Shiness: The Lightning Kingdom

 PlayStation 4
User Score
6.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 33 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 33
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 33
  3. Negative: 9 out of 33

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Kingdomhear
    May 10, 2020
    0
    Che vergogna...arrivo ad un passo dalla fine di questo "gioco " un insieme di bug ....e il gioco non mi permette di continuare per un bug ...insomma incastrato in un maledetto treno...capisco il gioco a basso budget ma qui si esagera... che tristezza...
  2. VegetaQuinn
    May 20, 2022
    4
    Extremely buggy, forgettable characters. some of the controls were busted as well.

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
67

Mixed or average reviews - based on 32 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 32
  2. Mixed: 23 out of 32
  3. Negative: 2 out of 32
  1. Playstation Official Magazine Australia
    Jul 7, 2017
    60
    The result is a charmingly clunky yarn that doesn’t wow, but has more to offer than clichés alone. [July 2017, p73]
  2. Worth Playing
    Jul 5, 2017
    65
    Overall, Shiness: The Lightning Kingdom isn't that bad. The story is good enough, if a tad generic, while the characters are likeable if you can get past their odd dialogue and exaggerated reactions. Outside of a pretty finicky magic and parry system, the combat is done well for those who crave real-time action over menus, and some of the other systems bring some depth to that. Presentation is decent, but the camera can be enough to put off some people. If you're craving a game that sticks to some JRPG standards, Shiness isn't a bad one to check out once you're done with the heavy-hitters on the system.
    Read full review
  3. Games Master UK
    Jun 20, 2017
    73
    A fantastic effort that mostly delivers on the promises made during its funding campaign. [June 2017, p.71]
See all critic reviews »