Starfield

 Xbox Series X
User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 6232 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3,626 out of 6232
  2. Mixed: 488 out of 6232
  3. Negative: 2,118 out of 6232
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Exzodium
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    The way Todd Howard was talking, Starfield seemed like it would be a large departure for Bethesda. Turns out it's just fallout in space, but with none of the features that make that IP charming. I went in 6 hours before I got bored and asked for a refund. Not worth 70 to 100 dollars. I would argue that this game is not worth 60 dollars, not unless you pay the modders to fix it and make itThe way Todd Howard was talking, Starfield seemed like it would be a large departure for Bethesda. Turns out it's just fallout in space, but with none of the features that make that IP charming. I went in 6 hours before I got bored and asked for a refund. Not worth 70 to 100 dollars. I would argue that this game is not worth 60 dollars, not unless you pay the modders to fix it and make it enjoyable for those with expectations.… Expand
  2. NinjaFlip11
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    I downloaded this for Series X and bought the premium for 30 bucks. This game has been so misleading by Bethesda. I was incredibly bored. After 10 hours of trying to get into it I just have no Will or desire to play anymore. The graphics were pretty decent but I would rather play Fallout 76 than this. It was a boredom simulator. I played a few side quests, main quests, got into a few shipI downloaded this for Series X and bought the premium for 30 bucks. This game has been so misleading by Bethesda. I was incredibly bored. After 10 hours of trying to get into it I just have no Will or desire to play anymore. The graphics were pretty decent but I would rather play Fallout 76 than this. It was a boredom simulator. I played a few side quests, main quests, got into a few ship fights as well as gun engagements. Looked for stuff on a few planets. It’s full of nothing interesting. After loading into every scene as well as not being able to travel seamlessly I was taken a back how underwhelming it all was. If people enjoy this right on but I just could not get into this at all. Loved all of the Elderscrolls games and Fallout 3 and New Vegas. This was a step back in terms of interesting.… Expand
  3. dannygards
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This HAS to be the end of the Creation engine. The concept of this game is completely ruined by the constant loading, cities artificially boken up into small districts and floors to allow for loading, 30fps, non-existence space exploration by menu and fast travel, baren repetitive planets and lack of vehicles as the engine can't load in assets quickly enough. All these compromises down toThis HAS to be the end of the Creation engine. The concept of this game is completely ruined by the constant loading, cities artificially boken up into small districts and floors to allow for loading, 30fps, non-existence space exploration by menu and fast travel, baren repetitive planets and lack of vehicles as the engine can't load in assets quickly enough. All these compromises down to an prehistoric engine or a lack of technical no how.

    Reviewers are saying you can't compare it to Cyberpunk, Dying Light 2, GTA5 as Starfield has so many systems. Well I'm calling BS. All those games have huge cities that now run at 60fps, look way better, feel better and have far far fewer loading screens. And the supposed multitude of systems that give Starfield a pass?.... a bunch of Mass Effect 1 procedurally generated planets with repetitive linear bases, caves etc. And space exploration via fast travel. Yes It's playable, but set your expectations to something similar but slightly worse than Fallout 4 (as its 30fps), with convoluted systems, and half baked exploration and planets    … Expand
  4. Fallenlords
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    It has possibilities, I imagine with six to twelve months of patches and quality of life improvements it will be a reasonable game. But at the moment it is dull. And certain things don't make much sense. Like in the future we lost the ability to utilise any maps within civilisation centres that tell us where vendors are located etc. The spaceship is nothing but an extended inventory,It has possibilities, I imagine with six to twelve months of patches and quality of life improvements it will be a reasonable game. But at the moment it is dull. And certain things don't make much sense. Like in the future we lost the ability to utilise any maps within civilisation centres that tell us where vendors are located etc. The spaceship is nothing but an extended inventory, you don't really fly it ... you just move it from point A to point B on a starmap. There is the illusion of flying, by moving it around the atmosphere of a planet, with a smattering of chanky space combat.

    Where the game struggles I think is lore ... I have no feeling for it at all. Elder Scrolls/Fallout they crafted a world. Starfield - I don't get any world building sense. Yeah there are things that mark it as a Bethesda game, turrets, consoles, lock picking, inventory management, perks, bugs etc. But I don't care about the lore - everything is so generic. My initial feeling was it played like just any other space game, a lot of other space games have done it a lot better.

    Generally just don't believe the hype with this one, it is boring. There is no 'wow' factor to the game, that blows your socks off. It is just grind and while grind in itself is not too bad if you have a captivating story or interesting characters, this game lacks on both scores.

    Overall has some potential, imagine once PC modders get into it and start showing Bethesda what is actually possible. Then Bethesda take those ideas and filter them into the game over time. Starfield will end up a reasonable game. But at the minute it is seriously lacking something, and all I can think is there isn't much lore or anything.    … Expand
  5. Guipaa
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Venderam sonhos que não se concretizaram. Péssimos gráficos. Jogabilidade ultrapassada. Interações artificiais. Design ultrapassado com excesso de navegação via menu.
  6. chris4ever04
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I will update if the game ever gets good I have enjoyed absolutely nothing so far I’m only a very slow 11 hours in. Controls super clunky, shooting very inconsistent, planets are a joke not real planets literally only a few things to do, I hate the scanning you have to be super close to scan and there’s almost nothing to scan, not like No Man’s Sky where you can scan EVERYTHING. Very very boring I’m trying to push through cause people say it gets better but this is a snooze fest so far I’m at Mars constellation mission. I’m trying to enjoy it but it’s definitely super weird and other games do everything better just haven’t had any fun yet.… Expand
  7. Planetvibz
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Seemingly created by neckbeards who (when not creating Microsoft Office products) enjoy nothing better than a night in sifting through surplus inventory menus and load screens. It’s not ‘Skyrim in Space’, it’s ‘ Death by Menu’.
  8. Salt_AU
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    If you've played Fallout 4 then you can't help but think that Starfield is a heavily modded expansion to that game. The game engine hasn't changed as much as I expected, in places it looks great but overall it looks incredibly dated. Player, companion and NPC animations, many art assets, gun modding, and the overall combat are lifted straight out of Fallout 4 from 2015. The genericIf you've played Fallout 4 then you can't help but think that Starfield is a heavily modded expansion to that game. The game engine hasn't changed as much as I expected, in places it looks great but overall it looks incredibly dated. Player, companion and NPC animations, many art assets, gun modding, and the overall combat are lifted straight out of Fallout 4 from 2015. The generic civilian NPCs are quite literally some of the worst I have seen, and how that got a pass is beyond me. If you have never played Fallout 4 or a Bethesda Game Studios game then I would recommend Starfield for sure, and likely give it a 7 or 8. Unfortunately for me Starfield didn't live up to the hype which is a shame.… Expand
  9. DevilDjinn
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Game lacks any real vision. Feels very bland and uninspired. Does nothing to change the formula up. Space exploration is boring and tedious, gun play is acceptable, graphics are quite dated for a 2023 game.
    Its by no means a bad game, it just isnt a good one. It might be time to look at updating the creation engine Bethesda.
    Very disappointed.
  10. puganj
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    It takes a while to actually pick up.
    It just didnt click with me like skyrim or fallout did
  11. MattchewHawk
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    The diologue in this game feels like it’s been written and performed by a kid. Every time someone speaks its pure cringe. The game is such a drag to play at the start.
    I love the fallout games and Skyrim, and thought it would be largely the same quality. But those games are old, so bad diologue and bugs is forgivable. But not in a game like this. I’m just not enjoying this game at all to    The diologue in this game feels like it’s been written and performed by a kid. Every time someone speaks its pure cringe. The game is such a drag to play at the start.
    I love the fallout games and Skyrim, and thought it would be largely the same quality. But those games are old, so bad diologue and bugs is forgivable. But not in a game like this. I’m just not enjoying this game at all to be honest. It looks nice, but there is zero immersion. In my opinion No Mans Sky, and Elite Dangerous are much, much better games. I really wanted this to be a winner    … Expand
  12. Borgoros
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    Hoped for more, but its my fault for riding the hype train. I really wanted to like this game!
    Not a exciting universe compared to Elder Scrolls or Fallout, wich I love.
    The main story here is dull, looking for too many artefacts, exactly the same, in copy-paste caves/bases, after fast travel after fast travel, running in straight line here and there... And those temples... The skill    Hoped for more, but its my fault for riding the hype train. I really wanted to like this game!
    Not a exciting universe compared to Elder Scrolls or Fallout, wich I love.

    The main story here is dull, looking for too many artefacts, exactly the same, in copy-paste caves/bases, after fast travel after fast travel, running in straight line here and there...
    And those temples...

    The skill tree is bland, with standard physics and human behavoir that have to be learned AGAIN?
    Like the "ability" not to bee heard/seen everywhere, far away, behind walls and obstacles by all enemies? Why can you not just run and hide like a normal human being? Not to mention all those lame characters that talks and talks about so insanely much the same pov monotone way. Again. The combat is ok enough, but a solid step down from Skyrim and Fallout 4.
    Nothing new.

