Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. mrsalty101
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Why is everyone so pissed about the 85 rating from the critics. I don't feel bad for the kids that fall for it and play this like it's the best thing ever. I feel bad for the parents that didn't block their kid's accounts from spending, because you know those idiots are buying loot boxes galore.
  2. luckydutch
    Nov 4, 2017
    7
    I don't really get all the hate for this. It's not groundbreakingly innovative but the campaign is interesting and the multiplayer is just classic CoD multiplayer. The microtransactions are FAR less toxic and invasive than the RNG P2W rubbish in the upcoming Battlefront 2. Based on my current experience, I reckon I will unlock every gun within 30-40 hours of online play which is prettyI don't really get all the hate for this. It's not groundbreakingly innovative but the campaign is interesting and the multiplayer is just classic CoD multiplayer. The microtransactions are FAR less toxic and invasive than the RNG P2W rubbish in the upcoming Battlefront 2. Based on my current experience, I reckon I will unlock every gun within 30-40 hours of online play which is pretty reasonable.

    If you like CoD, you'll like this. If you don't like CoD, why are you buying it in the first place?    … Expand
  3. Freaxuk
    Nov 4, 2017
    9
    I did play CoD since first one , i hate infinity warfare , black ops 3 etc all this futuristic crap , but this one come back to basics and is really good game , campaign as always short but action packed with cool graphic , zombie with few new things really great , and multiplayer as classic i love it , for people who love CoD they will love it , haters will hate, people who say is theI did play CoD since first one , i hate infinity warfare , black ops 3 etc all this futuristic crap , but this one come back to basics and is really good game , campaign as always short but action packed with cool graphic , zombie with few new things really great , and multiplayer as classic i love it , for people who love CoD they will love it , haters will hate, people who say is the same thing never did play a game :) same game every year is fifa but they did come back to classic and people will enjoy it ;)… Expand
  4. Firewing2
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.

    I'm a huge fan of the CoD    Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.

    I'm a huge fan of the CoD series as a whole, and was very excited by the promise of a return to the WW2 roots, but this game is just disappointing.    … Expand
  5. KratosGodOfWar
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    TOXIC!! That is how I want to explain the CoD community, they **** and moan about everything!! "It's a twitch shooter, wah, wah, bloody wah..." CoD has ALWAYS been a twitch shooter...like wtf? The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again expecting a different result...like CoD haters, you know it's a twitch shooter and still expect it to be different? GTFO! ThisTOXIC!! That is how I want to explain the CoD community, they **** and moan about everything!! "It's a twitch shooter, wah, wah, bloody wah..." CoD has ALWAYS been a twitch shooter...like wtf? The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again expecting a different result...like CoD haters, you know it's a twitch shooter and still expect it to be different? GTFO! This is easily the best Multiplayer in CoD in a long time. None of this insta-melt Infinite Warfare crap. I gave up playing that mid year, although the DLC was really good I must say, they were redeeming themselves a bit. All this ****ing about microtransactions, yet it's exactly like Modern Warfare Remastered, everything can be unlocked through grinding...plus CoD points aren't even available to buy yet you lying butthurt virgins. Hating a game because it has been something it always has been is like hating God Of War because it has QTE. Just don't buy it and play it if you're no good at it instead of trolling Metacritic with your pimply arsed, Lil' Jimmy noob reviews. Game is what the hardcore fans wanted...BOOTS ON THE GROUND and not this bunny hopping, zero quick scoping catastrophe that has become of it lately. This is just straight up fun, nice maps to flank on, awesome zombies mode and refreshing campaign. Haters are gonna hate, players are gonna play...what do you want to be?… Expand
  6. riverkev95
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    Una correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente queUna correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente que paga por mejores armas con la gente que juega sin pagar mas por el videojuego es terrible.
    A pesar de sus puntos positivos anteriormente descritos, lo que mas choca en este juego es el hecho de que se hayan implementado todas las políticas mas nefastas que existen actualmente en el mundo de los videojuegos, aprovechandose así de su inmensa base de usuarios fieles a la saga.
    Entre estas políticas nefastas puedo mencionar que el juego viene recortado de lanzamiento (Prueba de esto es el DLC ya anunciado para enero de 2018), las lootboxes que están tan de moda en casi todos los videojuegos pero en este juego son implementadas de una forma mas descarada ya que tú puedes ver como los otros jugadores reciben sus premios tras comprar una cajita de estas, esto va acorde al matchmaking que relacione jugadores que no han gastado dinero extra en el videojuego con personas que gastan un montón y por lo tanto consiguen mejores armas en tu cara, lo cual provoca un online totalmente desbalanceado, por no decir que roto.
    En conclusión, este juego mejora algunos aspectos del juego del año anterior, pero la forma tan descarada en que Activision gana dinero de sus usuarios en este juego no me deja ponerle una mejor nota que "3".    … Expand
  7. StoryMaterial
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Amazing game that far surpasses my super high standards. Competitive multiplayer includes many features to work towards and the vast variety at display is outstanding. The new ideas within this game provides fresh gaming moments whether it be headquarters, the new war game mode or the numerous of other surprising additions. Lastly I can't wait for the ranked play season to begin and fromAmazing game that far surpasses my super high standards. Competitive multiplayer includes many features to work towards and the vast variety at display is outstanding. The new ideas within this game provides fresh gaming moments whether it be headquarters, the new war game mode or the numerous of other surprising additions. Lastly I can't wait for the ranked play season to begin and from what I hear ranked play is going to be done right just like this entire game!… Expand
  8. timefish576
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Single player seems fine, even if it is more of the same. I play COD for the multiplayer but this is a step backward (and I don't mean because its BOTG). This plays like it is Advanced Warfare (BOTG Edition). If I paid attention and saw that Sledgehammer was making this I would have rented before buying. I'm pretty sure they even used some of the same sounds from AW. So far for me itSingle player seems fine, even if it is more of the same. I play COD for the multiplayer but this is a step backward (and I don't mean because its BOTG). This plays like it is Advanced Warfare (BOTG Edition). If I paid attention and saw that Sledgehammer was making this I would have rented before buying. I'm pretty sure they even used some of the same sounds from AW. So far for me it is purely twitch gameplay which means you can't play smart. For most of the COD multiplayers I'm a 2.0 KD player. I like to outsmart people, not just out reflex them. Sniping is a joke, no point when a AR can pick you off across map. Shotguns are way to powerful (probably will be nerfed). Overall the movement and aiming feel floaty, like AW. I'll keep playing for now but I'll probably be going back to MW remastered soon. Please Please make a Modern Warfare 2 remaster!

    FWIW my top COD multiplayers:

    MW2
    Ghost (all the hate ruined the series IMO)
    MW3
    MW Remastered
    BO2    … Expand
  9. kinlopunim
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badlyinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly copied game mechanics.… Expand
  10. CommonSenseGuy
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    I've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% isI've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% is actually playing the game. The game itself, when I can actually play it, isn't bad. I haven't touched the campaign because, like I mentioned before, I only bought this to play online multiplayer with my loved ones. I'm willing to change my review score if Sledgehammer can patch things up so I can actually play the game that I bought. I only ask that I can go 10 minutes without an error popping up. An error literally just showed up as I was typing this review. I'm not even joking. Kill me… Expand
  11. fr003ank
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    They put the maps that are supposed to be in the base game in the first dlc which only leaves the base game with 10 MP maps including the bonus map, this is unacceptable for a COD game
  12. liamandjo
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Disappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to thinkDisappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to think just run around a corner and get blasted. Campaign mode is OK, hence the 1 point. But I doubt I will get back to it. And the graphics - seriously? I feel I am back on my PS3.… Expand
  13. Rafasempere
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Un auténtico engaño de juego a base de corta-pega de otros títulos de la saga. Coge cualquiera de los últimos CoD, quítale los saltos y las movidas futuristas y ponle una skin de la segunda guerra mundial. Ya tienes el CoD WW2.
    Armas sin retroceso alguno y totalmente descompensadas, texturas y animaciones tan simples que el Counter Strike le da un buen repaso. Los mapas multijugador son    Un auténtico engaño de juego a base de corta-pega de otros títulos de la saga. Coge cualquiera de los últimos CoD, quítale los saltos y las movidas futuristas y ponle una skin de la segunda guerra mundial. Ya tienes el CoD WW2.
    Armas sin retroceso alguno y totalmente descompensadas, texturas y animaciones tan simples que el Counter Strike le da un buen repaso. Los mapas multijugador son enanos, simples y monótonos diseñados para contentar a los niños rata en su carrera a ver quien es el primero en sacarse los prestigios.
    Haber pagado más de 60€ por semejante aberración me hace arrepentirme de haberlo comprado digital (si lo tuviera en físico ya lo tendría a la venta).
    El que quiera jugar a un fps con ambientación clásica que compre el Battlefield 1. Ya está bien de tanto engaño con la serie CoD. Nunca más.    … Expand
  14. ApexCryptLord
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    I must say the story is really great, it has some great missions and it has some really great moments. But tbh. the multiplayer is still not good as the old ones. What is really disappointing. And i don't really know, why CoD has a MMO mod?
  15. Quijote
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  16. whatever523
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Yay, lootboxes!

    You are paying for those extra profits with user ratings. I think you will find that in the long run, it's not worth it. Just ask Ubisoft.
  17. metasebii
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    I'm a totally neutral FPS player and have enjoyed both COD and BF in the past. After playing BF1 for the last year or so, switching to this felt like playing a game from the 90s. There is simply no realism in the mechanics, the history, or even the sound effects. I felt zero immersion when playing this game. I was seriously hyped about this title, more than I have been about any other forI'm a totally neutral FPS player and have enjoyed both COD and BF in the past. After playing BF1 for the last year or so, switching to this felt like playing a game from the 90s. There is simply no realism in the mechanics, the history, or even the sound effects. I felt zero immersion when playing this game. I was seriously hyped about this title, more than I have been about any other for a long time, and I was severely disappointed. After playing the game both in campaign and online for a couple of hours, I am going to return it today.

    More than disappointing — this is just a bad game.    … Expand
  18. NRPostma
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Let's be clear. People giving this game below a 5 are pathetic reviewers. They can't imagine a perspective outside their own and let anger interfere with their judgment. The developers put loads of work into this game and it came out great, while not perfect, no COD ever is. The argument that it deserves a 0 or 1 because it is a twitch shooter is absurd. If you don't like twitch shootersLet's be clear. People giving this game below a 5 are pathetic reviewers. They can't imagine a perspective outside their own and let anger interfere with their judgment. The developers put loads of work into this game and it came out great, while not perfect, no COD ever is. The argument that it deserves a 0 or 1 because it is a twitch shooter is absurd. If you don't like twitch shooters that's fine, but understand lots of people love them. There are lots of amazing games that I hate to play because they are not my type! I don't go and review them as a 1 because they don't suit my taste, or because I'm bad at them. Yes, this is the millionth cod and they are all relatively similar. People complain they want something new. They get something new and complain they want old cod. Accept you guys can never be satisfied. It's not the games fault, you have just grown out of the series. When you start a new job, you may love it at first, but as the year's progress you will find complaints and issues with it even though its the same old job from before. COD games bring in BILLIONS of dollars for a reason. Overall, people cant stop playing, hating, and loving every moment of the games. Get a grip on your all or nothing opinion.… Expand
  19. Yunior
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    SMH!!! People coming in here to give a bad review just because they suck at the game. People, the game is way better in all aspects than any previous COD game. Is it perfect?? No, it is not perfect. It still has many areas where it needs improvements. But it is way better and way more fun than any other COD. Don't listen to all the exo suit fanboys coming in here to give bad reviews.
  20. Vebshtar
    Nov 3, 2017
    6
    Call of Duty has been a complete failure for years now. Does WWII redeem the franchise? No, it doesn't. But it's a start.
    Graphics: 7/10. I've seen better.
    Gameplay: 8/10. Simple boots on the ground. I like it. Campaign: 7/10. I haven't finished it, but it's decent so far. Multiplayer: 7/10. I'm out of practice, but it's still fun. Historical Accuracy: 2/10. You'll see. Call of    Call of Duty has been a complete failure for years now. Does WWII redeem the franchise? No, it doesn't. But it's a start.
    Graphics: 7/10. I've seen better.
    Gameplay: 8/10. Simple boots on the ground. I like it.
    Campaign: 7/10. I haven't finished it, but it's decent so far.
    Multiplayer: 7/10. I'm out of practice, but it's still fun.
    Historical Accuracy: 2/10. You'll see.

    Call of Duty is like an Adam Sandler movie. I know I'm not getting the best, and parts of it may suck, but it's still fun.    … Expand
  21. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that do fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  22. Guilfred
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    luck boxes en un cod? enserio, aparte de tener la campaña mas sosa y corta que e visto en un juego de la 2da guerra mundial, del asco, despues de todo eso entras al multijugador y llena de cheatters pff no recomiendo el juego, lo acabo de regresar en steam
  23. mrseannathan
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    I will keep an open mind seeing as it hasn't even been 24 hours since launch.

    1. I expected a much better visual experience when playing online. Graphics feel like they were pulled from a COD 4 -5 years ago. 2. This social hub or whatever it is.. yes, i know it's obvious but damn, way to copy Destiny. I want my COD to be simple with the menus and everything the way it has been. 3.    I will keep an open mind seeing as it hasn't even been 24 hours since launch.

    1. I expected a much better visual experience when playing online. Graphics feel like they were pulled from a COD 4 -5 years ago.
    2. This social hub or whatever it is.. yes, i know it's obvious but damn, way to copy Destiny. I want my COD to be simple with the menus and everything the way it has been.
    3. LOADING TIMES.. HOEEEE LEEEEEEEEE (Holy!)... Even when leaving a match, i'm waiting ages until I can leave.

    I give this a 5/10 only because I am a long fan of Call of Duty and I will always love the series. Despite the poor execution, it still offers that appeal in a WW2 game... Especially now that they have added 'WAR', a mode perfected by Battlefield and one I have always wish to see in COD. There are some things that need to get fixed and I'm sure they will over the next couple days but in my eyes, it's failed on launch unlike the past releases.

    I'm a huge sucker for WW2 games but I have to say.. I miss the jumping, fast-paced gameplay COD evolved into.. and at this current moment, I can say I enjoyed IW way more that WWII.    … Expand
  24. leonardo2360
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    este videojuego es el claro ejemplo de como esta la industria en estos momentos cajitas aleatorias cayendo del cielo, season pass, campaña cortisima, penoso de verdad no compren este juego no apoyen a estas compañias que quieren dividir la comunidad del videojuego por politicas de mierda.
  25. joseLuis1
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    no lo recomiendo, las cajas con regalos caen del cielo (las cuales te sacan del video juego por completo), hay muertes ilimitadas, muy repetitivo y poco innovador, parece un casino de la segunda guerra mundial, muy decepcionado de esta entrega, espero que las próximas entregas mejoren.
  26. Blindsyde
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    As I started playing the campaign , I felt like I did back in the good ol days of Call of Duty 2 , on the Xbox 360. The graphics and sound are top notch, the story is something familiar , but that’s not a bad thing for me. There’s something special about knowing that the experience you are playing through really happened. I haven’t played through the whole campaign , but I’m lookingAs I started playing the campaign , I felt like I did back in the good ol days of Call of Duty 2 , on the Xbox 360. The graphics and sound are top notch, the story is something familiar , but that’s not a bad thing for me. There’s something special about knowing that the experience you are playing through really happened. I haven’t played through the whole campaign , but I’m looking forward to getting back to it tonight.
    The zombies are darker, realer, creepier. Much better than the corny ones of the past.
    Multiplayer/pvp..... hmmm. I wanted to like it , but it’s definitely just another year of twitch shooting reskinned for the time frame. There are a few new things added, which are welcome additions. The new social hub , headquarters, is just like destinys “tower”,...which is a welcome addition to me. I like that they added the shooting range. War is an attempt at adding something new and fresh, but honestly I’d rather go play some Battlefield 1 for that fix. Battlefields pvp is in a league of its own, compared to this. I had a match last night where I was watching a replay of a final kill cam that showed some nonsensical quick scoping for kills that weren’t even CLOSE to being a hit. I tried to upload the capture to YouTube from my PS4 , but it keeps giving me errors and not letting me upload it. Good for Activision that I can’t get this footage out. They’d be embarrassed , lol.
    All in all, I really enjoy the campaign and zombies , but for my pvp fix there are newer , fresher things to play right now.    … Expand
  27. MKGamer
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    1 hour ago I finished this game.It was a strange feeling.I wish it was never finished. I think the story is fantastic. I love that so much.It's very beautiful and emotional ... It was very magnificent. This is the best game of 2017...touched my heart.I wish it continued forever
  28. kingz261
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    Okay so first off. This is the best Call of Duty campaign in roughly ten years. I personally think all of the campaigns since the first two have aged like **** but MW1, MW2, Blops, WAW, were all pretty fun campaigns when they came out. Call of Duty 1 and 2 have the best campaigns as they were made with primarily a PC focus and the campaigns were the main draw point to those two. Those twoOkay so first off. This is the best Call of Duty campaign in roughly ten years. I personally think all of the campaigns since the first two have aged like **** but MW1, MW2, Blops, WAW, were all pretty fun campaigns when they came out. Call of Duty 1 and 2 have the best campaigns as they were made with primarily a PC focus and the campaigns were the main draw point to those two. Those two are classics and this game definitely tries to recapture what made those so good. Its a pretty good campaign but very short (5 or 6 hours on hardened). The switch back to healthpacks instead of the regenerating bulls*** is a amazing choice here. So the campaign is great, whats wrong? Well the zombies is meh, not bad nor good. And the multiplayer.... Its still the same garbage tripe that the series has been pushing out the past few years. Advanced Warfare had one of the better multiplayer components in recent years and it still wasnt very good. This multiplayer is just bad, they took a lot of inspiration from the originals for the campaign but didnt do anything for the multiplayer. I do not understand how people still enjoy this after all these years and improvements from other series. Its the same garbage circular map design where its basically a matter of who sees who first with a focus on grinding so you can unlock the cheap a** weapons so you can mow down the lower level players who use pea shooters. Its the same unbalanced garbage that really requires very little skill and lots of bulls***. Its a shame because the campaign is one of the best in the series.

    Campaign = 7.8/10 (still very short which sucks and some bad on-rails sequences and QTEs)
    Multiplayer = 3/10 (very little good to be said about this)
    Zombies = 5/10 (nothing new really, just a horror atmosphere and its just boring.)
    Graphics = 9.2 (pretty damn good)
    Sound = 9.5 (COD always has fantastic sound design)

    Id say buy this used and beat the campaign then return it or get it on sale. The multiplayer is what really kills this game since its the main focus and its abysmal. But even though most of my review is negative, the campaign still deserves a lot of praise as a call of duty campaign since the past 5 have had absolute garbage campaigns.    … Expand
  29. mrcrunch08
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    I don't get the hype and high reviews. Level layout in mp is pretty crap and controls are clunky. It feels like a big step back and oddly feels older and worse than cod remastered. The campaign is good and looks great but is short as usual. It's just the mp that is a huge let down. My guy constantly stops running for no reason resulting in my guy standing still or slowly walking into aI don't get the hype and high reviews. Level layout in mp is pretty crap and controls are clunky. It feels like a big step back and oddly feels older and worse than cod remastered. The campaign is good and looks great but is short as usual. It's just the mp that is a huge let down. My guy constantly stops running for no reason resulting in my guy standing still or slowly walking into a bullet. The majority of the maps seem to have no effort at all put in to them. It blows my mind that some people think this is better than infinite. There is nothing at all new or exciting here. Just a slow paced, clunky fps with mediocre mp. It doesn't even come close to cods of old and shouldn't even be allowed to sit on a shelf next to bf1.… Expand
  30. EvanGeistfeld
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    The only thing that shines in the game is the Singleplayer. Hello Everyone and Welcome. I happened to get a lot of time in on the multiplayer and zombies, but for the singleplayer, well I could play that all day if I really wanted to. The graphics actually look realistic in the singleplayer more so than the multiplayer. This review though is only based on what I thought of the multiplayerThe only thing that shines in the game is the Singleplayer. Hello Everyone and Welcome. I happened to get a lot of time in on the multiplayer and zombies, but for the singleplayer, well I could play that all day if I really wanted to. The graphics actually look realistic in the singleplayer more so than the multiplayer. This review though is only based on what I thought of the multiplayer aspects and zombie mode. The multiplayer seems to be different for those who are used to jetpacks yatta yatta. We are heading back to WW2 and it feels nice for a change. I topped the leadboard on my first match with flame shotgun bullets. It was satisfying for sure. Although there is something that I do not like about this game, and it is the fact that they tried so hard to make this a game that would be played for hours on end, with amazing detail and what not. Unfortunately this game is not amazing and lacks a lot of graphical improvements and the optimization is just crap. I played on a 144hz monitor 2460 or 2K screen, with a 1080 graphics card and it didn't look all that great. The multiplayer is ok at best, but moving over to zombies, is just downright cringe worthy. The zombies look amazing art wise and their voices uncomfortable feeling which is great, but it just isn't as scary as we had hoped for the series. It has jump scares, but that is it. This Call of Duty, is by far an improvement for sure in some areas, but overall just isn't a game that I am interested diving more into. It was unfortunate because this was one of my anticipated game of this year, and it did not deliver to the hopes I thought it would bring.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »