Battlefield 1

 Xbox One
User Score
7.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 813 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 588 out of 813
  2. Mixed: 96 out of 813
  3. Negative: 129 out of 813
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Methatswho7520
    Mar 24, 2017
    6
    Trust me i don't write reviews unless i absolutely feel the need to and this is one of them times!

    I've had this game for a while and I loved the single player campaign, I went online after having the game for months just sitting there. Now I know why I haven't played that mode much...its extremely frustrating! if you are not into sniping don't play this game! you will not get as many    Trust me i don't write reviews unless i absolutely feel the need to and this is one of them times!

    I've had this game for a while and I loved the single player campaign, I went online after having the game for months just sitting there. Now I know why I haven't played that mode much...its extremely frustrating! if you are not into sniping don't play this game! you will not get as many kills as these vets on here, and I don't care how long you try and play to get better you will continue to feel frustrated....
    for 1.. I do love the map sizes and everything but they made it so you cant see an enemy standing right in front of you; basically bcus the enemy matches the landscape and everybody and their mother wants to snipe...me being an avid COD player I'm kinda use to run and gun w/ a lil sniping from time 2 time .. this game forces you to duck and hide especially if your a noob

    2.. being that everyone is sniping from FARRRRR distances youre going to die countless times from ppl that you never seen, thats not really fun, and then sometimes it feels like I'm shooting and shooting and shooting getting hits only for the person be able to turn right around and kill me with one or two shots! VERY FRUSTRATING!

    One time i was tracking this guy with my COD skills got him in a corner, ran up on him and knifed him BUT bcus he was ducking in the corner I missed him and he shot me and I died! smh I found that disgustingly bad! I don't care how much of a noob I am, THAT WAS A KILL! I mean I do play fps games

    Its just too many times where I felt over matched or as if I couldn't hit the side of a barnyard with any gun I had for the match.. Run right up on a dude thats not looking I still have to stop and aim bcus I cant get a clear shot, and in those valuable seconds doing that I usually get sniped by someone that seen me from wayyyyyyyyy across the map... I'm trying to like this game but multiplayer is making it hard 2 enjoy some kills, its forcing me to go back and play COD (AW) while I love the realism of this game, and thats what keeps me coming back... I hate jetpacks and stuff so thats what drew me back to this game after playing the campaign, but I think I'm ready to go back to my jetpacks now    … Expand
  2. StolenMadWolf
    Jan 19, 2017
    5
    Battlefield 1... it's a game with a lot of hype behind it, especially with the leap to a WW1 setting in the game. So naturally, I had high expectations.

    Come release, and the game is fun and looks absolutely amazing. The graphics are amongst the best I've ever seen, the sound tracks and the sound effects are fantastic, the general amount of balls DICE had to make the game and most    Battlefield 1... it's a game with a lot of hype behind it, especially with the leap to a WW1 setting in the game. So naturally, I had high expectations.

    Come release, and the game is fun and looks absolutely amazing. The graphics are amongst the best I've ever seen, the sound tracks and the sound effects are fantastic, the general amount of balls DICE had to make the game and most importantly, the legacy this game leaves behind.

    However, whilst the actual gameplay is decent enough... I have to admit I'm disappointed.

    The rest of the game is actually pretty mediocre, and frankly, I find BF3 and even BF4 superior.

    The gameplay feels clunky and the guns feel pretty damn horrible, sure, it's WW1 but you could have done a better job there. There is nothing new added to the table, even the new Operations mode, at it's basic core, is basically conquest applied to a rush map which happens to take place over multiple maps.

    The customisation, is frankly for a Battlefield game, pathetic. There are so few weapons for each class, you may say otherwise with the bigger lists, but nope, that's because you have THREE OF THE SAME WEAPON. It just happens they are patterns of weapons with certain attachments. This effectively kills any degree of customisation, the only worthwhile thing to adjust is the zoom of your sights/scopes. Everything else in terms of weapon's customisation is frankly unnecessary. The inconsistent Warbond system, AKA, the Battlefield version of Reach's credits and Titanfall 2's merits systems, sucks balls, further making things worse.