    The technical sci-fi aspect is awesome, but I will rather play Cyberpunk that shows more creativity and atleast some humor, that Starfield really lacks...    … Expand
  13. Steven_PF
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Starfield was a huge disappointment for me. While playing this game, I felt like I was going back 20 years because the mechanics used are so obsolete. I could also talk about the stupid AI, the poverty of exploration (which is mainly done through menus and teleports) and the numerous bugs.
  14. Calculinho
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    It's taken people about 15 years to discover that Bethesda doesn't know how to make RPGs or open world games. He already demonstrated it by destroying the Fallout saga with the third and fourth installments and even with Oblivion and Skyrim they did not know how to continue the bases of Morrowind and opted for a more action-focused approach for the general public.

    They are geniuses at    It's taken people about 15 years to discover that Bethesda doesn't know how to make RPGs or open world games. He already demonstrated it by destroying the Fallout saga with the third and fourth installments and even with Oblivion and Skyrim they did not know how to continue the bases of Morrowind and opted for a more action-focused approach for the general public.

    They are geniuses at developing FPS, but they should leave these types of large-scale games to Obsidian.    … Expand
  15. Wraithe
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I'm sitting here just blown away at how many people post lies about these games reviews, There isn't a snowballs chance in hades this game deserve an 8, 9, or 10. This game is miles wide, and an inch deep. The main storyline is something a teenager in high school could have written better. The graphics are dated and every single face is uncanny. It's giving New World a run for it'sI'm sitting here just blown away at how many people post lies about these games reviews, There isn't a snowballs chance in hades this game deserve an 8, 9, or 10. This game is miles wide, and an inch deep. The main storyline is something a teenager in high school could have written better. The graphics are dated and every single face is uncanny. It's giving New World a run for it's money on actual monster count. The fetch quest concept is over done.… Expand
  16. inzane911
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Fallout without vats. exploring is boring. The sorry is ok. The puppet animations are out of date. Ultimately another Morrowind with a new skin
  17. generalblue162
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Starfield is a below average current gen game. This game barely runs at 30 FPS and you run into a loading screen every 20 seconds or so when you enter a building. Hardly no ship flying and Bethesda decided to use space instead as an extended load screen. The graphics are subpar, kind of looks like a XBox One game and I have noticed quite a lot of pop ins especially in the planet Neon.Starfield is a below average current gen game. This game barely runs at 30 FPS and you run into a loading screen every 20 seconds or so when you enter a building. Hardly no ship flying and Bethesda decided to use space instead as an extended load screen. The graphics are subpar, kind of looks like a XBox One game and I have noticed quite a lot of pop ins especially in the planet Neon. The gun play is alright, but nothing I haven't seen before and sometimes enemies magically spawn right in front of you. This game gave me the urge to play No Man's Sky again, so I downloaded it, and let me tell you that's a great game compared to this.… Expand
  18. Orcflesh
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    Perk system is awful, UI is awful, inventory awful, space flight and combat awful, combat has problems: example bullet sponge enemies: dumb AI: buggy physics: clipping where I can see an enemy's legs under cover but when you shoot them they hit an invisible cover box: Graphics are **** planets have copy and paste buildings where even enemy placement is identical to the duplicate buildingPerk system is awful, UI is awful, inventory awful, space flight and combat awful, combat has problems: example bullet sponge enemies: dumb AI: buggy physics: clipping where I can see an enemy's legs under cover but when you shoot them they hit an invisible cover box: Graphics are **** planets have copy and paste buildings where even enemy placement is identical to the duplicate building I'd previously visited. Your companions are just walking storage boxes. Dialogue is boring. Most of all it is not an RPG. Balders Gate 3 here I come… Expand
  19. BestKill_Gamer
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Muito hype gerado encima desse game devido ao marketing mentiroso da MS para enganar os consumidores, até manipulação de nota ocorreu isso já demonstra que nem a própria MS acreditava no seu jogo, O jogo é fraco você não se conecta ao jogo tudo no jogo é genérico IA é burra tiroteio fraco NPC que são verdadeiros memes gráficos de 360 rodando a míseros 30 FPS até no Series X sem falar nosMuito hype gerado encima desse game devido ao marketing mentiroso da MS para enganar os consumidores, até manipulação de nota ocorreu isso já demonstra que nem a própria MS acreditava no seu jogo, O jogo é fraco você não se conecta ao jogo tudo no jogo é genérico IA é burra tiroteio fraco NPC que são verdadeiros memes gráficos de 360 rodando a míseros 30 FPS até no Series X sem falar nos loading uma vergonha esse jogo total frustração, nem deveriam dizer esse jogo é de nova geração muito menos de "jogo da década".… Expand
  20. Instalocker
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    Since bought it for 35€, it’s ok. The game is as far away from goty as Todd‘s promises from truth
  21. DavidDiaz
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Game about the space without the space. They could've added at least fake loading screens to create a feeling of flight, but instead we see black loading screens over and over, it kill immersion completely. Facial animation is terrible, graphics looks dated, planets exploration is pointless. It could be a good game maybe 10 years ago, but not today.
  22. skiabox
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    The game is totally unplayable on consoles.
    It is only running at 30 fps.
    This is the first game with 30 fps that causes me dizziness and nausea.
    I have never seen so bad 30 fps performance.
    For example I had no problem playing Gotham Knights, which is also running on 30 fps.
    Do yourself a favor and don’t bother install it, unless they fix that!
  23. makarasz
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Very poor attention to details for a modern production; feels very 2005. Poor characters (NPCs). Impossible to remove pronouns. Way to woke for normal production - feels they had an agenda to push, rather than focusing on what matters in a game. You can choose which way paper roll hangs in the toilet - which raised my rating from 3 to 4 Play BG3 instead - this one is not worth a penny in 2023
  24. Fortetsanos
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I was so excited about Starfield since the game's presentation in June that I pre-ordered the game to have Early Access. Although it took me a few weeks to see if this game would convince me that it's another Bethesda masterpiece, it ended up disappointing me.

    The exploration is limited by useless boundaries. 80% of the planets are empty. Buggy NPCs It took me 3 times of reloading a    I was so excited about Starfield since the game's presentation in June that I pre-ordered the game to have Early Access. Although it took me a few weeks to see if this game would convince me that it's another Bethesda masterpiece, it ended up disappointing me.

    The exploration is limited by useless boundaries.
    80% of the planets are empty.
    Buggy NPCs
    It took me 3 times of reloading a mission in order to proceed.
    Graphics are outdated and the excuse of it being a Bethesda game is stupid.
    The story is short and the intro is tiring...
    Bad writing, especially during some specific dialogues.

    Positives:

    - Combat and guns feel great.
    - Some missions are fun to play
    - Spaceship customization
    - Space combat and some random encounters.    … Expand
  25. Solidsnake00901
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Maybe I was expecting too much of this next-gen exclusive but nothing about it feels next-gen at all. 30 FPS with tons of loading screens It's basically fallout with a space background. Something about empty procedurally generated worlds just doesn't excite me and the lack of vehicles sucks. The space exploration is mostly just combat It's all fast travel and cutscenes.
  26. danuffo
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    NO tiene doblaje latinoamericano; la traducción tiene palabras extrañas como "Ostras", "Mola", "Pero vamos", "vosotros", etc.

    En pleno año 2023 se le da preferencia sólo al público ibérico (y al gringo), viniendo de Xbox que acostumbra localizar sus juegos.
  27. fabiannolive
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Uma grande decepção. O jogo é bastante superficial e os desenvolvedores camuflaram essa preguiça de desenvolvimento debaixo de textos, quantidade de recursos e outras mediocridades que enganam os jogadores. A movimentação do personagem é rasa, qualquer movimentação mais rápida causa queda de frames no console series x e poderia listar literalmente centenas de detalhes que tornam esse jogoUma grande decepção. O jogo é bastante superficial e os desenvolvedores camuflaram essa preguiça de desenvolvimento debaixo de textos, quantidade de recursos e outras mediocridades que enganam os jogadores. A movimentação do personagem é rasa, qualquer movimentação mais rápida causa queda de frames no console series x e poderia listar literalmente centenas de detalhes que tornam esse jogo um jogo normal. Estou dando a nota 4 porque esse jogo não merece ser a cara da microsoft. Pode ser o melhor jogo da Bethesda, não passa disso.… Expand
  28. n0shiPL
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Unfortunately, a very poor start. The game looks pretty good on XSX, although the close-up textures and character models seem outdated and underdeveloped. AI, unfortunately, is absolutely reprehensible. Opponents lose attention, run away, reset their interest in the player when they bump into a wall. The game's menus are very unreadable and unintuitive, and unfortunately, space travel isUnfortunately, a very poor start. The game looks pretty good on XSX, although the close-up textures and character models seem outdated and underdeveloped. AI, unfortunately, is absolutely reprehensible. Opponents lose attention, run away, reset their interest in the player when they bump into a wall. The game's menus are very unreadable and unintuitive, and unfortunately, space travel is 98% about fast travel. The plot is not captivating, I feel that it is very stilted and does not sufficiently develop any threads, from the beginning I got the impression of unnecessary haste and lack of world-building. The game is a typical mediocre, which may be worth buying on promotion, unfortunately for me even this will not encourage me to finish.… Expand
  29. rsent
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Pros: Ship customizations, some ability and weapons customizations, Decent graphics, 3rd person view is good, minimal bugs

    Cons:
    -Story takes long to catch up and nothing memorable for a AAA title.
    -Graphics are not at the level of a AAA current gen title honestly. Some models look good but facial expressions, hair, vegetation, and others look 100% last gen. Its really a last gen game. Must be an old game engine that hasn't been updated enough to use modern techniques and hardware.
    -Because of last point, the loading times suck on the Series X. They're not taking advantage of the disk throughput of the system.
    -In light of last point, Space travel is immersion breaking and not memorable for a AAA currrent gen title. You load into a spaceship, to travel, have to fast travel basically to get into a planet and load into a planet. Its really immersion breaking.
    -Planets are essentially empty spaces.

