- Publisher: NIS America , Granzella Inc.
- Release Date: Apr 30, 2021
- Also On: PC, Switch, Xbox One, Xbox Series X
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 21 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 8 out of 21
-
Mixed: 4 out of 21
-
Negative: 9 out of 21
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
May 3, 2021Pues me parece un juegazo, grande la vuelta de rtype, graficamente mas bonito que el de ps2 que tenia una paleta de colores grises, eso si la musica le falta una vuelta.
-
May 6, 2021It's R-type. Either you know what to expect or you likely won't care at all. Tons of ships to unlock. A boatload of customization options. Several difficulties, and a whole universe of enemies to btfu. If you like shmup's this is definitely one of those.
-
May 6, 2021amazing game it remind me Gradius 5... need little more work for music more techno.. house song
-
May 13, 2021
-
May 5, 2021Machacamarcianos de la vieja escuela, donde también hay algo de estrategia.
Awards & Rankings
-
Jul 7, 2021R-Type Final 2 is about as niche as niche gets. It represents a genre that’s hardly en vogue, and it’s a traditional, hardcore example of an experience that ferociously clings to its roots. This is not the shmup I would gift to someone in hopes of luring them into the genre, and it’s an especially difficult sell with the rather astounding $40 price point before DLC. All of this makes R-Type Final 2 a game with a fairly narrow scope, but anyone directly within that Venn diagram will be in for an exceptionally-produced, technically excellent iteration on a legendary franchise.
-
Jun 21, 2021R-Type Final 2 is a blast from the past, a good revival of the genre with a modern twist on it. Frenetic and incredibly hard is a good pastime, but can become frustrating in the long term for the pixel perfect accuracy needed.
-
PLAYMay 29, 2021Does exactly what it sets out to do – deliver a worthy new R-Type – very well, yet a little more ambition (and accessibility) could have gone a long way. [Issue#2, p.87]