User Score
5.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 49 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 49
  2. Negative: 18 out of 49

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Apr 1, 2014
    2
    Buggy, messy and generally an unpleasant gaming experience. Sure, it's a beta, but for the love of all that is holy at least try to smooth things out before you unleash it on the public. Horrible server connections, dropped connections and absolutely laughable hit detection are just a few of the detritus awaiting anyone bored enough to download and play this slop. Sorry ladies andBuggy, messy and generally an unpleasant gaming experience. Sure, it's a beta, but for the love of all that is holy at least try to smooth things out before you unleash it on the public. Horrible server connections, dropped connections and absolutely laughable hit detection are just a few of the detritus awaiting anyone bored enough to download and play this slop. Sorry ladies and gentlemen, this one is a D-U-D. Expand
  2. Apr 10, 2014
    1
    This game is sooooo messy! I am level 55 on BF3,level 60 on COD-ghosts (all prestiges earned) and level 36 on BF4 but i couldnt get a kill in this game. My opinion-it is played only because its free!
  3. Aug 20, 2014
    4
    Warface is decent, but it feels like the developers are trying to copy COD and Battlefield.
    Gameplay - 5/10: Warface mixes up gameplay elements from the top FPS games, but fails to reinnovate and make anything feel new. Battlefield style running, COD style classes, you get the drill. My major complaint with Warface is that you don't start on equal grounds with your opponents. They may
    Warface is decent, but it feels like the developers are trying to copy COD and Battlefield.
    Gameplay - 5/10: Warface mixes up gameplay elements from the top FPS games, but fails to reinnovate and make anything feel new. Battlefield style running, COD style classes, you get the drill. My major complaint with Warface is that you don't start on equal grounds with your opponents. They may have a health regeneration bonuses, while you don't. They may have a gun that takes one shot to kill you, while your gun may take six or seven. That's unfair. Oh, and I forgot to mention that there's no single player gameplay. Multiplayer only (with the exception of the tutorial), I'm afraid.
    Story - 0/10: Who am I kidding? Either there is no story, or the story bits are hidden in the game files.
    Graphics - 10/10: Very next-gen looking graphics, even on a current-gen console. Excellent.
    Overall - 4/10: Don't get me wrong, Warface has potential. The problem is it's brought down by a storyless, multiplayer only gameplay. If you like war games, I recommend this to you. Who knows, you might enjoy it.
    Expand
  4. Apr 24, 2014
    3
    War frame is an okay game but it has a few flaws. It is a game with very smooth game play and amazing graphics especially for a free to play game. But it has one major flaw, every 5 to 10 minutes the game freezes and the game says bad connection and stops you. This wouldn't be so bad if it stopped the enemies too, but no you could be in an intense firefight and BAM! the game freezes forWar frame is an okay game but it has a few flaws. It is a game with very smooth game play and amazing graphics especially for a free to play game. But it has one major flaw, every 5 to 10 minutes the game freezes and the game says bad connection and stops you. This wouldn't be so bad if it stopped the enemies too, but no you could be in an intense firefight and BAM! the game freezes for "bad connection" even when this doesn't happen in any other games and i have very good connection and internet you have to stand still while your enemies will just stand there and shoot you. and keep in mind that this happens every five to ten minutes. and its not just that the game freezes, the enemies are bland and un-unique not just a little but to the point where it is worse than the walking dead survival instincts! Even when enemies do move too shoot you in is in circle or just try to get behind you. Overall if this game could make the enemies way better and fix that annoying connection problem this game would be a great free to play game. Expand
  5. Sep 10, 2014
    3
    Warface is a faceless, boring, and repetitive first person shooter that is everything people accuse C.O.D. of being. And the worst part; it has no identity. The CryEngine isn't even all that impressive. The gameplay is fun, and there are lots of different missions to choose from, but that fun doesn't last long. And that's the way the game works. It starts as a fun novelty, but the noveltyWarface is a faceless, boring, and repetitive first person shooter that is everything people accuse C.O.D. of being. And the worst part; it has no identity. The CryEngine isn't even all that impressive. The gameplay is fun, and there are lots of different missions to choose from, but that fun doesn't last long. And that's the way the game works. It starts as a fun novelty, but the novelty fades very quickly. Expand
  6. Aug 17, 2014
    3
    Only free-to-play IF you don't go down the microtransactions trap that the game and it's developer want you to fall into. Awful title, non-existent premise, smudged graphics, spotty hit detection, and otherwise generic in almost every sense. FPS fans should stick to Battlefield, Call of Duty, Titanfall, anything else but this.
Metascore
60

Mixed or average reviews - based on 4 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 4
  2. Negative: 1 out of 4
  1. X-ONE Magazine UK
    Jun 21, 2014
    60
    Warface is exactly like every other war-based shooter you can think of. [Issue#112, p.80]
  2. Jun 5, 2014
    70
    Warface's first impression is good, but when you start to dive deeper into the game, you'll encounter some disturbing issues. Unlocking items is very hard to complete and for some people that is enough to stop playing the game completely. The overall experience is mediocre, but just won't do it for some players.
  3. 60
    An average game made viable by its low barrier to entry - but outperformed in almost every way by the giants of its genre. One to dabble with, but think before committing real money.