    In summary; they could have made a better game if they focused on creating a few planets(8) that you can actually fly to in real time. Invested more in the story, and updating their game engine to utilize new streaming methods for loading data, amongst other things.    … Expand
  30. magoowashington
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Just want to play because of the story that I thought would have a more Christian theme but the faction that believes in a single God are the evil ones and sksk marauders while the atheist illuminists are the good guys, they don't even hide anymore would have been revealed if the game was good but it's bad.
  31. Ayvaza
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    What else could someone expect from the vast size of the cosmos... its a whole lot of boring nothing. i dont even want to spend much time explaining why this game is boring, so in short summary:
    The open world is filled with ugly looking ressources and wildlife, which can be hunted/gathered and scanned, anyone could build a better world with a map builder on any game, i even remember    What else could someone expect from the vast size of the cosmos... its a whole lot of boring nothing. i dont even want to spend much time explaining why this game is boring, so in short summary:
    The open world is filled with ugly looking ressources and wildlife, which can be hunted/gathered and scanned, anyone could build a better world with a map builder on any game, i even remember doing a better job at farcry2 or 3 (dont remember anymore), where the maps actually looked pretty.
    So in all that boring nothingness, you get a few outposts/settlements/buildings, where you can loot and explore, guess what, opening the door will require to wait a few seconds for you to enter, its probably just a small loading screen. after entering it, you will get a whole lot of items you can loot, there comes the other thing which made me hate the gameplay, 135kg where i can store stuff, and its already full after like 5mins of exploring a building. so you either have to overload your companion or run back to your ship and store it there and come back later. but dont worry, thats not the only quality of life feature which is missing, the game also doesnt have a map (i mean a technology advanced enough for space travel but not maps), it also doesnt have a minimap.
    the fasttravel system is complicated, you have to look at the location with your scanner and use fasttravel.

    - no normal fasttravel
    - no map
    - no minimap
    - super bland coloring / watching the game is enough to bore the sht out of you
    - boring introduction
    - boring and ugly world
    - the moment you start enjoying the exploration , your bag gets full

    i for my part didnt enjoy it, i bought the preorder pack for over 100bucks, got a refund, played it on the gamepass and still didnt enjoy it and quit early on.
    never gonna trust any of the gameplay reviews again
    looks like bethesda is hoping that the modders fix their game, or they wanna implement features like maps, higher storage capacity with a paid dlc    … Expand
  32. Sharpruben
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    The game is very slow and does not look very good Also it will never be a contender for game of the year
  33. sg1995
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Another overhyped disappointment sadly.

    It's loading screen central. Landing on a planet. Taking off from a planet. Flying between planets. Getting into certain buildings, getting to certain areas within a city. All loading screens. Let's be honest here, this isn't an open world game at all. You don't feel like you're free to explore because everything is stuck behind multiple loading    Another overhyped disappointment sadly.

    It's loading screen central. Landing on a planet. Taking off from a planet. Flying between planets. Getting into certain buildings, getting to certain areas within a city. All loading screens. Let's be honest here, this isn't an open world game at all. You don't feel like you're free to explore because everything is stuck behind multiple loading screens and closed off sections.

    A real shame, especially when it comes to flying the spaceship because they look great, the personalisation and interiors are cool, and the fighting is fun. But that's limited to the emptiness of space.

    A lot of mechanics in the game are also pointless and retract from the experience. The main one being O2/CO2 levels where you can't even run for more than 10 seconds without getting health damage. What's the point of that? That's not fun for anyone.

    Graphically it's a nice game, and there was clearly a lot of time and effort put into the design of objects and the world in general. But the stale gameplay, constant load screens & menus - just don't make it worth it.    … Expand
  34. Aegishjalmur
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    J'aimerais tellement aimer ce jeu... Mais je ne peux pas, il y a des défauts qui me cassent l'immersion tel l'exploration, la pertinence de l'IA, l'écriture et ses conséquences, les écrans de chargement, le faux monde ouvert et.... tous les défauts des jeux Bethesda : inventaire, moteur, etc... je le trouve moins bien réussi que ses ainés, clairement.
    J'espère qu'ils vont s'inspirer de    J'aimerais tellement aimer ce jeu... Mais je ne peux pas, il y a des défauts qui me cassent l'immersion tel l'exploration, la pertinence de l'IA, l'écriture et ses conséquences, les écrans de chargement, le faux monde ouvert et.... tous les défauts des jeux Bethesda : inventaire, moteur, etc... je le trouve moins bien réussi que ses ainés, clairement.
    J'espère qu'ils vont s'inspirer de Hello games pour améliorer leur jeu... et ne pas compter que sur les mods... voire même de rendre ces mods payant sur pc.
    j'y vois mal sur Xbox series X    … Expand
  35. StudentCritic20
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Thankful got to play from Game Pass, would regret if I had paid full price. Bethesda hasn't learned a thing from their mistakes. The opening is boring and I had already wished for a way to skip past the set up. The setting and characters you meet have nothing to them, just felt generic. The space combat was lack luster, if you played the Mothership Zeta DLC for Fallout 3, it's just likeThankful got to play from Game Pass, would regret if I had paid full price. Bethesda hasn't learned a thing from their mistakes. The opening is boring and I had already wished for a way to skip past the set up. The setting and characters you meet have nothing to them, just felt generic. The space combat was lack luster, if you played the Mothership Zeta DLC for Fallout 3, it's just like that. The combat feels off, guns and melee lack weight. The dialogue has me remembering the way Fallout 4 was, just a lot of nothing in conversations, the only improvement in conversations is the silent character is back. The game looks nice, but that's all i can say is positive. The game is a huge disappointment.… Expand
  36. Czibo
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Nothing new Bethesda fails again. Starting with a bad price-quality ratio. What we got was a new Skyrim with a buggy, weak main plot, mediocre graphics and hideous character faces. The map, UI, AI and expansion are pennies than TES, WHICH IS SIMPLY STUPID. Ship combat and gunplay are at best done at an average level. What I can praise is the ship building system and some characterNothing new Bethesda fails again. Starting with a bad price-quality ratio. What we got was a new Skyrim with a buggy, weak main plot, mediocre graphics and hideous character faces. The map, UI, AI and expansion are pennies than TES, WHICH IS SIMPLY STUPID. Ship combat and gunplay are at best done at an average level. What I can praise is the ship building system and some character development elements. 4/10… Expand
  37. gre7en
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    The game seems to be overambitious and in the end just fell flat. It's mediocre compared to "what could have been" that they promised. I'm at around mid game and don't know if I want to push more time into it.
  38. Jefferson_ROCK
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Não sei se chamo de DLC de Fallout 4 ou se chamo de simulador de caminha em vários planetas, porque é zuado essa parte da "exploração planetária" . Bethesda precisa desapegar dessa Creation engine e evoluir, um game onde há vários diálogos NPC's sem expressão tiram toda a emoção do game.
  39. Saminator99
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    If the game is loaded with loading screen then why on earth it couldn't run in 60fps on the Series X. 20 years In making and we get this, how is this ok? We live in a world today where the right is wrong and the wrong is right and there are plenty of wrong in this game. Its simply unfinished. Congratulations Microsoft for ruining another great developer bravo
  40. chretrogames
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Lo que pudo ser y no fue.

    Puntos importantes. Jugabilidad: tosca, se siente anticuado. Hemos retrocedido dos generaciones. BSO: Muy bueno, es el Oasis en el desierto. Te sumerge de lleno en un escenario galáctico. Estilo gráfico: flaquean y engrandece a la vez... Carencias que se notan los años de desarrollo. Optimización: rendimiento nefasto, tanto en mi Series X como en PC de alto    Lo que pudo ser y no fue.

    Puntos importantes.
    Jugabilidad: tosca, se siente anticuado. Hemos retrocedido dos generaciones. BSO: Muy bueno, es el Oasis en el desierto. Te sumerge de lleno en un escenario galáctico. Estilo gráfico: flaquean y engrandece a la vez... Carencias que se notan los años de desarrollo. Optimización: rendimiento nefasto, tanto en mi Series X como en PC de alto calibre. Aparte de tener Popping que inhibe la experiencia de juego.

