Metascore
54

Mixed or average reviews - based on 35 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 35
  2. Negative: 10 out of 35
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. 72
    The meat (ahem) of the game is quite fun. It's the fist fights, the repetition, and camera problems that plague it enough to keep it from being more then average.
  2. This is not a game that anyone will accuse of vast depth. It revels in action-movie cliches, from Jack's nearly-constant bad puns ("This ought to heat things up," he says, grabbing a Molotov cocktail) to the near-invisible story to the waves of idiot cannon-fodder who populate each stage.
  3. 68
    Provides some mindless shooting with all of the clichéd elements you've come to expect from a third person action game.
  4. So if you like playing video games to release tension, and you don't care about good stories or online multiplayer modes or any of that stuff, definitely rent this one or something.
  5. It's more of an anti-expansion that removes more features than it supplements.
  6. This should've been more than just slightly better than the original. Rent it before buying at full price.
  7. Official Xbox Magazine
    63
    Dumb fistfighting sequences from the original are back. [June 2005, p.74]
  8. If you're hard up for an action-shooter then you might want to check this out when it hits the $20 bargain bin, but otherwise I'd have to recommend you skip this latest installment in the Jack Slate saga.
  9. Yahoo!
    60
    Much like Dante and "Devil May Cry 2," let's hope this is just a sophomore slump, and this series will come back stronger in a future installment. If not, it truly is dead to rights.
  10. The gameplay is still repetitive and uninspired, the graphics still weak and the storyline still overly cheesy.
  11. 60
    What seemed really cool back when Namco first announced the original Dead to Rights -- the sweet disarming animations -- just aren't enough to carry another repetitive action game for more than a few levels.
  12. However, if you're craving narrative depth, sound reasoning, and believable motivation to sit firmly behind your violent malevolence, you might want to hold off for something better.
  13. 60
    Unfortunately, Dead to Rights II maintains its predecessor's graphics and camera glitchiness.
  14. 60
    On the other hand, if all you want out of your video game is a bloody binge, Dead to Rights II is the gaming equivalent of sitting alone in a dark room and downing shot after shot of cheap, hard liquor. If you're in the mood, it gets the job done just fine.
  15. Unless you are an avid K9 unit fan, a glutton for mediocre shooters, or rich, your hard-earned dollars could be better spent elsewhere.
  16. Dead to Rights II doesn't exactly disappoint me, as the first installment was really no better, but I would've liked to see a more marked improvement after this development time.
  17. This is a game that has one virtue to call its own (i.e., highly redundant, brainless action in a single vein), but it lacks the sense of style and the production values that saved the first game from complete obscurity.
  18. A fairly simplistic game with a very basic premise: kill anything that gets in your way.
  19. The game has none of the style or effectiveness of other similar games and as I've said several times in this review, the whole thing smells of generic.
  20. Definitely a step backwards in the series. By removing the little mini-games and scrapping whatever parts of a story that were present, the latest title destroyed any credibility or potential it may have had.
  21. TotalGames.net
    52
    Dead To Rights II is confused. It's an action title where you spend the majority of your time waiting. It's a videogame where you'll out-swear the gritty characters onscreen. It's a sequel that's not as good as its predecessor.
  22. Game Informer
    50
    A lesson in what happens when there is an unwillingness to evolve or risk new ideas. [June 2005, p.126]
  23. Reminded me of any given recent Steven Seagal film. Yeah, you'll have your guilty pleasure with it and like some moments of its over-the-top violence, but it really feels like the same old thing, like the after-effects of a good idea gone rather sour in production.
User Score
7.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 5
  2. Negative: 0 out of 5
  1. Deviant
    Oct 2, 2005
    10
    Your all so critical, its so fun just slaughtering endless amounts of enemys, and the tension just melts away after a hard day, its kinda Your all so critical, its so fun just slaughtering endless amounts of enemys, and the tension just melts away after a hard day, its kinda like Painkiller or Serious Sam, only theres bullet time, ooo and a dog!!! :O Full Review »
  2. JeffreyN.
    May 22, 2005
    7
    This game was o.k. Better than Doom 3 though. Better graphics and awsome moves in this one. The first one was good but this one is too. This This game was o.k. Better than Doom 3 though. Better graphics and awsome moves in this one. The first one was good but this one is too. This game is very challenging. It is fun but it could be very frustrating. Full Review »
  3. BlueFalcon
    Apr 24, 2005
    5
    While the gameplay is similar to max payne, the quality isn't even close. The graphics are decent, but the gameplay is ultra repetitive While the gameplay is similar to max payne, the quality isn't even close. The graphics are decent, but the gameplay is ultra repetitive here. Also the enemies all look the same and are uber stupid. I really don't like the flow of the game either. All of a sudden you're stripped of all your gun weapons and forced into hand to hand combat. While the mild change is appreciated, it makes no sense to just suddenly have no weapons when you move into the next room. On the plus side, this does feel old school - just shooting 100s of mindless minions. I could probably play it through to the end if I was bored - there's some entertainment value here. Full Review »