Battlefield V

 Xbox One
User Score
3.2

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 860 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 203 out of 860
  2. Mixed: 79 out of 860
  3. Negative: 578 out of 860
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. KasaethaN
    Jun 30, 2020
    6
    It's a fun game to play... for a while. Got tired, BF1 was much better and gave me pleasure for a very long time. A pity because I am a WWII fanatic and I was very hyped before the release.
  2. elenika210
    Sep 22, 2019
    5
    Every time multiplayer match teams are unbalanced, and there is too many walking areas in maps. Run run and death wait ten second and again run run... Bad maps because I don't understand where is the battle. Everyone kills each other from behind. And too many loading times.
  3. Artox
    Nov 23, 2018
    5
    Гораздо лучше Battlefield 1,но проблемы с серверами и соединением…это печально и портит впечатление от игры. 90% времени ты перезапускаешь игру ,консоль или роутер,так как зависает,не загружает и т.д. А геймплей,динамика,атмосфера прям на пятерку.
    Надеюсь поправят проблемы с соединением.    Гораздо лучше Battlefield 1,но проблемы с серверами и соединением…это печально и портит впечатление от игры. 90% времени ты перезапускаешь игру ,консоль или роутер,так как зависает,не загружает и т.д. А геймплей,динамика,атмосфера прям на пятерку.
    Надеюсь поправят проблемы с соединением.
  4. DJalphamist
    Nov 27, 2018
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. i feel bad for saying this because i love battlefield games but this needs to be addressed the game is not finished iv'e had a few bugs but pretty minor ones like not being able to change to the rifle bullet on the M30 drilling shotgun ....but now to the game the graphics are wonderful and they do show it off ironically desert map, snow map, forest map the story's i don't mind.
    its just how they blatantly changed it like the story with the heavy water it was a team of commandos i think and they didn't kill anyone on that mission ... so nice one to make us kill a load of germans on that mission when that didnt happen in real life but it was fun especially with the skis even though i stealth-ed it the whole way and went i'll use the skis on the way back and i used the skis every chance i got it was a brilliant mechanic and a fall that you would take fall damage you wont with skis i noticed so i was using them to jump off things ... and they did use them in WW2,
    the last war story i enjoyed and thats when the graphics stood out the only thing that made me go really was a bit when the guy said no spare the German soldiers life and in the next bit its horrendous what they do to them and it makes an impact ... just they used the same facial texture so the bodies you see of the black soldiers have the same clothes hat and even dirt.
    cant say anything about the forth story because its not out ... a story mission not out welcome to 2018 and only 4 story's ... you could have done way more especially for WW2 and the introduction ... it was done better in battlefield 1 and anyway onto the multiplayer ... so far I've enjoyed it except for people who don't revive and are using medic for the weapons (may happen quite a bit) the weapons are smooth and unique the game modes not all of them are out ..,. of course in 2018.
    the game mode operations has changed from battlefield 1 to do a bit of everything i think they said the game mode will get longer as the new game modes come out ... so my problems with the game is some weapons clearly not having a advantage and never standing a chance real events being changed for a narrative when the original story is a much better narrative
    (if you wanted a story with a women a guarantee theirs a few in WW2 cause some did fight but most of them were medics still sounds like a great story to me) i know some events of WW2 yes we all know it was a terrible thing literally for the world but the reason i dont like old based shooting games are literally the weapons ... but i'm not judging it because of that and since i'm still on about weapons ... what have you done customising your weapon does not mean i'm gonna make it pink i get it WW2 not many things to put on but even the ..progression? of the weapons there all good upgrades like no downside to the weapon at all it's silly
    the vehicles ... i cant judge honestly i havent used them and i usually avoid them it is enjoyable game overall it just can get a bit annoying depending on the team at one point we had to take the bombs to five seprate locations on the last one my team was running down a alleyway getting mowed down and i was the only one going round them ....
    and i have to talk about the controversy before this game came out ... i get women helped in WW2 but not usually on the front lines ... i should say never on the front lines unless you want to count Russia .... ok i'm getting off topic people wanted a historically accurate battlefield and they ended up putting women in samurai swords on British soldiers prosthetic limbs it was going really overboard
    and when they came out with either buy it or don't ... good for them no begging and such ... even though one guy said on the team i don't want to have to say to my daughter she cant play as a girl .... first how old is she to be asking that about a WW2 game and playing a 18 rated game? anyway i'll stop here it is fun the graphics are good maybe they should of finished the game before releasing it    … Expand
  5. dape
    Nov 15, 2018
    5
    Pros:
    - Graphics are quite good (although nothing exciting these days)
    - Animations are solid - Shooting mechanics are solid Cons: - Terrible visibility in every aspect of a game: you don't see enemy in front of a wall, you can't pick enemy in tons of garbage, it's hard to read deploy map to see what's going on, kill feed is disabled by default taking away crucial information - UX    Pros:
    - Graphics are quite good (although nothing exciting these days)
    - Animations are solid
    - Shooting mechanics are solid