    NO Recomendando por el precio PVP, esperaros a una buena rebaja para jugarlo.    … Expand
  41. Twonumo
    Sep 12, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A ideia do jogo é boa,em questão de história não duvido que seja bom. Porém o jogo tá injogavel na versão PC. Não faz sentido um jogo que não tem o gráfico tão avançado estar travando tanto e com quedas bruscas de FPS ainda mais levando-se em conta que jogos como Rede Dead Redemption 2 rodem bem e com folga no mesmo Hardware. Pelas reviews positivas realmente achei que poderia jogar ,mas me enganei. Bethesda conseguiu novamente a façanha de hypar um jogo e falhar na execução.… Expand
  42. DBohuslavschi
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    The game is dull. There's no other way around it. I've never played any mainline Bethesda games like Skyrim or Fallout 4. As such, this is my first "Bethesda RPG" and, I got to say, I'm not impressed.

    First of all, there's a general lack of attention to detail in this game. Don't get this confused with lack of polish. I run a AMD 3700X CPU with a NVIDIA 2070S. The game itself runs very    The game is dull. There's no other way around it. I've never played any mainline Bethesda games like Skyrim or Fallout 4. As such, this is my first "Bethesda RPG" and, I got to say, I'm not impressed.

    First of all, there's a general lack of attention to detail in this game. Don't get this confused with lack of polish. I run a AMD 3700X CPU with a NVIDIA 2070S. The game itself runs very well; very smooth, no bugs, glitches, FPS drops or stuttering. However, there's next to no attention to detail. For example, there aren't any foot trails in sand or mud; if you throw a grenade into water, there'll just be an basic explosion instead of a water explosion; there's no change in water if you look down at your feet when you're walking in it, there's no destructible aspects to the environment... stuff like that.

    Then there's the "space exploration". This is the most pathetic thing about this game. You'd assume that it'd be more like Star Citizen than friggin' LEGO STAR WARS THE SKYWALKER SAGA, but you'd be wrong. In short, in games like Star Citizen and No Man's Sky, the transition from boarding your starship, blasting off into space, traveling to a different planet and landing on that planet is seamless. You can do it all yourself during gameplay. This game is not like that. It's almost exactly like LEGO Star Wars: The Skywalker Saga.

    In this game, you get in your ship then press a button to take off. You watch a cutscene, the game loads, then you're in space. Once you're in space, you bring up a menu, select your destination, than select "travel". A cutscene plays, the game loads, and then you're around a different planet. To land, guess what? You guessed it. You open up your map, select your destination, press a button. A cutscene plays, the game loads, another cutscene plays and you're on the planet in your ship. Oh and, by the way, this is the most immersive way of doing it. It's completely unnecessary to go into space at all. Once you've landed somewhere, you can literally just fast travel there in a menu. No starship, no space travel... nothing.

    I'll be honest, although the game world is more expansive in this game than LEGO Star Wars: The Skywalker Saga, I prefer the latter. Somehow, the Lego game has a more seamless and immersive travel system than this game even though it's nearly identical. I say this because, depending on where you are in the Lego game, you can seamlessly jump from one planet to another without using menus. If you've played the Lego, game you know what I'm talking about. If you don't, look it up.

    Now here's the thing, space exploration is just a part of this game. I bought it for the space exploration and I'm willing to bet a lot of other people are going to as well. With that being said, how is the rest of the game despite the space exploration's shortcomings. The answer: not much better.

    Credit where credit is due. The music is phenomenal and sound design is very well done. Voice acting, ambiance, space ambiance, running, clambering, shooting... all very immersive from an audio perspective.

    The art design is similarly unique enough to be memorable and nice to look at. The character customizer, weapon designs, costume designs, worlds, environments, buildings, props... all very well done.

    That's where my praise ends.

    Graphically, the game is mediocre. Not the best, not the worst. Like I mentioned before, although the art direction is good, there's a general lack of attention to detail that really draws me in. NPC animations are particularly awful. I'd honestly be a lot more critical of the game's graphics if the game didn't run as well as it did. Like I said before, real smooth performance across the board.

    When it comes to story, I haven't gotten far and it's not the worst in the world. However, from a presentation and entertainment perspective, it's lame. It's the typical RPG-style storytelling of walking up to a character, pressing E to talk to them, and then wasting the next 10 minutes selecting dialogue options and watching a medium close up shot of some NPC talking. Again, I know that some people don't have a problem with this. I do. I find it boring and tedious. The only game I don't mind it so much is Cyberpunk 2077 and Deus Ex: Human Revolution & Mankind Divided.

    Lastly, the gameplay. Again, typical, tedious and unoriginal RPG shooter gameplay. Each weapon has a bunch of numbers and every enemy has a rank. Depending on your weapon and the enemy, combat usually involves hosing down enemies until their health bar disappears. I got a lot of flashbacks to when I played Tom Clancy's The Division.

    All in all, the game is an unoriginal, lazy, and boring slog. Certain aspects are fine but unlike titles like the aforementioned Cyberpunk 2077 or the new Deus Ex games, this game doesn't have enough flair or fun factor to keep my interest.    … Expand
  43. Rapidfire77
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Say what you want, but this game lacks that certain "it", that compels you to play it. Plus it's visually 2010. Disappointed
  44. HellaTactical
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    So many loading screens, Boring quests, 30fps, boring story, boring planets. All the other games maps had heart, 1000 randomly generated "planets" don't. Huge disappointment, but it was expected from how little they showed.
  45. Zeon1982
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    I am very disappointed with Starfield. It's a very well made game but it lacks the soul of previous Bethesda titles. Starfield didn't grab me like Fallout 4 did. I was so immersed in Fallout 4 and Starfield did the opposite. I played for about ten hours expecting the game to get better but it didn't. The game felt very bland. Also I spent about 30% of the game in loading screens.
  46. Damo226
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    I've been waiting for this game for what seems like decades, Now if you like Bethesda gamed (which I do) this game could be for you, but it fails to grab your attention in the beginning as the likes of skyrim or it's predecessors before it. It takes until new game plus to actually become worth a playthrough and the side missions are more entertaining then the main story. 4/10 is about theI've been waiting for this game for what seems like decades, Now if you like Bethesda gamed (which I do) this game could be for you, but it fails to grab your attention in the beginning as the likes of skyrim or it's predecessors before it. It takes until new game plus to actually become worth a playthrough and the side missions are more entertaining then the main story. 4/10 is about the best I can give this sadly.… Expand
  47. DoubleoSeven
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    If this was a last gen game it would’ve been a 9 but my good this game feels and looks so dated, I love Bethesda games but this right here is a low. First of all the amount of loading you do during this game is crazy. The graphics is crap, I’m on a series X with LG C2 and this game looks like a cross gen 360- Xbox one game there is some parts that look great but 95% trash but I won’t evenIf this was a last gen game it would’ve been a 9 but my good this game feels and looks so dated, I love Bethesda games but this right here is a low. First of all the amount of loading you do during this game is crazy. The graphics is crap, I’m on a series X with LG C2 and this game looks like a cross gen 360- Xbox one game there is some parts that look great but 95% trash but I won’t even knock a Bethesda game for that. What really does it for me is the AI, My god they’re retarded it’s like redfall in space. update your like TOM! Why the hell isn’t there vehicles in this game? Got to walk 20 miles with a slow jet pack… Expand
  48. liamexe
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    this game is one of the 1st major game releases ive ever played on launch and despite the critisim on the last game i wasnt too intrested but hey a sci-fi space exploration game sounds fun.
    its buggy
    its story is generic
    and in general its not enjoyable would i play it again? if i would forced too or if im getting paid.
  49. NaGeJo
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. After 50 hours of play:
    This is not the game of the decade, and not the game of the year. Definitely not.
    This is a $25 half-baked game. A Beta version.
    Zero optimization, crashing sound and picture on a relatively powerful computer. Black screens, no sound, 30 sec delay sound etc. (other games with similar or higher machine requirements run smoothly)
    Usual Bethesda engine bugs, flickering objects but fewer.
    Stupid UI.
    Unkillable main NPCs.
    Fast travel is good you can fast travel everywhere and at least you don't have to look at empty boring ugly pixel piles, no need to wanrering, exploring, no need to look at cut-scenes and it only loads once for minutes, not three or four times.
    The missions are primitive, can be broken, some of them bugged
    The skill system is basically good, but could use a lot of fine tuning.
    The inventory system is not well thought out and breakable.
    E.g. Your ship's cargo hold is full, so you throw away stuff & resoursces on your ship.
    When you rebuild your ship all the stuff on your ship goes into the cargo hold. Ooverloaded it multiple times (but still funcioning).
    Every time you rebuild, the ship's equipment is regenerated. What you can sell in the spaceport kiosk... you rebuild and sell, rebuild and sell again...

    Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
    Tell me lies
    Tell me, tell me lies
    Oh no-no, you can't disguise

    Good because you can easily copy the skyrim mods and soon the game will be playable thanks to the modding community.    … Expand
  50. GonEr
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    I went in expecting the best and wow. did it not deliver at all. this game ran slow, there was pop in, constant screens, terrible inventory. I do not own a playstation, but this was the game that would keep me in the ecosystem. and i think i might switch and go try some spiderman or something. its a hassle to pull our 500 dollars again lol. Yeah the game over is underwhelming not worth theI went in expecting the best and wow. did it not deliver at all. this game ran slow, there was pop in, constant screens, terrible inventory. I do not own a playstation, but this was the game that would keep me in the ecosystem. and i think i might switch and go try some spiderman or something. its a hassle to pull our 500 dollars again lol. Yeah the game over is underwhelming not worth the constellation edition i bought… Expand
  51. Prawy_126
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    Gra nie spełnia tego co twórcy zapowiadali nie ma swobodnej eksploracji tylko same ekrany wczytywania niby miała to być gra nowej generacji a wygląda z mechanik na grę na 7 generację konsol ps3 i Xboxa 360 jedynie grafika może trochę bardziej przypomina z generacji do przodu czyli ps4 i Xbox one ale naprawdę nie wiem czym ludzie się zachwycają
  52. TastieToasty
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    they laugh about you guys praising these modern **** games.

    congrats to all the consumers that have defended this game, you are the reason the industry will never change.
  53. phylokes
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Boring game, I could not enter a planet! The planets look like a gif in a background space. Disappointed.
  54. fharscool
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    O jogo mais aguardado com certeza... cheio de promessas de uma grandiosa exploração em 1000 planetas...
    Chegada a hora, o jogo se mostrou com uma boa historia, e um ótimo visão realista do espaço, mas só isso. O resto é é resumido em um jogo cheio de problemas de texturas, Bugs grotescos, loads a todo momento, IA fraquíssima, modelagem de personagens de geração passada ou menos, os    O jogo mais aguardado com certeza... cheio de promessas de uma grandiosa exploração em 1000 planetas...
    Chegada a hora, o jogo se mostrou com uma boa historia, e um ótimo visão realista do espaço, mas só isso. O resto é é resumido em um jogo cheio de problemas de texturas, Bugs grotescos, loads a todo momento, IA fraquíssima, modelagem de personagens de geração passada ou menos, os planetas sem vida certamente nao precisavam estarem ali, ja que nao se acha nada e nao servem para nada, as viagens espaciais nem precisaram existir ja que os loads tiram toda a experiência de uma expedição interplanetária, pois nao se pode ir diretamente ja que chegando, o planeta nao passa de textura, é necessário pousos a todo momento, o deslocamento se resume a loads disfarçados de dobra ou apenas disfarçado de cena em cgi.

    Se usassem a filosofia de que "Menos é mais" com certeza muito seria melhorado, mas devido a ambição da bethesda e de todd Howard, foi entregue um jogo que se esperava tudo, apenas 10% foi entregue.    … Expand
  55. Diego4700
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    O jogo em si não eh ruim, tem gráficos bons porém modelagem de personagens muito ultrapassada, acredito que a decepção de ver oque foi recebido comparando com oque foi prometido
  56. CavexNero1
    Sep 10, 2023
    4
    Jogo medíocre com gráficos de ps3 na verdade tem jogos de ps3 com gráficos melhores uma bugação fora do normal história chata o marketing desse jogo foi um dos mais mentirosos da história tela de loading em tudo na moral q vergonha é esse jogo as notas de crítica especializada foi com certeza manipulada comprada pela Microsoft e isso e ridícula até pq se formos analisar esse jogo está piorJogo medíocre com gráficos de ps3 na verdade tem jogos de ps3 com gráficos melhores uma bugação fora do normal história chata o marketing desse jogo foi um dos mais mentirosos da história tela de loading em tudo na moral q vergonha é esse jogo as notas de crítica especializada foi com certeza manipulada comprada pela Microsoft e isso e ridícula até pq se formos analisar esse jogo está pior q o Siberpunk no lançamento q também era muito bugado mais pelo menos graficamente é muito superior a essa bosta e foi massacrado pele crítica com rasão e inaceitável um jogo sai bugado desse jeito mais aí o starfild saí muito mais feio e até mais bugado d q ele e tem essa média alta ae lógico q foi comprada sem falar q o jogo foi avaliado por pessoas escolhidas a dedo pela Microsoft cara na moral q vergonha por isso q o Xbox é e sempre será o lanterna de gerações… Expand
  57. Tpach_Aaron
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Mucho hype para nada, tiene detalles gráficos hermosos en edificios y una iluminación muy buena, explorar en ese universo al Principio fue divertido y lleno de misterio, pasando las horas fue aburrido y repetitivo, es un juego que quiere abarcar tanto que no termina por concretar. Independiente de todos los fallos técnicos, bugs y demás, es un juego que solo vale la pena jugar en gamepass, no vale lo que cuesta y sumando que el disco es una llave no trae el juego completo la edición física es un pisapapeles. Decepcionado … Expand
  58. m2d2
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This is not a next-gen game. This would have been a nice Bethesda game maybe 15 years ago, but that's all it is: an old Bethesda game. They reskinned Fallout4 and Skyrim for space. There's literally space shout magic. Nothing like FosRohDah in space, I guess, but it's boooooring. Games that came out in 2015 look so much better than this. The writing is dull and the companions are just asThis is not a next-gen game. This would have been a nice Bethesda game maybe 15 years ago, but that's all it is: an old Bethesda game. They reskinned Fallout4 and Skyrim for space. There's literally space shout magic. Nothing like FosRohDah in space, I guess, but it's boooooring. Games that came out in 2015 look so much better than this. The writing is dull and the companions are just as bland as they were in Skyrim with the same 5 phrases every time they talk. There are so many actually good space exploration games out there. This is not one of them.… Expand
  59. DemonSoull
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    esse jogo foi projetado a mais de 20 anos para entrega um jogo totalmente vazio com graficos de xbox 360 e ainda totalmente planetas vazios com npc bugados realmente nao sei oque se passa na cabeça da bethesda nao adianta querer defender nao mesmo eu tendo o xbox series x o jogo esta muito mal otimizado realmente foi uma grande decepçao
  60. Sesam007
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    As the game looks nice and the story has been great so far, inventory management is horrible. Not only that bugs, Bethesda has always presented games always in this state. The game is not what they promise, millions of worlds to explore…
  61. RamXT4
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    lot of bugs, bad textures, npcs are bad, guns are powerful, and 2 much money, difinitly the worst game EVER, 4/10
  62. GamoPedia
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Pros and Cons List:

    Pros: 1. World Design Is Great. 2. On Foot Gameplay Is Amazing. 3. Building/Upgraging Ship is Amazing. Cons: 1. Very Very Slow Start. 2. It takes 10-12 hours to understand the game. 3. Dull Characters Animations. 4. Brain dead AI. 5. A lot of Bugs Everywhere. 6. Everything is loading screen. 7. Dull Space Combat. 8. Travelling of foot is annoying and frustrating. 9.    Pros and Cons List:

    Pros:
    1. World Design Is Great.
    2. On Foot Gameplay Is Amazing.
    3. Building/Upgraging Ship is Amazing.


    Cons:
    1. Very Very Slow Start.
    2. It takes 10-12 hours to understand the game.
    3. Dull Characters Animations.
    4. Brain dead AI.
    5. A lot of Bugs Everywhere.
    6. Everything is loading screen.
    7. Dull Space Combat.
    8. Travelling of foot is annoying and frustrating.
    9. Bathesda's Typical Lackluster Story.
    10. Addition of Non Sense LGBTQ Pronouns.
    11. 30fps on Xbox Series X/S.

    Note:
    Good thing is that Starfield is available on Gamepass my recommendation is to play this game on Gamepass just like i did and don't waste your money.    … Expand
  63. Tommygun02
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    This game feels like if you got fallout and removed all of the fun and interesting weapons,enemies and characters and then made fast travel something that you need to do every other minute. Gunplay is solid as expected.unintresting characters and storyline. Poor pacing. Lackluster spaceflight with no ability to land or take off or explore the planet freely from city to wasteland. This isThis game feels like if you got fallout and removed all of the fun and interesting weapons,enemies and characters and then made fast travel something that you need to do every other minute. Gunplay is solid as expected.unintresting characters and storyline. Poor pacing. Lackluster spaceflight with no ability to land or take off or explore the planet freely from city to wasteland. This is basically just a loading simulator with good gunplay.… Expand
  64. DuckTape9
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Aside from the game constantly crashing, the exploration (the biggest part of a space travel game) has very little to it and gets extremely boring hours later.
  65. yuribelmont
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Muitas mentiras da bethesda, esperava poder viajar entre planetas livremente, não apenas clicar em um png e ir ao local, o combate não evoluiu nada, continua o mesmo do ps3, e o que falar dos personagens, são porcos, a bethesda deveria evoluir e não ficar na mesma por anos… Expand
  66. Littlechinaboy
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Would have been a good game ten years back. Absolutely outdated. Many of the communicated features are not implemented in the game.
  67. Mario9767
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Juego aburridisimo y hay muchos irrealismos y muchos mundos vacios, dinero tirado a la basura
  68. Urodith
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    juego con un gran universo, pero poco aprovechado. prometia mucho, con cosas como no man sky de la exploracion, el uso de la nave que es casi nulo, por no hablar de la infinidad de bugs que un mod de la comunidad ya arregla bastantes.

    Bethesda no es ni la mitad de lo que fue
  69. ThatGuyMan
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This game story is a sleeper and the combat is lame at start but it gets better as you continue. The main worlds have solid life but other side planets are kinda lame tbh. Some of the scenery and physics are solid also. But the NPC are TERRIBLE, when I pull a gun out and shoot it near people no one reacts they only react if you start killing people as they should.
  70. taino_10
    Sep 12, 2023
    4
    The story starts extremely slow, there's alot of bugs still even tho Bethesda promised a game "without bugs" loading screens can be very annoying, graphical wise its doesn't scream im next gen, very repetitive it can be boring over time. Even the npcs are the same you will find the same npc multiple times on an area I meant more than one of the same. THIS GAME NEEDS TO BE POLISHED to be onThe story starts extremely slow, there's alot of bugs still even tho Bethesda promised a game "without bugs" loading screens can be very annoying, graphical wise its doesn't scream im next gen, very repetitive it can be boring over time. Even the npcs are the same you will find the same npc multiple times on an area I meant more than one of the same. THIS GAME NEEDS TO BE POLISHED to be on a better state but its way better than redfall and maybe if they do a 60fps option might make it run better … Expand
  71. AlexDRX
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    No sense of exploration. Empty Planets. Bad IA. Loading screen after loading screen. Good Game if u focus on main quest.
  72. Soulbard221
    Sep 9, 2023
    4
    Lacks any memorable characters or quests. Is very well designed, and almost seemless, but lacks any bit of quest depth, thought, or replayability. It is a Bethesda game by name and engine alone.
  73. robbaldwin420
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    At least with the suckers paying to play 5 days early i could get a feel for it, and a well deserved refund before the 2 hour deadline.
  74. Kevencr7
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    O jogo é cheio de bugs. Estou jogando ele já tem 17h já fiz o modo história tem uns cenários muitos bons, mas mesmo assim ele possui muitos loading e um sistema meio complexo. Quando estou conversando com um personagem, do nada aparece outro na minha frente com a cara de assustado, aí ele ficava dando voltas em mim. Tem inimigo que tava tão bugado que eu acabei gastando mais de 1 pente deO jogo é cheio de bugs. Estou jogando ele já tem 17h já fiz o modo história tem uns cenários muitos bons, mas mesmo assim ele possui muitos loading e um sistema meio complexo. Quando estou conversando com um personagem, do nada aparece outro na minha frente com a cara de assustado, aí ele ficava dando voltas em mim. Tem inimigo que tava tão bugado que eu acabei gastando mais de 1 pente de bala com ele, no final eu acabei morrendo mas depois eu consegui derrotar ele novamente. Enfim. Foi prometido muito e entregou quase nada. Então a minha nota também será quase nada. 4.… Expand
  75. KB16
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Hate that you cant travel to planets directly and that you have to fast travel to them. It takes away the feeling of adventure of getting in your star ship and literally go anywhere you can make it. Also for a 3080 this game looked weird especially the scenes with they're helmets on the characters looked like literal clown fish. Boring Dialogue too.
  76. Moondragon66
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Game needs to be run on a top of the line PC, and still has issues. Furthermore, the planets are mostly empty. The developers defend this by saying when explorers went to the moon, there wasn't anything there. Well yeah, but this is a game and it needs to prioritize fun over being realistic. It's the kind of game that I could forget in a month. It's as if I was asked how that third game ofGame needs to be run on a top of the line PC, and still has issues. Furthermore, the planets are mostly empty. The developers defend this by saying when explorers went to the moon, there wasn't anything there. Well yeah, but this is a game and it needs to prioritize fun over being realistic. It's the kind of game that I could forget in a month. It's as if I was asked how that third game of solitaire was three weeks ago...I wouldn't remember it. That's Starfield. 5/10 and -1 for asking for pronouns.… Expand
  77. bjxxn
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    I Have over 20 hours in and the game is just pretty average. I love all the options for fast traveling, but the lack of being able to free roam on foot or in your ship is extremely limited. In a game that was advertised as a space explorer there is very little to explore. Also the amount of loading screens is absurd. Every time you walk through a door to a building you have a load screen,I Have over 20 hours in and the game is just pretty average. I love all the options for fast traveling, but the lack of being able to free roam on foot or in your ship is extremely limited. In a game that was advertised as a space explorer there is very little to explore. Also the amount of loading screens is absurd. Every time you walk through a door to a building you have a load screen, a lot of buildings also have load screens between rooms. I play on PC and have above average rig, so I was pretty upset with the poor performance as well. Indoors I can get 70-80 fps, but as soon as I go outside it’s a slideshow dropping down to 30 sometimes 20. Based entirely of of performance and QoL I cannot recommend this game.

    On to the story, I haven’t finished it yet but if feels uninspired compared to the faction side quests. I absolutely love doing the side quests. They really did do something great with them, it’s just unfortunate that they are better than the main story.    … Expand
  78. So8
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Bon, mon avis prend en compte le budget colossal de 200M d'euros alloué au projet, ainsi que les 7-8 ans de développement.

    Voici une liste des forces et faiblesses : Forces : - L'écriture, les dialogues, le scénario m'ont plus, les personnages sont crédibles et c'est ce qui m'a fait tenir. C'est clairement le haut du panier dans ce domaine et c'est un savoir-faire Bethesda typique,    Bon, mon avis prend en compte le budget colossal de 200M d'euros alloué au projet, ainsi que les 7-8 ans de développement.

    Voici une liste des forces et faiblesses :

    Forces :
    - L'écriture, les dialogues, le scénario m'ont plus, les personnages sont crédibles et c'est ce qui m'a fait tenir. C'est clairement le haut du panier dans ce domaine et c'est un savoir-faire Bethesda typique, avec notamment les excellents fallout 3 et NV.

    - L'ost, assez inégale mais généralement de bonne facture et excellente de temps en temps, elle m'a mis dans une bonne atmosphère.

    - Certains panoramas jolies et très agréables à contempler.

    - L'arbre de compétence c'est selon chacun et moi ce genre me plaît.

    Par contre, trop de points négatifs :

    - Depuis des années, la communication tourne autour du gigantisme, de l'espace incroyable, des fameuses 1000 planètes et j'en passe. Et là c'est la douche froide. Pas d'exploration spatiale, et en plus des temps de chargements. Je croyais que la XBX était censée révolutionner cela ? Toujours des paroles. Et ce n'est pas la seule entreprise à se foutre de nous, loin de là.

    - Donc pas d'exploration, à quoi bon passer du temps à personnaliser le vaisseau ? Et sur la planète, pourquoi ne pas avoir un véhicule ? C'est l'enfer de vouloir tout visiter à pieds ou en jet-pack.

    - Des temps de chargement pour entrer dans des bâtiments ? Bienvenue en 2010. De plus chaque temps de chargement dur environ 10 secondes à l'heure où les ssd nous habitue à mieux.

    - Les voix françaises inégales, et cette synchronisation labiale inexistante, c'est quoi encore ça ? De la fainéantise. J'ai dû le mettre en VO car je n'ai pas pu m'y faire ça devenait insupportable. Je rappelle : 200M de budget, le doublage français a été fait, la synchronisation labiale aurait Dû être une formalité.

    - Vu qu'à la sortie de la Xbox où nous vantait la console la plus puissante, pourquoi ne pas avoir le 60 fps ? Ça devrait être une base. Le 30 FPS rend les jeux saccadés quand on s'habitue au 60.
    Le 28fps oui, mais au cinéma. Pas en bej6, soyons sérieux.

    - 3 crashes en 40 heures.

    - Des bugs mais on est habitué avec ce studio.

    À l'heure où l'artistique se lisse de plus en plus (dans le jv, le cinéma, la musique...), il va falloir sérieusement se poser la question côté consommateur et publicitaires/influenceurs qui vendent ce jeu comme étant un chef d'œuvre, de revoir ses jugements. C'est en louant ce genre de jeu (rempli de choses qui, de façon objective, ne vont pas !) que l'industrie va encore plus se lisser et proposer le minimum.

    J'ai pas abordé le point de l'accessibilité mais c'est une honte aussi. Je vois de la flemme de la part du studio.
    Et là où va le JV me fait bien peur pour la suite. Avec des influenceurs vendus qui n'aideront pas.
    Soyez exigeants, car là c'est inquiétant.

    L'autre problème c'est la communication. Chaque AAA sont vendus comme des jeux qui vont tout révolutionner, et manette en mains, la douche froide. Le pognon est roi malheureusement.    … Expand
  79. xboxbrx
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Starfield é um grande jogo com oportunidades desperdiçadas pelo seu motor grafico pifio.

    bethesda fica mt na zona de conforto com essa porcaria de motor grafico. eu esperava um grande jogo com grandes possibilidades. que na verdade foi entregue um jogo mediano para ruim. com quase nda de "novo" e nem exploravel. que com 5 planetas visitados vc já ta exausto e só faz fast travels.    Starfield é um grande jogo com oportunidades desperdiçadas pelo seu motor grafico pifio.

    bethesda fica mt na zona de conforto com essa porcaria de motor grafico.
    eu esperava um grande jogo com grandes possibilidades.
    que na verdade foi entregue um jogo mediano para ruim.
    com quase nda de "novo" e nem exploravel. que com 5 planetas visitados vc já ta exausto e só faz fast travels.

    sem contar os loadings infinitos até para abrir porta.
    parece que o jogo ta rodando em um CD-ROM dos anos 90.
    uma vergonha uma coisa destas.
    dona bethesda bora mudar essa merda de motor ultrapassado e fazer os jogos brilharem aos olhos.
    rpg vcs sabem fazer, mas fazer a mesma coisa o tempo todo é foda.
    ta na hora de sair da zona de conforto.    … Expand
  80. Gvr11
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Jogo extremamente burocrático, cheio de menus e loading.
    As animações são terríveis e a IA é fraquinha.
    Gráficos de N64 sem muitos detalhes.
  81. Gabriel1991
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Tá devendo muito! As naves, os trajes e principalmente as armas estão perfeitas, a gameplay também é boa na parte da ação, porém a exploração espacial é pífia, não agrega em nada no jogo, prometeram demais e não entregaram, diálogos muitos chatos não tô aguentando mais, já tô apertando qualquer coisa. Estava ansioso pela exploração nos "1000 planetas" e me decepcionei.
  82. ReydEnd
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Starfield sera sin ninguna duda uno de los juegos mas jugados de esta decada, pero al dia de hoy le faltan muchos parches y contenido extra que haga la exploración planetaria mas entretenida y menos repetitiva.

    Amo los juegos de Bethesda, se que hice una buena compra porque a futuro sera un juegazo, pero por el momento lo dejare hasta que este parcheado o Bethesda al fin saque el Creation    Starfield sera sin ninguna duda uno de los juegos mas jugados de esta decada, pero al dia de hoy le faltan muchos parches y contenido extra que haga la exploración planetaria mas entretenida y menos repetitiva.

    Amo los juegos de Bethesda, se que hice una buena compra porque a futuro sera un juegazo, pero por el momento lo dejare hasta que este parcheado o Bethesda al fin saque el Creation Kit para que salgan mods de Mass Effect o Star Wars.

    Puedo decir con toda seguridad que a este juego le falto un año mas de desarrollo.    … Expand
  83. Enthoni95
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Starfield, despite being a giant, is a golden opportunity that was thrown in the trash by Microsoft.
    1000 Planets and practically nothing to do.
    Promises that sold the Space RPG that didn't deliver. They justify that the Void on the Planet serves to show that the Player is small, that when Man went to the moon and found nothing, it did not fail to fascinate him, so they thought that a huge    Starfield, despite being a giant, is a golden opportunity that was thrown in the trash by Microsoft.
    1000 Planets and practically nothing to do.
    Promises that sold the Space RPG that didn't deliver.
    They justify that the Void on the Planet serves to show that the Player is small, that when Man went to the moon and found nothing, it did not fail to fascinate him, so they thought that a huge RPG with nothing to do would fascinate them players too!    … Expand
  84. lubofer
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    It's a joke for a game in 2023 to run at 30 fps on the console. The game, overall, doesn't provide the freedom that was so highly anticipated by those who saw the trailers. Unfortunately, the game falls short in many aspects, and even graphically speaking, there's nothing particularly impressive. The feeling is that the game is a poorly executed blend of Skyrim and Fallout in an alphaIt's a joke for a game in 2023 to run at 30 fps on the console. The game, overall, doesn't provide the freedom that was so highly anticipated by those who saw the trailers. Unfortunately, the game falls short in many aspects, and even graphically speaking, there's nothing particularly impressive. The feeling is that the game is a poorly executed blend of Skyrim and Fallout in an alpha version! The only interesting aspects are the RPG elements and the main storyline. It's definitely not worth paying such a high price for this game.… Expand
  85. NickGoldThief
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Sold as a grand RPG experience spanning over a thousand planets, Starfield falls short of offering any sort of unique or distinguishable content over its peers and competitors, opting for the often critiqued approach of quantity over quality at a scale truly never seen before while forgoing the hallmarks Bethesda's best works despite replaying their previous shortcomings.

    Critically,    Sold as a grand RPG experience spanning over a thousand planets, Starfield falls short of offering any sort of unique or distinguishable content over its peers and competitors, opting for the often critiqued approach of quantity over quality at a scale truly never seen before while forgoing the hallmarks Bethesda's best works despite replaying their previous shortcomings.

    Critically, Quests and Exploration have been reduced to little more than fetch quests and checklists, all attempts at motivating you to experience the few dozens of procedurally generated dungeons, lifeforms, enemies and vistas on the many but very limited and conforming landscapes of Starfield, a symptom of the numerous compromises that the Bethesda formula had to go through to support its vast emptiness.    … Expand
  86. ScorpiusHK
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Unfortunately, it's a poorly executed game, bringing a dated and non-intuitive mechanics. However, the main downside is that it didn't deliver on its promise of free space exploration. Space travel is almost static, and you can't enter a planet's atmosphere or land anywhere. The planets are very similar, most of them having smooth surfaces without caves to explore or oceans and lakes. TheUnfortunately, it's a poorly executed game, bringing a dated and non-intuitive mechanics. However, the main downside is that it didn't deliver on its promise of free space exploration. Space travel is almost static, and you can't enter a planet's atmosphere or land anywhere. The planets are very similar, most of them having smooth surfaces without caves to explore or oceans and lakes. The absence of natural phenomena on the planets also discourages exploration.

    It has an abundance of items with no explanation of how they can be used, giving the impression that the developers designed the game for a fanbase accustomed to Bethesda games without considering a new audience. Navigation is clunky, not intuitive, and lacks the assistance of a map.

    The combat system is rudimentary and lacks variety, with insufficient ammunition or even the need for ammunition in a futuristic game being a limiting factor that prevents players from experiencing Starfield as they would like.

    Poorly polished and unimpressive NPCs with limited facial expressions make dialogues and the story monotonous. Not to mention the absence of cinematics. The textures of the locations are reminiscent of consoles from two generations ago. The ending is simplistic, lazy, and frustrating.

    Starfield is a game that failed to fully explore the capabilities of Microsoft's console, which is a serious issue coming from a studio owned by the same company. Since its release, owners of Series X and S are still waiting for something that feels like the new generation.    … Expand
  87. Xbox100goty
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Eu simplesmente achei uma oportunidade perdida pela Bethesda em criar algo novo e merecer de elogios...a Bethesda/Xbox precisa rever suas estratégias de desenvolvimento de games.… Expand
  88. Viperinesaint
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Injugable.¿Como le dicen Next gent a esto?Si fuera 2013 me lo creo pero estámos en 2023,no me puedo creer que Xbox haya puesto la mano en el asador por este juego, realmente decepcionado por Bethesda,mira que lo hizo bien con Fallout 4.Pero que esperar de Todd Pinocho.
  89. AndrewPichinini
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    It’s simply not a great game. The story is boring, and it’s just a repeat of every other Bethesda game ever made. The worst part is having loading screens every couple minutes just to get to a place that has no entertaining content. There are a few occasions where the landscapes line up, and it looks beautiful, but way more often than not it looks like a game made in 2015. The shipIt’s simply not a great game. The story is boring, and it’s just a repeat of every other Bethesda game ever made. The worst part is having loading screens every couple minutes just to get to a place that has no entertaining content. There are a few occasions where the landscapes line up, and it looks beautiful, but way more often than not it looks like a game made in 2015. The ship building is clunky, but it’s the only part of the game I’ve really enjoyed. The gun play is okay, but the NPCs are absolutely awful. Turning up the difficulty doesn’t help. It just makes you waste more time spraying bullets. The facial animations are not acceptable for 2023. Overall I’m hugely disappointed as I had high hopes.… Expand
  90. ROSVER
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Even though this game had a lot potential, and story content has been better for a bgs game. However, there is no classic open world feeling anymore in Starfield, which is sad.
  91. Umuruk
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    One of the most unfun things I've played in the last 10 years. Worst purchase I've made in 2023
  92. Otter89
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    Got a free premium code with a GPU purchase. So no monetary investment.

    As many many others have stated, the game soon loses its magic once you see the same POI for the 3rd time in a day, the main story lacks any wow factor at all. The loading screens soon grated on my patience after having to watch my ship boost into outer space rather than let me do it, Companions lack any    Got a free premium code with a GPU purchase. So no monetary investment.

