User Score
5.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 32 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 32
  2. Negative: 6 out of 32
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. MikeM.
    Nov 11, 2003
    5
    No real improvement over the last version of Medal of Honor.
  2. CharlesW.
    Nov 24, 2003
    7
    This game has amazing graphics...but on the other hand it's to short and there's not that much of an improvment from the last game.
  3. Bloodhawk
    Jan 10, 2004
    7
    better graphics but so many glitches and game flaws. you can literally pass it in one sitting if you felt so inclined.
  4. JoshM.
    Aug 17, 2004
    5
    The worst graphics for any game i've played not even worth the money. EA did better on the MOH PC games.
  5. MichaelR.
    Nov 10, 2007
    5
    Its a decent game and a great addition to a collection of WWII video games.Not mind blowing but it has its moments
  6. ErnestP.
    Nov 13, 2003
    6
    It is a cool game because you can play 2 players in game mode....but other then that it is just an Ok games....it is not worth spending the money on it.
  7. DanS.
    Nov 24, 2003
    6
    I loved MOH Frontline and was equally psyched for this one. Not only did this game take a long time to get into, but it was over before I blinked. THe shooting is not accurate (I.e. when you hit someone in the head, they don't drop). Save your money for Max Payne 2 if you want to play a FPS.
  8. LiamB.
    Nov 26, 2003
    7
    Way too short and easy.
  9. Apr 26, 2014
    6
    I loved this game back in the day, but going back on it, it was just an okay experience. The AI was good for its time, and the shooting mechanics brilliant, but the overall experience was mediocre. However, if we include the storyline in this equation, the game was oustanding.
  10. Jun 10, 2019
    5
    (2019 review) It's a semi-fun game that's enjoyable to revisit or to play for the first time if you're into retro gaming. The game is short (9 missions) but for me that was a plus. I didn't want the game to drag on too long because after a while killing people almost seems like a chore. The guns are inaccurate and the enemies take too many shots in order to be killed. Would have been(2019 review) It's a semi-fun game that's enjoyable to revisit or to play for the first time if you're into retro gaming. The game is short (9 missions) but for me that was a plus. I didn't want the game to drag on too long because after a while killing people almost seems like a chore. The guns are inaccurate and the enemies take too many shots in order to be killed. Would have been better if the whole game was close quarters because apparently if someone is 15 feet away you become an amateur with guns .
    Grenades are also a pain to use. They let you carry up to 20 which is nice but I didn't use them often because it was difficult to aim the throw and did a terrible job of killing the enemies most times.
    AI is dumb, of course. It's a 2003 game (over a decade and a half old) so one can't expect Uncharted level AI. Your teammates get in the way a lot and I would have preferred if they just weren't there.

    Overall for the game itself I give it a 5 even for back then. For going back and enjoying some retro gaming I give it a 6.
    Expand
  11. Nov 26, 2019
    7
    This was a fun game. Loved the story and how the collectibles unlocked interviews with war veterans that took part in the missions presented in the game. A good experience. The graphics are outdated these days, but who cares? Story and missions are cool, co-op is good as well. Nothing to hate here. Pickens approves.

Awards & Rankings

26
#26 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2003
47
#47 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2003
Metascore
65

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 23
  2. Negative: 2 out of 23
  1. Feels a bit like Michael Bay's Pearl Harbor in that an attempt to make an epic WWII Pacific Theater experience results in a product with brilliant touches mixed with mediocrity.
  2. Edge Magazine
    50
    On retreading the levels enemy attacks become predictable puppet shows, with mad-eyed soldiers lining up to get killed exactly where they did many times before. It's the kind of repetition more commonly associated with lightgun games these days. [Christmas 2003, p.109]
  3. You can, in practically one extended sitting, blow through the entirety of this dumbed-down, bloodless, sanitized version of America's hard-fought victory. [Dec/Jan 2004, p.88]