    The long level up times, lack of customisation and rewards and long winded warbounds mean there is a major feeling of no to little progression at all, making me feel like I've already seen the entire game compared to BF3, which lasted far, far longer.

    The vehicle customisation is just idiotic, having to select the vehicle spawn and press a button IN THE MIDDLE OF A MATCH just to customise it is idiotic.

    Speaking of vehicles, no one ever uses the Landship (Mark V tank), the FT-17 is hardly used, and everyone just uses the damn A7V. Probably because everyone wants to just use the big gun AND drive the tank at the same time. It's a shame because I love driving the Landship only to find players that are too impatient to stay in the sponson guns and no one actually just gets in. Vehicle gameplay is just bad.

    The new Behemoth units can be powerful, but only with reliable teammates, otherwise they die in a matter of seconds to AA guns in the case of the airship, annoying Torpedo Boats (only used for that purpose and getting your backside to the otherside of the map) in the case of the Dreadnaught, and most tragically, the Armored Train dies to everyone using their favourite pieces of equipment! AT Grenades and AT Rocket Guns!

    The War Stories, the new campaign mini stories, whilst a nice idea, are actually underwhelming, with needless stealth sections in places and poor stories. With only the compulsory and the first one being any good.

    What's tragic is that you will probably have to pay for DLC to make the game more interesting and better, which sucks a lot.

    Putting the bad aside, the best thing about the game is the legacy it will have, revitalising interest in WW1, especially as it starts moving out of living memory into the pages of history.

    So, the game's graphics, sound design, the developers coconut balls and the legacy this game has is beyond flawless, and deserves 11 out of 10. However, the rest of the game is a mess. The gameplay feels sloppy, the War Stories are underwhelming, the vehicles are bad, their is a lack of innovation, a TERRIBLE LACK OF CUSTOMISATION AND PROGRESSION, and some frankly stupid design decisions put into the game. The result is a game which comes as a major disappointment. I can judge a game surely on good looks alone when it's actually a bit of a pain in the backside.

    In fact, it annoys me when people say it's one of the best games ever, that couldn't be further from the truth. In fact, all the praise the game gets? BF1 doesn't deserve ANYWHERE NEAR the amount of praise it's getting now.

    Hence, I have to give it an average rating of 5/10. It's alright, but it's got some bad issues in the design and it's disappointing.    … Expand
  3. SmogAhab
    Dec 3, 2016
    7
    overhyped as hell! THE GOOD:the single player was a big improvement over every bf game and I like the characters and the setting was a breath of fresh air the graphic sound are amazing and the game feels good, THE BAD: the single player was short as hell maybe 5 hours long and easy as hell and I was playing on the hardest difficulty while I did like the character you don't spend enoughoverhyped as hell! THE GOOD:the single player was a big improvement over every bf game and I like the characters and the setting was a breath of fresh air the graphic sound are amazing and the game feels good, THE BAD: the single player was short as hell maybe 5 hours long and easy as hell and I was playing on the hardest difficulty while I did like the character you don't spend enough time with each the single player should have been at least 10 hrs long and focused on 1 or 2 parts of the war lawence of Arabia my personal fav and the dogfighting one the Italy and the runner ones sucked but the rest were good but repetitive and short the game doesn't use its setting at all this is the fastest and most cod like bf has ever been the time to kill is instant everyone is running around with smg and assault rifles and the snipers can get one shot body shots and the tanks are extremely op and their is no customization not even for your character in multiplayer and your character moves insanely fast but the multiplayer is still the best of the year which isn't saying much. the biggest thing that pisses me off is how people are saying "finally not another modern military shooter" cod hasn't been modern since mw3 and this is just bf4 with a ww1 paint job there is just as many automatic guns in this game as bf4 and they found the ww1 version of almost every gadget from bf4.… Expand
  4. Clarke
    Oct 18, 2016
    7
    I really don't know what to say you know I almost feel bad saying it wasn't enjoyable. I mean I like the game, the graphics are great, the campaigns great but, eh. The fun was very very short lived. I don't know if it was just my fun that was short lived and how it plateaued and then kinda declined.

    Sorry but not sorry because in my opinion the hype was way too much.
  5. captainkane
    Nov 3, 2016
    7
    Battlefield 1 is good. It will be THE shooter to beat this year. Why? Developer Dice realized it needed to push shooters forward, and that meant taking a few steps back. Setting BF1 in World War 1 allowed DICE to strain all the fat from the now bloated Battlefield series. EA is obsessed with pushing out a “killer app” to counter COD’s success, and developer Dice was nearly another casualtyBattlefield 1 is good. It will be THE shooter to beat this year. Why? Developer Dice realized it needed to push shooters forward, and that meant taking a few steps back. Setting BF1 in World War 1 allowed DICE to strain all the fat from the now bloated Battlefield series. EA is obsessed with pushing out a “killer app” to counter COD’s success, and developer Dice was nearly another casualty of that fruitless obsession. Remember when EA pushed Crysis 3 as the killer app? But with COD in decline, why bother? Dice knows gamers are fatigued by the futuristic trash out today. With every game cloning each other, someone had to offer something different. So why not visit the past? And with BF1’s success, I’m sure COD will push out another world war title of its own soon enough.

    BF1 is far from perfect. But let’s start with the positives. Foremost, BF1 looks and sounds spectacular. It’s a tremendous step up from BF4, which I think is overrated in most regards. Not surprisingly, BF1 looks similar to its Battlefront cousin. Character models were lifted directly from Battlefront, so at times I feel like I’m on the Endor moon gunning down Stormtroopers. That said, animations are less cartoony than previous Battlefields. The environments are amazing. Not only do the maps look great, they play great too. They feel inspired by Battlefield 2 and 3. Those maps emphasized cover, choke points, and infantry combat. Although vehicles are important in BF1, their roles are now supportive. Tanks are a real pain to take down, but they’re slow and easy to out flank. Thank the gaming gods I don’t have to worry about 4-wheelers covered in C4 anymore.

    Gunplay is solid. Many WWI period weapons were heavy with low recoil. So semi auto and automatic rifles are pretty darn effective. Moderate damage is offset by superb accuracy and range. Sniper rifles are more effective as well because of increased bullet velocity. Now, even casual players can snipe without investing a 40+ hours to learn bullet drop etc. Some players are already complaining about the easiness of sniping. They’re crybabies. Unlike BF3 and 4, snipers are easy to hunt down. They can’t parachute on top of radio towers or skyscrapers. Because sniping is more effective, I see more players becoming scouts to take on other snipers. The only players complaining about sniping in BF1 are those who don’t understand map control.

    Weapon variety is sparse. This is only disappointing because so many weapons existed during WW1. However, weapon balance is a problem in every shooter and too many weapons create headaches. Class customization has been simplified for the same reasons. As a result, class roles are straightforward. Too bad players don’t understand that.

    Most importantly, BF1 performs surprisingly well (comparatively). Hit detection is excellent due to increased server tickrates and better optimization. Dice dumped the clunky battlelog menu for something more streamlined and user friendly.

    So what’s wrong with it? BF1 is incomplete. Certain game modes-like hardcore-are missing with no indication when they’ll be up and running. Viewing stats is aggravatingly slow. Postgame states aren’t saved locally, so they have to be loaded each time viewed. I’m forced to wait 5-10 seconds just to review squad performance after a round, then another 5-10 to review my individual scores. The chat screen is buggy as heck.

    Matches randomly freeze for 1-2 seconds. It’s a multiplatform issue affecting a large number of players. I gave up playing the Operations mode because servers are unreliable. Squad chat breaks between games. So players rely on Xbox chat which means virtually no one chats ingame.

