- Publisher: Ubisoft
- Release Date: Dec 2, 2008
- Also On: PC, PlayStation 3
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 227 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 122 out of 227
-
Mixed: 69 out of 227
-
Negative: 36 out of 227
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
AlixeVioletDec 5, 2008
-
-
jtJul 25, 2009
-
-
JohnnyLamontJan 17, 2009Great visuals, great fighting, but...I got sick of it pretty fast. Having to collect hundreds of blue orbs really bored me, and the positive things about the game couldn't outweigh the extremely boring navigating and collecting of blue orbs. you'll see why it's so annoying if you buy this game.
-
-
Sep 22, 2012
-
Aug 18, 2011
-
Mar 13, 2011
-
Nov 18, 2010Nowhere near as good as the Trilogy, SO REPETITVE, its nothing like the older games and it well really shouldnt be named Price of Persia should be called Prince of RAGE quit..
so many times has he jumped in the wrong direction or jumps when i didnt even press the button.. so frustration and its WAYYY too easy -
McDeadChowderDec 9, 2008McDead McLikes! I
-
-
SaxonUDec 27, 2008
-
-
Dec 11, 2010
-
Jul 30, 2013So I've paid for the game and yet it still bothers me with advertisements and in-game shop? It's just a joke, right? It really grinds my gears everytime I see something like this.
-
Mar 27, 2017Un style graphique particulier mais réussi ainsi qu'une bonne VF pour un jeu qui transpire hélas l'ennui et la répétition ; il est également saupoudré de vilains QTE ici et là . La plate-forme est emmerdante, les combats sont rébarbatifs et l'ensemble est très gnangnan. Ubisoft s'est sévèrement planté sur ce coup-là , ça arrive aux meilleurs de faire de la merde !
-
JonathonCJan 15, 2010This is possibly the worst, most repetitive game i have ever played, do not buy, rent or even borrow for free. The only lure it has is the old games reputation, you want to finish it but it presents so little enjoyment you would gain more reward from looking at a real wall than running sideways across one in this game!
-
-
KevinFJan 23, 2009
-
-
HagenMJan 7, 2009
-
-
JayGFeb 3, 2009The new PoP is visually stunning, the gameplay is absolutley fun, and the story will leave you begging for more. The only complaint which is is a lot of comments is that you cant die. Other than that the game is great, must buy for fans, rental for those who are new to the series.
-
-
[Anonymous]Dec 6, 2008
-
-
TomBDec 17, 2009
-
-
RobHMar 13, 2009
-
-
JamesPAug 31, 2009
-
-
EricESep 5, 2009
-
-
MikaHDec 12, 2008
-
-
SamuelHutchisonDec 6, 2008Non-linear gameplay is a big buzzword these days, but it only adds replay value if things change depending on what order you do them in. In PoP you can do things in any order you want, but which zones you've already cleared has no affect on what you're doing now, or what you do next. You could play it again and do everything backwards, but why?
-
-
MichaelBDec 7, 2008
-
-
MattDec 7, 2008
-
-
TjarkKJan 18, 2009
-
-
GeorgeRDec 26, 2009If you played the Sands of Time Triology, this is a different game. Its limited, linear, repetitive and frustrating. A huge step backwards in what was meant to be the next gen Prince.
-
-
Oct 29, 2012
-
Apr 25, 2011
-
Feb 11, 2015
Awards & Rankings
-
The game's core mechanics are all still there, neatly created and presented stunningly. But underneath this evident beauty, Prince of Persia fails to deliver on any sort of a challenge, and instead of carrying on the proud tradition of the series, deviates to a considerable and damaging extent because of its simple gameplay and excessive accessibility.
-
While Prince of Persia is definitely flawed and can even become tedious at points, it creates a dreamlike world that keeps you interested. It is an interactive extension of what good fiction tries to be, and while it's not for everyone, it can often leave you with a desire to come back for more.
-
Xbox World 360 Magazine UKNewcomers are likely to get more out of this new trilogy's opening than veterans, who know much better. [Feb 2009, p.74]