Metal Gear Solid V: Metal Gear Online

 PlayStation 4
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 8 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 8
  2. Mixed: 6 out of 8
  3. Negative: 0 out of 8
  1. Ars Technica
    Dec 9, 2015
    Metal Gear Solid Online is designed well enough that you can eke a little fun out of it, but be prepared to test your patience for the trauma that accompanies trying to find a stable online session.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 80 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 42 out of 80
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 80
  3. Negative: 17 out of 80
  1. MassRelay
    Oct 11, 2015
    1
    I knew this game would be mediocre once it was announced it was being developed by western devs. What I didn't know though is that it wasI knew this game would be mediocre once it was announced it was being developed by western devs. What I didn't know though is that it was going to be absolute crap. What a shame, MGO is dead.… Full Review »
  2. MrDeibus
    Aug 21, 2022
    7
    Metal Gear Online is fun in concept, but in practice, it feels like nothing more than a lifeless COD clone.
  3. DanneSmith
    Jan 29, 2020
    1
    Most disappointing game ever! I used to play MGO2 as my main game for years. That game had charm, a learning curve and it was its own thing.Most disappointing game ever! I used to play MGO2 as my main game for years. That game had charm, a learning curve and it was its own thing. MGO3 is supposed to be a follow-up to MGO2?! It's literally an insult to even call it MGO. It has such a poor amount of content that it might as well have been an extra feature on the iDroid in TPP called "Versus Ops" and perhaps then it wouldn't be as bad. Calling it MGO and having it separate puts expectations on it. Expectations that it doesn't even come close to living up to.

    The worst part is that some content is actually pretty good. Some maps and modes. Bounty Hunter is a fresh take on TDM. You can tell there was talent in the team. The issue must have been the leadership ordering a third person CoD so they could focus on a "wide western audience."
    Though luck! That audience doesn't exist. They expected people to leave behind CoD and BF for this mess? And the fans of MGO want niche. We don't want some third person CoD with the MGO name slapped on and a few semi-niche features which doesn't change the overall impression enough anyway.
    Konami quickly abandoned this game. Perhaps they knew you can't polish a turd.

    Positives:

    A few good maps and the modes are decent.

    Negatives:

    - Ridiculously low amount of content throughout the game. Modes, maps, unique characters, weapons and gear. Where's SNE, RES, TDM and CAP? And where's the classic MGS locations turned into maps?
    - There's no "MGS feel." The legacy of MGS has been ignored. No maps for example is taken from any of the classics, which wasn't the case in MGO2.
    - Lacking options when hosting.
    - Stealth camo in any mode makes the game unbalanced.
    - Features taken directly from other games such as Ascension.
    - Gameplay gets boring quickly.
    - Poor mic support on the PS3 version.    … Full Review »
See all user reviews »