User Score
7.8

Generally favorable reviews- based on 23 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 23
  2. Negative: 4 out of 23
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Mar 13, 2021
    3
    These games are terible. They were bad 15 years age and are worse now.. Why do these games have fans. Controls are a joke, its repetative and boring, badly balanced, voice acting and animations, everything is provably bad, even by the standards of the time.. Did the people that like this game play, Ninja Gaiden, Baldurs Gate Fable , Mech assalt, Far cry insticts Otogi, , Halo, almostThese games are terible. They were bad 15 years age and are worse now.. Why do these games have fans. Controls are a joke, its repetative and boring, badly balanced, voice acting and animations, everything is provably bad, even by the standards of the time.. Did the people that like this game play, Ninja Gaiden, Baldurs Gate Fable , Mech assalt, Far cry insticts Otogi, , Halo, almost every other game on the Xbox put Hunter to shame, in every way. Expand
  2. Apr 4, 2017
    0
    Tape, tape sur les monstres, allez, allez ! quoi, t'en as déjà marre ? euh ouais !... Je peux sortir maintenant ?... parce que je sens que mon cerveau se transforme en beignet et ça me fait peur. Comme quoi les jeux de cérébrés, ça ne date pas d'hier, non, non.
  3. [Anonymous]
    Jul 13, 2002
    0
    This game sucked bad. It stole 4 painfully boring hours of my life.
  4. May 5, 2022
    3
    And they say there are no fake reviews. Judging by the dozens that were put up by people with the same comments in the same time period with the same nicknames, one can practically understand that the rating of the game is very high. In fact, this game is rubbish.

    My wife and I went through it completely, and we have never seen a more terrible cooperative game in our lives! A terrible
    And they say there are no fake reviews. Judging by the dozens that were put up by people with the same comments in the same time period with the same nicknames, one can practically understand that the rating of the game is very high. In fact, this game is rubbish.

    My wife and I went through it completely, and we have never seen a more terrible cooperative game in our lives! A terrible camera that binds one player to another, and even after the death (!!!) of one of the players, the camera decides not to let the other player in for another 15-20 seconds, which entails the death of the second player, the continuations are limited to more than one player, but on all at once, passing without support with treatment does not make any sense, the weapon is weak, there is no balance. Despite the good sound design and voice acting, the game looks terrible graphically, from the character models to the entourage, despite the fact that the levels are quite atmospheric. The bosses in the game are original, but the overall game design of the game is monotonous, overly complicated, and ugly.

    I don't know how the game got such high ratings from critics and users. Either they took a bribe, or in 2002 there were very low-quality standards. The first part of the series is a clear failure. I'm scared to imagine a GameCube version. Glory to Ukraine!
    Expand

Awards & Rankings

39
14
#14 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2002
28
#28 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2002
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 28 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 22 out of 28
  2. Negative: 1 out of 28
  1. Xbox Nation Magazine
    90
    Its difficulty curve progresses gracefully, its atmosphere is immersive, and its visceral punch is straight to the gut. [Summer 2002, p.80]
  2. The terrific visuals mixing with the well implemented sound effects and soundtrack make this game a real treat.
  3. I would have liked to see the game have a few more levels but there is enough there to keep me entertained.