User Score
4.1

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 56 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 56
  2. Negative: 33 out of 56

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Oct 22, 2015
    5
    It's not a bad game, just to much hype for something that isn't their to begin with. As for the critic score you can bet it's got Activision recommended score according to an unspoken contract, and payment to several review parties (including Youtube). Plus they were also calculating all other major improvements that were not associated with The Taken King (i.e. story progression characterIt's not a bad game, just to much hype for something that isn't their to begin with. As for the critic score you can bet it's got Activision recommended score according to an unspoken contract, and payment to several review parties (including Youtube). Plus they were also calculating all other major improvements that were not associated with The Taken King (i.e. story progression character leveling up and other mandatory improvements that should've with the original story) as part of the Taken King dlc to make it seem bigger, and lastly The Taken King is over valued even at 40 bucks, though most people need to realize that it's Activision employing all these dlc's schemes, except now Activision doesn't have to worry about producing a new story like they did with Infinity Ward and the Call of Duty franchise. Expand