    Cons:
    - Terrible visibility in every aspect of a game: you don't see enemy in front of a wall, you can't pick enemy in tons of garbage, it's hard to read deploy map to see what's going on, kill feed is disabled by default taking away crucial information
    - UX is something DICE never heard of. Menus are not intuitive and take long to navigate. Configuring every class for both sides is a choir - battlelog was a lot better than this.
    - Bugs, bugs, bugs, bugs - I've had one team on server suddenly not be able to revive, flying tanks, objects hovering in the air, unkillable enemies, flickering textures
    - Maps are bad. And I mean really bad - they are beautiful but hardly playable - a lot of clutter with a lot of open spaces. Again: VISIBILITY is sacrificed for a fancy visuals. It's bad for multiplayer game. Look at: CS GO, Overwatch, Fortnite - those games have extremely good visibility and that makes them so good. In BF: V for most of the time you are wondering if it's some fancy map decoration or proned camper from other team.
    - "How did I die this time?" - Is a question you will be asking yourself a lot. Game gives no information what is going on, who made damage to you, where was he when it happened. Compared to COD killcam it's a joke (because it's nonexistent) and done probably to hide bad netcode (later on that) and growing problems with hackers (whoever plays bf1 knows what i'm talking about). You will die many times mostly not knowing how - just get used to it.
    - Informational chaos - game hides important information from you (hidden kill-feed, no info on how you got killed) but feeds a lot of totally not necessary information (something about your squad leader being changed, something about progression in achievement, something about community event will find its way to your display)
    - Lack of content - Maps that are here are not only bad but also scarce. I guess EA clearly goes for a long term Origin Premium model and wants to spoon-feed content so people stay interested and pay for subscription for as long as possible. There are not that many guns in game and there is no deep customization for them anymore.
    - Inconsistent netcode - Again you die in a milisecond. Again you can try to hit enemy that is further than high refresh bubble and nothing will happen. Guess that just comes with inventory.    … Expand
  6. eva3si0n
    Nov 15, 2018
    5
    Battlefield V could become a failure and the worst game of 2018. The announcement of a game caused in me rage and hatred. I against feminists and sexual minorities. I understand that in Europe and the USA the tolerance occupied society. But you make a game about the 2nd world war. War, the cause for which the Nazism was. War in which the whole people battled for the fact of existence. AndBattlefield V could become a failure and the worst game of 2018. The announcement of a game caused in me rage and hatred. I against feminists and sexual minorities. I understand that in Europe and the USA the tolerance occupied society. But you make a game about the 2nd world war. War, the cause for which the Nazism was. War in which the whole people battled for the fact of existence. And add women with iron implants instead of hands to a setting of this era?
    Game was postponed to 1 month. If EA did not act this way, then I would even not know who bought BF5 against the background of COD Black Ops 4 and Red Dead Redemption 2. Same suicide!
    As for the game - it is empty. In it there is no content. Everything that has to be in release is absent. Developers just speak "then". OK, I then will buy it "then". Why to release it? How it is so possible to arrive in general after Battlefield 1?
    The single mode in general became boring, even in BF1 it was more interesting. Better it was not in a game at all. Military of history BF5 look worse even COD WW2 plot cliche.
    And we receive that, an empty game without content, without normal (even by the standards of the Battlefield series) the single mode, without optimization. Yes graphics on Xbox One X is fine and the gameplay is excellent. At last that a series returns to canons, but is not guided by the COD series. But it does not cost $60. This game needs to be completed at least a year more. And for an otstutstviye of other fractions minus. The lack of the USA and the USSR in a game about World War II looks ridiculous. Possibly it was left on "then" too.
    In 10 hours of a game on a subscription of EA Access it is possible to receive upon all content of a game. About what release for $60 can there be a speech?    … Expand
  7. BigSandwich
    Dec 18, 2018
    7
    Definitly has the potential to be one of the best battlefield games, but still needs some work. Don't listen to all the reviews about the women and Dice and EA's terrible marketing, it was terrible but that isn't going to affect the game. Defeinitly needs work but I can see this as being one of my favorite Battlefield games, although nothing will ever beat bf3 and 4, thats just a fact.
  8. MonkiReviews
    Jan 17, 2019
    7
    This game is very fun, at least the multiplayer is. The story part isn’t very entertaining, playing as different characters is fun, but the story is plain and not very fun to play. The multiplayer is great though. Playing online with a bunch of other people in one game, trying to win and eliminate opens is fun in this game. Each map is big, but not too big, and can be really fun. IThis game is very fun, at least the multiplayer is. The story part isn’t very entertaining, playing as different characters is fun, but the story is plain and not very fun to play. The multiplayer is great though. Playing online with a bunch of other people in one game, trying to win and eliminate opens is fun in this game. Each map is big, but not too big, and can be really fun. I recommend this game, the story isn’t great (it’s not super bad though), and the multiplayer is awesome.… Expand
  9. schmitty723
    Dec 4, 2018
    6
    Aside from the political crap, they ruined flying and spotting, maps don't flow as well as BF1. Looks like theyre going to make some improvements though. I didn't really want the lesser known battles, give me freaking normandy on a modern battlefield game i mean seriously, looking forward to maps coming down the road, looks like theyre trying to make game improvements, taking feedbackAside from the political crap, they ruined flying and spotting, maps don't flow as well as BF1. Looks like theyre going to make some improvements though. I didn't really want the lesser known battles, give me freaking normandy on a modern battlefield game i mean seriously, looking forward to maps coming down the road, looks like theyre trying to make game improvements, taking feedback seriously. Happy they didnt EA the crap out of it with DLCs like in the past.… Expand
  10. DeadlyFreedom
    Jan 7, 2019
    7
    Okay so, let me preface this by saying that I thoroughly enjoyed BF1. Sank many, many hours into the multiplayer and got my money's worth. I have hated COD ever since Ghosts and never got on Overwatch. I needed a good multiplayer FPS to scratch that itch.