    As many many others have stated, the game soon loses its magic once you see the same POI for the 3rd time in a day, the main story lacks any wow factor at all.
    The loading screens soon grated on my patience after having to watch my ship boost into outer space rather than let me do it,

    Companions lack any interesting qualities to make me bother taking them with me.
    The graphics look good for what we expect in 2023 but I have read reviewers speak gospel on these textures, and to be frank I have got the game cranked to the max and it's not breathtaking, It's just nice, the lip sync on dialogue can be spot on, or resemble a dubbed anime with the lips failing to match.

    Exploration, this is just a boring walk across a ProcGen planet outside of the main hub planets, once you've been to one, you've pretty much seen it all.

    Weapons and combat, this lacks any real "meat" to it, enemies are utterly braindead and will stand in the open letting you slot them over and over, when they're not glitching on boxes and loose terrain objects.

    Space Combat is a complete farce, not so much dogfighting as it is either instakilled by higher leveled AI ships or it's a slaughter once you unlock Class C ships.

    I frankly cannot recommend this game, even if you love Fallout or Skyrims offerings, because this offers nothing new.    … Expand
  93. Lilmaven
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    It's a decent game that's a horrible Bethesda game. I'm not sure where the full 8 years of development went.

    Pros - Main story and aesthetic
    Cons - LOADING SCREENS, general graphics, character models, character dialogue, ship building, ships combat, general combat, bland planets, boring exploration,
  94. mrmajor
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    The story is non-compelling, gameplay monotonous, menus and leveling are a step backwards, and the NPCs are lifeless. Excellent music as with most Bethesda games. I'll be shelving this one until the mod community improves it.
  95. Erik1986
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Juego hermoso jugabilidad de 10 no lloren niños de playstiercol vayan a jugar con su ****… Expand
  96. CharlieTheDummy
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    This game is wide as an ocean but deep as a puddle, outside few decent sidequests its basically once again a fallout 4 reskin, Looter shooter with barebones rpg elements.
    I wonder what developers been doing for so many years because this game dont look like it was in development for 7 years
    Game is once again held by awful Emil Pagliarulo writting, poor graphics,outdated engine and 0 new    This game is wide as an ocean but deep as a puddle, outside few decent sidequests its basically once again a fallout 4 reskin, Looter shooter with barebones rpg elements.
    I wonder what developers been doing for so many years because this game dont look like it was in development for 7 years
    Game is once again held by awful Emil Pagliarulo writting, poor graphics,outdated engine and 0 new ideas.
    Studios needs to evolve but bethesda has been in stagnation ever since Fallout 4 release
    Mid game gets mid score    … Expand
  97. Joovez
    Sep 7, 2023
    4
    It's not interesting to play starfield. I just couldn't stand more than 3 hours in this game. This is absolutely not interesting both from the point of view of the plot and from the point of view of gameplay. There is no space in this game. As well as the open world.
    Add here the promises that we were showered with during the presentation of this game and you will understand that we were    It's not interesting to play starfield. I just couldn't stand more than 3 hours in this game. This is absolutely not interesting both from the point of view of the plot and from the point of view of gameplay. There is no space in this game. As well as the open world.
    Add here the promises that we were showered with during the presentation of this game and you will understand that we were lied to, we were deceived.
    Bethesda has created a mod for Fallout 4. And the concept itself stretches back to the time of Morrowind.
    You should not buy this game at least because you do not want to support such a hack.
    The Bethesda company is parasitic on its previous achievements.    … Expand
  98. Sealow
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 50 hours+ in with the main quest completed twice and 2 faction quests fully completed. A very disappointing execution, very bad main story execution, tons of unnecessary travel waiting with no gameplay purpose, really bad world building, effectively 0 meaningful freedom in quests and storyline. Main story quest is effectively just 15 hours of doing the exact same thing over and over again. The worst part is that is that the locations are super generic and uninteresting locations. There is only one good quest in the entire main story quest line that features a research facility that is switching between dimensions. This quest is the only good quest in the game and it’s such a stark contrast against the extremely unambitious delivery for rest of the game.

    Travelling takes forever. I wish this was a fast travel simulator like it’s often mocked for being. The reality is that the travelling is painfully slow despite a 4090 and NVME2 maxed out PC. They add tons of painfully slow landing sequences. You can’t fast travel directly to the planets surface but you must instead travel to its orbit first. You must get scanned for contraband in almost all of the meaningful solar systems which also takes even more time. You also have to wait for you grav drive to power up for upwards of at least 6 seconds out of memory. The worst part is that it serves so little purpose, you almost never get attacked by other spaceships. While any meaningful orbit interactions / quests could’ve been much better executed by just having them appear in the solar system map view as a distress signal. 0 meaningful choice or interesting gameplay in quests. Compared against Cyberpunk the ability to approach a quest in multiple different ways is just non existent. No proper stealth, no different approaches to the objective and instead just a simple speech check at the very end of a quest to skip 10s of combat. Abysmal non existent world building instead of the cool and extensive world building we saw in Fallout 4. The days of exploring the wasteland and coming across tons of cool structures and settings are gone. You got a few small cities that are hard to traverse with not a lot of substance. If you ever hope to come across a cool building with tons of enemies anywhere you’re going to be disappointed. It’s going to be same looking space building facility you see everywhere else. With the same generic 4x4 meter building block set.

    7-8 years of development for this? 66% of the game is spent running in barren planet with 0 meaningful world building and tons of artificially added waiting screens. The rest of the 33% is generic combat with the most linear dialogue and quest options imaginable. To call this game too ambitious is not doing it service. This is a very unambiguous game with even worse delivery.

    As for bugs I encountered 2-3 bugs that soft locked the main quest as important characters would start to float up in the air, etc. in all cases I was able to reload the save and run up to the person I needed to talk to before they floated into the planets atmosphere. Not too bad on this front for a Bethesda game.

    As someone who is a massive fan of fallout new vegas and a big fan of Cyberpunk this was a massive disappointment. The game designs and direction is incredibly outdated and I have to be honest that for Bethesda to be one of only 2 game studios producing massive first person RPGs like this is leaving me sad. If you are new to the genre and not that big of a RPG fan then maybe 6/10 can be a fair rating. But if you are a massive fan of fallout new vegas, fallout 4, Cyberpunk and were hoping for a big leap forward. Then you’re in for the opposite, it’s a far worse experience than even fallout 4. The 4/10 is for the people that never wanted a looter shooter no man’s sky but an actual RPG with a good story and meaningful freedom.    … Expand
  99. overmorb
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Its awfulest mix of all gamedesign features you can imagine
    lifeless, boring, rather unoptimized even on high end pc
    Pure degradation - F4 and skyrim were better on so many levels on the date of release Only one thing in all freaking game is ok - boarding ships in space - thats it - and its not like wonderful - its JUST OK . And yeah - no rover or hovercraft or flying above the planet    Its awfulest mix of all gamedesign features you can imagine
    lifeless, boring, rather unoptimized even on high end pc
    Pure degradation - F4 and skyrim were better on so many levels on the date of release
    Only one thing in all freaking game is ok - boarding ships in space - thats it - and its not like wonderful - its JUST OK . And yeah - no rover or hovercraft or flying above the planet or normal transfering around location - just teleport if you want faster - Todd failed to make most important thing for exploring game. Imagine this - starcitiezen and andromeda are better games. NMS better game, comparing this
    graphics - 6.6(6)/10 - meh - nothing special
    shooting on foot mechanics/fights - 5/10 - space fus ro da. Very dumb ai
    spacemechanics flight dogfights 1/10
    Ui/HUD-2/10 - its awful
    music - 2/10 - its just misplaced its not for this game
    plot/narrative - 2/10 - It was all the dog's dream.
    exploring/inventory/trading 3/10
    ship constructor - 5/10 - the only thing mods can fix i guess
    gameworld/content/location/maps - 3/10    … Expand
  100. Alonsorossi
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Boring, linear, characters without charisma. It looks like a game from 2010.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best Xbox Series X Game of 2023
1
#1 Most Discussed Xbox Series X Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
83

Generally favorable reviews - based on 81 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 69 out of 81
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 81
  3. Negative: 1 out of 81
  1. Gamereactor Finland
    Nov 1, 2023
    70
    It's a big game, but starts way too slowly, and may never get interesting.
    Read full review
  2. Gamereactor Spain
    Oct 16, 2023
    90
    It is true that you'll find a good number of barren wastelands with little to do other than extracting some resources and take off to more interesting places, but again it really depends on how you want to play. There's so much to do, so many systems and abilities to explore, missions to complete, spaceships to loot, and species to catalogue, that I honestly don't think there's anybody who thinks that exploring every square meter of this universe is the better way to enjoy Starfield.
    Read full review
  3. The Loadout
    Oct 15, 2023
    80
    While it has weak spots and doesn’t push many boundaries, Starfield is still an excellent RPG experience. Bethesda has once again mastered the things it built its reputation on – world building, quest design, and deep customization. However, it’s found new things to excel at too, with exciting combat and a novel implementation of New Game Plus.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »