User Score
8.1

Generally favorable reviews- based on 32 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 25 out of 32
  2. Negative: 4 out of 32
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. BaronS.
    Jun 24, 2004
    7
    Voodoo Vince is a super little game. Although it doesn't do anything spectacularly new, it does everything so well, you don't really care. It's very playable, has possibly the best music I've ever heard in a game and I've never seen burlap cloth so convincingly put into game graphics. Oh, and it's genuinely funny at times too (unlike many games which attempt Voodoo Vince is a super little game. Although it doesn't do anything spectacularly new, it does everything so well, you don't really care. It's very playable, has possibly the best music I've ever heard in a game and I've never seen burlap cloth so convincingly put into game graphics. Oh, and it's genuinely funny at times too (unlike many games which attempt and fail on this front). Then again, that's down to a personal sense of humour. Wittering over, it's a great wee game and you should be able to pick it up for cheap. Expand
  2. MattC.
    Jan 25, 2004
    7
    With less and less 'gaming time' each week, Voodoo Vince brings a refreshing outlook to a bleak genre on the Xbox. The humour and easy to play combination makes for many a fun hour.

Awards & Rankings

81
63
#63 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2003
14
#14 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2003
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 38 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 38
  2. Negative: 1 out of 38
  1. Weekly Famitsu
    65
    6 / 7 / 6 / 7 - 26 [Vol 815; 30 July 2004]
  2. A lighthearted traipse through New Orleans's fancifully imagined heart of darkness.
  3. GMR Magazine
    70
    Some puzzles require a more elaborate death, but the concept could have been taken a step further. [Dec 2003, p.82]