    With all the PC SJW crap that was inserted into this game and the fact that EA called us stupid if we don't understand it, i didn't    Okay so, let me preface this by saying that I thoroughly enjoyed BF1. Sank many, many hours into the multiplayer and got my money's worth. I have hated COD ever since Ghosts and never got on Overwatch. I needed a good multiplayer FPS to scratch that itch.

    With all the PC SJW crap that was inserted into this game and the fact that EA called us stupid if we don't understand it, i didn't want to give them a dime for this. I was talked into it and pulled the trigger (only paid $8 for it so whatever). After about 20 hours on multiplayer and a few on the war stories, i have to say that it is not bad. The war stories are not very believable, but they are okay to play.

    The multiplayer is not without flaws but I have been having fun with it. I liked the maps in BF1 a LOT better. There are only 9 and most of the time you only get dropped into 5 or 6. I think there are still a few I haven't played, but i tend to stick to Domination so that may be a factor. Gun balancing and team balancing is atrocious and is my biggest complaint. Every shotgun in the game with the exception of 1 is basically a children's toy. Even at almost point blank range it takes two shots to drop anyone. I am sure balance updates will come but this should be obvious. I also cannot believe that they released the game in November, yet will not drop their battle royale mode until March. That is INSANE.

    All that said, I went in with very low expectations and I have been pleasantly surprised. It has its flaws but at the end of the day, I am fine with it being my multiplayer FPS for the time being. The choices are limited out there and this one works for me. It is scratching that itch and that is all I wanted.

    Can they step it up and make a better game? Probably. But this is EA we are talking about. They hate gamers and only see us as cash cows. Is it as bad a Fallout 76 though? No. If you enjoyed BF1, you will probably like this. If not, pass it up. That simple.    … Expand
  11. Kalashnikovich
    Mar 21, 2019
    7
    Forget the politics, after the backlash i think they scaled down the SJW stuff, sure theres still women, but they all got shaved heads and the body animations all look the same so honestly you can barely tell. They didnt put in any goofy hook arms or anything, so Im not really complaining about that. The gunplay feels great, like that a lot. This game overall i think is a lot of fun and IForget the politics, after the backlash i think they scaled down the SJW stuff, sure theres still women, but they all got shaved heads and the body animations all look the same so honestly you can barely tell. They didnt put in any goofy hook arms or anything, so Im not really complaining about that. The gunplay feels great, like that a lot. This game overall i think is a lot of fun and I have more fun with it than i did with BF1. I think the core gameplay mechanics are fantastic and it could be a great battlefield on par with or better than BF4, where they really screwed up a bit is in the maps and locations, this whole "unknown and unplayed battles" is not a good idea, i think everyone wanted Wake Island and D Day and stuff. Also I would like to see more large maps like Hamda comes closest to a classic Battlefield feel, other maps just feel a bit too small and not epic enough. I think they did a good job balancing the infantry and vehicles in this one, vehicle players may not like it as much but games like BF4 just felt like whoever had a vehicle would dominate automatically and infantry felt under powered, here it feels just right. All the classes feel good and balanced. Overall its great and fun but i think it needs some more large and iconic maps, we need boats and water transport, some more spread out maps, etc.. id say i give it a 7.5 right now, with more content it could be an 8 or 9.… Expand
  12. joeee357
    May 12, 2019
    6
    A good addition to the battlefield entry, with the changes taking it in a direction different enough to not feel the same as past entries but not too much that it doesnt feel like battlefield anymore. Though the moment to moment gameplay is generally smooth in my experience with few bugs i have encountered a few that prevented me from playing, sometimes requiring a restart. These have beenA good addition to the battlefield entry, with the changes taking it in a direction different enough to not feel the same as past entries but not too much that it doesnt feel like battlefield anymore. Though the moment to moment gameplay is generally smooth in my experience with few bugs i have encountered a few that prevented me from playing, sometimes requiring a restart. These have been infrequent enough to not take away from my enjoyment overall, with only 2 instances after 60 hours. The political element was never so invasive that it broke immersion for me, and shouldnt put off anyone whos interested in playing a videogame. Definitely worth the £20 i payed but probably wouldve been dissatisfied at full price.… Expand
  13. Misaghjrh
    Jun 19, 2019
    7
    In this review, only the negative aspects of the game are considered. The purpose of this work is to help you to get a better decision on the purchase of the game

    My Rating: 7 of 10

    Weak points (Single player only):
    - No progress and no difference with regard to the previous version
    - The game is short
    - Major glitches (seen publicly in all EA games)
  14. MrKian25
    Jun 27, 2019
    7
    Insanely fun WWII game with good single player, multiplayer, and battle royale.
  15. frederik1478
    Feb 11, 2021
    7
    This is the best World War II campaign i have played, I haven't touched the multiplayer Because I was only really interested in the campaign , What are the best things about this game is that you see places in the second world war that you don't see anywhere else in gaming , And a way that the story makes you feel about the characters them and make you emotions are just amazing , TheThis is the best World War II campaign i have played, I haven't touched the multiplayer Because I was only really interested in the campaign , What are the best things about this game is that you see places in the second world war that you don't see anywhere else in gaming , And a way that the story makes you feel about the characters them and make you emotions are just amazing , The gameplay is also good if you reminded me of Far Cry I completed the game on hard and enjoyed it very much , It would recommended if you want a different kind of World War II Shooting .. ps, The German campaign was amazing… Expand
  16. Alex_Pilgrim008
    Nov 20, 2021
    7
    This is basically Battlefield 1.5. Thankfully, its improved since launch and the DLC is free. Multiplayer is fun as usual, especially if you have friends to play with. But the presentation, graphics and modes are the same as they were in BF 1. Additionally, the single player campaign is still inessential. While it might be very uninspired, the game is still fun. Overall, I would rate thisThis is basically Battlefield 1.5. Thankfully, its improved since launch and the DLC is free. Multiplayer is fun as usual, especially if you have friends to play with. But the presentation, graphics and modes are the same as they were in BF 1. Additionally, the single player campaign is still inessential. While it might be very uninspired, the game is still fun. Overall, I would rate this with a 7.7 out of 10.… Expand
  17. MRBeanJoga
    Jan 14, 2022
    6
    Even with a terrible launch the game actually managed to get in a much better state, sadly EA ditched this game live service to make BF2042, which is disappointing considering how well this game was doing when they released all of the updates.
  18. imBottle
    Sep 13, 2019
    5
    Solo Play/ Campaign:

