- Publisher: Panic Inc.
- Release Date: Feb 9, 2016
- Also On: PC, Switch, Xbox One
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 693 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 404 out of 693
-
Mixed: 167 out of 693
-
Negative: 122 out of 693
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Jan 8, 2017
-
Dec 26, 2021Big disappointment. No gameplay, no life in a forest?! The story pushed me to continue until I finished it and got more disappointed. Avoid thi joke.
-
Dec 22, 2022This game is absolutely terrible. The characters are dull and uninteresting, the script is cliched and unoriginal, and the walking speed is painfully slow. Even if you are a fan of slow-paced games, this one is just too slow. The graphics and sound are passable, but that's about it. The game just doesn't have anything to keep you invested. All in all, I would highly recommend avoiding this game.
-
Mar 7, 2016
-
Feb 21, 2016Was curious about this game, so I watched a 2 1/2 hour entire play through on YouTube, and now I'm glad I didn't waste money on a linear walking simulator with an incredibly unsatisfying ending.
-
Mar 19, 2016
-
Mar 15, 2016
-
Apr 25, 2016
-
Mar 27, 2016
-
Sep 10, 2017This game is utterly boring and is basically a walking simulator. I'll admit, the game looks great, but that doesn't make up for the fact that the developers are social justice warriors who try to silence anything they deem as "hate speech." They should be ashamed of themselves. You'd think that someone in the realm of video games would understand the importance of free speech, but I guess not.
-
Sep 15, 2017Its not a game but a boring walking simulator with an ugly orange visual tone and zero player choice. Also, its made by an SJW developer that supports censorship so thats something you should consider. Flushing your money down the toilet would be interesting than getting this.
-
Sep 14, 2016
-
Apr 18, 2016
-
Sep 13, 2017
-
Sep 14, 2017A game so good, it's developers will censor your free speech like they censored the free will of the main character. Make no mistake, do not attempt to play this game on YouTube, you will only be attacked by the creator after bringing them thousands of sales.
-
Sep 12, 2017The racist developers attack white people by banned Felix account
These game are too expensive. What a waste of money when buying it.I can't recommend buying this game -
Sep 14, 2017
-
Sep 11, 2017Horrible game. Would not recommend even if GameStop was handing out copies for free at the door. Plays like it was developed by blind children of questionable mental capabilities.
You are welcome Sean Vanaham. Next time learn to not abuse the DMCA features on YouTube like a child. -
Feb 9, 2016Played it for about 10 minutes on ps4 and cant deal with he performance issues. Will make you sick with its fluctuating frame rate. Avoid this game until they properly patch it. WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BEFORE RELEASE.
-
Mar 3, 2016This game is the most overhyped piece of trash I have seen in a long time. 20 Bucks for a walking-simulator. Excellent. And the ending is a joke.
People do yourselves a favour and play REAL GAMES. -
Feb 12, 2016hasnt been tested properly before release, i experienced a gamebreaker bug at day 77. not amused...
other than that its just another Walking Simulator, nerdy Story, nerdy Humor, Zero gameplay -
Sep 11, 2017
-
Sep 11, 2017Bad story, pointless plot. Clunky Mechanics - the whole game amounts to nothing and is not memorable in any way.
I wish I had never bought this game -
Sep 15, 2017This game is so simple, how could the devs screw it up so bad? Runs terribly and it is super boring. The game is also poorly written by the simple mind of Sean Vanaman. Swing and a miss buddy, try again. Not to mention this joker and his company support censorship. Never again will I make the mistake of purchasing a game from Campo Santo. Don't waste your money.
-
Sep 22, 2017This is a really flawed game.
Overhyped to kingdom come.
Not worth your money.
The best way to sum up this game is - Good Marketing campaign, Dud game. -
Jan 4, 2018Piece of crap. Wasted time and money. If you are over 18 i reccomedn you not to buy this game.
-
Jan 13, 2018This game is a scam.....
There's plenty better options that are even cheaper..
This game NEVER goes on sale for anything substantial...
Not a coincidence..
And the character of the Devs are also NOT a coincidence...
DON'T BUY! -
Aug 26, 2019
-
Aug 19, 2019
-
Mar 27, 2018Lead up, build up, for nothing. I don't feel good, I'm not sure I had a good time. There is no ending, don't waste your time :(
-
Dec 27, 2017I have no idea how this game has a semi-decent rating. It's just a nothing game really. Not fun, not exciting, no action, not really any puzzles. Just a time waster really.
-
Dec 31, 2017Despite visual quality for a low-budget game and a story that can grab you, game play is slow, clunky and erratic. Worst of all, odds are excellent that you'll get trapped in the buggy geometry. You fall between rocks, for example, and the only way out is to restart the game from the beginning. It just isn't that good.
-
Nov 28, 2021Waste of money. Performance problems, rushed ending and that attitude of “if you don’t like me you don’t understand me”. Avoid at all costs
Awards & Rankings
-
Apr 4, 2016Firewatch is a brief but enjoyable experience set in a stunning and lovingly crafted environment, but there is no real ending – there’s simply the place where you stopped reading the story.
-
Apr 2, 2016Firewatch is a simple game that tells a simple, far from impactful, tale, which approaches greatness thanks to superb writing, acting and design work. Gameplay is kept light and straightforward, but is always engaging – befitting a game that revels in the unique storytelling potential of games. This is a new studio's debut title, but it bears the quality of a product made by a team of veterans who have a great deal more to offer.
-
Playstation Official Magazine AustraliaMar 31, 2016Dares to ask us how we deal with mistakes. It’s a shame the answer it provides is flat and unfulfilling. [April 2016, p76]