- Publisher: Activision
- Release Date: Jun 18, 2003
- Also On: PC
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 15 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 8 out of 15
-
Mixed: 1 out of 15
-
Negative: 6 out of 15
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
May 21, 2020
-
BradleyM.Jun 20, 2003The graphics are last generation...the multiplayer gameplay is a joke...in some courses your just basically looking at what might as well be shadows of your opponents...it will not system link.
-
-
XISMZEROJul 13, 2003It's like playing an N64 game - otherwise it's a bad port of a originally lousy game.
-
-
BlueFalconJul 30, 2005This is the worst 1st person shooter I've ever played. The graphics are very sub par, but it's also really simple and boring.
-
-
NedF.Aug 4, 2003The first level is CHOPPY what the hell, it is an xbox game. i expected it would run like a pentium III at least, no it is a 486 with 16mb of ram the graphics are pretty bad for a next gen console. the only good part is shooting off your opponents limbs thats it.
-
-
Aug 17, 2021Bottom of the bargain bin title. It's a pretty trash game, like all the Soldier of Fortune games, but at least it's a little better than Payback. It's about as generic as its cover art and most aspects of the game plain suck.
Awards & Rankings
|
53
|
#53 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2003
|
|
61
|
#61 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2003
|
-
It does lose points for omitting variety within its multiplayer setup.
-
GMR MagazineThe bad news is this: The game's graphics look dated. Most characters are blocky and reek of a poor PC port job. And Xbox Live support...needs an overhaul. [Aug 2003, p.74]
-
Xbox Nation MagazineThis is as stock and uninteresting as it gets, nothing more than the staple prescripted key/switch hunt you've already seen 100 times. [Aug 2003, p.77]