User Score
6.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1125 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Nov 26, 2017
    5
    For Honor was one of my most anticipated games ever. As someone who loves studying the history of these cultures depicted in the game, the idea of them all doing battle in a semi-realistic and competitive environment was enough to get me completely on board. Which makes it truly heart-wrenching to write this review. In this game's current state, I simply can't recommend it. It's beenFor Honor was one of my most anticipated games ever. As someone who loves studying the history of these cultures depicted in the game, the idea of them all doing battle in a semi-realistic and competitive environment was enough to get me completely on board. Which makes it truly heart-wrenching to write this review. In this game's current state, I simply can't recommend it. It's been nearly ten months since the game's release and the game is still plagued with bugs, connection problems, and abhorrent balance issues in spite of constant promises of improvements from the developers, who've only shown themselves to be more and more incompetent as the months have gone by.

    Let's start with the bugs and connection. In 4v4 modes such as Dominion and Elimination, I'd say matches completely disconnect 30-50% of the time. Given the game's peer-to-peer connection, this wouldn't be nearly as much of a problem if player's were compensated and rewarded for their achievements and time played in matches that disconnect. Even though this would be a no-brainer feature to add (at least as a band-aid fix while proper fixes are worked on), it remains entirely absent.
    Onto bugs (and exploits). This game has a ton of them. Up until a month or two ago, there was a bug known as "flicker", where basically, due to a rather lenient input window for certain attacks known as 'zone attacks', it could first make the attack appear to be coming from an entirely different direction before going into the zone attack's proper direction. Given that zone attacks are often some of the fastest moves available to heroes, this glitch could be exploited to a game-breaking degree, turning already hard to deal with attacks into un-reactably fast, risk-free moves. Combine this with another glitch known as 'unlock tech' that allows attacks not technically aimed directly at players to be uninterruptible and unpunishable, and it makes for a very frustrating experience. While flicker has been fixed, unlock tech remains, albeit in a slightly different manner.

    Onto balance. There are four classes of heroes: Vanguards (jack of all trades), Heavy (slow and defensive), Assassin (mobile and damaging at the cost of being slightly weaker defensively) and Hybrids (mixtures of the other three). Orochi, a samurai assassin, has two viable moves at a competitive level of play: Top light attack, and zone attack. This is because all of his other moves are easily counterable or just outright useless compared to simply parrying, something all heroes can do. This in turn makes Orochi a predictable and boring hero to play as and against. Now let's compare him to Warlord, a viking heavy and one of the strongest heroes in the game. As a heavy class, Warlord has faster light attacks, better dodging abilities, obviously better defense being a heavy, he has an unblockable headbutt attack that deals a small amount of damage and is fast enough to apply pressure on a defensive opponent, he has a hilariously long throw distance of 6-10 meters in a game filled with lethal environmental hazards, he can throw players against a wall for considerable damage even greater than his heavy attacks, his heavy attacks are uninterruptible past a certain point in his animation, and can be chained into light attacks as well as vice versa. Remind me how are these heroes even in the same game? One has a symphony of usabillity and viable options, while Orochi (much like multiple other heroes in the game such as Warden, Kensei, Shugoki, Conqueror, Lawbringer, Berserker, Raider, the list goes on...) can only spam one or two usable attacks (if that even) to compete. This doesn't even begin to describe the larger underlying balance issues such as defense maneuvers in general being far too rewarding and safe compared to attacking, the game being based almost entirely on reaction time as opposed to other fighting game fundamentals such as spacing and mindgames, and it makes for a game that is simply boring and fundamentally broken at a competitive level. Combine this with a slow, ignorant, and indecisive team of developers, and it makes for a game that can only be described as frustrating on every level. They have promised fixes to most of these problems I've listed, but after many months of patiently waiting and watching developer streams, these remain to be only promises with no real ETA.

    Nonetheless, this game has a truly massive amount of potential, and still has its fun moments from time to time, which makes it all the more frustrating to see it slowly die like it has been. If the game does eventually get the fixes it so desperately needs, I'll update and/or remove this review. But I wouldn't hold your breath.
    Expand
  2. Nov 23, 2017
    8
    In my eyes this game is one of the best games I've played. Although the storymode isn't the best it gives the best opportunity to get the hang of the game, first level I played on hard just to quickly learn and revise my strategies after that I jumped right into realistic for the rest of the game. Sure I had some hard times during the run, but it sure did help when going into PvP. JustIn my eyes this game is one of the best games I've played. Although the storymode isn't the best it gives the best opportunity to get the hang of the game, first level I played on hard just to quickly learn and revise my strategies after that I jumped right into realistic for the rest of the game. Sure I had some hard times during the run, but it sure did help when going into PvP. Just launching the game ubi gives you the option to try out every hero (even dlc characters, but only on bots) which gives you an idea of who to play and master. The game modes are simple and straight forward.
    Really the only thing that I have beef with this game is the servers most of the time it's fine for me, but the times when I randomly get D.Ced and having a good game it hurts me. Other then that really good game.
    Expand
  3. Nov 16, 2017
    0
    Good gameplay, but the experienced is ruined by one of the worst micro-transaction system in the history of video-games! Oh and I don't understand why Ubisoft, a fortunate video game company, can't afford 64 tick servers (at the least)... I understand that Dedicated servers can seem out of place for this kind of game... but seriously... Peer 2 Peer... for a video game where every moves canGood gameplay, but the experienced is ruined by one of the worst micro-transaction system in the history of video-games! Oh and I don't understand why Ubisoft, a fortunate video game company, can't afford 64 tick servers (at the least)... I understand that Dedicated servers can seem out of place for this kind of game... but seriously... Peer 2 Peer... for a video game where every moves can cost you the victory. Good job Ubisoft!

    The campaign is just one big horendus cliche. The Multiplayer is where the game shine, but when someone used his credit card to buy those XP bonus to rush the prestige 10 and buy lootboxes to unlock the best gear... you just can't help but to have this Pay 2 Win feeling.
    Expand
  4. Nov 13, 2017
    10
    One of my favorite games of 2016! It is definitely fun to play with with friends and learning the each unique character is fun to get into. It is easy to find a character you will love to play as, fighting and defeating a tough opponent has never been so satisfying in a multiplayer game!
  5. Oct 4, 2017
    3
    For Honor is a fine example of what could have been. Here we have unresponsive controls (an Ubisoft trademark), enemy AI mobs who stun-lock like a bunch of grade school bullies, astoundingly unbalanced multiplayer (that's almost dead anyway) and American accents long before the States were even established. Aside from it's interesting concept and options of customization, this is one ofFor Honor is a fine example of what could have been. Here we have unresponsive controls (an Ubisoft trademark), enemy AI mobs who stun-lock like a bunch of grade school bullies, astoundingly unbalanced multiplayer (that's almost dead anyway) and American accents long before the States were even established. Aside from it's interesting concept and options of customization, this is one of the most crudely designed games ever released. Expand
  6. Sep 27, 2017
    2
    crappy campaing, and for the online experience is sad to see how a game with such a potential use P2P intead of dedicated servers, Ubisoft you are doing it wrong
  7. Sep 23, 2017
    9
    Rewriting my Review,

    This game has been through alot and improved alot, and ubisoft is still doing more improvements, As much as I tried to hate on For Honor for it's faults, it's still one of my favorite games ever and spend over 300 hours. It's gameplay, animations, graphics and mechanics and phenomenal. The only bad things I can say about for honor is a lackluster Singleplayer Mode
    Rewriting my Review,

    This game has been through alot and improved alot, and ubisoft is still doing more improvements, As much as I tried to hate on For Honor for it's faults, it's still one of my favorite games ever and spend over 300 hours. It's gameplay, animations, graphics and mechanics and phenomenal. The only bad things I can say about for honor is a lackluster Singleplayer Mode and buying stuff online with steel are way too expensive just so ubisoft can make more money with microtransaction.. Tsk Tsk Tsk.. Recommend for Melee fighting fans and hope more games will copy the great mechanics.
    Expand
  8. Aug 31, 2017
    9
    Cinematic graphics and decent animation. Sorry the full story is not, with rolls and appropriate scale. Overall liked the game.. I Advise those who like this setting
  9. Aug 30, 2017
    6
    For Honor: Good combat system, **** story and campaign, aside from the elephant battle, absolutely abysmal networking for servers, but the actual modes are usually fun if your not ganged up on. 6.8/10
  10. Aug 28, 2017
    7
    I liked For Honor its clearly made so gamers enjoy it on line. The campaign is short but interesting none the less and I liked how the story was connected every time you moved a faction and it was smoothly linked. The on line experience, would say due to the number of players enjoying the game which is apparently below adequate and way below expectations Rockies will have a hard time asI liked For Honor its clearly made so gamers enjoy it on line. The campaign is short but interesting none the less and I liked how the story was connected every time you moved a faction and it was smoothly linked. The on line experience, would say due to the number of players enjoying the game which is apparently below adequate and way below expectations Rockies will have a hard time as all levels mixed due to that player base reason. You could easily get drawn against a legendry on your day one and get annihilated but if you stick around for a while it starts to get more interesting. A unique on line experience. Expand
  11. Aug 12, 2017
    0
    It is impossible to play, the game disconnects you from the match sooner or later just like in the beta, they say they already gave servers to the game, and the truth is still the same, please do not buy it or you will get a big disappointment
  12. Aug 9, 2017
    9
    For Honor is a unique hack 'n slash adventure with many fun and interesting things to be discovered. I'll compile the positives and negatives in order to save time.
    -
    Positives: - Strong map design - The heroes offer play styles for everybody. - Detailed environments and crisp sounds. - A very fun campaign that serves as a prologue to PVP. Negatives: - Matchmaking can be cumbersome
    For Honor is a unique hack 'n slash adventure with many fun and interesting things to be discovered. I'll compile the positives and negatives in order to save time.
    -
    Positives:
    - Strong map design
    - The heroes offer play styles for everybody.
    - Detailed environments and crisp sounds.
    - A very fun campaign that serves as a prologue to PVP.
    Negatives:
    - Matchmaking can be cumbersome and just bad at times.
    - The main campaign is fun but also very short.
    - Micro transactions. 'Nuff said.

    Overall this is a very good game with a couple minor quirks here and there, but with the coming of dedicated servers and other patches, this game still has potential to REALLY shine. It's worth the price tag, but bear in mind this isn't like Call of Duty, skill is required.
    Expand
  13. Jul 31, 2017
    0
    Unbalanced **** led by kids whose parents buy them PSN cards to get steel so they can keep opening boxes for the best gear. You should NEVER... I REPEAT NEVER!!!!! pair a level 65 whose got heroic gear vs a new user! It's ridiculous that they didn't even take that into account at all. The Beta was god awful and was hoping the final game would be better. Thankfully i didn't pay full priceUnbalanced **** led by kids whose parents buy them PSN cards to get steel so they can keep opening boxes for the best gear. You should NEVER... I REPEAT NEVER!!!!! pair a level 65 whose got heroic gear vs a new user! It's ridiculous that they didn't even take that into account at all. The Beta was god awful and was hoping the final game would be better. Thankfully i didn't pay full price for this ****!!!!!!! Expand
  14. Jul 31, 2017
    8
    Yet another crapshoot from developer Ubisoft. At least that's what I said when I played the game at launch. But now, I have started playing again after roughly 5 months of leaving the game untouched, and I can say wow, I no longer have any connection issues. Matchmaking still takes some time, but that would probably be because of the lack of players. I've also had barely any lag! Not sureYet another crapshoot from developer Ubisoft. At least that's what I said when I played the game at launch. But now, I have started playing again after roughly 5 months of leaving the game untouched, and I can say wow, I no longer have any connection issues. Matchmaking still takes some time, but that would probably be because of the lack of players. I've also had barely any lag! Not sure when these overhaul updates happened, but finally, I can play matches and not be disconnected, and not even lag. The gameplay is here now uninterrupted (at least for me) and I'm able to have a ton of fun. Some of my gripes are still there; the lack of modes, the rather uninteresting characters in the story, the short campaign, and the fact that the gameplay can get old, but now, this has become the kind of game I can pick up every once and awhile and have a blast playing in short bursts. Expand
  15. Jul 17, 2017
    7
    7 for the story. Multiplayer does not interest me. .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Ubisoft f..ks us with every game they develop.
  16. Jun 19, 2017
    7
    For Honor combat wise is very cool and it had a lot going for it. The fan base just died off too quickly. I feel the lack of maps and game modes really hurt the game.
  17. Jun 14, 2017
    9
    Since I couldn't give an 8.5 I'm giving this game a 9. It is by far one of the most addictive games I have ever played. Period. This is due to the highly competitive nature of the game and the very rewarding combat.

    One of the biggest strenghts of the game is its combat. Its extremely easy to learn individual movesets (unlike other fighting games), the difficulty lies in how to string
    Since I couldn't give an 8.5 I'm giving this game a 9. It is by far one of the most addictive games I have ever played. Period. This is due to the highly competitive nature of the game and the very rewarding combat.

    One of the biggest strenghts of the game is its combat. Its extremely easy to learn individual movesets (unlike other fighting games), the difficulty lies in how to string those movesets together plus how to best combine them to beat your opponent. Combat in For Honor is rivaled by no other figthing game in my opinion. Its nature as an easy to pick up, difficult to master game is executed perfectly.

    There are essentially four game modes. Duel (1v1), Brawi (2v2), Dominion (4v4-territory type), and Elimination (4v4). Which mode you pick depends upon individual preferences such as how competitive you are and whether you prefer team play or riding solo.

    There are currently 14 characters divided into three classes: Knights, Samurai, and Vikings. For the most part the characters are well balanced. Matchups are not rock, paper, scissor based like some people claim. When you're just starting out, you may have difficulty with certain characters. But once you become experienced this is not the case. I have been beaten by, and beat, every class there is. Victory is dependent on the player, not the class.

    As much as I love this game, it is not without its flaws. Firstly, the player to player connection is at times terrible. However, this is more of a problem in the 4v4 modes. As someone who mainly plays Duel and Brawl, connection issues occurred probably 5 percent of the time. Quitting is tied to this. When a team or player is behind, or they simply just don't like losing, they'll just quit. And connection will either time out with the quitter or you'll be left with a bot. But Ubisoft is adding punishments to quitting like a wait time, so this is hopefully an issue that will be fixed soon.

    Secondly, there is an extremely steep learning curve, which I think drives many people away from the game. Not only do you have to learn your individual moveset, but the movesets of every character in order to learn how to exploit individual weaknesses and avoid particular strenghts. There's also the mechanics of counter-gaurdbreaking (getting out of a grab move) and parrying which took me roughly one-two weeks to master and I still screw them up sometime. There's also the fact that many people playing the game now are very experienced. So winning matches will be difficult at first. However, once you learn all of these things. The game becomes unimaginably addictive and fun.

    Third, there are character balancing issues. I said previously that victories are dependent on the player and experience, which are true. However, there are some characters that have advantages that make them more challenging to beat than the norm. For example, vortexes (move chain that is difficult to break out of), 50/50 moves (50 percent chance they do one move or another, and if you predict wrong you get punished), and moves that are too quick to defend against. A win is definetely achievable if you're experienced, but will require more focus than the average character.

    Next is the Single Player. Many people seem to have an issue with it because its uninteresting and bland, which I completely agree with. But people don't play For Honor for the single player, they play it for the multiplayer. Furthermore, the single player is essentially just a comprehensive practice mode. Its great for learning the mechanics of the game.

    Finally the community. Because of these issues, the community is a lot smaller than it once was. You find yourself matched up with people you've fought against before. This isn't a constant thing, but at least once a day I fight around two differnet people I've faced before. The next problem is the commmunity can be pretty toxic at times. If they don't like the way you play or they're just jerks, they can quit on you, taunt over your dead body, and straight up send you hate mail. All these things have happened to me constantly over my during my time with this game.

    I know it seems there were more cons than pros to this game, but the pros it does have far outweight the cons. The enjoyment derived from the gameplay of For Honor makes it a game I highly recommend. If you're patient and willing to learn, you will spend dozens upon dozens of hours playing this game. I hope my review was helpful.
    Expand
  18. Jun 13, 2017
    0
    It could be a great game. Fine original combat mechanics, cool visuals, competitive gameplay. But it has one problem: online almost doesn't work. From every 10 matches I can finish one, or two. In other cases players quitting, game crashes, etc... And it's a pretty big problem for an online game.
  19. May 16, 2017
    7
    Very solid game. The control scheme is challenging and refreshing. The servers are an issue ATM, but as Ubi is fixing the balance between heros a think they will fix this issue also. So is it worth $60 No. but not many games are nowadays. $40 for sure it's an addictive unique game that is a challenge to master but once you get good and settle in to your main. Damn it's fun. A 90 sec 1 on 1Very solid game. The control scheme is challenging and refreshing. The servers are an issue ATM, but as Ubi is fixing the balance between heros a think they will fix this issue also. So is it worth $60 No. but not many games are nowadays. $40 for sure it's an addictive unique game that is a challenge to master but once you get good and settle in to your main. Damn it's fun. A 90 sec 1 on 1 you eventually win and execute the player is the best feeling. A feeling you can't savor because that player is routing right back to you for revenge. Most the players are respectful, no salt if they lose to you they say good fight as they charge at you for another go around. Also is it's a fair 1 on 1 85% of players a honorable and won't interfere. That said there's not enough to it , 4 ga,e modes online and a short single player campaign. but again $35-40 it's a game that is a must play. Expand
  20. May 7, 2017
    6
    After playing closed and open beta I can clearly say that For Honor is absolutely underwhelming, it got boring after a few hours - repetitive gameplay, music and maps plus objectives. And since when did we start calling a tutorial "story mode"? Because in For Honor that is what we get - a tutorial against bots disguised as story mode. This is basically Chivalry with a new fancy skin, beingAfter playing closed and open beta I can clearly say that For Honor is absolutely underwhelming, it got boring after a few hours - repetitive gameplay, music and maps plus objectives. And since when did we start calling a tutorial "story mode"? Because in For Honor that is what we get - a tutorial against bots disguised as story mode. This is basically Chivalry with a new fancy skin, being Chivalry superior in every way. Ubisoft will have to get their paycheck ready for this to get good reviews. Expand
  21. Apr 14, 2017
    9
    Jesus, people only deal in absolutes nowadays. "Connection issues - 0/10, **** you Ubisoft" is basically every negative review in a nutshell.

    What these "reviews" fail to mention is that this game has a unique refreshing combat system allowing you to block and attack from multiple angles, pretty good balance (you can find people playing as every class, so no one is really underpowered.
    Jesus, people only deal in absolutes nowadays. "Connection issues - 0/10, **** you Ubisoft" is basically every negative review in a nutshell.

    What these "reviews" fail to mention is that this game has a unique refreshing combat system allowing you to block and attack from multiple angles, pretty good balance (you can find people playing as every class, so no one is really underpowered. Whiners saying it's unbalanced just can't play for **** this game does take skill), good graphics and animations, and even a tutorial-style single-player campaign mode, despite the game focusing on multiplayer. What is more, the season pass only offers cosmetic junk and 1-week early access to characters everybody will still be able to play! This is, like, the least Ubisoft game made by Ubisoft ever.

    Now it is true that there are connection issues, but in my ~70 hours of play (for me, it's an awful lot for a multiplayer game) the first several weeks were actually fine. Things started getting worse when they rolled out some update (can't remember the number), after which every second match resulted in loss of connection. It is truly a shame, as otherwise it's a stellar multiplayer brawler/fighter which I'll probably get back to once they release the new characters and maps in May.
    Expand
  22. Apr 9, 2017
    1
    DO NOT BUY.
    The reviewers did not play this game on the public internet.
    Crashes drops this game is a nightmare.
    IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW GOOD YOUR INTERNET IS.
    It still matters about everyone else's.
    You need specific ports open on your router.
  23. Apr 3, 2017
    0
    Si estás preparado para una experiencia de juego frustrante, pero estás dispuesto a dejar una gran cantidad de dinero sólo para que mejore un poco, For Honor es el juego para tí. Investiga por tí mismo para que descubras todo lo que tienes que gastar si quieres tener una cantidad decente de buenos ítems.
  24. Mar 28, 2017
    8
    This game is really good but there are alot of disapointing things such as unbalanced characters, premium items makes it unfair and pay to win feeling, some skills are really unbalanced like hits that hit you even when you are blocking and some characters dont even have this skill, skill point system is really unbalanced, when you learn spamming nobody can really win against you and itsThis game is really good but there are alot of disapointing things such as unbalanced characters, premium items makes it unfair and pay to win feeling, some skills are really unbalanced like hits that hit you even when you are blocking and some characters dont even have this skill, skill point system is really unbalanced, when you learn spamming nobody can really win against you and its clearly seen with certain players Expand
  25. Mar 28, 2017
    5
    Amazing combat but game doesn't offer you nothing more. Not bad but short main story and multiplayer start to boring you after 5-10 hours. There are some customization to your character but i don't see any difference on the battlefield and it makes it worthless.
  26. Mar 27, 2017
    3
    I wanted to like this game, IF u could play it without getting disconnected or server error then it's a fun game.. but more often than not, u will be disconnected during the worst part of battle, when u r winning.. This is the most disconnected/error infested game I have ever seen on PS4 or any PS game since PS1.. they really dropped the ball on the servers, hope it gets fixed... 6.4 userI wanted to like this game, IF u could play it without getting disconnected or server error then it's a fun game.. but more often than not, u will be disconnected during the worst part of battle, when u r winning.. This is the most disconnected/error infested game I have ever seen on PS4 or any PS game since PS1.. they really dropped the ball on the servers, hope it gets fixed... 6.4 user score is too high for this game, can't even play it most of the time. Expand
  27. Mar 27, 2017
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Games great fresh new IP that being said its has its pro and cons for me they were

    PRO
    1 Great MP game if u have friends 1 vs 1 are fun 2 vs 2 the others depends
    2 a lot of character's with different playstyle
    3 can make ur own banner
    4 can choose a fraction and get prizes if ur team wins

    Cons
    1 Lock system and toggle b/w targets are awful
    2 characters unlocks are locked behind grinding looks, colors/ pallets
    3 Gear scaling with it comes 2 elimination and conquest kind feels like pay 2 win when playing game mode enable by gear
    5 limited maps and game modes
    6 environmental kills and deaths are dumb at times,cant be turn off
    Expand
  28. Mar 27, 2017
    5
    Ubisoft Brings us another new title showing there not afraid to take risks when it comes to trying something new. For Honor brings us some of histories greatest and noble warriors, the Vikings, Knights, and Samurais squaring off in a history battle royal.

    For Honor is a great concept with a wonderful, fresh and unique battle system that delivers well. You start off the game creating an
    Ubisoft Brings us another new title showing there not afraid to take risks when it comes to trying something new. For Honor brings us some of histories greatest and noble warriors, the Vikings, Knights, and Samurais squaring off in a history battle royal.

    For Honor is a great concept with a wonderful, fresh and unique battle system that delivers well. You start off the game creating an emblem on a shield, after that is complete you have the choice of playing through single player or multiplayer; there is no really point in playing single player unless you want to unlock stuff (This is mainly a Multiplayer game). From there you can choose which multiplayer mode you want to take part in, duel ( 1 VS 1), Dominion ( 4 VS 4), and Brawl ( 2 VS 2). I really enjoyed playing duel the most the other ones I was carrying the people I was playing with and then getting destroyed; after you choose the mode you want to play you choose the faction you want to represent, and from there you can choose three or four different warriors from that faction that are all unique with different weapons and move sets.

    For Honor is a solid game with a cool concept and great gameplay, but it suffers terribly from the peer to peer network it can take minutes to connect to an opponent, while in game your opponent can glitch out on you so much making it impossible to play and giving you a loss that is a huge problem.

    For Honor 5/10

    To buy or rent For Honor go to gameaccess.ca
    Expand
  29. Mar 27, 2017
    8
    For Honor is a multiplayer game. The story is lacking a lot but the online gameplay is intuitive and interesting and unique. This is a title I will continue to play for a while. Goodbye crappy CODs. This is really all that needs to be said.
    P.S. Almost forgot DEUS VULT!
  30. Mar 25, 2017
    6
    There are a lot of negatives reviews on this game but in response to that, this game is a disappointment to those who were excited for it. That is not to say it is still not a good game. They need to create balance. There is one way overpowered faction that you always and I mean ALWAYS win on if you play it. This can turn people off because that is practically the only faction you have toThere are a lot of negatives reviews on this game but in response to that, this game is a disappointment to those who were excited for it. That is not to say it is still not a good game. They need to create balance. There is one way overpowered faction that you always and I mean ALWAYS win on if you play it. This can turn people off because that is practically the only faction you have to choose if you want to stand a chance. As for the controls I find myself yelling at the game because I have the analog stick in between two ways of the defense mechanic. This is causing my character to get repeatedly being hit over and over again causing him to finally die. Which leads me to my next point, the spamming in this game is incredible terrible. Let me give you an example at the start of every match you run up to your opponent and press o(b) to stun him then you can hit him 3 times then stun him again, which doesn't even give your opponent a chance of fighting. It's all great and all until it happens to you. Another thing that can happen is you can repeatedly press O(B) to stun your opponent until he falls off the edge. This is why I have a hard time playing multiplayer, because you or your opponent don't get a chance at actually fighting its just spam after spam after spam.

    As for the Campaign goes it is decent nothing incredibly moving but also not terrible. The campaign about 70% of the time is literally just the multiplayer except that its telling you what to do. There is right next to no thought process that went into the campaign that would make it unique or that would make it worth your time. It also not very challenging even on a harder difficulty, the only time I had even a little hard time getting by was the boss battle. THE BOSS BATTLE. Seriously? It was the only reason any hardcore gamers would ever play the campaign is because of the challenge, and the boss battle is the only thing that could be scraped up? I'm not saying I like playing every game on nightmare or extreme difficulty. But I do like to have a little bit of a challenge once and awhile. This game does not offer it. As for the story line it is pretty cliche and there were no surprising moments that added to the story. It is all pretty predictable about what would happen in the story. I will not reveal it to prevent spoilers. There is a co-op mode and I'm not going to lie it was pretty fun something about something slicing up guys with a friend makes the story a whole lot more tolerable.

    The graphics in this game aren't as great as Watch dogs 2 but not as bad as watch dogs 1. They do have pretty good graphics though to say the least. The blood is not very realistic as they appear out of the body not cuts. What I'm saying is you take a huge hit at a guys arm and his arm's ok but there's a lot of blood that appeared out of nowhere. With these type of games you need to have a wound where the guy was hit. Not like a game from an old call of duty game (or even newer cods) . All in all they need to patch a few things in the game before its too late for it. There is hope for the game but they have to nerf classes to make it more tolerable.
    Expand
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 59 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 48 out of 59
  2. Negative: 0 out of 59
  1. Games Master UK
    May 19, 2017
    79
    An addictive, nuanced and surprisingly deep battler, prevented from being a killer by its lack of variety. [Apr 2017, p.73]
  2. Playstation Official Magazine Australia
    May 2, 2017
    70
    The campaign might disappoint, but the game’s one-on-one online duels will take you to Valhalla. [May 2017, p75]
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Apr 11, 2017
    70
    A brilliant multiplayer battler with a combat system that captures meaty melee battles like no other, but a mediocre single-player unfortunately drags it down. [Apr 2017, p.86]