfield Lane. Never does this movie slow down, it constantly builds a daunt and claustrophobicJohn Goodman, Mary Elizabeth Winstead and first time director Dan Trachtenberg takes the audience on a heart pounding thrill ride that is 10 Cloverfield Lane. Never does this movie slow down, it constantly builds a daunt and claustrophobic atmosphere, that will leave you guessing what is actually happening until the very end that will most likely improve upon multiple viewings. So far, my favorite movie of 2016.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

5

yekimevolMar 20, 2016

Average movie, cast perform well and there is a decent thriller in there. However it should have not included the cloverfield name it added pressure and sees to have been added at the last minute adding a lot of weirdness to the movie.

4 of 12 users found this helpful48

All this user's reviews

7

BrianMcCriticMar 19, 2016

Three quarters of this film are extremely tension filled with some surprises along the way. The last quarter while interesting leaves me scratching my head in many ways. Overall this will definitely not be a forgotten film. B+

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

7

j1trainMar 19, 2016

It all feels too familiar but that doesn't keep it from being clever and enjoyable. The first act of 10 Cloverfield Lane feels a bit off, the actors can't quite match the absurdity of the script, but once the absurdity goes all out, the filmIt all feels too familiar but that doesn't keep it from being clever and enjoyable. The first act of 10 Cloverfield Lane feels a bit off, the actors can't quite match the absurdity of the script, but once the absurdity goes all out, the film settles into an anxious groove. The end is bonkers no doubt. Whether you enjoy the ending or not will depend on whether you like these "big reveal" sci-fi stunts or prefer the claustrophobia and tension of the psychological thriller that comes before it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Rebecca31Mar 18, 2016

Oh how I wanted this movie to be good, and it wasn't just good it's brilliant. Starring the fabulous John Goodman, Scott Pilgrim's girlfriend and some dude with a beard. The acting and atmosphere is simply amazing. Although not what youOh how I wanted this movie to be good, and it wasn't just good it's brilliant. Starring the fabulous John Goodman, Scott Pilgrim's girlfriend and some dude with a beard. The acting and atmosphere is simply amazing. Although not what you expect I'm calling it a monster movie, and it's a monster movie actually worth your time (looking at you Godzilla). Loved it from start to finish, gripping, shocking, intense, it's a definite recommendation. Seriously, get to a cinema and see this movie,… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

8

tjman09Mar 18, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane had a few appealing features, but didn’t seem as though it was poised to be as good as it was. Seeing the trailer the film looked odd, as it was a sequel to a found-footage disaster movie that was set in one location10 Cloverfield Lane had a few appealing features, but didn’t seem as though it was poised to be as good as it was. Seeing the trailer the film looked odd, as it was a sequel to a found-footage disaster movie that was set in one location amongst only 3 characters. 10 Cloverfield Lane is tensely confining, well-written, and takes the franchise in a totally different direction. That being said this film could have been great if it had not been part of the cloverfield franchise, however it also did well within that universe.

The film is very tense, similar to last year’s Room, in that it’s very confining and isolated. The film benefits from good performances all around, but most notably that of John Goodman who plays the sympathetic yet deranged Howard. Goodman’s cold yet soft performance helps build tension as the character clearly controls the situation, but is unpredictable and often erratic. With a brilliantly dark and somewhat nightmarish tone, the film plays out like a human version of mice in a rigged maze.

The story in the film is unpredictable and very well written, most likely due to the fact that “Whiplash” writer and director Damien Chazelle co-wrote the script. The story unfolds with one twist after another, with each twist bigger than the last, until the film builds into its climax perfectly. Another element that was very well done was the character development, as each character is well-rounded, and given a good arc. With a good story and great characters 10 Cloverfield Lane is a well-written sequel to Cloverfield, that even improves upon its predecessor.

One thing to note, while it may seem obvious, 10 Cloverfield Lane is very different from Cloverfield. Where Cloverfield was a found-footage disaster film with a huge scope, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a very confined traditionally shot thriller about people trapped in a bunker. That being said fans of the original may not be as fond of 10 Cloverfield Lane, whereas some who disliked Cloverfield may enjoy 10 Cloverfield Lane. However, they are very different films, with 10 Cloverfield Lane more focused on character development, and drama.
In the end, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a well crafted thriller, that delivers, mostly due to great writing. The film is very tense, well-acted, well-written,unpredictable, and very different from its predecessor in size and scope. The end result is a great film that is in many ways better than the original Cloverfield, because of the effort and care of the people making it. For those that love tense thrillers, or just in general great films, this film will surely entertain.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

trollkillerMar 18, 2016

John Goodmans performance is Oscar worthy and terrifying. The other leads hold their own in a suspenseful movie that keeps you guessing. Do NOT read any spoilers, but dont miss this film!

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

10

MovieBuff4Mar 17, 2016

Few films are as incredibly tense and utterly gut-wrenching as 10 Cloverfield Lane. Not only is it perfectly acted (specially by John Goodman), well written and impeccably directed, it is also extremely unpredictable and unsettling. It's theFew films are as incredibly tense and utterly gut-wrenching as 10 Cloverfield Lane. Not only is it perfectly acted (specially by John Goodman), well written and impeccably directed, it is also extremely unpredictable and unsettling. It's the most amazing film experience I've had in a while and most definitely the best film of 2016 so far.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

vanhaverMar 17, 2016

This movie is Misery w/ a Sci-Fi overtone. I loved every minute of it!! John Goodman was fantastic as always and the story will keep you on the edge of your seat from beginning to end. I really hope this movie does well...it deserves it.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

TVJerryMar 17, 2016

Let me just say up front: this film pays off. The scenario creates a big mystery, but the reality is worth the wait. A woman (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) wakes up from a car accident to find herself in a bunker. The host/capturer (John Goodman,Let me just say up front: this film pays off. The scenario creates a big mystery, but the reality is worth the wait. A woman (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) wakes up from a car accident to find herself in a bunker. The host/capturer (John Goodman, who's wonderfully creepy but still charming) tells her that the world above has been destroyed. She and the 3rd resident (John Gallagher Jr) struggle to cope with their new reality. First-time director Dan Trachtenberg knows how to manipulate the action with dynamic images (and snappy editing by Stefan Grube). He also provides plenty of ominous worry (with a slight mid-point slow-down). It's completely compelling and has just enough twists to keep it captivating and occasionally frightening. NOTE: Listen carefully to her boyfriend's voice on the cell phone. It's somebody famous!… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

moviecritic68Mar 16, 2016

I gave this movie a high rating in the class of Sci-fi suspense thriller only. It would by no means be nominated for film awards but as I have said before I try to score each film by it's ability to provide entertainment. This movieI gave this movie a high rating in the class of Sci-fi suspense thriller only. It would by no means be nominated for film awards but as I have said before I try to score each film by it's ability to provide entertainment. This movie delivers that plus adds twists & turns in the story to keep the audience thinking. Bottom line a fun movie to go see. John Goodman is a nice touch to the casting.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

grenouilleMar 16, 2016

The original Cloverfield film was my first introduction to found footage and I absolutely hated the film because of its use of that format so when I heard there would be a new Cloverfield film without the shaky cam I was very excited for theThe original Cloverfield film was my first introduction to found footage and I absolutely hated the film because of its use of that format so when I heard there would be a new Cloverfield film without the shaky cam I was very excited for the movie. Bad news for die-hard fans of the original, this film has absolutely nothing to do with the original movie.

Needless to say that fact hardly should tamper anyone's enjoyment of the film because it is great on its own merits. This is a film that skillfully uses tension to build into thunderclap moments that will absolutely make your mind reel. Hate how movies are full of exposition? Well here's a film that shows rather than tells you what's going on. Hate sappy character interactions and forced romance? None of that s*** here. These characters fully earn every moment and minus a few moments where I felt the film began to meander, I would say the depth of each character still kept me involved.

Overall, if 10 Cloverfield Lane is the start of a beautiful anthology of movies built by different people with new stories to tell in different ways, count me in for the long haul because I am absolutely done with both found footage and sequalitis.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

NickLikesMoviesMar 15, 2016

Consistently tense and superbly acted, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a thrilling and exciting time at the movies. The self-contained feel helps build suspense and drive characters in a very naturalistic manner, and provides some insane, unexpectedConsistently tense and superbly acted, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a thrilling and exciting time at the movies. The self-contained feel helps build suspense and drive characters in a very naturalistic manner, and provides some insane, unexpected twists. John Goodman is a gift from God.… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

10

dammanMar 15, 2016

Great move the action was spot on and I was on the edge of my chair. I loved these type of movies they keep you engaged and tricks you at the end. I wonder will they make a part 2? grab your popcorn and see this wonderful movie. Don't listenGreat move the action was spot on and I was on the edge of my chair. I loved these type of movies they keep you engaged and tricks you at the end. I wonder will they make a part 2? grab your popcorn and see this wonderful movie. Don't listen or read the trolls on this site they spoil everything.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

2

hotfromcauldronMar 15, 2016

Captivity is not always captivating. To be stuck in a “Room” can be a great “Misery” or a miserable waste of time. It depends on if the characters or conversations are engaging to even peek our interests or make us care about their ultimateCaptivity is not always captivating. To be stuck in a “Room” can be a great “Misery” or a miserable waste of time. It depends on if the characters or conversations are engaging to even peek our interests or make us care about their ultimate escape - as in the perfect Collector. Cloverfield (2) is a loud , boring , 90 minute teaser for Cloverfield (3). John Goodman is way over the top with a surprisingly monotonous performance - while his two ungrateful prisoners are plain dull people with too many regrets for their limited time on earth.
The only lucky one is the man who escaped marriage - “Ben”.… Expand

6 of 22 users found this helpful616

All this user's reviews

1

antoinedoinelMar 14, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I felt like I was watching a student film with a big budget. The film was over scored so heavily that it was clear they had no confidence in their technique. Never for a moment is there an ounce of subtext. The set up reminded me of Polanski's first film: Knife in the Water, but without the growing menace, because here it's all on the surface. So much potential to play with trust and mistrust, with the games you need to play to survive, with understanding who is telling the truth, all just kind of tossed out the window for plot points.… Expand

7 of 27 users found this helpful720

All this user's reviews

10

TheDude-Mar 14, 2016

one of the decade's best films "10 Clover-field Lane" is a non stop tension filled film with well written characters and fast paced storytelling.
A must see 10/10

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

9

RoseisayovoMar 14, 2016

10 Cloverfield Lane
With my head spinning, I regrouped in the restroom. (Also with a running time of almost two hours and a large diet coke I had to use it.) While at the sink washing my hands, I hear some teenagers talking about the film.10 Cloverfield Lane
With my head spinning, I regrouped in the restroom. (Also with a running time of almost two hours and a large diet coke I had to use it.) While at the sink washing my hands, I hear some teenagers talking about the film. “What’s the point?” I was aghast at that statement. Did we see the same movie? The slogan on the movie poster outside the theater was “Monsters come in many forms.” John Goodman’s character Howard is the monster. It became clear at the beginning of the movie that this was much more that a man prepping for doomsday. Michelle played by Mary Elizabeth Winstead is in a car accident and awakes in a bunker chained to the wall. Yet, a key scene happens at a gas station before. Howard’s truck pulls up at the pump behind Michelle’s car. Michelle feels uncomfortable and turns around to face the other way. Perhaps the bathroom teenager has never felt this. The knowledge of something not being right, the intuition of heightened alert was felt by me in the theater. In the bunker, Michelle meets Emmett. Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.) is wounded as well. The reason for his wound is far more suspicious. Emmett had helped Howard build the bunker. When Emmett knew the proverbial **** had hit the fan, he went to the bunker. He tells Michelle that he was injured when Howard was closing the door. Was Howard being cautious or intentionally trying to keep Emmett out? When Michelle first sees the bunker, Howard tells Michelle and Emmett not to touch. Michelle notices one night at dinner that Howard is becoming agitated with Emmett. Michelle, still trying to escape, notices Howard’s keys are on his belt loop. She begins to flirt with Emmett in order to send Howard into a rage. He threatens her by cornering her against the wall. During this moment Michelle takes the keys. She attempts to escape the bunker. While she is unlocking the doors, a woman runs up begging Michelle for mercy. It is clear to Michelle at that point that Howard’s claims of apocalyptic chaos are true. This is a turning point of Michelle beginning to accept her fate. As the film progresses in the bunker a pivotal scene takes place. The group is trying to avoid boredom by doing a puzzle. The puzzle is of a cat with a snorkel getting ready to enter a fish tank. Emmett is disappointed because there are pieces missing. This symbolism must have been missed by the teenager. The missing pieces, the containment of the fish while their predator is watching, and the cat’s breathing device are all significant. The puzzle pieces are Howard’s story. He keeps talking about his daughter. He gives Michelle her clothes. He has pictures of her and things by which to remember her. At one point, the air filtration device shuts off. Michelle is required to climb into the ducts and finds herself in an electrical room. There is a window in this room. Michelle discovers the word “help” scratched into the window. She also finds an earring which she recognizes from a photo of Howard’s daughter. Michelle realizes she has let her guard down and is indeed being watched by a predator. She confides in Emmett by showing him the photo of Howard’s daughter. Emmett tells Michelle that the photo is of a girl from his high school. He also says that she went missing and was never found. Michelle realizes what is going on; Howard built a bunker not for protection, but to capture and hold his prey. Michelle enlists Emmett’s help to get supplies so that she can try to get out of the bunker. She creates a gas mask out of a 2-liter bottle. Michelle refuses to accept her fate and begins her fight again. The teenager failed to realize that the “point” of the movie wasn’t doomsday it was Howard. Howard’s story isn’t fully developed on purpose. The viewer begins to ask questions and is kept in the dark like Michelle. The emotions that the viewer experiences during the film invoke the fear that is inherent of being human: not knowing the missing pieces of the puzzle of your predator.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

9

owmynose9000Mar 14, 2016

As a major fan of the original Cloverfield, I was very excited for the release of 10 Cloverfield Lane. This film successfully captured and reflected the feel of the original film in its mystery and universe but also managed to maintained aAs a major fan of the original Cloverfield, I was very excited for the release of 10 Cloverfield Lane. This film successfully captured and reflected the feel of the original film in its mystery and universe but also managed to maintained a unique quality throughout which was essential to its success. The original Cloverfield was unique in its narrative but also its style, this film does not follow similar but creates an experience of its own that does relate to Cloverfield but not enough to be called a direct continuation of the story told between both films. The comparisons really end at the overall post-apocalyptic event that 10 Cloverfield Lane also contains but really the significance of this film is drawn from the more contained subplot. 10 Cloverfield Lane’s three main characters exist within a more personal story that was very reminiscent of Lost as it contained a similar ominous feel throughout, a trait J.J Abrahams has become known for in his narrative structure. Bear McCreary’s soundtrack complimented the suspense of the film, fitting perfectly with the almost sci-fi nature of the drama that unfolds. The music was reminiscent of McCreary’s music on Battlestar Galactica, also a work of sci-fi and reflected a similar eerie apocalyptic overtone. The film’s scale is important to consider because there is so much potential in the universe it ultimately creates, and yet a continuation may only lead to a more generic story. Regardless of what comes next, 10 Cloverfield Lane was an experience that was unique in its drama and genre; a must-see film with an excellent story and even more interesting universe.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

thethetheMar 14, 2016

Really really good movie that is tense, disturbing, frightening, yet also charming. My only issue is the ending but if you erase the last 10 minutes of the movie from your memory, it is a perfect suspenseful movie.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

QuietGiantMar 13, 2016

A master class in tension. Its ability to switch tone on a dime and make you second guess your preconceptions is impressive. A standout performance by Mr. Goodman that is sure to draw at least a nomination.

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

8

treki999Mar 13, 2016

Do not tie this movie to Cloverfield. Even though, this movie is from the same period after the original events went down, the movie is good all by itself. I went expecting pieces (creatures, characters, storylines, etc.) from the originalDo not tie this movie to Cloverfield. Even though, this movie is from the same period after the original events went down, the movie is good all by itself. I went expecting pieces (creatures, characters, storylines, etc.) from the original movie so I was disappointed in that. I did get my screams and creatures. It is just different.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

1

roscoeswaffleMar 13, 2016

John Goodman enters the Cloverfield universe and...pffffft....lets all the air out.
The only reason to see 10 C L is either:
- you'll pay to watch anything JG is in, or - morbid curiosity, for how an entire 146 minutes can be completelyJohn Goodman enters the Cloverfield universe and...pffffft....lets all the air out.
The only reason to see 10 C L is either:
- you'll pay to watch anything JG is in, or
- morbid curiosity, for how an entire 146 minutes can be completely devoid of a single original idea or line of dialogue
I loved the first Cloverfield, but this one: boo, hiss. (And no surprise at all that the Dome--the Dome!--was nearly empty for a Sunday evening showing two days--two days!!--after the Friday release.)… Expand

5 of 29 users found this helpful524

All this user's reviews

5

GinaKMar 13, 2016

I found 10 Cloverfield Lane to be a major disappointment. Rod Serling’s Twilight Zone knew how to create paranoia in a small space, but not this film. I just got a new watch, which allows me to see the time in the dark, and I consulted it atI found 10 Cloverfield Lane to be a major disappointment. Rod Serling’s Twilight Zone knew how to create paranoia in a small space, but not this film. I just got a new watch, which allows me to see the time in the dark, and I consulted it at least three times during the first 90 minutes of this film, which seemed to take forever. I really didn’t care about the characters or their situation or what they ate or the board (bored) games they played. However, I did agree with some of the User Reviews I read – the last 15 minutes are great fun. My advice is to wait until it turns up on cable so you can fast forward over the first 90 minutes or tune in for the last 15.… Expand

4 of 15 users found this helpful411

All this user's reviews

5

sapient254Mar 12, 2016

This was a movie that had so much potential, but fell flat in the end. The characters are all fantastic and there is a constant sense of unease and curiosity that you feel throughout the movie, yet it all comes crashing down in the last 10-15This was a movie that had so much potential, but fell flat in the end. The characters are all fantastic and there is a constant sense of unease and curiosity that you feel throughout the movie, yet it all comes crashing down in the last 10-15 minutes. I almost feel cheated out of experiencing what could have been a fantastically suspenseful film.

The Good:
- So much about what makes a movie suspenseful is not what you see, but what you don't see. There is a lot of mystery as to whether Goodman's character is just a crazy psychopath, or if he's just a bit of a weirdo that happens to be telling the truth about all the chaos going on outside the bunker.
-John Goodman truly stole the show here. He acted a character that, in one moment seemed to be a kind-hearted and caring person whom you felt compassion for, and in the next he was a raging psychopath which made you want to run and hide away in a corner for fear of your life.
-Mary Elizabeth Winstead's character, Michelle, was well thought out. She wasn't your typical damsel in distress, but she also wasn't your overly used super strong female lead either. She was a bit in between which I found to be more believable and refreshing.
-The cinematography and editing was done very well. The opening scene comes into mind here, in particular. You can't hear anything MIchelle is saying, but you know just about everything that is going on simply by the imagery being presented to you. A phone conversation in which Michelle is clearly upset, to the point of tears, leads to her walking out of the room with her things while the camera pans to a desk with keys and an engagement ring sitting on it. Nothing was spoken, yet you know what just transpired. I love that and wish more movies would take note.

The Bad:
-Throughout the film, Michelle and her supporting partner-in-crime, Emmett devised plans and schemes which, for the life of me, I could not understand why they didn't just do while Howard was asleep.
-They loved to talk so loudly to each other while devising their little escape plans. I felt as though all of these scenes should have had them whispering or writing notes to each other if they truly felt Howard was a threat to their safety and ability to escape the bunker.
-All of the above is nitpicking on an otherwise great film. What really had me cringing, however, was the awful ending to this movie. I felt as though it would have been a perfect movie if it weren't for the out-of-left-field moments being experienced in the final scenes. A good movie makes you think after it's over. A good movie makes you wonder what really happened to the characters. A good movie makes your imagination go crazy trying to answer all the questions it didn't. When a film like this relies so heavily on mystery and the unknown, only to suddenly show all at the very end, it takes away all of that post-movie-going-experience wonder that I enjoy so much.

It's one thing for it to happen to a bad movie, but when it happens to a good movie, it's truly heartbreaking.… Expand

5 of 15 users found this helpful510

All this user's reviews

9

francisrgoMar 12, 2016

So far the best film of 2016. The film is like an intense ride that keeps going. It keeps you at the edge of the seat waiting for moments and asking "What could possibly happen next?" The film mixes a slew of genre from scifi to horror toSo far the best film of 2016. The film is like an intense ride that keeps going. It keeps you at the edge of the seat waiting for moments and asking "What could possibly happen next?" The film mixes a slew of genre from scifi to horror to psychological thriller. John Goodman is at his peak and a defining role since Argo. Dan Trachtenberg is a new and promising director and delivered very well. Go see it and you won't be disappointed.… Expand

10 of 13 users found this helpful103

All this user's reviews

9

horcrux2007Mar 12, 2016

First, this isn't a sequel to Cloverfield nor does it take place in the same universe as Cloverfield, so if you go see this, don't get mad that the Clover monster isn't ripping through the city again. Now that that's out of the way, this isFirst, this isn't a sequel to Cloverfield nor does it take place in the same universe as Cloverfield, so if you go see this, don't get mad that the Clover monster isn't ripping through the city again. Now that that's out of the way, this is going to be a completely spoiler-free review, unless you don't want to know about, um, character names. But seriously, the less you know about this movie, the better, so I'm not going to give anything away that wasn't in any of the trailers. In 10 Cloverfield Lane, a woman, Michelle, gets in a car accident and wakes up in an underground bunker. Her captor, Howard claims to have saved her life and that everyone outside the bunker is dead. Another man is also in the bunker, named Emmet, and tensions arise between the three as Howard becomes increasingly suspicious, and Emmet and Michelle mount an escape plan. While Cloverfield, was an intense, in-your-face monster flick, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a completely different beast altogether. Instead of the vast area of New York City, this movie takes place in the confines of a doomsday bunker, so the scares come from paranoia and suspense than a giant monster attacking the city. All three cast members are excellent in their roles, especially John Goodman as Howard. His awesomely creepy performance makes this one of his most memorable roles. Mary Elizabeth Winstead and John Galleger Jr. are incredible as well. You may recognize her as Wendy from Final Destination 3. Winstead's character definitely isn't a damsel in destress here; Michelle is crafty and smart like Nancy from A Nightmare on Elm Street. John Galleger Jr. also provides some witty comic relief while also seeming a bit suspicious himself. 10 Cloverfield Lane is a restrained, suspenseful and well-crafted psychological thriller that calls to mind both Misery and The Twilight Zone, and if this anthology series continues, it'll be hard to match the standards set by this and its predecessor.… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

9

allisonjane65Mar 12, 2016

If you're planning on watching the movie, {and I thoroughly recommend you do} make sure you take your seat with an empty bladder! The tension builds brilliantly to the point where you don't want to be leaving the theatre for anything!If you're planning on watching the movie, {and I thoroughly recommend you do} make sure you take your seat with an empty bladder! The tension builds brilliantly to the point where you don't want to be leaving the theatre for anything!

Surely to be one of the best movies of 2016.… Expand

15 of 17 users found this helpful152

All this user's reviews

8

RvwFromUpHereMar 12, 2016

Who: John Goodman, Die Hard's daughter, Jim Harper, and Bradley Cooper's voice as Ben
What: A sequel to the best found footage movie of all time
Where: Dwight Schrute's basement When (Can I watch again): Whenever you need to be remindedWho: John Goodman, Die Hard's daughter, Jim Harper, and Bradley Cooper's voice as Ben
What: A sequel to the best found footage movie of all time
Where: Dwight Schrute's basement
When (Can I watch again): Whenever you need to be reminded J.J. Abrams is god
Why: This movie is basically Room, except it has Cloverfield Monsters. The one thing Room was truly missing… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

9

kirsten123Mar 11, 2016

I enjoyed the first Cloverfield movie for the most part, but the frenetic pacing and shaky camerawork made for an exhausting experience. 10 Cloverfield lane is a totally different experience for most of the movie, and to say much more wouldI enjoyed the first Cloverfield movie for the most part, but the frenetic pacing and shaky camerawork made for an exhausting experience. 10 Cloverfield lane is a totally different experience for most of the movie, and to say much more would be giving too much away. Just go and see it. I doubt you'll be disappointed.… Expand

14 of 18 users found this helpful144

All this user's reviews

8

JingerJakeMar 11, 2016

Outstanding!
Thrilling, chilling, unnerving, and uncomfortable. 10 Cloverfield Lane boasts an intriguing script, air-tight direction, haunting sound development, and is carried by a powerhouse performance from John Goodman. Goodman takes theOutstanding!
Thrilling, chilling, unnerving, and uncomfortable. 10 Cloverfield Lane boasts an intriguing script, air-tight direction, haunting sound development, and is carried by a powerhouse performance from John Goodman. Goodman takes the film above and beyond what it maybe should have been, delivering the well-written mix of nervous tension and entertaining comic relief. Nearly every moment, start to finish, is directly moving the story along while keeping the audience guessing at every turn. What I take away from the film in a negative light is that the climax cuts off a well-crafted tension that felt as if it had just gotten rolling. This is also, obviously, a huge respect for the craft. But perhaps the worst thing about this film is its title. Had the title been different and the relation to Abrams's former project of the same name been alluded, the film would have been much more rewarding in the end. I mean, this outing is an entirely different beast than its "blood relative." Connecting the relation before seeing the new outing only hinders the well-built mystery. I feel like Abrams should've thought that through. However, as it stands, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a highly entertaining thriller that crawls its way deep beneath the skin. Highly recommended and well-worth a big screen view.… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

8

ydnar4Mar 11, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "Produced by JJ Abrams" is generally all it takes to get my ass in a theater seat these days and I rushed in to see 10 Cloverfield Lane as quick as I could and I was not disappointed. We all know that this film really came out of nowhere a couple months ago when the film was revealed only 2 months before it came out.

Some people may find this film to be slow but I felt that it went by so fast. This film is 103 minutes and when it was over it felt like 50 minutes had past. Key men behind the first film returned as producers in Abrams, Drew Goddard and the director of the first film Matt Reeves. Rookie filmmaker Dan Trachtenberg deserves a pat on the back after a great debut and I'm sure we will be hearing that name again on some more big productions. The cast was so great! John Goodman is outstanding. I honestly feel like there is no one who could have pulled off the role of Howard the way he did. Its nice to see him in a mainstream film because he is such a talented guy and we don't seem to see as much of him anymore. Goodman's character is so mysterious and you really never know whether he's a good guy or a bad guy. I think that Mary Elizabeth Winstead did not reach Goodman's level but she was very good as well and is probably the best I have seen from her so far in her career. Then you have John Gallagher Jr. who was strong and likeable as well.

Most of this movie has a very independent feel through the first 2 acts and I was very fine with that and the first two acts are the high points of the film. With JJ involved it definitely feels similar to the "Hatch" in Lost which I love. There are so many tense moments where you are so engaged and I found myself attached to Winstead's character Michelle. You are really rooting for her the whole way through.

The third act took me out of the story just slightly when the monsters finally show up because it is just such a shift into a whole different type of danger. I still thought the monsters looked good and they were pretty scary while they were around. I recommend that this film be viewed in the theater just so you can get the experience of seeing the monsters on the big screen.

I was fine with the ending too, which was obviously a huge cliff hanger and as long as we get another movie I'm 100% fine with it. I would not rule out the fact that we are seeing another Cloverfield film that starts up right where the last one left off. I was not be shocked by an announcement of another movie before the end of 2016. I'll have my fingers crossed.… Expand

8 of 9 users found this helpful81

All this user's reviews

9

TheKavehJMar 11, 2016

If you like films that keep you on the edge of your seat and films that are action packed, 10 Cloverfield Lane is your type of movie. Based on these, and more, qualities and great acting from John Goodman, the film is one of the mostIf you like films that keep you on the edge of your seat and films that are action packed, 10 Cloverfield Lane is your type of movie. Based on these, and more, qualities and great acting from John Goodman, the film is one of the most enjoyable films in 2016 - So far.… Expand

7 of 8 users found this helpful71

All this user's reviews

7

GreatMartinMar 11, 2016

"10 Cloverfield Lane" is a mix of sci-fi, horror, psychological, suspenseful, damsel in distress thriller and survival movie. Fifteen of the last 25 minutes are some of the most tense times I have spent watching a movie. In addition the"10 Cloverfield Lane" is a mix of sci-fi, horror, psychological, suspenseful, damsel in distress thriller and survival movie. Fifteen of the last 25 minutes are some of the most tense times I have spent watching a movie. In addition the soundtrack music of Bear McCreary sometimes is annoying but at most times add to what is happening on the screen.

Most of the story asks if Howard (John Goodman) has really saved/rescued Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) or is he a psycho? Have aliens invaded earth making the air inhabitable or is Howard keeping Michelle and Emmett (John Gallagher, Jr.) prisoners for his own twisted reasons?

"10 Cloverfield Lane" is not as claustrophobic as "Room" was and certainly more well furnished not to mention more extended with many rooms for a lot more incidents to happen.

While the main theme is whether Goodman is crazy or not it really revolves around Winstead who has the audience on her side.

Though slow starting at first setting up the story those 15 minutes near the end are worth the wait!… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

10

JurassicParkFanMar 11, 2016

Wow! What can I say other than this movie completely exceeded even the highest of my expectations! Being such a huge fan of 2008's Cloverfield, I was certainly intrigued and looking forward to seeing just how much this film would expand uponWow! What can I say other than this movie completely exceeded even the highest of my expectations! Being such a huge fan of 2008's Cloverfield, I was certainly intrigued and looking forward to seeing just how much this film would expand upon that film in terms of the storyline or the monster. However, what I got from this film was definitely much more than I expected to get, and in a good way! The story, setting, atmosphere, etc was all so tense and mysterious from start to finish! Even the small, yet highly effective cast kept things plenty entertaining and interesting. Mary Elizabeth WInstead and John Gallagher Jr. both give solid performances, but holy hell brace yourself for John Goodman, who delivers such a menacing and chilling as hell performance, and undoubtedly his most memorable one in a long time!… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

10

moviefan22Mar 11, 2016

The film keeps you guessing till the end which is an awesome thing. Great acting all around particularly Mary Elizabeth Winstead! Loved it, highly entertaining!!!

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

7

GomaliMar 11, 2016

A decent film, I enjoyed it, but not as good as I expected it to be. A little bit gimmicky and in my opinion, basically stealing one scene from a decade old film.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

4

AnonJMar 11, 2016

No matter how "thrilling" or whatsoever it is, the plot simply just makes no sense from start to finish and leaves way too many unfilled holes here and there. Surely many thrillers aren't known for complex and well thought-of plots as much asNo matter how "thrilling" or whatsoever it is, the plot simply just makes no sense from start to finish and leaves way too many unfilled holes here and there. Surely many thrillers aren't known for complex and well thought-of plots as much as the detailed depictions. But really, even seeing it in that light it's still just much more nonsensical than most other thrillers. At least it's certainly not worth such high scores seen around here. How could a film be good if the very premise it stands on just couldn't hold at all, and much of what the characters have been doing is just inexplicable? Such plot flaws are just too glaring to be ignored and really ruin everything else in it. Also I really don't see much of a connection between this one and the original Cloverfield at all, the ending just literally came out of nowhere and is totally unrelated to the main story.… Expand

5 of 18 users found this helpful513

All this user's reviews

9

moviemitch96Mar 11, 2016

Wow! What can I say other than this movie completely exceeded even the highest of my expectations! Being such a huge fan of 2008's Cloverfield, I was certainly intrigued and looking forward to seeing just how much this film would expand uponWow! What can I say other than this movie completely exceeded even the highest of my expectations! Being such a huge fan of 2008's Cloverfield, I was certainly intrigued and looking forward to seeing just how much this film would expand upon that film in terms of the storyline or the monster. However, what I got from this film was definitely much more than I expected to get, and in a good way! The story, setting, atmosphere, etc was all so tense and mysterious from start to finish! Even the small, yet highly effective cast kept things plenty entertaining and interesting. Mary Elizabeth WInstead and John Gallagher Jr. both give solid performances, but holy hell brace yourself for John Goodman, who delivers such a menacing and chilling as hell performance, and undoubtedly his most memorable one in a long time! As for the story and its connection to Cloverfield, without giving anything away, the final twenty minutes or so should be enough to satisfy those who were dying to know if it ties in with that film in any way, but it's also effective in the sense that it can make the film stand out on its own really well too. Overall, this not only satisfied my cravings for more Cloverfield, but it also provided unexpectedly tense and suspenseful entertainment from start to finish!… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews