- Publisher: Panic Inc.
- Release Date: Feb 9, 2016
- Also On: PC, Switch, Xbox One
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 693 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 404 out of 693
-
Mixed: 167 out of 693
-
Negative: 122 out of 693
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Mar 15, 2016Great storyline, fantastic voice acting. A little bit overhyped game imho, but still wonderful one. I really enjoyd playing it, but at the end I was like "that's it? Is it really over?"
-
Mar 11, 2016
-
Mar 10, 2016
-
Mar 9, 2016
-
Mar 7, 2016
-
Mar 5, 2016
-
Mar 3, 2016This game is the most overhyped piece of trash I have seen in a long time. 20 Bucks for a walking-simulator. Excellent. And the ending is a joke.
People do yourselves a favour and play REAL GAMES. -
Mar 2, 2016This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Feb 27, 2016
-
Feb 27, 2016This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Feb 26, 2016
-
Feb 24, 2016
-
Feb 21, 2016Was curious about this game, so I watched a 2 1/2 hour entire play through on YouTube, and now I'm glad I didn't waste money on a linear walking simulator with an incredibly unsatisfying ending.
-
Feb 21, 2016
-
Feb 21, 2016This is the unique, beautiful, engaging and emotionally involving experience you only get about once a year (last year it was Life is Strange). I didn't want to stop until the end and I rarely felt so much connection between the main characters in a game. Would replay and even rebuy it anytime despite its rather short playtime of 3-4 hours.
-
Feb 21, 2016
-
Feb 19, 2016This game is great, it has a well written script, great voice acting and a beautiful art style. The two things that let it down are the poor frame rate on ps4 ( although now it might be patched ) and the ending is VERY disappointing, despite the annoyances I would still fully recommend you buy this game
-
Feb 18, 2016Loved this game. What a pleasant surprise. If you love the outdoors like me this game is what we been looking for. Had a blast just roaming around using the map and compass exploring doing Henry's job
-
Feb 17, 2016This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Feb 17, 2016atmospheric game truly immersive , a little too short , didn't want it to end !!!! frame rate judders a lot seriously needs a patch update to solve this .
-
Feb 17, 2016
-
Feb 16, 2016One the most intriguing game over the last few years. Very immersing, detailed and interesting story with one of the best dialogues and characters (with that budget) that i remember. This is a Must-buy if you like thoughtful and subtle games. Just everything is perfect in this masterpiece and when you finish it it's you've read a very good book.
-
Feb 16, 2016
-
Feb 16, 2016
-
Feb 15, 2016This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Feb 15, 2016
-
Feb 14, 2016
-
Feb 14, 2016
-
Feb 13, 2016The game has endless systems that are teased but not explored. For example, at one point, you will be given a fishing rod that serves no actual function. You can admire it, but are forced to put it away before you can actually use it. Also, nothing you do actually matters. It's a linear game hidden in an open world. Don't even get me started on the pretentious ending.
-
Feb 13, 2016
Awards & Rankings
-
Apr 4, 2016Firewatch is a brief but enjoyable experience set in a stunning and lovingly crafted environment, but there is no real ending – there’s simply the place where you stopped reading the story.
-
Apr 2, 2016Firewatch is a simple game that tells a simple, far from impactful, tale, which approaches greatness thanks to superb writing, acting and design work. Gameplay is kept light and straightforward, but is always engaging – befitting a game that revels in the unique storytelling potential of games. This is a new studio's debut title, but it bears the quality of a product made by a team of veterans who have a great deal more to offer.
-
Playstation Official Magazine AustraliaMar 31, 2016Dares to ask us how we deal with mistakes. It’s a shame the answer it provides is flat and unfulfilling. [April 2016, p76]