    Spawns aren’t much better than Battlefront. So except to be spawn killed 20% of the time. Part of the problem is BF1’s boots on the ground focus. Players are everywhere, so it’s hard to spawn away from the action. The biggest problem is Dice hasn’t figured out how to calculate a safe zone. I can’t spawn on a squad mate who is taking fire from a sniper 50 yards away, but I can spawn on him if an enemy is 8ft away looking right at him. Then we both get shot. Other times I spawn on a squad mate taking damage and finish off the guy shooting him. I don’t understand why this problem keeps rearing its head.

    The campaign is brief. Dice could’ve painted a gritty perspective into the spectacles and horrors of WWI. I can’t help but feel Dice spotlighted the Harlem Hellfighters for PR points. That’s a shame. There is such a rich history here, but the choppy campaign doesn’t do it justice. It lacks emotional context. Do yourself a favor and research the Hellfighters.

    I wanted to give BF1 an 8/10, but its incomplete. Missing game modes, server disconnects, broken chat, and wedged-in campaign hold it back. The fledgling Titanfall series runs perfectly out of the gate, so what’s Dice’s excuse? Still, BF1 at launch is superior to BF4’s current state. It really is Dice’s best work since the Battlefield 2 series.    … Expand
  6. blharris18
    Oct 30, 2016
    6
    I wish I knew there was historically inaccurate diversity forced into this game before I bought it. I should've known with DICE being a Swedish studio. But if you're into the SJW/PC agenda you'll like it.

    This is the first FPS I've purchased since Call of Duty: Black Ops and it pales in comparison. Nothing has topped the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 glory days,    I wish I knew there was historically inaccurate diversity forced into this game before I bought it. I should've known with DICE being a Swedish studio. But if you're into the SJW/PC agenda you'll like it.

    This is the first FPS I've purchased since Call of Duty: Black Ops and it pales in comparison. Nothing has topped the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 glory days, and I don't think anything will for the foreseeable future.    … Expand
  7. GOFUCURSELF
    Oct 18, 2016
    5
    It's... good? But idk, I didn't enjoy it. Not much... Some maps are awful, others are really great, but it feels like it has slow-paced fps mechanics and everyone plays it like a **** COD.
  8. HeeresJ0hnny
    Oct 20, 2016
    6
    I wish I could title this review, but I would have quite the conundrum, because I can't choose between the 2 I have. "An Exercise is Frustration" or "Why not WWII?" are my choices, and I wish I majored in English so I could find a way to creatively combine the two. Let me begin by saying BF1 is not a bad game. 6/10 is a perfectly fair rating, and, by my metics, qualifies the games asI wish I could title this review, but I would have quite the conundrum, because I can't choose between the 2 I have. "An Exercise is Frustration" or "Why not WWII?" are my choices, and I wish I majored in English so I could find a way to creatively combine the two. Let me begin by saying BF1 is not a bad game. 6/10 is a perfectly fair rating, and, by my metics, qualifies the games as "average." The problem with the game is that it's objectively worse that Battlefield 3 and 4 in just about every measurable way. The few areas in which the game surpasses its predecessors are the campaign (barely, holy hell just barely), graphics and sound, and class design. The campaign is a complete joke, clocking in about about 5 hours of boring, repetitive, ridiculous shooting gallery after shooting gallery. They had an opportunity to make a creative, memorable experience using the "War to end all wars," but instead wasted the setting completely. This waste of an opportunity carries into multiplayer. There is literally no reason for this game taking place in WWI other than for marketing. The game never takes advantage of the time period. It makes the game worse at every level. The guns are worse, the vehicles are worse, the gadgets are worse. Everything is worse because of the setting. The lack of weapon variety is offensive. 3 submachine guns. THREE. Every one of the medic's DMRs feel exactly the same, varying only in accuracy and magazine count. The class design is much improved, however, as the game sets the role for each class. Unlike in BF4, not every class can fill every role, and while I personally don't like that, it is an improvement when it comes to game design. The maps are great for conquest and the new operations game mode, but are absolutely horrible for infantry-centered game modes like TDM and Domination.
    In the end, if you're a battlefield fan, buy it. You'll enjoy it. But if you don't own any Battlefield game, then buy BF4 first. It's a MUCH better game. If Dice had simply set the game 35 years in the future, most of my complaints would not be an issue. WWI is too limited a setting when Dice doesn't use it to its full potential. Remember earlier when I was contemplating possible titles for this review? I just thought of a better one: "A Satisfactory Disappointment: How Dice Managed to Waste One of the Most Interesting Historical Time Periods."    … Expand
  9. trooper1993
    Oct 25, 2016
    7
    I Personally believe that the popularity behind the Battlefield franchise in the gaming market in recent years is due to its accuracy in depicting realistic and immersive scenarios happening in the present time. Essentially, Battlefield 3/4 managed to entrance the player into a conflict in which the average person with some military interest can relate too. Ultimately, any variation of theI Personally believe that the popularity behind the Battlefield franchise in the gaming market in recent years is due to its accuracy in depicting realistic and immersive scenarios happening in the present time. Essentially, Battlefield 3/4 managed to entrance the player into a conflict in which the average person with some military interest can relate too. Ultimately, any variation of the game set in a historic setting far away from contemporary warfare feels a little bit off and slightly affects the level of immersion. Whilst I still think that Bf1 is an amazing game and possibly a contender in its genre for game of the year, I don't think it's as good as its previous instalments.

    Gameplay wise, like all Battlefields it’s a good compromise between the overly realistic ARMA and the faster paced COD. Graphically, its stunning. Multiplayer is still buggy & Online customisation could be improved. In hindsight, I'd still buy the game again as current triple A title alternatives have not impressed at all. However, I’m doubtful whether the game will have the same lasting appeal as its previous instalment and this could be a major drawback for most fans. I think '7' is an honest rating for this game as it is above average yet missing the allure that made bf3/4 so immersive and enticing.    … Expand
  10. Rogeriser
    Dec 16, 2016
    7
    Looks incredible but after a few days playing you will realize its no different to the previous games. In fact game play/strategy wise its not as complex as BF4 and other BF's. The vehicles are not that interesting compared to the multi weapon helicopters etc of other games. Single player is just as pointless as always and just like a interactive cut scene.

    Overall its the best looking    Looks incredible but after a few days playing you will realize its no different to the previous games. In fact game play/strategy wise its not as complex as BF4 and other BF's. The vehicles are not that interesting compared to the multi weapon helicopters etc of other games. Single player is just as pointless as always and just like a interactive cut scene.

    Overall its the best looking Battlefield but nowhere near the best gameplay.    … Expand
  11. TheQuietGamer
    Dec 17, 2016
    7
    With other shooters continuously moving into the realm of futuristic warfare, DICE takes the Battlefield series back to the past. The WWI setting does a lot to breath new life into the series. It's the most exciting Battlefield has been in years. Seemingly every aspect of the game benefits from this new time period in some way. It's just a shame it doesn't do too much new in terms ofWith other shooters continuously moving into the realm of futuristic warfare, DICE takes the Battlefield series back to the past. The WWI setting does a lot to breath new life into the series. It's the most exciting Battlefield has been in years. Seemingly every aspect of the game benefits from this new time period in some way. It's just a shame it doesn't do too much new in terms of gameplay

    The campaign in the game focuses more on individual stories. The different chapters all follow different characters and put emphasis on different styles of gameplay. For example certain chapters focus on different kinds of vehicular warfare. This approach gives the single-player offerings a sort of episodic feel. The game also does a decent job of paying respects to the troops who gave their lives in WWI.

    The different perspectives shown in the campaign are excellent in terms of gameplay. About the time you might get tired of tank combat, another chapter opens up that will put you in control of a plane. Then there are the more standard ground combat levels. Where the campaign falls short is in terms of storytelling. While trying to pay respects to WWI soldiers, the game fails to engage players emotionally. It's rife with facts, but given how little we know the characters it's hard to care about them. We also spend so little time with them before it's on to the next set of faces. As a whole the campaign itself is over in a jiffy and there's little reason to replay it. But at the very least it's an entertaining, if brief fight through WWI. One that has more diverse scenarios.

    Yes, the multiplayer is without a doubt where the life and staying power of this game originate from. The use of the WWI setting allows from exciting new maps and fun new weapons to take center stage. The remarkably balanced vehicular combat and new modes ensure that hours of competitive fun can be found here.

    New modes like Operations and War Pigeons fit right in with the established favorites. Operations in particular is likely to become the biggest hit. A combination of Rush and Conquest, Operations is the closest one can get in Battlefield 1 to experiencing the chaos of all out war. Certainly exciting and action packed, but all the activity can lead to frustration. Getting pelted from seemingly all sides and whatnot.

    At the end of the day though this is still Battlefield. Same frustrations and highpoints. The WWI setting does do a lot to make things feel fresh again, but if you're already burnt out of the series or just never liked it in the first place, Battlefield 1 won't change your mind. The familiarity seeps through in every match. Reminding you that this is just the same Battlefield in a new skin.

    But my oh my what a pretty skin it is. WWI might not be able to reinvent the wheel, but it does a lot to add more tread. Longtime fans of the series are sure to get a kick out of the new perspective and those looking for an alternative to all the futuristic shooters out there should definitely give this one a look without a second thought. It's the best Battlefield has been in years. It's just hard to not see how similar it is to previous entries in terms of the core experience.

    7.5/10    … Expand
  12. Compi24
    Aug 28, 2017
    7
    Though it may take one too many steps back in complexity for my tastes, there's still a whole lot to marvel at in "Battlefield 1," EA and Dice's largely epic retelling of the First World War. The imagery, the gameplay, and even the music is all up to par. There's something about the simplicity of the game that I know a lot of critics/gamers appreciated, but a paring down was notThough it may take one too many steps back in complexity for my tastes, there's still a whole lot to marvel at in "Battlefield 1," EA and Dice's largely epic retelling of the First World War. The imagery, the gameplay, and even the music is all up to par. There's something about the simplicity of the game that I know a lot of critics/gamers appreciated, but a paring down was not necessarily something I ever wanted from the "Battlefield" franchise in particular. Sure, "Hardline" was a bit of a shark jump, but all the numerical entries were well within the realms of realism without sacrificing the franchise's trademark epic feel. Still though, in the current market, it's nice to see someone trying something relatively different. Good show, EA. Good show.… Expand
  13. GamingPoptartTV
    Dec 26, 2016
    7
    Im sorry I love this game and no one can say I don't but this game has one of the most poorest stories I have ever scene. Call of Duty has a better story, and I hate COD. Also the addition of load screens longer then Skyrim don't help. Yet for the huge short coming of that campaign I would love to say the Multiplayer is far better having a real war feeling. Guns feel from the time theyIm sorry I love this game and no one can say I don't but this game has one of the most poorest stories I have ever scene. Call of Duty has a better story, and I hate COD. Also the addition of load screens longer then Skyrim don't help. Yet for the huge short coming of that campaign I would love to say the Multiplayer is far better having a real war feeling. Guns feel from the time they were adapted from. Even though I don't think there was SMGs back then I wont harp on that to much. Also tanks and planes feel like tanks and planes like battlefield game has always down with perfection.

    I would say this game is a solid 7/10 Above Average only for the such disappointing Campaign, but when it comes to the Multiplayer DICE you done did good.    … Expand
  14. MonkiReviews
    Mar 4, 2018
    7
    I enjoyed this game, but not as much as other people. The war stories were very fun. Each story had new characters that were likable and fun to play as. The only thing is that it was way to short. The graphics were amazing, everything looked real! I also thought the sound was good. The multiplayer is the biggest thing in Battlefield 1 though. The Operations mode was fun, but it needs work.I enjoyed this game, but not as much as other people. The war stories were very fun. Each story had new characters that were likable and fun to play as. The only thing is that it was way to short. The graphics were amazing, everything looked real! I also thought the sound was good. The multiplayer is the biggest thing in Battlefield 1 though. The Operations mode was fun, but it needs work. The maps felt empty, they didn’t put enough buildings in each map. The rest of the multiplayer modes were fine, but again the maps aren’t great. I would recommend this game.… Expand
  15. cem12
    Nov 9, 2017
    7
    En grandisimo juego, una calidad gráfica nunca antes vista y unos mapas muy bien hechos. El fallo que le veo, es que apenas hay jugadores en los servidores debido a la gran opción de búsqueda de servidores. Deberían simplificarla a fanático y normal El modo fanático es impresionante
  16. Aginagala
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    A breath of fresh air to modern shooters with current franchises like COD going into the future we see battlefield 1 taking a step back to world war 1. The campaign is engaging and reasonably developed characters see an okay story, however the multiplayer is really where this game becomes phenomenal. The new operations puts you in a gigantic world that is action packed all throughout,A breath of fresh air to modern shooters with current franchises like COD going into the future we see battlefield 1 taking a step back to world war 1. The campaign is engaging and reasonably developed characters see an okay story, however the multiplayer is really where this game becomes phenomenal. The new operations puts you in a gigantic world that is action packed all throughout, letting you charge all together when you take over a sector it feels more of a movie than an actual game, which is very surprising for a modern shooter. I found myself playing this endlessly it was fantastic and so much fun. Other game modes are also brilliant to play with the same intensity levels. Everything from the sounds to gigantic ships crashing to the ground in a blaze of glory make this game a fantastic experience and a blast to play.… Expand
  17. CenkAlp
    Dec 30, 2018
    7
    Hikaye = 7
    Oynanış = 7
    Grafikler = 8
    Sesler = 8
    Keyif = 7
    Atmosfer = 7
    Süre = 7
  18. ThatPSXBGamer
    Jun 19, 2020
    7
    This game is good for the most part. While some sections like the tank parts are a pain, gun play is great and the stories are good. While this game can get a little over ambitious with how many enemies they can throw at you, it's decent enough to be enjoyable for the most part. Good game.
  19. luaanzero
    Sep 5, 2020
    7
    É divertido gostei muito das historias mas queria que fossem mais aprofundadas, achei curto demais, parece até que focaram só no multiplayer e abandonaram a historia, a trilha sonora é boa, os gráficos são muitooo bons, não consegui jogar o multiplayer por eu ser ruim demais
  20. JustnotherGuy
    Sep 21, 2018
    7
    General: The Battlefield 1 is a great step in its franchise. The unique setting of WW1 is fresh and unique for the first person shooters. Of course, the history books go into the trash bin after this game but it encourages you to learn more about this event. Of course, this game isn't a documentary and it's all about the fun but I have a great consideration about fun in this game.General: The Battlefield 1 is a great step in its franchise. The unique setting of WW1 is fresh and unique for the first person shooters. Of course, the history books go into the trash bin after this game but it encourages you to learn more about this event. Of course, this game isn't a documentary and it's all about the fun but I have a great consideration about fun in this game. Although, I would recommend for anyone with the good internet and access to the smooth multiplayer.
    Single player: As a history book that I've mentioned earlier you are thrown into a trash bin. Most of my experience with the game is my rage about the offline part. All of the stories are short, with lacking gameplay, and pretty much uninteresting. They aren't connected with each other in any way. Most of the "war stories" are concentrated on the general events but the writing is making a huge turn over to people and their own "feelings" which isn't making any sense because the most of the attention goes to the event that is happening. Visually: this game looks gorgeous and quite the adventure for your eyes is guaranteed. But the gameplay is lacking and it feels like a tutorial for the multiplayer with nice cutscenes. I personally would cut the "stories" part from the Battlefield franchise and replace it with the more ways to play the best part of the game offline or in co-op. That's why actually Battlefield games up to Bad Company never died out. Bad Company and Bad Company 2 have, on the other hand, great storyline.
    Multiplayer: The "Gem". The buyout. The best part of this game.
    Great visuals, gameplay, variety. Everything that you've ever wanted is here. It needs to be experienced. However, the gameplay was built more callofdutyish than ever before. "the one man army" syndrome is here. Stupidly fast-paced gameplay for the battlefield, spray and pray without thinking. Someday, this too big franchises will collapse and would be played the same way. Of course, EA wouldn't be itself if the loot boxes weren't included and a Premium pass that includes 4 DLC that was cut from the game. "Everything for the player"
    My score:
    +Good sound, +Great visuals, +Multiplayer gem, +Variety, +Fun and chaos, +Details,+DLC content isn't lacking for its prices
    -Loot boxes and a stupid "business" economy. " We make money, not games" EA
    -Lack of the Offline content
    -Servers aren't populated, DLC hosting servers are empty,    … Expand
  21. czikenpolak
    Nov 30, 2018
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Average game. They have **** positional warfare(that was World War !) and there is lots of machine guns. Soldiers in this war were using autoloader guns and they were not running with big and deathly machine guns all the time. The game is OK but they have thrown history into a rubbish bin. DLCs were too expensive too. They were in the game price. Horrible!… Expand
  22. DarCbrGr
    Jun 26, 2021
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a solid game! The multiplayer is as fun as ever and the variety of game modes is nice.
  23. skippiskip
    Apr 19, 2021
    7
    The campaign is a major improvement from Battlefield 4's campaign. I only wish that there was a singular story versus multiple stories. I understand the decision, and I respect it, it just wasn't for me, even though it was better than 4's campaign. The multiplayer is still fun, but is still not my kind of multiplayer game. Sometimes it feels like it takes years to go from spawn to theThe campaign is a major improvement from Battlefield 4's campaign. I only wish that there was a singular story versus multiple stories. I understand the decision, and I respect it, it just wasn't for me, even though it was better than 4's campaign. The multiplayer is still fun, but is still not my kind of multiplayer game. Sometimes it feels like it takes years to go from spawn to the battle, or it takes centuries to find someone and get a kill, but I guess that fits some people's preferences. It is a good game, and if you find it for $15, $20, I would say it is worth it.

    I just wish I could fight bots, or have split-screen with friends because the multiplayer is unplayable without Xbox Live Gold or Game Pass Ultimate.    … Expand
  24. zezeljmare
    Jun 30, 2021
    7
    EN:
    A solid but extremely short campaign. Good MP. Well done technical part of the job. The engine and graphics are great.

    SRP:
    Solidna, ali izuzetno kratka kampanja. Dobar MP. Odlično urađen tehnički deo posla. Engine i grafika su odlični.
  25. Haris_k
    Mar 2, 2022
    7
    I'm a pretty big battefield guy and this was a pleasant installment in this franchise. The guns in this one were a lot of fun to use and I just adored the maps.
  26. IVANCHODB
    Dec 27, 2022
    7
    A nivel visual simplemente hermoso pero acompañado de una hitbox ridicula.dado el hecho de que mueres sin que te de una sola bala pero tienes que darte 4 tiros en la cabeza a un enemigo algo sin sentido. Y más cosas así empañan lo maravilloso que hubiera sido un juego más pulido.

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Best Xbox One Game of 2016
7
#7 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2016
8
#8 Most Shared Xbox One Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
87

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 37 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. Vgames
    Mar 8, 2017
    85
    EA and DICE have done an amazing job bringing something fresh to the table in picking WW1 as the game's theme. Multiplayer is probably the best thing aspect of the game, and the well-built maps and cool game modes will keep me coming back to Battlefield 1 for the coming months.
    Read full review
  2. TrueGaming
    Jan 18, 2017
    90
    There is no game that is able to deliver such an immersive war atmosphere and a multiplayer experience on such a massive scale like Battlefield 1.
    Read full review
  3. games(TM)
    Dec 7, 2016
    70
    With many games feeling hampered by a desire to try and blend authenticity with sensationalism, Battlefield 1 is a hell of a lot of fun – a visual powerhouse and a fine return to form for DICE that’s sadly hampered by stretches of extreme frustration caused by the studio’s desire to take one step too many into the past.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »