Metascore
65

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 23
  2. Negative: 2 out of 23
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Feels a bit like Michael Bay's Pearl Harbor in that an attempt to make an epic WWII Pacific Theater experience results in a product with brilliant touches mixed with mediocrity.
  2. It's fraught with lots of minor gameplay problems that eventually add up to one major headache. Rising Sun isn't completely without merit, since it comes packaged with some nice extra materials and mostly solid production values, but the weakness of the gameplay itself undermines what could have been a much more enjoyable experience.
  3. Whilst the strong presentation and authenticity is appealing, the overall result is a tired fps that suffers from fundamental flaws.
  4. Simply doesn’t deliver what Xbox’ers are used to in terms of a quality first-person shooter.
  5. Rising Sun begins in Pearl Harbor with a bang, but drags on to finish with a whimper.
  6. 60
    Extra grainy footage or not, and lame returns to the campaign to dig up cheat codes aside, this Medal of Honor experience is just good enough to romp through on a rental, should please fans of the series, but this is certainly not enough to justify a purchase.
  7. 60
    True-blue Medal of Honor fans will still enjoy Rising Sun’s cinematic style, respectful and historically accurate atmosphere, and heavily arcade feel. But for many, the game will feel too familiar in a fast-food way, lacking that old Medal of Honor magic.
  8. Quite simply, the game offers nothing that you can’t get in the other games, and can’t have a better time getting in the other games.
  9. Electronic Gaming Monthly
    53
    As for enemy behavior, it's so embarrassingly bad at times, it's hard not to laugh. [Jan 2004, p.122]
  10. Edge Magazine
    50
    On retreading the levels enemy attacks become predictable puppet shows, with mad-eyed soldiers lining up to get killed exactly where they did many times before. It's the kind of repetition more commonly associated with lightgun games these days. [Christmas 2003, p.109]
  11. TotalGames.net
    50
    Half-baked at best, parts of the game appear only half-finished, with sections of polygons not actually meeting, despicable clipping and some truly stone-age AI.
  12. If I were in EA management, I’d bash some heads to try and get the console branch of this franchise back on track, because frankly, it’s headed the way of the USS Arizona.
  13. I also have to wonder what part of the world Uncle Sam dug up my own squad mates. They could often be seen running in circles and constantly blocking my line of fire. At least they were resilient; one of the guys was turned into Swiss cheese by an enemy bayonet and shrugged it off like nothing happened. Tough guys…tough guys.

Awards & Rankings

26
#26 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2003
47
#47 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2003
User Score
5.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 32 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 32
  2. Negative: 6 out of 32
  1. Nov 26, 2019
    7
    This was a fun game. Loved the story and how the collectibles unlocked interviews with war veterans that took part in the missions presentedThis was a fun game. Loved the story and how the collectibles unlocked interviews with war veterans that took part in the missions presented in the game. A good experience. The graphics are outdated these days, but who cares? Story and missions are cool, co-op is good as well. Nothing to hate here. Pickens approves. Full Review »
  2. Jun 10, 2019
    5
    (2019 review) It's a semi-fun game that's enjoyable to revisit or to play for the first time if you're into retro gaming. The game is short(2019 review) It's a semi-fun game that's enjoyable to revisit or to play for the first time if you're into retro gaming. The game is short (9 missions) but for me that was a plus. I didn't want the game to drag on too long because after a while killing people almost seems like a chore. The guns are inaccurate and the enemies take too many shots in order to be killed. Would have been better if the whole game was close quarters because apparently if someone is 15 feet away you become an amateur with guns .
    Grenades are also a pain to use. They let you carry up to 20 which is nice but I didn't use them often because it was difficult to aim the throw and did a terrible job of killing the enemies most times.
    AI is dumb, of course. It's a 2003 game (over a decade and a half old) so one can't expect Uncharted level AI. Your teammates get in the way a lot and I would have preferred if they just weren't there.

    Overall for the game itself I give it a 5 even for back then. For going back and enjoying some retro gaming I give it a 6.
    Full Review »
  3. Dec 16, 2015
    0
    This game is trash. The A.I. is dumb, many of the enemies have stupid attacks (no really high ranking officer, running at the Americans with aThis game is trash. The A.I. is dumb, many of the enemies have stupid attacks (no really high ranking officer, running at the Americans with a sword raised above your head is a perfect strategy), the campaign is the generic "Japanese bad, Americans good" patriotic and more-than-slightly-racist bull**** and the game's pathetic attempts at "realism" only result in the game feeling more dated than a Ford Cortina. Oh, the controls can only be described as garbage and the level design is just abysmal.

    One of the worst games I have ever played, period.
    Full Review »