- Publisher: Black Label Games
- Release Date: Sep 24, 2002
- Also On: PC, PlayStation 2
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
The game suffers from some repetitive missions with a lot of "fetch this and find that," plus many of the camera angles are finicky.
-
The game is also pretty short--somewhere in the neighborhood of 8-12 hours to finish, and your desire to replay it will likely be minimal. All of which doesn't sound good, but I enjoyed myself playing through this familiar story.
-
Official Xbox MagazineLOTR's slow-paced gameplay and mission-based structure seems more suited to an action RPG, but as an action adventure it doesn't quite measure up. [Dec 2002, p.137]
-
All of the pieces were in place, the story, the setting, the characters. All of that potential was wasted though because of lack of detail and poor control and A.I.
-
The die-hard Tolkien will get a kick out of slugging and spell-casting their way through the first book of the Rings trilogy, but the casual gamer will only be disappointed by an otherwise generic action / adventure title.
-
The game's lack of focus, sub-par AI, and unbalanced gameplay make the game mediocre at best.
-
Adequate but lackluster.
-
There is an initial rush and glimpse of Tolkien's novel in the early going. The ensuing action lacks punch and never arcs to a point to make any of the combat substantial.
-
Fails to delivery compelling gameplay.
-
There is a feeling of respect for the source material present in the Xbox Fellowship that is lacking in the PS2 version. Still, the heavily flawed combat drags this title down to a great degree, effectively making about half the game into more a chore than anything else.
-
GameNowWith a long-winded (yet basic) story and frustrating combat, the game just tends to drag on a little too much. [Dec 2002, p.63]
-
A big problem Ive had with the game is load times. You can walk across large plots of land with no slowdown whatsoever. But enter a house, and be prepared to sit for a while waiting for the game to load.
-
Ultimately an average game at its best and a frustrating and boring one at its worst. It's also exceedingly short.
-
netjakThe AI and combat was the first street to the road to nowhere. The second biggest flaw was the straight-edged linear gameplay.
-
This game is so bug-filled, I cant believe they had the audacity to retail this game in its present state of disarray.
-
What's disappointing is that Lord of the Rings is not really that great at getting you into the action.
Awards & Rankings
|
59
|
#59 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2002
|
|
15
|
#15 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2002
|
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 5 out of 16
-
Mixed: 7 out of 16
-
Negative: 4 out of 16
-
Mar 29, 2021
-
MattyH.Aug 13, 2003
-
CallumO.Dec 21, 2002This game is good for the people who want to have easy levels.