    For players Looking for a Single Player experience: Battlefield V offers a collection of 5 original short stories labeled “War stories.” When combined, the solo experience takes roughly 5hrs to complete. While Each mission has a unique storyline and setting, the same can’t be said about the gameplay. Unfortunately, for most of the 5hrs you’ll be doing the same task in    Solo Play/ Campaign:

    For players Looking for a Single Player experience: Battlefield V offers a collection of 5 original short stories labeled “War stories.” When combined, the solo experience takes roughly 5hrs to complete. While Each mission has a unique storyline and setting, the same can’t be said about the gameplay. Unfortunately, for most of the 5hrs you’ll be doing the same task in each War Story. This will include: taking out checkpoints, capturing zones, and the occasional stealth mission. While the campaign started off strong, I started to feel the fatigue halfway through the already short experience. Multiplayer has remained untouched from previous battlefield games (Especially compared to Battlefield 1).The classic 64player modes including: Conquest, Operations, and team DeathMatch are still fun with a group of friends. However, the addition of Battlefield’s battle royale mode “FireStorm” feels lazy and out of place compared to other battle Royales on the market. With 5hr campaign and a mostly rehashed multiplayer from previous years. I can only recommend Battlefield V to fans of the franchise or owners of EA Access/ Origin. For others, Picking it up on a deep sale is recommended. 5/10- Average Game.    … Expand
  19. BradMorgan
    Aug 17, 2021
    6
    Battlefield V is the weakest version of the franchise. While it impresses in the audiovisual field, it falls short in the overall experience. The singleplayer is short but interesting due to the war stories that takes you to different settings during the second world war in a bombastic ways. Some are more impressive than the other, but all in all it was a nice experience. The multiplayerBattlefield V is the weakest version of the franchise. While it impresses in the audiovisual field, it falls short in the overall experience. The singleplayer is short but interesting due to the war stories that takes you to different settings during the second world war in a bombastic ways. Some are more impressive than the other, but all in all it was a nice experience. The multiplayer is very disappointing. Long loading times, Textures that sometimes don't load in at all and modes that just are not fun. This is of course personal. Ultimately, the game offers too little to really call it a full-fledged shooter.

    Pros:
    + Very impressive on the audiovisual part
    + Interesting war stories

    Cons:
    + Just 5 war stories
    + Not enough check points in the war stories
    + Multiplayer is disappointing    … Expand
  20. Reinbou23
    Sep 7, 2020
    7
    Short Campaing but isn´t that important for this Game in Specific. The Multiplayer is Good but Now i Can Say that it isn´t because of EA and DICE accorded to stop Updating the Game and canceling any future content with only 1 and a half Year of being released
  21. vaulttec
    Nov 22, 2020
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Battlefield V 2020 Review.
    Is Battlefield V better?Yes.
    Is it better than Battlefield 1?No.
    EA Dice thankfully did not gave up on this one. It was released in an unfinished state, and they began then to actively update Battlefield V.
    The Last Tiger story is really good and it would be better if it was there at release.
    The whole controversy with the Women is still there and apparently DICE didn't gave a crap about this.
    The Multiplayer core gameplay is still really fun with friends and when you cooperate with others. But many modes, like the Grand Operations are worse than they were in Battlefield 1. Why? I don't know. Even the Gameplay itself in total feels somehow lifeless, but these core Battlefield Gameplay and Cooperation is still there and is fun.This game got better, but it is a shame that EA DICE stopped supporting the game, because after its first updates Battlefield V is really a lot better. The rewriting of the Feminism History is highly controversial and the awful reveal trailer and its unfinished state at launch were elements why this game was a flop.
    In Overall, Battlefield V went up from a 3/10 for me to a 5/10.
    The Stories are really disrespectful towards all the Veterans, how do a mum and her daughter blow up a whole Nazi Facility? The whole woman controversy...ugh. The Multiplayer feels lifeless, but the core Battlefield Gameplay is there. Id say, umm, get this game for like 15 Dollars at max and this only if your friends have it, because the single player war stories are really unrealistic and controversial...
    I hope that DICE learned from their mistakes here and EA too and that Battlefield 2021 will be better than this and eventually as good as Battlefield 1.    … Expand
  22. adam_carl
    Aug 30, 2021
    6
    It’s a good WORLD WAR II strory with awful gameplay and lame missions this is like the 0,02% of the history of the great battles so I was very wrong when I buyed this game so if you’re a fan of battlefield franchise don’t buy this lame **** buy the more like the BATTLEFIELD 3 or 4!!
  23. midgetgoat
    Oct 15, 2020
    7
    Ngl I really don't like the base game much at all. I only pick maps with planes and tanks for base game. But once war in the pacific came out it was a huge boost for me I couldn't get enough of how much better it is. Music in the "war in the pacific" is some of the best I've ever heard and the feeling overall is much better. The only problem I have with the pacific is how op planes are.Ngl I really don't like the base game much at all. I only pick maps with planes and tanks for base game. But once war in the pacific came out it was a huge boost for me I couldn't get enough of how much better it is. Music in the "war in the pacific" is some of the best I've ever heard and the feeling overall is much better. The only problem I have with the pacific is how op planes are. 1/10 for base game 9/10 for pacific… Expand
  24. AltairMorhen
    Jan 19, 2021
    5
    I think the principle problem with this Battlefield is the failed tentative to make a game which make a interconnection between all the histories of war in different cultures and countries, and failed badly. The system of shooting many times is boring, making the game boring as well. Anyway, a poor game.
  25. Vittle
    Feb 23, 2022
    6
    Meh game. Its just meh.
    The movement is greate and you can have alot of fun but Battlefield 1 and Battlefield 4 is way better.
    The last tiger is very good but the Norway one is the most disrespectful thing ever.
  26. StrangeSlayer
    May 2, 2021
    7
    jugue el juego con muy bajas espectativas,quizas eso fue lo que hiso que me sorprenda,en si el juego tiene unas fisicas y graficos peores que el BF1,pero en general es un buen juego,apesar de muchas fallas historicas,tiene una narrativa decente
  27. CondeDarkII
    Jun 9, 2021
    6
    I really loved the video game, but after the revelation of the new game, this meant that Battlefield V would be completely absent, and well, it was a bad start, but what they need is to add more content. They did not even add important battles, such as the battle of Berlin, the battle of Kursk, that of Stalingrad, in addition to those of the Pacific, such as more than Guadalcanal, Okinawa,I really loved the video game, but after the revelation of the new game, this meant that Battlefield V would be completely absent, and well, it was a bad start, but what they need is to add more content. They did not even add important battles, such as the battle of Berlin, the battle of Kursk, that of Stalingrad, in addition to those of the Pacific, such as more than Guadalcanal, Okinawa, Luzon, and others, such as the battle of El Alamein. That is serious; Well, if you focus on another game, this understands EA's lack of value to its games. But hey, it's the villain, they were expected.… Expand
  28. goodgriff33
    Apr 17, 2023
    7
    Answer: 75 characters is between 10 words and 19 words with spaces included in the character count. If spaces are not included in the character count, then 75 characters is between 12 words and 25 words.

Awards & Rankings

58
#58 Best Xbox One Game of 2018
8
#8 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2018
30
#30 Most Shared Xbox One Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 38 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 30 out of 38
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 38
  3. Negative: 0 out of 38
  1. XboxAddict
    Dec 13, 2018
    76
    It’s unfinished, but I’m highly optimistic that it will improve as new content releases and its Battlefield multiplayer at its finest, and that alone may sell the game for the longtime veteran considering what’s to come. I very reluctantly recommend Battlefield V in its current state, but I must stress my disappointment that EA and DICE willing released a game that feels kind of unfinished.
    Read full review
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 6, 2018
    70
    What's here is enough to be going on with, but we'll have to wait till next year's updates and in particular, that possibly seismic battle-royale mode, to discover whether this is truly a Battlefield that stands apart. [Jan 2019, p.114]
  3. TheXboxHub
    Nov 29, 2018
    70
    If you’re a fan of Battlefield then there is every reason to jump in with this year’s title, but if you want to experience the game as the developers have obviously intended, I suggest you hold off, enjoy the other amazing games released this year and come back to Battlefield V in about six months’ time when it’s no longer in its current state of being a glorified beta with a triple-A price tag.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »