User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 12 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 12
  2. Negative: 1 out of 12

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Dec 2, 2021
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Much like the first game, this is a wonderfully-made blast to the past of PS1-era platformers, and for a single dollar? This is SO worth the purchase for any retro geek!

    Alright, taking off the "cheeky filter" for a moment, I don't think it is a controversial opinion to say that the intent of the first game was to provide a (admittedly cheap) surprise in the form of the "jumpscares" and other oddities in each level, while also being a pretty fun platformer. It's cute the first time around, but it does tend to wear thin after a while.

    That being said, this game subverts that by being actually enjoyable to replay, a testament the first game fails to hold as well as its sequel. The level design is tighter, and more enjoyable to navigate. While it is true a few environments are recycled from the first game, it's not as if the levels are exactly alike. Zelda is always set in Hyrule, and so there's always a Korok Forest, or a Goron Mountain, etc..

    Anyways, in general this game is a definitive upgrade to the first game, and is, in my opinion, better in every way. Good game, plus it's one dollar.
    Expand
  2. Mar 5, 2022
    7
    "The game is a step up from the original in almost every way. The final level isn’t quite as epic as in the original, but at least it has more of a conclusion. It won’t offer you any real difficulty to get through, but the S ranks will certainly challenge those who want one. Much like the original, gamers wanting a bite-sized old-school 3D platformer can’t go too far wrong with Toree 2 –"The game is a step up from the original in almost every way. The final level isn’t quite as epic as in the original, but at least it has more of a conclusion. It won’t offer you any real difficulty to get through, but the S ranks will certainly challenge those who want one. Much like the original, gamers wanting a bite-sized old-school 3D platformer can’t go too far wrong with Toree 2 – especially for the asking price."

    https://theeliteinstitute.net/2021/10/04/toree-2/
    Expand
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 2 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 1 out of 2
  1. Nov 16, 2021
    80
    Would we be happy to play another one of these down the line? A game that's essentially another level pack? Based on the evidence presented here, it would be nice to see what Siactro could accomplish with a slightly broader canvas, although goodness knows there are more than enough cautionary tales of ballooning scope hindering the smaller, simpler interactions that make a platformer fun in the first place. We'd certainly play another 'one of these', but we see potential for something more substantial, too — perhaps not a full three-course meal of a game, but a carefully crafted cocktail that expands on the super-charged rainbow-infused shot of platforming the two Torees currently on the Switch eShop offer. The best thing we can say about Toree 2 is that, as with its predecessor, we enjoyed every minute of our time with it.
  2. 40
    I'm all for short games, and if a game really caught my attention I'd be more than happy to pay the equivalent of many coffees for an hour or two's play. My issue is when the game's so truncated in its brevity that it can't deliver on its promise. If Toree 2 is indeed a nostalgic love letter to the platformers of yesteryear, then the developers should have understood what made those titles cohesive, character-driven experiences. Toree 2's simply too limited and thin to deliver atmosphere, character, or a cohesive 3D platformer experience. As the saying goes: fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I'm not making the mistake of giving this developer the benefit of the doubt this time around.