Starfield

 Xbox Series X
User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 6232 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3,626 out of 6232
  2. Mixed: 488 out of 6232
  3. Negative: 2,118 out of 6232
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. GAMERDOE
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    It was overhyped tbh. But many updates later this game will be something special like how cyberpunk is now.
  2. MVS91
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    The game isn't bad, just dated. If they had released Starfield 10 years ago, I would say this game was groundbreaking. Nowadays compared to games of the same theme, it is not innovative.
  3. Homerdalors
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Il à 10 ans de retard et c'est un fallout dans l'espace, les mods vont augmenter la qualité de vie par la suite ce qui est dommage c'est que Bugthesda compte dessus :
    Les moins :
    -Pas de véhicules à part les vaisseaux et c'est chiant -Répétitivité des textures -Beaucoup de bugs mineurs, perso qui volent, textures, collisions, animations... -Synchro labiales inexistantes -Animation    Il à 10 ans de retard et c'est un fallout dans l'espace, les mods vont augmenter la qualité de vie par la suite ce qui est dommage c'est que Bugthesda compte dessus :
    Les moins :
    -Pas de véhicules à part les vaisseaux et c'est chiant
    -Répétitivité des textures
    -Beaucoup de bugs mineurs, perso qui volent, textures, collisions, animations...
    -Synchro labiales inexistantes
    -Animation faciale horrible
    -Répétitivité de tout
    -IA catastrophique
    -La pire interface que je n’ai jamais utilisé
    -Combat spéciaux compliqué à prendre en main
    -Absence de tuto certaines fonctionnalités se débloquent via la quête principale, sauf qu'elles auraient été utiles, beaucoup, beaucoup plus tôt
    -C'est beaucoup trop facile et augmenter la difficulté ne fais que rajouter des pv aux ennemis
    -Les visages qui restent fixe durant les dialogues
    -On peut avoir la meilleure armure du jeu dès le début du coup ça casse tout...
    -Rien est unique, vous pouvez trouver le vaisseau spécial d'une certaine quête, il sera craftable car aucune pièce n'est inédite
    -Système de compétences trop long, quand vous arrivez à peu prés au build voulu, vous avez finit le jeu du coup vous ne pouvez pas profiter de toutes les compétences...
    -Aucunes diversité de la faune et la flore, j'aurais aimé me sentir en danger sur une planète inconnue mais même à main nu vous peter tout sans forcer.
    -Vous armures / vêtements ont des stats qui ne servent a rien quasi imperceptible
    -L'oxygène est mal réparti, vous sprintez 100m c'est fini
    -On est vite limité en stockage et l'absence de tuto pour savoir ou quoi et comment faire est horrible
    -Sans exagérer 20% d'une session de jeu c'est du temps de chargement.
    -Au début avec le maximum de minutie et de précaution c'est IMPOSSIBLE de jouer discrètement.
    -Jet pack faiblard même en endgame
    -Quand vous faites quelques choses de mal (même sans le savoir) vos compagnons peuvent tout simplement faire la gueule et bloquer la quête, comme ça, sans raison
    -CAMERA DU VAISSEAU FIXE ! si vous en avez un gros vous ne voyez que la moitié...
    -Commandes du vaisseau Nulles
    -Pas de clavier AZERTY
    -Pas possible de régler la luminosité ni le fov
    -Pas de map, aucune, rien, les points d'intérêts sont tout le temps introuvables c'est horrible...
    -Pas de diversité, vos ennemis des spatiards de l'espace en combi rouge à 90% du temps, avec les mêmes armes...
    -Optimisation douteuse, 7800X3D, 7900XTX, DDR5, SSDgen4 1to... et je tombe à 60fps en ville en ultra ... c'est correct mais c'est dommage parce que la ville est vraiment moche.
    -Quelquefois on s'ennuie, parce que c’est vite redondant
    -Les dialogues sont mous à cause de cette cam fixe
    -On ne peut pas se mettre à couvert
    -Impossible d’aller sous l’eau, et si ça vous arrive d’une quelconque manière, vous perdrez des points de vies
    -Pas de recul des armes, manque de réalisme, pas d’impact et le côté rpg fait que vous avez des stats mais c’est hyper mal foutu…
    -Beaucoup de pompage sur no man sky
    -Des artefact, items, ou autre dont on ne sait tout simplement pas quoi en faire ?
    -Impossibilité de décoller et d’atterrir par nous-même donc le vaisseau sert uniquement dans l’espace.
    -Le modèle de sauvegarde, vous mourrez et rechargé la sauvegarde, ce qui ne donne pas vraiment de challenge, puisqu’au pire on perd 10 à 15 min de jeu, ça aurait été cool de se faire peter le vaisseau et d’avoir de vraies conséquences.
    -La prison, obligé de se faire arrêter pour lancer une quête qui selon moi est la mieux réussi du jeu…
    -On entend parler de pleins de trucs dans les dialogues, on n’en voit jamais la couleur…

    Pour les points positifs :
    -Des quêtes partout presque trop, dont beaucoup de Fedex mais ça reste du contenu...
    -Le scénario permet au joueur de se poser des questions, c'est ce que j'estime être un bon scénario
    -Densité de personne au m² élevé (moyennant une config pouvant le supporter)
    -De l'humour de temps en temps et des quêtes secondaire hyper intéressantes
    -Beaucoup de Lore, dur à comprendre, mais qui rajoute de la densité à l'univers
    -Le temps qui passe différemment suivant l'astre sur lequel on se trouve -Le fait de pouvoir faire tout ce que l'on veut passer la première heure -Des gravités réaliste -Quelques jump sacre -Du loot à foison -Des combiset tenues assez diversifiés -Des armes fun et multiples -Il y a des scènes, des références et des moments qui peuvent donner le sourire, comme la larme à l'œil -Une semaine après la sortie anticipée on compte déjà 881 mods sur Nexus et le modtool n'est même pas encore disponible, donc un très fort potentiel de modding qui va tout changer -Un mod multi aurait été incroyable -La construction d’avant post avec beaucoup d’éléments et beaucoup de possibilité -Beaucoup de possibilité dans les dialogues -La construction de vaisseau est sympa et satisfaisante    … Expand
  4. Httpalmeida
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Como fã da Bethesda, esse jogo tá o puro suco da Bethesda, quem não curtiu, provavelmente não jogou os outros títulos da empresa de fato, fazia tempo que não me divertia tanto jogando um jogo e Starfield tá fazendo eu me sentir como se fosse uma criança que sai da escola correndo para ir pra casa jogar, super recomendo!!
  5. DankrXL
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Where is space exploration? Summary, loading screens, planets are just like chapters of a semi-open linear game, ridiculous facial expressions. Anyway, something comparable with a low-quality fast food.
  6. x420Raptor
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    First of all, I'm sure there'll be people complaining & Metacritic responding to some of the obvious review bombing, but will they put the same amount of effort into questioning the disgusting, & blatant paid for "10/10s" by biased Xbox reviewers.

    The game isn't a 0, but it's not sniffing a 10 either. Anyone giving it those ratings is a disgrace, whether you're a user, or a so called    First of all, I'm sure there'll be people complaining & Metacritic responding to some of the obvious review bombing, but will they put the same amount of effort into questioning the disgusting, & blatant paid for "10/10s" by biased Xbox reviewers.

    The game isn't a 0, but it's not sniffing a 10 either. Anyone giving it those ratings is a disgrace, whether you're a user, or a so called critic. Review bombing goes both ways, & that overall score of 86 should actually be a 70-80.

    It's a good game, but does absolutely nothing groundbreaking & doesn't live up to the decade long development, the ridiculous levels of hype, or that we had to wait even long for a new TES.

    There's fun to be had with the game but it's not a GOTY contender by right when:
    - The console version is limited to 30FPS
    - Space exploration is extremely limited & the trailers/lead upto the game almost feel misleading to what we actually received.
    - The graphical fidelity is "ok", although maybe that's just other games setting new standards that Starfield doesn't live up to.
    - The core gameplay just isn't that interesting & it doesn't have that same "magic" that Skyrim had all those years ago.

    Starfield almost feels like a game that stayed in development too long & missed a window, because there are so many elements to the game that already feel dated, & there's not a single breakthrough, or ground-breaking element that makes you look at it as a shining example of "What can be".    … Expand
  7. Juras
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    I'm Sony fan. I can't play game yet because Phil deleted PS version and my PC is rather chip's ingredient than playing machine. So I asked my friend, Xbox fan and current SF player, he said 7/10.
  8. Ulriken
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    The controller is better than the game.
    I'll write more when I find more to write about.
  9. Haggy101
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Honest review. It's quite janky. You can walk through most of the game with melee weapon. The traversing may be the worst i have ever seen in a video game. Fly for hours and see literally nothing.
  10. HyphonGaming7
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Starfield a game that is somewhat suffering the same faith as CyberPunk77. This faith is the overhyping of big triple A games. Although it also suffers from bugs, subpar facial animation, and the questionable use of "open world" to describe it but that's just Bethesda. Now was this the game Xbox desperately needed and answer is yes. But is it the "game of the generation" as many fans callStarfield a game that is somewhat suffering the same faith as CyberPunk77. This faith is the overhyping of big triple A games. Although it also suffers from bugs, subpar facial animation, and the questionable use of "open world" to describe it but that's just Bethesda. Now was this the game Xbox desperately needed and answer is yes. But is it the "game of the generation" as many fans call it well no. The "game of the generation" for Xbox should of been Halo Infinite their greatest IP they failed. Overall Starfield is neither good or bad it's just sits in the middle.… Expand
  11. LanceCM
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    I was not excited for the game, but i tried it anyway because i played lot of Skyrim. This sadly is not close to Skyrim at space, its just boring go play side quest or do something else then main story. Pretty sad for the money. This game could be good Shooter game not rpg.
  12. Jeedash
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    It’s not a masterpiece, nor is it trash. Much like a lot of the reviews on Metacritic, Starfield is a bit all over the place. This is a big game with many interesting quests (including the main), good voice acting, decent combat and surprisingly few bugs. There’s also plenty to build and sink time into. But it’s hard to consider this an open-world experience given the compulsoryIt’s not a masterpiece, nor is it trash. Much like a lot of the reviews on Metacritic, Starfield is a bit all over the place. This is a big game with many interesting quests (including the main), good voice acting, decent combat and surprisingly few bugs. There’s also plenty to build and sink time into. But it’s hard to consider this an open-world experience given the compulsory fast-travel mechanic. And for the life of me, I can’t understand why the devs didn’t include drivable overland vehicles. This omission makes planetary exploration a chore.

    World design is mundane with most of the cities and planets devoid of visual character - I’ve yet to see anything that I’ve wanted to screenshot. I’ve also found the graphics quality to be inconsistent (XBOX) and much of it poor. The skill tree is limited, but I can begrudgingly live with that thanks to some other features the game throws at you. Do the positives outweigh the negatives? Yes. Certainly enough to keep me playing till an 8/10 game gets released.

    In a word: fine. You’ll get your money’s worth.    … Expand
  13. Confucius1735
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    This game is not one of the best which BGS ever made. But if you like they style and they original game design, you can be love this game. For me it's just "not bad game", because industry of game has more better example in that genres. 7/10
  14. Andre82
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Starts off too slow and too many loading screens for every thing you do. It’s a decent game at best, not my cup of tea. Carry on.
  15. GlennLimos
    Sep 10, 2023
    6
    I think it's a step forward when it comes to gameplay we saw in Fallout 4 and Skyrim. The space traversal ruins most of it for me, I've spent a **** of time in the menus and maps in this game. Everything with traveling with the ship feels so disjointed.

    Appart from everything ship related it's the best Bethesda game when it comes to gameplay, and it makes me look very much forward to ES6.
  16. azilgath
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    TLDR: Wait to buy this game when its on sale for $40 or less with all the DLC, it is definitely not worth the $70 or $100 for the special edition.

    Hardware Specs: CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X3D RAM: DDR 4 3200 GPU: Sapphire Pulse RX 7900 XTX I run this game at 4k on ultra settings with FSR and VSYNC off. Performance: 5/10: The performance of this game is mediocre even on good hardware,    TLDR: Wait to buy this game when its on sale for $40 or less with all the DLC, it is definitely not worth the $70 or $100 for the special edition.

    Hardware Specs:
    CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X3D
    RAM: DDR 4 3200
    GPU: Sapphire Pulse RX 7900 XTX

    I run this game at 4k on ultra settings with FSR and VSYNC off.

    Performance: 5/10:
    The performance of this game is mediocre even on good hardware, I get about 70fps average during gameplay, don't look at the reviews touting 100+ fps, they are including the loading screen fps in their averages. The game has frequent crashes to desktop, it seems it is crashing the AMD driver, as of this review, I am on the latest Adrenaline driver 23.9.1. When it is not crashing, performance is ok with minimal stuttering and loading screens are fairly quick.

    Graphics 6/10:
    - Textures are bland,
    - NPC models and facial expressions seem like a downgrade from Skyrim.
    - The lighting effects are good
    - Atmospherics are good
    - Water effects are dated.
    - Cities are well designed
    - Planets seem to be a quantity over quality approach

    Gameplay 7/10:
    - Gunplay has slightly improved over what was available in Fallout 4/76, enemies are bullet sponges though.
    - Melee is not as good as Skyrim.
    - Stealth feels like an afterthought in this game, and upgrades are locked behind grindy challenges
    - Speaking of grindy challenges: its tedious and annoying and must be in there only to artificially increase game playtime metrics.
    - Inventory management still has issues of previous Bethesda games
    - Ship building is fun, and you can definitely spend hours just customizing your ship, this seems kind of pointless though since you will spend hardly any time in your ship.
    - Loading screens for everything, its been how many years since Fallout 76 and they still cant do seamless areas?
    - You will end up fast traveling everywhere due to how annoying it is to use your ship for travel: Load screen to enter ship > cutscene to sit in captain's seat > cutscene to take off > load screen to enter orbit > cutscene to fly/jump to another planet/system > load screen for arrival to planet/system > load screen to land on planet > cut scene to land on planet > cutscene to leave captain's chair > load screen to leave ship.
    - Base building brings back bad memories of Fallout 4 outposts, but is improved.
    - Persuasion options are generic
    - Exploration is boring, there are around 5 points of interest per planet, and their is heavy asset reuse. this goes back to my quantity over quality comment. Would have preferred less more detailed planets akin to mass effect rather than 1000 boring ones.

    Story 6/10:
    - Majority of quests are either fetch quests or kill quests, would have liked to see more exploration quests since exploration was sold as a big part of the experience.
    - Main quest is pretty boring, I keep seeing other reviewers say "It gets better 20 hours in," if the story can't keep your interest in the first hour, there are major issues with it.

    In summary, I returned the special edition game, to pay $100 for a game that is using an iteration of Bethesda's dated, poorly optimized engine is not worth it.

    The game still has issues that have plagued the engine since Oblivion such as items randomly flying about if you get to close to them, to bodies clipping through items, to NPC pathing trouble.

    Overall, I will probably re-purchase this game when it is heavily discounted, and hopefully modders will have fixed the major issues with Starfield by then, which in my opinion, sheds a bad light on Bethesda that has supposedly been working on this for 20 years, seemingly having learned nothing from their past games. Disappointing to say the least.    … Expand
  17. Elboubou
    Sep 9, 2023
    7
    fantastic spaceship building, big re-playability, cool story, good side-quests, top musical score and solid sound design. inconsistent graphics ( from WOW ! to xbox 360 lvl), too many loadings and menu navigation.
    Lot of bugs, terrible npcs animations, poor AI, limited procedural generation. Not really an exploration Space Adventure game with unparalleled freedom as advertised, more a    fantastic spaceship building, big re-playability, cool story, good side-quests, top musical score and solid sound design. inconsistent graphics ( from WOW ! to xbox 360 lvl), too many loadings and menu navigation.
    Lot of bugs, terrible npcs animations, poor AI, limited procedural generation. Not really an exploration Space Adventure game with unparalleled freedom as advertised, more a shooter RPG with space in the background    … Expand
  18. Virus12345
    Sep 11, 2023
    5
    Amazing game!! Don’t listen to bad reviews from PlayStation players salty.
  19. Kavelry
    Sep 11, 2023
    7
    Starfield is basically fallout 4 in space with a better dialog system and better side quests. I hated fallout 4 but I really like starfield mainly because Bethesda went more back to their previous roots in rpg mechanics with this game then a more casual approach like they did in Fallout 4. The game is good and I have fun in Starfield and this game would have been an 8 for me. However, thisStarfield is basically fallout 4 in space with a better dialog system and better side quests. I hated fallout 4 but I really like starfield mainly because Bethesda went more back to their previous roots in rpg mechanics with this game then a more casual approach like they did in Fallout 4. The game is good and I have fun in Starfield and this game would have been an 8 for me. However, this game has had the same graphics, same bugs and same loading screens since skyrim. Bethesda made a good game but it's a game they made from the 360 Era. Final score 7/10.… Expand
  20. Patoplexx
    Sep 11, 2023
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Juego enorme, no es perfecto, pero tiene contenido y calidad para ser un referente del RPG durante los próximos años… Expand
  21. OldWorldBlues01
    Sep 11, 2023
    7
    This game feels like a singleplayer mmo, instead of a fully flashed out singleplayer experience you get:

    -Empty worlds with recycled content to grind -Fetch quest after fetch quest after fetch quest -30 fps cap, no performance mode -Braindead AI -Cities full of traders and other fetch quests with little boring stories added for flavour or go kill this/deliver this quests -Barely    This game feels like a singleplayer mmo, instead of a fully flashed out singleplayer experience you get:

    -Empty worlds with recycled content to grind
    -Fetch quest after fetch quest after fetch quest
    -30 fps cap, no performance mode
    -Braindead AI
    -Cities full of traders and other fetch quests with little boring stories added for flavour or go kill this/deliver this quests
    -Barely industry standard space combat
    -Non-existent space exploriation outside of occasional random encounter
    -Rooms upon rooms upon rooms filled with meaningless objects for your ocd friend to pick up
    -No enemy variation (90% of the enemies are human pirates)
    -Awful main story
    -Want to land? load screen. Want to enter a room? load screen. Want to go on a elevetor? load screen...
    -All the classic Bethesda title flaws(bugs,recycled content etc.)

    The only good things in the game are:

    -Ship building
    -Improved combat
    -Environment design
    -Some quests are actually worth playing

    If i boot up any of the old titles right now the game is fun and engaging from start to finish,
    they are filled to the brim with cool stories and adventures to experience, meanwhille in Starfield wherever i go there is someone that wants me to do some tedious busy work for them.
    They took their usual experience and decided to split it up in 100 planets (of the 1000) and added procedural generation to fill the gaps as a result the game is a slog if you play like you would do normally.

    Most of the critic reviews were probably bought, there is simply no way that this game manages to sit even remotely close to baldur's gate 3 score, do not trust the shills watch some gameplay and then make up your mind based on what you witness with your own eyes.

    To end my review, this game is just mid but if you really want to experience it regardless i highly suggest you only do the faction quests, it seems that's where all the effort went.    … Expand
  22. TexMexGaming
    Sep 9, 2023
    7
    It is a Bethesda game after all.

    Expectations were high for Starfield's release and it fall short on many counts. I'm not here to say the game is absolute dog water, but it isn't the greatest game to grace humanity like some Bethesda stans are acting. "1000 planets to explore! 999 of them are nothing but a rock, but we'll still use it as our selling point!" There shouldn't be a    It is a Bethesda game after all.

    Expectations were high for Starfield's release and it fall short on many counts. I'm not here to say the game is absolute dog water, but it isn't the greatest game to grace humanity like some Bethesda stans are acting.

    "1000 planets to explore! 999 of them are nothing but a rock, but we'll still use it as our selling point!"

    There shouldn't be a prerequisite to games that you need to complete hours of boring gameplay before you get to the good stuff. Space travel is next to non-existent. The "space travel" is really just a glorified load screen as it simply changes appearance and promots fast travel immediately.    … Expand
  23. FernanLdK
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    El error fue tener una expectativa alta, pero en pocas palabras el juego se disfruta, las misiones en lugares pre establecidos son excelentes pero la exploración de mundos deja mucho q desear.
  24. hyogom00
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Too outdated graphic engine, very crude animations and too many loading screens to be a game of the new generation. In terms of gameplay and content it is quite extensive and fun, but it has too many technical deficiencies
  25. Jobo3010
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    I was looking forward to this game being the reason owning an Xbox was more than playing older titles. I even had it pre-ordered until I saw the demo and Bethesda explain what kind of game they were making, so I canceled and would wait for it to go on sale or Gamepass. Luckily Microsoft's business model is geared towards its subscription service, so I got this game day 1 for a month atI was looking forward to this game being the reason owning an Xbox was more than playing older titles. I even had it pre-ordered until I saw the demo and Bethesda explain what kind of game they were making, so I canceled and would wait for it to go on sale or Gamepass. Luckily Microsoft's business model is geared towards its subscription service, so I got this game day 1 for a month at $17, and honestly it's not a bad deal considering how disappointing the game was. I've anyways enjoyed Bethesda games in the past, with wide vistas, an interactive world with deep lore and winding stories with a few narrative choices for the player, and a leveling system that helped build all the immersion. With Starfield you certainly get the wide open maps, a heavy amount of world building and lore, but everything else feels watered down. There's no improvement to the formula with this game, it really does feel like a 4k rework of Fallout 4 with a space themed expansion. Conversation chains are redundant beyond story interaction where you choose to talk, buy, or fight out of a situation. Besides the distracting and aged face modeling and reactions, you can upset an NPC so that they 'won't talk to you again' and then just start the conversation over and try a different choice path. Interaction with the world is limited to picking up things, hitting buttons, or talking to people (besides combat). For instance: in Fallout 4 you could find a dozen computers to hack or read through to piece together a mystery through pages of context and access secret areas all in a single dungeon. In Starfield you can wander an entire city finding a few consoles to interact with that look like menus out of a PS2 era RPG, with context delivered in a few sentences. That's kind of the game in a nutshell: you get a fraction of the effort spread over an exponentially larger and emptier world. Space exploration is little more than resource hunting and developing, as there is an outpost management game that's a grown up version of what's in Fallout 4, and instead of building a power suit, now you can build ships! But the ship building isn't very in depth right now without Bethesda stripping it's mod community for content thanks to its very anti-player user agreement. The space battles are fine and the only real new thing in the game, but they're mostly forgettable considering anything else in the market like Rebel Galaxy or Elite Dangerous. The lack of depth in ship development and modification also makes most space battles not only straight forward, but really repetitive, almost a copy and paste of the ground combat. Ground combat is next to awful. Gunplay is fine, feels like a smoothed out version of Fallout 4, but controls are still clunky at times. Despite the variety of weapons adding some spice to combat, it's generally ruined by the awful AI that moves at random or not at all, acting more often as spongy sitting ducks that occasionally shoot back and glue themselves to cover.

    The game looks great and there's plenty to look at, so I've found some fun there and in some of the side quests, but like everything else in the game it's all skin deep. Exposing a corrupt politician at the end of a storyline only to have him there in his office weeks later in game and talk to you like it was the first time meeting and nothing has happened... you see it constantly and it just shatters the illusion. Bethesda tried building a giant lake instead of a deep and interesting pool, but it's only a few feet deep at parts, and often it feels like a puddle.

    I'm glad I tried it on Gamepass because it's not terrible, I'm having some fun with it, but it is a massive letdown. I might try to finish the main story and hope it doesn't play out exactly like it seems, but I'm not holding my breath and I'll eventually get bored with this and leave it for good. There's just not enough here at the core of the game to come back to, so even a better story with actual characters wouldn't hide the bland undercoat here.    … Expand
  26. Maikadiel
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Um jogo nota 6, não mais que isso. Prometeu muito para o que trouxe, muitos loadings e bugs. Pouca exploração, personagens sem carisma e alma, onde faz com que você não ligue para a história do jogo. Alguns irão gostar, eu não gostei, por esses motivos minha nota é 6
  27. Critchy87
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    About 25 hours in and it’s a ok game def doesn’t live up to the hype. The side quests are decent, main story is mediocre, the ai is seriously dumb I mean they stack on top of each other for you to mow them down. The space combat is atrocious it’s like your a linear point in space and space just moves around you. You can’t land on a planet. The npc and their facial expressions lookAbout 25 hours in and it’s a ok game def doesn’t live up to the hype. The side quests are decent, main story is mediocre, the ai is seriously dumb I mean they stack on top of each other for you to mow them down. The space combat is atrocious it’s like your a linear point in space and space just moves around you. You can’t land on a planet. The npc and their facial expressions look laughable especially for next gen. I have yet to run into an alien with intelligence. This game should have been a 10 for as long as it was in development and it’s not even close to that. The only real great things about it are the ship building different weapons and side quests other than that it’s a boring overhyped game that I have to beat cause I bought the early access otherwise I can’t justify the purchase. Prob will pick up on pc once the moders make it a more exciting game till then it’s pretty boring.… Expand
  28. Pyroraptor23
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    I wasn't very excited for this game because it looked bland and slow with the same old art style on the same buggy engine but in space, so now 40-50 hours, trying almost everything i could, shipbuilding/combat, melee, sneaky build (that just doest work) etc. It hurt trying to level what i want, needing a skill point and a high number of things done for a challange (ie 40sneak attacks) justI wasn't very excited for this game because it looked bland and slow with the same old art style on the same buggy engine but in space, so now 40-50 hours, trying almost everything i could, shipbuilding/combat, melee, sneaky build (that just doest work) etc. It hurt trying to level what i want, needing a skill point and a high number of things done for a challange (ie 40sneak attacks) just to play how i wanted slowed done the whole experience, i went to some random lvl 70 planet to farm exp and challenges just to try make the game fun but how is it my job to try and make it fun?

    I hope patches come out soon to refine or change some things, stealth, npc interaction, skills, lockpicking. Either to make them easier or just work as intended.    … Expand
  29. Manson_fan25
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    I don’t know why I keep playing… I love the fallout games, the exploration is addictive but starfields constant loading screens, poor weight management, no vehicles for the size and need to loot planets, nor shortcuts in space travel really takes away the magic. The cities feel overwhelming but again loading screens to enter a empty and pointless shop again show that this is a very limitedI don’t know why I keep playing… I love the fallout games, the exploration is addictive but starfields constant loading screens, poor weight management, no vehicles for the size and need to loot planets, nor shortcuts in space travel really takes away the magic. The cities feel overwhelming but again loading screens to enter a empty and pointless shop again show that this is a very limited and dated game. Gunplay and space combat is clumsy and not enjoyable. AI gun combat is so dumb. NPC conversations are as robotic as a game 2 generations over. Where the game shines is simply the quest crafted areas (outside of the bounty quests which are usually repeated locations). The critic reviews were deluded or paid.… Expand
  30. tsukiyashinokis
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Dont know how to cancel rating cas I played on PC. But I do think XGP ruin great games.
  31. atomsk2k
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    I have logged hundreds of hours in fallout3 and skyrim. I played only 5 hours on starfield but from what i have seen it's a game that actually don't want to invest anymore time. There are no bugs because simply there are minimal changes to the game engine. The only big difference here is the space flight simulator mini game addition which off course you have to zone out/in to and theI have logged hundreds of hours in fallout3 and skyrim. I played only 5 hours on starfield but from what i have seen it's a game that actually don't want to invest anymore time. There are no bugs because simply there are minimal changes to the game engine. The only big difference here is the space flight simulator mini game addition which off course you have to zone out/in to and the reworks on the first person shooting system. That is all. Apart from those and a couple of lighting/filter tweaks, it feels like, for the most part, like playing a 2010 game. As i said i played those games and had enough, i was expecting for them to push the boundaries with this one but they choose the safe way, I choose to invest my time elsewhere. In my case 7/10 is the max i can give this game.… Expand
  32. HuanSon
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Just another unready game thats releasd to early. The fakt thats there is no release for ps5 is 1 point minus
  33. Levi55
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Das Spiel hat wirklich Potenzial, wurde aber nicht ausgenutzt. Ich hoffe das ändert sich mit Updates oder Mods. Was mich am meisten stört, sind die total doofen NPCs. Bsp: ich komme an ein streng bewachtes Gebäude, der Typ an der Tür sagt, ich habe hier nix zu suchen und soll mich verpisssen. Anschließend geh ich hinter ihm, klaue seinen Schlüssel und gehe vor seinen Augen in das GebäudeDas Spiel hat wirklich Potenzial, wurde aber nicht ausgenutzt. Ich hoffe das ändert sich mit Updates oder Mods. Was mich am meisten stört, sind die total doofen NPCs. Bsp: ich komme an ein streng bewachtes Gebäude, der Typ an der Tür sagt, ich habe hier nix zu suchen und soll mich verpisssen. Anschließend geh ich hinter ihm, klaue seinen Schlüssel und gehe vor seinen Augen in das Gebäude rein und er sagt garnix. Ich nehme alles mit was ich tragen kann und spaziere wieder raus und keinen interessiert es. Da geht die ganze Immersion dahin. Man nehme sich ein Beispiel an das über 20 Jahre alte Game Gothic
    Oder ich komm in ein Laden, töte den Security Typ und verprügle den Händler. 5 Sekunden später sprech ich ihn an und er sagt "Herzlich Willkommen..." so ein ****
    Die Gesichtstexturen find ich auch total schlimm, das könnte aber auch an meiner Grafikkarte liegen.    … Expand
  34. Crispywebb
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Though the game is entertaining, it definitely doesn't live up to all the hype its been getting. There's tons of loading screens, the space travel in ship just feels like an interactive loading screen, character model faces look very outdated & theres still alot of bugs/glitches to workout. Maybe in a couple years the modding community will be able to fix it.
  35. cowboyb57
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Excelente juego tienes todo lo que deseaste en un juego además los mundos abiertos
  36. ElAntiCristo09
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    it's a nice game but that's all
    Somebody once told me
    The world is gonna roll me I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed She was looking kind of dumb With her finger and her thumb In the shape of an "L" on her forehead Well, the years start coming And they don't stop coming Fed to the rules and I hit the ground running Didn't make sense not to live for fun Your brain gets smart, but your    it's a nice game but that's all
    Somebody once told me
    The world is gonna roll me
    I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed
    She was looking kind of dumb
    With her finger and her thumb
    In the shape of an "L" on her forehead
    Well, the years start coming
    And they don't stop coming
    Fed to the rules and I hit the ground running
    Didn't make sense not to live for fun
    Your brain gets smart, but your head gets dumb
    So much to do, so much to see
    So what's wrong with taking the back streets?
    You'll never know if you don't go
    You'll never shine if you don't glow    … Expand
  37. MADARA_TYR
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    I've played the game 20 hrs and completed the main quest i must say its so slow based and the movement is not good it feels like nerfgun its not that bad, but in 2023 the game can not get more than 5 points
  38. Murath
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Expect more from this game, the hype that was presented was very high which does not fulfill what was promised, graphics that are not next-gen, bad physics that are the same as fallout 4. It has some things that are fun but it is lost when Bugs are presented that break the immersion of the game.
  39. flie
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Formula bethesda de ser que não me agrada. A história até que é interessante, mas, com mecânica ultrapassada e chata. Pontos positivos:
    - som
    - história - gunplay
    - batalha de naves, mas,.....

    Pontos negativos:
    - limite de carga
    - loadings constantes
    - sistema venda
    - nas batalhas de naves não dá fugir/evitar
    - sistema estático das conversas. Os npcs parecem robôs sem emoções
  40. whoa_this
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Let me fly my ship around and land! Overall a bit bland when you dumb down the space travel aspect of the game.
  41. emrakul11
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    very bad gunplay, stupid IA and the exploration is boring and monotone, but the quests and main mission are intersting and fun to play, plus all the inmersion ot the typical bethesda game. Is not a **** game but neither the masterpiece who someone attempted to sell. It-s ust a good game
  42. Jiggawatts
    Sep 10, 2023
    5
    It's just astonishing how Bethesda managed to make the vastness of space feel soooo small. What a disappointment :(
  43. SydTheDog
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    It's not a bad game, but it does have it problems with framerate and textures, and some very dull quests, also the npcs are quite wooden and look like potato's, and it's not as free as you would like as you hit alot of invisible barriers, you can't even circumnavigate a planet and to many loading screens. It's fun for a while
  44. matt87
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Disappointing. Menu and loading screen simulator 2023. Finished main quest, don’t feel like playing it anymore… What the hell happened to Bethesda?
  45. aljirik1992
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    С каждым новым увиденным видеоматериалом, я иронично говорил: No Man's Sky 2 выглядит прекрасно. Hi-Fi Rush стала пьянящей эйфорией, REDFALL привёл в чувства размашистыми пощёчинами, и я хотел верить, что NMS от
    XBOX сразу выйдет нормальным проектом, который не будут допиливать годами, как то было с мечтой Мюррея.
    Отсутствие локализации не помешало мне погрузиться в личину очередного    С каждым новым увиденным видеоматериалом, я иронично говорил: No Man's Sky 2 выглядит прекрасно. Hi-Fi Rush стала пьянящей эйфорией, REDFALL привёл в чувства размашистыми пощёчинами, и я хотел верить, что NMS от
    XBOX сразу выйдет нормальным проектом, который не будут допиливать годами, как то было с мечтой Мюррея.
    Отсутствие локализации не помешало мне погрузиться в личину очередного космического проходимца, но мои сомнения на счёт того, что приключение станет для меня не таким же угарным, как прошлогодний High on Life, подтвердилось на все 100% и Starfield осталась для меня
    не в удел, как для игрока.

    NMS2… Тьфу ты! Звёздное очече — сбитый ролевой экшОнчик в космосе, что не возмутит вас, как то могла сделать Mass Effect 3 своими концовками, а подарит лёгкость блужданий по весьма живописным видам, не претендующим на новое слово в графике. Это прекрасная альтернатива No Man’s Sky в её последней ипостаси, но если брать во внимание её начальную форму, то это конечно космос товарищи. Не жлобите 10ку баксов на GP, даже без русиша, она стоит того, чтобы потупить внутри этой Вселенной пару деньков.    … Expand
  46. Soundrocketman
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    The games decent and enjoyable for what it. Although I was hoping Bethesda may have improved there formula by now. Its pretty much Fallout 4 in space and I feel like other games do the space stuff far better and couldn't help but wish they had put this time into the next elder scrolls instead of this.
  47. markleo
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Pros:
    Combat is better than Fallout 4 and Skyrim
    Cons:Everything else is worse apart from characters which remains the same (Below average)
  48. essjaydubya
    Sep 11, 2023
    5
    It’s fun, but it’s also a Bethesda game, so it’s broken. I came across a bug that has halted my progress and I’m not sure I wanna go all the way back and start the mission over. I might eventually, but for now, it’s hard to justify wasting my time with a busted game. A 5 is being generous because I did have fun for the 12 hours before that happened.
  49. MrBithead
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    Starfield no es un mal juego, de hecho es entretenido, pero a día de hoy queda lejos de ser un gran juego. No tiene sentido la exploración y , al final, todo se basa en ir del punto A al punto B como otros tantos juegos. Siento que perdieron una gran oportunidad para hacer algo increíble.
  50. Melodicdeathjaz
    Sep 9, 2023
    5
    Very meh. Some fun to be had, but it is mediocre. More of an rpg than Fallout 4, but somehow not as good. Xbox needed this to be an amazing game, but it isn't. If avowed is a horrible game, I'm selling my series x. This is ridiculous
  51. ClassikReviews
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    This game lacks substance, the direction, the thought is great but the execution is terrible. Put this potential gem back in the oven for another 2 more years and maybe they can flesh out some proper exploration game play.
    I know Xbox gamers are hungry for a smash hit but this just isn't it, however when you have been starved for so long, anything would be considered great.
    Critic    This game lacks substance, the direction, the thought is great but the execution is terrible. Put this potential gem back in the oven for another 2 more years and maybe they can flesh out some proper exploration game play.
    I know Xbox gamers are hungry for a smash hit but this just isn't it, however when you have been starved for so long, anything would be considered great.

    Critic score is misleading, User score reflects properly, and for the love of God Bethesda, retire the creation engine, its dated and the cracks are showing    … Expand
  52. Battlelord0
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    It's polished boredom. It's a massive game that A LOT of work went into it. This cannot be denied as it is a pretty setting with not a lot to do. Just because a lot of work went into, it doesn't mean that it is a great game automatically. Unfortunately, there are flaws that are not hidden, which really takes away from the score. Maybe my issues come from me being a bad video Gamer. I justIt's polished boredom. It's a massive game that A LOT of work went into it. This cannot be denied as it is a pretty setting with not a lot to do. Just because a lot of work went into, it doesn't mean that it is a great game automatically. Unfortunately, there are flaws that are not hidden, which really takes away from the score. Maybe my issues come from me being a bad video Gamer. I just did not have fun in the beginning stages of this game, and i'm not far enough along to adequatly judge how it ends. This game is perfect for game pass which allows you to try it out. I'm about to go back to a game I was playing already because Starfield hasn't captured my attention, but it may capture others.… Expand
  53. Ababykangaroo
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    This game is not nearly as bad as/ as good as console war warriors are claiming it to be.
    Xbox players wanted it to be there consoles saving grace to have their first new gen exclusive that is a critical success and ps fanboys wanted to **** on it to prove their console is gonna stay on top for this gen.
    In reality this game is average it does some stuff right, does some stuff horribly    This game is not nearly as bad as/ as good as console war warriors are claiming it to be.
    Xbox players wanted it to be there consoles saving grace to have their first new gen exclusive that is a critical success and ps fanboys wanted to **** on it to prove their console is gonna stay on top for this gen.

    In reality this game is average it does some stuff right, does some stuff horribly and the rest is mediocre filler content. If you really want to know whats good/bad from someone who is indifferent, here it is.

    The Good:
    Combat is cool/ varied weapons and boosting through shooting is fun
    Different equipment/stats makes for some cool builds
    Alot of missions/side mission to sink your time in
    Art style is cool
    Ship building is fun if you can digest the ui

    The bad:
    Horrible UI all over the game
    You spend about 30% of your gameplay time in menus (maybe 50% if u engage with crafting/ outpost building mechanics)
    Exploration is Instanced loading screen galore (and a lot of menus)
    Stupid encumbrance system
    Outdated graphics
    Bad Optimization

    The Average:
    Meh main story
    Many missions are either fetch quests or go kill someone
    Choices are either meaningless or has no real effect on story progress
    AI is just A without the I
    less bugs than Bethesda's history but still there    … Expand
  54. TheForest99
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    Limited,disappointing,sometimes boring,sometimes buggy.
    But,in the end its a great space rpg game from BETHESDA,not Microsoft not xbox not Phil Spencer
  55. AlanW41
    Sep 9, 2023
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. After 40 hours of play, I say it's worth buying, but not for this money. This game requires a lot of modifications. The game looks nice... but it's not open world as they said. You can't fly wherever you want, you can't land on the planet yourself...did I mention the loading screen at every step, you land loading, you go to the store loading, you change the city zone loading. The game has potential but all these loading screens make it lose its luster. After 2 hours of play I had enough and started No Man Sky as much as I could ;) I think I'll wait for some mods because I don't want to play anymore its to boring… Expand
  56. serges_3817
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    God of War Ragnarok es un excelente juego que sería perfecto de no ser por un par de defectos. Llevo 50 horas jugando al videojuego, terminé la historia principal y la mayoría del contenido secundario y en conclusión puedo decir que está al nivel del anterior, es superior en algunos aspectos pero en otros es inferior.

    Gráficos: 10 Si jugaste al GoW 2018 con la actualización de PS5 te    God of War Ragnarok es un excelente juego que sería perfecto de no ser por un par de defectos. Llevo 50 horas jugando al videojuego, terminé la historia principal y la mayoría del contenido secundario y en conclusión puedo decir que está al nivel del anterior, es superior en algunos aspectos pero en otros es inferior.

    Gráficos: 10
    Si jugaste al GoW 2018 con la actualización de PS5 te puedes hacer una buena idea de como se verá este nuevo juego. Es muy difícil que mejore gráficamente al juego de 2018 porque gráficamente es perfecto. Ahora GoW Ragnarok luce muchísimo más gracias a los entornos más variados. Los modelos de los personajes son excelentes en todos los aspectos, y el rendimiento es increíblemente bueno, mantiene los 60 fps de manera consistente.

    Sonido: 9
    La música está bien, pero tampoco es que cobre tanta importancia como ocurre en otros juegos como Final Fantasy XVI o Persona 5, la música de Ragnarok es buena pero no me pareció espectacular. Lo más sobresaliente es que el juego tiene audio disponible en una gran cantidad de idiomas y en mi caso me quedo una vez más con las voces en inglés.

    Jugabilidad: 7
    Ragnarok patina muy feo en el apartado jugable, para mi gusto hicieron el juego demasiado injusto para el jugador. Arruinaron muchas cosas en el aspecto jugable que tenia el primero Kratos se siente extremadamente débil y la mitad de los enemigos que encuentras en el juego pueden matarlo fácilmente de 3-4 golpes mientras que Kratos requiere conectar como una docena de golpes para derrotar a esos enemigos. Hay muchos enemigos que son literalmente esponjas de daño, y durante los combates aparecen y aparecen enemigos de la nada siempre buscando hacer daño por atrás y algunos de ellos volando por todo el escenario.
    También es ridículo ver como muchos adversarios caminan como si nada ante los ataques de Kratos y se mueven libremente mientras son atacados y además son capaces de interrumpir tus ataques mientras ellos son atacados. Los ataques rúnicos no tienen frames de invencibilidad y te dejan por completo vulnerable, incluso cuando conectan.
    Ahora, la mayoría de los jefes vuelan a velocidades ridículas por todo el escenario y las peleas contra ellos aburren porque parecen siempre lo mismo, la mayoría tienen patrones muy similares, siempre peleando de manera cobarde, con un patrón de pega y corre, spameando proyectiles, volando de un lado a otro para arruinar el enfoque.
    La ira activada con L3+R3 ha sido nerfeada de manera importante, casi no hace daño y es ridículo ver que tantos golpes causan tan poco daño, sin embargo sique siendo un recurso útil para interrumpir los ataques ridículos inbloqueables de los jefes y acortar distancia cuando se ponen a volar como locos por todo el escenario, por lo que recomiendo mucho activarlo para interrumpir ataques, acercarte, desactivarlo y continuar con ataques con armas.
    Otro aspecto que me molestó un poco es que también hayan nerfeado terriblemente las habilidades del escudo, ahora ya no tiene un árbol de habilidad como en el juego anterior, quizás porque ahora Kratos ya no depende tanto de quedarse sin un arma, al contar ahora con tres distintas.
    Por último, en el juego puedes utilizar a Atreus en algunas misiones. Sin embargo controlar a Atreus es super aburrido y simple y la mayoría de las veces consideré sus escenarios como simple relleno.

    Contenido: 9
    El contenido secundario mejoró enormenente. La historia principal apenas cubre un 30% del contenido total del juego. Hay muchas misiones secundarias, las cuales permiten expandir el lore. En Ragnarok puedes explorar los reinos que no estaban y la mayoría de ellos son mundos enormes, semiabiertos, con muchas misiones secundarias, muchos sub jefes, tesoros y muchas recompensas por descubrir.
    No le puse una nota perfecta al contenido porque al principio tiene mucho relleno, el juego es super pesado al principio, puzzles, puzzles, y más puzzles, muchos de ellos muy mal explicados. Recuerdo que en la primera misión conté como una docena de puzzles, y así sucede con las primeras tres misiones principales.
    Las misiones de Atreus son muy aburridas también, para mi aportan muy poco e incluso alentan el ritmo y disminuyen las ganas por jugar.

    Personajes/Historia: 10
    Excelente historia, personajes memorables y excelentes actuaciones. Aquí el juego es soberbio.

    Conclusión: Es un gran juego y sería perfecto de no ser porque el combate ahora es muy injusto para el jugador, lo cual lo hace muy frustante en algunos momentos, con un Kratos increíblemente más débil que la mayoría de los enemigos y los problemas de ritmo que se sienten sobre todo al principio del juego y que me hicieron muy pesado el principio del juego.    … Expand
  57. TheGamergon
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    This is a great Bethesda game. If you like Mass Effect and always wondered what it would be like if Bethesda tried to make one here you go. Is this game the most ground breaking, generation defining, life changing game made? That answer is No. Even if Bethesda gets all the bugs and glitches fixed, which they surely will, it is still just Futuristic Skyrim with occasional space dogfights.This is a great Bethesda game. If you like Mass Effect and always wondered what it would be like if Bethesda tried to make one here you go. Is this game the most ground breaking, generation defining, life changing game made? That answer is No. Even if Bethesda gets all the bugs and glitches fixed, which they surely will, it is still just Futuristic Skyrim with occasional space dogfights.

    That’s not to say it’s a bad game but a game we’ve played before making it more comfort food than new experience. For example the games main story line is near identical to Mass Effect as I mentioned it earlier. Main Character touches weird artifact of unknown origins and has wild visions that they don’t quite understand and their life is thrust in a new direction to understand what happened and why.

    Now I admit as a huge Mass Effect fan this is right up my ally so I am enjoying it but using my love of Mass Effect and Bethesda games to give this game a 10 and not deduct any points because of its flaws or that it wasn’t the game I was expecting based on what Todd Howard had said about it would be irresponsible.

    The point that it was supposed to be a vast Galaxy to be explored is true to a point. You can explore a galaxy of a thousand worlds but there is little to nothing to do on most of them so almost every review and even I will state you’ll probably never do much beyond going to the worlds that have quests. So outside of bragging rights doing it on Stream to prove you would land on all 1,000 worlds I can’t see a reason otherwise.

    Another flaw that is jarring to me is repetition of assets, and no I don’t mean sandwiches. I mean bases and buildings. You will go on a mission and infiltration a base and clear it out and a short while later and go take out another base and it will look identical to the last one even down to the location of the NPC enemies and the loot locations. This even happens in the main story line and it feels like you are doing the exact same thing you just did… because it is exactly the same thing you just did. These bases or caves can be replicated multiple times to you could just about play blindfolded once you reach them as you would be able to rely on muscle memory. Which I find to be lazy level design. If this were just in the side quests that would be bad but not as bad as the fact you run into this repetition in the main story line.

    The game has a lot to do and a lot to dig into if you want to build outposts and design custom ships. There are many ways to play and a lot to do. The side quests and side story lines are by far where the game shines and I did enjoy the main story but the meat and potato’s of this game is in that many varied things you can do from undercover agent to space pirate to day worker on an assembly line making Aurora. There are many things to peak one’s interest and if despite some of the flaws I mentioned and some I didn’t you like the other thing I mentioned or are a fan of Bethesda and Mass Effect then this might be the game for you.

    If you have GamePass you should give it a try if not buy if you think it is for you or wait for a sale giving time for the many bugs and glitches to be rectified.

    Good luck space cowboy.    … Expand
  58. AlexChen
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Same old game as usual. Nothing knew in this game. Not bad, but definitely not good. Baldur’s Gate 3 and Zelda this year are making Starfield even less interesting. Great games in 2023. Starfield is not one of them.
  59. mrblancoljdldb
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    El juego es bastante bueno y a mi parecer puede ser lo mas top de este año pero por mi parte jugar 6-8 horas ya has visto la mayor parte del juego y pues si hay planetas muy vacíos
  60. Liathen
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    This is not a bad game. It's not a great game either. It's Fallout but in space. There's no sweeping vistas or cool dungeons/vaults. It lacks a lot of the Fallout "attitude" and humor that makes a Fallout game. If you like Bethesda games, you'll like Starfield. If you're a first timer it's probably a coin flip. I had fun in my 40 hours playing it, but not enough fun to keep playingThis is not a bad game. It's not a great game either. It's Fallout but in space. There's no sweeping vistas or cool dungeons/vaults. It lacks a lot of the Fallout "attitude" and humor that makes a Fallout game. If you like Bethesda games, you'll like Starfield. If you're a first timer it's probably a coin flip. I had fun in my 40 hours playing it, but not enough fun to keep playing beyond that 40 hours. Take that how you will.… Expand
  61. Erfancafbr
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    In my opinion, Starfield is a good game, but one of the biggest problems of this game is the creation engine 2, which I think Bethesda should have worked on because the character animations are not interesting. On the other hand, the game world is empty, according to Bethesda, who says that out of 1000 planets, only 100 of them have life and those 100 do not have that many details. IIn my opinion, Starfield is a good game, but one of the biggest problems of this game is the creation engine 2, which I think Bethesda should have worked on because the character animations are not interesting. On the other hand, the game world is empty, according to Bethesda, who says that out of 1000 planets, only 100 of them have life and those 100 do not have that many details. I wish he made the game with unreal engine 5, in my opinion, it would have improved a lot, it would have affected the NPCs and the game environment. But in general, Starfield is good game, not a bad game, but it cannot be called a very good or great game either.… Expand
  62. Spacemonkey1964
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    Starfield is a fps set in space which has rpg elements, resource farming and crafting thrown in for good measure. The graphics aren't great, very much last gen especially the character models who you spend a lot of time making inane conversations with. The main story is boring and predictable and most of the side content is little better. Much of the content is copy and paste, you willStarfield is a fps set in space which has rpg elements, resource farming and crafting thrown in for good measure. The graphics aren't great, very much last gen especially the character models who you spend a lot of time making inane conversations with. The main story is boring and predictable and most of the side content is little better. Much of the content is copy and paste, you will encounter the exact same base on several planets. Space flight is simply a series of loading screens and once you have visited a planet you can simply fast travel there. Really? A space game where you don't even need to get in your ship?! The many menu screens are drab and display little graphic design flair. I'm only 7 hours in and I hear the game gets better after 12-15 hours but honestly I can't be bothered with it. I got it with game pass so at least I didn't waste real money on it. I don't understand the 100% reviews, to me 100% means perfection and Starfield is a long, long way from that.… Expand
  63. BeautyBear
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    This is a game you don't have to compare with other games in the genre. As a stand-alone game, it's perfectly fine. Many elements here I like, like with ships and feeling that the world has moved on and into space.
    But what I miss here is an atmosphere that lives and reacts. Cyberpunk gave more of going from a to b with reactions and little things that happen. This is where this game    This is a game you don't have to compare with other games in the genre. As a stand-alone game, it's perfectly fine. Many elements here I like, like with ships and feeling that the world has moved on and into space.
    But what I miss here is an atmosphere that lives and reacts. Cyberpunk gave more of going from a to b with reactions and little things that happen. This is where this game falls a bit short. I can't bear to spend time wandering around.    … Expand
  64. Leopash117
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Just a fallout reskin in space nothing interesting to see and doesn’t feel as advanced as people was hyping
  65. Wikiwooha
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    It's ability to inspire awe is only matched by it's frustrations. The gunplay is the best Bethesda has made to date, but still feels dated. The cities feel lived in and crafted with care, but most worlds you visit feel bland. The menus and HUD are . . . Bad. Just bad. The characters are pretty great and I've enjoyed much of the dialogue and dynamics between them. I truly feel like a fewIt's ability to inspire awe is only matched by it's frustrations. The gunplay is the best Bethesda has made to date, but still feels dated. The cities feel lived in and crafted with care, but most worlds you visit feel bland. The menus and HUD are . . . Bad. Just bad. The characters are pretty great and I've enjoyed much of the dialogue and dynamics between them. I truly feel like a few well placed patches would pull this game up to the quality we were all hoping for. Starfield may not be worth it's steep pricetag, but it is worthy of your time.

    I am so sorry if you paid the extra 30$ to play it early, you deserve a hug.    … Expand
  66. Ker1289
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Es un buen juego me gusta mucho la temática de el espacio pero hay cosas que me sacan de onda las pantallas de carga son una molestia cortas pero existen muchas y muy seguidas la inteligencia artificial da asco los npc son horribles la expresiones se notan muy del 2010 mucho planeta completamente vacío lastima que no existan vehículos o monturas y la exploración espacial es bastante malaEs un buen juego me gusta mucho la temática de el espacio pero hay cosas que me sacan de onda las pantallas de carga son una molestia cortas pero existen muchas y muy seguidas la inteligencia artificial da asco los npc son horribles la expresiones se notan muy del 2010 mucho planeta completamente vacío lastima que no existan vehículos o monturas y la exploración espacial es bastante mala el juego no está mal pero jamás en mi opinión jamás sería ni otra ser candidato a goty del año… Expand
  67. Rauin
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Poor optimization, loading screen every time you enter a location, graphics from 2011. This game is basically Skyrim's space mode.
  68. Coomedia
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    ---- Review in English ----
    Positive pointer: - Construction of incredible ships, many possibilities. - Very nice graphic quality of space/items/ships/planets, generating many cinematic images. - Very good side quest. - Fluid gameplay and fun to play. - Great soundtrack. - Creation of outposts, complex and generates many possibilities. - Very good dubbing (in English). - Fun space    ---- Review in English ----
    Positive pointer: - Construction of incredible ships, many possibilities. - Very nice graphic quality of space/items/ships/planets, generating many cinematic images. - Very good side quest. - Fluid gameplay and fun to play. - Great soundtrack. - Creation of outposts, complex and generates many possibilities. - Very good dubbing (in English). - Fun space battles (complex, it's not the same anymore, you have to concentrate and make choices that would prevent you from dying). - On Xbox series X the 30 fps are mostly stuck and well disguised (less in cities). Negative points: - Load Manys (the game was not placed on an entire scaled map, they placed several submaps, which generates load for everything). - Exploration raza/null (the previous point influenced this... another thing is that because it is divided into sub maps, you land on a planet does not allow you to go to another point on that same planet, being necessary to leave and enter it. .You only go to battle, otherwise just fast travel). - Faces of the characters (totally without fact, out of line with the narration) - Missing a pt br dubbing - bad AI (same level as cyberpunk) - Missing a 60 fps mode - Graphic quality of the main city, new atlantic, very weak (the vegetation graphic is distorted from the rest of the game, looking very artificial). - Main Quest is average (doesn't make you want to do it, because side quests are much more attractive).

    Final Grade: 7.0 (Upgrades with patches/mods)

    ---- Review em Português ----
    Pontos positivos:
    - Construção de naves incrível, muitas possibilidades.
    - Qualidade gráfica do espaço/itens/naves/planetas muito bonitas, gerando muitas imagens cinematográficas.
    - Side quest muito boa.
    - Gameplay fluida e gostosa de jogar.
    - Ótima trilha sonora.
    - Criação de postos avançados, complexo e gera muitas possibilidades.
    - Dublagem muito boa (em inglês).
    - Batalhas no espaço divertidas (complexo, não é mais do mesmo, você tem que se concentrar e fazer escolhas que evitaram que você morra).
    - No Xbox série X os 30 fps estão na maior parte do tempo cravados e bem disfarçado (menos em cidades).

    Pontos negativos:
    - Muitos Loads (o jogo não foi colocaram um mapa inteiro dimensionado, colocaram vários submapas, o que gera load para tudo).
    - Exploração raza/nula (o ponto anterior influência nisso... outra coisa é que por ser dividido em sub mapas, vc descer em um planeta não permite vc ir para outro ponto desse mesmo planeta, sendo necessário sair e entrar no mesmo... você só voa para batalhar, de resto, só fast travel).
    - Face dos personagens (totalmente sem reação, distoa da narração)
    - Faltou uma dublagem pt br
    - IA ruim (mesmo nível de cyberpunk)
    - Faltou um modo 60 fps
    - Qualidade gráfica da cidade principal, nova atlântica, muito fraca (o gráfico da vegetação distoa do resto do jogo, parecendo muito artificial). - Main Quest é mediana (não te faz querer fazer ela, as side quest são muito mais atrativas). Nota final: 7.0 (Cabe melhorias com patch/mods)    … Expand
  69. Rockstar2167
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Starfield isn't a game for everyone, it's attempt to be immersive if overshadowed by its lack of depth in the storyline. While elements of the game are excellent, such as ship creation and exploration capabilities, it lacks any real substance to be considered an RPG. Decisions have no real impact on your characters path to the end game, it's perk system is too similar to Bethesda'sStarfield isn't a game for everyone, it's attempt to be immersive if overshadowed by its lack of depth in the storyline. While elements of the game are excellent, such as ship creation and exploration capabilities, it lacks any real substance to be considered an RPG. Decisions have no real impact on your characters path to the end game, it's perk system is too similar to Bethesda's previous Open world titles, weapon mechanics are just like, if not the same as Fallout 4. Enemy AI isn't exactly intelligent and is either too easy to kill or complete bullet sponges. I feel Bethesda hasn't learned from previous mistakes in the past.… Expand
  70. guico
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    I spent 6h playing, with 2h just to test improvement mods for this game.

    • The performance is terrible. Even playing with an 11th generation i7 and a RTX 3070 and on the SSD (it's not from China), on medium settings the game runs between 40/60fps, and in urban areas it drops to 25. You can improve this with mods, but you lose quality. • Weak AI, stupid enemies that become damage    I spent 6h playing, with 2h just to test improvement mods for this game.

    • The performance is terrible. Even playing with an 11th generation i7 and a RTX 3070 and on the SSD (it's not from China), on medium settings the game runs between 40/60fps, and in urban areas it drops to 25. You can improve this with mods, but you lose quality.
    • Weak AI, stupid enemies that become damage sponges, it's frustrating.
    • Inventory hard to use, with a lot of time spent on loot, you have to use another mod to make it more intuitive.
    • Lack of map in the cities, creating frustrating navigation and forced memorization of locations.
    • Problematic ship navigation with many loadings and infinite fast travels, you have to remember where you've been.
    • Bugged and horrible NPCs, a trademark of Bethesda titles.

    The whole gameplay is a mix of very good moments with very bad ones, and you get the feeling that you are playing something unfinished, it will be another title from Bethesda that the community will have to fix    … Expand
  71. RenanDX
    Sep 9, 2023
    6
    An average game has nothing innovative with a mediocre story but the biggest problems are the lies and proposals that were given to us and did not deliver the game is not bad but it is far from being good
  72. Venoir
    Sep 11, 2023
    5
    Starfield se configura como un fugaz resplandor en el firmamento de los videojuegos, una constelación de decepción en lugar de una galaxia de éxtasis. Su ambición galáctica se eclipsa en una ejecución deficiente, sumiendo al jugador en un cosmos de desencanto irremediable.
  73. ODT
    Sep 10, 2023
    6
    The best thing for me persinally about Starfield is I'm no longer dying to play the next Elder Scrolls. This game really just has very little charm and feels just....pointless. I'm 15 hours in. Maybe I'll get into it more.
  74. musicgamer
    Sep 12, 2023
    5
    Lots and lots to see, different ways of approaching, sone really good detail in places, huge game, plenty to do and even funny at atimes with the unpredictably that happen Bethesda games. Even the empty planets can be quite immersive just walking around reaching places and watching out for miles into a lonely desolate world, and can be a nice change. A game that where you decide to go andLots and lots to see, different ways of approaching, sone really good detail in places, huge game, plenty to do and even funny at atimes with the unpredictably that happen Bethesda games. Even the empty planets can be quite immersive just walking around reaching places and watching out for miles into a lonely desolate world, and can be a nice change. A game that where you decide to go and do one thing or reach a area but end up doing many other things as there's so many things that can distract you like: reading random books, site seeing, watching NPC, finding notes, enjoying the environment, upgrading, listening in on NPC, experimenting, discovering secrets, building ships, mining, discovering quests, experiencing random events, messing around with physics...etc..etc. The graphics at times can really impress and with detail, even when not at its best this game still looks great for most part. The games feels smooth and is great to have a 3rd perspective view. The action is good and very functional and dies the job well enough without all the OTT flashy action modern games seem to do and without QTE and Scripted events - it's more back to basics but in a very good way! This is not No Man's Sky, they are different games with only Space being the common theme. For Starfield is Mass Effect meets Skyrim but with its own features, that you experience as you further get into the game. A quality game that brings adventure, RPG, exploration, different styles of approach, action, story, quests this branch out, customisation, and other things and also considering the freedom, random events and scale of this game...it delivers a very enjoyable and immersive game that will give players different experiences each time you play - a game that can and will probably still be played 10yrs(+) from now as updates, mods, dlc will start to appear just like on classics Skyrim, Fallout games.… Expand
  75. stoff75
    Sep 9, 2023
    5
    Game was being hyped so much that it couldn’t live up to it! And it was miles off !! It’s poorly optimised, it’s buggy, it has useless mechanics and some mechanics that aren’t ever explained, and the RPG element is completely missing! No matter the choices I make the game pretty much plays out the same with minor differences, even the +New Game mode plays out pretty much identically. TheyGame was being hyped so much that it couldn’t live up to it! And it was miles off !! It’s poorly optimised, it’s buggy, it has useless mechanics and some mechanics that aren’t ever explained, and the RPG element is completely missing! No matter the choices I make the game pretty much plays out the same with minor differences, even the +New Game mode plays out pretty much identically. They should’ve been more creative in the narrative and design to make it a real RPG.… Expand
  76. RBJ23
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    I understand the disappointment and the mixed reviews. There was a TON of hype surrounding this game. I learned my lesson on that after Cyberpunk released. I did not have any expectations going in and so far I have had fun playing after nearly 20 hours in. There still feels like a lot to do and yes, the travel system, loading screen and performance are subpar but for me it doesnt take awayI understand the disappointment and the mixed reviews. There was a TON of hype surrounding this game. I learned my lesson on that after Cyberpunk released. I did not have any expectations going in and so far I have had fun playing after nearly 20 hours in. There still feels like a lot to do and yes, the travel system, loading screen and performance are subpar but for me it doesnt take away from the fun of this RPG. Solid game that I will continue to play in the following weeks.… Expand
  77. bennibop
    Sep 7, 2023
    6
    Good but not great. Let's start with the negatives, game can crash on Xbox series x, map and UI are probably the worst I have experienced in a long time. Loading screens are constant and annoying, load screen to the outside of your ship then another to get in then another to go to space. Space sections also feel pointless and just filler.
    Graphically although detailed in places the game    Good but not great. Let's start with the negatives, game can crash on Xbox series x, map and UI are probably the worst I have experienced in a long time. Loading screens are constant and annoying, load screen to the outside of your ship then another to get in then another to go to space. Space sections also feel pointless and just filler.
    Graphically although detailed in places the game feels uneven. Can look fantastic when there is not a lot going on, so more the art that is the winner here. Lighting can feel very flat and NPC look below average for modern day standards.HDR is a mess and looks washed out and grey, why there is no slider after the game has been delayed previously.
    Positives: some quest lines are really great perhaps some of the best Bethesda have ever done , but some are really repetitive. Gun play is massively improved over their previous work such as Fallout, but don't expect Halo or Doom levels of gun play. Overall Fallout 3 is still my favourite Bethesda game, but thrwe is still lots to like about Starfield despite its shortcomings but I don't believe it has delivered on the hype that was built.    … Expand
  78. TheBirne
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    The idea of a NASA punk setting and the possibility to explore space is great, but this game is not good enough to transport this dream. The space flight is nearly not existent and when it is, the steering and space combat feel dull and boring. The main Story is flat and introduced "magic" without any scientific ideas or explanations. There are no drivable vehicles nor the ability to flyThe idea of a NASA punk setting and the possibility to explore space is great, but this game is not good enough to transport this dream. The space flight is nearly not existent and when it is, the steering and space combat feel dull and boring. The main Story is flat and introduced "magic" without any scientific ideas or explanations. There are no drivable vehicles nor the ability to fly the ship on a planet. There sn no mini map and no help to navigate in cities. The ruins you can find on planets have only rarely a story to discover. Dialogues are boring written and feel cringe often ... I could continue this list for many more points, but I think you get the idea.… Expand
  79. adamf13
    Sep 9, 2023
    7
    I am enjoying it, but there are some issues that stop it being a great game imo.

    - graphics are average - loading screens kill the immersion for me - fast travel is way too easy, never need to fly your ship. - piracy not great when you're left with 1000 credits once you've "registered" the ship - personally I don't like the way the perk system works - economy and price of some items needs    I am enjoying it, but there are some issues that stop it being a great game imo.

    - graphics are average
    - loading screens kill the immersion for me
    - fast travel is way too easy, never need to fly your ship.
    - piracy not great when you're left with 1000 credits once you've "registered" the ship
    - personally I don't like the way the perk system works
    - economy and price of some items needs reworking imo

    Hopefully some of this will be addressed with patches    … Expand
  80. fafafa486
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Un juego que quizo abarcar mucho y se queda corto , muchos Bugs, historia simple, y esa sensación de aventura dura muy poco, deben actualizar el motor gráfico , lo único bueno es gamepass si no no lo hubiera comprado… Expand
  81. lyekay1
    Sep 8, 2023
    6
    It's okay, nothing special. I agree the graphics are outdated, but a fun game nevertheless.
  82. MadWasp79
    Sep 9, 2023
    6
    There are so many things to like about Starfield, however, I can't like it as a whole.
    I spent hundreds and hundreds of hours playing Elite Dangerous, Fallout, Skyrim, and Mass Effect, I hoped so much that this would be some glorious mix of them all.. and in a way it I, but. Boring, glitchy, repetitive, you can't swap modules between ships, no land vehicles and I don't like to walk so    There are so many things to like about Starfield, however, I can't like it as a whole.
    I spent hundreds and hundreds of hours playing Elite Dangerous, Fallout, Skyrim, and Mass Effect, I hoped so much that this would be some glorious mix of them all.. and in a way it I, but. Boring, glitchy, repetitive, you can't swap modules between ships, no land vehicles and I don't like to walk so much for nothing, exploration without a soul. Bethesda, you have failed us. Again. The only hope (as always) for mod community.    … Expand
  83. Taiyu
    Sep 10, 2023
    5
    This game shows the developer simply does not have the ability to innovate.
    The outdated engine simply cannot support an ambitious game like this.
    A totally broken game.
    MS can recruit as many as paid reviewer here to give a 9 or 10, it will not change the fact that it is a broken game. It is real rad in 2023 we get to see a broken game like this from a well established studio.
  84. OdinX1985
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Finally Starfield is here with so much hype build up to which it was somewhat a let down. My mixed feelings is based on how the game was presented as if the game was this open vast space opera. I wasn't thrilled on alot of things..the world seemed empty especially on planets now this isn't an indie game but there are times that I felt I was in the same structure just on different planets.Finally Starfield is here with so much hype build up to which it was somewhat a let down. My mixed feelings is based on how the game was presented as if the game was this open vast space opera. I wasn't thrilled on alot of things..the world seemed empty especially on planets now this isn't an indie game but there are times that I felt I was in the same structure just on different planets. It's just odd to why as Bethesda just paste it just on a different planet little odd to say. The graphics are authentic and vastly impressive from the same engine of FO4 but classic Bethesda npcs look disgusting. Gameplay is what shines here definitely enjoyable and responsive no issues for me. Story..eh well it's not bad nor a great it's serviceable. Starfield isn't a bad game but Starfield feels like No Man Sky and Star Citizen in certain formula..those games exceeded the exploration well Starfield did not. But Starfield can be fun but the content seems bare to me to which feel disappointing. And I respect the game for what it is my score is a 5 for bare content, lack of exploring and reused structures within the different planets. But the game is enjoyable at least.… Expand
  85. KARF4GEN
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Представьте себе, что у Вас видение древнего послания.
    Представили?
    Только Вы не Шеппард, а безымянный шахтер Но Вам тоже с ничего вдруг дали звездолет и задание узнать величайшую тайну Только Вы не офицер армии Земли и не герой войны с Турианцами. Вы шахтер. Представили? Поздравляю этот сценарий и игру в целом делали более 10 лет Откровенно говоря даже немного вздрогнул от    Представьте себе, что у Вас видение древнего послания.
    Представили?
    Только Вы не Шеппард, а безымянный шахтер
    Но Вам тоже с ничего вдруг дали звездолет и задание узнать величайшую тайну
    Только Вы не офицер армии Земли и не герой войны с Турианцами.
    Вы шахтер.
    Представили?
    Поздравляю этот сценарий и игру в целом делали более 10 лет
    Откровенно говоря даже немного вздрогнул от старой-доброй анимации присаживания модельки ГГ на стул.
    Она прямо из 2008 года, когда еще в зеленых тонах мы искали отца. Отец потерялся в Обливионе из Пустошей. Старфилд же у нас коричневый, как Нью Вегас, но отовсюду торчат уши еще третьего Фаллаута.
    Впрочем и графона тут не увидел на 40 фпс с высокими 1080р с 2080s на борту..
    Вот ничего не увидел для себя интересного.
    Так жаль..
    Хотя радует, что игрока заставят отправится в Сол.Сис и посмотреть на то, что осталось от нашей Родины Земли.
    Возможно единственный полезный посыл всей игры за 3.5 тысячи рублей, а ведь кто-то купил ее за сто баксов.
    Доброго вам всем ребята здоровья    … Expand
  86. joshbreviews
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Fast Travel Simulator.

    Lifeless character models. World barely reacts to your actions. Generic shooting and bullet-sponge enemies. Boring main story. Ship combat like wading through a sewer. Empty planets procedurally-generated. Even the procedurally-generated content repeats incredibly frequently.' Boring companions. Companion's hook is that he's a single dad?    Fast Travel Simulator.

    Lifeless character models.

    World barely reacts to your actions.

    Generic shooting and bullet-sponge enemies.

    Boring main story.

    Ship combat like wading through a sewer.

    Empty planets procedurally-generated.

    Even the procedurally-generated content repeats incredibly frequently.'

    Boring companions. Companion's hook is that he's a single dad? Huh??

    Pr*n*uns. A man is a man. A woman is a woman. Let's not give children g*nd*r dysph*ria. The fact that I feel the need to censor myself speaks to the sorry state of the world in general.

    Boring fetch quests.

    God-awful UI.

    God-awful inventory management.

    Buggy. Buggy-ness proudly worn as a badge of honour by Bethesda. Why?

    Zero optimizations. Prepare your RTX 4090 to get stable 60 fps.

    Locking out DLSS for no good reason.

    Full expects modders to fix their game for them.

    Elder Scrolls six will be a DUD. The next Fallout will be a DUD. No good games from Bethesda since Skyrim. All hope is lost for this studio. Todd resign.    … Expand
  87. DoTheBartMan
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    If your were hoping Starfield would be the game Bethesda uses to stretch their creative limbs you will be disappointed, combat AI is is a let-down and the space travel is a shell of what was expected.

    Character creator is good, with a variety of options, building your ship can be fun too. I've seen tutorials on making the Normandy from Mass Effect That being said, if you are looking    If your were hoping Starfield would be the game Bethesda uses to stretch their creative limbs you will be disappointed, combat AI is is a let-down and the space travel is a shell of what was expected.

    Character creator is good, with a variety of options, building your ship can be fun too. I've seen tutorials on making the Normandy from Mass Effect

    That being said, if you are looking for a top class space adventure full of exploration and innovation

    Buy No Mans Sky    … Expand
  88. LastHokage
    Sep 9, 2023
    7
    I had high expectations with Starfield. I was expecting Skyrim in Space where I will be stuck on my Xbox for days and cant put it down. Well, I really can't get into it.. I don't feel attached to my character, the story feels intriguing but its not something that keeps me playing. I feel like they need to a lot of changes for this to be the Skyrim in space that everyone wants it to be,I had high expectations with Starfield. I was expecting Skyrim in Space where I will be stuck on my Xbox for days and cant put it down. Well, I really can't get into it.. I don't feel attached to my character, the story feels intriguing but its not something that keeps me playing. I feel like they need to a lot of changes for this to be the Skyrim in space that everyone wants it to be, its not even Fallout level for me. I see a comment on FB that calls this a "Fast Travel Simulation", that is pretty much the exploring portion of the game. I have put about 20 hrs and I think I will be putting it down for now, I spent about $30 for the premium pack and felt it was a waste.… Expand
  89. Ic3_winterhell
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Un videojuego que hace todo a medias, Bethesda perdió Calidad:

    Rendimiento pésimo: Tengo una 3060 y mientras la gran mayoría de juegos me corre a 60-120fps en ultra, Starfield en cambio con animaciones recicladas de fallout 4 y modelos y movimientos de Skirym de xbox 360 corra solo a 30 con caídas puntuales a 20 Fps. Eso sin contar los mas de 10 Bugs que he tenido en solo 20 horas de    Un videojuego que hace todo a medias, Bethesda perdió Calidad:

    Rendimiento pésimo: Tengo una 3060 y mientras la gran mayoría de juegos me corre a 60-120fps en ultra, Starfield en cambio con animaciones recicladas de fallout 4 y modelos y movimientos de Skirym de xbox 360 corra solo a 30 con caídas puntuales a 20 Fps. Eso sin contar los mas de 10 Bugs que he tenido en solo 20 horas de juego. Tambien recalcar que es un juego con una estructura que viene desde inicio de los 2000s donde si entras a un edificio carga otro escenario y no es un mundo que carga a la ves lo que hace que se corte la sensacion de estar en un mundo vivo, hay que recordar que eso se hacia en esa era para ahorrar renderizado a finales del ps2 pero Starfield lo hace en pleno 2023!!! Una locura que hasta me da risa xd

    Sistema de Progresión: Si bien las habilidades son una mejora del sistema de Fallout, al final se siente muy inferior a este, y es que el VATS en fallout 4 te hacia que vieras ciertos efectos como si se tratara de un juego de roll por turnos al ralentizar la acción y tenias certeza jugable de que ciertas habilidades se aplicaran y era tremendamente satisfactorio. En cambio las habilidades de Starfield quitando las de exploración, no tienen ningún sentido real en combate y al final todo se resume en un Fps generico con lo mismos enemigos de siempre solo como esponja de balas. Esto es mas grave aun ya que el sistema no es muy inteligente y te pone a enemigos de nivel bajo casi al terminar la campaña y otros de nivel bajo casi al inicio, un desastre total, se nota que no supieron hacia donde se dirigiria el jugador en las misiones y todas parecen plantadas aleatoriamente.Un ejemplo de como se puedo resolver esto es como lo hace xenoblade, donde las mismas misiones están en forma de arbol y se va abriendo y desbloqueando poco a poco de forma progresiva con 2 a 3 ramificaciones simultaneas.

    Exploración y combate espacial mediocre: Starfield al principio se siente con mucha libertad, pero como vas explorando te das cuenta que es muy obvio que lo principal es mejorar la nave como no Mans Sky, esto no seria un problema si la exploración fuera TOTALMENTE LIBRE pero no es asi, quien allá jugado Mass effect o the outher world sentirá que Starfield hace exactamente lo mismo pero peor ya que en Mass effect tienes un vehiculo donde puedes visitar cada planeta con mayor soltura, en starfield no hay vehículos solo el jetpack que es mas para los combates que para la Exploración. Una ves que mejoras tu nave parece que estuvieras jugando un juego de recreativas de los 90s con muy poca profundidad. Si le sumamos a que cada ves que quieres viajar lo unico que puedes hacer es fast travel a las orbitas de cada planeta mas que un juego de exploracion se siente como un juego de Menus que resulta sumamente Claustrofobico, la misma sensacion que comentaba de los edificios anteriormente. Para esto tambien hay una solucion en la industria en otros juegos, por ejemplo los juegos modernos van renderizando conforme avanza el jugador lo hace nomans sky en el espacio y horizon forbident wet en agua aire y tierra, la distancia de dibujado se va pintando conforme el jugador avanza y a donde volteas a ver, inclusive halo infintite es muy superior en ese sentido. Esta claro que el motor de Starfield ya no puede seguir mas y para Elder of scrolls 6 seria una burla que lo siguieran usando.

    Diversion a veces: Starfield me hizo soltar algunas lagrimas, lagrimas por el hecho de que recorde lo bien que estaba Skirym y Fallout 3-4 a nivel de exploración y que Starfield se siente como un corta y pega reciclado de cosas de esos 2 titulos con ninguna cohesión, no se si el hecho de que xbox este involucrado haya afectado, pero si se siente que no lleva la misma calidad que antes, no hay tantos detalles como antes no se siente esa esencia de bethesda, hay diversión creada por ti mismo con los elementos que hay pero no porque el juego te la brinde, los objetivos del juego no son claros, nunca la fueron, es un producto inflado que pasara al olvido por la mayoría después del Hype. No importa que nota tenga, no es un producto premium de bethsda, es solo una experiencia que hace todo a medias.

    Para terminar me gustaria decir que los fanaticos de xbox le han hecho muy mal a este juego, porque lejos de criticar sus fallos para que mejoren o lo actualizen, no han hecho mas que ponerlo en un pedestal solo por revanchismo y la guerra de consolas, haciendo teorias de que todos mienten y ellos solo son los que tienen la razon y es un juegazo, lo cual no es verdad, tengo series X y PC y no gano nada con auntoengañarme solo por decir que xbox es mejor cuando no es el titulo que tanto vendieron.    … Expand
  90. sixlink
    Sep 9, 2023
    7
    I'm sure for the right person this a great game! But even if you're not into a particular genre, a good game is a good game.
    Unfortunately i couldn't get past the rigidly stiff combat, the lack of creative writing around the immediate inclusion of secret society, the lack of character development, the sterile nature of the whole game despite looking very life like, feels like a science    I'm sure for the right person this a great game! But even if you're not into a particular genre, a good game is a good game.
    Unfortunately i couldn't get past the rigidly stiff combat, the lack of creative writing around the immediate inclusion of secret society, the lack of character development, the sterile nature of the whole game despite looking very life like, feels like a science lab.
    Looks really good and amazing attention to visual details etc...
    Poor dialogue, no empathy with charecters, sold entirely on being big.
    Can't fly space ship sub stratosphere?!
    Soleless city of new uninspired blandness, jiw odd that I'm freely breathing with no space suit, yet my carbon levels build up and harm during time in normal atmosphere...
    Attention to details, please..
    Spaceship just a glorified loading screen, mini game of fighter pilot lacks depth (starfox did it better on tge superfx chip)
    Such a shame, less bethesda jank than usual but still pretty much broken in places..
    This game ticks so many boxes adequately, lacks soul, and really honestly umm it gets good after 10 to 20 hrs..
    Great plan, I couldn't face anymore fetch and carry, yank my chain missions to get that far..
    Ok if you don't have a job, life, or any thing else to play.. Dull    … Expand
  91. leonfjf
    Sep 10, 2023
    5
    It's not fun. It puts me to sleep every time.

    Poor combat experience, enemy AI retarded. The plot is too flat to be fun. And why can it be transmitted wherever it is? To cover up a vast but barren world?
  92. Sleevedagger
    Sep 8, 2023
    7
    Starfield is a good game depending on what you was expecting. If you like addictive looter shooter type games with RPG and exploring elements then you will like it. But if you were expecting an immersive space sim then this is not it. Not bad at all just not great either.
  93. Thwomp
    Sep 10, 2023
    5
    Holy crap this is one of the most boring games ever. It's not terrible, but pretty mediocre. A LOT of ....empty nothingness. Just watch streamer vids and you'll see for yourself. This game will put you to sleep.

    Bethesda blows.
  94. Mikireq
    Sep 10, 2023
    5
    Es un juego entretenido pero gráficamente muy desfasado. Es inaceptable que en Xbox series x el rendimiento sea a 30fps y no darte opción a modo rendimiento a 60 fps. La exploración de planetas a base de menús de cargas cortan la inmersión. Aún así es entretenido. Bethesda ha de cambiar ese motor gráfico ya
  95. Vzero16
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    No acepto que hayan cosas como que las balas no traspasen cristales, paredes o incluso huecos de estanterías, supuestamente zonas de cobertura. Aparte de eso para hacer un juego de rol y con los recursos necesarios creo que es muy importante darle vida a los personajes que nos encontremos, literalmente todos parecen robots y encima las IA's de compañeros que te persiguen o los enemigosNo acepto que hayan cosas como que las balas no traspasen cristales, paredes o incluso huecos de estanterías, supuestamente zonas de cobertura. Aparte de eso para hacer un juego de rol y con los recursos necesarios creo que es muy importante darle vida a los personajes que nos encontremos, literalmente todos parecen robots y encima las IA's de compañeros que te persiguen o los enemigos está mal hecha y entorpece la jugabilidad muchísimo, y no me refiero a bugs. No hay menús donde te diga donde están los lugares que ya has visitado o te los marque en el mapa de alguna manera, lo cual habiendo mil planetas me parece un error de manual porque no te vas a poner a mirar uno a uno para encontrar la tienda que visitaste o la estación que quisiste robar y dejaste a medias porque no estabas al nivel adecuado. Aparte de estas cosas que te pueden fastidiar la jugabilidad si eres un jugador mas exigente, tengo que añadir que el juego no deja de ser un shooter pobre con un árbol de "habilidades" que no te cambia la jugabilidad y con un componente de rol basado en el espacio lo cual podría estar bien si hubiera planetas trabajados con ciudades ricas en exploración y secretos, pero por desgracia la realidad es que estamos explorando desierto tras desierto y entrando en bases miméticas todo el rato.

    PROS:
    -Físicas buenas y que varían dependiendo de el planeta
    -Las modificaciones de las naves
    -Puedes hacer tu historia y no tienes que seguir una historia lineal
    -Cierta libertad para afrontar el juego

    CONTRAS:
    -Motor gráfico antiguo, ya deberían de cambiarlo
    -IA pobre o inexistente
    -Bastantes bugs
    -Mundos vacíos
    -Pantallas de carga a cada rato que rompen la sensación de mundo abierto
    -El sigilo no es satisfactorio
    -El gunplay no se disfruta por la falta de IA    … Expand
  96. AlexNorman2000
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Very poor dialogs and scenario for all quests. No motivation at all. Primary school level. Too sad it doesn’t give me a chance to enjoy space and environment.
  97. AncientAmber
    Sep 9, 2023
    5
    It's a strange thing to play this game. List the features of the game: open universe, space battles, terrestrial combat, diverse factions interacting, loads of different weapons, deep character customisation; it should be a great game.

    But. At no point in the game am I actually having fun in the moment. For the first dozen hours, I am instead merely anticipating enjoyment, but it never    It's a strange thing to play this game. List the features of the game: open universe, space battles, terrestrial combat, diverse factions interacting, loads of different weapons, deep character customisation; it should be a great game.

    But. At no point in the game am I actually having fun in the moment. For the first dozen hours, I am instead merely anticipating enjoyment, but it never comes. This is because the developers were so focussed on the big things I listed above that they forgot to make any of the constituent elements of those things interesting or fun.

    The space fights devolve into trivial encounters in which one holds a button while following another ship, or they consist of a series of jousts. The ground combat is seriously like something out of the 90s, the AI is basic AF and the layout of the missions means that an interesting stealth approach is generally unfeasible.

    The missions are structured in a way that leaves one simply fast travelling and waiting in loading screens, or even worse, following a cookie cutter npc as they walk incredibly slowly towards another npc. When the NPCs speak, it is with half arsed vocal performances delivering lines so boring that one learns mash the skip button within 5 minutes of playing.

    Anyone who's played Star Citizen knows that one of the best things about that game is how seamless the transition between atmosphere and space is, the knowledge that you could actually fly 2km down to the surface and land your ship enriches the (broken) experience so much. The fact that Bethesda did not allow us to fly in atmosphere and land our ships and all that is baffling to me. They go to all this effort to make different planets and outer space, but don't actually link them in an interesting way. Because of this, each planet, and space itself, feels siloed when it should all feel connected and open.

    Genuinely, honestly, the highlight of this game is the lockpicking. Finally someone has found a nice middle ground in difficulty for this age-old game mechanic.

    Between the interest in this, Star Citizen and No Man's Sky, we know the market for a great space opera game is out there. No one seems quite able to pull it off.    … Expand
  98. pedlou
    Sep 10, 2023
    6
    Bonjour, Je lui mets la note de 6/10 ça reste un jeu jouable mais sans + Je m’attendais à beaucoup mieux et dans le genre c’est un énième witcher.
  99. HughMBehavior
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    Pretty boring so far (4 hours.) I'll change my review if that changes. This game needs a big dose of medicine from Dr. Nomansky.

    This is MOST DEFINITELY a Gamepass Game. At least you'll be able to play Civ 6 & Monster Train & GREAT RPGs like Pillars of Eternity 2 & Dragon Age & New Vegas & Oblivion if you don't like this. Or No Man's Sky! Those are some good consolation prizes. And    Pretty boring so far (4 hours.) I'll change my review if that changes. This game needs a big dose of medicine from Dr. Nomansky.

    This is MOST DEFINITELY a Gamepass Game.
    At least you'll be able to play Civ 6 & Monster Train & GREAT RPGs like Pillars of Eternity 2 & Dragon Age & New Vegas & Oblivion if you don't like this. Or No Man's Sky! Those are some good consolation prizes. And you'll need em. Maybe.

    I'm not knocking a point off for the BS "current day" The Whole World is Californya Bruh politicult crap. Not yet anyway. Let me get 20 hours in. That's when I'll either quit or revise this up. Orrrrr down.

    Also note: this game may get a lot better over the years as fans fix it. It's not like BETHESDA will. They are the anti No Man's Sky shop. Todd Howard is too busy "working" on Starfield 3076.    … Expand
  100. Xavsc47
    Sep 8, 2023
    5
    The game feel and play like a 2010 game with 2015 graphics, very outdated for a AAA game.
    In my opinion, the gameplay is average, main quest is mediocre, the npc are souless, glitchy, with one of the worst AI that i've seen in a very long time.
    The game is not open world, its collection of instances all seperated from eachother, some are poorly randomly generated. This caused me to alway    The game feel and play like a 2010 game with 2015 graphics, very outdated for a AAA game.
    In my opinion, the gameplay is average, main quest is mediocre, the npc are souless, glitchy, with one of the worst AI that i've seen in a very long time.
    The game is not open world, its collection of instances all seperated from eachother, some are poorly randomly generated. This caused me to alway fast travel through the game and have an abusive number of loading screen.
    All of this really broke the immersion of the game for me..

    However i liked the spaceship building and some moment through the game were and quest were great.

    I hope bethesda step up their game quality and gameplay for their next release (elder scrolls 6), because this was not worth of being call a AAA game in 2023    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best Xbox Series X Game of 2023
1
#1 Most Discussed Xbox Series X Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
83

Generally favorable reviews - based on 81 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 69 out of 81
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 81
  3. Negative: 1 out of 81
  1. Gamereactor Finland
    Nov 1, 2023
    70
    It's a big game, but starts way too slowly, and may never get interesting.
    Read full review
  2. Gamereactor Spain
    Oct 16, 2023
    90
    It is true that you'll find a good number of barren wastelands with little to do other than extracting some resources and take off to more interesting places, but again it really depends on how you want to play. There's so much to do, so many systems and abilities to explore, missions to complete, spaceships to loot, and species to catalogue, that I honestly don't think there's anybody who thinks that exploring every square meter of this universe is the better way to enjoy Starfield.
    Read full review
  3. The Loadout
    Oct 15, 2023
    80
    While it has weak spots and doesn’t push many boundaries, Starfield is still an excellent RPG experience. Bethesda has once again mastered the things it built its reputation on – world building, quest design, and deep customization. However, it’s found new things to excel at too, with exciting combat and a novel implementation of New Game Plus.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »