User Score
3.2

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 10 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 10
  3. Negative: 8 out of 10

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. May 27, 2020
    2
    I brought the game to play on-line and have fun with my friends, but unfortunately the game have a trashy algorithm that makes the movement server based, and the game performs really really bad making the game unplayable even with P2P and good connection between peers. If you plan to buy this game and play online forget about it. It could be a really fun game, and it is but only if youI brought the game to play on-line and have fun with my friends, but unfortunately the game have a trashy algorithm that makes the movement server based, and the game performs really really bad making the game unplayable even with P2P and good connection between peers. If you plan to buy this game and play online forget about it. It could be a really fun game, and it is but only if you play the multiplayer offline. Expand
  2. Sep 3, 2022
    1
    Frustratingly poor in-game movement. The entire game revolves around mitigating the poor physics engine.
  3. Nov 18, 2022
    0
    At first glance you might think that this game looks fun; maybe along the same lines as Human Fall Flat or Gang Beasts, but you’d be dead wrong. There are absolutely no redeeming qualities this game has to offer, mostly because of its main glaring fault—the God awful controls. All that I can say is that there is no fun to be had here at all. I mainly play games like this with my 10 yearAt first glance you might think that this game looks fun; maybe along the same lines as Human Fall Flat or Gang Beasts, but you’d be dead wrong. There are absolutely no redeeming qualities this game has to offer, mostly because of its main glaring fault—the God awful controls. All that I can say is that there is no fun to be had here at all. I mainly play games like this with my 10 year old son, so we were browsing the PS4 store and were excited to try this one. Bought it for $2.49 and that was a rip off. I wouldn’t even take it for free. Absolute garbage. Expand
  4. Oct 24, 2022
    0
    Unplayable. Poorest attempt at a game I have EVER seen. Don't even download it for free. A bad joke
Metascore
55

Mixed or average reviews - based on 4 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 4
  2. Negative: 0 out of 4
  1. Jun 26, 2020
    50
    Totally Reliable Delivery Service is the definition of a one-note joke that wears out its welcome pretty quickly. You’ll experience pretty much everything it has to offer in the first few minutes of playing it, and it’s the sort of game best experienced as part of a YouTube compilation, rather than something you need to play on your own.
  2. Apr 23, 2020
    55
    Totally Reliable Delivery Service is a game that might provide passing entertainment to a group of friends for an hour or two; and the more challenging deliveries do generate some hilarious moments whilst making one ever more determined to try and complete them. But the novelty soon wears off, and there’s not really anything here that is likely to convince many to stay. Still, that’s a little more than what’s on offer for the single player – which, disappointingly, is really nothing at all.
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Apr 20, 2020
    50
    The large open world is filled with props, vehicles, and hazards. While they add variety, the game suffers from a lack of structure. You can attempt deliveries together or solo in any order but there’s generally not enough here to consistently make your own fun (which the game is too reliant on). As sandboxes go, Team OPM did enjoy plenty of hijinks – including one memorable caper where Ian trapped Oscar on a ferris wheel, swiftly followed by Oscar’s revenge. Unfortunately, all too quickly we found we’d had our fill. [Issue#175, p.80]